Impact Factor 3.394

The world's 3rd most-cited Physiology journal

Original Research ARTICLE Provisionally accepted The full-text will be published soon. Notify me

Front. Physiol. | doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01647

Modulations of neuroendocrine stress responses during confinement in Antarctica and the role of hypobaric hypoxia

 Claudia Strewe1, Detlef Thieme2,  Carole Dangoisse3, Barbara Fiedel4, Floris van den Berg3, Holger Bauer4,  Alex Salam3, Petra Gössmann-Lang4,  Patrizia Campolongo5,  Dominique Moser6,  Roel Quintens7,  Marjan Moreels7,  Sarah Baatout7, 8, Eberhard Kohlberg4,  Gustav Schelling6*, Alexander Chouker6* and Matthias Feuerecker6
  • 1Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Research group Stress & Immunity, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany
  • 2Institut für Dopinganalytik und Sportbiochemie (IDAS), Germany
  • 3IPEV/PNRA-ESA Antarctic Program, Antarctica
  • 4Alfred Wegener Institut Helmholtz Zentrum für Polar und Meeresforschung, Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Deutscher Forschungszentren (HZ), Germany
  • 5Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
  • 6Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Germany
  • 7Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, Belgium
  • 8Department of Biotechnology, Ghent University, Belgium

The Antarctic continent is an environment of extreme conditions. Only few research stations exist that are occupied throughout the year. The German station Neumayer III and the French-Italian Concordia station are such research platforms and human outposts. The seasonal shifts of complete daylight (summer) to complete darkness (winter) as well as massive changes in outside temperatures (down to -80 °C at Concordia) during winter result in complete confinement of the crews from the outside world. In addition, the crew at Concordia is subjected to hypobaric hypoxia of ~ 650 hPa as the station is situated at high altitude (3,233 m).
We studied three expedition crews at Neumayer III (sea level) (n = 16) and two at Concordia (high altitude) (n = 15) to determine the effects of hypobaric hypoxia on hormonal/metabolic stress parameters (endocannabinoids, catecholamines, glucocorticoids) and evaluated the psychological stress over a period of 11 months including winter confinement.
In the Neumayer III (sea level) crew endocannabinoid (EC) and n-acylethanolamide (NAE) concentrations increased significantly already at the beginning of the deployment (p < 0.001) whereas catecholamines and cortisol remained unaffected. Over the year ECs and NAEs stayed elevated and fluctuated before slowly decreasing till the end of the deployment. The classical stress hormones showed small increases in the last third of deployment.
In contrast, at Concordia (high altitude) norepinephrine concentrations increased significantly at the beginning (p < 0.001) which was paralleled by low EC levels. Prior to the second half of deployment norepinephrine declined constantly to end on a low plateau level whereas then the EC concentrations increased significantly in this second period during the overwintering (p < 0.001). Psychometric data showed no significant changes in the crews at either station.
These findings demonstrate that exposition of healthy humans to the physically challenging extreme environment of Antarctica i) has a distinct modulating effect on stress responses. Additionally, ii) acute high altitude/hypobaric hypoxia at the beginning seem to trigger catecholamine release that downregulates the EC response. These results iii) are not associated with psychological stress.

Keywords: Endoannabinoids, Catecholamines, Glucocorticoids, hypobaric hypoxia, high altitude, Antartica

Received: 12 Aug 2018; Accepted: 31 Oct 2018.

Edited by:

Martin Burtscher, University of Innsbruck, Austria

Reviewed by:

Patricia Siques, Arturo Prat University, Chile
Jesús Álvarez-Herms, Departament d'Ensenyament, Spain  

Copyright: © 2018 Strewe, Thieme, Dangoisse, Fiedel, van den Berg, Bauer, Salam, Gössmann-Lang, Campolongo, Moser, Quintens, Moreels, Baatout, Kohlberg, Schelling, Chouker and Feuerecker. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Prof. Gustav Schelling, Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany, gustav.schelling@med.uni-muenchen.de
Prof. Alexander Chouker, Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany, alexander.chouker@med.uni-muenchen.de