Chemical Equilibrium at the Tick–Host Feeding Interface:A Critical Examination of Biological Relevance in Hematophagous Behavior

Abstract

Ticks secrete hundreds to thousands of proteins into the feeding site, that presumably all play important functions in the modulation of host defense mechanisms. The current review considers the assumption that tick proteins have functional relevance during feeding. The feeding site may be described as a closed system and could be treated as an ideal equilibrium system, thereby allowing modeling of tick–host interactions in an equilibrium state. In this equilibrium state, the concentration of host and tick proteins and their affinities will determine functional relevance at the tick–host interface. Using this approach, many characterized tick proteins may have functional relevant concentrations and affinities at the feeding site. Conversely, the feeding site is not an ideal closed system, but is dynamic and changing, leading to possible overestimation of tick protein concentration at the feeding site and consequently an overestimation of functional relevance. Ticks have evolved different possible strategies to deal with this dynamic environment and overcome the barrier that equilibrium kinetics poses to tick feeding. Even so, cognisance of the limitations that equilibrium binding place on deductions of functional relevance should serve as an important incentive to determine both the concentration and affinity of tick proteins proposed to be functional at the feeding site.

Biological Activity at the Tick Feeding Interface

Biological function is central to the understanding of life and organismal biology. The context that function confers is exemplified in the frustration felt when a gene or protein of interest can only be annotated as a hypothetical protein with unknown function. Conversely, the ease of annotation by homology has made genome sequencing and assignment of function to orthologs an almost mundane task (Giles and Emes, 2017). Even so, biochemical characterization remains central to the elucidation and confirmation of new function and the understanding of functional mechanism. From a biochemical reductionist perspective, biological function may be explained within a structural mechanistic context as the action of a gene, surface, motif or residue that result in a chemical reaction, activation or inhibition of an enzyme or receptor, or even a physiological process such as blood clotting or platelet aggregation. The current review considers biological function at the tick–host interface from this reductionist perspective (Elgin, 2010). Even so, it was recently suggested that before or during evolution of new function by gene duplicates, and before negative selection maintain the adaptive advantage conferred by such new functions, new duplicates may exist in a state of undefined or non-optimized function, where protein expression is maintained while functional space is explored by random mutation: the playground hypothesis of neutral evolution (Mans et al., 2017). There is also an increasing recognition that most proteins may exhibit “promiscuous activity,” i.e., irrelevant secondary activities (Copley, 2015, 2017). In addition, given the possibility that a biochemical assay may yield results for a broad class of proteins with diverse functions, or even results without biological meaning, it raise the question whether any particular measured function is relevant within a biological or physiological context. The current review therefore also considers functional relevance at the tick–host interface from this perspective.

Sabbatani (1899), after reading Haycraft’s work on the anti-clotting effects of the oral secretions from leeches (Haycraft, 1884), made the first prescient deduction that all hematophagous organisms must secrete components that interfere or regulate host defenses, such as the hemostatic system. He tested this by showing that crude whole body tick extracts led to in vitro inhibition of blood clotting and that injecting this extract into various animals led to prolongation of blood coagulation in vivo. He also injected what may very well be the first fractionation of tick proteins to show that this purified preparation retained its inhibitory properties. Sabbatani’s deduction has been confirmed by extensive research into tick–host interactions that established a veritable pharmacopeia of bioactive components secreted by ticks during feeding (reviewed in Mans and Neitz, 2004a; Francischetti et al., 2009; Mans et al., 2016). However, a question that must have plagued him and remains relevant today, is whether in vitro and even in vivo observations can be causally linked with biological relevant activity at the feeding site, i.e., do what we measure in a test tube really function as a modulator of host defenses during feeding? The observation that ticks can cause paralysis in a host (Hovell, 1824 cited in Scott, 1921) and the presence of salivary glands in ticks (von Siebold and Stannius, 1854; Leydig, 1855; Heller, 1858), must have suggested that ticks can secrete substances into the host. Phenotypic changes in the host such as itching or ecchymosis after tick bite also suggested that ticks secrete substances into the host (Nuttall et al., 1908). Secretion and therefore presence would imply activity at the feeding site. However, the presence of toxic and anti-hemostatic molecules in tick eggs, but not salivary glands or saliva, showed that measurement of biological activity in crude extracts does not necessarily imply function at the tick–host interface (Hoeppli and Feng, 1933; de Meillon, 1942; Riek, 1957, 1959; Gregson, 1973; Neitz et al., 1981; Viljoen et al., 1985; Mans et al., 2004a). This implication was recognized soon after Sabbatani’s seminal study, when researchers extended his observations by proving that anti-hemostatic and toxic activities were present in salivary glands of ticks (Nuttall and Strickland, 1908; Cornwall and Patton, 1914; Ross, 1926; Hoeppli and Feng, 1933). It would take a number of years before anti-hemostatic and toxic activity could be showed to be secreted in tick saliva itself. This had to await chemical means, such as pilocarpine, or mechanical means, such as infra-red light, to stimulate salivation in order to obtain adequate quantities of salivary secretion for demonstration of biological activity (Howell, 1966; Tatchell, 1967; Neitz et al., 1969, 1978; Dickinson et al., 1976; Ribeiro et al., 1985, 1987; Ribeiro and Spielman, 1986; Ribeiro et al., 1991). However, as Tatchell (1967) indicated: salivary secretions obtained with exogenous stimulants should be treated with caution, since it is unclear whether such secretions represent the total saliva complement or even represent saliva, since cement is not found in such secretions. This may be a pertinent observation since cement may readily form during feeding on artificial membranes (Kröber and Geurin, 2007), arguing that induced salivation is not entirely the same as salivation during actual feeding.

Confirmation of secretion during feeding remains a crucial component of validation of biological relevance (Law et al., 1992). This may be achieved to various extents, by direct determination of the presence of a specific activity or molecule in saliva, or detection of host-derived antibodies generated against components secreted during feeding (Ribeiro et al., 1991; Oleaga-Pérez et al., 1994; Mulenga et al., 2003). Detection in the salivary glands or salivary gland extract (SGE) may be used as an indication of secretion, especially if a secretory peptide signal is present in the immature protein sequence (Nielsen, 2017). The latter have been extensively used to identify potential secretory components during transcriptome analysis (reviewed in Mans et al., 2016). However, secretion of some proteins without canonical signal peptides and non-salivary gland derived proteins via apocrine or alternative secretion has complicated the distinction of true and false positive secretory components (Mulenga et al., 2003; Díaz-Martín et al., 2013b; Oliveira et al., 2013; Tirloni et al., 2014, 2015), thereby also obscuring deduction of biological relevance (Mans et al., 2016). Not all salivary gland proteins with signal peptides are necessarily secreted during feeding (Nielsen, 2017), nor are all secretory proteins secreted at the same time, such as the case for hard ticks, that show differential expression over the course of several days of feeding (McSwain et al., 1982; Paesen et al., 1999; Wang et al., 2001b; de Castro et al., 2016, 2017; Kim et al., 2017; Perner et al., 2018). Transcriptome and proteome data also shows a weak correlation (Schwarz et al., 2014). While this may be ascribed to technical limitations in the proteomic and transcriptomic analysis of complex samples from non-model organisms, it further complicates the assessment of the final relevant concentration of protein present during feeding.

The Equilibrium State and Functional Correlates

Le Chatelier’s principle states that an equilibrium system will tend to counteract changes to the system to maintain its equilibrium. In biological systems this is overcome by enzymes that create intermediate states to catalyze non-reversible chemical reactions. In the case of receptor-ligand or protein-inhibitor binding, the affinity of the receptor for the ligand and the relative receptor and ligand concentrations determines the bound state at equilibrium (Figure 1). The affinity between molecules is expressed as the equilibrium dissociation constant (K_D) that range for most biological systems from the fM to mM range (Smith et al., 2012). The K_D is the ligand concentration at which 50% of the receptor is occupied at equilibrium (Figure 1). At a ligand concentration 10-fold the K_D, a receptor would be 91% saturated and above this concentration almost all of the receptor will be occupied. However, at a ligand concentration 10-fold less than the K_D, only 9% of the receptor would be occupied by the ligand and below this concentration essentially no binding occurs. At concentrations of the ligand that is equal to its K_D, only 50% of the receptor will be occupied if the stoichiometry of binding is 1:1. The K_D is therefore also considered to reflect a physiological relevant concentration (Sears et al., 2007). Concentrations of salivary proteins at the feeding site would therefore be physiologically relevant only at concentrations equal or exceeding their affinities for their targets by 10-fold or more if 50–100% receptor occupancy is necessary for effective inhibition. The K_i (inhibitor constant) is determined for inhibitors of enzyme active sites and reflect the concentration necessary to reduce enzyme activity by half. It is generally used in the characterization of inhibitors using enzyme kinetics and depends on both enzyme affinity for substrate and inhibitor affinity for enzyme. Even so, it is similar to the K_D and should produce similar values when enzyme activity is measured at physiological concentrations. Another measurement analogous to the K_D is the IC₅₀ value of an inhibitor. The IC₅₀ value (half-maximal inhibitory concentration) is the concentration at which 50% inhibition of function is observed. This is generally determined for complex processes such as inhibition of platelet aggregation, blood clotting, or cell migration. This value would ultimately depend on the concentration of receptor or number of cells used in an assay, but would be close to the K_D if physiologically relevant receptor or cell concentrations were used. Another measure that may indicate physiological relevance is the stoichiometric inhibition ratio (SI). This ratio indicate physiological relevance when an inhibitor interact with an enzyme or receptor close to equimolar ratios, since this imply high affinity, so that for example an SI = 2 imply saturation of receptor at 2K_D. This may be seen for suicide inhibitors that bind irreversible to the enzyme active site. In enzyme kinetics the K_m (Michaelis constant) is the substrate concentration that allows an enzyme to attain half V_max. V_max is the maximum reaction rate of the enzyme when saturated with substrate. While the K_m is dependent on rate constants rather than ligand concentration it is also an indication of affinity and provide an estimate of relevant concentrations of substrates where an enzyme will function. For example, if a given agonist functions at concentrations 10-fold lower than the K_m, the enzyme will not be able to effectively remove this agonist from the system and neutralize its effect. The K_D, K_i, IC₅₀, SI, and K_m are therefore all useful to assess the physiological relevance of any biological activity. The reader is referred to Kuriyan et al. (2013) for a general treatment of protein-ligand affinity.

FIGURE 1

Another measure of potential functional activity is the amount of salivary gland equivalents that may have a measurable impact or functionality. For example, ∼0.125 salivary gland equivalents from the tick Ornithodoros kalahariensis (previously Ornithodoros savignyi, Bakkes et al., 2018), was able to increase clotting time for the APTT test by 400%, 0.4% of a salivary gland could inhibit fXa ∼100 and 0.07% could inhibit thrombin by ∼100% (Gaspar et al., 1995). As such, any function that may be measured from the equivalent of 2 salivary glands (∼1 tick) or less that has an appreciable effect on some function may indicate the presence of relevant functionality. Even so, if characterizing crude extracts, it should be considered that the sum of multiple functions may be measured and that individual activities may be much less.

Whether a molecule will have relevant biological activity at the feeding site depends on their affinities for their respective ligands or receptors and whether they are secreted at relevant biological concentrations. In terms of chemical equilibrium, this implies that inhibitors or kratagonists (dealt with below) needs to be present at the feeding site at higher concentrations than the K_D for their respective receptors or ligands. At concentrations below the K_D little or no binding will occur and inhibitors may not be effective or physiologically relevant. In addition to satisfying concentration requirements, competition between host-derived substrates, ligands or receptors and tick-derived inhibitors, enzymes or scavengers for activating biomolecules will determine whether potential host-modulatory molecules may be biologically significant. This is essentially determined by the comparative affinities of host vs. tick-derived receptor-ligand interaction. Again, the biological relevance of host-derived agonists will be determined by their active concentrations at the feeding site. Effective concentration may also be determined by protein turnover or half-life at the feeding site. This will depend on secretion into the feeding site, concentration and sequestration at the feeding site and protein stability. In the case of secretory proteins, most have disulphide bonds that increase their stability (Mans et al., 2016), contributing toward their effective concentrations. Modulation of host defenses at the tick–host interface therefore depends on interplay between these factors, with the implication that tick-derived antagonists need to be present at higher concentrations than host-derived agonists and have higher affinities for their shared targets (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2

The Feeding Site: Effective Volume Determines Functionality

The equilibrium state is an ideal closed state and the feeding site may be considered as such. However, while the feeding site may have a defined volume approximating a closed state, the feeding site itself may be dynamic with constant changes in concentration of both host and tick proteins. Ticks ingests blood meal and salivary components, since ticks alternately salivate and ingest blood meal (Arthur, 1970; Kemp et al., 1982), thereby removing both volume and active components from the feeding site. These repetitive doses of saliva, alternating by sucking events may be considered to be independent equilibrium events and in such a case may suggest that estimates of concentration at the feeding site may be lower than described below. Tick-derived molecules may also be removed into the general systemic system of the host or the general area around the feeding site, as evidenced by the systemic effects seen during paralysis and tick toxicoses (Mans et al., 2004a). Influx of blood or lymph into the feeding site may also dilute tick-derived proteins as seen in the case of edema (Kemp et al., 1982). As such, while the feeding site itself has been described as a hematoma or cavity that seems self-contained, the site itself may be much more dynamic than a defined cavity of blood.

A critical question remains as to what extent the feeding site may be reduced to a biochemical reaction in a test tube, i.e., can we measure the feeding site, calculate the feeding site volume and determine the amount of saliva secreted by the tick to derive estimations of biological concentrations at the feeding site? However, the feeding site is a complex and dynamic environment that changes constantly as determined by both the tick and the host (Nuttall, 2019). For example, ticks secrete enzymes that degrade the extracellular matrix over time, increasing the feeding site volume, while host wound healing responses will tend to counteract an increase in feeding site volume (Wikel, 2017). On the other hand, host inflammatory responses such as edema and cellular infiltration will tend to increase the feeding site volume, while hard ticks actively secrete excess blood-meal derived water back into the host, which will further contribute to feeding site volume, dilution and drainage of salivary proteins. As such, feeding site volumes have been conservatively estimated at 10–50 μl (Mans et al., 2008a,b). However, feeding site volume differs between larvae, nymphs and adults, whether natural or secondary hosts are parasitized and whether hosts are naïve or immune (Tatchell and Moorhouse, 1968; Brown and Knapp, 1980a,b; Brown et al., 1983). Natural hosts tend to present smaller feeding lesions, while secondary hosts can produce large lesions due to inflammatory responses (Brown and Knapp, 1980a,b; Brown et al., 1983).

Protein Concentration at the Feeding Site and Functionally Suspect Proteins

It may be estimated what concentrations can be expected for the average secreted protein at the feeding site, by asking what the highest protein concentration may be. In this regard, the lipocalins are known to be some of the most abundant proteins synthesized in tick salivary glands (Mans, 2011; Mans et al., 2017). The TSGP1-4 lipocalins from the soft tick O. kalahariensis has been characterized in detail. They each make up ∼5% of the total soluble salivary gland protein, comprising ∼20% of the total soluble protein content (Mans et al., 2001; Mans and Neitz, 2004b). In this case the total protein that may be secreted by a tick during a feeding event comprise ∼6 μg protein with molecular masses of ∼15 kDa each. Similarly, the savignygrins (Mr ∼ 7 kDa) also make up ∼3% of the total salivary gland protein with ∼4 μg of protein secreted during a feeding event (Mans et al., 2002b). In the case of the lipocalins from the soft ticks Argas monolakensis, the histamine binding protein AM-10 (Mr ∼ 16 kDa) comprise ∼23% of the total soluble protein (Mans et al., 2008b,c), and in this case equates with 4.6 μg of protein secreted during feeding. These concentrations are likely to be the highest estimates, since it is known that hard ticks secrete ∼30–300 times less protein than soft ticks in their saliva at any given feeding stage (Ribeiro, 1987; Dharampaul et al., 1993). The upper limit for any given protein in the adult tick salivary gland may thus be assumed to be ∼10 μg with a dynamic protein concentration range of 10,000-fold (1 ng–10 μg). If it is also assumed that nymphs have 10-fold and larvae 100-fold lower salivary concentrations than adults some interesting observations may be made regarding feeding site concentrations. For the purpose of the current study, the feeding site volumes were estimated from the studies of Brown and Knapp (1980a,b) with feeding cavities for larvae from 0.1 to 50 nl, nymphs from 5 to 150 nl, and adults from 10 nl to 10 μl. Using these assumptions concentration fluctuation at the feeding site can be estimated at various salivary gland protein concentrations and molecular masses of proteins. Under these assumptions the concentrations at the feeding site do not differ extensively between larvae, nymphs or adults, even though feeding site volume and effective salivary gland concentrations may differ (Figure 3). Allowing for the concentration ranges estimated, maximum concentrations at the feeding site may range from nM to mM, and may even range from nM to μM for salivary gland concentrations such as 0.1, 0.01, or 0.001 μg for adults, nymphs, or larvae, respectively, that may be considered to be more representative of the average protein concentration. These concentrations may be an over estimation since the dynamic nature of the feeding site and the rate at which protein is secreted may never approximate these total estimated concentrations.

FIGURE 3

In ticks the IC₅₀, K_D, and K_i values range from pM–mM and falls within the concentration expected at the feeding site (Figure 3, 4). IC₅₀ values generally tend to range from 10 nM to 10 μM (Figure 2). Conversely, K_D values range from 1 nM to 1 μM, while K_i values range from 10 pM to 10 nM. The higher IC₅₀ values is probably due to the use of in vitro assays that measure complex reactions such as platelet aggregation, blood clotting, complement or cell migration. These systems do not necessarily represent true in vivo conditions and may be artificial to some extent, i.e., much higher concentrations of agonists or cell numbers are needed for observation than what is found under physiological conditions. The K_D values may represent true affinities, while the K_i values are dependent on the enzyme and substrate concentrations used, and the lower pM values may be due to the availability of chromogenic and fluorogenic substrates that enable sensitive measurement of enzyme activity. In this case, some of the affinities may be overestimated.

FIGURE 4

A number of tick proteins characterized have affinities, inhibition constants or IC₅₀ values in the nM or pM range, which would probably be functional at the feeding site (Figure 4 and Table 1). For some, concentrations at the feeding site may be estimated based on yields of purified inhibitor and these are generally in the same range as the affinities or higher, suggesting biological relevant concentrations at the feeding site (Table 1). For a number of proteins, estimates of concentrations at the feeding site is not available and the low nM to pM range of their K_D, K_i, or IC₅₀ values is the only indication of functional relevance. A number of proteins also present extraordinary high concentration estimates at the feeding sites (>1 M), which may indicate that these proteins may not have been completely purified at the time of their characterization, or may reflect that they derived from whole body extracts and not tick salivary glands, which may suggest that these inhibitors originate from multiple organs (Ibrahim et al., 2001a,b). In many cases, the concentration of inhibitors that may occur at the feeding site has not been determined (Table 1). This will remain a major impediment in the assessment of functional relevance at the feeding site, since we are probably over rather than underestimating feeding site concentrations. To further consider functional relevance it is necessary to unpack the salivary gland repertoire into its functional modalities.

Tick Feeding and Modulation of Host Defenses

Ticks need to modulate their vertebrate host’s defense mechanisms to obtain a successful blood-meal (Francischetti et al., 2009). In this regard, ticks secrete numerous proteins during feeding that function as inhibitors, enzymes, or kratagonists that use a variety of mechanisms to overcome host defenses (Mans, 2011; Mans et al., 2016) (Figure 5).

FIGURE 5

Inhibitors That Target Enzyme Active Sites and/or Substrate-Binding Exosites

Various enzymes are involved in host hemostasis and many are part of enzyme cascades such as the blood clotting or complement cascade that enable efficient control as well as rapid response to injury or infection (Francischetti et al., 2009). Inhibitors for these cascades are found in all ticks. Inhibitors of blood-clotting enzymes generally target the active and exosites and inhibit primary enzymatic activity of thrombin, fXa, kallikrein, kallikrein-fXIIa–fXIa, fXa-TF-VIIa, plasmin, fV or carboxypeptidase B, thereby inhibiting formation or dissolution of the fibrin clot (Table 1 including references). Inhibitors may also target enzymes that may induce platelet aggregation such as cathepsin G, or enzymes involved in inflammation such as cathepsin B, C, H, L, S, and V, chymase, elastase, and tryptase (Table 1 and references therein). Targeting of enzyme active sites or substrate-binding exosites prevent binding of the substrate to the enzyme, thereby blocking its downstream effects. Most of these inhibitors have affinity measurements ranging from low pM to nM and for those whose concentrations could be estimated, would be present at relevant concentrations (Table 1).

With regard to host protein concentrations and affinities, prothrombin occurs at ~1.4 μM in plasma, although only sub μM quantities are generally converted to thrombin (Butenas and Mann, 2002). Fibrinogen and fibrin has a low affinity site for thrombin with K_D ~ 2–5 μM and a high affinity site with K_D ~ 100 nM, while occurring at a plasma concentration of ~7.6 μM. In addition, the K_D for the thrombin platelet receptor GP1bα is ~50–200 nM (Adams and Huntington, 2006). It is therefore not unexpected that inhibitors would have K_D values in the low nM or pM range, while also occurring at low nM to μM concentration ranges to allow efficient competition with fibrinogen. fX occur at a plasma concentration of ~170 nM, while fXa concentrations found in the clot range from 2 to 16 nM (Butenas and Mann, 2002). These concentrations also correlate with K_i values of tick inhibitors that are in the low nM range or below (Table 1). Other blood clotting factors have even lower concentrations ranging from low nM to pM concentrations in plasma (Butenas and Mann, 2002). Neutrophil derived proteases such as elastase or cathepsin G can reach concentrations of 100 nM at the site of release and is sufficient to induce platelet aggregation (Ferrer-Lopez et al., 1990). Again, the low nM IC₅₀ or K_D values for the tick inhibitors correspond with the host target concentrations, supporting functional relevance at the tick feeding site (Table 1). Some clotting enzyme inhibitors have K_i or IC₅₀ values in the μM ranges (Table 1). While estimates indicate that tick proteins may achieve such high concentrations at the feeding site, it remains crucial to confirm that they actually do.

Inhibitors That Target Sites Distant From Enzyme Active Sites

Inhibitors may target enzymes at sites distant from the active site, thereby disrupting complex assembly and downstream activation and include inhibitors of C5 complement such as Ornithodoros moubata complement inhibitor (OMCI) and Rhipicephalus appendiculatus complement inhibitor (RaCI) (Nunn et al., 2005; Jore et al., 2016). OMCI binds to the C5d, CUB, and C345c domains of C5, while RaCI binds to the MG1, MG2, and C5d domains (Jore et al., 2016). In both cases, these domains and the inhibitor binding sites are distant from C5a or the C5 convertase binding sites suggesting that these inhibitors do not directly inhibit interaction of convertases with C5, but probably inhibit rearrangement of domains within C5 that is necessary for activation to occur (Jore et al., 2016). Other complement inhibitors from soft ticks include the OMCI homologs TSGP2 and TSGP3 from O. kalahariensis (Mans and Ribeiro, 2008b). These inhibitors have K_D values in the low nM range (Table 1). A recent study that used site-specific immobilization of OMCI and multicycle kinetics indicated that the K_D may even be in the low pM ranges indicating that assay design can affect estimations of affinity (Macpherson et al., 2018). These inhibitors also show quite high expected concentrations at the feeding site, which is mostly due to their functioning as kratagonists (section below). Complement C5 occur at a concentration of ~370 nM in plasma and its activator (C3/C5 convertase) show K_m values of 5–16 nM for the classical and alternative complement pathways (Rawal and Pangburn, 2001, 2003). Therefore, even at low nM concentrations and the high concentrations of inhibitor expected at the feeding site, the tick proteins should be functionally relevant. Hard ticks also possess complement inhibitors that belong to the Isac/IRAC family (Valenzuela et al., 2000). These inhibitors target the C3 convertase complex (C3bBbP) of the alternative pathway and dissociate this complex, preventing binding of the convertase to C3. IC₅₀ values that range from 10 to 200 nM has been reported (Table 1). Of these inhibitors, Salp20 specifically target properdin of the C3 convertase complex and bind with a K_D~0.6 nM, which is much lower than the K_D of properdin (>85 nM) for C3b (Tyson et al., 2008). As such, these inhibitors should be functionally relevant at the feeding site although affinities for all homologs have not yet been determined. The blood-clotting inhibitor ixolaris targets the heparin-binding exosite of fXa, thereby disrupting formation of the prothrombinase complex with an IC₅₀ in the pM range (Francischetti et al., 2002; Monteiro et al., 2005). It would therefore be expected to be functionally relevant.

Inhibitors That Target Receptor Ligand-Binding Sites

Inhibitors that target cell receptors thereby blocking binding of natural ligands and receptor activation includes fibrinogen receptor (GPIIbIIIa; α_IIbβ₃) antagonists that inhibit platelet aggregation induced by any agonist (Karczewski et al., 1994; Wang et al., 1996; Mans et al., 2002b, 2008a; Tang et al., 2015). It has been shown that these inhibitors can also compete with bound fibrinogen to disaggregate aggregated platelets (Mans et al., 2002a). Binding to the fibrinogen receptor do not seem to result in outside-in signaling by these agonists. Inhibitors that target fibrinogen receptors need to be present at high concentrations, since platelets possess high numbers of the α_IIbβ₃ integrin on their surface (~80,000 receptors/platelet) (Wagner et al., 1996). This could result in concentrations of active receptor of ~39 nM at the feeding site. The affinity constant (K_D) for fibrinogen is ~1.4 μM, while fibrinogen occur in 10-fold excess (Frojmovic et al., 1994). It is therefore not unexpected that inhibitors would have K_D values in the nM range to bind to the receptor, while also occurring at μM concentrations to effectively compete with fibrinogen. Conversely, inhibitors with K_D or IC₅₀ values above 1 μM may not be effective inhibitors.

Tick adhesion inhibitor (TAI) inhibits adhesion of platelets to collagen with an IC₅₀ ~ 8 nM (Karczewski et al., 1995). Competitive inhibition (IC₅₀ ~ 5 nM) of binding of the monoclonal antibody Gi9 to the platelet collagen receptor GPIa-IIa (α₂β₁) confirmed targeting of this receptor by TAI (Karczewski et al., 1995). The collagen receptor (GP1a/IIa) occur at low receptor numbers on platelets (800 receptors/platelet) resulting in a concentration of ~400 pM at the feeding site (Coller et al., 1989). The affinity of collagen for platelets is also ~35–90 nM (Jung and Moroi, 1998). It is therefore not surprising that the affinity for collagen receptor antagonists may be in the low nM range, with similar low nM concentrations at the feeding site.

Longistatin binds to the V domain of the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) with a K_D ~ 72 nM, thereby inhibiting ligand-induced inflammation in tissues (Anisuzzaman et al., 2014). It has been detected at the feeding site using host antibodies and would therefore presumably be present at nM concentrations (Anisuzzaman et al., 2010). The concentration for RAGE is in the low pM ranges (Bopp et al., 2008) and longistatin should therefore be able to saturate the receptor at nM concentrations.

Inhibitors that target receptors and upon binding induce antagonistic responses do exist. Salp15 binds to the CD4 coreceptor on T cells with a K_D ~ 47 nM and inhibits T-cell receptor ligation induced activation resulting in immunosuppression (Anguita et al., 2002; Garg et al., 2006). Salp15 also interact with DC-SIGN on dendritic cells (DC) to activate the serine∖threonine kinase Raf-1. This leads to modulation of Toll-like receptor induced DC activation (Hovius et al., 2008). However, in the latter case no affinity assessment was done, so it remains difficult to assess the biological relevance of this at the tick-feeding site. The CD4 coreceptor occurs at ~16–664 pM (Platt et al., 1998), and if Salp15 occur at concentrations equal or above its K_D for the CD4 coreceptor should saturate the receptor and will be biologically relevant. The neurotoxins from Ixodes holocyclus are presumed to target and inhibit presynaptic P/Q-type voltage gated calcium channels (Chand et al., 2016). Recombinant holocyclotoxins have IC₅₀ values ranging from 5 to 12 μM, which seem to be orders of magnitude higher than the concentrations present in saliva (Chand et al., 2016), suggesting that a discrepancy still exist between the identified toxins and crude salivary composition (Pienaar et al., 2018).

Inhibitors That Target Soluble Protein Agonists

A number of soluble host protein agonists exist that play a role in inflammation and immunity. These generally bind to receptors on leukocytes to activate cellular responses and cellular migration and are collectively known as cytokines or chemokines (Sokol and Luster, 2015). Leukocytes include eosinophils, mast cells, monocytes, neutrophils and natural killer cells that migrate along chemokine concentration gradients caused by release of chemokines from sites of infection or inflammation (Moore et al., 2018). A large number of chemokines exist that have specificities for different cell types. Chemokines are classified based on their conserved disulphide bond patterns. C chemokines possess a single disulphide bond and consist of two chemokines (XCL1 and XCL2). CC chemokines (β-chemokines) possess two disulphide bonds, with adjacent cysteines near the N-terminal and consist of 28 chemokines (CCL1–CCL28), described thus far. CXC chemokines (α-chemokines) possess two disulphide bonds with the adjacent cysteines near the N-terminal separated by a single amino acid and consist of 17 chemokines (CXCL1–CXCL17), described to date. A number of inhibitors from ticks that interact directly with these soluble agonists and prevent binding to their receptors have been described and are known as the evasins (Frauenschuh et al., 2007; Déruaz et al., 2008). It has been shown that evasins can bind to a wide array of cytokines or chemokines (Table 1). Their K_D values range from low pM to nM.

In the case of chemokines where leukocytes respond to concentration gradients for directional chemotaxis, the measured gradients suggest that these may range across low pM to several hundred nM (Moore et al., 2018). Naturally formed gradients depend on various factors that will influence the concentration gradient, notably, the type of cell secreting the chemokine, the amount secreted that depend on environmental cues, the presence of flow-induced shear stress and interaction of the chemokines with the extracellular matrix (Moore et al., 2018). Depending on the K_D of the evasins (low nM), chemotaxis may only be efficiently inhibited somewhere along the concentration gradient and not across the whole range, especially since competition of evasins for different chemokines might occur.

Enzymes That Target Matrices or Matrix Components

Ticks feed from a feeding cavity where blood pools (Tatchell and Moorhouse, 1968). The feeding site needs to be remodeled to form this cavity (Wikel, 2017). Ticks may secrete a variety of enzymes that will enable such remodeling. This includes hyaluronidase that targets hyaluronic acid, a major component of the extracellular matrix (Neitz et al., 1978). Salivary transcriptomes also indicate that an abundant class of enzymes are the metalloproteases (Mans et al., 2016). While their role in feeding site remodeling has not been established beyond doubt, the general assumption is that these enzymes would play a role in remodeling (Mans, 2016; Wikel, 2017). Other metalloproteases that has been identified with a defined function include fibrin(ogen)ase activity that remove fibrinogen, both substrate for thrombin or platelet aggregation, or fibrin that forms the blood clot (Francischetti et al., 2003). Longistatin, a small EF-hand protein can hydrolyze α, β, and γ chains of fibrinogen, activates plasminogen to plasmin, degrade fibrin and dissolve fibrin clots (Anisuzzaman et al., 2011, 2012). Other enzymes that may target the fibrin clot without a direct interaction include plasminogen activators such as enolase that promote degradation of the fibrin clot via activation of the host enzyme plasminogen to plasmin (Díaz-Martín et al., 2013a; Xu X.L. et al., 2016). A serine protease that potentially activates protein C, a potent anticoagulant has also been identified in saliva of Ixodes scapularis (Pichu et al., 2014). For these “activating” enzymes the physiological effective concentrations in saliva may be low (pM–nM ranges) and detection of function in saliva (not salivary gland extract) may be enough to infer functional significance given their amplification/catalyzing nature.

Enzymes That Perform Scavenging Functions

Some enzymes may perform scavenging functions by targeting bioactive molecules and catalyzing chemical reactions that inactivate or remove these molecules. This may prevent activation of receptors, or induce antagonistic responses in receptors by removal of activating ligand. In ticks, the enzyme apyrase (ATP-diphosphohydrolase; EC 3.6.2.5) hydrolyse ATP that function in inflammation (Faas et al., 2017), as well as ADP that induce platelet aggregation (Ribeiro et al., 1985, 1991; Mans et al., 1998a, 2008a). Apyrase was able to disaggregate platelets aggregated by ADP and caused platelet shape change from an activated spherical back to discoid form (Mans et al., 1998b, 2000), suggesting that bound ADP could be scavenged from its platelet receptor. Apyrase activity has been found in saliva or salivary glands of most ticks studied and have been assigned to the 5′-nucleotidase family (Stutzer et al., 2009). Family members have been found in all tick transcriptomes studied to date (Mans et al., 2016). Kinetic parameters from purified apyrase indicated a K_m ~ 1 mM for ATP and ADP and high turnover number (10⁶ s^-1) and K_cat/K_m ratio (10⁹ M^-1s^-1) (Mans et al., 1998b). These numbers indicate a highly efficient enzyme that would rapidly hydrolyze high local concentrations of ADP or ATP. Given the relatively high concentration of apyrase found in tick salivary glands (Mans et al., 1998b), it would probably also be functionally relevant. Another enzyme found in ticks that perform scavenging functions is a metallo dipeptidyl carboxypeptidase responsible for salivary kininase activity and breakdown of anaphylatoxin and bradykinin, involved in inflammation, pain and vasoconstriction (Ribeiro and Spielman, 1986; Ribeiro and Mather, 1998; Bastiani et al., 2002). In all cases of “scavenging” enzymes, the enzymes need to be able to rapidly remove host-derived agonist to levels below their functional ranges.

Kratagonists That Perform Scavenging Functions

Kratagonists are related to “scavenging” enzymatic functions, by scavenging or mopping up of bioactive molecules, but without chemically changing their structures. Kratagonists may have similar functional activity as “scavenging” enzymes, such as preventing activation of receptors by ligands, or competitive removal of ligand from receptors causing an antagonistic response (Ribeiro and Arcà, 2009; Andersen and Ribeiro, 2017). The term kratagonist was recently coined to describe the abundant proteins found in saliva of most hematophagous organisms that function in a scavenging capacity (Ribeiro and Arcà, 2009). The name derives from the Greek “to arrest or to seize” and was appropriately proposed independently by the Greek compatriots Babis Savakis and Michalis Kotsyfakis (Ribeiro and Arcà, 2009). Recently the etymology of the name was redefined to indicate “hold” or “grab/capture” and “agonist” (Andersen and Ribeiro, 2017; Arcà and Ribeiro, 2018). In ticks a large number of kratagonists have been described, that all belong to the lipocalin family. Lipocalin structure is composed of an eight stranded anti-parallel β-barrel closed off at one end by an N-terminal 3₁₀-helix, with a C-terminal α-helix anchored to the side of the barrel by disulphide bonds. This gives lipocalins the distinct appearance of a cup with an open end, where ligands can access the cup and bind in the cavity inside the barrel. Specificity is conferred by residues inside the barrel, as well as four loops that allow access to the barrel (Flower, 1996). The original name of lipocalin was assigned to “extracellular proteins capable of enclosing lipophiles within their structure to minimize solvent contact” (Pervaiz and Brew, 1987). Subsequently, lipocalins were defined based on conserved sequence or structural motifs (Flower, 1996). Scavenging functions performed by tick lipocalins include scavenging of histamine and serotonin (Paesen et al., 1999; Sangamnatdej et al., 2002; Mans et al., 2008b; Neelakanta et al., 2018), leukotriene B4 (Beaufays et al., 2008; Mans and Ribeiro, 2008b; Roversi et al., 2013), leukotriene C4 (Mans and Ribeiro, 2008a), thromboxane A2 (Mans and Ribeiro, 2008b), and cholesterol (Preston et al., 2013; Roversi et al., 2017).

In the case of small chemical agonists that are scavenged by either enzymes or kratagonists, the concentrations at which they activate their respective receptors are important. Platelets secrete ADP and ATP at 3–7 μM concentrations, which are also the concentration necessary for primary and secondary aggregation (Packham and Rand, 2011). Apyrase from ticks has been shown to effectively inhibit platelet aggregation at these activator concentrations, at enzyme concentrations well below the expected secretory levels (Mans et al., 1998b). Basophils and mast cells may secrete histamine to attain local concentrations of 20 μM in the skin that can lead to inflammatory responses when histamine binds to its receptors with K_D ~ 10 nM–30 μM (Petersen, 1997; MacGlashan, 2003). Serotonin is secreted by platelets at local concentrations of ~5 μM where it can cause vasoconstriction and platelet aggregation by binding to various serotonin receptors with K_i ~ 10 nM–1 μM (Watts et al., 2012). The very high concentrations of biogenic amine binding kratagonists at the feeding site (μM–mM) and their low affinities (low nM) indicate that they will be biologically relevant at the feeding site (Table 1).

Leukotriene B₄ secreted by neutrophils may reach high concentrations at the site of neutrophil release (~950 nM) (Lewis et al., 1982). The affinity of LTB₄ for its neutrophil receptor BLT1 ranges from 0.1 to 2 nM (Yokomizo, 2015). Again, the low affinities observed for the LTB₄ scavengers and their high concentrations (μM) at the feeding sites would make them relevant competitors at the feeding site.

Cysteinyl leukotrienes can only be detected in plasma during inflammatory reactions such as asthma attacks and then occur at concentrations of ~100–765 pM (Sasagawa et al., 1994). It has been shown to cause vasoconstriction and vasopermeability at a concentration of ~100 nM, and bind with affinities from 5 to 35 nM to its receptors (Drazen et al., 1980; Krilis et al., 1983; Ghiglieri-Bertez et al., 1986; Prié et al., 1995). Scavengers of LTC₄ and LTD₄ have K_D values below 2 nM and also occur at μM concentrations (Table 1). It is therefore also expected that they would be physiologically relevant during feeding.

Thromboxane A₂ is released from platelets at concentrations of 11–35 nM, which is capable of inducing platelet aggregation and bind to platelet receptors with K_D ~ 4 nM (Hamberg et al., 1975; Dorn and DeJesus, 1991). The high concentrations of the TXA₂ kratagonists at the feeding site (μM–mM) and their low affinities (low nM) suggest that they would be able to neutralize TXA₂ binding to its receptor during feeding (Table 1).

Activators of Host Regulatory Systems

The majority of tick host modulatory mechanisms described so far comprise inhibitors. However, activators may also play important roles since these may target the natural regulatory feedback systems of host hemostasis. Plasminogen activators that result in degradation of the fibrin clot have already been discussed. Recently, a small peptide named ixonnexin that belongs to the basic tail family was described that act by promoting interaction of plasminogen and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) by forming a enzymatically productive ternary complex that forms plasmin to promote fibrinolysis (Assumpção et al., 2018). Ixonnexin interacts with both plasminogen and tPA with similar K_D values (4–20 nM). Such an activator would need to be present at similar or higher concentrations than the target enzymes to be functionally relevant. In the case of ixonnexin, plasminogen and tPA occur at plasma concentrations of ~2 μM and 100 pM, respectively (MacGregor and Prowse, 1983; Assumpção et al., 2018). While no exact concentration has been established for ixonnexin, it has been estimated to occur at high concentrations in saliva (Assumpção et al., 2018). It has also been suggested that all basic tail proteins may perform this function, including the fXa inhibitor Salp14, since this family in which the C-terminal is rich in basic amino acids such as lysine and arginine mimics the C-terminal lysine present in fibrin that serves as recognition site for plasminogen and tPA lysine binding sites (Assumpção et al., 2018).

The adrenomedullins are a special case of tick-derived inhibitors that bind to host calcitonin-receptor-like receptor and receptor activity-modifying protein receptor complexes to cause vasodilation (Iwanaga et al., 2014). These inhibitors have not converged to mimic host adrenomedullin, but have been acquired via horizontal gene transfer from a mammalian host (Iwanaga et al., 2014). At systemic concentrations of ~7 nM it reduced blood pressure by almost 50% (Table 1). It may therefore be assumed that secretion of such low quantities during feeding may result in local vasodilatory effects. However, it’s presence in saliva at functional concentrations still needs to be confirmed.

An activator of MaxiK channels have been described in R. appendiculatus, where it presumably play a role in regulation of blood vessel tonus and blood flow (Paesen et al., 2009). It invoked a half maximal response in MaxiK channels at 1 μM. Its functionality at the feeding site remains to be resolved.

Non-protein Agonists and Inhibitors

Ticks may also secrete non-protein agonists that could affect the host’s defense mechanisms. As such, ixodid ticks secrete prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), a potent vasodilator, at ~40–500 ng/ml saliva (Ribeiro et al., 1985, 1992; Inokuma et al., 1994). Concentrations of PGE2 may range from 79 nM to 994 μM in adults at the feeding site, which would be pharmacologically active, since the K_D of the PGE2 receptor is ~0.7 nM (Davis and Sharif, 2000). Another non-protein mechanism for modulating host inflammatory and pain sensing responses was recently reported that involved secretion of saliva-specific microRNAs that was detected in salivary exosomes using next-generation sequencing (Hackenberg et al., 2017; Hackenberg and Kotsyfakis, 2018). The efficiency of exosomal miRNA will depend on the concentrations of exosomes in saliva, the specificity of the exosomes for specific cell types and the concentration of miRNA inside the exosomes (Hu et al., 2012). As yet, the functional relevance of saliva-derived exosomal miRNA still needs to be confirmed, with their kinetics of inhibition resolved, since the question remains whether a single exosome would only target a single lymphocyte or epithelial cell, in which case the effectiveness of inhibition would be determined by the number of cells that can be neutralized at the feeding site. It would, however, add another complex repertoire to the ticks expanding modulatory mechanisms.

Strategies to Circumvent the Affinity/Equilibrium Barrier

It is evident that the majority of tick proteins thus far characterized would have physiological functionality at the feeding site (Figure 3 and Table 1). However, expression and secretion of high concentrations of secretory proteins via the salivary secretory granules may be restricted to very few proteins given physical constraints of granule packaging (Mans and Neitz, 2004b). The dynamic nature of the feeding site may also make the actual concentrations of tick proteins present at any given moment much more haphazard than expected. The concentrations at the feeding site may very well be 100–10,000-fold lower than estimated, in which case concentrations may drop to pM–nM for most proteins, which may be below the K_D values for many proteins. To address this, ticks may employ various alternative strategies that allow adequate expression and optimal use of secreted proteins at the feeding site that allow ticks to circumvent or eliminate the problems posed by an equilibrium system (Figure 6). The next section discusses such strategies in more detail.

FIGURE 6

Redundancy as Means to Control Complexity and Chaos

The host’s defense systems such as the clotting, platelet aggregation, complement and inflammatory cascades are part of one big redundant integrated feedback system that allows rapid response as well as control of the system (Delvaeye and Conway, 2009; Deppermann and Kubes, 2016; Wiegner et al., 2016). It has been argued that this redundancy is mimicked in the complexity of functions observed in the salivary glands of blood-feeding arthropods (Ribeiro, 1995). Conversely, it has been argued that the complexity observed in the functional salivary repertoire of ticks is due to a highly optimized system of defense shaped by evolution (Nuttall, 2019). However, redundancy may serve the purpose of dealing with a highly dynamic and chaotic system, as may be seen at the feeding site, which is in constant flux with ever changing concentrations of target and inhibitor molecules. Targeting of many different host proteins at once, even if not at optimal concentrations, may disrupt a redundant system enough to allow successful feeding. In this environment no protein needs to be 100% effective, but only good enough to get the job done. This may allow non-optimal proteins to function at the feeding site, or be maintained while evolving more optimized functions as postulated in the playground hypothesis of neutral evolution (Mans et al., 2017). The question then becomes a matter of how much inhibition of the host’s defense systems would be necessary to ensure successful feeding. In this regard, three observations could be made: firstly, that inefficient inhibition was surely a given during the early stages of adaptation to a blood-feeding lifestyle since protein functions were still optimized by natural selection. Secondly, since ticks had to switch hosts throughout their evolution, we have no evidence that ticks are not still adapting to new hosts, and functions that seem to be only partially effective may indeed still be optimized in future through natural selection. Thirdly, given the relatively high concentrations that may be obtained at the feeding site, even if proteins may only be partially effective, may allow for selection of these non-optimal functions to improve efficiency, again supporting a neutral evolution of function hypothesis (Mans et al., 2017). These arguments should, however, not serve as a carte blanche to support every claim of functional significance in blood-feeding, since the contribution of salivary derived proteins to species fitness has not been elucidated yet or even proven beyond doubt.

Fast Feeding, Storage and Secretion of a Large Bolus of Salivary Proteins

Soft ticks feed within minutes to hours to repletion, drop off, digest the blood meal slowly over the course of weeks to months, lay a small egg batch and can then feed several times more using the same pattern (Mans and Neitz, 2004a). During fast feeding most salivary proteins may be secreted in the course of 10–30 min and will be replenished within several days after feeding. Secretory proteins are stored in large granules up to 10 μM in diameter that effectively fill the salivary gland cells to their maximum extent (Mans and Neitz, 2004b; Mans et al., 2004b). The protein profiles of soft tick SGE attest to this, since protein spectra rarely show the presence of genomic DNA, in contrast to SGE from hard ticks that predominantly show genomic DNA/RNA, while the protein peak and concentration is obscured (Figure 7). This strategy from soft ticks allows concentrations of proteins that can overcome relatively high equilibrium dissociation constants by sheer concentration effects alone. Hard ticks utilize this strategy to some extent, since different salivary gland cells are filled with secretory granules over the course of the feeding period that can last several days to weeks (Binnington and Kemp, 1980). However, the amount of protein found in crude salivary gland extract rarely exceeds the concentrations of genomic DNA and is generally less than what would be observed for soft ticks (Figure 7), and may range from 5 to 60 μg total soluble protein over the course of feeding for a small tick such as R. appendiculatus (Wang and Nuttall, 1994). Similarly, concentrations in pilocarpine-induced salivary secretions in hard ticks are generally lower than soft ticks, with soft ticks attaining ~20–40 mg/ml and hard ticks ranging from 700 to 60 μg/ml over the course of feeding (Howell et al., 1975; Ribeiro, 1987; Ribeiro et al., 1991; Dharampaul et al., 1993; Chand et al., 2016).

FIGURE 7

Communal Feeding to Increase Local Concentrations at the Feeding Site

Hard ticks feed for several days to weeks and mating on the host (or off the host for some Ixodes species) during the slow pre-feeding phase is required before the rapid engorgement phase can occur (Kiszewski et al., 2001). To allow mate finding, males secrete attraction-aggregation-attachment pheromones that result in ticks clustering and co-feeding at the same feeding site (Sonenshine, 2004). In a similar manner, specific tick species generally have preference sites of attachment on the host, presumably due to host environmental cues. While males do not engorge or take a significant blood meal, they do attach and secrete salivary components into the communal feeding site that apparently assist females in blood meal acquisition (Wang et al., 1998, 2001a). Creation of a communal locality where all ticks contribute to the localized but systemic feeding site may result in combined concentrations that overcome affinity restricted barriers.

Gene Dosage and Cumulative Contributions From Multigene Families

Proteins may be maintained as gene duplicates to allow high level expression from each family member (Mans et al., 2017). While each member may by itself completely inhibit host functions, even partial inhibition by each gene duplicate can result in complete inhibition. This is a relatively simple example of the gene dosage effect that has been observed for fibrinogen receptor antagonists (Mans et al., 2003a, 2008a) and LTB₄ scavengers (Mans et al., 2003b; Mans and Ribeiro, 2008b). It has been proposed that multigene families express different antigenic variable family members at low concentration levels to escape the immune system, the varying epitope hypothesis (Couvreur et al., 2008; Chmelař et al., 2016b). In this scenario, the low-level expressed proteins cumulatively target the same receptor to attain a combined concentration that would allow receptor saturation and inhibition. This may be possible, even if expressed at concentrations well below the equilibrium dissociation constant, since the inhibitory effects may be summed if the inhibitors act in a mutually exclusive manner (1:1 receptor-ligand binding with no synergistic effects) (Chou and Talalay, 1977). A cumulative effect was recently shown for the holocyclotoxins from the paralysis tick, Ixodes holocyclus, where at least 19 holocyclotoxin genes were expressed at low levels that showed a cumulative paralysis effect when combined (Rodriguez-Valle et al., 2017). It should be noted that while immune evasion was proposed as reason for the multiplicity of gene family members, low level expression of multiple genes to attain a cumulative threshold concentration that allows effective inhibition may also be possible and may fit with the overall neutral evolution of tick salivary gland proteins previously proposed (Mans et al., 2017). Low-level expression may in this scenario also be a function of the constitutive differential expression observed in hard ticks, where the extreme high expression levels observed in soft ticks due to accumulation in granules may not be attainable. Even so, it remains to be quantitatively proven that cumulative contributions to attain a threshold concentration occur at the feeding site.

Increasing Concentration at the Feeding Site

The vertebrate host uses localized cues and responses to maintain and regulate haemostasis. As such, wounds or breakdown in system integrity are detected by exposure of localized collagen or other extracellular matrix components, activation of platelets and exposure of procoagulant platelet surfaces, initiation of blood-clotting and the complement cascade on activated platelet surfaces (Delvaeye and Conway, 2009; Deppermann and Kubes, 2016; Wiegner et al., 2016). In a similar manner, targeting of tick-derived bioactive molecules to activated surfaces, whether tick or host surfaces can increase local concentrations and prevent loss or dilution of components via blood meal ingestion or systemic diffusion. Salivary proteins have been found in tick cement where they presumably function as inhibitors of host defenses, or to prevent recognition of cement as a foreign or activation surface for host defenses (Bullard et al., 2016). Proteins such as apyrase have asymmetric charged surfaces (Stutzer et al., 2009), suggesting that these would be attracted to activated negatively charged platelet membranes. Other tick proteins has been shown to interact with membranes or have higher inhibitory activity in the presence of membranes, suggesting that these proteins may be concentrated on activated membrane surfaces at the feeding site (Ehebauer et al., 2002; Schuijt et al., 2013). Some Kunitz-domain inhibitors such as ixolaris have long carboxy-termini rich in serine and threonine residues that can be the site of glycosylation (Francischetti et al., 2002). These would create mucin tails that would be sticky and allow concentration on the walls of the feeding cavity preventing removal and increasing concentration (Francischetti et al., 2009). This may be a general strategy for glycosylated tick proteins (Uhlír et al., 1994).

Increasing Effective Concentration Using Multiple Binding Sites or Multiple Functions

In the case of some tick lipocalins their effective concentration is increased by possessing two independent binding sites for histamine or one for histamine and one for serotonin (Paesen et al., 2000; Sangamnatdej et al., 2002; Mans et al., 2008b). This increase their capacity for scavenging twofold. Another variation on this may be proteins that can potentially target many independent ligands or targets and may therefore have multiple functions. While this certainly expands the potential of proteins to work within a complex redundant environment, the most effective of these would be proteins that have independent function and mechanisms. For example, targeting of complement C5 and LTB₄ allows OMCI and its homologs to inhibit both complement and LTB₄ mediated inflammation at the same time (Nunn et al., 2005; Mans and Ribeiro, 2008b; Roversi et al., 2013). In this case, both functions target the two key non-redundant mediators of neutrophil recruitment during inflammation that seems to be intricately linked (Sadik et al., 2018). This is a remarkable convergence of function in a single protein (Mans et al., 2017). On the other hand, if the functional mechanisms are not independent, i.e., use the same site for ligand binding or the same protein surface to target different proteins, competition between targets will effectively lower the concentration of available inhibitor, thereby impacting its functionality. This may be seen for moubatin and its homologs that bind both LTB₄ and TXA₂ within the same lipocalin cavity at similar affinities (Mans and Ribeiro, 2008b). If both LTB₄ and TXA₂ are present at similar concentrations, the effective scavenging capability may be halved. One way to compensate for this may be multiple proteins or very high concentrations at the feeding site as observed for moubatin, TSGP2 and TSGP3. The same problem would face many of the enzyme inhibitors that can inhibit two or more enzymes from a specific class such as the cystatins, where the presence of many different host enzymes at the feeding site would lead to competition with the tick inhibitors. Similarly, the evasins can bind to many chemokines with similar affinities that may lead to competition of evasins for different chemokines, thereby reducing their effectivity.

Suicide Inhibitors

Inhibitors that bind in a 1:1 manner to their target enzymes, and then serve as substrate, resulting in the formation of a covalent enzyme-inhibitor complex, circumvent the equilibrium dissociation problem completely. Their initial affinities need only to be high enough for the enzyme to catalyze its reaction and form the covalent complex to result in permanent inhibition. In ticks, such inhibitors are found in the serpins that target various enzymes of the clotting cascade (Chmelař et al., 2017). Serpins form covalent complexes with their respective serine proteases after cleavage (Whisstock et al., 2010).

Differential Expression

Ixodid ticks express different proteins at different periods during feeding (McSwain et al., 1982; Paesen et al., 1999; Wang et al., 2001b; Kim et al., 2017; Perner et al., 2018). Possible reasons proposed for this include antigenic variation to escape the immune system (Chmelař et al., 2016b), or responses to changes at the feeding site such as wound healing (Francischetti et al., 2005). Differential expression may also occur as salivary gland morphology changes during the course of feeding and different cell types play different roles in the feeding process (Binnington and Kemp, 1980). As such, differential expression may allow increased concentration spikes of proteins in specific feeding windows.

Minimizing Feeding Site Volume

Comparison of adult, nymphal, and larval concentrations at the feeding site indicates that the relative concentrations remain constant between the various life stages even though salivary gland concentrations may differ several fold (Figure 3). This is mostly due to the differences observed in feeding cavity size that scale relative to the life stage and tick size. If this observation holds for all tick species it would imply that smaller ticks compensate by creating smaller feeding cavities. Feeding cavity size may then be related to protein concentration secreted during feeding.

Smaller Proteins Allow Higher Molar Concentrations

The majority of secretory salivary proteins in ticks have low molecular masses below 25 kDa. This include the majority of highly abundant protein families such as the basic tail secretory, Kunitz-BPTI and lipocalin families (Mans et al., 2008c, 2016; Mans, 2011). Lower molecular masses allow higher relative molar concentrations at the feeding site, which could result in an up to a 10-fold difference between a 5 and 50 kDa protein (Figure 3).

Functional Relevance and Mechanism

Understanding the mechanism of action (how a given protein works) is important in accessing functional relevance. As example, the case of moubatin may be considered. Originally moubatin was identified as a specific inhibitor of collagen-induced platelet aggregation with an IC₅₀ ~ 50 nM, that did not affect ADP, arachidonic acid, thrombin, ristocetin, or calcium ionophore A23187 induced platelet aggregation (Waxman and Connolly, 1993). Subsequently, recombinant moubatin was shown to inhibit collagen-induced platelet aggregation with IC₅₀ ~ 100 nM but did not inhibit adhesion to collagen (Keller et al., 1993). At high concentrations (5.8 μM) of moubatin and low concentrations of ADP (2 μM) 40% inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation was observed, suggesting that the cyclooxygenase pathway may be targeted. It was also shown that moubatin at these high concentrations could inhibit the TXA₂ mimetic U46619 and competed with the TXA₂ receptor antagonist SQ29548 for binding to platelet membranes with IC₅₀ ~ 10 μM (Keller et al., 1993). The leech inhibitor LAPP did not compete with SQ29548 binding to platelets, indicating that different receptors were targeted. Moubatin also did not inhibit binding of the monoclonal antibody Gi9 that inhibited adhesion to collagen and interacts with integrin α₂β₁, the proposed receptor for adhesion to collagen. At the time, moubatin did not share sequence homology with any inhibitor of collagen-induced platelet aggregation or with collagen, and did not contain the RGD motif important in integrin recognition. From the complex data above it was suggested that moubatin might be a TXA₂ receptor antagonist (Keller et al., 1993). Subsequently, it was shown that moubatin’s mechanism of collagen-induced platelet aggregation is exclusively via scavenging of TXA₂ with K_D ~ 20 nM, by gain and loss of function mutations in TSGP2 and TSGP3, respectively, two closely related homologs (Mans and Ribeiro, 2008b). In retrospect, it may be considered that the only inhibitory paradigms at the time were interaction with either collagen or specific platelet receptors and that the kratagonist paradigm as formulated recently did not exist. Interpreting the moubatin results from the previous paradigms may have been logical, even if the high IC₅₀ observed for SQ29548 should have raised flags. It may now be suggested that moubatin was scavenging SQ29548 (a TXA₂ mimetic), albeit with low affinity and did not compete for the receptor. Several lines of evidence converged on moubatin as scavenger of TXA₂: the evidence that moubatin belonged to the lipocalin family (Paesen et al., 1999; Mans et al., 2003b); the fact that lipocalins are highly abundant in salivary glands and that abundant proteins generally act as scavengers, i.e., the kratagonist paradigm (Mans et al., 2001, 2003b; Mans and Neitz, 2004a,b; Calvo et al., 2006); the inhibitory effect of moubatin on the TXA₂ mimetic U46619 (Keller et al., 1993), and the observation that a closely related protein, OMCI bound ricinoleic acid, suggesting that moubatin may bind prostaglandins and thromboxanes (Roversi et al., 2007). The gain of function mutation in TSGP2 of R85G and a similar complete loss of function for TSGP3 with the mutation G85R, allowed unambiguous confirmation of functional relevance as TXA₂ scavengers (Mans and Ribeiro, 2008b). It not only highlighted the reductionist paradigm in elucidation of function, but also showed how elucidation of mechanism may inform on which function is considered relevant. As such, moubatin is an inhibitor of collagen-induced platelet aggregation, but perform this function by scavenging the secondary agonist TXA₂. Its mechanism is primarily as kratagonist and not as receptor or ligand neutralizing inhibitor. Once mechanism is clarified the parameters necessary to assess functional significance can be better defined. In this case, that any homolog has to bind TXA₂ in the low nM range, be present at high concentrations and possess the R85G substitution to be functionally relevant.

Systems Biology, Bioinformatics and Functional Relevance

While the majority of functions found in ticks may be assigned functional significance (Table 1), enough reports in the literature indicate that caution should be exercised when evaluating functional relevance. This is compounded by advances in technology that allow systems approaches to the analysis of salivary gland protein dynamics and bioinformatics that allows functional analysis in silico. As such, recent advances in technology, both in next-generation transcriptome sequencing and proteomics, has allowed an unprecedented view of salivary gland dynamics from a systems perspective (Schwarz et al., 2014; Chmelař et al., 2016a; Mans et al., 2016; Kim et al., 2017). This has indicated how ticks differentially up- or down-regulate proteins during various time intervals in feeding, which suggest that ticks actively respond to the feeding environment, reflecting a fine tuned adaptation to the hosts defense mechanisms. While the systems paradigm clearly show how dynamic expression may be in ticks, inferences regarding function rests on inference by homology or annotation. For example, a recent excellent proteomic study followed the expression profile of I. scapularis sampled every 24 h until detachment and indicated differential expression for a large number of lipocalins annotated as histamine-binding proteins (Kim et al., 2017). The discussion focused on the functionality of lipocalins as histamine scavengers and how the data would support tick responses to host immunity and feeding. Interestingly, a functional study into biogenic amine binding lipocalins that specifically targeted I. scapularis lipocalins with biogenic amine binding motifs, failed to find any histamine-binding lipocalins, but only identified serotonin-binding lipocalins with a single binding site (Mans et al., 2008b). While this does not exclude the possibility that histamine-binding lipocalins exist in Ixodes ticks, the results thus far do not support it. Similarly, bioinformatic analysis predicted high affinity binding of histamine and serotonin in lipocalins from Ixodes ricinus, for which none of the critical residues involved in biogenic amine binding was conserved (Valdés et al., 2016). Molecular docking also recently predicted nM affinities for cystatins from Ixodes persulcatus without experimental verification of affinities or target enzymes (Rangel et al., 2017). While such bioinformatic and systems approaches can certainly direct research to proteins of interest, the data should be used with caution to infer functional relevance, especially if the possibility exists that some of these proteins may be only transiently expressed or at concentrations too low for functionality. For systems biology to come of age, we need accurate dissection of the feeding site in real-time to quantify fluxes in protein concentration while performing quality control with validated functions.

Is Functional Relevance Relevant?

It may be considered whether it really matters whether a measured function is relevant during feeding, given the emerging recognition that all proteins may be moonlighting to some extent. From this perspective, any function present in tick saliva should be relevant at some level and our goal for the next few decades would be to assign functions to salivary proteins, whether relevant or not. A more comprehensive understanding would later emerge once we have gathered enough data to truly assess relevance. This position is appealing since it buys some time for dubious functions. It is, however, also a philosophical “everything goes” viewpoint (Feyerabend, 1975), that makes distinguishing important from trivial function very difficult. The same issue has been raised with regard to whether all ticks are venomous, or whether only some ticks secrete toxins that may cause the various well recognized forms of tick paralysis and toxicoses (Pienaar et al., 2018). By treating all ticks as venomous, the meaning of toxicity is obscured. Similarly, by treating all functions in saliva as relevant at the feeding site, even if their functional parameters suggest that they would not be relevant, may obscure those central in the feeding process from peripheral functions.

Functional Relevance From a Practical Perspective

The use of tick salivary proteins as therapeutic agents within a clinical or pharmaceutical setting remains an important and promising goal (Mans, 2005). From this perspective any function determined for a protein need not be functionally relevant at the tick feeding site, as long as the specific parameters for use has been determined that would allow it to function under clinical or therapeutic controlled conditions. For example, the half-life of OMCI could be improved >50-fold by PASylation, making it more relevant for clinical use (Kuhn et al., 2016). In a similar vein, anti-tick vaccines may be developed against proteins with unknown functions or even irrelevant function, as long as the vaccine shows efficacy, as for example for hidden antigens (Nuttall et al., 2006). On the other hand, development of vaccines against exposed antigens may work better if antigens with real functional significance at the feeding site can be defined, their mechanism of action elucidated and this information used to rationally design target strategies that would neutralize function at the feeding site effectively.

Conclusion

Functional relevance is determined by the concentration of tick proteins at the feeding site as well as their affinity for their respective host targets. The current review showed that the majority of proteins found in tick saliva or salivary glands thus far characterized will be functional at the tick feeding site. It was also shown how ticks may circumvent the problems presented by an equilibrium system. Even so, inferring functional relevance without estimating concentration or affinity at the feeding site remains a risky endeavor. Future aims in salivary gland biology should focus on quantification of protein concentration secreted during feeding as well as in the actual feeding site. This should provide more accurate estimates of functional relevance.

References

• 1

  AdamsT. E.HuntingtonJ. A. (2006). Thrombin–Cofactor interactions. Structural insights into regulatory mechanisms.Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.261738–1745. 10.1161/01.atv.0000228844.65168.d1

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  AlenaziY.SinghK.DaviesG.EatonJ. R. O.EldersP.KawamuraA.et al (2018). Genetically engineered two-warhead evasins provide a method to achieve precision targeting of disease-relevant chemokine subsets.Sci. Rep.8:6333. 10.1038/s41598-018-24568-9

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  AnastopoulosP.ThurnM. J.BroadyK. W. (1991). Anticoagulant in the tick Ixodes holocyclus.Aust. Vet. J.68366–367. 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1991.tb00740.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  AndersenJ. F.RibeiroJ. M. C. (2017). “Salivary kratagonists: scavengers of host physiological effectors during blood feeding,” in Arthropod Vector: Controller of Disease TransmissionVol. 2edsWikelS. K.AksoyS.DimopoulosG. (Amsterdam: Elsevier) 51–63. 10.1016/b978-0-12-805360-7.00004-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  AnguitaJ.RamamoorthiN.HoviusJ. W.DasS.ThomasV.PersinskiR.et al (2002). Salp15, an Ixodes scapularis salivary protein, inhibits CD4(+) T cell activation.Immunity16849–859. 10.1016/s1074-7613(02)00325-4

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  AnisuzzamanM.HattaT.MiyoshiT.MatsubayashiM.IslamM. K.AlimM. A.et al (2014). Longistatin in tick saliva blocks advanced glycation end-product receptor activation.J. Clin. Invest.1244429–4444. 10.1172/jci74917

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  AnisuzzamanM.IslamK.AlimM. A.MiyoshiT.HattaT.YamajiK.et al (2011). Longistatin, a plasminogen activator, is key to the availability of blood-meals for ixodid ticks.PLoS Pathog.7:e1001312. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001312

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  AnisuzzamanM.IslamK.AlimM. A.MiyoshiT.HattaT.YamajiK.et al (2012). Longistatin is an unconventional serine protease and induces protective immunity against tick infestation.Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.18245–53. 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2011.12.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  AnisuzzamanM.IslamK.MiyoshiT.AlimM. A.HattaT.YamajiK.et al (2010). Longistatin, a novel EF-hand protein from the ixodid tick Haemaphysalis longicornis, is required for acquisition of host blood-meals.Int. J. Parasitol.40721–729. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.11.004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  ArcàB.RibeiroJ. M. (2018). Saliva of hematophagous insects: a multifaceted toolkit.Curr. Opin. Insect Sci.29102–109. 10.1016/j.cois.2018.07.012

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  ArolasJ. L.LorenzoJ.RoviraA.CastellàJ.AvilesF. X.SommerhoffC. P. (2005). A carboxypeptidase inhibitor from the tick Rhipicephalus bursa: isolation, cDNA cloning, recombinant expression, and characterization.J. Biol. Chem.2803441–3448. 10.1074/jbc.m411086200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  ArthurD. R. (1970). Tick feeding and its implications.Adv. Parasitol.8275–292. 10.1016/s0065-308x(08)60258-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  AssumpçãoT. C.MaD.MizuriniD. M.KiniR. M.RibeiroJ. M.KotsyfakisM.et al (2016). In vitro mode of action and anti-thrombotic activity of boophilin, a multifunctional Kunitz protease inhibitor from the midgut of a tick vector of babesiosis, Rhipicephalus microplus.PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.10:e0004298. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004298

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  AssumpçãoT. C.MizuriniD. M.MaD.MonteiroR. Q.AhlstedtS.ReyesM.et al (2018). Ixonnexin from tick saliva promotes fibrinolysis by interacting with plasminogen and tissue-type plasminogen activator, and prevents arterial thrombosis.Sci. Rep.8:4806. 10.1038/s41598-018-22780-1

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  BakkesD. K.De KlerkD.LatifA. A.MansB. J. (2018). Integrative taxonomy of Afrotropical Ornithodoros (Ornithodoros) (Acari: Ixodida: Argasidae).Ticks Tick Borne Dis.91006–1037. 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2018.03.024

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  BastianiM.HillebrandS.HornF.KistT. B.GuimarãesJ. A.TermignoniC. (2002). Cattle tick Boophilus microplus salivary gland contains a thiol-activated metalloendopeptidase displaying kininase activity.Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.321439–1446. 10.1016/s0965-1748(02)00064-4

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17

  BatistaI. F.RamosO. H.VenturaJ. S.Junqueira-de-AzevedoI. L.HoP. L.Chudzinski-TavassiA. M. (2010). A new factor Xa inhibitor from Amblyomma cajennense with a unique domain composition.Arch. Biochem. Biophys.493151–156. 10.1016/j.abb.2009.10.009

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  BeaufaysJ.AdamB.Menten-DedoyartC.FievezL.GrosjeanA.DecremY.et al (2008). Ir-LBP, an Ixodes ricinus tick salivary LTB4-binding lipocalin, interferes with host neutrophil function.PLoS One3:e3987. 10.1371/journal.pone.0003987

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  BinningtonK. C.KempD. H. (1980). Role of tick salivary glands in feeding and disease transmission.Adv. Parasitol.18315–339. 10.1016/s0065-308x(08)60403-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  BoppC.HoferS.WeitzJ.BierhausA.NawrothP. P.MartinE.et al (2008). sRAGE is elevated in septic patients and associated with patients outcome.J. Surg. Res.14779–83. 10.1016/j.jss.2007.07.014

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  BrahmaR. K.BlanchetG.KaurS.KiniR. M.DoleyR. (2017). Expression and characterization of haemathrins, madanin-like thrombin inhibitors, isolated from the salivary gland of tick Haemaphysalis bispinosa (Acari: Ixodidae).Thromb. Res.15220–29. 10.1016/j.thromres.2017.01.012

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22

  BrancoV. G.IqbalA.Alvarez-FloresM. P.ScianiJ. M.de AndradeS. A.IwaiL. K.et al (2016). Amblyomin-X having a Kunitz-type homologous domain, is a noncompetitive inhibitor of FXa and induces anticoagulation in vitro and in vivo.Biochim. Biophys. Acta18641428–1435. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2016.07.011

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  BrownS. J.KnappF. W. (1980a). Amblyomma americanum: sequential histological analysis of larval and nymphal feeding sites on guinea pigs. Exp. Parasitol.49188–205. 10.1016/0014-4894(80)90116-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  BrownS. J.KnappF. W. (1980b). Amblyomma americanum: sequential histological analysis of adult feeding sites on guinea pigs. Exp. Parasitol.49303–318. 10.1016/0014-4894(80)90067-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  BrownS. J.WormsM. J.AskenaseP. W. (1983). Rhipicephalus appendiculatus: larval feeding sites in guinea pigs actively sensitized and receiving immune serum. Exp. Parasitol.55111–120. 10.1016/0014-4894(83)90004-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  BullardR.AllenP.ChaoC. C.DouglasJ.DasP.MorganS. E.et al (2016). Structural characterization of tick cement cones collected from in vivo and artificial membrane blood-fed lone star ticks (Amblyomma americanum).Ticks Tick Borne Dis.7880–892. 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2016.04.006

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  ButenasS.MannK. G. (2002). Blood coagulation.Biochemistry673–12.

  • Google Scholar

• 28

  CalvoE.MansB. J.AndersenJ. F.RibeiroJ. M. (2006). Function and evolution of a mosquito salivary protein family.J. Biol. Chem.2811935–1942. 10.1074/jbc.m510359200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  CaoJ.ShiL.ZhouY.GaoX.ZhangH.GongH.et al (2013). Characterization of a new Kunitz-type serine protease inhibitor from the hard tick Rhipicephalus hemaphysaloides.Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol.84104–113. 10.1002/arch.21118

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  ChalaireK. C.KimT. K.Garcia-RodriguezH.MulengaA. (2011). Amblyomma americanum (L.) (Acari: Ixodidae) tick salivary gland serine protease inhibitor (serpin) 6 is secreted into tick saliva during tick feeding.J. Exp. Biol.214665–673. 10.1242/jeb.052076

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  ChandK. K.LeeK. M.LavidisN. A.Rodriguez-ValleM.IjazH.KoehbachJ.et al (2016). Tick holocyclotoxins trigger host paralysis by presynaptic inhibition.Sci. Rep.6:29446. 10.1038/srep29446

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  ChmelařJ.KotálJ.KarimS.KopacekP.FrancischettiI. M. B.PedraJ. H. F.et al (2016a). Sialomes and mialomes: a systems-biology view of tick tissues and tick-host interactions.Trends Parasitol.32242–254. 10.1016/j.pt.2015.10.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  ChmelařJ.KotálJ.KopeckıJ.PedraJ. H.KotsyfakisM. (2016b). All for one and one for all on the tick-host battlefield.Trends Parasitol.32368–377. 10.1016/j.pt.2016.01.004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  ChmelařJ.KotálJ.LanghansováH.KotsyfakisM. (2017). Protease inhibitors in tick saliva: the role of serpins and cystatins in tick-host-pathogen interaction.Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.7:216. 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00216

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  ChmelařJ.OliveiraC. J.RezacovaP.FrancischettiI. M.KovarovaZ.PejlerG.et al (2011). A tick salivary protein targets cathepsin G and chymase and inhibits host inflammation and platelet aggregation.Blood117736–744. 10.1182/blood-2010-06-293241

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  ChouT.-C.TalalayP. (1977). A simple generalized equation for the analysis of multiple inhibition of Michaelis-Mentin kinetics systems.J. Biol. Chem.2526438–6442.

  • Google Scholar

• 37

  CiprandiA.de OliveiraS. K.MasudaA.HornF.TermignoniC. (2006). Boophilus microplus: its saliva contains microphilin, a small thrombin inhibitor. Exp. Parasitol.11440–46. 10.1016/j.exppara.2006.02.010

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  CollerB. S.BeerJ. H.ScudderL. E.SteinbergM. H. (1989). Collagen-platelet interactions: evidence for a direct interaction of collagen with platelet GPIa/IIa and an indirect interaction with platelet GPIIb/IIIa mediated by adhesive proteins.Blood74182–192.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  CopleyS. D. (2015). An evolutionary biochemist’s perspective on promiscuity.Trends Biochem. Sci.4072–78. 10.1016/j.tibs.2014.12.004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  CopleyS. D. (2017). Shining a light on enzyme promiscuity.Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.47167–175. 10.1016/j.sbi.2017.11.001

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  CornwallJ. W.PattonW. S. (1914). Some observations on the salivary secretion of the commoner blood-sucking insects and ticks.Indian J. Med. Res.2569–593.

  • Google Scholar

• 42

  CouvreurB.BeaufaysJ.CharonC.LahayeK.GensaleF.DenisV.et al (2008). Variability and action mechanism of a family of anticomplement proteins in Ixodes ricinus.PLoS One3:e1400. 10.1371/journal.pone.0001400

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  DaixV.SchroederH.PraetN.GeorginJ. P.ChiappinoI.GilletL.et al (2007). Ixodes ticks belonging to the Ixodes ricinus complex encode a family of anticomplement proteins. Insect Mol. Biol.16155–166. 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2006.00710.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44

  DavisT. L.SharifN. A. (2000). Pharmacological characterization of [3H]-prostaglandin E2 binding to the cloned human EP4 prostanoid receptor.Br. J. Pharmacol.1301919–1926. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703525

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45

  de CastroM. H.de KlerkD.PienaarR.LatifA. A.ReesD. J.MansB. J. (2016). De novo assembly and annotation of the salivary gland transcriptome of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus male and female ticks during blood feeding.Ticks and Tick-borne Dis.7536–548. 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2016.01.014

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  de CastroM. H.de KlerkD.PienaarR.ReesD. J. G. R.MansB. J. (2017). Sialotranscriptomics of Rhipicephalus zambeziensis reveal intricate expression profiles of secretory proteins and suggest tight temporal transcriptional regulation during blood feeding.Parasit. Vectors10:384.

  • Google Scholar

• 47

  de MeillonB. (1942). A toxin from the eggs of South African ticks.S. Afr. J. Med. Sci.7226–235.

  • Google Scholar

• 48

  DecremY.RathG.BlasioliV.CauchieP.RobertS.BeaufaysJ.et al (2009). Ir-CPI, a coagulation contact phase inhibitor from the tick Ixodes ricinus, inhibits thrombus formation without impairing hemostasis.J. Exp. Med.2062381–2395. 10.1084/jem.20091007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49

  DelvaeyeM.ConwayE. M. (2009). Coagulation and innate immune responses: can we view them separately?Blood1142367–2374. 10.1182/blood-2009-05-199208

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  DeppermannC.KubesP. (2016). Platelets and infection.Semin. Immunol.28536–545. 10.1016/j.smim.2016.10.005

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51

  DéruazM.BonvinP.SeverinI. C.JohnsonZ.KrohnS.PowerC. A.et al (2013). Evasin-4, a tick-derived chemokine-binding protein with broad selectivity can be modified for use in preclinical disease models.FEBS J.2804876–4887. 10.1111/febs.12463

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  DéruazM.FrauenschuhA.AlessandriA. L.DiasJ. M.CoelhoF. M.RussoR. C.et al (2008). Ticks produce highly selective chemokine binding proteins with antiinflammatory activity.J. Exp. Med.2052019–2031. 10.1084/jem.20072689

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53

  DharampaulS.KaufmanW. R.BelosevicM. (1993). Differential recognition of saliva antigens from the ixodid tick Amblyomma hebraeum (Acari: Ixodidae) by sera from infested and immunized rabbits.J. Med. Entomol.30262–266. 10.1093/jmedent/30.1.262

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54

  Díaz-MartínV.Manzano-RománR.OleagaA.Encinas-GrandesA.Pérez-SánchezR. (2013a). Cloning and characterization of a plasminogen-binding enolase from the saliva of the argasid tick Ornithodoros moubata.Vet. Parasitol.191301–314. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.09.019

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 55

  Díaz-MartínV.Manzano-RománR.ValeroL.OleagaA.Encinas-GrandesA.Pérez-SánchezR. (2013b). An insight into the proteome of the saliva of the argasid tick Ornithodoros moubata reveals important differences in saliva protein composition between the sexes.J. Proteomics80216–235. 10.1016/j.jprot.2013.01.015

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56

  DickinsonR. G.O’HaganJ. E.SchotzM.BinningtonK. C.HegartyM. P. (1976). Prostaglandin in the saliva of the cattle tick Boophilus microplus.Aust. J. Exp. Biol. Med. Sci.54475–486.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  DornG. W.IIDeJesusA. (1991). Human platelet aggregation and shape change are coupled to separate thromboxane A2-prostaglandin H2 receptors.Am. J. Physiol.260H327–H334.

  • Google Scholar

• 58

  DrazenJ. M.AustenK. F.LewisR. A.ClarkD. A.GotoG.MarfatA.et al (1980). Comparative airway and vascular activities of leukotrienes C-1 and D in vivo and in vitro.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.774354–4358.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 59

  EatonJ. R. O.AlenaziY.SinghK.DaviesG.Geis-AsteggianteL.KesslerB.et al (2018). The N-terminal domain of a tick evasin is critical for chemokine binding and neutralization and confers specific binding activity to other evasins.J. Biol. Chem.2936134–6146. 10.1074/jbc.RA117.000487

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60

  EhebauerM. T.MansB. J.GasparA. R.NeitzA. W. (2002). Identification of extrinsic blood coagulation pathway inhibitors from the tick Ornithodoros savignyi (Acari: Argasidae).Exp. Parasitol.101138–148. 10.1016/s0014-4894(02)00102-9

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 61

  ElginM. (2010). “Reductionism in biology: an example of biochemistry,” in The Present Situation in the Philosophy of Science. The Philosophy of Science in a European PerspectiveVol. 1ed.StadlerF. (Dortrecht: Spinger).

  • Google Scholar

• 62

  FaasM. M.SáezT.de VosP. (2017). Extracellular ATP and adenosine: the Yin and Yang in immune responses?Mol. Aspects. Med.559–19. 10.1016/j.mam.2017.01.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 63

  Ferrer-LopezP.RenestoP.SchattnerM.BassotS.LaurentP.ChignardM. (1990). Activation of human platelets by C5a-stimulated neutrophils: a role for cathepsin G.Am. J. Physiol.258C1100–C1107.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 64

  FeyerabendP. (1975). Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge.Brooklyn, NY: Verso Books, 339.

  • Google Scholar

• 65

  FigueiredoA. C.de SanctisD.PereiraP. J. (2013). The tick-derived anticoagulant madanin is processed by thrombin and factor Xa.PLoS One8:e71866. 10.1371/journal.pone.0071866

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 66

  FlowerD. R. (1996). The lipocalin protein family: structure and function.Biochem. J.3181–14. 10.1042/bj3180001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 67

  FrancischettiI. M.MansB. J.MengZ.GudderraN.VeenstraT. D.PhamV. M.et al (2008). An insight into the sialome of the soft tick, Ornithodorus parkeri.Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.381–21. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2007.09.009

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 68

  FrancischettiI. M.MatherT. N.RibeiroJ. M. (2003). Cloning of a salivary gland metalloprotease and characterization of gelatinase and fibrin(ogen)lytic activities in the saliva of the Lyme disease tick vector Ixodes scapularis.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.305869–875. 10.1016/s0006-291x(03)00857-x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 69

  FrancischettiI. M.MatherT. N.RibeiroJ. M. (2004). Penthalaris, a novel recombinant five-Kunitz tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) from the salivary gland of the tick vector of Lyme disease, Ixodes scapularis.Thromb. Haemost.91886–898. 10.1160/th03-11-0715

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 70

  FrancischettiI. M.MatherT. N.RibeiroJ. M. (2005). Tick saliva is a potent inhibitor of endothelial cell proliferation and angiogenesis.Thromb. Haemost.94167–174. 10.1160/th04-09-0566

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 71

  FrancischettiI. M.Sa-NunesA.MansB. J.SantosI. M.RibeiroJ. M. (2009). The role of saliva in tick feeding.Front. Biosci. 14:2051–2088.

  • Google Scholar

• 72

  FrancischettiI. M.ValenzuelaJ. G.AndersenJ. F.MatherT. N.RibeiroJ. M. (2002). Ixolaris, a novel recombinant tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) from the salivary gland of the tick, Ixodes scapularis: identification of factor X and factor Xa as scaffolds for the inhibition of factor VIIa/tissue factor complex.Blood993602–3612. 10.1182/blood-2001-12-0237

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 73

  FrauenschuhA.PowerC. A.DéruazM.FerreiraB. R.SilvaJ. S.TeixeiraM. M.et al (2007). Molecular cloning and characterization of a highly selective chemokine-binding protein from the tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus.J. Biol. Chem.28227250–27258. 10.1074/jbc.m704706200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 74

  FrojmovicM. M.MooneyR. F.WongT. (1994). Dynamics of platelet glycoprotein IIb-IIIa receptor expression and fibrinogen binding. I. Quantal activation of platelet subpopulations varies with adenosine diphosphate concentration.Biophys. J.672060–2068. 10.1016/s0006-3495(94)80689-7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 75

  GargR.JuncadellaI. J.RamamoorthiN.Ashish AnanthanarayananS. K.ThomasV.RincónM.et al (2006). Cutting edge: CD4 is the receptor for the tick saliva immunosuppressor, Salp15.J. Immunol.1776579–6583. 10.4049/jimmunol.177.10.6579

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 76

  GasparA. R.CrauseJ. C.NeitzA. W. (1995). Identification of anticoagulant activities in the salivary glands of the soft tick, Ornithodoros savignyi.Exp. Appl. Acarol.19117–127. 10.1007/bf00052551

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 77

  GasparA. R.JoubertA. M.CrauseJ. C.NeitzA. W. (1996). Isolation and characterization of an anticoagulant from the salivary glands of the tick, Ornithodoros savignyi (Acari: Argasidae).Exp. Appl. Acarol.20583–598. 10.1007/bf00052809

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 78

  Ghiglieri-BertezC.CristolJ. P.BonneC. (1986). High-affinity binding site for leukotriene C4 in human erythrocytes.Biochim. Biophys. Acta87997–102. 10.1016/0005-2760(86)90271-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 79

  GilesT. C.EmesR. D. (2017). Inferring function from homology.Meth. Mol. Biol.152623–40. 10.1007/978-1-4939-6613-4_2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 80

  GongH.ZhouJ.LiaoM.HattaT.HarnnoiT.UmemiyaR.et al (2007). Characterization of a carboxypeptidase inhibitor from the tick Haemaphysalis longicornis.J. Insect Physiol.531079–1087. 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2007.06.008

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 81

  GregsonJ. D. (1973). Tick Paralysis: An Appraisal of Natural and Experimental Data.Ottawa, ON: Information Division, Canada Department of Agriculture. 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2007.06.008

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 82

  GrunclováL.HornM.VancováM.SojkaD.FrantaZ.MaresM.et al (2006). Two secreted cystatins of the soft tick Ornithodoros moubata: differential expression pattern and inhibitory specificity.Biol Chem.3871635–1644.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 83

  HackenbergM.KotsyfakisM. (2018). Exosome-mediated pathogen transmission by arthropod vectors.Trends Parasitol.34549–552. 10.1016/j.pt.2018.04.001

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 84

  HackenbergM.LangenbergerD.SchwarzA.ErhartJ.KotsyfakisM. (2017). In silico target network analysis of de novo-discovered, tick saliva-specific microRNAs reveals important combinatorial effects in their interference with vertebrate host physiology.RNA231259–1269. 10.1261/rna.061168.117

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 85

  HambergM.SvenssonJ.SamuelssonB. (1975). Thromboxanes: a new group of biologically active compounds derived from prostaglandin endoperoxides.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.722994–2998. 10.1073/pnas.72.8.2994

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 86

  HaycraftJ. B. (1884). Ueber die Einwirkung eines Sekretes des officinellen Blutegels auf die Gerinnbarkeit des Blutes.Arch. für exp. Pathol. u. Pharmakol.18:209. 10.1007/bf01833843

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 87

  HaywardJ.SanchezJ.PerryA.HuangC.Rodriguez ValleM.CanalsM.et al (2018). Ticks from diverse genera encode chemokine-inhibitory evasin proteins.J. Biol. Chem.29215670–15680. 10.1074/jbc.m117.807255

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 88

  HellerC. (1858). Zur anatomie von Argas persicus.Sitzungberichte d. Kaiserl. Akad. Wien30297–326.

  • Google Scholar

• 89

  HepburnN. J.WilliamsA. S.NunnM. A.Chamberlain-BanoubJ. C.HamerJ.MorganB. P.et al (2007). In vivo characterization and therapeutic efficacy of a C5-specific inhibitor from the soft tick Ornithodoros moubata.J. Biol. Chem.2828292–8299. 10.1074/jbc.m609858200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 90

  HoeppliR.FengL. C. (1933). Experimental studies on ticks.Chin. Med. J.4729–43.

  • Google Scholar

• 91

  HoffmannA.WalsmannP.RiesenerG.PaintzM.MarkwardtF. (1991). Isolation and characterization of a thrombin inhibitor from the tick Ixodes ricinus.Pharmazie46209–212.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 92

  HornF.dos SantosP. C.TermignoniC. (2000). Boophilus microplus anticoagulant protein: an antithrombin inhibitor isolated from the cattle tick saliva. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.38468–73. 10.1006/abbi.2000.2076

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 93

  HoviusJ. W.de JongM. A.den DunnenJ.LitjensM.FikrigE.van der PollT.et al (2008). Salp15 binding to DC-SIGN inhibits cytokine expression by impairing both nucleosome remodeling and mRNA stabilization.PLoS Pathog.4:e31. 10.1371/journal.ppat.0040031

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 94

  HowellC. J. (1966). Collection of salivary gland secretion from the argasid Ornithodoros savignyi (Audouin) (1827) by the use of a pharmacological stimulant.J. S. Afr. Vet. Med. Assoc.37236–239.

  • Google Scholar

• 95

  HowellC. J.NeitzA. W. H.PotgieterD. J. J. (1975). Some toxic and chemical properties of the oral secretion of the sand tampan, Ornithodoros savignyi (Audouin) (1827). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res.4399–102.

  • Google Scholar

• 96

  HuG.DrescherK. M.ChenX. M. (2012). Exosomal miRNAs: biological properties and therapeutic potential.Front. Genet.3:56. 10.3389/fgene.2012.00056

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 97

  IbelliA. M.KimT. K.HillC. C.LewisL. A.BakshiM.MillerS.et al (2014). A blood meal-induced Ixodes scapularis tick saliva serpin inhibits trypsin and thrombin, and interferes with platelet aggregation and blood clotting.Int. J. Parasitol.44369–379. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2014.01.010

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 98

  IbrahimM. A.GhazyA. H.MaharemT. M.KhalilM. I. (2001a). Factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor from the nymphs of the camel tick Hyalomma dromedarii.Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol.130501–512. 10.1016/s1096-4959(01)00459-6

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 99

  IbrahimM. A.GhazyA. H.MaharemT.KhalilM. (2001b). Isolation and properties of two forms of thrombin inhibitor from the nymphs of the camel tick Hyalomma dromedarii (Acari: Ixodidae).Exp. Appl. Acarol.25675–698.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 100

  IbrahimM. A.MasoudH. M. M. (2018). Thrombin inhibitor from the salivary gland of the camel tick Hyalomma dromedarii.Exp. Appl. Acarol.7485–97. 10.1007/s10493-017-0196-9

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 101

  ImamuraS.da Silva Vaz JuniorI.SuginoM.OhashiK.OnumaM. (2005). A serine protease inhibitor (serpin) from Haemaphysalis longicornis as an anti-tick vaccine.Vaccine231301–1311. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.08.041

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 102

  InokumaH.KempD. H.WilladsenP. (1994). Comparison of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in salivary gland of Boophilus microplus, Haemaphysalis longicornis and Ixodes holocyclus, and quantification of PGE2 in saliva, hemolymph, ovary and gut of B. microplus.J. Vet. Med. Sci.561217–1218. 10.1292/jvms.56.1217

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 103

  IqbalA.GoldfederM. B.Marques-PortoR.AsifH.SouzaJ. G.FariaF.et al (2017). Revisiting antithrombotic therapeutics; sculptin, a novel specific, competitive, reversible, scissile and tight binding inhibitor of thrombin.Sci. Rep.7:1431. 10.1038/s41598-017-01486-w

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 104

  IwanagaS.IsawaH.YudaM. (2014). Horizontal gene transfer of a vertebrate vasodilatory hormone into ticks.Nature Comm.5:3373. 10.1038/ncomms4373

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 105

  IwanagaS.OkadaM.IsawaH.MoritaA.YudaM.ChinzeiY. (2003). Identification and characterization of novel salivary thrombin inhibitors from the ixodidae tick, Haemaphysalis longicornis.Eur. J. Biochem.2701926–1934. 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03560.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 106

  IyerJ. K.KohC. Y.KazimirovaM.RollerL.JobichenC.SwaminathanK.et al (2017). Avathrin: a novel thrombin inhibitor derived from a multicopy precursor in the salivary glands of the ixodid tick, Amblyomma variegatum.FASEB J.312981–2995. 10.1096/fj.201601216R

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 107

  JablonkaW.KotsyfakisM.MizuriniD. M.MonteiroR. Q.LukszoJ.DrakeS. K.et al (2015). Identification and mechanistic analysis of a novel tick-derived inhibitor of Thrombin.PLoS One10:e0133991. 10.1371/journal.pone.0133991

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 108

  JoreM. M.JohnsonS.SheppardD.BarberN. M.LiY. I.NunnM. A.et al (2016). Structural basis for therapeutic inhibition of complement C5.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.23378–386. 10.1038/nsmb.3196

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 109

  JungS. M.MoroiM. (1998). Platelets interact with soluble and insoluble collagens through characteristically different reactions.J. Biol. Chem.27314827–14837. 10.1074/jbc.273.24.14827

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 110

  KarczewskiJ.EndrisR.ConnollyT. M. (1994). Disagregin is a fibrinogen receptor antagonist lacking the Arg-Gly-Asp sequence from the tick, Ornithodoros moubata.J. Biol. Chem.2696702–6708.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 111

  KarczewskiJ.WaxmanL.EndrisR. G.ConnollyT. M. (1995). An inhibitor from the argasid tick Ornithodoros moubata of cell adhesion to collagen.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.208532–541. 10.1006/bbrc.1995.1371

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 112

  KatoN.IwanagaS.OkayamaT.IsawaH.YudaM.ChinzeiY. (2005). Identification and characterization of the plasma kallikrein-kinin system inhibitor, haemaphysalin, from hard tick, Haemaphysalis longicornis.Thromb. Haemost.93359–367. 10.1160/th04-05-0319

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 113

  KazimírováM.JancinováV.PetríkováM.TakácP.LabudaM.NosálR. (2002). An inhibitor of thrombin-stimulated blood platelet aggregation from the salivary glands of the hard tick Amblyomma variegatum (Acari: Ixodidae).Exp. Appl. Acarol.2897–105. 10.1007/978-94-017-3526-1_7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 114

  KellerP. M.WaxmanL.ArnoldB. A.SchultzL. D.CondraC.ConnollyT. M. (1993). Cloning of the cDNA and expression of moubatin, an inhibitor of platelet aggregation.J. Biol. Chem.2685450–5456.

  • Google Scholar

• 115

  KempD. H.StoneB. F.BinningtonK. C. (1982). “Tick attachment and feeding: role of the mouthparts, feeding apparatus, salivary gland secretions and the host response,” in Physiology of Ticks, edsObenchainF. D.GalunR. (Oxford: Pergamon Press).

  • Google Scholar

• 116

  KimT. K.TirloniL.PintoA. F.MorescoJ.YatesJ. R.IIIda Silva VazI.Jr.et al (2017). Ixodes scapularis tick saliva proteins sequentially secreted every 24 h during blood feeding. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.10:e0004323. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004323

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 117

  KimT. K.TirloniL.RadulovicZ.LewisL.BakshiM.HillC.et al (2015). Conserved Amblyomma americanum tick serpin19, an inhibitor of blood clotting factors Xa and XIa, trypsin and plasmin, has anti-haemostatic functions.Int. J. Parasitol.45613–627. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2015.03.009

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 118

  KiszewskiA. E.MatuschkaF. R.SpielmanA. (2001). Mating strategies and spermiogenesis in ixodid ticks.Annu. Rev. Entomol.46167–182.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 119

  KohC. Y.KazimirovaM.TrimnellA.TakacP.LabudaM.NuttallP. A.et al (2007). Variegin, a novel fast and tight binding thrombin inhibitor from the tropical bont tick.J. Biol. Chem.28229101–29113. 10.1074/jbc.m705600200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 120

  KotálJ.StergiouN.BušaM.ChlastákováA.BeránkováZ.ŘezáčováP.et al (2019). The structure and function of Iristatin, a novel immunosuppressive tick salivary cystatin.Cell Mol. Life Sci.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 121

  KotsyfakisM.KarimS.AndersenJ. F.MatherT. N.RibeiroJ. M. (2007). Selective cysteine protease inhibition contributes to blood-feeding success of the tick Ixodes scapularis.J. Biol. Chem.28229256–29263. 10.1074/jbc.m703143200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 122

  KotsyfakisM.Sá-NunesA.FrancischettiI. M.MatherT. N.AndersenJ. F.RibeiroJ. M. (2006). Antiinflammatory and immunosuppressive activity of sialostatin L, a salivary cystatin from the tick Ixodes scapularis.J. Biol. Chem.28126298–26307. 10.1074/jbc.m513010200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 123

  KrilisS.LewisR. A.CoreyE. J.AustenK. F. (1983). Specific receptors for leukotriene C4 on a smooth muscle cell line.J. Clin. Invest.721516–1519. 10.1172/jci111109

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 124

  KröberT.GeurinP. M. (2007). In vitro feeding assays for hard ticks.Trends Parasitol.23445–449. 10.1016/j.pt.2007.07.010

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 125

  KuhnN.SchmidtC. Q.SchlapschyM.SkerraA. (2016). PASylated Coversin, a C5-specific complement inhibitor with extended pharmacokinetics, shows enhanced anti-hemolytic activity in vitro.Bioconjug. Chem.272359–2371. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00369

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 126

  KuriyanJ.KonfortiB.WemmerD. (2013). The Molecules of Life: Physical and Chemical Principles.Routledge: Garland Science, Taylor & Francis Group, 1008.

  • Google Scholar

• 127

  LawJ. H.RibeiroJ. M. C.WellsM. A. (1992). Biochemical insights derived from insect diversity.Ann. Rev. Biochem.6487–111. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.61.1.87

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 128

  LeboulleG.CrippaM.DecremY.MejriN.BrossardM.BollenA.et al (2002). Characterization of a novel salivary immunosuppressive protein from Ixodes ricinus ticks.J. Biol. Chem.27710083–10089.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 129

  LewisR. A.Mencia-HuertaJ. M.SobermanR. J.HooverD.MarfatA.CoreyE. J.et al (1982). Radioimmunoassay for leukotriene B4.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.797904–7908.

  • Google Scholar

• 130

  LeydigF. (1855). Zum feineren Bau der Arthropoden.Müller’s Archiv. f. Anat. Physiol. u. wiss. Med.1855376–480.

  • Google Scholar

• 131

  LimoM. K.VoigtW. P.Tumbo-OeriA. G.NjoguR. M.ole-MoiYoiO. K. (1991). Purification and characterization of an anticoagulant from the salivary glands of the ixodid tick Rhipicephalus appendiculatus.Exp. Parasitol.72418–429. 10.1016/0014-4894(91)90088-e

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 132

  LiuY. H.XuC. H.LiuZ. G.LiangJ. G.LaiR. (2005). Isolation and purification of an inhibitor on platelet aggregation from Ixodes sinensis.Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi23424–427.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 133

  Macedo-RibeiroS.AlmeidaC.CalistoB. M.FriedrichT.MenteleR.StürzebecherJ.et al (2008). Isolation, cloning and structural characterisation of boophilin, a multifunctional Kunitz-type proteinase inhibitor from the cattle tick.PLoS One3:e1624. 10.1371/journal.pone.0001624

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 134

  MacGlashanD.Jr. (2003). Histamine: a mediator of inflammation.J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.112S53–S59.

  • Google Scholar

• 135

  MacGregorI. R.ProwseC. V. (1983). Tissue plasminogen activator in human plasma measured by radioimmunoassay.Thromb. Res.31461–474. 10.1016/0049-3848(83)90410-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 136

  MacphersonA.LiuX.DediN.KennedyJ.CarringtonB.DurrantO.et al (2018). The rational design of affinity-attenuated OmCI for the purification of complement C5.J. Biol. Chem.29314112–14121. 10.1074/jbc.RA118.004043

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 137

  MansB. J. (1997). Biochemical Properties of a Platelet Aggregation Inhibitor of the tick, Ornithodoros savignyi. . 10.1074/jbc.ra118.004043

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 138

  MansB. J. (2005). Tick histamine-binding proteins and related lipocalins: potential as therapeutic agents.Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs61131–1135.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 139

  MansB. J. (2011). Evolution of vertebrate hemostatic and inflammatory control mechanisms in blood-feeding arthropods.J. Innate Immun.341–51. 10.1159/000321599

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 140

  MansB. J. (2016). “Glandular matrices and secretions: blood- feeding arthropods,” in Extracellular Composite Matrices in Arthropods, edsCohenE.MoussianB. (Switzerland: Springer), 625–688. 10.1007/978-3-319-40740-1_17

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 141

  MansB. J.AndersenJ. F.SchwanT. G.RibeiroJ. M. (2008a). Characterization of anti-hemostatic factors in the argasid, Argas monolakensis: implications for the evolution of blood-feeding in the soft tick family.Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.3822–41. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2007.09.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 142

  MansB. J.RibeiroJ. M.AndersenJ. F. (2008b). Structure, function, and evolution of biogenic amine-binding proteins in soft ticks.J. Biol. Chem.28318721–18733. 10.1074/jbc.M800188200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 143

  MansB. J.AndersenJ. F.FrancischettiI. M.ValenzuelaJ. G.SchwanT. G.PhamV. M.et al (2008c). Comparative sialomics between hard and soft ticks: implications for the evolution of blood-feeding behavior.Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.3842–58. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2007.09.003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 144

  MansB. J.CoetzeeJ.LouwA. I.GasparA. R.NeitzA. W. (2000). Disaggregation of aggregated platelets by apyrase from the tick, Ornithodoros savignyi (Acari: Argasidae).Exp. Appl. Acarol.24271–282.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 145

  MansB. J.de CastroM. H.PienaarR.de KlerkD.GavenP.GenuS.et al (2016). Ancestral reconstruction of tick lineages.Ticks Tick Borne Dis.7509–535. 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2016.02.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 146

  MansB. J.FeatherstonJ.de CastroM. H.PienaarR. (2017). Gene duplication and protein evolution in tick-host interactions.Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol.7:413. 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00413

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 147

  MansB. J.GasparA. R.LouwA. I.NeitzA. W. (1998a). Apyrase activity and platelet aggregation inhibitors in the tick Ornithodoros savignyi (Acari: Argasidae).Exp. Appl. Acarol.22353–366.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 148

  MansB. J.GasperA. R.LouwA. I.NeitzA. W. (1998b). Purification and characterization of apyrase from the tick, Ornithodoros savignyi.Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol.120617–624. 10.1016/s0305-0491(98)10061-5

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 149

  MansB. J.VenterJ. D.VreyP. J.LouwA. I.NeitzA. W. (2001). Identification of putative proteins involved in granule biogenesis of tick salivary glands.Electrophoresis221739–1746. 10.1002/1522-2683(200105)22%3A9%3C1739%3A%3Aaid-elps1739%3E3.0.co%3B2-7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 150

  MansB. J.LouwA. I.NeitzA. W. (2002a). Disaggregation of aggregated platelets by savignygrin, a αIIbβ3 antagonist from Ornithodoros savignyi.Exp. Appl. Acarol.27231–239.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 151

  MansB. J.LouwA. I.NeitzA. W. (2002b). Savignygrin, a platelet aggregation inhibitor from the soft tick Ornithodoros savignyi, presents the RGD integrin recognition motif on the Kunitz-BPTI fold.J. Biol. Chem.27721371–22378.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 152

  MansB. J.LouwA. I.NeitzA. W. (2003a). The influence of tick behavior, biotope and host specificity on concerted evolution of the platelet aggregation inhibitor savignygrin, from the soft tick Ornithodoros savignyi.Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.33623–629. 10.1016/s0965-1748(03)00047-x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 153

  MansB. J.LouwA. I.NeitzA. W. (2003b). The major tick salivary gland proteins and toxins from the soft tick, Ornithodoros savignyi, are part of the tick Lipocalin family: implications for the origins of tick toxicoses.Mol. Biol. Evol.201158–1167. 10.1093/molbev/msg126

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 154

  MansB. J.NeitzA. W. (2004a). Adaptation of ticks to a blood-feeding environment: evolution from a functional perspective.Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.341–17. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2003.09.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 155

  MansB. J.NeitzA. W. (2004b). Molecular crowding as a mechanism for tick secretory granule biogenesis.Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.341187–1193. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2004.07.007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 156

  MansB. J.NeitzA. W. (2004c). The mechanism of αIIbβ3 antagonism by savignygrin and its implications for the evolution of anti-hemostatic strategies in soft ticks.Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.34573–584. 10.1016/s0965-1748(04)00038-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 157

  MansB. J.GotheR.NeitzA. W. (2004a). Biochemical perspectives on paralysis and other forms of toxicoses caused by ticks.Parasitology129S95–S111.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 158

  MansB. J.VenterJ. D.CoonsL. B.LouwA. I.NeitzA. W. H. (2004b). A reassessment of argasid tick salivary gland ultrastructure from an immuno-cytochemical perspective.Exp. Appl. Acarol.33119–129. 10.1023/b

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 159

  MansB. J.RibeiroJ. M. (2008a). A novel clade of cysteinyl leukotriene scavengers in soft ticks.Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.38862–870. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2008.06.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 160

  MansB. J.RibeiroJ. M. (2008b). Function, mechanism and evolution of the moubatin-clade of soft tick lipocalins.Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.38841–852. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2008.06.007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 161

  McSwainJ. L.EssenbergR. C.SauerJ. R. (1982). Protein changes in the salivary glands of the female lone star tick, Amblyomma americanum, during feeding.J. Parasitol.68100–106.

  • Google Scholar

• 162

  MonteiroR. Q.RezaieA. R.RibeiroJ. M.FrancischettiI. M. (2005). Ixolaris: a factor Xa heparin-binding exosite inhibitor.Biochem. J.387871–877. 10.1042/bj20041738

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 163

  MooreJ. E.Jr.BrookB. S.NibbsR. J. B. (2018). Chemokine transport dynamics and emerging recognition of their role in immune function.Curr. Opin. Biomed. Eng.590–95. 10.1016/j.cobme.2018.03.001

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 164

  MotoyashikiT.TuA. T.AzimovD. A.IbragimK. (2003). Isolation of anticoagulant from the venom of tick, Boophilus calcaratus, from Uzbekistan.Thromb. Res.110235–241. 10.1016/s0049-3848(03)00409-2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 165

  MulengaA.KimT.IbelliA. M. (2013). Amblyomma americanum tick saliva serine protease inhibitor 6 is a cross-class inhibitor of serine proteases and papain-like cysteine proteases that delays plasma clotting and inhibits platelet aggregation. Insect Mol. Biol.22306–319. 10.1111/imb.12024

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 166

  MulengaA.MacalusoK. R.SimserJ. A.AzadA. F. (2003). The American dog tick, Dermacentor variabilis, encodes a functional histamine release factor homolog.Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.33911–919. 10.1016/s0965-1748(03)00097-3

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 167

  NakajimaC.ImamuraS.KonnaiS.YamadaS.NishikadoH.OhashiK.et al (2006). A novel gene encoding a thrombin inhibitory protein in a cDNA library from Haemaphysalis longicornis salivary gland.J. Vet. Med Sci.68447–452. 10.1292/jvms.68.447

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 168

  NarasimhanS.KoskiR. A.BeaulieuB.AndersonJ. F.RamamoorthiN.KantorF.et al (2002). A novel family of anticoagulants from the saliva of Ixodes scapularis.Insect Mol. Biol.11641–650. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2002.00375.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 169

  NeelakantaG.SultanaH.SonenshineD. E.AndersenJ. F. (2018). Identification and characterization of a histamine-binding lipocalin-like molecule from the relapsing fever tick Ornithodoros turicata.Insect Mol. Biol.27177–187. 10.1111/imb.12362

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 170

  NeitzA. W.HowellC. J.PotgieterD. J.BezuidenhoutJ. D. (1978). Proteins and free amino acids in the salivary secretion and haemolymph of the tick Amblyomma hebraeum.Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res.45235–240.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 171

  NeitzA. W.ProzeskyL.BezuidenhoutJ. D.PutterillJ. F.PotgieterD. J. (1981). An investigation into the toxic principle in eggs of the tick Amblyomma hebraeum.Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res.48109–117.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 172

  NeitzA. W. H.HowellC. J.PotgieterD. J. J. (1969). Purification of the toxic component in the oral secretion of the sand tampan Ornithodoros savignyi (Audouin) (1827). J. S. Afr. Chem. Ind.22142–149.

  • Google Scholar

• 173

  NielsenH. (2017). Predicting secretory proteins with SignalP.Methods Mol. Biol.161159–73. 10.1007/978-1-4939-7015-5_6

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 174

  NienaberJ.GasparA. R.NeitzA. W. (1999). Savignin, a potent thrombin inhibitor isolated from the salivary glands of the tick Ornithodoros savignyi (Acari: Argasidae).Exp. Parasitol.9382–91. 10.1006/expr.1999.4448

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 175

  NunnM. A.SharmaA.PaesenG. C.AdamsonS.LissinaO.WillisA. C.et al (2005). Complement inhibitor of C5 activation from the soft tick Ornithodoros moubata.J. Immunol.1742084–2091. 10.4049/jimmunol.174.4.2084

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 176

  NuttallG. H. F.StricklandC. (1908). On the presence of an anticoagulin in the salivary glands and intestines of Argas persicus.Parasitology1302–310. 10.1017/s0031182000003590

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 177

  NuttallG. H. F.WarburtonC.CooperW. F.RobinsonL. E. (1908). Ticks. A Monograph of the Ixodoidae. Part I: The Argasidae.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/s0031182000003590

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 178

  NuttallP. A. (2019). Wonders of tick saliva.Ticks Tick Borne Dis.10470–481. 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2018.11.005

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 179

  NuttallP. A.TrimnellA. R.KazimirovaM.LabudaM. (2006). Exposed and concealed antigens as vaccine targets for controlling ticks and tick-borne diseases.Parasite Immunol.28155–163. 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2006.00806.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 180

  Oleaga-PérezA.Pérez-SánchezR.AstigarragaA.Encinas-GrandesA. (1994). Detection of pig farms with Ornithodoros erraticus by pig serology. Elimination of non-specific reactions by carbohydrate epitopes of salivary antigens.Vet. Parasitol.5297–111. 10.1016/0304-4017(94)90040-x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 181

  OliveiraC. J.AnatrielloE.de Miranda-SantosI. K.FrancischettiI. M.Sá-NunesA.FerreiraB. R.et al (2013). Proteome of Rhipicephalus sanguineus tick saliva induced by the secretagogues pilocarpine and dopamine.Ticks Tick Borne Dis.4469–477. 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2013.05.001

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 182

  PackhamM. A.RandM. L. (2011). Historical perspective on ADP-induced platelet activation.Purinergic. Signal.7283–292. 10.1007/s11302-011-9227-x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 183

  PaesenG. C.AdamsP. L.HarlosK.NuttallP. A.StuartD. I. (1999). Tick histamine-binding proteins: isolation, cloning, and three-dimensional structure.Mol. Cell3661–671. 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80359-7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 184

  PaesenG. C.AdamsP. L.NuttallP. A.StuartD. L. (2000). Tick histamine-binding proteins: lipocalins with a second binding cavity.Biochim. Biophys. Acta148292–101. 10.1016/s0167-4838(00)00168-0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 185

  PaesenG. C.SieboldC.DallasM. L.PeersC.HarlosC.NuttallP. A.et al (2009). An ion-channel modulator from the saliva of the brown ear tick has a highly modified Kunitz/BPTI structure.J. Mol. Biol.389734–747. 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.04.045

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 186

  PaesenG. C.SieboldC.HarlosK.PeaceyM. F.NuttallP. A.StuartD. I. (2007). A tick protein with a modified Kunitz fold inhibits human tryptase.J. Mol. Biol.3681172–1186. 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.03.011

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 187

  PariziL. F.GithakaN. W.AcevedoC.BenavidesU.SeixasA.LogulloC.et al (2013). Sequence characterization and immunogenicity of cystatins from the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus.Ticks Tick Borne Dis.4492–499. 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2013.06.005

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 188

  PernerJ.KropáčkováS.KopáčekP.RibeiroJ. M. C. (2018). Sialome diversity of ticks revealed by RNAseq of single tick salivary glands.PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.12:e0006410. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006410

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 189

  PervaizS.BrewK. (1987). Homology and structure-function correlations between alpha 1-acid glycoprotein and serum retinol-binding protein and its relatives.FASEB J.1209–214. 10.1096/fasebj.1.3.3622999

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 190

  PetersenL. J. (1997). Quantitative measurement of extracellular histamine concentrations in intact human skin in vivo by the microdialysis technique: methodological aspects.Allergy52547–555. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1997.tb02598.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 191

  PichuS.RibeiroJ. M.MatherT. N.FrancischettiI. M. (2014). Purification of a serine protease and evidence for a protein C activator from the saliva of the tick, Ixodes scapularis.Toxicon7732–39. 10.1016/j.toxicon.2013.10.025

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 192

  PienaarR.NeitzA. W. H.MansB. J. (2018). Tick paralysis: solving an Enigma.Vet. Sci.5:53. 10.3390/vetsci5020053

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 193

  PlattE. J.WehrlyK.KuhmannS. E.ChesebroB.KabatD. (1998). Effects of CCR5 and CD4 cell surface concentrations on infections by macrophagetropic isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1.J. Virol.722855–2864.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 194

  PrestonS. G.MajtánJ.KouremenouC.RysnikO.BurgerL. F.Cabezas CruzA.et al (2013). Novel immunomodulators from hard ticks selectively reprogramme human dendritic cell responses.PLoS Pathog.9:e1003450. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003450

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 195

  PrevotP. P.AdamB.BoudjeltiaK. Z.BrossardM.LinsL.CauchieP.et al (2006). Anti-hemostatic effects of a serpin from the saliva of the tick Ixodes ricinus.J. Biol. Chem.28126361–26369. 10.1074/jbc.m604197200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 196

  PrevotP. P.BeschinA.LinsL.BeaufaysJ.GrosjeanA.BruysL.et al (2009). Exosites mediate the anti-inflammatory effects of a multifunctional serpin from the saliva of the tick Ixodes ricinus.FEBS J.2763235–3246. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07038.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 197

  PriéS.GuillemetteG.BoulayG.BorgeatP.SiroisP. (1995). Leukotriene C4 receptors on guinea pig tracheocytes.J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.275312–318.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 198

  Radulović,ŽM.MulengaA. (2017). Heparan sulfate/heparin glycosaminoglycan binding alters inhibitory profile and enhances anticoagulant function of conserved Amblyomma americanum tick saliva serpin 19.Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.801–10. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2016.11.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 199

  RangelC. K.PariziL. F.SabadinG. A.CostaE. P.RomeiroN. C.IsezakiM.et al (2017). Molecular and structural characterization of novel cystatins from the taiga tick Ixodes persulcatus.Ticks Tick Borne Dis.8432–441. 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2017.01.007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 200

  RawalN.PangburnM. (2001). Formation of high-affinity C5 convertases of the alternative pathway of complement.J. Immunol.1662635–2642. 10.4049/jimmunol.166.4.2635

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 201

  RawalN.PangburnM. K. (2003). Formation of high affinity C5 convertase of the classical pathway of complement.J. Biol. Chem.27838476–38483. 10.1074/jbc.m307017200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 202

  RibeiroJ. M. (1987). Ixodes dammini: salivary anti-complement activity. Exp. Parasitol.64347–353. 10.1016/0014-4894(87)90046-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 203

  RibeiroJ. M.ArcàB. (2009). From sialomes to the sialoverse: an insight into salivary potion of blood-feeding insects.Adv. In. Insect Physiol.3759–118. 10.1371/journal.pone.0044612

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 204

  RibeiroJ. M.EvansP. M.MacSwainJ. L.SauerJ. (1992). Amblyomma americanum: characterization of salivary prostaglandins E2 and F2 alpha by RP-HPLC/bioassay and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.Exp. Parasitol.74112–116. 10.1016/0014-4894(92)90145-z

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 205

  RibeiroJ. M.MatherT. N. (1998). Ixodes scapularis: salivary kininase activity is a metallo dipeptidyl carboxypeptidase. Exp. Parasitol.89213–221. 10.1006/expr.1998.4296

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 206

  RibeiroJ. M. C. (1995). How ticks make a living.Parasitol. Today1191–93. 10.1016/0169-4758(95)80162-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 207

  RibeiroJ. M. C.EndrisT. M.EndrisR. (1991). Saliva of the soft tick Ornithodoros moubata, contains anti-platelet and apyrase activity.Comp. Biochem. Physiol.100109–112. 10.1016/0300-9629(91)90190-n

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 208

  RibeiroJ. M. C.MakoulG.LevineJ.RobinsonD.SpielmanA. (1985). Antihemostatic, antiinflammatory, and immunosuppressive properties of the saliva of a tick Ixodes dammini.J. Exp. Med.161332–344. 10.1084/jem.161.2.332

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 209

  RibeiroJ. M. C.SpielmanA. (1986). Ixodes dammini: salivary anaphylatoxin inactivating activity.Exp. Parasitol.62292–297. 10.1016/0014-4894(86)90034-2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 210

  RiekR. F. (1957). Studies on the reactions of animals to infestation with ticks.Aust. J. Agric. Res.8215–223.

  • Google Scholar

• 211

  RiekR. F. (1959). Studies on the reactions of animals to infestation with ticks.Aust. J. Agric. Res.10604–613.

  • Google Scholar

• 212

  Rodriguez-ValleM.MoolhuijzenP.BarreroR. A.OngC. T.BuschG.KarbanowiczT.et al (2017). Transcriptome and toxin family analysis of the paralysis tick, Ixodes holocyclus.Int. J. Parasitol.4871–82. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2017.07.007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 213

  Rodriguez-ValleM.XuT.KurscheidS.Lew-TaborA. E. (2015). Rhipicephalus microplus serine protease inhibitor family: annotation, expression and functional characterisation assessment. Parasit. Vectors8:7. 10.1186/s13071-014-0605-4

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 214

  RossI. C. (1926). An experimental study of tick paralysis in Australia.Parasitology18410–429. 10.1186/s13071-018-3061-8

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 215

  RoversiP.JohnsonS.PrestonS. G.NunnM. A.PaesenG. C.AustynJ. M.et al (2017). Structural basis of cholesterol binding by a novel clade of dendritic cell modulators from ticks.Sci. Rep.7:16057. 10.1038/s41598-017-16413-2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 216

  RoversiP.LissinaO.JohnsonS.AhmatN.PaesenG. C.PlossK.et al (2007). The structure of OMCI, a novel lipocalin inhibitor of the complement system.J. Mol. Biol.369784–793. 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.03.064

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 217

  RoversiP.RyffelB.TogbeD.MailletI.TeixeiraM.AhmatN.et al (2013). Bifunctional lipocalin ameliorates murine immune complex-induced acute lung injury.J. Biol. Chem.28818789–18802. 10.1074/jbc.M112.420331

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 218

  SabbataniL. (1899). Fermento anticoagulante del’ Ixodes ricinus.Arch. Ital. Biol.3137–53.

  • Google Scholar

• 219

  SadikC. D.MiyabeY.SezinT.LusterA. D. (2018). The critical role of C5a as an initiator of neutrophil-mediated autoimmune inflammation of the joint and skin.Semin. Immunol.3721–29. 10.1016/j.smim.2018.03.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 220

  SalátJ.PaesenG. C.RezácováP.KotsyfakisM.KovárováZ.SandaM.et al (2010). Crystal structure and functional characterization of an immunomodulatory salivary cystatin from the soft tick Ornithodoros moubata.Biochem. J.429103–112. 10.1042/BJ20100280

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 221

  SangamnatdejS.PaesenG. C.SlovakM.NuttallP. A. (2002). A high affinity serotonin- and histamine-binding lipocalin from tick saliva.Insect Mol. Biol.1179–86. 10.1046/j.0962-1075.2001.00311.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 222

  Sant’Anna AzzoliniS.SasakiS. D.TorquatoR. J.AndreottiR.AndreottiE.TanakaA. S. (2003). Rhipicephalus sanguineus trypsin inhibitors present in the tick larvae: isolation, characterization, and partial primary structure determination. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.417176–182. 10.1016/s0003-9861(03)00344-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 223

  SasagawaM.SatohT.TakemotoA.HasegawaT.SuzukiE.ArakawaM. (1994). Blood levels of leukotrienes (LTC4, D4, E4, B4) in asthmatic patients during attack and remission.Arerugi4328–36.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 224

  SchroederH.DaixV.GilletL.RenauldJ. C.VanderplasschenA. (2007). The paralogous salivary anti-complement proteins IRAC I and IRAC II encoded by Ixodes ricinus ticks have broad and complementary inhibitory activities against the complement of different host species.Microbes Infect.9247–250. 10.1016/j.micinf.2006.10.020

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 225

  SchuijtT. J.BakhtiariK.DaffreS.DeponteK.WieldersS. J.MarquartJ. A.et al (2013). Factor Xa activation of factor V is of paramount importance in initiating the coagulation system: lessons from a tick salivary protein.Circulation128254–266. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003191

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 226

  SchuijtT. J.NarasimhanS.DaffreS.DePonteK.HoviusJ. W.Van’t VeerC.et al (2011). Identification and characterization of Ixodes scapularis antigens that elicit tick immunity using yeast surface display.PLoS One6:e15926. 10.1371/journal.pone.0015926

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 227

  SchwarzA.TenzerS.HackenbergM.ErhartJ.Gerhold-AyA.MazurJ.et al (2014). A systems level analysis reveals transcriptomic and proteomic complexity in Ixodes ricinus midgut and salivary glands during early attachment and feeding.Mol. Cell. Proteomics132725–2735. 10.1074/mcp.M114.039289

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 228

  ScottE. (1921). Hume and Hovell’s journey to Port Phillip.Roy. Aust. Hist. Soc.7289–380.

  • Google Scholar

• 229

  SearsD. W.ThompsonS. E.SaxonS. R. (2007). Reversible ligand binding reactions: why do biochemistry students have trouble connecting the dots?Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ.35105–118. 10.1002/bmb.29

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 230

  SinghK.DaviesG.AlenaziY.EatonJ. R. O.KawamuraA.BhattacharyaS. (2017). Yeast surface display identifies a family of evasins from ticks with novel polyvalent CC chemokine-binding activities.Sci. Rep.7:4267. 10.1038/s41598-017-04378-1

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 231

  SmithR. D.EngdahlA. L.DunbarJ. B.Jr.CarlsonH. A. (2012). Biophysical limits of protein-ligand binding.J. Chem. Inf. Model.522098–2106. 10.1021/ci200612f

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 232

  SoaresC. A.LimaC. M.DolanM. C.PiesmanJ.BeardC. B.ZeidnerN. S. (2005). Capillary feeding of specific dsRNA induces silencing of the Isac gene in nymphal Ixodes scapularis ticks.Insect Mol. Biol.14443–452. 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2005.00575.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 233

  SoaresT. S.WatanabeR. M.Tanaka-AzevedoA. M.TorquatoR. J.LuS.FigueiredoA. C.et al (2012). Expression and functional characterization of Boophilin, a thrombin inhibitor from Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus midgut.Vet. Parasitol.187521–528. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.01.027

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 234

  SokolC. L.LusterA. D. (2015). The chemokine system in innate immunity.Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.7:a016303. 10.1101/cshperspect.a016303

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 235

  SonenshineD. E. (2004). Pheromones and other semiochemicals of ticks and their use in tick control.Parasitology129S405–S425.

  • Google Scholar

• 236

  StutzerC.MansB. J.GasparA. R.NeitzA. W.Maritz-OlivierC. (2009). Ornithodoros savignyi: soft tick apyrase belongs to the 5’-nucleotidase family. Exp. Parasitol.122318–327. 10.1016/j.exppara.2009.04.007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 237

  TanakaA. S.AndreottiR.GomesA.TorquatoR. J.SampaioM. U.SampaioC. A. (1999). A double headed serine proteinase inhibitor–human plasma kallikrein and elastase inhibitor–from Boophilus microplus larvae.Immunopharmacology45171–177. 10.1016/s0162-3109(99)00074-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 238

  TangJ.FangY.HanY.BaiX.YanX.ZhangY.et al (2015). YY-39, a tick anti-thrombosis peptide containing RGD domain.Peptides6899–104. 10.1016/j.peptides.2014.08.008

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 239

  TatchellR. J. (1967). A modified method for obtaining tick oral secretion.J. Parasitol.531106–1107.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 240

  TatchellR. J.MoorhouseD. E. (1968). The feeding processes of the cattle tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini). II. The sequence of host-tissue changes.Parasitology58441–459.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 241

  TirloniL.IslamM. S.KimT. K.DiedrichJ. K.YatesJ. R.IIIPintoA. F.et al (2015). Saliva from nymph and adult females of Haemaphysalis longicornis: a proteomic study.Parasit. Vectors8:338. 10.1186/s13071-015-0918-y

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 242

  TirloniL.ReckJ.TerraR. M.MartinsJ. R.MulengaA.ShermanN. E.et al (2014). Proteomic analysis of cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus saliva: a comparison between partially and fully engorged females.PLoS One9:e94831. 10.1371/journal.pone.0094831

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 243

  TysonK.ElkinsC.PattersonH.FikrigE.de SilvaA. (2007). Biochemical and functional characterization of Salp20, an Ixodes scapularis tick salivary protein that inhibits the complement pathway.Insect Mol. Biol.16469–479. 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2007.00742.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 244

  TysonK. R.ElkinsC.de SilvaA. M. (2008). A novel mechanism of complement inhibition unmasked by a tick salivary protein that binds to properdin.J. Immunol.1803964–3968. 10.4049/jimmunol.180.6.3964

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 245

  UhlírJ.GrubhofferL.BorskıI.DusbábekF. (1994). Antigens and glycoproteins of larvae, nymphs and adults of the tick Ixodes ricinus.Med. Vet. Entomol.8141–150. 10.1111/j.1365-2915.1994.tb00154.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 246

  ValdésJ. J.Cabezas-CruzA.SimaR.ButterillP. T.RůžekD.NuttallP. A. (2016). Substrate prediction of Ixodes ricinus salivary lipocalins differentially expressed during Borrelia afzelii infection.Sci. Rep.6:32372. 10.1038/srep32372

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 247

  ValdésJ. J.SchwarzA.Cabeza de VacaI.CalvoE.PedraJ. H.GuallarV.et al (2013). Tryptogalinin is a tick Kunitz serine protease inhibitor with a unique intrinsic disorder.PLoS One8:e62562. 10.1371/journal.pone.0062562

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 248

  ValenzuelaJ. G.CharlabR.MatherT. N.RibeiroJ. M. (2000). Purification, cloning, and expression of a novel salivary anticomplement protein from the tick, Ixodes scapularis.J. Biol. Chem.27518717–18723. 10.1074/jbc.m001486200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 249

  van de LochtA.StubbsM. T.BodeW.FriedrichT.BollschweilerC.HöffkenW.et al (1996). The ornithodorin-thrombin crystal structure, a key to the TAP enigma?EMBO J.156011–6017. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00989.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 250

  ViljoenG. J.NeitzA. W. H.ProzeskyL.BezuidenhoutJ. D.VermeulenN. M. J. (1985). Purification and properties of tick egg toxic proteins.Insect Biochem.15475–482. 10.1016/0020-1790(85)90060-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 251

  von SieboldC. T. H.StanniusH. (1854). Comparative Anatomy.London: Trubner and Company.

  • Google Scholar

• 252

  WagnerC. L.MascelliM. A.NeblockD. S.WeismanH. F.CollerB. S.JordanR. E. (1996). Analysis of GPIIb/IIIa receptor number by quantification of 7E3 binding to human platelets.Blood88907–914.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 253

  WangH.KaufmanW. R.CuiW. W.NuttallP. A. (2001b). Molecular individuality and adaptation of the tick Rhipicephalus appendiculatus in changed feeding environments.Med. Vet. Entomol.15403–412. 10.1046/j.0269-283x.2001.00328.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 254

  WangH.HailsR. S.CuiW. W.NuttallP. A. (2001a). Feeding aggregation of the tick Rhipicephalus appendiculatus (Ixodidae): benefits and costs in the contest with host responses.Parasitology123447–453.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 255

  WangH.NuttallP. A. (1994). Comparison of the proteins in salivary glands, saliva and haemolymph of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus female ticks during feeding.Parasitology109517–523.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 256

  WangH.PaesenG. C.NuttallP. A.BarbourA. G. (1998). Male ticks help their mates to feed.Nature391753–754. 10.1038/35773

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 257

  WangX.CoonsL. B.TaylorD. B.StevensS. E.Jr.GartnerT. K. (1996). Variabilin, a novel RGD-containing antagonist of glycoprotein IIb-IIIa and platelet aggregation inhibitor from the hard tick Dermacentor variabilis.J. Biol. Chem.27117785–17790. 10.1074/jbc.271.30.17785

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 258

  WangY.YuX.CaoJ.ZhouY.GongH.ZhangH.et al (2015). Characterization of a secreted cystatin from the tick Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloides.Exp. Appl. Acarol.67289–298. 10.1007/s10493-015-9946-8

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 259

  WattsS. W.MorrisonS. F.DavisR. P.BarmanS. M. (2012). Serotonin and blood pressure regulation.Pharmacol. Rev.64359–388. 10.1124/pr.111.004697

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 260

  WaxmanL.ConnollyT. M. (1993). Isolation of an inhibitor selective for collagen-stimulated platelet aggregation from the soft tick Ornithodoros moubata.J. Biol. Chem.2685445–5449.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 261

  WaxmanL.SmithD. E.ArcuriK. E.VlasukG. P. (1990). Tick anticoagulant peptide (TAP) is a novel inhibitor of blood coagulation factor Xa.Science248593–596. 10.1126/science.2333510

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 262

  WhisstockJ. C.SilvermanG. A.BirdP. I.BottomleyS. P.KaisermanD.LukeC. J.et al (2010). Serpins flex their muscle: II. Structural insights into target peptidase recognition, polymerization, and transport functions.J. Biol. Chem.28524307–24312. 10.1074/jbc.R110.141408

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 263

  WiegnerR.ChakrabortyS.Huber-LangM. (2016). Complement-coagulation crosstalk on cellular and artificial surfaces.Immunobiology2211073–1079. 10.1016/j.imbio.2016.06.005

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 264

  WikelS. (2017). “Arthropod modulation of wound healing. in arthropod vector,” in Controller of Disease TransmissionVol. 2edsWikelS. K.AksoyS.DimopoulosG. (Amsterdam: Elsevier) 31–50. 10.1016/b978-0-12-805360-7.00003-4

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 265

  XuA.Rodriguez-ValleM. (2016). Effective inhibition of thrombin by Rhipicephalus microplus serpin-15 (RmS-15) obtained in the yeast Pichia pastoris.Ticks Tick Borne Dis.7180–187. 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2015.09.007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 266

  XuX. L.ChengT. Y.YangH. (2016). Enolase, a plasminogen receptor isolated from salivary gland transcriptome of the ixodid tick Haemaphysalis flava.Parasitol. Res.1151955–1964. 10.1007/s00436-016-4938-0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 267

  YokomizoT. (2015). Two distinct leukotriene B4 receptors, BLT1 and BLT2.J. Biochem.15765–71. 10.1093/jb/mvu078

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 268

  ZhuK.BowmanA. S.BrighamD. L.EssenbergR. C.DillwithJ. W.SauerJ. R. (1997a). Isolation and characterization of Americanin, a specific inhibitor of thrombin, from the salivary glands of the lone star tick Amblyomma americanum (L.).Exp. Parasitol.8730–38. 10.1006/expr.1997.4175

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 269

  ZhuK.SauerJ. R.BowmanA. S.DillwithJ. W. (1997b). Identification and characterization of anticoagulant activities in the saliva of the lone star tick, Amblyomma americanum (L.).J. Parasitol.8338–43.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar