Gong Chen1,2,3†
Hang Liu1,2†Bo-Cheng Mo1,2Jue Hu1,2Shuang-Qing Liu1,2Carlos Bustos-Segura3Jing Xue1,2Xing Wang1,2*- 1Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory for Biology and Control of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, College of Plant Protection, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
- 2College of Plant Protection, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
- 3Institute of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
Although the cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera has traditionally been controlled by application of chemical pesticides, chemical control selects for resistance, pollutes the environment, and endangers human health. New methods for controlling H. armigera are therefore needed. Heliothis virescens ascovirus 3i (HvAV-3i) is a recently identified virus of the lepidopteran larvae. We tested the effects of HvAV-3i on H. armigera larvae following oral ingestion of HvAV-3i-containing hemolymph (about 1.0 × 1010 virus genome copies per larvae) and following injection of HvAV-3i-containing hemolymph by insertion of a needle. Following oral ingestion, first-instar to fifth-instar larvae grew and developed normally. Following needle injection, in contrast, the corrected mortality of third and fourth instars was 88.9 ± 2.1 and 93.7 ± 3.4%, respectively. Food intake was significantly lower for larvae injected with virus-containing hemolymph than with virus-free hemolymph. Larvae injected with virus-containing hemolymph had extended survival times and could not complete the pre-pupal stage. These results indicate that inoculation of HvAV-3i via needle injection, but not via oral ingestion, significantly reduced the growth and development of H. armigera larvae.
Introduction
The cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is a worldwide crop pest that attacks over 200 species in nearly 20 families (Wang et al., 2009; Bird, 2017). Control of H. armigera has mostly depended on chemical insecticides and BT cotton (Guo, 1997; Ahmad et al., 1999; Wu and Guo, 2005). As a result of the continuous and widespread use of Bt cotton and long-term, large-scale, and indiscriminate chemical pesticide use, H. armigera has developed resistance to Bt cotton and many pesticides (Wakil et al., 2009, 2010; Liu et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2012; Mironidis et al., 2013; Qayyum et al., 2015). To manage this pest, new methods of control, including biological control, are needed.
Ascoviruses are pathogens of insects that have the potential to provide biological control of H. armigera. Ascoviruses (Ascoviridae) were discovered in the larvae of Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) in the late 1970s and were named in the early 1980s (Adams et al., 1979; Hamm et al., 1986; Hudson and Carner, 1987). The genus Ascovirus contains five recognized species, including Spodoptera frugiperda ascovirus 1a, Tricoplusiani ascovirus 2a, Heliothis virescens ascovirus 3a (HvAV-3a), Diadromus pulchellus 4a, and Tricoplusiani ascovirus 6a (Bigot et al., 2011; Wei et al., 2014). Each ascovirus virion particle has a cyclic, super-helix double-stranded DNA genome (Federici, 1983; Asgari et al., 2017). Ascoviruses replicate intracellularly in their larval hosts and are highly pathogenic, causing failure to pupate in infected insect larvae. Ascoviruses typically induce cell rupture and the release of vesicles containing virus particles into the larval hemolymph (Federici et al., 1990; Asgari et al., 2017). Before they die, ascovirus-infected larvae exhibit weak muscle elasticity, decreased food intake, reduced weight gain, retarded growth, a yellow body color, and molting failure (Carner and Hudson, 1983; Federici and Govindarajan, 1990; Govindarajan and Federici, 1990). Ascoviruses are seldom transmitted via oral ingestion (Hamm et al., 1986; Federici and Govindarajan, 1990) but are often transmitted during oviposition by hymenopteran endoparasitoids (Bigot et al., 1997; Glynn Tillman et al., 2004; Stasiak et al., 2005). As a variant of HvAV-3a, the ascovirus HvAV-3i was first collected from infected Spodoptera frugiperda J.E. Smith (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae from south Florida, United States (Hamm et al., 1986) and was transmitted between noctuid larvae by braconid wasps (Stasiak et al., 2005). Although the effects of HvAV-3h on noctuid larvae have been studied (Li et al., 2013), the effects of HvAV-3i on H. armigera have not been studied.
In the current report, we describe the effects of HvAV-3i on larval instars of H. armigera, and we consider the potential of HvAV-3i as a biological control agent of this pest.
Materials and Methods
Insects and Viruses
A H. armigera population was established at the Virus Research Institute of Hunan Agricultural University. H. armigera larvae were reared on a pinto bean-based diet and were maintained in an incubator at 27 ± 1°C and with a relative humidity of 70% and a light:dark photoperiod of 14:10 h. Adults were supplied with a 10% honey solution. A laboratory stock of HvAV-3i was maintained by inoculating the third-instar larvae of Spodoptera litura Fabricius (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) with S. litura hemolymph containing HvAV-3i; this was done by inserting an HvAV-3i-contaminated needle into a proleg of each larva. Hemolymph containing HvAV-3i was originally obtained from laboratory storage. Six days after inoculation, HvAV-3i-containing hemolymph was harvested by removing one proleg of each of the infected S. litura larvae. The virus-containing hemolymph was obtained by applying pressure to the larvae; the expressed hemolymph was collected in a 1-ml sterile vial and was used immediately or stored at −20°C.
Effect of HvAV-3i Concentration on the Mortality of Needle-Inoculated H. armigera Larvae
The hemolymph of HvAV-3i-infected S. litura was serially diluted to obtain 0- to 10–7-fold dilutions with sterile water. Each of the eight dilutions was inoculated into the third-instar larvae (L3) of H. armigera by inserting a sterile fine needle (Brand: Braun; Specification: 0.3 mm × 8 mm) into a dilution and then inserting the tip of the needle (about 0.5 mm) into a proleg of an H. armigera larva; as a control, the larvae were inoculated with hemolymph from healthy S. litura larvae. Each combination of dilution and treatment (virus or mock inoculation) was represented by three replicates with 30 individuals per replicate. After inoculation, every individual was placed in a separate container with a diameter of 2 cm and a height of 2.5 cm. All larvae were fed with 27 mm3 of artificial diet (corn flour, soybean flour, yeast powder, agar, sorbic acid, sodium paraben, vitamins, cholesterol, tomato paste, etc.) (Burton, 1970) and kept at 27 ± 1°C with a relative humidity of 70% and a light:dark photoperiod of 14:10 h. We changed the fresh feed every 3 days. Each larva was observed daily for death and pupation, and the experiment was terminated after all larvae were dead or finished pupation.
Viral Transmission per os
Before feeding separate groups of 90 first-instar (L1) and 90 second-instar (L2) larvae at a room temperature of 27°C, the surface of the diet was coated with HvAV-3i-containing hemolymph. After 48 h, when all the virus-containing diet had been consumed, the average food intake was used to calculate the mean virus dosage ingested per individual. The two separate larval groups were then given fresh diet. Mortality was assessed daily until all larvae were dead or finished pupation.
First-instar (L1) and second-instar (L2) larvae were placed in separate plastic containers with a diameter of 8 cm and a height of 8.5 cm (90 larvae per container). Each container contained 1 cm3 of artificial diet, the surface of which had been evenly coated with 100 μl of HvAV-3i-containing hemolymph (about 1.0 × 1010 genome copies per μl). The containers were kept at 27°C. After 48 h, when all the virus-containing diet had been consumed (the quantity of food ingested was used to calculate the quantity of virus ingested per larva), and then all the larvae were single-head fed with fresh diet in plastic containers with a diameter of 2 cm and a height of 2.5 cm. Controls were identical except that the diet was coated with hemolymph from healthy insects. Each treatment (L1 or L2 larvae that were fed hemolymph that contained or did not contain HvAV-3i) was represented by 90 replicate containers. Mortality was assessed daily until all larvae were dead or finished pupation.
Third-instar (L3), fourth-instar (L4), and fifth instar (L5) larvae were placed in separate plastic containers with a diameter of 2 cm and a height of 2.5 cm (a larvae per container). Each container contained 27 mm3 of artificial diet, the surface of which had been evenly coated with 1 μl of HvAV-3i-containing hemolymph (about 1.0 × 1010 genome copies per μl). The containers were kept at 27°C. After 48 h, when all the virus-containing diet had been consumed (the quantity of food ingested was used to calculate the quantity of virus ingested per larva), the larvae were then given fresh diet. Controls were identical except that the diet was coated with hemolymph from healthy insects. Each treatment (L3, L4, and L5 larvae that were fed hemolymph that contained or did not contain HvAV-3i) was represented by 90 replicate containers. Mortality was assessed daily until all larvae were dead or finished pupation.
Viral Transmission by Needle Injection
L3 and L4 larvae were inoculated with virus (about 150–200 virions/cell) by pushing an HvAV-3i-contaminated needle into the left third proleg; L1 and L2 larvae were not included in this experiment because they were too small to inoculate with a needle. A total of 180 L3 larvae and 180 L4 larvae were selected for inoculation with hemolymph (0.16 ± 0.01 μl undiluted hemolymph per larva) by needle as described by Federici et al. (1990). Half of the L3 and L4 larvae were inoculated with virus-containing hemolymph, and the other half were inoculated with hemolymph from a healthy insect. The larvae were then placed in containers with a diameter of 8.5 cm and a height of 8 cm. One larva was placed with 27 mm3 of block feed in the container at 27°C. Death and pupation were recorded daily, survival curves were plotted, and mortality rates were calculated. Larval body weight and the quantity of diet ingested (the reduction after feeding) were determined daily with an electronic balance (Shimadzu AUY120) until the larva died or pupated. The loss of moisture from the diet by evaporation was calculated as previously described (Li et al., 2013). The daily food consumption and the total food intake were compared to the control group separately.
Statistical Analyses
Adjusted mortality rate of treated groups was obtained using the one-way ANOVA procedure; before analysis, the data were determined to have a normal distribution. Larval body weight and food intake data were tested for a normal distribution and were examined with one-way analyses of variance (α = 0.05) using SPSS 22.0. Graphs were created using the SigmaPlot 12.5 software, and the larval mortality rates were calculated using the following formula: mortality rate = number of dead larvae/total number of larvae × 100%. The median survival times and 95% confidence intervals were obtained through the Kaplan–Meier method (SPSS). The log-rank test was used to determine treatment differences in survival times (P < 0.05), and survival curves were created with the GraphPad Prism 6 software.
Results
Mortality of Needle-Inoculated H. armigera as Affected by HvAV-3i Concentration
The mortality of needle-inoculated H. armigera larvae was significantly affected by HvAV-3i hemolymph dilution (F7,16 = 419.05, P < 0.0001). Mortality exceeded 80% with the undiluted and 101-fold diluted virus-containing hemolymph but rapidly dropped with additional dilutions (Figure 1). Mortality for larvae inoculated with virus-free hemolymph was <12.5% regardless of the dilution.
Figure 1. Mortality of needle-inoculated Helicoverpa armigera as affected by HvAV-3i concentration. Third-instar larvae of H. armigera were inoculated (via insertion of a needle into a proleg) with serially diluted hemolymph obtained from Heliothis virescens ascovirus 3i (HvAV-3i)-infected Spodoptera litura larvae (about 1 × 1013 genome copies per mL before dilution). Values are means ± SE of three replications, with 30 larvae per replication. Means with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA, LSD).
Mortality and Survival Time After per os Inoculation
Based on the quantity of hemolymph-coated diet ingested, each larva ingested about 1 × 1010 genome copies. The mortality of L1, L2, L3, L4, or L5 larvae observed among larvae that ingested virus-containing hemolymph or virus-free hemolymph was >90% of the larvae developed and pupated.
Mortality and Survival of Needle-Inoculated L3 and L4 Larvae
According to the quantitative results of the virus, the amount of virus genome copies given to individual L3 to L4 was 1.56 × 109. During the 32 days after inoculation, the mortality rate was 88.89 ± 2.14 and 93.65 ± 3.36% for L3 and L4 larvae that were needle inoculated with virus-containing hemolymph, respectively, and was 4.44 ± 1.11 and 11.10 ± 1.10% for L3 and L4 larvae that were needle inoculated with virus-free hemolymph, respectively. Mortality did not significantly differ between virus-inoculated L3 and L4 larvae (F7,16 = 0.34, P = 0.727). The median survival time (ST50) was significantly longer for virus-inoculated L3 and L4 larvae than for the mock-inoculated group larvae (Table 1). When plotted overtime, survival was also significantly greater for larvae inoculated with virus-containing hemolymph than for larvae inoculated with virus-free hemolymph (L3: χ2 = 62.64, df = 1, P < 0.0001, Figure 2A; L4: χ2 = 33.35, df = 1, P < 0.0001; Figure 2B). This difference in survival time was explained by the pupation rate, which was 99% for mock-inoculated larvae and 0% for virus-inoculated larvae.
Table 1. Survival time (days) of L3 and L4 larvae needle inoculated with virus-containing hemolymph or virus-free hemolymph.
Figure 2. Survival curves of H. armigera larvae that were needle inoculated with virus-containing hemolymph (+HvAV-3i) or virus-free hemolymph (-HvAV-3i) (mock). (A) Third-instar larvae. (B) Fourth-instar larvae. Survival of the control larvae was considered to terminate when the larvae pupated.
Body Weight and Feeding of L3 and L4 Larvae That Were Needle-Inoculated With Virus-Containing or Virus-Free Hemolymph
From day 1 to day 7 after inoculation, the body weight was significantly smaller for L3 larvae that were needle inoculated with virus-containing hemolymph than for L3 larvae that were needle inoculated with virus-free hemolymph (F1,124 = 60.45, P < 0.0001 for day 1; F1,124 = 7.26, P = 0.008 for day 2; F1,124 = 74.26, P < 0.0001 for day 3; F1,124 = 43.837, P < 0.0001 for day 4; F1,124 = 18.29, P < 0.0001 for day 5; F1,124 = 11.81, P = 0.001 for day 6; F1,124 = 6.35, P = 0.014 for day 7) (Figure 3A). The body weight of L3 larvae that were inoculated with virus-containing hemolymph increased rapidly from day 0 to day 6 after inoculation but gradually decreased thereafter. The body weight of L3 larvae that were inoculated with virus-free hemolymph increased to day 7, at which time 92.5% of the larvae pupated.
Figure 3. Daily body weight of (A) L3 larvae and (B) L4 larvae of H. armigera that were needle inoculated with virus-containing hemolymph (+HvAV-3i) or virus-free hemolymph (-HvAV-3i). Values are means ± SE. On each day, an asterisk indicates a significant difference between the +HvAV-3i and -HvAV-3i (control) groups (P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA).
Body weight did not differ significantly between L4 larvae inoculated with virus-containing hemolymph and L4 larvae inoculated with virus-free hemolymph on days 0 and 1 and on days 9, 10, and 11 after inoculation (F1,117 = 1.26, P = 0.26 for day 0; F1,117 = 0.15, P = 0.70 for day 1; F1,117 = 1.70, P = 0.20 for day 9; F1,117 = 0.39, P = 0.54 for day 10; F1,117 = 0.01, P = 0.94 for day 11) (Figure 3B). Body weight was significantly smaller for L4 larvae inoculated with virus-containing hemolymph than for L4 larvae inoculated with virus-free hemolymph on days 2–8 after inoculation (F1,117 = 4.13, P = 0.04 for day 2; F1,117 = 5.02, P = 0.03 for day 3; F1,117 = 17.37, P < 0.0001 for day 4; F1,117 = 46.80, P < 0.0001 for day 5; F1,117 = 33.42, P < 0.0001 for day 6; F1,117 = 4.59, P < 0.04 for day 7; F1,117 = 6.90, P = 0.01 for day 8) (Figure 3B). The body weight of the L4 larvae that were inoculated with virus-containing hemolymph increased during the first 5 days after inoculation and then remained relatively stable until the end of the experiment.
L3 larvae inoculated with virus-containing hemolymph ingested less food than L3 larvae inoculated with virus-free hemolymph at days 1–6 after needle inoculation (F1,124 = 29.26, P < 0.0001 for day 1; F1,124 = 17.87, P < 0.0001 for day 2; F1,124 = 49.10, P < 0.0001 for day 3; F1,124 = 22.05, P < 0.0001 for day 4; F1,124 = 7.32, P = 0.008 for day 5; F1,124 = 8.42, P < 0.005 for day 6) (Figure 4A). From day 7 to day 31, however, food ingestion did not differ between the two groups. The quantity of food ingested by L3 larvae that were inoculated with virus-free hemolymph increased from day 1 to day 6 but then declined to zero as the larvae entered the pre-pupal stage (Figure 4A). The quantity of food ingested by L3 larvae that were inoculated with virus-containing hemolymph also increased from day 1 to day 6 but then declined and remained relatively low and stable from day 8 to day 31, i.e., the virus-inoculated L3 larvae survived and continued to ingest small quantities of food until day 31 (Figure 4A).
Figure 4. Daily food intake by (A) L3 and (B) L4 larvae of H. armigera that were needle inoculated with virus-containing hemolymph or virus-free hemolymph (mock). Values are means ± SE. On each day, an asterisk indicates a significant difference between the inoculated group and the mock-infected group (P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA).
The quantity of food ingested did not significantly differ for L4 larvae inoculated with virus-containing hemolymph vs. L4 larvae inoculated with virus-free hemolymph on days 1–3 after needle inoculation (F1,117 = 0.29, P = 0.59 for day 1; F1,117 = 0.13, P = 0.72 for day 2; F1,117 = 2.156, P = 0.145 for day 3) (Figure 4B). From day 4 to day 12, L4 larvae inoculated with virus-containing hemolymph ingested less food than L4 larvae inoculated with virus-free hemolymph (F1,117 = 45.79, P < 0.0001 for day 4; F1,117 = 91.80, P < 0.0001 for day 5; F1,117 = 99.37, P < 0.0001 for day 6; F1,117 = 57.22, P < 0.0001 for day 7; F1,117 = 22.99, P < 0.0001 for day 8; F1,117 = 8.17, P = 0.007 for day 9; F1,117 = 15.73, P < 0.0001 for day 10; F1,117 = 4.26, P = 0.048 for day 11) (Figure 4B). From day 4 to day 8, food ingestion by the L4 larvae that were not inoculated with virus was relatively stable; these L4 larvae entered the pre-pupal stage on day 6, and their food ingestion dropped on day 9 and ceased on day 12. The quantity of food ingested by virus-inoculated L4 larvae gradually decreased from day 1 to day 31 (Figure 4B).
Total Food Ingested by L3 and L4 Larvae That Were Needle Inoculated With Virus-Containing or Virus-Free Hemolymph
The total quantity of food ingested per larva was significantly greater for virus-inoculated L3 larvae than for virus-free L3 larvae but did not significantly differ between virus-inoculated L4 larvae and virus-free L4 larvae (L3: F1,5 = 10.20, df = 1, P = 0.002; L4: F1,5 = 2.29, df = 1, P = 0.133) (Table 2).
Table 2. Total food ingested by L3 and L4 larvae that were needle inoculated with virus-containing hemolymph or virus-free hemolymph.
Discussion
In the current study, we analyzed the effects of HvAV-3i on the growth and development of H. armigera. Compared to baculoviruses and nuclear polyhedrosis viruses, ascoviruses have a low toxicity and cause only low mortality in assays involving transmission via oral ingestion (Govindarajan and Federici, 1990; Caballero et al., 1992; Senthil-Nathan and Kalaivani, 2005, 2006). We previously reported that only a few early instar larvae of S. exigua were infected by HvAV-3h following oral ingestion (Hu et al., 2016). The current study was consistent with that earlier study in that no mortality occurred when L1–L5 larvae of H. armigera were inoculated with HvAV-3i via oral ingestion. Although HvAV-3i and HvAV-3h were isolated in different host generations and on different continents (Hamm et al., 1985; Huang et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2018, 2019), they are similar in being poorly transmitted or not transmitted at all via oral ingestion.
Hamm et al. (1986) found that ascoviruses are mainly spread in the field by the oviposition behavior of parasitic wasps. In attempt to mimic transmission via wasp oviposition, we used a needle to inject HvAV-3i into H. armigera larvae. In contrast to oral ingestion, pin inoculation resulted in mortality rates that exceeded 80% (Figure 1), and those larvae that survived were unable to enter the pre-pupal stage. Although the mortality rates caused by HvAV-3i inoculation of H. armigera larvae were high, they were not as high as those caused by HvAV-3h inoculation of S. exigua larvae (Hu et al., 2016). The survival time was also longer for HvAV-3i-inoculated H. armigera larvae than for HvAV-3h-inoculated S. exigua larvae (Hu et al., 2016). As a consequence, the pool of HvAV-3i inoculum may persist longer than the pool of HvAV-3h inoculum in the field. Together, the current results indicate that HvAV-3i may be useful for the biological control of H. armigera.
Given that ascoviruses are transmitted by parasitic wasps, the simultaneous application of parasitic wasps and ascoviruses should be considered as a biological control strategy (Stasiak et al., 2005). During oviposition, the parasitoid’s ovipositor can be contaminated with virions circulating in the hemolymph of the caterpillar (Asgari et al., 2017). The ascovirus can then be transmitted when the parasitoid wasp oviposits in another host (Chen et al., 2018, 2019). The effects of HvAV-3i on H. armigera and the interactions between HvAV-3i and parasitoid wasps should be investigated in the field.
Conclusion
The current results indicate that the HvAV-3i virus cannot infect H. armigera larvae by oral ingestion but can infect H. armigera larvae when the virus is needle inoculated into L3 and L4 larvae. Needle inoculation of H. armigera larvae led to a high infection rate, rapid pathogenicity, sharply reduced feeding, greatly reduced gains in body weight, and the prolonged duration of larval stages. The results therefore indicate that HvAV-3i has a potential as a biological control agent of H. armigera and that HvAV-3i-infected H. armigera may be useful for increasing and maintaining the pools of HvAV-3i inoculum in the field.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.
Author Contributions
JH and XW contributed to the data curation. HL, JH, and B-CM contributed to the formal analysis. GC, HL, S-QL, JX, and JH contributed to the investigation. GC and XW contributed to the methodology, the project administration, and the validation. GC, HL, and JH contributed to the writing of the original draft. GC, XW, and CB-S contributed to the reviewing and editing aspect of the writing for the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31801799), the Hunan Province Natural Science Foundation (2019JJ50274), the Hunan Education Bureau Research Foundation (18B123), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31872027), Changsha Science and Technology Project (kq1901033), and the Double First-Class Construction Project of Hunan Agricultural University.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Xiao-Wen Cheng (Department of Microbiology, Miami University, United States) for providing the ascovirus materials.
References
Adams, J., Stadelbacher, E., and Tompkins, G. (1979). “A new virus-like particle isolated from the cotton bollworm, Heliothis zea biological control,” in 37th Annual Proceedings of the Electron Microscopy Society of America, San Antonio, TX, 238–249.
Ahmad, M., Arif, M. I., and Ahmad, Z. (1999). Patterns of resistance to organophosphate insecticides in field populations of Helicoverpa armigera in Pakistan. Pest. Sci. 55, 626–632. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9063(199906)55:63.0.CO;2-L
Asgari, S., Bideshi, D. K., Bigot, Y., Federici, B. A., and Cheng, X. W. (2017). Ictv virus taxonomy profile:ascoviridae. J. Gen. Virol. 98, 4–5. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000677
Bigot, Y., Federici, B. A., Cheng, X. W., Bideshi, D. K., and Renault, S. (2011). “Family Ascoviridae,” in Virus Taxonomy: Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses, eds M. A. King, M. J. Adams, E. B. Carstens, and E. J. Lefkowitz, (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 147–152. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-384684-6.00011-2
Bigot, Y., Rabouille, A., Doury, G., Sizaret, P. Y., Delbost, F., Hamelin, M. H., et al. (1997). Biological and molecular features of the relationships between Diadromuspulchellus ascovirus, a parasitoid hymenopteran wasp (Diadromuspulchellus) and its lepidopteran host, Acrolepiopsisassectella. J. Gen. Virol. 78, 1149–1163. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-78-5-1149
Bird, L. J. (2017). Genetics, cross-resistance and synergism of indoxacarb resistance in Helicoverpaarmigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Pest Manag. Sci. 73, 575–581. doi: 10.1002/ps.4334
Burton, R. L. (1970). A low-cost artificial diet for the corn earworm. J. Econ. Entomol. 63, 1969–1970. doi: 10.1093/jee/63.6.1969
Caballero, P., Zuidema, D., Santiag-Alvarez, C., and Vlak, J. M. (1992). Biochemical and biological characterization of four isolates of Spodopteraexigua nuclear polyhedrosis virus. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2, 145–157. doi: 10.1080/09583159209355228
Carner, G., and Hudson, J. (1983). Histopathology of virus-like particles in Heliothis spp. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 41, 238–249. doi: 10.1016/0022-2011(83)90224-0
Chen, Z. S., Cheng, X. W., Wang, X., Hou, D. H., and Huang, G. H. (2019). Proteomic analysis of the Heliothis virescens ascovirus 3i (HvAV-3i) virion. J. Gen. Virol. 100, 301–307. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001197
Chen, Z. S., Hou, D. H., Cheng, X. W., Wang, X., and Huang, G. H. (2018). Genomic analysis of a novel isolate Heliothis virescens ascovirus 3i (HvAV-3i) and identification of ascoviral repeat ORFs (aros). Arch. Virol. 163, 2849–2853. doi: 10.1007/s00705-018-3899-2
Federici, B. A. (1983). Enveloped double-stranded DNA insect virus with novel structure and cytopathology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 80, 7664–7668. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.24.7664
Federici, B. A., and Govindarajan, R. (1990). Comparative histopathology of three ascovirus isolates in larvalnoctuids. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 56, 300–311. doi: 10.1016/0022-2011(90)90116-N
Federici, B. A., Vlak, J. M., and Hamm, J. J. (1990). Comparative study of virion structure, protein composition and genomic DNA of three ascovirus isolates. J. Gen. Virol. 71, 1661–1668. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-71-8-1661
Glynn Tillman, P., Styer, E. L., and Hamm, J. J. (2004). Transmission of Ascovirus from Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) by three parasitoids and effects of virus on survival of parasitoid Cardiochilesnigriceps (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Environ. Entomol. 33, 633–643. doi: 10.1603/0046-225X-33.3.633
Govindarajan, R., and Federici, B. A. (1990). Ascovirus infectivity and effects of infection on the growth and development of noctuid larvae. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 56, 291–299. doi: 10.1016/0022-2011(90)90115-M
Guo, Y. Y. (1997). Progress in the researches on migration regularity of cotton bollworm and relationships between the pest and its host plants. Acta Entomol. Sin. 40, 1–6.
Hamm, J. J., Norlung, D. A., and Marti, O. (1985). Effects of a nonoccludedvirus of Spodopterafrugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on the developmentof a parasitoid, Cotesiamarginiventris (Hymenoptera:Braconidae). Environ. Entomol. 14, 258–261. doi: 10.1093/ee/14.3.258
Hamm, J. J., Pair, S. D., and Marti, O. G. (1986). Incidence and host range of a new ascovirus isolated from fall armyworm, Spodopterafrugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Fla. Entomol. 69, 524–531. doi: 10.2307/3495385
Hu, J., Gu, X. S., Li, S. J., and Huang, G. H. (2016). Infection characterization by Spodopterafrugiperda ascovirus isolate 84-36 and growing development of infected Spodopteraexigua larvae. Chin. J. Biol. Control 32, 189–195. doi: 10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x
Huang, G. H., Garretson, T. A., Cheng, X. H., Holztrager, M. S., Li, S. J., Wang, X., et al. (2012). Phylogenetic position and replicationkinetics of Heliothis virescens ascovirus 3h (HvAV-3h) isolated from Spodopteraexigua. PLoS One 7:e40225. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040225
Hudson, J. S., and Carner, G. R. (1987). Histopathology of an unidentified virus of Heliothis zea and Heliothis virescens. Proc. Southeast Electron Microsc. Soc. 4:27.
Li, S. J., Wang, X., Zhou, Z. S., Zhu, J., Hu, J., Zhao, Y. P., et al. (2013). A comparison of growth and development of three major agricultural insect pests infected with Heliothis virescens ascovirus 3h (HvAV-3h). PLoS One 8:e85704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085704
Liu, F. Y., Xu, Z. P., Zhu, Y. C., Huang, F. N., Wang, Y. H., Li, H. L., et al. (2010). Evidence of field-evolved resistance to Cry1Ac-expressing Bt cotton in Helicover paarmigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in northern China. Pest Manag. Sci. 66, 155–161. doi: 10.1002/ps.1849
Mironidis, G., Kapantaidaki, D., Bentila, M., Morou, E., Savopoulou-Soultani, M., and Vontas, J. (2013). Resurgence of the cotton bollworm Helicoverpaarmigera in northern Greece associated with insecticide resistance. Insect Sci. 20, 505–512. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7917.2012.01528.x
Qayyum, M. A., Wakil, W., Arif, M. J., Sahi, S. T., Saeed, N. A., and Russell, D. A. (2015). Multiple resistances against formulated organophosphates, pyrethroids, and newer-chemistry insecticides in populations of Helicoverpaarmigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from Pakistan. J. Econ. Entomol. 108, 286–293. doi: 10.1093/jee/tou037
Senthil-Nathan, S., and Kalaivani, K. (2005). Efficacy of nucleopolyhedrovirusand azadirachtin on Spodopteralitura Fabricius (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Biol. Control 34, 93–98. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2005.03.001
Senthil-Nathan, S., and Kalaivani, K. (2006). Combined effects of azadirachtinand nucleopolyhedrovirus (SpltNPV) on Spodopteralitura Fabricius(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae. Biol. Control 39, 94–104. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2006.06.013
Stasiak, K., Renault, S., Federici, B. A., and Bigot, Y. (2005). Characteristics of pathogenic and mutualistic relationships of ascoviruses in field populations of parasitoid wasps. Insect Physiol. 51, 103–115. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys
Wakil, W., Ashfaq, M., Kwon, Y. J., and Ghazanfar, M. U. (2009). Trends in integrated pest management strategies for the control of Helicoverpaarmigera (Hubner) caterpillars on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Entomol. Res. 39, 84–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5967.2008.00198.x
Wakil, W., Ghazanfar, M. U., Kwon, Y. J., Qayyum, M. A., and Nasir, F. (2010). Distribution of Helicoverpaarmigera Hubner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in tomato fields and its relationship to weather factors. Entomol. Res. 40, 290–297. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5967.2010.00301
Wang, D., Qiu, X., Ren, X., Niu, F., and Wang, K. (2009). Resistance selection and biochemical characterization of spinosad resistance in Helicoverpaarmigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 95, 90–94. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp
Wei, Y. L., Hu, J., Li, S. J., Chen, Z. S., Cheng, X. W., and Huang, G. H. (2014). Genome sequence and organization analysis of Heliothis virescens ascovirus 3f isolated from a Helicoverpazea larva. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 122, 40–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2014.08.003
Wu, K. M., and Guo, Y. Y. (2005). The evolution of cotton pest management practices in China. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 50, 31–52. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.50.071803.130349
Keywords: Heliothis virescens ascovirus 3i, Helicoverpa armigera, pathogenic ability, mortality, insect virus
Citation: Chen G, Liu H, Mo B-C, Hu J, Liu S-Q, Bustos-Segura C, Xue J and Wang X (2020) Growth and Development of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Larvae Infected by Heliothis virescens ascovirus 3i (HvAV-3i). Front. Physiol. 11:93. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00093
Received: 31 October 2019; Accepted: 27 January 2020;
Published: 05 March 2020.
Edited by:
Fernando Ariel Genta, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), BrazilReviewed by:
Sassan Asgari, The University of Queensland, AustraliaWaqas Wakil, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan
Copyright © 2020 Chen, Liu, Mo, Hu, Liu, Bustos-Segura, Xue and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xing Wang, wangxing@hunau.edu.cn
†These authors have contributed equally to this work