REVIEW article

Front. Synaptic Neurosci., 06 October 2021

Volume 13 - 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsyn.2021.749001

The Non-receptor Tyrosine Kinase Pyk2 in Brain Function and Neurological and Psychiatric Diseases

  • 1. Institut du Fer à Moulin, Paris, France

  • 2. Inserm UMR-S 1270, Paris, France

  • 3. Faculté des Sciences et Ingénierie, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France

  • 4. Departament de Biomedicina, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Institut de Neurociències, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

  • 5. Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain

  • 6. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), Madrid, Spain

  • 7. Production and Validation Center of Advanced Therapies (Creatio), Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Article metrics

View details

53

Citations

26,6k

Views

5,4k

Downloads

Abstract

Pyk2 is a non-receptor tyrosine kinase highly enriched in forebrain neurons. Pyk2 is closely related to focal adhesion kinase (FAK), which plays an important role in sensing cell contacts with extracellular matrix and other extracellular signals controlling adhesion and survival. Pyk2 shares some of FAK’s characteristics including recruitment of Src-family kinases after autophosphorylation, scaffolding by interacting with multiple partners, and activation of downstream signaling pathways. Pyk2, however, has the unique property to respond to increases in intracellular free Ca2+, which triggers its autophosphorylation following stimulation of various receptors including glutamate NMDA receptors. Pyk2 is dephosphorylated by the striatal-enriched phosphatase (STEP) that is highly expressed in the same neuronal populations. Pyk2 localization in neurons is dynamic, and altered following stimulation, with post-synaptic and nuclear enrichment. As a signaling protein Pyk2 is involved in multiple pathways resulting in sometimes opposing functions depending on experimental models. Thus Pyk2 has a dual role on neurites and dendritic spines. With Src family kinases Pyk2 participates in postsynaptic regulations including of NMDA receptors and is necessary for specific types of synaptic plasticity and spatial memory tasks. The diverse functions of Pyk2 are also illustrated by its role in pathology. Pyk2 is activated following epileptic seizures or ischemia-reperfusion and may contribute to the consequences of these insults whereas Pyk2 deficit may contribute to the hippocampal phenotype of Huntington’s disease. Pyk2 gene, PTK2B, is associated with the risk for late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Studies of underlying mechanisms indicate a complex contribution with involvement in amyloid toxicity and tauopathy, combined with possible functional deficits in neurons and contribution in microglia. A role of Pyk2 has also been proposed in stress-induced depression and cocaine addiction. Pyk2 is also important for the mobility of astrocytes and glioblastoma cells. The implication of Pyk2 in various pathological conditions supports its potential interest for therapeutic interventions. This is possible through molecules inhibiting its activity or increasing it through inhibition of STEP or other means, depending on a precise evaluation of the balance between positive and negative consequences of Pyk2 actions.

Introduction

Focal adhesion kinases are cytoplasmic tyrosine kinases and scaffolding proteins involved in a wide variety of physiological and pathological processes including cell adhesion, cell migration, inflammatory responses, tumor invasiveness, neuronal development, and plasticity [reviews in Girault et al. (1999a); Schaller (2010); Walkiewicz et al. (2015); Zhu et al. (2018)]. This family of kinases encompasses two members, focal adhesion kinase (FAK, coded by the Ptk2 gene in the mouse) and proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 (Pyk2, Ptk2b gene). FAK and Pyk2 share about 45% amino acid sequence identity and 65% similarity (Avraham et al., 1995; Sasaki et al., 1995) but display very distinct expression patterns and some distinct properties. Whereas FAK is expressed in all tissues since early development, Pyk2 expression increases during the 3 weeks after birth in rat (Menegon et al., 1999). The full-length form of Pyk2 is highly expressed in the central nervous system (Avraham et al., 1995; Sasaki et al., 1995; Menegon et al., 1999). It is highly enriched in the pyramidal neurons of the hippocampus and to a lesser degree of the cerebral cortex, and also in the lateral septum, the thalamus, the amygdala, and the striatum (Menegon et al., 1999; Sheehan et al., 2003). Pyk2 is predominantly expressed in neurons but is also present in astrocytes (Cazaubon et al., 1997; Giralt et al., 2016). Pyk2 is highly expressed in monocytes and tissue-resident macrophages including osteoclasts (Duong et al., 1998) and microglial cells (Combs et al., 1999; Tian et al., 2000). In neurons, Pyk2 is regulated by neuronal activity and involved in synaptic plasticity (Girault et al., 1999a; Salter and Kalia, 2004). Mutant knockout mice without Pyk2 grow and breed well under laboratory conditions (Okigaki et al., 2003; Giralt et al., 2016) and the gross anatomy of their nervous system is normal (Giralt et al., 2016) showing that Pyk2 is not essential or can be functionally replaced possibly by FAK. However, recent insights have been provided by the study of the nervous system in Pyk2 mutant mice and its role in multiple pathological conditions, including neurodegenerative diseases. Here we review the properties and function of Pyk2 in the central nervous system with a focus on its role in synaptic function and dysfunction.

Pyk2 a Multifunctional Protein Kinase With Scaffolding Properties

Pyk2 is a 1009-amino acid, 110-kDa protein (Lev et al., 1995) that was independently discovered in several laboratories in different cellular models, and hence it is also known as fakB (Kanner et al., 1994), cell adhesion kinase β [CAKβ (Sasaki et al., 1995)], related adhesion focal tyrosine kinase (RAFTK) (Avraham et al., 1995), and calcium-dependent protein-tyrosine kinase (CADTK) (Yu et al., 1996). Pyk2 encompasses several well-defined structural domains: an N-terminal FERM (4.1/ezrin/radixin/moesin) domain (Chishti et al., 1998; Girault et al., 1998, 1999b), a central tyrosine kinase domain, and a C-terminal focal adhesion targeting domain (FAT) (Hildebrand et al., 1993; Figure 1A). The short linker of 43 residues in mouse sequence between the FERM and kinase domains contains a proline-rich motif (PR1) and the autophosphorylation site, Tyr402. The longer linker of 171 residues in the mouse sequence between the kinase and FAT domain (referred below to as kinase-FAT linker, KFL) includes 2 additional proline-rich sequences (PR2 and PR3). The KFL region encompasses the most divergent sequence between FAK and Pyk2. The structure of the FERM (PDB ID 4EKU), kinase (Han et al., 2009), and FAT (Lulo et al., 2009) domains of Pyk2 has been determined by X-ray crystallography (Figure 1B) and is, as expected based on high sequence identity, very similar to that of corresponding domains in FAK. In contrast, the linkers appear to be disordered flexible regions important for Pyk2 interactions and regulation. In addition to the main full-length form of Pyk2, two protein isoforms encoded by the same gene have been described (Figure 1A). The first isoform is a splice variant expressed in hematopoietic cells, which lacks an exon encoding 42 amino acids (739–780 in rat) in KFL, between PR2 and PR3 (Dikic et al., 1998; Xiong et al., 1998). The second Pyk2 isoform, presumably transcribed from an internal initiation site, lacks the FERM and kinase domains and is referred to as Pyk2-related non-kinase (PRNK) (Xiong et al., 1998) or CRNK (Li et al., 1999). It consists of the 228 C-terminal residues of Pyk2 fused to nine unique N-terminal amino acids (Xiong et al., 1998; Figure 1A). PRNK is expressed in several tissues including the brain and may act as an endogenous regulator of Pyk2 activity (Xiong et al., 1998). Numerous proteins interacting with Pyk2 have been identified, including many also interacting with FAK. For some of these partners good evidence supports a direct interaction with Pyk2 (Table 1), whereas for others the interaction is likely to be indirect or insufficiently characterized (Table 2). Many of the direct interactions are mediated by partners’ Src-homology 3 (SH3) domain binding to Pyk2 PR motifs, while some others depend on Src-homology 2 (SH2) domain binding to specific phosphorylated tyrosine residues in Pyk2 sequence and are triggered by its activation (Table 1). Therefore Pyk2 is considered to be a scaffolding protein with multiple protein-protein interactions.

FIGURE 1

TABLE 1

PartnerPartner binding regionBinding site in Pyk2CommentsReferences
ArgBP2SH3APR2 and/or PR3PC12, HEK293T; co-IP, GST pull-down; complex with Pyk2, CblHaglund et al. (2004)
ASAP1 / DEF-1 / PIP2-dependent ARF1 GAPSH3PR2 and/or PR3Rat brain, HEK293, PC12; Pyk2 P717A or P859A reduces ASAP1 phosphorylationKruljac-Letunic et al. (2003)
ASAP2 / PAG3 / PAPSH3?Andreev et al. (1999)
BCAR1 / p130casSH3PR2 and/or PR3Astier et al. (1997); Manie et al. (1997); Ohba et al. (1998); Anfosso et al. (2001); Takahashi et al. (2003)
Related to p130Cas: embryonal Fyn-associated substrate (EFS)/ SINSH3670–792Interacts more with FAK than Pyk2Ohba et al. (1998)
Related to p130Cas: enhancer of filamentation 1 (hEF1 / NEDD9 / CasL)SH3PR2 and/or PR3Similar to p130-CasManie et al. (1997)
CalmodulinWith Ca2+FERM, kinase, KFLMultiple, see textKohno et al. (2008); Xie et al. (2008); Vomaske et al. (2010)
Disks large homolog 3 (DLG3) / Synapse-associated protein 102 (SAP102)SH3PR2 and/or PR3Seabold et al. (2003)
Disks large homolog 4 (DLG4) / PSD-95SH3PR2 and/or PR3Requirement of the proline-rich region of Pyk2 for binding to PSD-95 and SAP102Seabold et al. (2003)
FGFR-2, -3cC-terKinase domain?Meyer et al. (2004)
GelsolinC-terPR3HEK293, co-IP formation of osteoclastic actin ringsWang et al. (2003)
Graf1C (RhoA GTPase-activating protein)SH3PR3 > PR2Pyk2 inhibits Graf1c (requires kinase activity)Lee et al. (2019)
Grb2SH2pTyr881Grb2/Ras/Raf/MEK activates ERK1/2 after short treatment of GT1-7 cells with GnRHLi et al. (1996); Ganju et al. (1997); Blaukat et al. (1999); Bruzzaniti et al. (2009); Okitsu-Sakurayama et al. (2018)
Grm1, metabotropic glutamate receptor 1, mGluR12nd intracellular loop, C-ter tailPyk2 displaces Gαq/11 from the receptor and activates ERKNicodemo et al. (2010)
Grm5, metabotropic glutamate receptor 5, mGluR52nd intracellular loop, C-ter tailSimilar effects as Grm1?Nicodemo et al. (2010)
Integrin beta-3 / CD61 / GP3aC-ter 17 aaN-terminalPyk2 downstream of β3; in vitro bindingPfaff and Jurdic (2001)
Megakaryocyte-associated tyrosine-protein kinase / CsK homologous kinase (CHK) / MATKSH2pY402CHK inhibits Pyk2 phosphorylation; co-IPMcShan et al. (2002)
Membrane-associated phosphatidylinositol transfer protein 1, 2, 3 / PITPnm 1, 2, 3 / NIR-2, -3, -1/RdgB-homologsC-terminalFERMYeast two-hybrid assay; binding, co-IP, Pyk2 substratesLev et al. (1999)
Methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 2 (MBD2)MBD domainFAT?Decreases MBD2 association with HDAC1 and methyl CpG site; binding, co-IPLuo et al. (2009)
Nephrocystin-1, -4N-ter, SH3PR3Complex with p130Cas, tensinBenzing et al. (2001); Mollet et al. (2005)
PaxillinLD domainsFATHiregowdara et al. (1997); Matsuya et al. (1998); Zheng et al. (1998); Ivankovic-Dikic et al. (2000); Anfosso et al. (2001); Vanarotti et al. (2014)
Leupaxin (LIM domains, LD, similar to paxillin)LDFATComplex with PTP-PEST; binding, co-IPLipsky et al. (1998); Sahu et al. (2007); Vanarotti et al. (2016)
HIC-5 (LIM domains, LD, similar to paxillin)LDFATBinding, co-IPMatsuya et al. (1998); Wang et al. (2002)
PLC-γ1, -γ2C-ter SH2 and SH3pTyr and/or PRComplex with β3 integrin, PLC-γ, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinaseNakamura I. et al. (2001)
Protein kinase MAP4K4 (mitogen-activated protein kinase 4)C-terminal citron homology domain (CNH)FERMRole in glioma cell migrationLoftus et al. (2013)
PTK AblSH2pTyr881Complex with pl90 RhoGAP (pi90), RasGAP, c-Abl, pl30cas, paxillin.Zrihan-Licht et al. (2004)
PTK Fyn / p59-FynSH2pTyr402Ganju et al. (1997); Qian et al. (1997); Marie-Cardine et al. (1999); Katagiri et al. (2000); Li and Gotz (2018)
PTK Lck / p56-LckSH2Co-IPGanju et al. (1997); Qian et al. (1997)
PTK Lyn / p56-LynSH2?Yamasaki et al. (2001)
PTK Src / p60-SrcSH2, SH3?pTyr402, PR1?Dikic et al. (1996); Duong et al. (1998); Kumar et al. (1999); Keely et al. (2000); Sanjay et al. (2001); Faccio et al. (2003); Lakkakorpi et al. (2003); Bruzzaniti et al. (2009); Hum et al. (2014)
PTK Yes (c-Yes / p61-Yes)SH2?Pancreatic acinar cellsSancho et al. (2012)
PTK ZAP-70SH2?Katagiri et al. (2000)
PTP non-receptor type 11 (SHPTP2 / SHP2)Not the SH2 domainpTyr402Pyk2 is a substrate for SHPTP2 in response to dexamethasone and IL-6Chauhan et al. (2000)
PTP non-receptor type 5 / Striatum-enriched protein-tyrosine phosphatase (PTPN5 / STEP)PR2 and KIM domains of STEP61671–694Dephosphorylates pY402Xu et al. (2012)
Proto-oncogene vav (VAV1)SH3 (605–662) and SH3 (786–844)PR?Complex with ZAP-70Katagiri et al. (2000)
FAK family kinase–interacting protein of 200 kD (FIP200) / RB1-inducible coiled-coil protein 1C-terKinase domainYeast 2-hybrid, co-IP, FIP200 inhibits Pyk2Ueda et al. (2000)
RNA-binding protein EWS (EWSR1)N-ter656–797Co-IP, pull-downFelsch et al. (1999)
SAP90/PSD-95-associated protein 3 (SAPAP3) / Disks large-associated protein 3 (DAP3)C-ter (436–977)Yeast 2-hybrid (FAK), GST-pulldownBongiorno-Borbone et al. (2005)
Src kinase-associated phosphoprotein 2 (SKAP2) / Pyk2/RAFTK-associated protein (PRAP)SH3C-ter regionYeast 2-hybrid, co-IP, may associate Pyk2 and α-synucleinTakahashi et al. (2003)
Suppressor of cytokine signaling 2 (SOCS2); SOCS3SH2pY402SOCS2 induces proteasome-mediated degradation pPyk2 via ubiquitinationZhang et al. (2008); Lee et al. (2010)

Protein partners very likely or shown to interact directly with Pyk2.

Co-IP, co-immunoprecipitation; GST, glutathione-S transferase; KIM, kinase interaction motif; LD, leucine-aspartic acid motif; LIM, acronym of the three genes in which the domain was first identified: LIN-11, Isl-1 and MEC-3; PR, proline-rich motif; PTK, protein tyrosine kinase; PTP, protein tyrosine phosphatase; SH2, SH3, Src-homology 2, 3. Question marks indicate interacting domains that are not directly identified but very likely involved based on similarity with other characterized interactions.

TABLE 2

PartnerCommentsReference
α1-actin, α2-actin, β-actinpUS28-expressing U373 or RSMC; IP, tandem MSVomaske et al. (2010)
Abl-interactor-2pUS28-expressing U373; IP, tandem MS; low levelsVomaske et al. (2010)
AF-17pUS28-expressing RSMC; IP, tandem MSVomaske et al. (2010)
Alpha-1,3/1,6-mannosyltransferase / ALG2Co-precipitation of FAK, Pyk2Schmidt et al. (2003)
Annexin VI / annexin A6COS-1, Rat-1; GST pull-down, co-IP; complex with Fyn, Pyk2, p120GAPChow et al. (2000)
ARF GTPase-activating protein GIT1 / CAT-1Ko et al. (2003)
BiPpUS28-expressing U373; IP, tandem MSVomaske et al. (2010)
Copine-5pUS28-expressing U373; IP, tandem MS; low levelsVomaske et al. (2010)
DynaminPossibly mediated by Grb2Bruzzaniti et al. (2009)
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase / Cbl /RING finger protein 56Osteoclasts, PC12, HEK293; co-IP; contributes to Pyk2 degradation. Involves Cbl C-terminal regionSanjay et al. (2001); Schmidt et al. (2003); Haglund et al. (2004); Fan et al. (2014)
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase CBLB / Cbl-bMGC803; co-IP; contributes to Pyk2 degradationFan et al. (2014)
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase NEDD4Pyk2 and FAKVerma et al. (2017)
EGFR / ErbB-1Pyk2 and FAK, neurite outgrowth regulationIvankovic-Dikic et al. (2000); Keely et al. (2000)
ErbB-2 / HER2 / CD340Pyk2 mediates activation of MAP kinase by neuregulins. Involves Pyk2 pY402Zrihan-Licht et al. (2000)
ErbB-3 / HER3PYK2 regulates the degradation of HER3van der Horst et al. (2005); Verma et al. (2017)
F-actin capping proteins-a1, -a2, and –bpUS28-expressing RSMC; IP, tandem MS; low levelsVomaske et al. (2010)
GPIb-β; GPVIHuman platelets; co-IP; indirectArthur et al. (2011)
Grin2a, glutamate receptor ionotropic NMDA 2A, GluN2A, NR2ASee textLiu et al. (2001); Seabold et al. (2003)
Grin2b, glutamate receptor ionotropic NMDA 2B, GluN2B, NR2BSee textSeabold et al. (2003)
G-protein subunit alpha-13 (Gα13)Pyk2 downstream of Gα13; Co-IPShi et al. (2000)
G-protein subunit beta-5 (Gβ5)pUS28-expressing RSMC; IP, tandem MS; low levelsVomaske et al. (2010)
Hsc70pUS28-expressing U373; IP, tandem MSVomaske et al. (2010)
Integrator complex subunit 6pUS28-expressing U373; IP, tandem MSVomaske et al. (2010)
Integrin beta-1 / CD29 / MDF2Possibly through PI3KMelikova et al. (2004)
Integrin beta-2 / CD18 / MF17Pyk2 downstream of β2 not associatedYan and Novak (1999); Miura et al. (2000); Evangelista et al. (2007)
Interleukin-7 receptor alpha (IL-7R-alpha)Increased by IL-7Benbernou et al. (2000)
Janus kinase 1 (JAK1)Increased by IL-7Benbernou et al. (2000)
Janus kinase 2 (JAK2)Pyk2 associated with and downstream of Jak2; co-IPTakaoka et al. (1999); Frank et al. (2002)
Janus kinase 3 (JAK3)Increased by IL-2; co-IPMiyazaki et al. (1998)
KSR-2pUS28-expressing RSMC; IP, tandem MS low levelsVomaske et al. (2010)
Microtubule associated protein TauTau Pyk2-substrateDourlen et al. (2017); Li and Gotz (2018)
MortalinpUS28-expressing U373; IP, tandem MSVomaske et al. (2010)
Myosin light chain-6pUS28-expressing RSMC; IP, tandem MS low levelsVomaske et al. (2010)
Myosin-9pUS28-expressing U373; IP, tandem MSVomaske et al. (2010)
N-acetyltransferase-10pUS28-expressing U373; IP, tandem MSVomaske et al. (2010)
Nectin-3pUS28-expressing U373; IP, tandem MSVomaske et al. (2010)
NFkB p105pUS28-expressing RSMC; IP, tandem MS low levelsVomaske et al. (2010)
NIM1 kinasepUS28-expressing U373; IP, tandem MSVomaske et al. (2010)
Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase regulatory subunit alpha (PIK3R1 / PI3K-p85)Complex with integrin beta-1 / CD29 / MDF2 Co-IPMelikova et al. (2004)
Potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 2 (KCNA2 / Kv1.2 / NGK1)Pyk2 phosphorylates and may inhibit Kv1.2; co-IPByron and Lucchesi (2002)
Programmed cell death 6-interacting protein (PDCD6-interacting protein) / ALG-2-interacting protein 1 (AIP1 /Alix)Complex with SETA/CIN85/Ruk and AIP1; HEK293 cells; co-IPSchmidt et al. (2003)
Protein kinase C, PKC-alphaComplex with β1-integrin and PI3K; myeloma cells co-IPPodar et al. (2002)
Protein kinase C, PKC-deltaPancreatic acinar cells, co-IPWrenn (2001)
PTK SYKComplexes with Syk, SHP1, and Grb2, with β2 integrinGanju et al. (2000); Miura et al. (2000)
PTP non-receptor type 11 (SHPTP2 / SHP2)Pyk2 substrate of SHPTP2; interaction involves pY402 but not SHP2 SH2Chauhan et al. (2000)
PTP non-receptor type 12 (PTP-PEST / PTPG1)PTP-PEST dephosphorylates pY402, pY579 and pY580Lyons et al. (2001)
PTP non-receptor type 6 (SHPTP1 / SHP1)SHPTP1 prevents Pyk2 phosphorylation; co-IPKumar et al. (1999); Ganju et al. (2000)
Ras GTPase-activating protein 1 (RasGAP / p120GAP)Complex with pl90 RhoGAP (pi90), RasGAP, c-Abl, pl30cas, paxillin; C2 domain of RasGAPChow et al. (2000); Zrihan-Licht et al. (2000)
Rho GTPase-activating protein 5 (p190RhoGAP)Complex with pl90 RhoGAP (pi90), RasGAP, c-Abl, pl30cas, paxillinZrihan-Licht et al. (2000)
Rhophilin-2pUS28-expressing RSMC; IP, tandem MS; low levelsVomaske et al. (2010)
RTEL-1pUS28-expressing RSMC; IP, tandem MSVomaske et al. (2010)
SH3 domain-containing kinase-binding protein 1 (CD2BP3 / SETA / RUK / CIN85)Complex with SETA/CIN85/Ruk and AIP1; HEK293 cells; co-IPSchmidt et al. (2003)
TCF-4pUS28-expressing U373; IP, tandem MSVomaske et al. (2010)
PTP (TFG) Trk-fused genepUS28-expressing RSMC; IP, tandem MS; low levelsVomaske et al. (2010)
TNF receptor-associated factor 4 (Traf4)Complex with Hic-5Wu et al. (2005); Arthur et al. (2011)
TriopUS28-expressing RSMC; IP, tandem MS; low levelsVomaske et al. (2010)
Tropomodulin-3pUS28-expressing RSMC; IP, tandem MS; low levelsVomaske et al. (2010)
Tropomyosin-a1, a3, a4, -bpUS28-expressing RSMC; IP, tandem MS; low levelsVomaske et al. (2010)
Tubulin-b-2CpUS28-expressing RSMC; IP, tandem MS; low levelsVomaske et al. (2010)
USP6 oncogenepUS28-expressing U373; IP, tandem MSVomaske et al. (2010)
VEGFR-1 / FLT-1Podar et al. (2002)
VimentinpUS28-expressing RSMC; IP, tandem MS; low levelsVomaske et al. (2010)

Protein partners possibly interacting indirectly with Pyk2.

IP, immunoprecipitation; MS, mass spectrometry; PTK, protein tyrosine kinase; PTP, protein tyrosine phosphatase; RSMC, rectal smooth muscle cells.

Pyk2 Autophosphorylation and Regulation of by Ca2+

Autophosphorylation of Pyk2 and Interactions With Src-Family Kinases

The most striking structural feature of Pyk2 is the presence of a central tyrosine kinase domain and many studies explored its regulation. Activation of protein tyrosine phosphorylation by depolarization and neurotransmitters was reported in neurons in culture and hippocampal slices more than 25 years ago (Siciliano et al., 1994). Two of the main proteins whose phosphorylation was increased were then identified as FAK and Pyk2 (Siciliano et al., 1996). Pyk2 was initially characterized as a Ca2+-activated protein tyrosine kinase (Lev et al., 1995) and also termed calcium-dependent protein-tyrosine kinase (Yu et al., 1996). A remarkable property of FAK and Pyk2 is the existence of an autophosphorylation site in the FERM-kinase linker whose phosphorylation is an early step in the activation of these two proteins. Due to the sequence similarities between the two enzymes, the current model of Pyk2 activation is in part based on results obtained with FAK which are presumed to be also valid for Pyk2. In Pyk2 the autophosphorylated tyrosine is Tyr402, which promotes its interaction with the SH2 domain of Src-family kinases (SFKs) (Li et al., 1999). The SFKs reported to interact with Pyk2 include Src (Dikic et al., 1996; Duong et al., 1998; Kumar et al., 1999; Keely et al., 2000; Sanjay et al., 2001; Faccio et al., 2003; Lakkakorpi et al., 2003; Bruzzaniti et al., 2009; Hum et al., 2014) and Fyn (Ganju et al., 1997; Qian et al., 1997; Marie-Cardine et al., 1999; Katagiri et al., 2000; Li and Gotz, 2018), which are both widely expressed in neurons, as well as Lck (Ganju et al., 1997; Qian et al., 1997), Lyn (Yamasaki et al., 2001), and Yes (Sancho et al., 2012). Because the SH2 and SH3 domains involved in the interactions with FAK and Pyk2 are conserved among SFKs, we refer to them below as a generic family, although the detailed interactions have not been documented in all cases. SFKs are also likely to bind to the nearby PR1 motif of Pyk2 through their SH3 domain as it was shown for FAK (Thomas et al., 1998). The binding of SFKs to Pyk2 is expected to activate these enzymes by competing with the intramolecular interactions of SFK including binding of their SH2 domain to an inhibitory phosphotyrosine in their carboxy-terminal region and of their SH3 domain to a motif between the kinase and SH2 domain (Roskoski, 2015; Figure 2). SFKs can phosphorylate several residues in Pyk2, including Tyr579 and Tyr580 in its activation loop, whose phosphorylation is expected to enhance its kinase activity (Li et al., 1999). Pyk2 phosphorylation at Tyr881 can recruit the adaptor Grb2 (Felsch et al., 1998) and the tyrosine kinase Abl (Zrihan-Licht et al., 2004). The phosphorylation of Pyk2 on several tyrosine residues combined with its interaction with multiple partners triggers various signaling pathways, in part depending on the cell type. Phosphorylation of Pyk2 at Tyr402 can result from autophosphorylation and recruit SFKs as outlined above, but SFKs can phosphorylate other residues in Pyk2 independently of Tyr402 (Li et al., 1999) and also directly phosphorylate Tyr402 (Higa-Nakamine et al., 2020; Das et al., 2021). This phosphorylation by SFKs may be an indispensable primer for further autophosphorylation in some circumstances (Zhao et al., 2016). Thus there is a clear positive feedforward loop between Pyk2 and SFKs, involving their reciprocal activating interactions. This may favor their strong activation in responses to stimuli, but makes the causal relationship between these events difficult to analyze. Accordingly, in the hippocampus, Fyn plays an important role in Pyk2 tyrosine phosphorylation including at Tyr402, which is markedly decreased in basal conditions and response to stimuli in Fyn KO mice (Corvol et al., 2005).

FIGURE 2

The Role of Ca2+ in Pyk2 Activation

The mechanism by which increased intracellular Ca2+ activates Pyk2 is not fully understood but several observations provide some insights. As shown for FAK (Toutant et al., 2002; Brami-Cherrier et al., 2014) Pyk2 is autophosphorylated by an intermolecular reaction (Park et al., 2004). In inactive Pyk2, the FERM domain is likely to inhibit the kinase domain through an intramolecular interaction as proposed for FAK (Lietha et al., 2007). This interaction may also be involved in oligomer formation which promotes intermolecular autophosphorylation, whereas an excess of free FERM domain decreases autophosphorylation (Riggs et al., 2011). In the case of FAK, the existence of several intramolecular, and potentially intermolecular interactions have been identified (Lietha et al., 2007; Brami-Cherrier et al., 2014). The FAK FERM domain can dimerize through a tryptophan residue (Trp-266) that is conserved in Pyk2 (Trp-273), providing a basis for an intermolecular interaction favoring trans-autophosphorylation when the intramolecular inhibition of the kinase by the FERM domain is relieved by other factors (Brami-Cherrier et al., 2014). Whether the same scheme applies to Pyk2 and how Ca2+ contributes to relieving the inhibition exerted by the FERM domain and/or facilitates dimerization remains to be determined.

Ca2+-induced autophosphorylation is prevented by calmodulin (CaM) antagonists and direct action of Ca2+/CaM on Pyk2 has been proposed with at least two potential binding sites, one in the FERM domain (including L176-Q177) (Kohno et al., 2008) and another in the kinase domain (L514ERNKNSLKVPTLV) (Xie et al., 2008). The binding of Ca2+/CaM to the FERM domain was reported to facilitate Pyk2 dimerization, providing a potential mechanism for its autophosphorylation (Kohno et al., 2008). However, the molecular mechanisms initiated by Ca2+/CaM binding at these sites leading to intermolecular phosphorylation are not known and the existence of an additional site is plausible (Figure 2). Because Pyk2 interacts with multiple protein partners, Ca2+ can also potentially act on these partners to facilitate Pyk2 intermolecular autophosphorylation through its dimerization or clustering. For example, the SH3 domain of PSD-95 binds the Pyk2 PR3 motif (Seabold et al., 2003) and Ca2+/CaM promotes the dimerization of PSD-95 and thereby activates Pyk2 (Bartos et al., 2010). Moreover, CaM is reported to activate Src in the presence or even in the absence of Ca2+ (Stateva et al., 2015).

In addition to a direct implication of Ca2+/CaM, many reports have shown the importance of serine/threonine phosphorylation in Pyk2 regulation. Indeed, Pyk2 activation can be triggered by stimulating PKC and its activation is blocked by PKC inhibitors in various preparations (Siciliano et al., 1994; Lev et al., 1995; Siciliano et al., 1996; Hiregowdara et al., 1997). How PKC activates Pyk2 autophosphorylation is not known and may result from indirect effects, such as activation of Src (Cao et al., 2007). In some cell types, Pyk2 autophosphorylation induced by depolarization but not by G protein-coupled receptor stimulation is prevented by Ca2+/CaM-dependent protein kinase inhibitors (Zwick et al., 1999; Ginnan and Singer, 2002), indicating that this group of kinases is also capable to contribute to Pyk2 activation, directly or indirectly. Finally, inhibition of calcineurin (also known as PP2B or PPP3), a Ca2+- and Ca2+/CaM-activated serine/threonine phosphatase, also prevents depolarization-induced Pyk2 autophosphorylation (Faure et al., 2007). Although calcineurin dephosphorylates pSer778 in Pyk2, this residue is important for nuclear export of Pyk2 but not for Tyr402 phosphorylation (Faure et al., 2013) suggesting the existence of other important sites for Pyk2 activation, on either Pyk2 or other proteins involved in its regulation, including STEP (see Section 4 below). While the mechanistic aspects of Pyk2 regulation by Ca2+ are still imperfectly understood, it is striking that it is a point of convergence of multiple Ca2+-activated pathways, indicating that Pyk2 behaves as a broad sensor of Ca2+ regulation. Other signals activating Pyk2 have been reported without full elucidation of their mechanisms of action, including hyperosmotic shock (Tokiwa et al., 1996; Derkinderen et al., 1998), acidic pH (Li et al., 2004), and SUMOylation (Uzoma et al., 2018), but their relevance in neurons is not known.

Negative Regulation of Pyk2 by Tyrosine Phosphatases and Protocadherins

Termination of Pyk2 activation results from its dephosphorylation by protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs). Several PTPs active on Pyk2 have been identified in non-neuronal cells including SHP1 (Kumar et al., 1999), SHP2 (Tang et al., 2000; Halfter et al., 2005), and PTP-PEST (a.k.a. PTPN12) (Davidson and Veillette, 2001; Lyons et al., 2001). In neurons, PTPα decreases Pyk2 phosphorylation either directly or by regulating SFKs (Le et al., 2006), but the phosphatase which appears to play the most prominent role is STEP (also known as protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 5, PTPN5), which is specifically enriched in the neuronal populations highly expressing Pyk2 (Fitzpatrick and Lombroso, 2011; Lombroso et al., 2016). STEP binds to Pyk2 and catalyzes the dephosphorylation of Tyr402 (Xu et al., 2012). Phosphorylation of Pyk2 Tyr402 is increased in the hippocampus of STEP KO mice (Venkitaramani et al., 2011). STEP is negatively regulated by phosphorylation by cAMP-dependent protein kinase on a key serine residue, and activated by dephosphorylation of this residue by protein phosphatase 1 (PP1 or PPP1) which is itself activated by calcineurin (Goebel-Goody et al., 2012). These phosphorylation-dependent regulations provide an interesting possibility of crosstalk between the cAMP pathway, calcineurin, and Pyk2/SFKs. It could also contribute to the effects of calcineurin inhibitors on the autophosphorylation of Pyk2 (Faure et al., 2007). In addition to tyrosine phosphatases, endogenous inhibitors of Pyk2 have been identified specifically in the central nervous system. Among them, α- and γ-protocadherins were shown to interact with and negatively regulate Pyk2 thereby modulating synaptic connectivity (Suo et al., 2012), neuronal migration (Fan et al., 2018), and cell survival (Chen et al., 2009a). Thus the two best characterized negative regulators of Pyk2 are STEP, a phosphatase regulated by multiple signaling pathways and protocadherins.

Dynamics of Pyk2 Localization in Neurons

Pyk2 Accumulation in Post-synaptic Densities

Pyk2 is a cytoplasmic protein that can accumulate at contact or adhesion sites in specific cell types and conditions including podosomes and invadopodia [see (Eleniste and Bruzzaniti, 2012; Genna and Gil-Henn, 2018) for reviews]. In neurons, Pyk2 is rather diffusely distributed but its localization is altered after stimulation (Figure 3A). Following depolarization or activation of glutamate NMDA receptor (NMDAR) Pyk2 is rapidly clustered at post-synaptic sites in spines and this clustering is prevented in the presence of the PSD-95 SH3 domain (Bartos et al., 2010). In addition to PSD-95, postsynaptic enrichment of Pyk2 can also be facilitated by its association with other PSD proteins including the SH3 domain of SAP102 (Seabold et al., 2003) and SAPAP3 (Bongiorno-Borbone et al., 2005). As we shall see below, in the PSD Pyk2 can modify neuronal excitability by inducing the phosphorylation of ion channels (Lev et al., 1995; Felsch et al., 1998; Huang et al., 2001).

FIGURE 3

Pyk2 Cytonuclear Shuttling and Nuclear Accumulation

In addition to its stimulation-induced accumulation in PSDs, Pyk2 also shuttles between the cell nucleus and the cytoplasm (Figure 3B). In various cell lines, Pyk2 accumulates in the nucleus following mutation of Pro-859 to Ala in the PR3 motif or treatment with nuclear export inhibitor leptomycin B (Aoto et al., 2002). In transfected cells stimulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor increases Pyk2 phosphorylation and induces its nuclear accumulation (Farshori et al., 2003) and, during early development, Pyk2 is transiently localized to the nucleus (Meng et al., 2006). In hippocampal slices, neurons in culture, and PC12 cells, depolarization induces a Ca2+/CaM- and calcineurin-dependent nuclear translocation of Pyk2 (Faure et al., 2007). Interestingly, high frequency stimulation of Schaffer collaterals in hippocampal slices induces nuclear accumulation of Pyk2 in CA1 pyramidal neurons (Faure et al., 2007), suggesting it occurs in conditions known to trigger synaptic long-term potentiation (LTP, see below section “Pyk2 in Long Term Potentiation”). Pyk2 contains several nuclear import and export signals (see Figures 1, 3B), including a nuclear export motif regulated by phosphorylation at Ser778, a substrate of cAMP-dependent protein kinase and calcineurin (Faure et al., 2013). Upon depolarization, calcineurin dephosphorylates Ser778 leading to the inactivation of the nuclear export motif and the accumulation of Pyk2 in the nucleus (Faure et al., 2013). The function of Pyk2 in the nucleus remains unclear. Nuclear Pyk2 has the potential to downregulate p53 by increasing p53 ubiquitination through its FERM domain thereby favoring cell survival (Lim et al., 2008a; Lim et al., 2010). In addition, it has been shown in keratinocytes and osteocytes that FAK and Pyk2 interact with methyl-CpG-binding domain protein-2, MBD2 (Schindler et al., 2007; Hum et al., 2014). MBD2 is a methylated-DNA binding protein that recruits histone deacetylase to the DNA (Luo et al., 2009). Interaction with Pyk2 prevents MBD2 association with both HDAC1 and methyl-DNA and thereby increases gene expression (Luo et al., 2009). Whether this regulation also takes place in neurons and whether and how it affects transcription in response to signals that activate Pyk2 is not known. In particular, it will be of interest to determine whether the nuclear role of Pyk2 is targeted to specific genes or is a general modulation that alters responsiveness to more specific pathways. Because it provides a potential link between neuronal activity and transcriptional responses the role of Pyk2 in the nucleus in neurons deserves further investigation including in the context of synaptic plasticity.

Pyk2 in Synapses

Pyk2 in Neurite and Spine Formation and Maintenance

In non-neuronal cells such as osteoclasts, Pyk2 is implicated in the regulation of actin-cytoskeleton downstream of integrins through its interaction with proteins like the Crk-associated substrate p130Cas (also known as breast cancer anti-estrogen resistance protein 1, BCAR1) and paxillin, in a manner similar to FAK [review in Kong et al. (2020)]. Both FAK and Pyk2 are present in neurite growth cones (Menegon et al., 1999). The expression of the C-terminal domain of Pyk2 or FAK blocks neurite outgrowth in PC12 and SH-SY5Y cells indicating the possible implication of the FAK family in this process (Ivankovic-Dikic et al., 2000). Supporting this hypothesis, Pyk2 forms a signaling complex with Cbl, an E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase, and Arg kinase-binding protein 2 (ArgBP2), an adaptor protein, which may regulate actin to form lamellipodia in growth cones of differentiating PC12 cells following growth factor stimulation (Haglund et al., 2004). Pyk2 is also activated and associates with paxillin and bundled actin at neurite initiation sites in PC12 cells in response to nerve growth factor (NGF) (Park et al., 2000). Conversely the activation of GSK3β by Pyk2 in response to lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) contributes to neurite retraction in a neuroblastoma cell line expressing LPA1 receptor (Sayas et al., 2006). These studies in neuronal cell lines indicate that Pyk2 can participate in both neurite formation and retraction.

Studies in neurons have also outlined positive and negative effects of Pyk2 on neurites and spines. Yet it is important to mention that Pyk2 knockout mice do not display any gross defect in brain development (Giralt et al., 2017), indicating that the role of Pyk2 in this context is not major and/or that it can be replaced by FAK. Several results suggest that Pyk2 has a role downstream of integrins, especially β1-integrin, to facilitate spine formation or stability. Pyk2 together with FAK and the p130Cas/Fyn complex downstream of β1-integrin is negatively regulated by EphA4 during spine remodeling (Bourgin et al., 2007). In orbitofrontal cortex neurons, decreased β1-integrin signaling, which involves Pyk2, results in spine loss (Whyte et al., 2021). Although the role of integrins was not investigated, in Pyk2 KO mice, a decrease in spine number and PSD-95 clusters was observed in the dendrites of pyramidal CA1 hippocampal neurons in vivo and in culture (Giralt et al., 2017). In KO neurons in culture, PSD-95 clusters were rescued by reexpression of Pyk2, requiring its kinase activity, its autophosphorylation, and the presence of its C-terminal region (Giralt et al., 2017). In contrast rescue of spine density required the C-terminal region but neither kinase activity nor autophosphorylation. This latter observation raises the possibility that the positive role of Pyk2 on spines is independent of its kinase activity and recruitment of SFKs through autophosphorylation, but involves other properties of the molecule such as its scaffolding role.

In contrast, several reports provide evidence that Pyk2 can have a negative effect on spines. In hippocampal neurons in culture protocadherins control dendritic development by inhibiting Pyk2 inhibitory effect on small G protein Rac1 activity (Suo et al., 2012). In this study, a negative effect on spines of Pyk2 overexpression was observed. The negative regulation of Rac1 by Pyk2 downstream of protocadherins also impairs neuronal migration (Fan et al., 2018). Similarly, Pyk2 overexpression was shown to decrease spine formation through the inhibitory interaction of Pyk2 with Graf1c, a RhoA GTPase-activating protein (Lee et al., 2019). When Pyk2 is overexpressed or activated, RhoA activity is increased leading to actomyosin contraction and synapse loss (Lee et al., 2019).

Thus the studies of the role of Pyk2 in neuronal cell lines and neurons disclose opposing effects of Pyk2 on neurites and spine formation and/or maintenance. Pyk2 may participate in integrin-adhesion-triggered signaling with a positive effect on spines, whereas its overexpression or potentially its increased activity may result in a dysregulation of small GTPases Rac1 and RhoA leading to spine loss. The intriguing possibility that these two roles of Pyk2 on spines depend on different properties of the molecule will have to be further investigated. At any rate, these results indicate the requirement of tight control of Pyk2 for normal spine regulation.

Role of Pyk2 in the Regulation of Ion Channels

As mentioned above (section “Pyk2 Accumulation in Post-synaptic Densities”), Pyk2 can interact with PSD proteins PSD-95, SAP102, and SAP90/PSD-95-associated protein-3, SAPAP3 (Seabold et al., 2003; Bongiorno-Borbone et al., 2005), providing a basis for its enrichment near NMDAR (Figure 4). Moreover, Pyk2 is clustered in PSDs following stimulation of NMDAR (Bartos et al., 2010). Tyrosine phosphorylation of PSD-95 itself by SFKs may play a role in the recruitment of Pyk2 (Zhao et al., 2015). PSD-95 and SAP102 are MAGUK proteins (membrane-associated guanylate kinase) so named because one of their domains is similar to guanylate kinases although it is devoid of catalytic activity. These Pyk2-binding proteins encompass several PDZ domains that can bind various post-synaptic proteins including glutamate receptors subunits, in particular those from NMDAR [see (Won et al., 2017) for a review]. Pyk2 was first identified as a component of the NMDAR complex through proteomics (Husi et al., 2000). NMDAR GluN2A and GluN2B subunits COOH-terminal region is phosphorylated at several tyrosine residues by SFKs (Tyr842, −1292, −1325, and −1387 in GluN2A and Tyr1252, −1336, and −1472 in GluN2B) [reviews in Salter and Kalia (2004); Trepanier et al. (2012); Wang et al. (2014)]. The overall effect of these phosphorylations is to increase surface expression and function of the receptor. Accordingly, several reports support the role of Pyk2 in upregulating NMDA currents. The presence of Pyk2 in the patch pipette enhances NMDA currents in hippocampal neurons, an effect that requires its kinase activity (Huang et al., 2001). The activation of Pyk2 is implicated in the upregulation of NMDAR function linked to their increased surface expression, induced by stimulation of metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (mGluR1) (Heidinger et al., 2002) or of PACAP receptor 1 (Macdonald et al., 2005) as well as in the fast response to glucocorticoids (Yang et al., 2013). Interestingly it was recently shown that the increased number of synaptic NMDAR induced by BDNF results from the enhanced dendritic translation of Pyk2 (Afonso et al., 2019). Thus many studies indicate that Pyk2 and associated SFKs increase NMDAR function, an effect implicated in various types of neuromodulatory regulation of these receptors. In Pyk2 KO mice, phosphorylation of GluN2B Tyr1472 was decreased and the levels of NMDAR subunits and PSD-95 associated with PSDs were diminished as compared to wild-type mice (Giralt et al., 2017). It is not known whether Pyk2 phosphorylates NMDAR directly. Evidence suggests that the effects of Pyk2 are mediated by Src because the enhancement of NMDAR activity induced by Pyk2 overexpression is blocked by a Src peptide that does not act on Pyk2 while a dominant-negative mutant of Pyk2 does not affect the potentiation of NMDAR produced by Src activation (Huang et al., 2001). In neurons derived from human induced pluripotent cells, Fyn appears to be the main kinase phosphorylating GluN2B (Zhang et al., 2016). It is thus likely that Src and Fyn are downstream of Pyk2 in the regulation of NMDAR.

FIGURE 4

In contrast to the extensive study of NMDAR phosphorylation, few reports have examined the effects of tyrosine phosphorylation on AMPA receptors (AMPAR). The GluA2 subunit is phosphorylated on Tyr876 near the COOH-terminus by Src and this phosphorylation is increased in response to glutamate agonists (Hayashi and Huganir, 2004). This phosphorylation appears to facilitate activity-induced endocytosis of AMPAR. No alteration in AMPAR was observed in Pyk2 KO mice (Giralt et al., 2017). It is not known whether Pyk2 is implicated in the regulation of GluA2 Tyr876.

In addition to the regulation of glutamate receptors, Pyk2 can also contribute to the regulation of specific potassium channels. Pyk2 is involved in the downregulation of Kv1.2 channels by stimulating their endocytosis, including in response to muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (Chrm1) (Lev et al., 1995; Felsch et al., 1998; Hyun et al., 2013), leading to depolarization and opening of L-type voltage-sensitive Ca2+ channels in smooth muscle cells (Byron and Lucchesi, 2002). In contrast, Pyk2 has been reported to enhance the Ca2+-dependent activity of BKCa channels in non-neuronal cells (Ling et al., 2004). In neurons, these channels can be implicated in spike frequency adaptation (Ha and Cheong, 2017), but the role of Pyk2 in this context has not been investigated. Thus, the currently best-characterized effects of Pyk2 in neurons correspond to increased excitability and increased response to excitatory stimuli through the regulation of Kv1.2 channels and NMDAR.

Pyk2 in Synaptic Plasticity

Pyk2 in Long Term Potentiation

Long-term potentiation of synaptic transmission between Schaffer collaterals and CA1 pyramidal neurons of the hippocampus is arguably the most extensively studied form of synaptic plasticity (Nicoll, 2017). This LTP is impaired by tyrosine kinase inhibitors (O’Dell et al., 1991; Huang and Hsu, 1999) and in Fyn KO mice, but not in Src-, Yes-, or Abl-deficient mice (Grant et al., 1992). Yet, acute and specific blockade of Src prevents LTP at the same synapses (Lu et al., 1998). Because depolarization or treatment with glutamate agonists increases the phosphorylation of Pyk2 in neurons in culture and hippocampal slices (Siciliano et al., 1994; Siciliano et al., 1996), it was proposed that Pyk2 could play a role in synaptic plasticity (Girault et al., 1999a). This hypothesis has been tested in various conditions with apparently contradictory results. In CA1 pyramidal neurons of acutely prepared hippocampal slices, the presence of Pyk2 in the whole-cell recording patch pipette enhances synaptic responses through an SFK-dependent mechanism and occludes LTP induced by tetanic stimulation (two 500-ms trains of 100 Hz stimuli, separated by 10 s) (Huang et al., 2001). In this model the presence of kinase-dead Pyk2 prevents LTP induction. Disruption of the interaction between Pyk2 and PSD-95 also abolishes LTP induced by a tetanic stimulation (two 500-ms trains of 100 Hz stimuli, separated by 10 s) at synapses between Schaffer collaterals and CA1 pyramidal neurons in acute hippocampal slices (Bartos et al., 2010). In contrast, the knockdown of Pyk2 in hippocampal organotypic slices did not alter LTP induced by pairing 3 Hz stimulation (200 pulses) with postsynaptic depolarization to 0 mV (Hsin et al., 2010). In slices from Pyk2 KO mice, LTP at synapses between Schaffer collaterals and CA1 neurons induced by high-frequency stimulation (HFS, five 1-s trains of 100 Hz stimuli separated by 10 s) was abolished (Giralt et al., 2017). In a different mouse line with a similar Pyk2 KO mutation, however, the LTP induced at the same synapses by a theta-burst stimulation (TBS) protocol (10 bursts of 4 shocks at 100 Hz with an interburst interval of 200 ms) was identical to that observed in wild type mice (Salazar et al., 2019). Thus, depending on the reports the role of Pyk2 at Schaffer collaterals and CA1 pyramidal neurons appears either important or negligible. Since these various studies used different protocols to induce LTP, this question was recently re-examined by comparison of the HFS and TBS protocols in the same mouse line. In both Pyk2 constitutive KO mice and in mice in which Pyk2 deletion was induced specifically in CA1 neurons, LTP induced by HFS was impaired whereas LTP induced by TBS was unaltered, as compared to wild-type control mice (Mastrolia et al., 2021). Importantly, all the investigators who found a role of Pyk2 in LTP used an HFS induction protocol (Huang et al., 2001; Bartos et al., 2010; Giralt et al., 2017), whereas those who did not find any used either TBS (Salazar et al., 2019) or a low-frequency stimulation (Hsin et al., 2010). These combined results allow us to conclude that Pyk2 is important for LTP induced by HFS but not by TBS or low-frequency protocols.

Remarkably, the LTP that was blocked by tyrosine kinase inhibitors (O’Dell et al., 1991; Huang and Hsu, 1999), Fyn KO (Grant et al., 1992), or Src inhibition (Lu et al., 1998) was also induced by HFS. In contrast, LTP induced by 40 EPSPs evoked at 1 Hz with depolarization of the postsynaptic cell was not altered in Fyn KO as compared to wild type mice (Grant et al., 1992). This suggests that Pyk2 and tyrosine phosphorylation by SFKs are required for HFS-induced LTP and not for other types of LTP. The specific role attributed to Fyn (Grant et al., 1992) in CA1 is in agreement with the observation that Fyn is the main contributor in Pyk2 regulation in hippocampal slices (Corvol et al., 2005) although both Fyn and Src are associated with NMDAR complex (Husi et al., 2000). There is no evidence that tyrosine phosphorylation is involved in the upregulation of AMPAR (see above the discussion of AMPAR tyrosine phosphorylation in section “Role of Pyk2 in the Regulation of Ion Channels” and also below section “Pyk2 in Long Term Depression”), which are the post-synaptic substrates of LTP expression. Therefore it is likely that the contribution of Pyk2 and Fyn to LTP is linked to the phosphorylation of NMDAR and/or associated proteins under conditions of intense tetanic stimulation which triggers strictly Ca2+-dependent LTP (Nicoll, 2017).

The selective involvement of Pyk2 and SFKs in a specific type of LTP, observed in rather non-physiological conditions after HFS stimulation, raises the question of its biological significance. NMDAR subunit GluN2b phosphorylation at Tyr1472 is increased by HFS in conditions that induce LTP (Huang et al., 2001; Nakazawa et al., 2001), and this phosphorylation is important for LTP induced by HFS (Chen et al., 2014; Tang et al., 2015). Tyrosine phosphorylation of NMDAR increases its surface expression (Yaka et al., 2002; Prybylowski et al., 2005). In contrast, agonist stimulation, through a mechanism independent from ion fluxes but involving the glycine site, induces tyrosine dephosphorylation and endocytosis of NMDAR (Vissel et al., 2001; Nong et al., 2003). Therefore one hypothesis is that stimulation of NMDAR during HFS would induce its endocytosis and decrease the response, unless Pyk2 and associated SFKs exert the opposite effect and maintain a sufficient surface level of NMDAR for LTP induction. In support of this hypothesis, Pyk2 injection increases NMDAR currents without changing channel properties (Huang et al., 2001) and increases NMDAR surface expression (Afonso et al., 2019). Moreover, HFS-induced LTP is accompanied by an increased surface expression of NMDAR, which is blocked by an SFK inhibitor (Grosshans et al., 2002). Alternatively or in addition to this putative mechanism that would require to be experimentally tested, tyrosine phosphorylation of other Pyk2/SFK substrates, yet to be identified, might be a limiting factor in these LTP conditions. Following TBS, NMDARs are also phosphorylated on tyrosine (Pitcher et al., 2011) but additional mechanisms and signaling pathways are recruited which participate in LTP including GABA disinhibition (Larson and Munkacsy, 2015) and recruitment of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase (Abel et al., 1997; Nguyen and Kandel, 1997; Woo et al., 2003), which may exert an inhibitory role on Pyk2 activation (Alier and Morris, 2005). It is possible that in TBS-like conditions the agonist-induced NMDAR endocytosis is less pronounced than with HFS and that there is no need for a compensatory Pyk2/SFK-dependent increase in NMDAR surface expression.

Pyk2 in Long Term Depression

In addition to its role in LTP, Pyk2 is also involved in the long-term depression (LTD) of synaptic transmission. LTD induced in hippocampal CA1 slices in organotypic culture by pairing 200 pulses at 1 Hz stimulation with depolarization of the postsynaptic cell to −40 mV was blocked by Pyk2 knockdown (Hsin et al., 2010). Similarly, LTD induced at Schaffer collaterals-CA1 synapses by 900 pulses at 1 Hz in slices from Pyk2 KO mice was abolished (Salazar et al., 2019). The molecular mechanisms of the role of Pyk2 in LTD have not been worked out in detail. GluA2 is phosphorylated on Tyr876 by SFKs in a Ca2+-independent manner and not directly by Pyk2 (Hayashi and Huganir, 2004). Tyr876 is located in a region that contains several tyrosine residues and is globally required for regulated AMPAR endocytosis and LTD (Ahmadian et al., 2004). Mutation of Tyr876 decreases surface expression, synaptic targeting, and agonist-induced internalization of GluA2, while phosphorylation of Tyr876 decreases its interaction with glutamate receptor-interacting protein 1/2 (GRIP1/2), indicating the existence of different modulation of basal and stimulation-induced dynamics of GluA2 (Hayashi and Huganir, 2004). Overexpression of a peptide encompassing the C-terminal sequence of GluA2 with 3 tyrosine residues prevents LTD induced in vivo in CA1 by paired stimuli (200 pairs at 1 Hz with an intra-pair interval of 10 ms) and LTD potentiated by stress (Fox et al., 2007). This GluA2 sequence with 3 tyrosine residues interacts with the protein BRAG2, which is a guanine-nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for the coat-recruitment GTPase Arf6 involved in endocytosis (Scholz et al., 2010). The overall evidence suggests a role of dephosphorylation in endocytosis and LTD. mGluR-dependent LTD, induced by (RS)-3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG) is accompanied by GluA2 tyrosine dephosphorylation (Gladding et al., 2009) and is blocked by PTP inhibitors (Moult et al., 2006). Phosphorylation of Tyr876 on GluA2 prevents the activation of BRAG2 GEF activity, providing a basis for the role of dephosphorylation in endocytosis and LTD (Scholz et al., 2010). In cerebellar Purkinje cells, Tyr876 dephosphorylation by PTP-MEG recruited by GluD2-containing AMPAR is required for phosphorylation of Ser880 by PKC, leading to the replacement of anchoring proteins from GRIP to PICK1 and allowing AMPAR endocytosis during LTD (Kohda et al., 2013). Thus all these results support a role of GluA2 dephosphorylation, and not phosphorylation, in LTD and cannot account for the requirement of Pyk2. Interestingly, Pyk2 is known to be activated downstream of transient receptor potential melastatin 2 (TRPM2) in non-neuronal cells (Belrose and Jackson, 2018), and Trpm2 is a channel important for NMDAR-dependent LTD at CA3-CA1 synapses (Xie et al., 2011), but the role of Pyk2 in connection with TRPM2 has not been investigated in the hippocampus. Besides a partial contribution of its kinase activity, it has also been proposed that the scaffolding properties of Pyk2 are important for its role in LTD (Hsin et al., 2010), but the involved partners have not been identified. Thus, although it is clear that LTD is altered when Pyk2 is absent (Hsin et al., 2010; Salazar et al., 2019), the precise underlying molecular mechanisms accounting for this role are not yet known.

Pyk2 in Intrinsic Excitability Plasticity

The regulation of Kv1.2 by SFKs and Pyk2 can play a role in the regulation of intrinsic excitability plasticity. In CA3 pyramidal neurons, a conditioning train of 20 action potentials (APs) at 10 Hz causes a persistent reduction in the input conductance and an acceleration of the AP onset time, corresponding to LTP of intrinsic excitability (LTP-IE) (Hyun et al., 2013). It depends on back-propagating APs to distal apical dendrites and the presence of Kv1.2 channels. LTP-IE is prevented by the inhibition of Kv1.2 endocytosis or of protein tyrosine kinase activity (Hyun et al., 2013). Although Kv1.2 endocytosis requires its phosphorylation, which is controlled by Pyk2 (Lev et al., 1995; Felsch et al., 1998), the role of Pyk2 in LTP-IE could not be directly confirmed due to interfering effects of Pyk2 knockdown in that preparation (Hyun et al., 2013). In conclusion, Pyk2 is involved in LTP induced by HFS, in LTD, and probably in LTP-IE, but the details of its mechanism of action in these various conditions are not fully elucidated.

Pyk2 in Learning and Memory

The role of Pyk2 in behavior has been investigated using Pyk2-deficient mice. Pyk2 KO mice display a deficit in the spontaneous alternation and the novel object location (NOL) tests (Giralt et al., 2017). These tests explore short-term spatial memory after a single brief training session. Spontaneous alternation evaluates the ability of the animal to remember the previously explored arm of a Y maze 2 h after training. NOL measures the preference for exploring the object displaced among two identical ones, 24 h after a first exposure. In both tests visual cues are provided by geometrical patterns around the apparatus. A similar deficit in NOL was observed in mice with an AAV-induced deletion of Pyk2 in the dorsal hippocampus CA1 region (Giralt et al., 2017). The deficit in NOL was reproduced in other batches of mice from the same KO line and was rescued by targeted bilateral re-expression of Pyk2 in neurons of dorsal hippocampus CA1 (Mastrolia et al., 2021). NOL is a sensitive test that requires the integrity of the dorsal hippocampus [see (Aggleton and Nelson, 2020) for a recent review]. In contrast, the novel object recognition test (NOR) is a single-session training test similar to NOL except that instead of displacement of an object it is replaced by a different one without external visual cues. This test that does not explore spatial memory and involves several brain regions and neurotransmitter systems (Dere et al., 2007), was not altered in Pyk2 KO mice (Giralt et al., 2018; Salazar et al., 2019). Moreover, the spatial memory evaluated in the Morris water maze, a paradigm dependent on the dorsal hippocampus but based on repeated trial sessions and possibly modulated by a stressful component (Cunningham et al., 2009) was also unaltered in Pyk2-deficient mice (Salazar et al., 2019). Thus, it appears that Pyk2 deficit alters only relatively weak forms of spatial memory induced by a single brief exposure and involving dorsal hippocampus, whereas this impairment is overcome by recruitment of other brain regions and/or by repeated training. This contribution in memory contrasts with the role of Pyk2 in synaptic potentiation which is unveiled only in HFS-induced LTP, in response to a non-physiological type of intense stimulation, but not in a more physiological protocol of induction (see above). This contrast illustrates the absence of simple one-to-one correspondence between specific forms of LTP in slices and memory alterations, in spite of the widely acknowledged role of synaptic plasticity in learning and memory (Gallistel and Balsam, 2014). It is also apparent that other changes such as intrinsic plasticity are likely to contribute to memory processes (Titley et al., 2017), in which the role of Pyk2 remains to be fully explored both at the level of ion channel modulation and through its possible contribution to transcriptional regulations.

Pyk2 in Brain Diseases

Epilepsy

Given the activation of Pyk2 following stimulation of glutamate receptors, neuronal depolarization, and increased intracellular free Ca2+, it is not surprising that its phosphorylation on Tyr402 and other residues is increased following electroconvulsive shock (Jeon et al., 2001), more strongly than that of FAK (Kang et al., 2004). Tyrosine phosphorylation of NMDAR and PSD-associated Pyk2 increases in the hour following pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus and decreases subsequently (Niimura et al., 2005). Accordingly, neuronal pPyk2-immunofluorescence was decreased as compared to control mice 6 h after kainic acid-induced seizures, but, interestingly, appeared in activated microglia at 72 h (Tian et al., 2000). These results indicate the existence of early and transient activation of Pyk2 in neurons following seizures and a delayed activation in microglia. Microglial cells are the brain-resident form of macrophages, a cell type in which Pyk2 is known to play an important role (Baruzzi et al., 2008; Lee et al., 2021). The importance of inflammation and microglia is increasingly acknowledged in epilepsy, in which it has been proposed that epileptic seizures and inflammatory mediators form a vicious positive feedback loop (Sanz and Garcia-Gimeno, 2020). Thus it will be interesting to explore whether activation of Pyk2 not only in neurons but also in microglia, is involved in the pathogenic consequences of seizures and whether its inhibition might be beneficial.

Ischemia

Another condition in which strong stimulation of glutamate receptors occurs is brain ischemia. Pyk2 is rapidly enriched in PSDs following global transient brain ischemia in the rat (Cheung et al., 2000), reminiscent of the clustering of Pyk2 at PSDs induced in vitro by glutamate or NMDA (Bartos et al., 2010). Following focal cerebral ischemia pPyk2 immunoreactivity increases in neurons within 1 h and 24–72 h later in microglia around the necrotic infarcted area (Tian et al., 2000). Ischemia/reperfusion increases tyrosine phosphorylation of NMDAR subunits GluN2a and GluN2b (Cheung et al., 2000). The increase in tyrosine phosphorylation of GluN2a, Pyk2, and Src is reduced by pretreatment with inhibitors of the L-type voltage-gated calcium channel (Liu et al., 2003). Tyrosine phosphorylation of Src and Pyk2, but not their translocation to PSDs, is decreased by a PKC inhibitor (Cheung et al., 2003). Moreover, chronic lithium is neuroprotective during ischemia and inhibits the phosphorylation of Pyk2 at Tyr402 and Src at Tyr416 (Ma et al., 2004). Knockdown of Pyk2 decreases GluN2a tyrosine phosphorylation (Liu et al., 2005), and knockdown of PSD-95 decreases Pyk2 phosphorylation and neuronal death (Hou et al., 2005). Interestingly, the role of Pyk2 in ischemia or hypoxia is not restricted to the brain and has also been investigated in several non-neuronal cell types including in cardiomyocytes (Dougherty et al., 2004; Hart et al., 2008; Yan et al., 2015; Bibli et al., 2017a,b; Zhang et al., 2018; Miller et al., 2019). Overall the evidence indicates that Pyk2 is activated in ischemia/reperfusion models in the brain and in other organs, due to Ca2+ influx and possibly to redox imbalance. In neurons, the triggering mechanisms include the activation of glutamate receptors and depolarization-induced Ca2+ influx, clustering of Pyk2 to PSDs, activation of Pyk2 and SFKs, and NMDAR phosphorylation, through a mechanism that is at least in part dependent on PKC. This in turn may contribute to excitotoxicity by enhancing NMDAR function and possibly contributing to other toxic effects as in non-neuronal cells. Thus, Pyk2 inhibition would appear as a good candidate for therapies aiming to protect the brain after ischemia.

Huntington’s Disease

Huntington’s disease (HD) is characterized by motor and behavioral symptoms as well as cognitive decline leading to death. HD is an autosomal dominant alteration caused by the expansion of a CAG repeat in the human huntingtin gene (HTT) resulting in an extended poly glutamine sequence in the N-terminal part of the huntingtin protein which alters its stability and function [review in Saudou and Humbert (2016)]. Wild-type huntingtin and Pyk2 interact with the same SH3 domain of PSD-95 (Sun et al., 2001; Seabold et al., 2003). Poly glutamine extension alters Htt binding to PSD-95 and increases tyrosine phosphorylation of GluN2B by SFKs possibly facilitating neurotoxicity (Sun et al., 2001; Song et al., 2003). Pyk2 levels are decreased in the hippocampus of patients with HD and in R6/1 mice (Giralt et al., 2017), which overexpress an N-terminal fragment of human Htt with expanded glutamine (Mangiarini et al., 1996). The decrease in Pyk2 expression is likely to result, at least in part, from transcriptional alterations since its mRNA is also diminished [(Runne et al., 2008) and al Massadi et al. in preparation]. R6/1 mice display synaptic alterations in the hippocampus reminiscent of those in Pyk2 KO mice (Giralt et al., 2017). Pyk2 overexpression in the hippocampus of these mice improved their memory deficits, spine pathology, and PSD-95 mislocalization, but not LTP alterations. It is thus likely that the Pyk2 deficit in the hippocampus contributes to some aspects of cognitive impairments in HD, which can potentially be improved by Pyk2 increased expression. Similar decreases in Pyk2 protein and mRNA levels are found in the putamen of HD patients and the striatum of R6/1 and R6/2 mouse models (al Massadi et al. in preparation). However, it is not known whether this deficit contributes to the phenotype. Interestingly, the levels of STEP, the phosphatase that inactivates Pyk2, are also decreased in patients and mouse models of the disease, and its phosphorylation on serine is increased, indicating inhibition of STEP activity (Saavedra et al., 2011). This was interpreted as a possible compensatory mechanism that could increase neuronal resistance to excitotoxicity. In support of this hypothesis, genetic deletion of STEP delayed the onset of motor dysfunction and prevented the appearance of cognitive deficits in R6/1 mice, and acute pharmacological inhibition of STEP with TC-2153 improved cognitive function in these mice (Garcia-Forn et al., 2018). Although STEP has other targets that can mediate these effects, including ERK, it is tempting to propose that decreasing the negative control exerted by STEP on Pyk2 and the associated SFKs contributes to the beneficial effects of STEP inhibitors and reinforces their therapeutic interest.

Alzheimer’s Disease

Several lines of evidence implicate Pyk2 at multiple levels in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and AD mouse models. The first line of evidence comes from human genetic studies. A large genome-wide association (GWAS) meta-analysis identified the PTK2B gene as a locus associated with late-onset AD (Lambert et al., 2013). This finding was replicated in several other studies (Beecham et al., 2014; Jiao et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2015; Nettiksimmons et al., 2016; Lawingco et al., 2021; Schwartzentruber et al., 2021). Moreover, in AD patients, PTK2B appears to be associated with hippocampal sclerosis (Beecham et al., 2014), disease progression (Wang et al., 2015), and cognitive decline (Nettiksimmons et al., 2016). Until now, no alteration in the coding sequence of PTK2B has been reported and the variants are more likely to be linked to modifications of expression. One single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), rs28834970C, associated with an increased risk of AD (Lambert et al., 2013) was found to be associated with increased PTK2B mRNA expression in monocytes of healthy subjects (Chan et al., 2015). Another SNP associated with increased risk of AD, rs2279590, is located in an enhancer near the PTK2B gene and the risk allele increases expression of several genes including PTK2B (Padhy et al., 2017). Moreover, a recent transcriptome study found an association between AD and increased PTK2B expression in monocytes (Harwood et al., 2021). Together these observations suggest that late onset AD risk is associated with increased expression of Pyk2 protein in monocytes, and probably in tissue-resident macrophages such as microglia, and possibly in other cell types. Interestingly, genes coding for proteins of the p130Cas/BCAR1 family that interact with Pyk2 and/or FAK (Deneka et al., 2015), including CASS4 (Lambert et al., 2013) and NEDD9 (Li et al., 2008) are also associated with an increased risk of late-onset AD, but it is not known whether this corresponds to their participation in the same pathophysiological mechanisms in the disease.

Alzheimer’s disease hallmarks include amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, and glial responses as well as “negative” lesions including neuronal and synaptic loss (Serrano-Pozo et al., 2011). Extracellular amyloid plaques are comprised of β-amyloid peptide Aβ1–42, the amyloidogenic and toxic fragment of the amyloid precursor protein APP, while neurofibrillary tangles are aggregates of hyperphosphorylated microtubule-binding protein Tau. Data from several laboratories indicate multiple levels at which Pyk2 could be involved in the course of the disease. The group of Strittmatter provided strong evidence that Pyk2 participates in a cascade triggered by oligomeric Aβ (Aβo), the major toxic form of Aβ [review in Brody and Strittmatter (2018); Figure 5A]. The cellular prion protein (PrPc), which is a receptor of Aβo, associates with mGluR5 and by its intermediate with Homer1b/c, Pyk2, and Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (Haas et al., 2016, 2017; Haas and Strittmatter, 2016). Aβo slightly increases Pyk2 phosphorylation while AZD0530, an inhibitor of Fyn, decreases Pyk2 and GluN2b tyrosine phosphorylation (Kaufman et al., 2015) as expected from the decreased Pyk2 phosphorylation observed in Fyn KO mice (Corvol et al., 2005). This inhibitor improves several histological and behavioral parameters in APPSwe/PSEN1ΔE9 mice [bearing 2 human mutations responsible for familial AD, APP KM670/671NL (Swedish) and presenilin-1 (PSEN1) ΔE9 (Jankowsky et al., 2004)]; Kaufman et al. (2015). Aβo disrupts glutamate’s ability to regulate Pyk2 and Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II signaling through mGluR5, whereas Pyk2 is activated by Fyn (Haas and Strittmatter, 2016). In APPSwe/PSEN1ΔE9 mice lacking Pyk2, the deleterious effects of Aβo on synaptic plasticity (TBS-induced LTP) and behavioral alterations are prevented (Salazar et al., 2019). Pyk2 KO also improves dendritic spine loss induced by Aβo and this effect may result from the alleviation of inhibition by Pyk2 of Graf1c, a RhoA GTPase-activating protein (Lee et al., 2019). This counterintuitive positive effect of deletion of Pyk2 on spine density reflects the ambivalent function of Pyk2 in spine formation and maintenance discussed above (section “Pyk2 in Neurite and Spine Formation and Maintenance”). It is likely that in APPSwe/PSEN1ΔE9 mice, the increased stability gained by deleting Pyk2 overcomes the possible negative effects linked to the absence of Pyk2. Overall, these results argue in favor of a deleterious role of Pyk2 following its release from mGluR5 complex and its phosphorylation by Fyn, due to Aβo interaction with PrPc (Brody and Strittmatter, 2018).

FIGURE 5

Pyk2 is also linked with tauopathy since Tau is a substrate of Fyn (Lee et al., 2004; Bhaskar et al., 2005, 2010) and Pyk2 (Li and Gotz, 2018). Pyk2 co-localizes with hyperphosphorylated Tau in the brain of AD patients and in the Tau transgenic pR5 mouse model (Kohler et al., 2013; Dourlen et al., 2017). Phosphorylation by Fyn, which can be activated by Pyk2 (Li and Gotz, 2018), promotes the somatodendritic accumulation of Tau, whereas this protein is normally located in axons (Li and Gotz, 2017). Pyk2 can also activate GSK3, which phosphorylates Tau [review in Hooper et al. (2008)]. Moreover, drosophila FAK, the single ortholog of FAK and Pyk2 in this species, is a modulator of Tau toxicity in a fly eye model of neurodegeneration (Dourlen et al., 2017). Taken together, these results suggest that Pyk2 could contribute to tauopathy by directly and indirectly modifying Tau phosphorylation at several sites, although it does not seem to be necessary for the prion-like spreading of pathological human Tau microinjected in mouse brain (Nies et al., 2021). Thus, Pyk2 is a good candidate for linking Aβ and tau pathology in the framework of the amyloid cascade hypothesis (Figure 5A).

Other evidence sheds a different light on the role of Pyk2 and suggests it may be more complex than anticipated based on its contribution to the pathogenic cascades (Figure 5B). It was first proposed that the scaffolding protein Ran-binding protein 9 (RanBP9), which is markedly increased in AD brains, promotes Aβ1–42 generation by scaffolding APP/BACE1/LRP complexes together and accelerating APP endocytosis through a mechanism that involves disruption of Pyk2/paxillin signaling (Woo et al., 2012). When 5XFAD mice, which express transgenic human APP and PSEN1 with several mutations [APPSwe, I716V (Florida), V717I (London) and PSEN1 M146L, L286V (Oakley et al., 2006)] were crossed with Pyk2 KO mice, their behavioral and histological phenotypes were not improved, except for a small decrease in plaque number (Giralt et al., 2018). In 5XFAD mice, Pyk2 Tyr402 phosphorylation levels in the hippocampus were reduced and overexpression of Pyk2 in this brain region rescued autophosphorylated Pyk2 levels and improved synaptic markers and performance in several behavioral tasks, despite a slight increase in plaque number (Giralt et al., 2018). The presence of a potentially toxic proteolytic fragment of Src was observed in 5XFAD and Pyk2 KO mice, which was corrected by Pyk2 viral expression (Giralt et al., 2018). In further support of the positive role of Pyk2, its overexpression in hippocampal neurons in a microfluidic culture system also protected these neurons from Aβ1–42 toxicity (Kilinc et al., 2020). These results suggest that in some conditions a functional deficit of Pyk2 could play a role in AD model. The possible positive effects of increasing Pyk2 expression/phosphorylation are in agreement with the effects of inhibition of STEP, its main phosphatase. Aβ enhances STEP activity, through a mechanism that involves α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and calcineurin (PP2B) activation leading to dephosphorylation and decreased surface expression of NMDAR (Snyder et al., 2005). Moreover, STEP levels are increased in an AD mouse model and in human cortical samples (Chin et al., 2005; Kurup et al., 2010). The phenotype of 3xTg AD mouse model carrying mutated forms of human APPSwe, Tau P301L, and PSEN1 M146V (Oddo et al., 2003) is improved when they are crossed with STEP KO mice (Zhang et al., 2010). Behavioral improvement is also observed following treatment with a pharmacological inhibitor of STEP and is accompanied by increased phosphorylation of Pyk2 (Xu et al., 2014). Genetic reduction or pharmacological inhibition of STEP also increases synaptic connectivity in cell cultures and the triple transgenic AD mouse models (Chatterjee et al., 2021). These various lines of evidence suggest that increased STEP activity and diminished tyrosine phosphorylation pathways, including those mediated by Pyk2, could have a negative effect in the context of AD.

An additional level of complexity comes from the role of Pyk2 in microglial cells that are an important player in AD (Saez-Atienzar and Masliah, 2020). In a culture system, Pyk2 is involved, downstream of PKC, in the secretion of neurotoxic factors by microglia stimulated by Aβ (Combs et al., 1999). TRPM2 is a ROS-sensitive calcium channel expressed in neurons, astrocytes, and microglia, which has been implicated in many neurological diseases (Belrose and Jackson, 2018). In monocytes (the circulating form of macrophages), TRPM2 activates a Pyk2/ERK pathway leading to the generation of chemokines and exacerbating inflammation (Yamamoto et al., 2008). This signaling pathway is involved in microglial activation by Aβ1–42 and the subsequent generation of cytotoxic tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα), with Pyk2 playing a positive feedback role on the TRPM2 channel (Alawieyah Syed Mortadza et al., 2018). As described above data in human subjects suggest that PTK2B variants associated with increased risk of AD lead to a higher expression of Pyk2 in monocytes and possibly in tissue-resident macrophages (Chan et al., 2015; Harwood et al., 2021). Although the existence of an increased Pyk2 expression in microglia has not been tested, it is tempting to speculate that it could contribute to the microglial/neuroinflammation arm of AD pathology. Under this hypothesis Pyk2 in microglia could be an interesting therapeutic target.

In conclusion, Pyk2 is in a position to play multiple roles in AD mouse models and possibly in late-onset AD in human patients. In neurons, Pyk2 in interaction with Fyn is a mediator of Aβ toxicity and can link Aβ effects with Tau aberrant phosphorylation, making it a potential key player in the amyloid cascade. On the other hand, a functional deficit in Pyk2, possibly related to an enhanced STEP activity, may contribute to some aspects of the functional deficits in mouse models of AD. It remains to be established which of these two opposing mechanisms are predominant depending on the experimental model and conditions and whether they play a role in human patients. Finally, the possible contribution of Pyk2 in microglia to the pathogenic mechanism of AD needs to be further investigated. It is tempting to suggest that depending on the genetic variants of PTK2B, slight changes in its expression regulation may favor one arm or the other of these multiple aspects of Pyk2 role. These questions have practical importance for future therapeutic developments since selective inhibitors of Pyk2 are being developed and could constitute useful therapeutic tools, as well as, but in the opposite direction, inhibitors of STEP, which indirectly increase Pyk2 function.

Parkinson’s Disease

The protein which is the main component of Lewy bodies and plays a key role in the neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s disease, α-synuclein, is phosphorylated by SFKs, including Fyn, on several residues, mostly Tyr125 (Ellis et al., 2001; Nakamura T. et al., 2001). This phosphorylation is increased in response to hyperosmotic shock through activation of Pyk2 (Nakamura et al., 2002) and inhibited by a Pyk2/RAFTK-associated protein (PRAP) that binds to Pyk2 PR3 motif through its SH3 domain (Takahashi et al., 2003). Phosphorylation of α-synuclein at Tyr125 is a priming event for phosphorylation of Ser129 by protein kinase CK1, a site predominantly phosphorylated in Lewy bodies (Kosten et al., 2014). However, Tyr125 phosphorylation has been proposed to have a neuroprotective role in a drosophila model of synucleinopathy (Chen et al., 2009b). This protective effect may result from the prevention by Tyr125 phosphorylation of the sequestration in Lewy bodies by α-synuclein of phosphoinositide-3 kinase enhancer L (PIKE-L), a GTPase abundantly found in nerve termini, which has neuroprotective effects (Kang et al., 2017). No alteration of Pyk2 has been reported in Parkinson’s disease but STEP levels were shown to be elevated in brains from patients with Parkinson’s disease and STEP61, the membrane-associated isoform of STEP, is upregulated in Parkinson’s disease (Kurup et al., 2015). These results could suggest impaired tyrosine phosphorylation in Parkinson’s disease due to increased STEP. However, the role of Fyn in Parkinson’s disease is generally thought to be negative, and potential therapeutic interest of its inhibitors has been proposed [see (Angelopoulou et al., 2020) for a recent review].

Psychiatric Disorders and Drug Addiction

A few studies associated Pyk2 with chronic stress damage and depressive disorders. In the lateral septum, Pyk2 phosphorylation decreases following stress exposure, and enhancing Pyk2 expression prevents the active avoidance deficit caused by exposure to inescapable shock, suggesting an antidepressant role (Sheehan et al., 2003). In the rat prefrontal cortex, imipramine, an antidepressant drug that blocks the reuptake of monoamine neurotransmitters, activates a pathway involving Pyk2 activation and ERK phosphorylation (Zalewska et al., 2016). In major depression in humans and in a mouse chronic stress model, a decrease in the nuclear pore protein NUP62 transcript was reported (Kinoshita et al., 2014). NUP62 is phosphorylated by Pyk2, facilitating its dissociation from the nuclear pore, and pTyr402-Pyk2 accumulates in the perinuclear space of CA3 hippocampal neurons following chronic stress in the rat (Kinoshita et al., 2014). Therefore the authors proposed that Pyk2 activation and the subsequently decreased function of NUP62 participate in the phenotype possibly by altering the dendritic arbor complexity. Pyk2 has also been implicated in a mouse model of depressive state induced by chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) (Montalban et al., 2019). In Pyk2 KO mice, anxiety and anhedonia induced by CUMS were less pronounced than in wild-type littermates whereas another phenotype (struggling in the forced swimming test) was not altered. This improvement of behavioral consequences of CUMS observed in constitutive KO mice was mimicked by a bilateral targeted deletion of Pyk2 in the amygdala (Montalban et al., 2019). A possible explanation of the beneficial effect of Pyk2 deletion in this model is that it specifically prevents the stress-induced synaptic plasticity in the amygdala, which leads to the depressive-like phenotype.

Another common brain disorder extensively studied in animals is addiction. Chronic exposure to cocaine was shown to increase Pyk2 levels in primate nucleus accumbens (Freeman et al., 2001) and rat frontal cortex (Freeman et al., 2002) leading to the idea of a possible implication of Pyk2 in addiction. A neuroprotective role of Pyk2 has been described in rats receiving moderate ethanol preconditioning (Mitchell et al., 2016). This preconditioning induces neuroprotection against oxidative stress possibly involving a Pyk2/NMDAR pathway leading to the elevation of an antioxidant protein, peroxiredoxin 2 (Prx2). The acute locomotor effects of cocaine injection are decreased in Pyk2 KO mice as compared to wild-type (de Pins et al., 2020). Targeted deletions suggest that this effect results from the absence of Pyk2 in the dopamine D1 receptors-expressing neurons of the nucleus accumbens. In contrast, behavioral alterations that result from cocaine effects on neuronal plasticity, locomotor sensitization, and conditioned place preference were normal in Pyk2 mutant mice (de Pins et al., 2020). A recent study in mice showed that cocaine self-administration triggers a loss of dendritic spines on orbitofrontal cortex excitatory neurons (Whyte et al., 2021). The authors provide evidence that β1-integrin plays a key role in stabilizing spines and that the behavioral effects of cocaine are counterbalanced by Pyk2 overexpression. These results suggest that Pyk2 participates in spines stabilization downstream of β1-integrin regulating drug self-administration and possibly other effects. Thus the few studies on the role of Pyk2 in depression and addiction models suggest that it may play a role by supporting plasticity in specific brain regions, with either negative behavioral consequences when it involves amygdala in stress-induced depression, or positive ones when it takes place in orbitofrontal cortex in addiction.

Pyk2 in Astrocytes and Glioma

Astrocytes have critical importance in the nervous tissue and are directly involved in synaptic function. Pyk2 is expressed in astrocytes where it can be activated by endothelin-1 (Cazaubon et al., 1997), stromal cell-derived factor-1, also known as SDF-1 (Bajetto et al., 2001), thrombin (Wang and Reiser, 2003), and angiotensin II (Clark and Gonzalez, 2007), and is upstream of the ERK pathway. In many cell types, FAK and Pyk2 play a role in cell migration, by facilitating cytoskeleton remodeling and cell adhesion dynamics [see (Schaller, 2010) for a review]. In particular, Pyk2 regulates actin dynamics in non-neuronal cells such as macrophages, fibroblasts, and osteoclasts (Okigaki et al., 2003; Lim et al., 2008b; Li et al., 2017). Pyk2 involvement in astrocytes migration is supported by the slower migration of Pyk2 KO astrocytes as compared to wild-type astrocytes after physical lesion and their impaired actin re-polymerization after treatment with the actin-depolymerizing drug latrunculin B (Giralt et al., 2016). This effect possibly involves Pyk2 interaction in astrocytes lamellipodia with gelsolin, an actin-binding, severing, and capping protein (Giralt et al., 2016) as shown in osteoclasts (Wang et al., 2003). Pyk2 may also play a role in anti-oxidant responses of astrocytes as indicated by its involvement in the arachidonic acid-induced increase in heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) (Lin et al., 2018).

Beyond these roles in normal astrocytes, Pyk2 implication in astroglial tumors has attracted a lot of attention and the detailed description of the results is beyond the scope of this review. Pyk2 has been implicated in various cancer types in which it constitutes an interesting therapeutic target [review in Zhu et al. (2018)]. Protein levels of Pyk2 are increased in invasive glioblastoma cells (Hoelzinger et al., 2005) and expression levels are associated with the migration capacity of human glioblastoma cells whereas FAK activity is linked to proliferation (Lipinski et al., 2003). siRNA knockdown of Pyk2 further confirmed the central role of Pyk2 in the migration of glioblastoma cells (Lipinski et al., 2005; Rolon-Reyes et al., 2015). The interaction between Pyk2 and MAP4K4 (mitogen-activated protein kinase-kinase-kinase-kinase 4) was shown to be decisive in this function (Loftus et al., 2013). Interestingly, melatonin could be a potential therapeutic molecule able to reduce Pyk2 activation and, thus, inhibit tumor cell migration/invasion (Xu et al., 2015). In neuroblastoma, Pyk2 may also play an important role as it was shown that TRPM2 expression increases the viability of neuroblastoma through a pathway involving Pyk2 activation (Hirschler-Laszkiewicz et al., 2018). Taken together, these results indicate that Pyk2 could be a potential target for glioma and neuroblastoma therapies.

Pyk2 Inhibitors

Pyk2 like FAK has been implicated in various cancers in which it contributes to increase cell viability or migration by activating various oncogenic pathways and the expression level of these two proteins is often associated with poor prognosis [reviews in Sulzmaier et al. (2014); Zhu et al. (2018)]. Therefore much effort has been devoted to the identification of small molecules capable to inhibit these kinases and several compounds are undergoing clinical trials in cancer. The inhibitors usually target the ATP binding site and because of the high degree of structural conservation between FAK and Pyk2, most bind to and inhibit the two kinases. However, several compounds have been reported to display a certain degree of selectivity for Pyk2 including PF-4618433 (Han et al., 2009) and PF-719 (Tse et al., 2012). However, given the diversity and importance of FAK functions, this low selectivity is likely to hamper the clinical exploration of such inhibitors in conditions other than cancers with poor prognosis. The design of compounds targeting other regions of Pyk2 or FAK could lead to more specific inhibitors or molecules interfering only with specific properties of these multifunctional proteins with multiple partners (Walkiewicz et al., 2015). This is an open area for research, which could also lead to compounds enhancing some functions of Pyk2. In this respect, the only current way to pharmacologically enhance Pyk2 function, albeit non-specifically, is to inhibit the phosphatases responsible for its dephosphorylation, especially STEP in brain neurons (Xu et al., 2014; Chatterjee et al., 2021). When specific compounds are identified and the role of Pyk2 in the various neurological or psychiatric diseases discussed above is better understood, the exploration of their therapeutic applications will be of great interest.

Conclusion

Pyk2 is highly expressed and has important cellular and physiological functions in the central nervous system. Its presence is not necessary for the basic functioning of the brain that is grossly normal in Pyk2 KO mice, which grow and breed normally in animal facility conditions. In addition and in contrast to FAK, Pyk2 levels in the rodent brain increase dramatically in the post-natal period pointing to a more specific role in the late development or in adult brain than during early development. Convergent evidence shows that Pyk2 is involved in specific aspects of synaptic functions and plasticity. However Pyk2 signaling intervenes in multiple pathways, and has therefore multiple functions with in some cases opposing effects. Thus, depending on models and experimental conditions it can facilitate or inhibit neurite and dendritic spine formation. Pyk2 is also a component of the complex signaling machinery that regulates NMDAR in the post-synaptic region. As such it appears necessary for LTD and specific types of LTP, as well as for single-trial spatial memory. Multiple lines of evidence also point to the role of Pyk2 in pathological conditions. This role appears to be multifaceted with sometimes apparently opposite contributions to the pathology in mouse models. Pyk2 activation may contribute to the neurotoxic consequences of epilepsy and ischemia. Pyk2 levels or activity may be deficient in some neurodegenerative conditions such as in HD or AD, where this deficit can contribute to alterations in synaptic functions and behavior that are improved by expression of Pyk2 or inhibition of the major Pyk2 phosphatase STEP. In contrast, Pyk2 appears to be a key component in the cascade of events triggered by Aβ in models of Alzheimer’s disease where it may provide a link between amyloid toxicity and tauopathy. In addition, Pyk2’s enrichment in cells of the macrophage lineage including in activated microglia raises the possibility of its contribution to the neuroinflammatory component of various conditions including epilepsy, ischemia, and neurodegenerative diseases. In cancer in general and in glioblastoma in particular Pyk2 contributes to tumor cells’ malignancy, particularly by facilitating their mobility, indicating the potential therapeutic benefit of Pyk2 inhibitors in combination with other drugs. Since in neurological and psychiatric conditions the role of Pyk2 may include positive as well as deleterious aspects, it is important to precisely evaluate its contribution, including ultimately in humans, to balance the potential benefit of its pharmacological inhibition or its possible enhancement, including through the manipulation of tyrosine phosphatases such as STEP.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Statements

Author contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

Funding

Work in the J-AG’s lab was supported by Inserm, Sorbonne Université, and grants from Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-19-CE16-0020), FRM (EQU201903007844), and Inserm-Transfert COPOC. BP was supported by the FRM, FDT201805005390.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  • 1

    AbelT.NguyenP. V.BaradM.DeuelT. A.KandelE. R.BourtchouladzeR. (1997). Genetic demonstration of a role for PKA in the late phase of LTP and in hippocampus-based long-term memory.Cell88615626. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81904-2

  • 2

    AfonsoP.De LucaP.CarvalhoR. S.CortesL.PinheiroP.OliveirosB.et al (2019). BDNF increases synaptic NMDA receptor abundance by enhancing the local translation of Pyk2 in cultured hippocampal neurons.Sci. Signal.12:eaav3577. 10.1126/scisignal.aav3577

  • 3

    AggletonJ. P.NelsonA. J. D. (2020). Distributed interactive brain circuits for object-in-place memory: a place for time?Brain Neurosci. Adv.4:2398212820933471. 10.1177/2398212820933471

  • 4

    AhmadianG.JuW.LiuL.WyszynskiM.LeeS. H.DunahA. W.et al (2004). Tyrosine phosphorylation of GluR2 is required for insulin-stimulated AMPA receptor endocytosis and LTD.EMBO J.2310401050. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600126

  • 5

    Alawieyah Syed, MortadzaS.SimJ. A.NeubrandV. E.JiangL. H. (2018). A critical role of TRPM2 channel in Abeta42 -induced microglial activation and generation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha.Glia66562575. 10.1002/glia.23265

  • 6

    AlierK. A.MorrisB. J. (2005). Divergent regulation of Pyk2/CAKbeta phosphorylation by Ca2+ and cAMP in the hippocampus.Biochim. Biophys. Acta1745342349. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2005.04.003

  • 7

    AndreevJ.SimonJ. P.SabatiniD. D.KamJ.PlowmanG.RandazzoP. A.et al (1999). Identification of a new Pyk2 target protein with Arf-GAP activity.Mol. Cell. Biol.1923382350. 10.1128/MCB.19.3.2338

  • 8

    AnfossoF.BardinN.VivierE.SabatierF.SampolJ.Dignat-GeorgeF. (2001). Outside-in signaling pathway linked to CD146 engagement in human endothelial cells.J. Biol. Chem.27615641569.

  • 9

    AngelopoulouE.PaudelY. N.JulianT.ShaikhM. F.PiperiC. (2020). Pivotal role of fyn kinase in Parkinson’s disease and levodopa-induced dyskinesia: a novel therapeutic target?Mol. Neurobiol.5813721391. 10.1007/s12035-020-02201-z

  • 10

    AotoH.SasakiH.IshinoM.SasakiT. (2002). Nuclear translocation of cell adhesion kinase beta/proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2.Cell Struct. Funct.274761.

  • 11

    ArthurJ. F.ShenY.GardinerE. E.ColemanL.MurphyD.KennyD.et al (2011). TNF receptor-associated factor 4 (TRAF4) is a novel binding partner of glycoprotein Ib and glycoprotein VI in human platelets.J. Thromb. Haemost.9163172. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.04091.x

  • 12

    AstierA.AvrahamH.ManieS. N.GroopmanJ.CantyT.AvrahamS.et al (1997). The related adhesion focal tyrosine kinase is tyrosine-phosphorylated after beta1-integrin stimulation in B cells and binds to p130cas.J. Biol. Chem.272228232. 10.1074/jbc.272.1.228

  • 13

    AvrahamS.LondonR.FuY.OtaS.HiregowdaraD.LiJ.et al (1995). Identification and characterization of a novel related adhesion focal tyrosine kinase (RAFTK) from megakaryocytes and brain.J. Biol. Chem.2702774227751. 10.1074/jbc.270.46.27742

  • 14

    BajettoA.BarberoS.BonaviaR.PiccioliP.PiraniP.FlorioT.et al (2001). Stromal cell-derived factor-1alpha induces astrocyte proliferation through the activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 pathway.J. Neurochem.7712261236.

  • 15

    BartosJ. A.UlrichJ. D.LiH.BeazelyM. A.ChenY.MacdonaldJ. F.et al (2010). Postsynaptic clustering and activation of Pyk2 by PSD-95.J. Neurosci.30449463.

  • 16

    BaruzziA.CaveggionE.BertonG. (2008). Regulation of phagocyte migration and recruitment by Src-family kinases.Cell Mol. Life. Sci.6521752190.

  • 17

    BeechamG. W.HamiltonK.NajA. C.MartinE. R.HuentelmanM.MyersA. J.et al (2014). Genome-wide association meta-analysis of neuropathologic features of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias.PLoS Genet.10:e1004606. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004606

  • 18

    BelroseJ. C.JacksonM. F. (2018). TRPM2: a candidate therapeutic target for treating neurological diseases.Acta Pharmacol. Sin.39722732.

  • 19

    BenbernouN.MueggeK.DurumS. K. (2000). Interleukin (IL)-7 induces rapid activation of Pyk2, which is bound to Janus kinase 1 and IL-7Ralpha.J. Biol. Chem.27570607065. 10.1074/jbc.275.10.7060

  • 20

    BenzingT.GerkeP.HopkerK.HildebrandtF.KimE.WalzG. (2001). Nephrocystin interacts with Pyk2, p130(Cas), and tensin and triggers phosphorylation of Pyk2.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A.9897849789. 10.1073/pnas.171269898

  • 21

    BhaskarK.HobbsG. A.YenS. H.LeeG. (2010). Tyrosine phosphorylation of tau accompanies disease progression in transgenic mouse models of tauopathy.Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol.36462477. 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2010.01103.x

  • 22

    BhaskarK.YenS. H.LeeG. (2005). Disease-related modifications in tau affect the interaction between Fyn and Tau.J. Biol. Chem.2803511935125. 10.1074/jbc.M505895200

  • 23

    BibliS. I.SzaboC.ChatzianastasiouA.LuckB.ZukunftS.FlemingI.et al (2017a). Hydrogen sulfide preserves endothelial nitric oxide synthase function by inhibiting proline-rich kinase 2: implications for cardiomyocyte survival and cardioprotection.Mol. Pharmacol.92718730. 10.1124/mol.117.109645

  • 24

    BibliS. I.ZhouZ.ZukunftS.FisslthalerB.AndreadouI.SzaboC.et al (2017b). Tyrosine phosphorylation of eNOS regulates myocardial survival after an ischaemic insult: role of PYK2.Cardiovasc. Res.113926937. 10.1093/cvr/cvx058

  • 25

    BlaukatA.Ivankovic-DikicI.GronroosE.DolfiF.TokiwaG.VuoriK.et al (1999). Adaptor proteins Grb2 and Crk couple Pyk2 with activation of specific mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades.J. Biol. Chem.2741489314901. 10.1074/jbc.274.21.14893

  • 26

    Bongiorno-BorboneL.KadareG.BenfenatiF.GiraultJ. A. (2005). FAK and PYK2 interact with SAP90/PSD-95-Associated Protein-3.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.337641646. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.09.099

  • 27

    BourginC.MuraiK. K.RichterM.PasqualeE. B. (2007). The EphA4 receptor regulates dendritic spine remodeling by affecting beta1-integrin signaling pathways.J. Cell Biol.17812951307. 10.1083/jcb.200610139

  • 28

    Brami-CherrierK.GervasiN.ArsenievaD.WalkiewiczK.BoutterinM. C.OrtegaA.et al (2014). FAK dimerization controls its kinase-dependent functions at focal adhesions.EMBO J.33356370. 10.1002/embj.201386399

  • 29

    BrodyA. H.StrittmatterS. M. (2018). Synaptotoxic signaling by amyloid beta oligomers in Alzheimer’s disease through prion protein and mGluR5.Adv. Pharmacol.82293323. 10.1016/bs.apha.2017.09.007

  • 30

    BruzzanitiA.NeffL.SandovalA.DuL.HorneW. C.BaronR. (2009). Dynamin reduces Pyk2 Y402 phosphorylation and SRC binding in osteoclasts.Mol. Cell. Biol.2936443656. 10.1128/MCB.00851-08

  • 31

    ByronK. L.LucchesiP. A. (2002). Signal transduction of physiological concentrations of vasopressin in A7r5 vascular smooth muscle cells. A role for PYK2 and tyrosine phosphorylation of K+ channels in the stimulation of Ca2+ spiking.J. Biol. Chem.27772987307. 10.1074/jbc.M104726200

  • 32

    CaoZ.GeorgeJ.BadenD. G.MurrayT. F. (2007). Brevetoxin-induced phosphorylation of Pyk2 and Src in murine neocortical neurons involves distinct signaling pathways.Brain Res.11841727. 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.09.065

  • 33

    CazaubonS.ChaverotN.RomeroI. A.GiraultJ. A.AdamsonP.StrosbergA. D.et al (1997). Growth factor activity of endothelin-1 in primary astrocytes mediated by adhesion-dependent and -independent pathways.J. Neurosci.1762036212. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-16-06203.1997

  • 34

    ChanG.WhiteC. C.WinnP. A.CimpeanM.ReplogleJ. M.GlickL. R.et al (2015). CD33 modulates TREM2: convergence of Alzheimer loci.Nat. Neurosci.1815561558. 10.1038/nn.4126

  • 35

    ChatterjeeM.KwonJ.BenedictJ.KamcevaM.KurupP.LombrosoP. J. (2021). STEP inhibition prevents Abeta-mediated damage in dendritic complexity and spine density in Alzheimer’s disease.Exp. Brain Res.239881890. 10.1007/s00221-020-06028-x

  • 36

    ChauhanD.PandeyP.HideshimaT.TreonS.RajeN.DaviesF. E.et al (2000). SHP2 mediates the protective effect of interleukin-6 against dexamethasone-induced apoptosis in multiple myeloma cells.J. Biol. Chem.2752784527850. 10.1074/jbc.M003428200

  • 37

    ChenJ.LuY.MengS.HanM. H.LinC.WangX. (2009a). alpha- and gamma-Protocadherins negatively regulate PYK2.J. Biol. Chem.28428802890. 10.1074/jbc.M807417200

  • 38

    ChenL.PeriquetM.WangX.NegroA.McleanP. J.HymanB. T.et al (2009b). Tyrosine and serine phosphorylation of alpha-synuclein have opposing effects on neurotoxicity and soluble oligomer formation.J. Clin. Invest.11932573265. 10.1172/JCI39088

  • 39

    ChenY.ChenA. Q.LuoX. Q.GuoL. X.TangY.BaoC. J.et al (2014). Hippocampal NR2B-containing NMDA receptors enhance long-term potentiation in rats with chronic visceral pain.Brain Res.15704353. 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.05.001

  • 40

    CheungH. H.TakagiN.TevesL.LoganR.WallaceM. C.GurdJ. W. (2000). Altered association of protein tyrosine kinases with postsynaptic densities after transient cerebral ischemia in the rat brain.J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.20505512. 10.1097/00004647-200003000-00009

  • 41

    CheungH. H.TevesL.WallaceM. C.GurdJ. W. (2003). Inhibition of protein kinase C reduces ischemia-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor.J. Neurochem.8614411449. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.01951.x

  • 42

    ChinJ.PalopJ. J.PuolivaliJ.MassaroC.Bien-LyN.GersteinH.et al (2005). Fyn kinase induces synaptic and cognitive impairments in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease.J. Neurosci.2596949703. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2980-05.2005

  • 43

    ChishtiA. H.KimA. C.MarfatiaS. M.LutchmanM.HanspalM.JindalH.et al (1998). The FERM domain: a unique module involved in the linkage of cytoplasmic proteins to the membrane.Trends Biochem. Sci.23281282. 10.1016/s0968-0004(98)01237-7

  • 44

    ChowA.DavisA. J.GawlerD. J. (2000). Identification of a novel protein complex containing annexin VI, Fyn, Pyk2, and the p120(GAP) C2 domain.FEBS Lett.4698892. 10.1016/s0014-5793(00)01252-7

  • 45

    ClarkM. A.GonzalezN. (2007). Src and Pyk2 mediate angiotensin II effects in cultured rat astrocytes.Regul. Pept.1434755.

  • 46

    CombsC. K.JohnsonD. E.CannadyS. B.LehmanT. M.LandrethG. E. (1999). Identification of microglial signal transduction pathways mediating a neurotoxic response to amyloidogenic fragments of beta-amyloid and prion proteins.J. Neurosci.19928939. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-03-00928.1999

  • 47

    CorvolJ. C.ValjentE.ToutantM.EnslenH.IrinopoulouT.LevS.et al (2005). Depolarization activates ERK and proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 (PYK2) independently in different cellular compartments in hippocampal slices.J. Biol. Chem.280660668. 10.1074/jbc.M411312200

  • 48

    CunninghamJ. I.RaudenskyJ.TonkissJ.YamamotoB. K. (2009). MDMA pretreatment leads to mild chronic unpredictable stress-induced impairments in spatial learning.Behav. Neurosci.12310761084. 10.1037/a0016716

  • 49

    DasP.PalS.OldfieldC. M.ThillaiK.BalaS.CarnevaleK. A.et al (2021). A PKCbeta-LYN-PYK2 signaling axis is critical for mcp-1-dependent migration and adhesion of monocytes.J. Immunol.206181192. 10.4049/jimmunol.1900706

  • 50

    DavidsonD.VeilletteA. (2001). PTP-PEST, a scaffold protein tyrosine phosphatase, negatively regulates lymphocyte activation by targeting a unique set of substrates.EMBO J.2034143426. 10.1093/emboj/20.13.3414

  • 51

    de PinsB.MontalbanE.VanhoutteP.GiraltA.GiraultJ. A. (2020). The non-receptor tyrosine kinase Pyk2 modulates acute locomotor effects of cocaine in D1 receptor-expressing neurons of the nucleus accumbens.Sci. Rep.10:6619. 10.1038/s41598-020-63426-5

  • 52

    DenekaA.KorobeynikovV.GolemisE. A. (2015). Embryonal Fyn-associated substrate (EFS) and CASS4: the lesser-known CAS protein family members.Gene5702535. 10.1016/j.gene.2015.06.062

  • 53

    DereE.HustonJ. P.De Souza SilvaM. A. (2007). The pharmacology, neuroanatomy and neurogenetics of one-trial object recognition in rodents.Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.31673704. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.01.005

  • 54

    DerkinderenP.SicilianoJ.ToutantM.GiraultJ. A. (1998). Differential regulation of FAK+ and PYK2/Cakbeta, two related tyrosine kinases, in rat hippocampal slices: effects of LPA, carbachol, depolarization and hyperosmolarity.Eur. J. Neurosci.1016671675. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1998.00174.x

  • 55

    DikicI.DikicI.SchlessingerJ. (1998). Identification of a new Pyk2 isoform implicated in chemokine and antigen receptor signaling.J. Biol. Chem.2731430114308. 10.1074/jbc.273.23.14301

  • 56

    DikicI.TokiwaG.LevS.CourtneidgeS. A.SchlessingerJ. (1996). A role for Pyk2 and Src in linking G-protein-coupled receptors with MAP kinase activation.Nature383547550. 10.1038/383547a0

  • 57

    DoughertyC. J.KubasiakL. A.FrazierD. P.LiH.XiongW. C.BishopricN. H.et al (2004). Mitochondrial signals initiate the activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) by hypoxia-reoxygenation.FASEB J.1810601070. 10.1096/fj.04-1505com

  • 58

    DourlenP.Fernandez-GomezF. J.DupontC.Grenier-BoleyB.BellenguezC.ObriotH.et al (2017). Functional screening of Alzheimer risk loci identifies PTK2B as an in vivo modulator and early marker of Tau pathology.Mol. Psychiatry22874883. 10.1038/mp.2016.59

  • 59

    DuongL. T.LakkakorpiP. T.NakamuraI.MachwateM.NagyR. M.RodanG. A. (1998). PYK2 in osteoclasts is an adhesion kinase, localized in the sealing zone, activated by ligation of alpha(v)beta3 integrin, and phosphorylated by src kinase.J. Clin. Invest.102881892. 10.1172/JCI3212

  • 60

    ElenisteP. P.BruzzanitiA. (2012). Focal adhesion kinases in adhesion structures and disease.J. Signal Transduct.2012:296450.

  • 61

    EllisC. E.SchwartzbergP. L.GriderT. L.FinkD. W.NussbaumR. L. (2001). alpha-synuclein is phosphorylated by members of the Src family of protein-tyrosine kinases.J. Biol. Chem.27638793884. 10.1074/jbc.M010316200

  • 62

    EvangelistaV.PamuklarZ.PiccoliA.ManariniS.Dell’elbaG.PecceR.et al (2007). Src family kinases mediate neutrophil adhesion to adherent platelets.Blood10924612469.

  • 63

    FaccioR.NovackD. V.ZalloneA.RossF. P.TeitelbaumS. L. (2003). Dynamic changes in the osteoclast cytoskeleton in response to growth factors and cell attachment are controlled by beta3 integrin.J. Cell Biol.162499509. 10.1083/jcb.200212082

  • 64

    FanL.LuY.ShenX.ShaoH.SuoL.WuQ. (2018). Alpha protocadherins and Pyk2 kinase regulate cortical neuron migration and cytoskeletal dynamics via Rac1 GTPase and WAVE complex in mice.eLife7:e35242. 10.7554/eLife.35242

  • 65

    FanY.QuX.MaY.QuJ.LiuY.HuX. (2014). Cbl-b accelerates trypsin-induced cell detachment through ubiquitination and degradation of proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2.Tumour Biol.351112911135. 10.1007/s13277-014-2296-z

  • 66

    FarshoriP. Q.ShahB. H.AroraK. K.Martinez-FuentesA.CattK. J. (2003). Activation and nuclear translocation of PKCdelta, Pyk2 and ERK1/2 by gonadotropin releasing hormone in HEK293 cells.J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.85337347. 10.1016/s0960-0760(03)00226-7

  • 67

    FaureC.CorvolJ. C.ToutantM.ValjentE.HvalbyO.JensenV.et al (2007). Calcineurin is essential for depolarization-induced nuclear translocation and tyrosine phosphorylation of PYK2 in neurons.J. Cell Sci.12030343044.

  • 68

    FaureC.RamosM.GiraultJ. A. (2013). Pyk2 cytonuclear localization: mechanisms and regulation by serine dephosphorylation.Cell. Mol. Life Sci.70137152. 10.1007/s00018-012-1075-5

  • 69

    FelschJ. S.CacheroT. G.PeraltaE. G. (1998). Activation of protein tyrosine kinase PYK2 by the m1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A.9550515056.

  • 70

    FelschJ. S.LaneW. S.PeraltaE. G. (1999). Tyrosine kinase Pyk2 mediates G-protein-coupled receptor regulation of the Ewing sarcoma RNA-binding protein EWS.Curr. Biol.9485488. 10.1016/s0960-9822(99)80214-0

  • 71

    FitzpatrickC. J.LombrosoP. J. (2011). The role of striatal-enriched protein tyrosine phosphatase (STEP) in cognition.Front. Neuroanat.5:47. 10.3389/fnana.2011.00047

  • 72

    FoxC. J.RussellK.TitternessA. K.WangY. T.ChristieB. R. (2007). Tyrosine phosphorylation of the GluR2 subunit is required for long-term depression of synaptic efficacy in young animals in vivo.Hippocampus17600605. 10.1002/hipo.20302

  • 73

    FrankG. D.SaitoS.MotleyE. D.SasakiT.OhbaM.KurokiT.et al (2002). Requirement of Ca(2+) and PKCdelta for Janus kinase 2 activation by angiotensin II: involvement of PYK2.Mol. Endocrinol.16367377. 10.1210/mend.16.2.0768

  • 74

    FreemanW. M.BrebnerK.LynchW. J.PatelK. M.RobertsonD. J.RobertsD. C.et al (2002). Changes in rat frontal cortex gene expression following chronic cocaine.Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res.1041120.

  • 75

    FreemanW. M.NaderM. A.NaderS. H.RobertsonD. J.GioiaL.MitchellS. M.et al (2001). Chronic cocaine-mediated changes in non-human primate nucleus accumbens gene expression.J. Neurochem.77542549. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00252.x

  • 76

    GallistelC. R.BalsamP. D. (2014). Time to rethink the neural mechanisms of learning and memory.Neurobiol. Learn. Mem.108136144.

  • 77

    GanjuR. K.BrubakerS. A.ChernockR. D.AvrahamS.GroopmanJ. E. (2000). Beta-chemokine receptor CCR5 signals through SHP1. SHP2, and Syk.J. Biol. Chem.2751726317268. 10.1074/jbc.M000689200

  • 78

    GanjuR. K.HatchW. C.AvrahamH.OnaM. A.DrukerB.AvrahamS.et al (1997). RAFTK, a novel member of the focal adhesion kinase family, is phosphorylated and associates with signaling molecules upon activation of mature T lymphocytes.J. Exp. Med.18510551063. 10.1084/jem.185.6.1055

  • 79

    Garcia-FornM.Martinez-TorresS.Garcia-Diaz BarrigaG.AlberchJ.MilaM.AzkonaG.et al (2018). Pharmacogenetic modulation of STEP improves motor and cognitive function in a mouse model of Huntington’s disease.Neurobiol. Dis.1208897. 10.1016/j.nbd.2018.08.024

  • 80

    GennaA.Gil-HennH. (2018). FAK family kinases: the Yin and Yang of cancer cell invasiveness.Mol. Cell Oncol.5:e1449584. 10.1080/23723556.2018.1449584

  • 81

    GinnanR.SingerH. A. (2002). CaM kinase II-dependent activation of tyrosine kinases and ERK1/2 in vascular smooth muscle.Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.282C754C761. 10.1152/ajpcell.00335.2001

  • 82

    GiraltA.BritoV.ChevyQ.SimonnetC.OtsuY.Cifuentes-DiazC.et al (2017). Pyk2 modulates hippocampal excitatory synapses and contributes to cognitive deficits in a Huntington’s disease model.Nat. Commun.8:15592. 10.1038/ncomms15592

  • 83

    GiraltA.CouraR.GiraultJ. A. (2016). Pyk2 is essential for astrocytes mobility following brain lesion.Glia64620634. 10.1002/glia.22952

  • 84

    GiraltA.De PinsB.Cifuentes-DiazC.Lopez-MolinaL.FarahA. T.TibleM.et al (2018). PTK2B/Pyk2 overexpression improves a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease.Exp. Neurol.3076273.

  • 85

    GiraultJ. A.CostaA.DerkinderenP.StudlerJ. M.ToutantM. (1999a). FAK and PYK2/CAKbeta in the nervous system: a link between neuronal activity, plasticity and survival?Trends Neurosci.22257263. 10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01358-7

  • 86

    GiraultJ. A.LabesseG.MornonJ. P.CallebautI. (1999b). The N-termini of FAK and JAKs contain divergent band 4.1 domains.Trends Biochem. Sci.245457. 10.1016/s0968-0004(98)01331-0

  • 87

    GiraultJ. A.LabesseG.MornonJ. P.CallebautI. (1998). Janus kinases and focal adhesion kinases play in the 4.1 band: a superfamily of band 4.1 domains important for cell structure and signal transduction.Mol. Med.4751769.

  • 88

    GladdingC. M.CollettV. J.JiaZ.BashirZ. I.CollingridgeG. L.MolnarE. (2009). Tyrosine dephosphorylation regulates AMPAR internalisation in mGluR-LTD.Mol. Cell. Neurosci.40267279. 10.1016/j.mcn.2008.10.014

  • 89

    Goebel-GoodyS. M.BaumM.PaspalasC. D.FernandezS. M.CartyN. C.KurupP.et al (2012). Therapeutic implications for striatal-enriched protein tyrosine phosphatase (STEP) in neuropsychiatric disorders.Pharmacol. Rev.646587.

  • 90

    GrantS. G.O’dellT. J.KarlK. A.SteinP. L.SorianoP.KandelE. R. (1992). Impaired long-term potentiation, spatial learning, and hippocampal development in fyn mutant mice.Science25819031910. 10.1126/science.1361685

  • 91

    GrosshansD. R.ClaytonD. A.CoultrapS. J.BrowningM. D. (2002). LTP leads to rapid surface expression of NMDA but not AMPA receptors in adult rat CA1.Nat. Neurosci.52733. 10.1038/nn779

  • 92

    HaG. E.CheongE. (2017). Spike frequency adaptation in neurons of the central nervous system.Exp. Neurobiol.26179185.

  • 93

    HaasL. T.SalazarS. V.KostylevM. A.UmJ. W.KaufmanA. C.StrittmatterS. M. (2016). Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 couples cellular prion protein to intracellular signalling in Alzheimer’s disease.Brain139526546.

  • 94

    HaasL. T.SalazarS. V.SmithL. M.ZhaoH. R.CoxT. O.HerberC. S.et al (2017). Silent allosteric modulation of mglur5 maintains glutamate signaling while rescuing Alzheimer’s mouse phenotypes.Cell Rep.207688. 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.023

  • 95

    HaasL. T.StrittmatterS. M. (2016). Oligomers of amyloid beta prevent physiological activation of the cellular prion protein-metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 complex by glutamate in Alzheimer disease.J. Biol. Chem.2911711217121. 10.1074/jbc.M116.720664

  • 96

    HaglundK.Ivankovic-DikicI.ShimokawaN.KruhG. D.DikicI. (2004). Recruitment of Pyk2 and Cbl to lipid rafts mediates signals important for actin reorganization in growing neurites.J. Cell Sci.11725572568. 10.1242/jcs.01148

  • 97

    HalfterU. M.DerbyshireZ. E.VaillancourtR. R. (2005). Interferon-gamma-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of MEKK4 via Pyk2 is regulated by annexin II and SHP2 in keratinocytes.Biochem. J.3881728. 10.1042/BJ20041236

  • 98

    HanS.MistryA.ChangJ. S.CunninghamD.GrifforM.BonnetteP. C.et al (2009). Structural characterization of proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 (PYK2) reveals a unique (DFG-out) conformation and enables inhibitor design.J. Biol. Chem.2841319313201. 10.1074/jbc.M809038200

  • 99

    HartD. L.HeidkampM. C.IyengarR.VijayanK.SzotekE. L.BarakatJ. A.et al (2008). CRNK gene transfer improves function and reverses the myosin heavy chain isoenzyme switch during post-myocardial infarction left ventricular remodeling.J. Mol. Cell Cardiol.4593105. 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2008.04.002

  • 100

    HarwoodJ. C.LeonenkoG.SimsR.Escott-PriceV.WilliamsJ.HolmansP. (2021). Defining functional variants associated with Alzheimer’s disease in the induced immune response.Brain Commun.3:fcab083.

  • 101

    HayashiT.HuganirR. L. (2004). Tyrosine phosphorylation and regulation of the AMPA receptor by SRC family tyrosine kinases.J. Neurosci.2461526160.

  • 102

    HeidingerV.ManzerraP.WangX. Q.StrasserU.YuS. P.ChoiD. W.et al (2002). Metabotropic glutamate receptor 1-induced upregulation of NMDA receptor current: mediation through the Pyk2/Src-family kinase pathway in cortical neurons.J. Neurosci.2254525461. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-13-05452.2002

  • 103

    Higa-NakamineS.Okitsu-SakurayamaS.KinaS.YamamotoH. (2020). Fyn-mediated phosphorylation of Pyk2 promotes its activation and dissociation downstream of gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor.FEBS J.28735513564. 10.1111/febs.15231

  • 104

    HildebrandJ. D.SchallerM. D.ParsonsJ. T. (1993). Identification of sequences required for the efficient localization of the focal adhesion kinase, pp125FAK, to cellular focal adhesions.J. Cell Biol.1239931005. 10.1083/jcb.123.4.993

  • 105

    HiregowdaraD.AvrahamH.FuY.LondonR.AvrahamS. (1997). Tyrosine phosphorylation of the related adhesion focal tyrosine kinase in megakaryocytes upon stem cell factor and phorbol myristate acetate stimulation and its association with paxillin.J. Biol. Chem.2721080410810. 10.1074/jbc.272.16.10804

  • 106

    Hirschler-LaszkiewiczI.ChenS. J.BaoL.WangJ.ZhangX. Q.ShanmughapriyaS.et al (2018). The human ion channel TRPM2 modulates neuroblastoma cell survival and mitochondrial function through Pyk2, CREB, and MCU activation.Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.315C571C586. 10.1152/ajpcell.00098.2018

  • 107

    HoelzingerD. B.MarianiL.WeisJ.WoykeT.BerensT. J.McdonoughW. S.et al (2005). Gene expression profile of glioblastoma multiforme invasive phenotype points to new therapeutic targets.Neoplasia7716. 10.1593/neo.04535

  • 108

    HooperC.KillickR.LovestoneS. (2008). The GSK3 hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease.J. Neurochem.10414331439.

  • 109

    HouX. Y.ZhangG. Y.WangD. G.GuanQ. H.YanJ. Z. (2005). Suppression of postsynaptic density protein 95 by antisense oligonucleotides diminishes postischemic pyramidal cell death in rat hippocampal CA1 subfield.Neurosci. Lett.385230233. 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.05.054

  • 110

    HsinH.KimM. J.WangC. F.ShengM. (2010). Proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 regulates hippocampal long-term depression.J. Neurosci.301198311993.

  • 111

    HuangC. C.HsuK. S. (1999). Protein tyrosine kinase is required for the induction of long-term potentiation in the rat hippocampus.J. Physiol.520(Pt 3)783796.

  • 112

    HuangY.LuW.AliD. W.PelkeyK. A.PitcherG. M.LuY. M.et al (2001). CAKbeta/Pyk2 kinase is a signaling link for induction of long-term potentiation in CA1 hippocampus.Neuron29485496. 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00220-3

  • 113

    HumJ. M.DayR. N.BidwellJ. P.WangY.PavalkoF. M. (2014). Mechanical loading in osteocytes induces formation of a Src/Pyk2/MBD2 complex that suppresses anabolic gene expression.PLoS One9:e97942. 10.1371/journal.pone.0097942

  • 114

    HusiH.WardM. A.ChoudharyJ. S.BlackstockW. P.GrantS. G. (2000). Proteomic analysis of NMDA receptor-adhesion protein signaling complexes.Nat. Neurosci.3661669. 10.1038/76615

  • 115

    HyunJ. H.EomK.LeeK. H.HoW. K.LeeS. H. (2013). Activity-dependent downregulation of D-type K+ channel subunit Kv1.2 in rat hippocampal CA3 pyramidal neurons.J. Physiol.59155255540. 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.259002

  • 116

    Ivankovic-DikicI.GronroosE.BlaukatA.BarthB. U.DikicI. (2000). Pyk2 and FAK regulate neurite outgrowth induced by growth factors and integrins.Nat. Cell Biol.2574581. 10.1038/35023515

  • 117

    JankowskyJ. L.FadaleD. J.AndersonJ.XuG. M.GonzalesV.JenkinsN. A.et al (2004). Mutant presenilins specifically elevate the levels of the 42 residue beta-amyloid peptide in vivo: evidence for augmentation of a 42-specific gamma secretase.Hum. Mol. Genet.13159170. 10.1093/hmg/ddh019

  • 118

    JeonS. H.OhS. W.KangU. G.AhnY. M.BaeC. D.ParkJ. B.et al (2001). Electroconvulsive shock increases the phosphorylation of Pyk2 in the rat hippocampus.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.28210261030.

  • 119

    JiaoB.LiuX.ZhouL.WangM. H.ZhouY.XiaoT.et al (2015). Polygenic analysis of late-onset alzheimer’s disease from mainland China.PLoS One10:e0144898. 10.1371/journal.pone.0144898

  • 120

    KangS. S.ZhangZ.LiuX.ManfredssonF. P.HeL.IuvoneP. M.et al (2017). alpha-Synuclein binds and sequesters PIKE-L into Lewy bodies, triggering dopaminergic cell death via AMPK hyperactivation.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A.11411831188. 10.1073/pnas.1618627114

  • 121

    KangU. G.JunS. J.YoonS. C.JeonS.ParkJ. B.ChungC. K.et al (2004). Differential regulation of FAK and PYK2 tyrosine phosphorylation after electroconvulsive shock in the rat brain.Neurosci. Lett.363134138. 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.03.064

  • 122

    KannerS. B.AruffoA.ChanP. Y. (1994). Lymphocyte antigen receptor activation of a focal adhesion kinase-related tyrosine kinase substrate.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A.911048410487.

  • 123

    KatagiriT.TakahashiT.SasakiT.NakamuraS.HattoriS. (2000). Protein-tyrosine kinase Pyk2 is involved in interleukin-2 production by Jurkat T cells via its tyrosine 402.J. Biol. Chem.2751964519652. 10.1074/jbc.M909828199

  • 124

    KaufmanA. C.SalazarS. V.HaasL. T.YangJ.KostylevM. A.JengA. T.et al (2015). Fyn inhibition rescues established memory and synapse loss in Alzheimer mice.Ann. Neurol.77953971. 10.1002/ana.24394

  • 125

    KeelyS. J.CalandrellaS. O.BarrettK. E. (2000). Carbachol-stimulated transactivation of epidermal growth factor receptor and mitogen-activated protein kinase in T(84) cells is mediated by intracellular Ca2+. PYK-2, and p60(src).J. Biol. Chem.2751261912625. 10.1074/jbc.275.17.12619

  • 126

    KilincD.VreulxA. C.MendesT.FlaigA.Marques-CoelhoD.VerschooreM.et al (2020). Pyk2 overexpression in postsynaptic neurons blocks amyloid beta1–42-induced synaptotoxicity in microfluidic co-cultures.Brain Commun.1118. 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa139

  • 127

    KinoshitaY.HunterR. G.GrayJ. D.MesiasR.McewenB. S.BensonD. L.et al (2014). Role for NUP62 depletion and PYK2 redistribution in dendritic retraction resulting from chronic stress.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A.1111613016135. 10.1073/pnas.1418896111

  • 128

    KoJ.KimS.ValtschanoffJ. G.ShinH.LeeJ. R.ShengM.et al (2003). Interaction between liprin-alpha and GIT1 is required for AMPA receptor targeting.J. Neurosci.2316671677. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-05-01667.2003

  • 129

    KohdaK.KakegawaW.MatsudaS.YamamotoT.HiranoH.YuzakiM. (2013). The delta2 glutamate receptor gates long-term depression by coordinating interactions between two AMPA receptor phosphorylation sites.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A.110E948E957. 10.1073/pnas.1218380110

  • 130

    KohlerC.DinekovM.GotzJ. (2013). Active glycogen synthase kinase-3 and tau pathology-related tyrosine phosphorylation in pR5 human tau transgenic mice.Neurobiol. Aging3413691379. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.11.010

  • 131

    KohnoT.MatsudaE.SasakiH.SasakiT. (2008). Protein-tyrosine kinase CAKbeta/PYK2 is activated by binding Ca2+/calmodulin to FERM F2 alpha2 helix and thus forming its dimer.Biochem. J.410513523. 10.1042/BJ20070665

  • 132

    KongL.WangB.YangX.HeB.HaoD.YanL. (2020). Integrin-associated molecules and signalling cross talking in osteoclast cytoskeleton regulation.J. Cell Mol. Med.2432713281. 10.1111/jcmm.15052

  • 133

    KostenJ.BinolfiA.StuiverM.VerziniS.TheilletF. X.BekeiB.et al (2014). Efficient modification of alpha-synuclein serine 129 by protein kinase CK1 requires phosphorylation of tyrosine 125 as a priming event.ACS Chem. Neurosci.512031208. 10.1021/cn5002254

  • 134

    Kruljac-LetunicA.MoellekenJ.KallinA.WielandF.BlaukatA. (2003). The tyrosine kinase Pyk2 regulates Arf1 activity by phosphorylation and inhibition of the Arf-GTPase-activating protein ASAP1.J. Biol. Chem.2782956029570. 10.1074/jbc.M302278200

  • 135

    KumarS.AvrahamS.BhartiA.GoyalJ.PandeyP.KharbandaS. (1999). Negative regulation of PYK2/related adhesion focal tyrosine kinase signal transduction by hematopoietic tyrosine phosphatase SHPTP1.J. Biol. Chem.2743065730663. 10.1074/jbc.274.43.30657

  • 136

    KurupP.ZhangY.XuJ.VenkitaramaniD. V.HaroutunianV.GreengardP.et al (2010). Abeta-mediated NMDA receptor endocytosis in Alzheimer’s disease involves ubiquitination of the tyrosine phosphatase STEP61.J. Neurosci.3059485957. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0157-10.2010

  • 137

    KurupP. K.XuJ.VideiraR. A.OnonenyiC.BaltazarG.LombrosoP. J.et al (2015). STEP61 is a substrate of the E3 ligase parkin and is upregulated in Parkinson’s disease.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A.11212021207. 10.1073/pnas.1417423112

  • 138

    LakkakorpiP. T.BettA. J.LipfertL.RodanG. A.DuongLeT. (2003). PYK2 autophosphorylation, but not kinase activity, is necessary for adhesion-induced association with c-Src, osteoclast spreading, and bone resorption.J. Biol. Chem.2781150211512.

  • 139

    LambertJ. C.Ibrahim-VerbaasC. A.HaroldD.NajA. C.SimsR.BellenguezC.et al (2013). Meta-analysis of 74,046 individuals identifies 11 new susceptibility loci for Alzheimer’s disease.Nat. Genet.4514521458. 10.1038/ng.2802

  • 140

    LarsonJ.MunkacsyE. (2015). Theta-burst LTP.Brain Res.16213850.

  • 141

    LawingcoT.ChaudhuryS.BrookesK. J.Guetta-BaranesT.GuerreiroR.BrasJ.et al (2021). Genetic variants in glutamate-, Abeta-, and tau-related pathways determine polygenic risk for Alzheimer’s disease.Neurobiol. Aging101299.e13299.e21. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.11.009

  • 142

    LeH. T.MaksumovaL.WangJ.PallenC. J. (2006). Reduced NMDA receptor tyrosine phosphorylation in PTPalpha-deficient mouse synaptosomes is accompanied by inhibition of four src family kinases and Pyk2: an upstream role for PTPalpha in NMDA receptor regulation.J. Neurochem.9817981809. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04075.x

  • 143

    LeeG.ThangavelR.SharmaV. M.LiterskyJ. M.BhaskarK.FangS. M.et al (2004). Phosphorylation of tau by fyn: implications for Alzheimer’s disease.J. Neurosci.2423042312.

  • 144

    LeeJ. W.LeeI. H.IimuraT.KongS. W. (2021). Two macrophages, osteoclasts and microglia: from development to pleiotropy.Bone Res.9:11. 10.1038/s41413-020-00134-w

  • 145

    LeeS.SalazarS. V.CoxT. O.StrittmatterS. M. (2019). Pyk2 signaling through Graf1 and RhoA GTPase is required for amyloid-beta oligomer-triggered synapse loss.J. Neurosci.3919101929. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2983-18.2018

  • 146

    LeeS. H.YunS.PiaoZ. H.JeongM.KimD. O.JungH.et al (2010). Suppressor of cytokine signaling 2 regulates IL-15-primed human NK cell function via control of phosphorylated Pyk2.J. Immunol.185917928. 10.4049/jimmunol.1000784

  • 147

    LevS.HernandezJ.MartinezR.ChenA.PlowmanG.SchlessingerJ. (1999). Identification of a novel family of targets of PYK2 related to Drosophila retinal degeneration B (rdgB) protein.Mol. Cell. Biol.1922782288. 10.1128/MCB.19.3.2278

  • 148

    LevS.MorenoH.MartinezR.CanollP.PelesE.MusacchioJ. M.et al (1995). Protein tyrosine kinase PYK2 involved in Ca(2+)-induced regulation of ion channel and MAP kinase functions.Nature376737745.

  • 149

    LiC.GotzJ. (2017). Somatodendritic accumulation of Tau in Alzheimer’s disease is promoted by Fyn-mediated local protein translation.EMBO J.3631203138. 10.15252/embj.201797724

  • 150

    LiC.GotzJ. (2018). Pyk2 is a novel tau tyrosine kinase that is regulated by the tyrosine kinase fyn.J. Alzheimers Dis.64205221. 10.3233/JAD-180054

  • 151

    LiJ.AvrahamH.RogersR. A.RajaS.AvrahamS. (1996). Characterization of RAFTK, a novel focal adhesion kinase, and its integrin-dependent phosphorylation and activation in megakaryocytes.Blood88417428.

  • 152

    LiS.SatoS.YangX.PreisigP. A.AlpernR. J. (2004). Pyk2 activation is integral to acid stimulation of sodium/hydrogen exchanger 3.J. Clin. Invest.11417821789. 10.1172/JCI18046

  • 153

    LiX.DyR. C.CanceW. G.GravesL. M.EarpH. S. (1999). Interactions between two cytoskeleton-associated tyrosine kinases: calcium-dependent tyrosine kinase and focal adhesion tyrosine kinase.J. Biol. Chem.27489178924. 10.1074/jbc.274.13.8917

  • 154

    LiX.YeJ. X.XuM. H.ZhaoM. D.YuanF. L. (2017). Evidence that activation of ASIC1a by acidosis increases osteoclast migration and adhesion by modulating integrin/Pyk2/Src signaling pathway.Osteoporos. Int.2822212231. 10.1007/s00198-017-4017-0

  • 155

    LiY.GrupeA.RowlandC.HolmansP.SeguradoR.AbrahamR.et al (2008). Evidence that common variation in NEDD9 is associated with susceptibility to late-onset Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease.Hum. Mol. Genet.17759767. 10.1093/hmg/ddm348

  • 156

    LiethaD.CaiX.CeccarelliD. F.LiY.SchallerM. D.EckM. J. (2007). Structural basis for the autoinhibition of focal adhesion kinase.Cell12911771187.

  • 157

    LimS. T.ChenX. L.LimY.HansonD. A.VoT. T.HowertonK.et al (2008a). Nuclear FAK promotes cell proliferation and survival through FERM-Enhanced p53 degradation.Mol. Cell.29922. 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.031

  • 158

    LimY.LimS. T.TomarA.GardelM.Bernard-TrifiloJ. A.ChenX. L.et al (2008b). PyK2 and FAK connections to p190Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor regulate RhoA activity, focal adhesion formation, and cell motility.J. Cell Biol.180187203. 10.1083/jcb.200708194

  • 159

    LimS. T.MillerN. L.NamJ. O.ChenX. L.LimY.SchlaepferD. D. (2010). Pyk2 inhibition of p53 as an adaptive and intrinsic mechanism facilitating cell proliferation and survival.J. Biol. Chem.28517431753. 10.1074/jbc.M109.064212

  • 160

    LinC. C.YangC. C.ChenY. W.HsiaoL. D.YangC. M. (2018). Arachidonic acid induces ARE/Nrf2-Dependent heme oxygenase-1 transcription in rat brain astrocytes.Mol. Neurobiol.5533283343. 10.1007/s12035-017-0590-7

  • 161

    LingS.ShengJ. Z.BraunA. P. (2004). The calcium-dependent activity of large-conductance, calcium-activated K+ channels is enhanced by Pyk2- and Hck-induced tyrosine phosphorylation.Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.287C698C706. 10.1152/ajpcell.00030.2004

  • 162

    LipinskiC. A.TranN. L.BayC.KlossJ.McdonoughW. S.BeaudryC.et al (2003). Differential role of proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 and focal adhesion kinase in determining glioblastoma migration and proliferation.Mol. Cancer Res.1323332.

  • 163

    LipinskiC. A.TranN. L.MenashiE.RohlC.KlossJ.BayR. C.et al (2005). The tyrosine kinase pyk2 promotes migration and invasion of glioma cells.Neoplasia7435445.

  • 164

    LipskyB. P.BealsC. R.StauntonD. E. (1998). Leupaxin is a novel LIM domain protein that forms a complex with PYK2.J. Biol. Chem.2731170911713. 10.1074/jbc.273.19.11709

  • 165

    LiuY.HouX. Y.ZhangG. Y.XuT. L. (2003). L-type voltage-gated calcium channel attends regulation of tyrosine phosphorylation of NMDA receptor subunit 2A induced by transient brain ischemia.Brain Res.972142148. 10.1016/s0006-8993(03)02519-8

  • 166

    LiuY.ZhangG.GaoC.HouX. (2001). NMDA receptor activation results in tyrosine phosphorylation of NMDA receptor subunit 2A(NR2A) and interaction of Pyk2 and Src with NR2A after transient cerebral ischemia and reperfusion.Brain Res.9095158. 10.1016/s0006-8993(01)02619-1

  • 167

    LiuY.ZhangG. Y.YanJ. Z.XuT. L. (2005). Suppression of Pyk2 attenuated the increased tyrosine phosphorylation of NMDA receptor subunit 2A after brain ischemia in rat hippocampus.Neurosci. Lett.3795558. 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.12.054

  • 168

    LoftusJ. C.YangZ.KlossJ.DhruvH.TranN. L.RiggsD. L. (2013). A novel interaction between Pyk2 and MAP4K4 is integrated with glioma cell migration.J. Signal Transduct.2013:956580. 10.1155/2013/956580

  • 169

    LombrosoP. J.OgrenM.KurupP.NairnA. C. (2016). Molecular underpinnings of neurodegenerative disorders: striatal-enriched protein tyrosine phosphatase signaling and synaptic plasticity.F1000Res5:F1000FacultyRev-2932. 10.12688/f1000research.8571.1

  • 170

    LuY. M.RoderJ. C.DavidowJ.SalterM. W. (1998). Src activation in the induction of long-term potentiation in CA1 hippocampal neurons.Science27913631367.

  • 171

    LuloJ.YuzawaS.SchlessingerJ. (2009). Crystal structures of free and ligand-bound focal adhesion targeting domain of Pyk2.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.383347352. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.04.011

  • 172

    LuoS. W.ZhangC.ZhangB.KimC. H.QiuY. Z.DuQ. S.et al (2009). Regulation of heterochromatin remodelling and myogenin expression during muscle differentiation by FAK interaction with MBD2.EMBO J.2825682582.

  • 173

    LyonsP. D.DuntyJ. M.SchaeferE. M.SchallerM. D. (2001). Inhibition of the catalytic activity of cell adhesion kinase beta by protein-tyrosine phosphatase-PEST-mediated dephosphorylation.J. Biol. Chem.2762442224431. 10.1074/jbc.M011080200

  • 174

    MaJ.ZhangG. Y.LiuY.YanJ. Z.HaoZ. B. (2004). Lithium suppressed Tyr-402 phosphorylation of proline-rich tyrosine kinase (Pyk2) and interactions of Pyk2 and PSD-95 with NR2A in rat hippocampus following cerebral ischemia.Neurosci. Res.49357362. 10.1016/j.neures.2004.04.004

  • 175

    MacdonaldD. S.WeerapuraM.BeazelyM. A.MartinL.CzerwinskiW.RoderJ. C.et al (2005). Modulation of NMDA receptors by pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide in CA1 neurons requires G alpha q, protein kinase C, and activation of Src.J. Neurosci.251137411384. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3871-05.2005

  • 176

    MangiariniL.SathasivamK.SellerM.CozensB.HarperA.HetheringtonC.et al (1996). Exon 1 of the HD gene with an expanded CAG repeat is sufficient to cause a progressive neurological phenotype in transgenic mice.Cell87493506. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81369-0

  • 177

    ManieS. N.BeckA. R.AstierA.LawS. F.CantyT.HiraiH.et al (1997). Involvement of p130(Cas) and p105(HEF1), a novel Cas-like docking protein, in a cytoskeleton-dependent signaling pathway initiated by ligation of integrin or antigen receptor on human B cells.J. Biol. Chem.27242304236. 10.1074/jbc.272.7.4230

  • 178

    Marie-CardineA.KirchgessnerH.SchravenB. (1999). Molecular alterations of the Fyn-complex occur as late events of human T cell activation.Eur. J. Immunol.2911751187. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199904)29:04<1175::AID-IMMU1175>3.0.CO;2-Z

  • 179

    MastroliaV.Al MassadiO.De PinsB.GiraultJ. A. (2021). Pyk2 in dorsal hippocampus plays a selective role in spatial memory and synaptic plasticity.Sci. Rep.11:16357. 10.1038/s41598-021-95813-x

  • 180

    MatsuyaM.SasakiH.AotoH.MitakaT.NaguraK.OhbaT.et al (1998). Cell adhesion kinase beta forms a complex with a new member. Hic-5, of proteins localized at focal adhesions.J. Biol. Chem.27310031014. 10.1074/jbc.273.2.1003

  • 181

    McShanG. D.ZagozdzonR.ParkS. Y.Zrihan-LichtS.FuY.AvrahamS.et al (2002). Csk homologous kinase associates with RAFTK/Pyk2 in breast cancer cells and negatively regulates its activation and breast cancer cell migration.Int. J. Oncol.21197205.

  • 182

    MelikovaS.DyllaS. J.VerfaillieC. M. (2004). Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase activation mediates proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 phosphorylation and recruitment to beta1-integrins in human CD34+ cells.Exp. Hematol.3210511056. 10.1016/j.exphem.2004.07.018

  • 183

    MenegonA.BurgayaF.BaudotP.DunlapD. D.GiraultJ. A.ValtortaF. (1999). FAK+ and PYK2/CAKbeta, two related tyrosine kinases highly expressed in the central nervous system: similarities and differences in the expression pattern.Eur. J. Neurosci.1137773788. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00798.x

  • 184

    MengX. Q.ZhengK. G.YangY.JiangM. X.ZhangY. L.SunQ. Y.et al (2006). Proline-rich tyrosine kinase2 is involved in F-actin organization during in vitro maturation of rat oocyte.Reproduction132859867. 10.1530/rep.1.01212

  • 185

    MeyerA. N.GastwirtR. F.SchlaepferD. D.DonoghueD. J. (2004). The cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase Pyk2 as a novel effector of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 activation.J. Biol. Chem.2792845028457. 10.1074/jbc.M403335200

  • 186

    MillerB. A.WangJ.SongJ.ZhangX. Q.Hirschler-LaszkiewiczI.ShanmughapriyaS.et al (2019). Trpm2 enhances physiological bioenergetics and protects against pathological oxidative cardiac injury: role of Pyk2 phosphorylation.J Cell Physiol. Online ahead of print. 10.1002/jcp.28146

  • 187

    MitchellR. M.TajuddinN.CampbellE. M.NeafseyE. J.CollinsM. A. (2016). Ethanol preconditioning of rat cerebellar cultures targets NMDA receptors to the synapse and enhances peroxiredoxin 2 expression.Brain Res.1642163169. 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.03.011

  • 188

    MiuraY.TohyamaY.HishitaT.LalaA.De NardinE.YoshidaY.et al (2000). Pyk2 and Syk participate in functional activation of granulocytic HL-60 cells in a different manner.Blood9617331739.

  • 189

    MiyazakiT.TakaokaA.NogueiraL.DikicI.FujiiH.TsujinoS.et al (1998). Pyk2 is a downstream mediator of the IL-2 receptor-coupled Jak signaling pathway.Genes Dev.12770775. 10.1101/gad.12.6.770

  • 190

    MolletG.SilbermannF.DelousM.SalomonR.AntignacC.SaunierS. (2005). Characterization of the nephrocystin/nephrocystin-4 complex and subcellular localization of nephrocystin-4 to primary cilia and centrosomes.Hum. Mol. Genet.14645656. 10.1093/hmg/ddi061

  • 191

    MontalbanE.Al-MassadiO.Sancho-BalsellsA.BritoV.De PinsB.AlberchJ.et al (2019). Pyk2 in the amygdala modulates chronic stress sequelae via PSD-95-related micro-structural changes.Transl. Psychiatry9:3. 10.1038/s41398-018-0352-y

  • 192

    MoultP. R.GladdingC. M.SandersonT. M.FitzjohnS. M.BashirZ. I.MolnarE.et al (2006). Tyrosine phosphatases regulate AMPA receptor trafficking during metabotropic glutamate receptor-mediated long-term depression.J. Neurosci.2625442554. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4322-05.2006

  • 193

    NakamuraI.LipfertL.RodanG. A.LeT. D. (2001). Convergence of alpha(v)beta(3) integrin- and macrophage colony stimulating factor-mediated signals on phospholipase Cgamma in prefusion osteoclasts.J. Cell Biol.152361373. 10.1083/jcb.152.2.361

  • 194

    NakamuraT.YamashitaH.NaganoY.TakahashiT.AvrahamS.AvrahamH.et al (2002). Activation of Pyk2/RAFTK induces tyrosine phosphorylation of alpha-synuclein via Src-family kinases.FEBS Lett.521190194. 10.1016/s0014-5793(02)02861-2

  • 195

    NakamuraT.YamashitaH.TakahashiT.NakamuraS. (2001). Activated Fyn phosphorylates alpha-synuclein at tyrosine residue 125.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.28010851092. 10.1006/bbrc.2000.4253

  • 196

    NakazawaT.KomaiS.TezukaT.HisatsuneC.UmemoriH.SembaK.et al (2001). Characterization of Fyn-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation sites on GluR epsilon 2 (NR2B) subunit of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor.J. Biol. Chem.276693699. 10.1074/jbc.M008085200

  • 197

    NettiksimmonsJ.TranahG.EvansD. S.YokoyamaJ. S.YaffeK. (2016). Gene-based aggregate SNP associations between candidate AD genes and cognitive decline.Age (Dordr)38:41. 10.1007/s11357-016-9885-2

  • 198

    NguyenP. V.KandelE. R. (1997). Brief theta-burst stimulation induces a transcription-dependent late phase of LTP requiring cAMP in area CA1 of the mouse hippocampus.Learn. Mem.4230243. 10.1101/lm.4.2.230

  • 199

    NicodemoA. A.PampilloM.FerreiraL. T.DaleL. B.CreganT.RibeiroF. M.et al (2010). Pyk2 uncouples metabotropic glutamate receptor G protein signaling but facilitates ERK1/2 activation.Mol. Brain3:4. 10.1186/1756-6606-3-4

  • 200

    NicollR. A. (2017). A brief history of long-term potentiation.Neuron93281290.

  • 201

    NiesS. H.TakahashiH.HerberC. S.HuttnerA.ChaseA.StrittmatterS. M. (2021). Spreading of Alzheimer Tau seeds is enhanced by aging and template matching with limited impact of amyloid-beta.J. Biol. Chem. Online ahead of print. 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101159

  • 202

    NiimuraM.MoussaR.BissoonN.Ikeda-DouglasC.MilgramN. W.GurdJ. W. (2005). Changes in phosphorylation of the NMDA receptor in the rat hippocampus induced by status epilepticus.J. Neurochem.9213771385.

  • 203

    NongY.HuangY. Q.JuW.KaliaL. V.AhmadianG.WangY. T.et al (2003). Glycine binding primes NMDA receptor internalization.Nature422302307.

  • 204

    OakleyH.ColeS. L.LoganS.MausE.ShaoP.CraftJ.et al (2006). Intraneuronal beta-amyloid aggregates, neurodegeneration, and neuron loss in transgenic mice with five familial Alzheimer’s disease mutations: potential factors in amyloid plaque formation.J. Neurosci.261012910140. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1202-06.2006

  • 205

    OddoS.CaccamoA.ShepherdJ. D.MurphyM. P.GoldeT. E.KayedR.et al (2003). Triple-transgenic model of Alzheimer’s disease with plaques and tangles: intracellular Abeta and synaptic dysfunction.Neuron39409421.

  • 206

    O’DellT. J.KandelE. R.GrantS. G. (1991). Long-term potentiation in the hippocampus is blocked by tyrosine kinase inhibitors.Nature353558560.

  • 207

    OhbaT.IshinoM.AotoH.SasakiT. (1998). Interaction of two proline-rich sequences of cell adhesion kinase beta with SH3 domains of p130Cas-related proteins and a GTPase-activating protein.Graf. Biochem. J.330(Pt 3)12491254. 10.1042/bj3301249

  • 208

    OkigakiM.DavisC.FalascaM.HarrochS.FelsenfeldD. P.SheetzM. P.et al (2003). Pyk2 regulates multiple signaling events crucial for macrophage morphology and migration.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A.1001074010745. 10.1073/pnas.1834348100

  • 209

    Okitsu-SakurayamaS.Higa-NakamineS.ToriharaH.TakahashiH.HigashiyamaS.YamamotoH. (2018). Activation of Pyk2 by CaM kinase II in cultured hypothalamic neurons and gonadotroph cells.J. Cell Physiol.23468656875. 10.1002/jcp.27443

  • 210

    PadhyB.HayatB.NandaG. G.MohantyP. P.AloneD. P. (2017). Pseudoexfoliation and Alzheimer’s associated CLU risk variant, rs2279590, lies within an enhancer element and regulates CLU. EPHX2 and PTK2B gene expression.Hum. Mol. Genet.2645194529. 10.1093/hmg/ddx329

  • 211

    ParkS. Y.AvrahamH.AvrahamS. (2000). Characterization of the tyrosine kinases RAFTK/Pyk2 and FAK in nerve growth factor-induced neuronal differentiation.J. Biol. Chem.2751976819777. 10.1074/jbc.M909932199

  • 212

    ParkS. Y.AvrahamH. K.AvrahamS. (2004). RAFTK/Pyk2 activation is mediated by trans-acting autophosphorylation in a Src-independent manner.J. Biol. Chem.2793331533322. 10.1074/jbc.M313527200

  • 213

    PfaffM.JurdicP. (2001). Podosomes in osteoclast-like cells: structural analysis and cooperative roles of paxillin, proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 (Pyk2) and integrin alphaVbeta3.J. Cell Sci.11427752786.

  • 214

    PitcherG. M.KaliaL. V.NgD.GoodfellowN. M.YeeK. T.LambeE. K.et al (2011). Schizophrenia susceptibility pathway neuregulin 1-ErbB4 suppresses Src upregulation of NMDA receptors.Nat. Med.17470478. 10.1038/nm.2315

  • 215

    PodarK.TaiY. T.LinB. K.NarsimhanR. P.SattlerM.KijimaT.et al (2002). Vascular endothelial growth factor-induced migration of multiple myeloma cells is associated with beta 1 integrin- and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-dependent PKC alpha activation.J. Biol. Chem.27778757881. 10.1074/jbc.M109068200

  • 216

    PrybylowskiK.ChangK.SansN.KanL.ViciniS.WentholdR. J. (2005). The synaptic localization of NR2B-containing NMDA receptors is controlled by interactions with PDZ proteins and AP-2.Neuron47845857. 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.08.016

  • 217

    QianD. P.LevS.Van OersN. S. C.DikicI.SchlessingerJ.WeissA. (1997). Tyrosine phosphorylation of Pyk2 is selectively regulated by Fyn during TCR signaling.J. Exp. Med.18512531259. 10.1084/jem.185.7.1253

  • 218

    RiggsD.YangZ.KlossJ.LoftusJ. C. (2011). The Pyk2 FERM regulates Pyk2 complex formation and phosphorylation.Cell. Signal.23288296. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2010.09.015

  • 219

    Rolon-ReyesK.KucheryavykhY. V.CubanoL. A.InyushinM.SkatchkovS. N.EatonM. J.et al (2015). Microglia activate migration of glioma cells through a Pyk2 intracellular pathway.PLoS One10:e0131059. 10.1371/journal.pone.0131059

  • 220

    RoskoskiR.Jr. (2015). Src protein-tyrosine kinase structure, mechanism, and small molecule inhibitors.Pharmacol. Res.94925.

  • 221

    RunneH.RegulierE.KuhnA.ZalaD.GokceO.PerrinV.et al (2008). Dysregulation of gene expression in primary neuron models of Huntington’s disease shows that polyglutamine-related effects on the striatal transcriptome may not be dependent on brain circuitry.J. Neurosci.2897239731. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3044-08.2008

  • 222

    SaavedraA.GiraltA.RueL.XifroX.XuJ.OrtegaZ.et al (2011). Striatal-enriched protein tyrosine phosphatase expression and activity in Huntington’s disease: a STEP in the resistance to excitotoxicity.J. Neurosci.3181508162. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3446-10.2011

  • 223

    Saez-AtienzarS.MasliahE. (2020). Cellular senescence and Alzheimer disease: the egg and the chicken scenario.Nat. Rev. Neurosci.21433444.

  • 224

    SahuS. N.KhadeerM. A.RobertsonB. W.NunezS. M.BaiG.GuptaA. (2007). Association of leupaxin with Src in osteoclasts.Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.292C581C590.

  • 225

    SalazarS. V.CoxT. O.LeeS.BrodyA. H.ChyungA. S.HaasL. T.et al (2019). Alzheimer’s disease risk factor Pyk2 mediates amyloid-beta-induced synaptic dysfunction and loss.J. Neurosci.39758772. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1873-18.2018

  • 226

    SalterM. W.KaliaL. V. (2004). Src kinases: a hub for NMDA receptor regulation.Nat. Rev. Neurosci.5317328.

  • 227

    SanchoV.Nuche-BerenguerB.JensenR. T. (2012). The Src kinase Yes is activated in pancreatic acinar cells by gastrointestinal hormones/neurotransmitters, but not pancreatic growth factors, which stimulate its association with numerous other signaling molecules.Biochim. Biophys. Acta182312851294. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.05.015

  • 228

    SanjayA.HoughtonA.NeffL.DidomenicoE.BardelayC.AntoineE.et al (2001). Cbl associates with Pyk2 and Src to regulate Src kinase activity, alpha(v)beta(3) integrin-mediated signaling, cell adhesion, and osteoclast motility.J. Cell Biol.152181195. 10.1083/jcb.152.1.181

  • 229

    SanzP.Garcia-GimenoM. A. (2020). Reactive glia inflammatory signaling pathways and epilepsy.Int. J. Mol. Sci.21:4096.

  • 230

    SasakiH.NaguraK.IshinoM.TobiokaH.KotaniK.SasakiT. (1995). Cloning and characterization of cell adhesion kinase beta, a novel protein-tyrosine kinase of the focal adhesion kinase subfamily.J. Biol. Chem.2702120621219. 10.1074/jbc.270.36.21206

  • 231

    SaudouF.HumbertS. (2016). The biology of huntingtin.Neuron89910926.

  • 232

    SayasC. L.AriaensA.PonsioenB.MoolenaarW. H. (2006). GSK-3 is activated by the tyrosine kinase Pyk2 during LPA1-mediated neurite retraction.Mol. Biol. Cell1718341844. 10.1091/mbc.e05-07-0688

  • 233

    SchallerM. D. (2010). Cellular functions of FAK kinases: insight into molecular mechanisms and novel functions.J. Cell Sci.12310071013.

  • 234

    SchindlerE. M.BaumgartnerM.GribbenE. M.LiL.EfimovaT. (2007). The role of proline-rich protein tyrosine kinase 2 in differentiation-dependent signaling in human epidermal keratinocytes.J. Invest. Dermatol.12710941106. 10.1038/sj.jid.5700662

  • 235

    SchmidtM. H. H.ChenB.RandazzoL. M.BoglerO. (2003). SETA/CIN85/Ruk and its binding partner AIP1 associate with diverse cytoskeletal elements, including FAKs, and modulate cell adhesion.J. Cell Sci.11628452855. 10.1242/jcs.00522

  • 236

    ScholzR.BerberichS.RathgeberL.KollekerA.KohrG.KornauH. C. (2010). AMPA receptor signaling through BRAG2 and Arf6 critical for long-term synaptic depression.Neuron66768780. 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.05.003

  • 237

    SchwartzentruberJ.CooperS.LiuJ. Z.Barrio-HernandezI.BelloE.KumasakaN.et al (2021). Genome-wide meta-analysis, fine-mapping and integrative prioritization implicate new Alzheimer’s disease risk genes.Nat. Genet.53392402.

  • 238

    SeaboldG. K.BuretteA.LimI. A.WeinbergR. J.HellJ. W. (2003). Interaction of the tyrosine kinase Pyk2 with the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor complex via the Src homology 3 domains of PSD-95 and SAP102.J. Biol. Chem.2781504015048. 10.1074/jbc.M212825200

  • 239

    Serrano-PozoA.FroschM. P.MasliahE.HymanB. T. (2011). Neuropathological alterations in Alzheimer disease.Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med.1:a006189.

  • 240

    SheehanT. P.NeveR. L.DumanR. S.RussellD. S. (2003). Antidepressant effect of the calcium-activated tyrosine kinase Pyk2 in the lateral septum.Biol. Psychiatry54540551. 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01815-2

  • 241

    ShiC. S.SinnarajahS.ChoH.KozasaT.KehrlJ. H. (2000). G13alpha-mediated PYK2 activation. PYK2 is a mediator of G13alpha - induced serum response element-dependent transcription.J. Biol. Chem.2752447024476. 10.1074/jbc.M908449199

  • 242

    SicilianoJ. C.GelmanM.GiraultJ. A. (1994). Depolarization and neurotransmitters increase neuronal protein tyrosine phosphorylation.J. Neurochem.62950959.

  • 243

    SicilianoJ. C.ToutantM.DerkinderenP.SasakiT.GiraultJ. A. (1996). Differential regulation of proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2/cell adhesion kinase beta (PYK2/CAKbeta) and pp125(FAK) by glutamate and depolarization in rat hippocampus.J. Biol. Chem.2712894228946. 10.1074/jbc.271.46.28942

  • 244

    SnyderE. M.NongY.AlmeidaC. G.PaulS.MoranT.ChoiE. Y.et al (2005). Regulation of NMDA receptor trafficking by amyloid-beta.Nat. Neurosci.810511058.

  • 245

    SongC.ZhangY.ParsonsC. G.LiuY. F. (2003). Expression of polyglutamine-expanded huntingtin induces tyrosine phosphorylation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors.J. Biol. Chem.2783336433369. 10.1074/jbc.M304240200

  • 246

    StatevaS. R.SalasV.AnguitaE.BenaimG.VillaloboA. (2015). Ca2+/Calmodulin and apo-calmodulin both bind to and enhance the tyrosine kinase activity of c-Src.PLoS One10:e0128783. 10.1371/journal.pone.0128783

  • 247

    SulzmaierF. J.JeanC.SchlaepferD. D. (2014). FAK in cancer: mechanistic findings and clinical applications.Nat. Rev. Cancer14598610.

  • 248

    SunY.SavaneninA.ReddyP. H.LiuY. F. (2001). Polyglutamine-expanded huntingtin promotes sensitization of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors via post-synaptic density 95.J. Biol. Chem.2762471324718. 10.1074/jbc.M103501200

  • 249

    SuoL.LuH.YingG.CapecchiM. R.WuQ. (2012). Protocadherin clusters and cell adhesion kinase regulate dendrite complexity through Rho GTPase.J. Mol. Cell. Biol.4362376.

  • 250

    TakahashiT.YamashitaH.NaganoY.NakamuraT.OhmoriH.AvrahamH.et al (2003). Identification and characterization of a novel Pyk2/related adhesion focal tyrosine kinase-associated protein that inhibits alpha-synuclein phosphorylation.J. Biol. Chem.2784222542233. 10.1074/jbc.M213217200

  • 251

    TakaokaA.TanakaN.MitaniY.MiyazakiT.FujiiH.SatoM.et al (1999). Protein tyrosine kinase Pyk2 mediates the Jak-dependent activation of MAPK and Stat1 in IFN-gamma, but not IFN-alpha, signaling.EMBO J.1824802488. 10.1093/emboj/18.9.2480

  • 252

    TangH.ZhaoZ. J.LandonE. J.InagamiT. (2000). Regulation of calcium-sensitive tyrosine kinase Pyk2 by angiotensin II in endothelial cells. Roles of Yes tyrosine kinase and tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2.J. Biol. Chem.27583898396. 10.1074/jbc.275.12.8389

  • 253

    TangY.YeM.DuY.QiuX.LvX.YangW.et al (2015). EGFR signaling upregulates surface expression of the GluN2B-containing NMDA receptor and contributes to long-term potentiation in the hippocampus.Neuroscience304109121. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.07.021

  • 254

    ThomasJ. W.EllisB.BoernerR. J.KnightW. B.WhiteG. C.IISchallerM. D. (1998). SH2- and SH3-mediated interactions between focal adhesion kinase and Src.J. Biol. Chem.273577583.

  • 255

    TianD.LitvakV.LevS. (2000). Cerebral ischemia and seizures induce tyrosine phosphorylation of PYK2 in neurons and microglial cells.J. Neurosci.2064786487. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-17-06478.2000

  • 256

    TitleyH. K.BrunelN.HanselC. (2017). Toward a neurocentric view of learning.Neuron951932. 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.05.021

  • 257

    TokiwaG.DikicI.LevS.SchlessingerJ. (1996). Activation of Pyk2 by stress signals and coupling with JNK signaling pathway.Science273792794.

  • 258

    ToutantM.CostaA.StudlerJ. M.KadareG.CarnaudM.GiraultJ. A. (2002). Alternative splicing controls the mechanisms of FAK autophosphorylation.Mol. Cell. Biol.2277317743. 10.1128/MCB.22.22.7731-7743.2002

  • 259

    TrepanierC. H.JacksonM. F.MacdonaldJ. F. (2012). Regulation of NMDA receptors by the tyrosine kinase Fyn.FEBS J.2791219.

  • 260

    TseK. W.LinK. B.Dang-LawsonM.Guzman-PerezA.AspnesG. E.BuckbinderL.et al (2012). Small molecule inhibitors of the Pyk2 and FAK kinases modulate chemoattractant-induced migration, adhesion and Akt activation in follicular and marginal zone B cells.Cell Immunol.2754754. 10.1016/j.cellimm.2012.03.002

  • 261

    UedaH.AbbiS.ZhengC.GuanJ. L. (2000). Suppression of Pyk2 kinase and cellular activities by FIP200.J. Cell Biol.149423430. 10.1083/jcb.149.2.423

  • 262

    UzomaI.HuJ.CoxE.XiaS.ZhouJ.RhoH. S.et al (2018). Global identification of small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) substrates reveals crosstalk between SUMOylation and phosphorylation promotes cell migration.Mol. Cell. Proteomics17871888. 10.1074/mcp.RA117.000014

  • 263

    van der HorstE. H.WeberI.UllrichA. (2005). Tyrosine phosphorylation of PYK2 mediates heregulin-induced glioma invasion: novel heregulin/HER3-stimulated signaling pathway in glioma.Int. J. Cancer113689698. 10.1002/ijc.20643

  • 264

    VanarottiM. S.FinkelsteinD. B.GuibaoC. D.NourseA.MillerD. J.ZhengJ. J. (2016). Structural basis for the interaction between Pyk2-FAT domain and leupaxin LD repeats.Biochemistry5513321345. 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b01274

  • 265

    VanarottiM. S.MillerD. J.GuibaoC. D.NourseA.ZhengJ. J. (2014). Structural and mechanistic insights into the interaction between Pyk2 and paxillin LD motifs.J. Mol. Biol.42639854001. 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.08.014

  • 266

    VenkitaramaniD. V.MouraP. J.PicciottoM. R.LombrosoP. J. (2011). Striatal-enriched protein tyrosine phosphatase (STEP) knockout mice have enhanced hippocampal memory.Eur. J. Neurosci.3322882298. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07687.x

  • 267

    VermaN.MullerA. K.KothariC.PanayotopoulouE.KedanA.SelitrennikM.et al (2017). Targeting of PYK2 synergizes with EGFR antagonists in Basal-like TNBC and circumvents HER3-Associated resistance via the NEDD4-NDRG1 Axis.Cancer Res.778699.

  • 268

    VisselB.KruppJ. J.HeinemannS. F.WestbrookG. L. (2001). A use-dependent tyrosine dephosphorylation of NMDA receptors is independent of ion flux.Nat. Neurosci.4587596.

  • 269

    VomaskeJ.VarnumS.MelnychukR.SmithP.Pasa-TolicL.ShutthanandanJ. I.et al (2010). HCMV pUS28 initiates pro-migratory signaling via activation of Pyk2 kinase.Herpesviridae1:2. 10.1186/2042-4280-1-2

  • 270

    WalkiewiczK. W.GiraultJ. A.AroldS. T. (2015). How to awaken your nanomachines: Site-specific activation of focal adhesion kinases through ligand interactions.Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol.1196071. 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2015.06.001

  • 271

    WangH.ReiserG. (2003). The role of the Ca2+-sensitive tyrosine kinase Pyk2 and Src in thrombin signalling in rat astrocytes.J. Neurochem.8413491357. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.01637.x

  • 272

    WangJ. Q.GuoM. L.JinD. Z.XueB.FibuchE. E.MaoL. M. (2014). Roles of subunit phosphorylation in regulating glutamate receptor function.Eur. J. Pharmacol.728183187.

  • 273

    WangQ.XieY.DuQ. S.WuX. J.FengX.MeiL.et al (2003). Regulation of the formation of osteoclastic actin rings by proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 interacting with gelsolin.J. Cell Biol.160565575.

  • 274

    WangX.LopezO.SweetR. A.BeckerJ. T.DekoskyS. T.BarmadaM. M.et al (2015). Genetic determinants of survival in patients with Alzheimer’s disease.J. Alzheimers. Dis.45651658.

  • 275

    WangX.YangY.GuoX.SampsonE. R.HsuC. L.TsaiM. Y.et al (2002). Suppression of androgen receptor transactivation by Pyk2 via interaction and phosphorylation of the ARA55 coregulator.J. Biol. Chem.2771542615431. 10.1074/jbc.M111218200

  • 276

    WhyteA. J.Trinoskey-RiceG.DaviesR. A.WoonE. P.FosterS. L.ShapiroL. P.et al (2021). Cell adhesion factors in the orbitofrontal cortex control cue-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking and amygdala-dependent goal seeking.J Neurosci.4159235936. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0781-20.2021

  • 277

    WonS.LevyJ. M.NicollR. A.RocheK. W. (2017). MAGUKs: multifaceted synaptic organizers.Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.4394101.

  • 278

    WooJ. A.RohS. E.LakshmanaM. K.KangD. E. (2012). Pivotal role of RanBP9 in integrin-dependent focal adhesion signaling and assembly.FASEB J.2616721681. 10.1096/fj.11-194423

  • 279

    WooN. H.DuffyS. N.AbelT.NguyenP. V. (2003). Temporal spacing of synaptic stimulation critically modulates the dependence of LTP on cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase.Hippocampus13293300.

  • 280

    WrennR. W. (2001). Carbachol stimulates TYR phosphorylation and association of PKCdelta and PYK2 in pancreas.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.282882886. 10.1006/bbrc.2001.4657

  • 281

    WuR. F.XuY. C.MaZ.NwariakuF. E.SarosiG. A.Jr.et al (2005). Subcellular targeting of oxidants during endothelial cell migration.J. Cell Biol.171893904.

  • 282

    XieJ.AllenK. H.MarguetA.BerghornK. A.BlissS. P.NavratilA. M.et al (2008). Analysis of the calcium-dependent regulation of proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 by gonadotropin-releasing hormone.Mol. Endocrinol.2223222335. 10.1210/me.2008-0061

  • 283

    XieY. F.BelroseJ. C.LeiG.TymianskiM.MoriY.MacdonaldJ. F.et al (2011). Dependence of NMDA/GSK-3beta mediated metaplasticity on TRPM2 channels at hippocampal CA3-CA1 synapses.Mol. Brain4:44. 10.1186/1756-6606-4-44

  • 284

    XiongW. C.MacklemM.ParsonsJ. T. (1998). Expression and characterization of splice variants of PYK2, a focal adhesion kinase-related protein.J. Cell Sci.111(Pt 14)19811991.

  • 285

    XuC. S.WangZ. F.HuangX. D.DaiL. M.CaoC. J.LiZ. Q. (2015). Involvement of ROS-alpha v beta 3 integrin-FAK/Pyk2 in the inhibitory effect of melatonin on U251 glioma cell migration and invasion under hypoxia.J. Transl. Med.13:95. 10.1186/s12967-015-0454-8

  • 286

    XuJ.ChatterjeeM.BaguleyT. D.BrouilletteJ.KurupP.GhoshD.et al (2014). Inhibitor of the tyrosine phosphatase STEP reverses cognitive deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease.PLoS Biol.12:e1001923. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001923

  • 287

    XuJ.KurupP.BartosJ. A.PatriarchiT.HellJ. W.LombrosoP. J. (2012). Striatal-enriched protein-tyrosine phosphatase (STEP) regulates Pyk2 kinase activity.J. Biol. Chem.2872094220956.

  • 288

    YakaR.ThorntonC.VagtsA. J.PhamluongK.BonciA.RonD. (2002). NMDA receptor function is regulated by the inhibitory scaffolding protein.RACK1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A.9957105715.

  • 289

    YamamotoS.ShimizuS.KiyonakaS.TakahashiN.WajimaT.HaraY.et al (2008). TRPM2-mediated Ca2+influx induces chemokine production in monocytes that aggravates inflammatory neutrophil infiltration.Nat. Med.14738747. 10.1038/nm1758

  • 290

    YamasakiM.AraiH.AshidaN.IshiiK.KitaT. (2001). Monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 causes differential signalling mediated by proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 in THP-1 cells.Biochem. J.355751756. 10.1042/bj3550751

  • 291

    YanS. R.NovakM. J. (1999). Beta2 integrin-dependent phosphorylation of protein-tyrosine kinase Pyk2 stimulated by tumor necrosis factor alpha and fMLP in human neutrophils adherent to fibrinogen.FEBS Lett.4513338. 10.1016/s0014-5793(99)00539-6

  • 292

    YanX. L.LiuD. H.ZhangG. L.HuS. Q.ChenY. G.XuT. (2015). S-Nitrosylation of proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 involves its activation induced by oxygen-glucose deprivation.Neurosci. Lett.5979096. 10.1016/j.neulet.2015.04.043

  • 293

    YangS.RoselliF.PatchevA. V.YuS.AlmeidaO. F. (2013). Non-receptor-tyrosine kinases integrate fast glucocorticoid signaling in hippocampal neurons.J. Biol. Chem.2882372523739. 10.1074/jbc.M113.470146

  • 294

    YuH.LiX.MarchettoG. S.DyR.HunterD.CalvoB.et al (1996). Activation of a novel calcium-dependent protein-tyrosine kinase. Correlation with c-Jun N-terminal kinase but not mitogen-activated protein kinase activation.J. Biol. Chem.2712999329998. 10.1074/jbc.271.47.29993

  • 295

    ZalewskaT.BielawskiA.StanaszekL.WieczerzakK.Ziemka-NaleczM.NalepaI. (2016). Imipramine administration induces changes in the phosphorylation of FAK and PYK2 and modulates signaling pathways related to their activity.Biochim. Biophys. Acta1860424433. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2015.11.008

  • 296

    ZhangK.YanJ.WangL.TianX.ZhangT.GuoL.et al (2018). The Pyk2/MCU pathway in the rat middle cerebral artery occlusion model of ischemic stroke.Neurosci. Res.1315262. 10.1016/j.neures.2017.09.002

  • 297

    ZhangS.GuoD.JiangL.ZhangQ.QiuX.WangE. (2008). SOCS3 inhibiting migration of A549 cells correlates with PYK2 signaling in vitro.BMC Cancer8:150. 10.1186/1471-2407-8-150

  • 298

    ZhangW. B.RossP. J.TuY.WangY.BeggsS.SengarA. S.et al (2016). Fyn Kinase regulates GluN2B subunit-dominant NMDA receptors in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons.Sci. Rep.6:23837. 10.1038/srep23837

  • 299

    ZhangY.KurupP.XuJ.CartyN.FernandezS. M.NygaardH. B.et al (2010). Genetic reduction of striatal-enriched tyrosine phosphatase (STEP) reverses cognitive and cellular deficits in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A.1071901419019. 10.1073/pnas.1013543107

  • 300

    ZhaoC.DuC. P.PengY.XuZ.SunC. C.LiuY.et al (2015). The upregulation of NR2A-containing N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor function by tyrosine phosphorylation of postsynaptic density 95 via facilitating Src/proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 activation.Mol. Neurobiol.51500511. 10.1007/s12035-014-8796-4

  • 301

    ZhaoM.FinlayD.ZharkikhI.VuoriK. (2016). Novel role of Src in priming Pyk2 phosphorylation.PLoS One11:e0149231. 10.1371/journal.pone.0149231

  • 302

    ZhengC.XingZ.BianZ. C.GuoC.AkbayA.WarnerL.et al (1998). Differential regulation of Pyk2 and focal adhesion kinase (FAK). The C-terminal domain of FAK confers response to cell adhesion.J. Biol. Chem.27323842389. 10.1074/jbc.273.4.2384

  • 303

    ZhuX.BaoY.GuoY.YangW. (2018). Proline-Rich protein tyrosine kinase 2 in inflammation and Cancer.Cancers (Basel)10:139.

  • 304

    Zrihan-LichtS.AvrahamS.JiangS.FuY.AvrahamH. K. (2004). Coupling of RAFTK/Pyk2 kinase with c-Abl and their role in the migration of breast cancer cells.Int. J. Oncol.24153159.

  • 305

    Zrihan-LichtS.FuY.SettlemanJ.SchinkmannK.ShawL.KeydarI.et al (2000). RAFTK/Pyk2 tyrosine kinase mediates the association of p190 RhoGAP with RasGAP and is involved in breast cancer cell invasion.Oncogene1913181328. 10.1038/sj.onc.1203422

  • 306

    ZwickE.WallaschC.DaubH.UllrichA. (1999). Distinct calcium-dependent pathways of epidermal growth factor receptor transactivation and PYK2 tyrosine phosphorylation in PC12 cells.J. Biol. Chem.2742098920996. 10.1074/jbc.274.30.20989

Summary

Keywords

signal transduction, protein phosphorylation, glutamate receptors, learning and memory, neurodegenerative diseases

Citation

de Pins B, Mendes T, Giralt A and Girault J-A (2021) The Non-receptor Tyrosine Kinase Pyk2 in Brain Function and Neurological and Psychiatric Diseases. Front. Synaptic Neurosci. 13:749001. doi: 10.3389/fnsyn.2021.749001

Received

28 July 2021

Accepted

14 September 2021

Published

06 October 2021

Volume

13 - 2021

Edited by

Emmanuel Valjent, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), France

Reviewed by

John Q. Wang, University of Missouri-Kansas City, United States; Paulo S. Pinheiro, University of Coimbra, Portugal

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Jean-Antoine Girault,

†Present address: Benoit de Pins, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics