Skip to main content

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Physiol., 26 March 2020
Sec. Cardiac Electrophysiology
This article is part of the Research Topic Mechano-Calcium, Mechano-Electric, and Mechano-Metabolic Feedback Loops: Contribution to the Myocardium Contraction in Health and Diseases View all 19 articles

Arrhythmogenic Interaction Between Sympathetic Tone and Mechanical Stretch in Rat Pulmonary Vein Myocardium

\r\nYuriy V. EgorovYuriy V. Egorov1Leonid V. RosenshtraukhLeonid V. Rosenshtraukh1Alexey V. Glukhov*Alexey V. Glukhov2*
  • 1Laboratory of Heart Electrophysiology, Russian Cardiology Research Centre, Institute of Experimental Cardiology, Moscow, Russia
  • 2Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, United States

Rapid firing from pulmonary veins (PVs) frequently initiates atrial fibrillation, which is a common comorbidity associated with hypertension, heart failure, and valvular disease, i.e., conditions that pathologically increase cardiomyocyte stretch. Autonomic tone plays a crucial role in PV arrhythmogenesis, while its interplay with myocardium stretch remains uncertain. Two-microelectrode technique was used to characterize electrophysiological response of Wistar rat PV to adrenaline at baseline and under mild (150 mg of applied weight that corresponds to a pulmonary venous pressure of 1 mmHg) and moderate (10 g, ∼26 mmHg) stretch. Low concentrations of adrenaline (25–100 nmol/L) depolarized the resting membrane potential selectively within distal PV (by 26 ± 2 mV at baseline, by 18 ± 1 mV at 150 mg, P < 0.001, and by 5.9 ± 1.1 mV at 10 g, P < 0.01) suppressing action potential amplitude and resulting in intra-PV conduction dissociation and rare episodes of spontaneous activity (arrhythmia index of 0.4 ± 0.2, NS vs. no activity at baseline). In contrast, 1–10 μmol/L of adrenaline recovered intra-PV propagation. While mild stretch did not affect PV electrophysiology at baseline, moderate stretch depolarized the resting potential within distal PV (-56 ± 2 mV vs. -82 ± 1 mV at baseline, P < 0.01), facilitated the triggering of rapid PV firing by adrenaline (arrhythmia index: 4.4 ± 0.2 vs. 1.3 ± 0.4 in unstretched, P < 0.001, and 1.7 ± 0.8 in mildly stretched preparations, P < 0.005, at 10 μmol/L adrenaline) and induced frequent episodes of potentially arrhythmogenic atrial “echo” extra beats. Our findings demonstrate complex interactions between the sympathetic tone and mechanical stretch in the development of arrhythmogenic activity within PVs that may impact an increased atrial fibrillation vulnerability in patients with elevated blood pressure.

Introduction

Focal electrical activity from pulmonary veins (PVs) frequently initiates atrial fibrillation (Haissaguerre et al., 1998; Chen et al., 1999), which is a common comorbidity associated with hypertension, heart failure, and valvular disease (Schotten et al., 2011). These conditions cause hemodynamic atrial overload resulting in pathologically increased cardiomyocyte stretch and facilitates the arrhythmogenic activity from PVs (Tsao et al., 2001). In the setting of atrial dilatation, mechanoelectrical feedback has been linked to the development of ectopic beats that trigger atrial fibrillation. However, the precise mechanisms remain poorly understood.

We (Egorov et al., 2015, 2019) and others (Arora et al., 2003; Walters et al., 2014; Pasqualin et al., 2018) have demonstrated a significant electrophysiological heterogeneity of myocardial cells within PVs, which may form a functional substrate for focal activity and echo extra beats. This was linked to a distinct ionic channel and Ca2+-handling gene repertoire in PVs that would underlie their distinct response to proarrhythmic stimuli. Our recent study revealed a tension-dependent stretch-induced depolarization of the resting membrane potential (RP) within the distal part of rat PV, which decreased action potential (AP) amplitude (APA) and triggered conduction discontinuities and both ectopic and reentrant activities within the vein (Egorov et al., 2019). One may suggest that such stretch-induced arrhythmogenesis would significantly interfere with autonomic tone that plays a crucial role in triggering rapid firing from PVs (Patterson et al., 2005; Doisne et al., 2009). It was shown that the differences in the RP and reaction to adrenergic stimulation between the PV and the left atrium leads to automatic electrical activity occurring specifically in PV (Doisne et al., 2009). Indeed, PV myocytes demonstrated a low density of the Kir2. x channels and the RP stabilizing inwardly rectifying current IK1 (Melnyk et al., 2005; Tsuneoka et al., 2017), increased resting Na+ permeability (Malecot et al., 2015), and enhanced chloride conductance (Okamoto et al., 2014).

In this study, we hypothesized that myocardial stretch would facilitate the development of arrhythmogenic ectopic activity induced by sympathetic stimulation in the PV. To test this, two-microelectrode technique was used to characterize a region-specific electrophysiological response of rat PV myocardium to low (25–100 nmol/L) and high (1–10 μmol/L) concentrations of adrenaline at baseline and under mild (150 mg of applied weight, which corresponds to a PV pressure of 1 mmHg) and moderate (10 g, ∼26 mmHg) stretch.

Materials and Methods

Animals and Preparations

All methods and protocols used in these studies have been approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Cardiology Research Center (Moscow, Russia) following the Guidelines for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (publication no. 85-23, revised 1996). All animals used in this study received humane care in compliance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Adult (8- to 12-month-old) Wistar rats (n = 7) of both sexes were used. Rats were anesthetized with urethane 2 g/kg with heparin (0.2 U), and the loss of pain reflex was evaluated to assure the appropriate level of anesthesia. The isolated PV preparation was performed as described previously (Egorov et al., 2015, 2019). Briefly, after mid-sternal incision, the heart with lungs was removed and placed in oxygenated (95% O2, 5% CO2) room-temperature Tyrode solution of the following composition (in mmol/L): 118 NaCl, 1.8 CaCl2, 1.2 MgCl2, 4.7 KCl, 1.2 NaH2PO4, 25 NaHCO3, and 11 glucose (pH = 7.35 ± 0.05). The left atrium (LA) together with the LA appendage and PV region was dissected from the ventricles, right atrium, and interatrial septum. The preparation then was placed in a tissue bath (2.5 ml) and continuously superfused with oxygenated Tyrode’s solution (18 ml/min) at 37 ± 0.5°C. Central PV was cleaned from fat and lung tissues, beside the LA, lanced and then positioned on a thin coat of silicon on the bottom of a tissue bath with the endocardial side facing upward. The pacing electrode was placed on the edge of the left atrial appendage. A small portion of the end−distal part of the PV was not cut open and was used to weave a silk suture (4−0) with a weight applied.

Microelectrode Recordings

Transmembrane potentials were simultaneously recorded from the endocardial surface of the distal (PVdis) and the ostial (PVost) parts of the PV (Egorov et al., 2019) using two glass microelectrodes filled with 3.0 mmol/L KCl (tip resistance, ∼10–40 MΩ) and connected to high-input impedance amplifiers (WPI model KS-701, World Precision Instruments, New Haven, CT, United States). Microelectrodes were stably maintained within the tissue during all the measurements within each experimental condition (unstretched, 150 mg and stretch, 10 g; Figure 1). In some preparations, microelectrode stability was lost during 1-h stretch applications (i.e., between experimental conditions), and repenetration in nearby tissue was performed. Transmembrane potential signals were recorded, digitized (sampling rate of 5 kHz) using analog-digital converter (E-154, L-Card, Moscow, Russia), and then saved on a computer for offline analysis as described previously (Egorov et al., 2015). To characterize electrophysiological properties of the PV myocardium, RP and APA were measured during S1S1 = 300 ms pacing. The pacing current was at least 2× the pacing threshold.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Complex interactions between sympathetic tone and mechanical stretch in rat pulmonary vein (PV) myocardium. Top: Experimental protocol for testing different levels of sympathetic stimulation in unstretched and stretched PV preparations. Physiological status of PVdis inexcitability induced be either low concentrations of adrenaline (25–100 nmol/L), or pathological stretch (10.5 g) was tested by a brief application of acetylcholine (ACh), which was administered to hyperpolarize the RP and recover PVdis excitability and then washed out to continue experimental protocol. All measurements were performed during constant left atrial pacing, except brief (5–10 min) periods when pacing was stopped (no pacing, NP), and spontaneous rhythm was recorded if present. Below, changes in the resting membrane potential (middle panels) and action potential amplitude (low panels) are shown for distal (red traces) and ostium (blue traces) PV regions at baseline (no adrenaline applied) and under low (25–100 nmol/L) and high (1–10 μmol/L) concentrations of adrenaline measured in unstretched and stretched (150 mg and 10 g) preparations. Changes are shown for individual rats (light blue and light red lines) as well as mean ± SEM (solid lines). Red dashed box indicates the presence of PVdis inexcitability. N = 6–7 rats. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 for PVdis vs. PVost; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001 within the same group vs. baseline by repeated measurements two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction.

Experimental Protocol

Experimental protocol is shown schematically in Figure 1. Measurements were performed 40–60 min after the isolation procedure. Three adrenaline concentrations (25–100 nmol/L, 1 and 10 μmol/L) were tested at baseline (no stretch applied), under mild stretch (150 mg of weight applied, which approximately corresponds to a physiological pulmonary venous pressure of 1 mmHg calculated as applied weight × gravity constant/cross-section area of the PV preparation) and under moderate stretch (10 g of applied weight corresponding approximately to 26 mmHg of pulmonary venous pressure) as described previously (Egorov et al., 2019). For each condition, we first tested nanomolar concentrations of adrenaline (25–100 nmol/L) required to induce inexcitability within the PVdis (determined as a failure of excitation propagation from PVost to PVdis under constant LA pacing and APA in PVdis < 20 mV, see Figure 2A). To test if PVdis inexcitability was associated with adrenaline-induced RP depolarization rather than microelectrode stability, 1 μmol/L acetylcholine was briefly applied to stimulate the acetylcholine-activated outward potassium current IK,ACh, hyperpolarize the RP, and recover intra-PV conduction. After that, acetylcholine was washed out, and the next concentration of adrenaline was applied for 10 min. Preparations were constantly paced at stable S1S1 = 300 ms cycle length. To characterize spontaneous activity within the PV, electrical pacing was stopped for 5–10 min under each experimental condition. The protocol was repeated for 150 mg and 10 g of weight. Each weight was applied for an hour while adrenaline was washed out. The protocol was about 4–5 h long and applied to all the preparations tested. Importantly, in all experiments, PV preparations were functionally intact throughout the entire experiment as we demonstrated previously (Egorov et al., 2019) and tested here by their response to regular applications of acetylcholine.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Biphasic effect of adrenaline on intra-pulmonary vein (PV) conduction. (A) Application of 50 nmol/L adrenaline results in the depolarization of resting membrane potential (RP) exclusively in PVdis leading to intra-PV conduction dissociation. Two simultaneous microelectrode recordings from PVdis (top recording in red) and PVost (bottom recording in blue) are shown. Below, selected time windows (gray rectangles) are shown enlarged before (baseline) and during PVdis inexcitability under 50 nmol/L adrenaline. Left atria (LA) was constantly paced with S1S1 = 300 ms. (B) Application of 1 μmol/L adrenaline recovered intra-PV conduction suppressed by 50 nmol/L adrenaline. Below, selected time windows (gray rectangles) are shown enlarged before and after the recovery of excitability of PVdis.

Arrhythmia score was defined according to a type of spontaneous electrical activity event as follows: 0, no spontaneous activity; 1, an irregular sporadic electrical activity; 2, irregular bursts of fast electrical activity; 3, irregular bursts of fast electrical activity that was suppressed by atrial pacing; 4, a stable, but slow PV rhythm that could not be suppressed by atrial pacing; and 5, a fast regular PV rhythm that could not be suppressed by atrial pacing and was complicated by echo extra beats.

Statistics

Student’s t-test was used in two-group comparisons. Multiple groups of normally distributed data of similar variance were compared by one- or two-way ANOVA. For multiple comparisons, the Bonferroni’s corrected P value is shown. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 5 or Origin version 6.1. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Values were presented as mean ± SEM.

Results

Similar to what we have recently demonstrated (Egorov et al., 2019), mild stretch (150 mg) did not affect PV electrophysiology at baseline. Changes in RP, APA, and AP duration (APD) were not observed in both PVost and PVdis. In contrast, moderate (10 g) stretch significantly depolarized the RP specifically in PVdis (-56 ± 2 mV vs. -82 ± 1 mV at baseline, P < 0.01) suppressing APA and resulting in inexcitability of PVdis that was evident from a failure of the propagation of excitation toward PVdis (Figure 1). In PVost, neither RP or APA were changed at moderate stretch, while APD was significantly prolonged from 55 ± 2 ms to 84 ± 8 ms, respectively (P < 0.01).

Low concentrations of adrenaline (25–100 nmol/L) depolarized the RP selectively within PVdis (by 26 ± 2 mV at baseline and 18 ± 1 mV at mild stretch, P < 0.001) and did not change the RP in PVost measured during a stable atrial stimulation of S1S1 = 300 ms (Figure 1). This subsequently suppressed an APA in PVdis and resulted in the development of intra-PV conduction dissociation (Figure 2A). At moderate stretch, this further depolarized the RP in the setting of PVdis inexcitability by 5.9 ± 1.1 mV at 10 g, P < 0.01. A brief application of acetylcholine hyperpolarized the RP back to baseline values and successfully recovered PVdis excitability in all preparations (Figure 3B).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Arrhythmic events induced within the pulmonary vein (PV) myocardium by low (25–100 nmol/L) and high (1–10 μmol/L) concentrations of adrenaline in unstretched and stretched (150 mg and 10.5 g) preparations. (A) Arrhythmia score calculated as described in the section “Materials and Methods.” N = 6–7 rats. P values are calculated by repeated measurements two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction. (BD) Representative examples of arrhythmic events recorded in PV preparations under different conditions. Two simultaneous microelectrode recordings from PVdis (top recording in red) and PVost (bottom recording in blue) are shown for each event. (B) A brief application of 1 μmol/L acetylcholine (ACh) in 150 mg stretched preparation hyperpolarized the RP in PVdis back to a baseline level and suppressed spontaneous PV activity (no pacing, NP) under 1 μmol/L adrenaline (Adr) application. After ACh washout, spontaneous slow PV rhythm (arrhythmia score is 3) was suppressed by atrial pacing (S1S1 = 300 ms). (C,D) Stable slow rhythm (arrhythmia score is 4, C) and fast regular rhythm (arrhythmia score is 5, D) induced by 10 μmol/L adrenaline in unstretched (C) and 150 mg stretched (D) PV preparations.

Subsequent application of 1 μmol/L adrenaline recovered PVdis excitability and the intra-PV conduction in all the preparations tested (see representative example in Figure 2B). In unstretched and 150 mg stretched preparations, it was associated with significant RP hyperpolarization and recovery of the APA (P < 0.01) in PVdis. In contrast, in 10 g stretched preparations, recovery of the intra-PV conduction was not associated with changes in the RP and only partial recovery of the APA in PVdis (Figure 1). In PVost, neither RP or APA were changed under 1 and 10 μmol/L adrenaline in both mildly and moderately stretched preparations.

Although 25–100 nmol/L adrenaline could strongly depolarize the RP in PVdis, this was not associated with the induction of automatic activity, both in unstretched and stretched preparations (arrhythmia index of 0.17 ± 0.17, P = 0.340 in unstretched preparations, 0.33 ± 0.21, P = 0.145, and 0.43 ± 0.20, P = 0.055, in 150 mg and 10 g stretched preparations, respectively; no spontaneous activity was observed without adrenaline; Figure 3A). This was opposite to higher concentrations of adrenaline (1–10 μmol/L), which evoked spontaneous activity in all preparations studied, with (unstretched and 150-mg stretched) and without (10-g stretched) concomitant hyperpolarization of the RP (Figures 3C,D). Moderate stretch significantly facilitated the triggering of rapid PV firing by adrenaline (arrhythmia index: 4.4 ± 0.2 vs. 1.3 ± 0.4 in unstretched, P < 0.001, and 1.7 ± 0.8 in mildly stretched preparations, P < 0.005, at 10 μmol/L adrenaline) and induced frequent episodes of intra-PV “echo” beats (Figure 3D) (Egorov et al., 2015; Bun et al., 2018).

Spontaneous activity induced by adrenaline in moderately stretched preparations were characterized by complex interactions between PVdis and PVost. Figure 4A shows an example of the initiation of PV spontaneous activity by application of 10 μmol/L adrenaline in a 10-g stretched preparation that led to irregular atrial extra beats. This activity was not suppressed by LA pacing. Instead, a faster rhythm in PVdis interfered with a slower rate of electrical pacing resulting in frequent atrial extra beats (shown in Figure 4A as red APs in PVost recordings). Atrial extra beats triggered from PVdis had different morphology as shown in the enlarged insert below: while paced APs (blue in PVost recording) followed pacing artifact, triggered extra beats (red in PVost recording) were not synchronized with atrial pacing and not associated with pacing artifacts. Another example shown in Figure 4B demonstrates how atrial beats can initiate arrhythmogenic burst of fast electrical activity in PVdis. Altogether, these findings show how spontaneous activity induced by sympathetic stimulation and facilitated by PV stretch can interfere with a stable atrial rhythm resulting in potentially arrhythmogenic atrial extra beats that can initiate atrial fibrillation.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Complex electrical activity recorded in pulmonary vein (PV) preparations under 10 μmol/L adrenaline applied during 10 g stretch. Two simultaneous microelectrode recordings from PV distal (top recording in red) and PV ostium (bottom recording in blue) are shown. (A) Recovery of intra-PV conduction with arrhythmogenic activity after application of 10 μmol/L adrenaline in 10 g stretched PV. Left panel shows a continuous 1-min recording of adrenaline application, while right panel represents an enlarged section of the left recording indicated by a gray rectangle. Spontaneous activity was induced in distal PV and not suppressed by left atrial (LA) pacing. Instead, a faster rhythm in distal PV interfered with a slower rate of electrical pacing resulting in frequent atrial extra beats (shown as red action potentials in PV ostium recordings; red arrows indicate propagating PV distal beats). (B) Burst of fast electrical activity triggered in distal PV by atrial extra beat interfered with intrinsic PV rhythm.

Discussion

Our findings demonstrate complex interactions between the sympathetic tone and mechanical stretch in the development of arrhythmogenic activity within PVs. First, we found a biphasic effect of adrenaline on PVs; while low concentrations of adrenaline (25–100 nmol/L) depolarized the RP and led to intra-PV conduction dissociation, high doses of adrenaline (1–10 μmol/L) led to RP hyperpolarization and the development of spontaneous electrical potentials within the PV. This biphasic effect of adrenaline could be linked to a dose-dependent activation of predominantly α- at low concentrations and both α- and β-adrenergic receptors at high concentrations (Furchgott, 1967). It was previously shown that stimulation of β-adrenergic receptors decreases the membrane stabilizing outward current IK1 (Braun et al., 1992) and enhances the volume-regulated inward chloride current ICl,swell (Ellershaw et al., 2002) that, together, would lead the RP depolarization as observed here and previously by Doisne et al. (2009). In contrast, stimulation of β-adrenergic receptors by high concentrations of adrenaline would increase IK1 but decrease ICl,swell, hyperpolarizing the RP. Importantly, all these effects were observed under a stable atrial pacing when PV RP did not differ from that measured in the left ventricle as shown here (Figure 1) and previously (Doisne et al., 2009; Egorov et al., 2015).

We also found that pathological (moderate) stretch facilitated the development of arrhythmogenic ectopic activity induced by high concentrations of adrenaline in PVs. At depolarized RPs under stretch, application of adrenaline led to more regular and faster PV automaticity compared with nonstretched conditions (Figure 3A). Interestingly, although both moderate stretch and low concentrations of adrenaline significantly depolarized the RP, those were not associated with the induction of automatic activity and required an application of high concentrations of adrenaline. This indicate a crucial combination of pathologically depolarized RP and enhanced Ca2+ handling to form both a substrate [at cellular as well as tissue levels (Egorov et al., 2019)] and a trigger [in a form of early afterdepolarizations (Patterson et al., 2005)] for a stable spontaneous activity within PVs. As it was shown by Patterson et al. (2005), suppression of ryanodine receptor activity (by ryanodine) or reduction in the transmembrane gradient driving Na/Ca exchange (by increase [Ca2+]o from 1.35 to 5 mM) completely suppressed spontaneous firing from PVs, without changed in RP.

Importantly, spontaneous electrical activity induced in the stretched PV by adrenaline was not suppressed by atrial pacing. Moreover, it led to frequent atrial extra beats that may potentially trigger arrhythmogenic atrial extra beats and thus initiate atrial fibrillation. It should be also noted that myocardium dilation during pressure and/or volume overload of the atria could result in heterogeneous distribution of wall stress creating regions of conduction slowing and thus facilitating the induction of atrial fibrillation by PV extra beats. Altogether, our findings highlight an arrhythmogenic impact of PV stretch in the development of atrial arrhythmias under elevated autonomic tone, which could play a critical role in patients with elevated blood pressure associated with hypertension, heart failure, and valvular disease.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.

Ethics Statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Cardiology Research Center (Moscow, Russia).

Author Contributions

YE, LR, and AG substantially contributed to the conception and design of the work; the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of the data and literature; drafting of the work critically for important intellectual content; providing of approval for publication of the content; and agreeing to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research Grants 17-04-01634 and Scientific Research Work AAAA-A18-118022290082-7 (to LR), and NIH 1R01HL141214-01, AHA 16SDG29120011 and the Wisconsin Partnership Program (to AG).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Arora, R., Verheule, S., Scott, L., Navarrete, A., Katari, V., Wilson, E., et al. (2003). Arrhythmogenic substrate of the pulmonary veins assessed by high-resolution optical mapping. Circulation. 107, 1816–1821.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Braun, A. P., Fedida, D., and Giles, W. R. (1992). Activation of alpha 1-adrenoceptors modulates the inwardly rectifying potassium currents of mammalian atrial myocytes. Pflugers. Arch. 421, 431–439.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Bun, S. S., Latcu, D. G., Wedn, A. M., and Saoudi, N. (2018). Intrapulmonary vein “echo” beats’. HeartRhythm Case Rep. 4, 464–465.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Chen, S. A., Hsieh, M. H., Tai, C. T., Tsai, C. F., Prakash, V. S., Yu, W. C., et al. (1999). Initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating from the pulmonary veins: electrophysiological characteristics, pharmacological responses, and effects of radiofrequency ablation. Circulation. 100, 1879–1886.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Doisne, N., Maupoil, V., Cosnay, P., and Findlay, I. (2009). Catecholaminergic automatic activity in the rat pulmonary vein: electrophysiological differences between cardiac muscle in the left atrium and pulmonary vein. Am. J. Physiol. Heart. Circ. Physiol. 297, H102–H108. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00256.2009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Egorov, Y. V., Kuz’min, V. S., Glukhov, A. V., and Rosenshtraukh, L. V. (2015). Electrophysiological Characteristics, Rhythm, Disturbances and Conduction Discontinuities Under Autonomic Stimulation in the Rat Pulmonary Vein Myocardium. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 26, 1130–1139. doi: 10.1111/jce.12738

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Egorov, Y. V., Lang, D., Tyan, L., Turner, D., Lim, E., Piro, Z. D., et al. (2019). Caveolae-Mediated Activation of Mechanosensitive Chloride Channels in Pulmonary Veins Triggers Atrial Arrhythmogenesis. J. Am. Heart. Assoc. 8, e012748. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012748

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ellershaw, D. C., Greenwood, I. A., and Large, W. A. (2002). Modulation of volume-sensitive chloride current by noradrenaline in rabbit portal vein myocytes. J. Physiol. 542, 537–547.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Furchgott, R. F. (1967). The pharmacological differentiation of adrenergic receptors. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 139, 553–570.

Google Scholar

Haissaguerre, M., Jais, P., Shah, D. C., Takahashi, A., Hocini, M., Quiniou, G., et al. (1998). Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N. Engl. J. Med. 339, 659–666.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Malecot, C. O., Bredeloux, P., Findlay, I., and Maupoil, V. (2015). A TTX-sensitive resting Na+ permeability contributes to the catecholaminergic automatic activity in rat pulmonary vein. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 26, 311–319. doi: 10.1111/jce.12572

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Melnyk, P., Ehrlich, J. R., Pourrier, M., Villeneuve, L., Cha, T. J., and Nattel, S. (2005). Comparison of ion channel distribution and expression in cardiomyocytes of canine pulmonary veins versus left atrium. Cardiovasc. Res. 65, 104–116.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Okamoto, Y., Kawamura, K., Nakamura, Y., and Ono, K. (2014). Pathological impact of hyperpolarization-activated chloride current peculiar to rat pulmonary vein cardiomyocytes. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 66, 53–62. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.11.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pasqualin, C., Yu, A., Malecot, C. O., Gannier, F., Cognard, C., Godin-Ribuot, D., et al. (2018). Structural heterogeneity of the rat pulmonary vein myocardium: consequences on intracellular calcium dynamics and arrhythmogenic potential. Sci. Rep. 8, 3244. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21671-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Patterson, E., Po, S. S., Scherlag, B. J., and Lazzara, R. (2005). Triggered firing in pulmonary veins initiated by in vitro autonomic nerve stimulation. Heart Rhythm. 2, 624–631.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Schotten, U., Verheule, S., Kirchhof, P., and Goette, A. (2011). Pathophysiological mechanisms of atrial fibrillation: a translational appraisal. Physiol. Rev. 91, 265–325. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00031.2009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tsao, H. M., Yu, W. C., Cheng, H. C., Wu, M. H., Tai, C. T., Lin, W. S., et al. (2001). Pulmonary vein dilation in patients with atrial fibrillation: detection by magnetic resonance imaging. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 12, 809–813.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Tsuneoka, Y., Irie, M., Tanaka, Y., Sugimoto, T., Kobayashi, Y., Kusakabe, T., et al. (2017). Permissive role of reduced inwardly-rectifying potassium current density in the automaticity of the guinea pig pulmonary vein myocardium. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 133, 195–202. doi: 10.1016/j.jphs.2016.12.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Walters, T. E., Lee, G., Spence, S., Larobina, M., Atkinson, V., Antippa, P., et al. (2014). Acute atrial stretch results in conduction slowing and complex signals at the pulmonary vein to left atrial junction: insights into the mechanism of pulmonary vein arrhythmogenesis. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 7, 1189–1197. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.114.001894

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: pulmonary veins, stretch, arrhythmia, mechano-electrical response, adrenalin

Citation: Egorov YV, Rosenshtraukh LV and Glukhov AV (2020) Arrhythmogenic Interaction Between Sympathetic Tone and Mechanical Stretch in Rat Pulmonary Vein Myocardium. Front. Physiol. 11:237. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00237

Received: 30 November 2019; Accepted: 02 March 2020;
Published: 26 March 2020.

Edited by:

Gentaro Iribe, Asahikawa Medical University, Japan

Reviewed by:

Ian Findlay, ERL7003 Laboratoire Signalisation et Transports Ioniques Membranaires (STIM), France
Tong Liu, Tianjin Medical University, China

Copyright © 2020 Egorov, Rosenshtraukh and Glukhov. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Alexey V. Glukhov, aglukhov@medicine.wisc.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.