Laura J. A. Hardwick1,2,3
Anna Philpott1,2*- 1Philpott Lab, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- 2Wellcome MRC Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- 3Peterhouse, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
The use of the Xenopus model system has provided diverse contributions to cancer research, not least because of the striking parallels between tumour pathogenesis and early embryo development. Cell cycle regulation, signalling pathways, and cell behaviours such as migration are frequently perturbed in cancers; all have been investigated using Xenopus, and these developmental events can additionally act as an assay for drug development studies. In this mini-review, we focus our discussion primarily on whole embryo Xenopus models informing cancer biology; the contributions to date and future potential. Insights into tumour immunity, oncogene function, and visualisation of vascular responses during tumour formation have all been achieved with naturally occurring tumours and induced-tumour-like-structures in Xenopus. Finally, as we are now entering the era of genetically modified Xenopus models, we can harness genome editing techniques to recapitulate human disease through creating embryos with analogous genetic abnormalities. With the speed, versatility and accessibility that epitomise the Xenopus system, this new range of pre-clinical Xenopus models has great potential to advance our mechanistic understanding of oncogenesis and provide an early in vivo model for chemotherapeutic development.
Introduction
Cancer is a prominent cause of death worldwide and numbers of cases are predicted to increase as populations grow and age (Torre et al., 2016). Oncology research is also expanding in parallel and a wealth of discoveries have provided insight from a social level to intricate details of molecular pathogenesis. These advances would not be possible without the use of research models, but there is increasing pressure to reduce the use of mammalian animals in biomedical research, and there is still a gap for relevant translational models for high-throughput screening for therapeutic development (Naert et al., 2017). The articles in this special issue are testament to the versatility of the Xenopus system, and in keeping, the full repertoire of in vitro biochemistry, oocytes, explants, embryos, and adult frogs have all provided diverse contributions to cancer research, from understanding biological processes that are deranged in cancer to modelling using a new age of genetically engineered transgenic animals. Here, we summarise the breadth of Xenopus’ contribution to cancer research (see also Hardwick and Philpott, 2015), focusing our discussion on the development and application of whole embryos and adult Xenopus frogs as in vivo models informing cancer biology.
Parallels Between Development and Disease
The wide-ranging application of Xenopus to the field of oncology is built on the striking parallels between tumour pathogenesis and early embryo development. The “hallmarks of cancer” are now widely recognised as abnormal and tumorigenic properties (Hanahan and Weinberg, 2000, 2011), yet they often arise from inappropriate re-activation or de-regulation of normal physiological processes, many of which are instrumental to embryogenesis when precisely executed in space and time (Aiello and Stanger, 2016). Considerable literature now documents the similarities between early development and tumorigenesis in terms of gene expression, proteasome, signalling pathways, and cell behaviours (Ma et al., 2010). A greater understanding of the physiological processes in the embryo, both in terms of molecular components and regulatory mechanisms, may therefore give insight into tumour pathogenesis and potential therapeutic targets, as illustrated below.
To summarise the diverse application of the Xenopus system to cancer research, Figure 1 illustrates contributions made to understanding each of the cancer hallmarks. This includes the use of in vitro extract systems, oocytes and developing Xenopus embryos to study fundamental aspects of cell biology such as DNA replication (Blow and Laskey, 2016), genome maintenance (Hoogenboom et al., 2017), DNA damage response (Cupello et al., 2016), cell cycle control (Philpott and Yew, 2008), metabolism (Ureta et al., 2001), and signalling pathways (Hill, 2001; Kuhl, 2002; Smith et al., 2008; Pera et al., 2014). Natural tumour immunity in amphibians has also elucidated immune system interactions (Banach and Robert, 2017), and together with in vitro experiments using extracts (Deming and Kornbluth, 2006), morphogenesis of embryos provides a physiological setting for study of apoptosis (Ishizuya-Oka, 2011; Ito et al., 2012). Similarly, key stromal interactions during tumour growth and metastasis have been informed by intra-vital imaging in Xenopus tadpoles (Haynes-Gimore et al., 2015) and by the study of developmental epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) events (Pegoraro and Monsoro-Burq, 2013) that are key to malignant tumour invasion (Tanaka et al., 2016). Finally, tadpoles and adult frogs contribute to our understanding of genetic influences on tumorigenesis through induced-tumour-like-structures (ITLSs) (Wallingford, 1999) and the use of a new era of genetically engineered Xenopus models (GEXM) (Naert et al., 2017).
FIGURE 1. Using the full Xenopus repertoire to inform on the hallmarks of cancer. Ten hallmarks of cancer are recognised (left) and Xenopus studies have informed on each of these aspects (right) as described in the main text. Where possible review papers are referenced to direct readers to further discussion of each topic. ITLSs, induced-tumour-like-structures; GEXM, genetically engineered Xenopus models.
Increasingly oncologists have harnessed and applied aspects of the developmental biology toolbox, for example utilising lineage tracing technologies to investigate tumour cell origin and evolution (Aiello and Stanger, 2016). Similarly, given that developmental and oncogenic processes often depend on the same underlying pathways, it is perhaps not surprising that embryonic events provide an in vivo assay system for discovery and development of new therapeutics targeting these pathways. For example, aberrant Wnt signalling can contribute to all stages of tumorigenesis with a particularly prominent driving role in intestinal cancers, yet it has proved difficult to target therapeutically (Krishnamurthy and Kurzrock, 2018). Axis duplication can be induced in Xenopus embryos by injection of RNA encoding β-catenin into a ventral cell of a four cell embryo (Kuhl and Pandur, 2008), and preventing this Wnt-dependent secondary axis is a rapid and efficient screen for potential Wnt inhibitors (Waaler et al., 2011; De Robertis et al., 2013). Furthermore, monitoring developmental events such as tadpole blood and lymphatic formation can be used to screen chemical libraries for anti-angiogenic activity (Kalin et al., 2009), and a transgenic Xenopus reporter model now exists with expression of GFP in both blood and lymphatic vasculature under the xFlk1 promoter (Ny et al., 2005, 2013) simplifying such analysis even further. Additionally, gastrulation and neural crest migration critically require transient EMT events, and inhibition of the associated cell movements provides an initial in vivo assay to identify compounds that may also inhibit invasion and proliferation of several types of cancer (Tanaka et al., 2016). The large numbers, accessibility and rapid and robust development of embryos have earned Xenopus worldwide credibility in developmental biology; these same attributes are now valid for novel pharmacological screening approaches and are likely be utilised further in the future (Schmitt et al., 2014).
Naturally Occurring Xenopus Tumours and Anti-Cancer Defences
Naturally occurring tumours in Xenopus are believed to be rare, and potent carcinogens known in mammals have limited ability to induce tumours in amphibians, proving an intriguing insight into mechanisms of relative resistance and/or altered sensitivity to carcinogens. These may include control mechanisms present that regulate adult tissue regeneration, altered self-tolerance post-metamorphosis resulting in cancer cell rejection, ready induction of apoptosis and a reduced sensitivity to DNA damage; reviewed in Ruben et al. (2007). Amphibian skin also secretes a vast array of antibiotic peptides but some of these have inhibitory activity against human cancer cell growth, fuelling interest in defining more of these natural peptide secretions (Li et al., 2016).
Mechanisms of Tumour Immunity
Inflammation and evading the immune system are two hallmarks of cancer (Hanahan and Weinberg, 2011), and immune-based therapy is already employed in both human (Zhang and Chen, 2018) and veterinary cancer patients (Klingemann, 2018). However, a complex array of tumour and immune cell interactions can have disparate effects, leading to the concept of “immune-editing” of a heterogenous mix of tumour clones (Bui and Schreiber, 2007). While some clones may be completely destroyed by the host immune system, selection pressure can create the persistence of clones with anti-immune defences or reduced immunogenicity, promoting tumour growth (Bui and Schreiber, 2007). Components of the innate and adaptive immune systems are highly conserved between Xenopus and mammals; readers are directed to Banach and Robert (2017) for a recent and in-depth review. With the derivation of defined immunogenic Xenopus cancer cell lines (see below), together with in-bred MHC-defined strains of Xenopus that permit tumour grafts without rejection, Xenopus is a highly valuable model for dissecting the roles of various immune system components; comprehensively reviewed in Goyos and Robert (2009); Robert (2010), and Banach and Robert (2017).
Original reports of highly malignant lymphosarcoma in Xenopus were subsequently demonstrated to be an infectious granuloma in response to mycobacterium marinum (Asfari, 1988; Asfari and Thiebaud, 1988), but a range of genuine neoplastic and sometimes metastatic diseases are documented, including hepatoma, teratoma, renal carcinoma, fibrosarcoma, ovarian dysgerminoma, lymphoma, and pancreatic carcinoma (Banach and Robert, 2017). In the 1990s, five thymic lymphomas were reported in genetically different adult frogs, and these have provided five different and now extensively characterised lymphoid cell lines (B3B7, 15/0, 15/40, ff-2, and ff-2.64) (Robert and Cohen, 1998). Features such as high levels of myc expression, aneuploidy and genetic instability indicate their relevance to mammalian cancers, and mixed expression of T and B cell markers indicates resemblance to rare human leukocytic leukaemias (Robert and Cohen, 1998). These different thymic tumour cell lines arise in differing MHC immune backgrounds and display differing behaviours and invasiveness on transplantation, dependent on the immune status of the recipient tadpole or adult (Robert et al., 1994). These transplantation experiments coupled with the ease of genetic manipulation in Xenopus have allowed dissection of the mechanisms behind tumour and immune system interactions, including a key role of adult T cells for defence (Robert et al., 1997), and tumour expression of non-classical MHC class1b molecules for escaping immune recognition (Haynes-Gilmore et al., 2014).
Recent Advances Using Natural Tumour Grafts
Transplantation studies using the aggressive 15/0 tumour cell line and MHC compatible LG6 and LG15 tadpoles have also led to the recent development of a semi-solid tumour model by embedding tumour cells in a collagen matrix prior to subcutaneous engrafting (Haynes-Gimore et al., 2015). By fluorescently labelling tumour cells and infusing intra-cardiac labelled dextran, neoangiogenesis is visualised by intra-vital imaging to reveal a network of convoluted tumour vessels with slow laminar blood flow, recapitulating features of mammalian tumour vasculature. Utilising the natural transparency of Xenopus tadpoles, the semi-solid nature of the graft also enables visualisation of collagen rearrangements and infiltrating melanophores, characterising in real-time the tumour interaction with stroma and immune components (Haynes-Gimore et al., 2015). Just as developmental angiogenesis or neural crest formation can provide an in vivo screen for inhibitory drugs (see above), this accessible and well-characterised tumour model will surely attract further attention for chemotherapeutic development.
Induced Tumour-Like-Structures (Itls) as Early Xenopus Models of Cancer
Whilst there has been limited success in inducing tumours in Xenopus by carcinogens, simple genetic manipulation by RNA injection has been a cornerstone of the Xenopus system to study key developmental proteins, and this approach has also yielded early tumour models allowing characterisation of the role of various oncogenes or tumour suppressor proteins. These cancer models further emphasise the closely entwined features of both development and cancer, with developmental factors having influence on tumorigenesis, and the discovery that known oncogenic proteins may originally have a physiological role in development (Wallingford, 1999).
Developmental Regulators Influencing Oncogenesis
One of the first tumour phenotypes in Xenopus was reported through the study of tumour suppressor protein p53 in normal embryo development (Wallingford et al., 1997). Observations in tissue culture experiments and mouse models have long demonstrated the oncogenic effects of mutant p53, in part arising through a loss of cell cycle control and genomic instability. To investigate its role in embryogenesis and tumorigenesis, researchers turned to Xenopus where the rapid development of embryos allows analysis without the complicating effects of de novo mutations from inherent genomic instability. Human p53 alterations are the most common genetic abnormality in human cancers, often due to dominant-negative effects, and the human protein is biochemically similar to the Xenopus homolog, making Xenopus a relevant oncological model (Wallingford, 1999). Accordingly, targeted over-expression of dominant-negative human p53 in Xenopus embryos inhibits differentiation in multiple germ layers and produces cellular masses of undifferentiated cells with abnormal nuclear morphologies (Wallingford et al., 1997). This essential role of p53 in normal differentiation, beyond its roles in cell cycle control, is now well-documented in aspects of neurogenesis (Hardwick et al., 2014) and supports the notion that certain cancers may arise from a failure of differentiation rather than overt proliferation defects per se; a concept also suggested using a Xenopus developmental model for paediatric cancer Neuroblastoma (Wylie et al., 2015).
Oncogenic Regulators Influencing Development
Oncogenes can often directly influence aspects of cell fate and development. For example, over-expression of the viral oncogene polyoma middle T in Xenopus animal cap explants results in re-specification of prospective ectoderm to mesoderm, suggesting common signal transduction pathways between early inductive signals and oncogenic stimuli (Whitman and Melton, 1989). This is also supported by investigations in Xenopus using dominant inhibitory ras mutants, revealing a role for proto-oncogene p21ras in transduction of FGF and activin signalling in mesoderm induction (Whitman and Melton, 1992). Additionally, the Rel family of transcriptional activators are a diverse group including oncoprotein c-Rel. The Xenopus homolog Xrel3 is a distinct rel protein expressed in two phases of early development, and its over-expression induces tumour formation (Yang et al., 1998). It his highly plausible that a protein with a physiological role in regulating the balance between cell proliferation and differentiation may become subverted and contribute to cancer formation, or alternatively there may be a convergence of oncogenic stimuli on the same developmental signalling pathways.
Characterising Oncogenes With Induced Tumour Models
Consistent with this theme of aberrant use of signalling pathways in oncogenesis, a Xenopus model of human basal cell carcinoma (BCC) has revealed the importance of Gli1 as a target and mediator of sonic hedgehog (Shh) signalling in BCC development. Over-expression of Gli1 in Xenopus embryos results in focal epidermal lesions with marker expression resembling that of human BCC and highlighting Gli1 as a potential early biomarker for diagnosis of BCC (Dahmane et al., 1997). Thus, ITLSs have been produced by over-expression of a range of proteins relevant to human cancers, and these tumours demonstrate disorganised and undifferentiated cells, high mitotic indicies, stromal interactions and neovascularisation (Chernet and Levin, 2013).
These same Xenopus models have also been used to extensively explore membrane depolarisation as a bioelectric marker predictive of ITLS foci (Chernet and Levin, 2013). Transmembrane potential itself may be an oncogenic driver and depolarisation of native neural crest cells can non-cell autonomously induce neoplastic changes in surrounding melanocytes (Blackiston et al., 2011; Lobikin et al., 2012). Similarly, formation of ITLS can be suppressed by hyperpolarisation of tumour or surrounding cells, suggested to be mediated through enhanced tumour uptake of butyrate with HDAC inhibitory properties, resulting in reduced cellular proliferation (Chernet and Levin, 2013, 2014). For further discussion (see Levin et al., 2017; Silver and Nelson, 2018).
Genetically Engineered Xenopus Models (Gexm)
From the preceding discussion, Xenopus models have already assisted with investigation of both cancer pathogenesis and therapeutic development. These models are being expanded to a new dimension by using genome editing technology with TALENs or CRISPR/Cas9; methodology discussed in Naert et al. (2017). Genetically engineered mouse models are well-established in the Oncology toolbox, but aquatic models like zebrafish and Xenopus offer extra-uterine development of large embryos and simple injection set-ups for delivery of targeted nucleases, also usually lacking inherent complications of highly inbred genetic backgrounds (Naert et al., 2017). In addition to rapid development, high embryo number, and detailed fate maps for tissue-specific targeting, Xenopus also presents several advantages over zebrafish, such as reduced evolutionary distance to humans. Moreover, Xenopus tropicalis has a true diploid genome with substantial shared synteny with the human genome; in zebrafish whole genome duplication leads to redundancy and complications identifying human orthologs (Naert et al., 2017).
The first GEXM was established to phenocopy Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) by TALEN-mediated targeting of the apc gene in Xenopus tropicalis, replicating the human frame-shifting mutations and complementing models such as the Apcmin mouse and ENU-induced apc zebrafish mutant (Van Nieuwenhuysen et al., 2015). FAP is an autosomal dominant disease due to truncating mutations of the apc gene, resulting in 100s to 1000s of adenomatous polyps in the colon, potentially progressing to adenocarcinoma and sometimes accompanied by extra-colonic manifestations. Although F0 tadpoles do not develop genuine intestinal adenomas, they do display abnormal histological architecture of the intestine and the lack of adenomas may be explained by the distinct Xenopus intestinal folding pattern that allows proliferating cells to spread rather than form polyps (Van Nieuwenhuysen et al., 2015). Additionally, retinal hyperplasia and external tumours such as subcutaneous desmoid tumours resemble extra-colonic disease reported in humans, each displaying increased Wnt signalling and only mutant apc alleles. Thus, the Xenopus apc model provides high penetrance and rapid and reproducible tumour formation that is comparable to the human disease (Van Nieuwenhuysen et al., 2015).
A second model by the same group used CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of rb1 and rbl1 genes in Xenopus tropicalis to phenocopy Retinoblastoma, a paediatric tumour of the developing retina (Naert et al., 2016). While mouse models exist, they show variable latency to tumour development and rely on conditional deletion as complete knock-out is embryonic lethal, while a zebrafish model relies on orthotopic retinoblastoma transplantation. As in mice, Xenopus tumours require inactivation of both rb1 and rbl1 genes, achieved by co-injection of independent pairs of guide RNAs and editing by CRISPR-Cas9; these mosaic double knock-out tadpoles develop a rapid and penetrant retinoblastoma in as little as 35 days, with histopathology and disease progression conserved with the human tumour (Naert et al., 2016). Efficiency of genome editing is reported at 25–30% for each locus, thus neoplasias develop in F0 mosaic mutants without high genome editing efficiencies, and given that an entire experiment can be conducted within 3 months, this technology using the Xenopus system has huge potential for future application (Naert et al., 2016).
Future Perspectives
Building on the extensive history of Xenopus in exploring fundamental cell and developmental biology, we are now entering a new era where modern genome editing technology is being combined with all the classical attributes of the Xenopus system to generate clinically relevant cancer models that are rapid, penetrant and highly suited to high-throughput screening. This is an important step allowing reduction of the number of mammals in pre-clinical research, and provides a range of platforms for therapeutic development, either using developmental events to screen for drugs targeting the same signalling pathways or as relevant in vivo tumour models. Furthermore, the aquatic nature of Xenopus permits fast and efficient preclinical screening of water-soluble compounds (Naert et al., 2017). There is also potential for characterising disease modifying genes by multiplexed biallelic targeting in Xenopus and proof of principle is already shown for dual target genes with TALENs (Naert et al., 2017) and triplex gene editing with CRISPR (Naert et al., 2016). Next steps will involve deletion of large chromosomal regions or replicating chromosomal translocations and relocations (Naert et al., 2017). Thus, Xenopus has rightfully earned a place in the Oncologist’s toolbox and is likely to achieve even more prominence as the unique advantages of the Xenopus system become widely acknowledged in the oncology field.
Author Contributions
LH wrote the manuscript and prepared the figure. AP reviewed and edited the manuscript.
Funding
Work in AP’s lab was supported by a project grant from Neuroblastoma UK and by core support from the Wellcome Trust and MRC Cambridge Stem Cell. LH was supported by a Peterhouse Research Fellowship.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
Aiello, N. M., and Stanger, B. Z. (2016). Echoes of the embryo: using the developmental biology toolkit to study cancer. Dis. Models Mech. 9, 105–114. doi: 10.1242/dmm.023184
Asfari, M. (1988). Mycobacterium-induced infectious granuloma in Xenopus: histopathology and transmissibility. Cancer Res. 48, 958–963.
Asfari, M., and Thiebaud, C. H. (1988). Transplantation studies of a putative lymphosarcoma of Xenopus. Cancer Res. 48, 954–957.
Banach, M., and Robert, J. (2017). Tumor immunology viewed from alternative animal models-the Xenopus story. Curr. Pathobiol. Rep. 5, 49–56. doi: 10.1007/s40139-017-0125-y
Blackiston, D., Adams, D. S., Lemire, J. M., Lobikin, M., and Levin, M. (2011). Transmembrane potential of GlyCl-expressing instructor cells induces a neoplastic-like conversion of melanocytes via a serotonergic pathway. Dis. Models Mech. 4, 67–85. doi: 10.1242/dmm.005561
Blow, J. J., and Laskey, R. A. (2016). Xenopus cell-free extracts and their contribution to the study of DNA replication and other complex biological processes. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 60, 201–207. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.160142jb
Bui, J. D., and Schreiber, R. D. (2007). Cancer immunosurveillance, immunoediting and inflammation: independent or interdependent processes? Curr. Opin. Immunol. 19, 203–208. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2007.02.001
Chernet, B. T., and Levin, M. (2013). Transmembrane voltage potential is an essential cellular parameter for the detection and control of tumor development in a Xenopus model. Dis. Models Mech. 6, 595–607. doi: 10.1242/dmm.010835
Chernet, B. T., and Levin, M. (2014). Transmembrane voltage potential of somatic cells controls oncogene-mediated tumorigenesis at long-range. Oncotarget 5, 3287–3306. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.1935
Cupello, S., Richardson, C., and Yan, S. (2016). Cell-free Xenopus egg extracts for studying DNA damage response pathways. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 60, 229–236. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.160113sy
Dahmane, N., Lee, J., Robins, P., Heller, P., and Ruiz i Altaba, A. (1997). Activation of the transcription factor Gli1 and the Sonic hedgehog signalling pathway in skin tumours. Nature 389, 876–881. doi: 10.1038/39918
De Robertis, A., Valensin, S., Rossi, M., Tunici, P., Verani, M., De Rosa, A., et al. (2013). Identification and characterization of a small-molecule inhibitor of Wnt signaling in glioblastoma cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 12, 1180–1189. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-12-1176-t
Deming, P., and Kornbluth, S. (2006). Study of apoptosis in vitro using the Xenopus egg extract reconstitution system. Methods Mol. Biol. 322, 379–393. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-000-3_27
Goyos, A., and Robert, J. (2009). Tumorigenesis and anti-tumor immune responses in Xenopus. Front. Biosci. 14, 167–176. doi: 10.2741/3238
Hanahan, D., and Weinberg, R. A. (2000). The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100, 57–70. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81683-9
Hanahan, D., and Weinberg, R. A. (2011). Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144, 646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013
Hardwick, L. J., Ali, F. R., Azzarelli, R., and Philpott, A. (2014). Cell cycle regulation of proliferation versus differentiation in the central nervous system. Cell Tissue Res. 359, 187–200. doi: 10.1007/s00441-014-1895-8
Hardwick, L. J., and Philpott, A. (2015). An oncologists friend: how Xenopus contributes to cancer research. Dev. Biol. 408, 180–187. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.02.003
Haynes-Gilmore, N., Banach, M., Edholm, E. S., Lord, E., and Robert, J. (2014). A critical role of non-classical MHC in tumor immune evasion in the amphibian Xenopus model. Carcinogenesis 35, 1807–1813. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgu100
Haynes-Gimore, N., Banach, M., Brown, E., Dawes, R., Edholm, E. S., Kim, M., et al. (2015). Semi-solid tumor model in Xenopus laevis/gilli cloned tadpoles for intravital study of neovascularization, immune cells and melanophore infiltration. Dev. Biol. 408, 205–212. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.01.003
Hill, C. S. (2001). TGF-beta signalling pathways in early Xenopus development. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 11, 533–540. doi: 10.1016/S0959-437X(00)00229-X
Hoogenboom, W. S., Klein Douwel, D., and Knipscheer, P. (2017). Xenopus egg extract: a powerful tool to study genome maintenance mechanisms. Dev. Biol. 428, 300–309. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.03.033
Ishizuya-Oka, A. (2011). Amphibian organ remodeling during metamorphosis: insight into thyroid hormone-induced apoptosis. Dev. Growth Differ. 53, 202–212. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-169X.2010.01222.x
Ito, M., Tamura, K., Mawaribuchi, S., and Takamatsu, N. (2012). Apoptotic and survival signaling mediated through death receptor members during metamorphosis in the African clawed frog Xenopus laevis. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 176, 461–464. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2011.12.037
Kalin, R. E., Banziger-Tobler, N. E., Detmar, M., and Brandli, A. W. (2009). An in vivo chemical library screen in Xenopus tadpoles reveals novel pathways involved in angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Blood 114, 1110–1122. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-211771
Klingemann, H. (2018). Immunotherapy for dogs: running behind humans. Front. Immunol. 9:133. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00133
Krishnamurthy, N., and Kurzrock, R. (2018). Targeting the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway in cancer: update on effectors and inhibitors. Cancer Treat. Rev. 62, 50–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.11.002
Kuhl, M. (2002). Non-canonical Wnt signaling in Xenopus: regulation of axis formation and gastrulation. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 13, 243–249. doi: 10.1016/S1084-9521(02)00050-2
Kuhl, M., and Pandur, P. (2008). Dorsal axis duplication as a functional readout for Wnt activity. Methods Mol. Biol. 469, 467–476. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-469-29
Levin, M., Pezzulo, G., and Finkelstein, J. M. (2017). Endogenous bioelectric signaling networks: exploiting voltage gradients for control of growth and form. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 19, 353–387. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071114-040647
Li, S., Hao, L., Bao, W., Zhang, P., Su, D., Cheng, Y., et al. (2016). A novel short anionic antibacterial peptide isolated from the skin of Xenopus laevis with broad antibacterial activity and inhibitory activity against breast cancer cell. Arch. Microbiol. 198, 473–482. doi: 10.1007/s00203-016-1206-8
Lobikin, M., Chernet, B., Lobo, D., and Levin, M. (2012). Resting potential, oncogene-induced tumorigenesis, and metastasis: the bioelectric basis of cancer in vivo. Phys. Biol. 9:065002. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/9/6/065002
Ma, Y., Zhang, P., Wang, F., Yang, J., Yang, Z., and Qin, H. (2010). The relationship between early embryo development and tumourigenesis. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 14, 2697–2701. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01191.x
Naert, T., Colpaert, R., Van Nieuwenhuysen, T., Dimitrakopoulou, D., Leoen, J., Haustraete, J., et al. (2016). CRISPR/Cas9 mediated knockout of rb1 and rbl1 leads to rapid and penetrant retinoblastoma development in Xenopus tropicalis. Sci. Rep. 6:35264. doi: 10.1038/srep35264
Naert, T., Van Nieuwenhuysen, T., and Vleminckx, K. (2017). TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9 fuel genetically engineered clinically relevant Xenopus tropicalis tumor models. Genesis 55:e23005. doi: 10.1002/dvg.23005
Ny, A., Koch, M., Schneider, M., Neven, E., Tong, R. T., Maity, S., et al. (2005). A genetic Xenopus laevis tadpole model to study lymphangiogenesis. Nat. Med. 11, 998–1004. doi: 10.1038/nm1285
Ny, A., Vandevelde, W., Hohensinner, P., Beerens, M., Geudens, I., Diez-Juan, A., et al. (2013). A transgenic Xenopus laevis reporter model to study lymphangiogenesis. Biol. Open 2, 882–890. doi: 10.1242/bio.20134739
Pegoraro, C., and Monsoro-Burq, A. H. (2013). Signaling and transcriptional regulation in neural crest specification and migration: lessons from xenopus embryos. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 2, 247–259. doi: 10.1002/wdev.76
Pera, E. M., Acosta, H., Gouignard, N., Climent, M., and Arregi, I. (2014). Active signals, gradient formation and regional specificity in neural induction. Exp. Cell Res. 321, 25–31. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.11.018
Philpott, A., and Yew, P. R. (2008). The Xenopus cell cycle: an overview. Mol. Biotechnol. 39, 9–19. doi: 10.1007/s12033-008-9033-z
Robert, J. (2010). Comparative study of tumorigenesis and tumor immunity in invertebrates and nonmammalian vertebrates. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 34, 915–925. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2010.05.011
Robert, J., and Cohen, N. (1998). Evolution of immune surveillance and tumor immunity: studies in Xenopus. Immunol. Rev. 166, 231–243. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.1998.tb01266.x
Robert, J., Guiet, C., Cohen, N., and Du Pasquier, L. (1997). Effects of thymectomy and tolerance induction on tumor immunity in adult Xenopus laevis. Int. J. Cancer 70, 330–334. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19970127)70:3<330::AID-IJC14>3.0.CO;2-J
Robert, J., Guiet, C., and Du Pasquier, L. (1994). Lymphoid tumors of Xenopus laevis with different capacities for growth in larvae and adults. Dev. Immunol. 3, 297–307. doi: 10.1155/1994/37392
Ruben, L. N., Clothier, R. H., and Balls, M. (2007). Cancer resistance in amphibians. Altern. Lab. Anim. 35, 463–470.
Schmitt, S. M., Gull, M., and Brandli, A. W. (2014). Engineering Xenopus embryos for phenotypic drug discovery screening. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 6, 225–246. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.02.004
Silver, B. B., and Nelson, C. M. (2018). The bioelectric code: reprogramming cancer and aging from the interface of mechanical and chemical microenvironments. Front. Cell. Dev. Biol. 6:21. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2018.00021
Smith, J. C., Hagemann, A., Saka, Y., and Williams, P. H. (2008). Understanding how morphogens work. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 363, 1387–1392. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2256
Tanaka, M., Kuriyama, S., Itoh, G., Kohyama, A., Iwabuchi, Y., Shibata, H., et al. (2016). Identification of anti-cancer chemical compounds using Xenopus embryos. Cancer Sci. 107, 803–811. doi: 10.1111/cas.12940
Torre, L. A., Siegel, R. L., Ward, E. M., and Jemal, A. (2016). Global cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends–an update. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 25, 16–27. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-15-0578
Ureta, T., Preller, A., and Kessi, E. (2001). Frog oocytes: a living test tube for studies on metabolic regulation. IUBMB Life 51, 5–10. doi: 10.1080/15216540117404
Van Nieuwenhuysen, T., Naert, T., Tran, H. T., Van Imschoot, G., Geurs, S., Sanders, E., et al. (2015). TALEN-mediated apc mutation in Xenopus tropicalis phenocopies familial adenomatous polyposis. Oncoscience 2, 555–566. doi: 10.18632/oncoscience.166
Waaler, J., Machon, O., von Kries, J. P., Wilson, S. R., Lundenes, E., Wedlich, D., et al. (2011). Novel synthetic antagonists of canonical Wnt signaling inhibit colorectal cancer cell growth. Cancer Res. 71, 197–205. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1282
Wallingford, J. B. (1999). Tumors in tadpoles: the Xenopus embryo as a model system for the study of tumorigenesis. Trends Genet. 15, 385–388. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9525(99)01800-4
Wallingford, J. B., Seufert, D. W., Virta, V. C., and Vize, P. D. (1997). p53 activity is essential for normal development in Xenopus. Curr. Biol. 7, 747–757. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00333-2
Whitman, M., and Melton, D. A. (1989). Induction of mesoderm by a viral oncogene in early Xenopus embryos. Science 244, 803–806. doi: 10.1126/science.2658054
Whitman, M., and Melton, D. A. (1992). Involvement of p21ras in Xenopus mesoderm induction. Nature 357, 252–254. doi: 10.1038/357252a0
Wylie, L. A., Hardwick, L. J., Papkovskaia, T. D., Thiele, C. J., and Philpott, A. (2015). Ascl1 phospho-status regulates neuronal differentiation in a Xenopus developmental model of neuroblastoma. Dis. Models Mech. 8, 429–441. doi: 10.1242/dmm.018630
Yang, S., Lockwood, A., Hollett, P., Ford, R., and Kao, K. (1998). Overexpression of a novel Xenopus Rel mRNA gene induces tumors in early embryos. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 13746–13752. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.22.13746
Keywords: Xenopus, cancer, tumour, oncogene, transgenic
Citation: Hardwick LJA and Philpott A (2018) Xenopus Models of Cancer: Expanding the Oncologist’s Toolbox. Front. Physiol. 9:1660. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01660
Received: 12 September 2018; Accepted: 02 November 2018;
Published: 27 November 2018.
Edited by:
Karen Liu, King’s College London, United KingdomReviewed by:
Amy Katherine Sater, University of Houston, United StatesJacques Robert, University of Rochester, United States
Copyright © 2018 Hardwick and Philpott. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Anna Philpott, ap113@cam.ac.uk