Commentary: Selective Development of Anticorrelated Networks in the Intrinsic Functional Organization of the Human Brain
Marie Arsalidou
Maksim G. Sharaev3 
Tatyana Kotova
Olga Martynova- 1Department of Psychology, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia
- 2Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Canada
- 3National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, Moscow, Russia
- 4Cognitive Research Lab, Russian Academy for National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), Moscow, Russia
- 5Centre for Cognition and Decision Making, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia
A commentary on
Selective Development of Anticorrelated Networks in the Intrinsic Functional Organization of the Human Brain
by Chai, X. J., Ofen, N., Gabrieli, J. D., and Whitfield-Gabrieli, S. (2014). J. Cogn. Neurosci. 26, 501–513. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00517
As adults we solve problems by applying our executive know-how and directing our mental-attention to relevant information. When we are not problem solving, our mind is free to wonder to things like lunchtime; this is often referred to as the default-mode. It is established that for adults the relation among executive and default-mode brain areas is negative (Fox et al., 2005; Arsalidou et al., 2013). Parts of the prefrontal cortex are involved in both the executive and default-mode networks.
Chai et al. (2014) examined the relation among executive and default-mode areas in children, adolescents and adults, using resting-state fMRI. This is likely the most thorough, methodologically sound paper to date that investigates this relation across typical development. Although it was unclear whether data adhered to assumptions for parametric tests such as homoscedasticity, as Pearson's correlations are sensitive to outlier data, the authors examine different aspects of their data by (a) controlling for movement and artifact, (b) performing group analyses and covarying outliers, and (c) repeating the analyses using global signal regression. Overall, results show that across groups (8–12, 13–17, and 18–24 year-olds), relations among executive and default-mode areas are heterogeneous. In many regions the relation among executive and default-mode areas are positive in children. For adolescents it becomes more anti-correlated (i.e., more adult-like), eventually converting to a negative relation in adults. The authors highlight that functional connectivity reversal cannot be accounted by performance differences per se, because functional images were recorded at rest.
Results are fascinating and understandably interpreting such findings is challenging. The authors suggest that lower performance on working memory and cognitive control generally found in younger children may relate to the lack of anti-correlation. Yet they report that Intelligence Quotient (IQ) scores did not correlate with age, suggesting that participants were cognitively comparable. Why is this relation positive in children? We believe what is lacking in Chai et al. (2014) is a developmental theory-based interpretation. Here we highlight that the mechanisms that underlie this change from positive correlation in children to negative correlation in adults may be driven not only by cognitive processes but also by affective processes that develop across those formative years.
We define affective processes within the developmental theory of constructive operators (Pascual-Leone and Johnson, 2005; Pascual-Leone, 2012). Although emotions and cognitions can assign vital and truth value to a situation, respectively, pure affects have innate, evolutionary foundations. Specifically, unlike pure affects, emotions have to cross boundaries with cognition in order to apply and be perceived (Pascual-Leone et al., 2015; Arsalidou and Pascual-Leone, 2016). Younger children are more likely to be drawn by the here-and-now so that salient features of a situation are more likely to motivate their decisions.
Consider the famous marshmallow experiment, when 4-year-olds were asked to either eat one marshmallow in their plate or wait and get a second marshmallow when the experimenter returned (Mischel et al., 1972). The majority of children did not wait and ate the one delicious marshmallow, whose salience discounted the value of two marshmallows in the future. According to Bar (2010), future-oriented processes elicit activity in areas such as the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. This region is also critical for processing all sorts of rewards (Sescousse et al., 2013) and the default-mode network (Spreng et al., 2009). Notably, anterior default-mode regions show more heterogeneity, in their anatomical and functional connections, rather than posterior and ventral default-mode regions (Sharaev et al., 2016), perhaps suggestive of their dynamic role in the formation of prefrontal subsystems, as we know them in adults.
Personal wants, needs, feelings, and emotions may not clearly differentiate from cognitive decisions for children, giving rise to a positive relation between default-mode and executive brain areas. We need to consider the relational state among personal wants, current situation, and cognitive aptitude (i.e., mental-attentional capacity, inhibition). Since children are less likely to plan ahead in order to satisfy their personal wants they mainly focus on the current situation. Moreover, cognitive aptitude is inevitably linked to brain maturation. The prefrontal cortex, in particular, has a protracted development (Gogtay et al., 2004), which corresponds to a period of significant cognitive improvements (Arsalidou et al., 2010; Powell et al., 2014). According to developmental theory, children between 8 and 12 years have a mental-attentional capacity between 3 and 5 symbolic scheme-units (Pascual-Leone, 1970; Arsalidou, 2013). Adolescents, ages 13–17, however have a mental-attentional capacity between 6 and 7, a number similar to that of adults (Miller, 1956, Pascual-Leone, 1970). As the amount of information children can effectively hold and manipulate in mind increases the more able they become to control personal processes and more able to direct their thoughts to future-oriented processes (Pascual-Leone, 2014). Until higher-order executive schemes for planning and inhibition develop, areas related to default-mode and executive networks would activate together. Anticorrelations observed in adolescents and adults are likely a consequence of a learned functional pattern or coping strategy that helps the person maintain balance between current reality and stimulus-independent thoughts.
Work by Chai et al. (2014) has important practical and theoretical implications. Practically future fMRI studies should not average over large age-ranges as critical differences are observed between children and adolescents. Moreover, given the intricate relation between cognitive and affective processes across development, future connectivity studies may consider administering measures that evaluate core cognitive abilities such as mental-attentional capacity (e.g., Arsalidou and Im-Bolter, 2016) and measures that evaluate affective development such as theory of mind (e.g., Happé, 1994), perspective taking (e.g., Dixon and Moore, 1990), motivation (e.g., Lepper et al., 2005), or self-control (e.g., Achenbach, 1991). Theoretically, it would be fascinating to see at which age exactly these transitions occur in the brain and whether they adhere to developmental predictions. Although, adult task-based neuroimaging studies assessing meta-awareness (i.e., noting the current contents of consciousness) and mind-wandering have being done (Schooler et al., 2011), no such studies are available with children, perhaps because methods for addressing this questions are not yet available. Research in this direction would fuel the construction of improved developmental neurocognitive models.
Author Contributions
All authors listed, have made substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.
Funding
MA was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada. MS was supported by a junior grant from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, RFBR Project 16-34-00558 mol_a, TK was supported by the Russian Foundation for the Humanities project No-15-06-10943, and OM was supported by the Russian Academic Excellence Project “5-100.”
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The reviewer KR and handling Editor declared their shared affiliation, and the handling Editor states that the process nevertheless met the standards of a fair and objective review.
References
Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4–18 and 1991 Profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
Arsalidou, M. (2013). Working memory capacity: the need for process task-analysis. Front. Psychol. 4:257. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00257
Arsalidou, M., and Im-Bolter, N. (2016). Why quantitative measures are critical for understanding typical and atypical cognitive development. Brain Imaging Behav. 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s11682-016-9592-8. [Epub ahead of print].
Arsalidou, M., and Pascual-Leone, J. (2016). Constructivist developmental theory is needed in developmental neuroscience. npj Sci. Learn. 1:16016. doi: 10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.16
Arsalidou, M., Pascual-Leone, J., and Johnson, J. (2010). Misleading cues improve developmental assessment of working memory capacity: the color matching tasks. Cogn. Dev. 25, 262–277. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2010.07.001
Arsalidou, M., Pascual-Leone, J., Johnson, J., Morris, D., and Taylor, M. J. (2013). A balancing act of the brain: activations and deactivations driven by cognitive load. Brain Behav. 3, 273–285. doi: 10.1002/brb3.128
Bar, M. (2010). Wait for the second marshmallow? Future-oriented thinking and delayed reward discounting in the brain. Neuron 66, 4–5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.04.001
Chai, X. J., Ofen, N., Gabrieli, J. D., and Whitfield-Gabrieli, S. (2014). Selective development of anticorrelated networks in the intrinsic functional organization of the human brain. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 26, 501–513. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00517
Dixon, J. A., and Moore, C. F. (1990). The development of perspective taking: understanding differences in information and weighting. Child Dev. 61, 1502–1513. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb02878.x
Fox, M. D., Snyder, A. Z., Vincent, J. L., Corbetta, M., Van Essen, D. C., and Raichle, M. E. (2005). The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 9673–9678. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504136102
Gogtay, N., Giedd, J. N., Lusk, L., Hayashi, K. M., Greenstein, D., Vaituzis, A. C., et al. (2004). Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 8174–8179. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402680101
Happé, F. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: understanding of story characters' thoughts and feelings be able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 24, 129–154. doi: 10.1007/BF02172093
Lepper, M. R., Henderlong-Corpus, J., and Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: age differences and academic correlates. J. Educ. Psychol. 97, 184–196 doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.184
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol. Rev. 63:81. doi: 10.1037/h0043158
Mischel, W., Ebbesen, E. B., and Zeiss, A. R. (1972). Cognitive and attentional mechanisms in delay of gratification. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 21, 204. doi: 10.1037/h0032198
Pascual-Leone, J. (1970). A mathematical model for the transition rule in Piaget's developmental stages. Acta Psychol. (Amst). 32, 301–345. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(70)90108-3
Pascual-Leone, J. (2012). “Piaget as a pioneer of dialectical constructivism: Seeking dynamic processes for human science,” in After Piaget, eds E. Marti and C. Rodriguez (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers), 15–42.
Pascual-Leone, J. (2014). “Dialectics,” in Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology, ed T. Teo (New York, NY: Springer), 421–428.
Pascual-Leone, J., and Johnson, J. (2005). “A dialectical constructivist view of developmental intelligence,” in Handbook of Understanding and Measuring Intelligence, eds O. Wilhelm and R. Engle (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage), 177–201.
Pascual-Leone, J., Pascual-Leone, A., and Arsalidou, M. (2015). Neuropsychology still needs to model organismic processes “from within”. Behav. Brain Sci. 38:e83. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X14000983
Powell, T. L., Arsalidou, M., Vogan, V. M., and Taylor, M. J. (2014). Letter and colour matching tasks: parametric measures of developmental working memory capacity. Child Dev. Res. 2014:961781. doi: 10.1155/2014/961781
Schooler, J. W., Smallwood, J., Christoff, K., Handy, T. C., Reichle, E. D., and Sayette, M. A. (2011). Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind. Trends Cogn. Sci. 15, 319–326. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.006
Sescousse, G., Caldú, X., Segura, B., and Dreher, J. C. (2013). Processing of primary and secondary rewards: a quantitative meta-analysis and review of human functional neuroimaging studies. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 37, 681–696. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.02.002
Sharaev, M. G., Zavyalova, V. V., Ushakov, V. L., Kartashov, S. I., and Velichkovsky, B. M. (2016). Effective connectivity within the default mode network: dynamic causal modeling of resting-state fMRI data. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10:14. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00014
Keywords: development, default-mode network, executive attention, functional connectivity, resting state, fMRI
Citation: Arsalidou M, Sharaev MG, Kotova T and Martynova O (2017) Commentary: Selective Development of Anticorrelated Networks in the Intrinsic Functional Organization of the Human Brain. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11:13. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00013
Received: 26 June 2016; Accepted: 09 January 2017;
Published: 23 January 2017.
Edited by:
Srikantan S. Nagarajan, University of California, San Francisco, USAReviewed by:
Veena A. Nair, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USAKamalini Gayathree Ranasinghe, University of California, San Francisco, USA
Copyright © 2017 Arsalidou, Sharaev, Kotova and Martynova. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Marie Arsalidou, marie.arsalidou@gmail.com