Abstract
Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is a multifaceted class of relapsing-remitting chronic inflammatory conditions where microbiota dysbiosis plays a key role during its onset and progression. The human microbiota is a rich community of bacteria, viruses, fungi, protists, and archaea, and is an integral part of the body influencing its overall homeostasis. Emerging evidence highlights dysbiosis of the archaeome and mycobiome to influence the overall intestinal microbiota composition in health and disease, including IBD, although they remain some of the least understood components of the gut microbiota. Nonetheless, their ability to directly impact the other commensals, or the host, reasonably makes them important contributors to either the maintenance of the mucosal tissue physiology or to chronic intestinal inflammation development. Therefore, the full understanding of the archaeome and mycobiome dysbiosis during IBD pathogenesis may pave the way to the discovery of novel mechanisms, finally providing innovative therapeutic targets that can soon implement the currently available treatments for IBD patients.
Introduction
The human gastrointestinal (GI) tract is the host of 1013-to-1014 microorganisms since birth (Gill et al., 2006) when the GI tract starts being colonized by microbial species, forming the gut microbiota (Barko et al., 2018). Changes in specific microbial species abundances and diversity occur until adulthood when the gut microbiota becomes more stable and in symbiosis with the host (Yatsunenko et al., 2012).
Microbial species composing the gut microbiota include bacteria, protozoa, eukaryotes, fungi, viruses, and archaea (Thursby and Juge, 2017). All these entities interact with each other and with the host, existing in a continuum of predator-prey interactions (Frank et al., 2007) which are pivotal for ensuring human health by participating in a variety of physiological functions, such as regulating host immunity, protection against pathogens, as well as host energy harvesting (Clemente et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2015).
However, symbiotic relationships between microbiota and host may be disrupted by different factors such as antibiotic treatments, dietary habits, lifestyle, environmental triggers, and pathologic conditions leading to gut dysbiosis (Hasan and Yang, 2019), mainly consisting of a reduction of commensal bacteria and increase of enteric pathogens which may lead to disease condition (Hasan and Yang, 2019), such as Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD).
Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) includes two main types of chronic inflammatory conditions, ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) whose aetiopathogenesis is still unknown (Matsuoka and Kanai, 2015; Presti et al., 2019). Although CD and UC differ in disease location and symptoms (Rodrigues et al., 2020), they are both featured by a resolution-failing mucosal immune response (Strober et al., 2007; Shim, 2013), a dysfunctional gut epithelial barrier that fails to defend against pathogens (Presti et al., 2019), and an intestinal dysbiosis (Shim, 2013; Massimino et al., 2021).
Previous studies revealed that IBD patient intestinal microbiota is characterized by a reduced abundance of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, as compared to the healthy individuals, whereas the proportion of Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria are increased (Walker et al., 2011; Dong et al., 2019). Moreover, a lower abundance of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, the main butyrate producer in the human intestine (Lopez-Siles et al., 2017), has been reported for IBD patients as compared to the healthy subjects. Indeed, the reduced levels of this commensal causes reduced levels of butyrate, known as a proinflammatory cytokine inhibitor, thus sustaining, chronic intestinal inflammation (Presti et al., 2019). Interestingly, numerous studies have been associating increased numbers of virulent Escherichia coli strains in IBD patients compared to healthy controls (Mirsepasi-Lauridsen et al., 2019), especially when focusing on IBD patients during disease relapses (Burke and Axon, 1988; Mirsepasi-Lauridsen et al., 2019).
Along with bacteria, the viral component of the gut microbiota, the enteric virome, has been recently characterized as a large and composite community made of both eukaryotic-targeting and prokaryotic-targeting viruses (bacteriophages) (Yue et al., 2019). While bacteriophages contribute to the maintenance of bacterial composition of the gut microbiota and changes in their abundances (virome dysbiosis) may affect bacteria diversity in the GI tract (Lin and Lin, 2019), the gut eukaryotic viruses (Taboada et al., 2021) may exert beneficial effects and directly impact the host’s cells (Ungaro et al., 2019b). Gut virome dysbiosis was reported also in IBD patients and many studies profiled virome composition in the context of GI disease, as extensively reviewed elsewhere (Lin and Lin, 2019; Ungaro et al., 2019a; Massimino et al., 2021).
Despite the extensive analysis of the bacteriome and the virome, archaeome (archaeal components) and mycome (fungal and yeast component) populating the GI tract have been poorly investigated so far, mainly because of the lack of appropriate and reproducible techniques for their profiling (Ungaro et al., 2019a).
This minireview aims to compile all notions depicting these two neglected components of the intestinal microbiota as, on one hand, possible contributors to the maintenance of the intestinal homeostasis and, on the other, precipitators of IBD, eventually prompting future studies toward their better definition and comprehension as actors within the intestinal microbiota.
The Gut Archaeome and the Mycobiome: From Tissue Physiology to Inflammatory Bowel Disease Pathogenesis
The Gut Archaeome
Archaea constitute a domain of single-celled organisms alongside two other domains, eukarya, and bacteria (Woese et al., 1990). Although archaea share some features with both bacteria (lack of nucleus, introns, the presence of a single circular chromosome) and eukaryotes (presence of histones for chromosomal DNA packaging) (Gaci et al., 2014), they are classified as a distinct class of organisms that comprises two major kingdoms: Euryarchaeota encompassing the methanogens and their phenotypically diverse relatives, and Crenarchaeota comprising the relatively tight clustering of extremely thermophilic archaebacteria, whose general phenotype appears to resemble the ancestral phenotype of the Archaea (Woese et al., 1990).
Archaea have the distinctive feature of colonizing a broad range of habitats, because of their evolutionary advantage in using specific pathways metabolizing a versatile panel of energy sources, ranging from the sunlight to both organic and inorganic substances (Valentine, 2007). Now we know that archaea are not only extremophile species colonizing severe environments, but they can be also found in moderate climates and can populate plants and animal intestines, representing an important constituent of the gut microbiota (Janssen and Kirs, 2008; Berg et al., 2016; Raymann et al., 2017).
Previous pieces of evidence positioned the archaeal species as ranging from 0.1 to 21.3% of the microbial entities colonizing the digestive tract (Kim et al., 2020). Recently, the development of culture-independent methods (i.e., Next-Generation Sequencing) has been opening a new horizon for the study of the composition of gut microbiota, where the methanogens have been suggested as a predominant archaeal group among gut microbial entities (Matijašić et al., 2020) and their colonization rate ranges from 25 to 95% of human stools (Stewart et al., 2006; Dridi et al., 2009; Hoffmann et al., 2013). Specifically, methanogens perform anaerobic respiration generating methane as a final product of metabolism (methanogenesis). Indeed, they decrease the gas pressure in the colon by consuming H2 and CO2 to produce methane (Gaci et al., 2014). Therefore, archaeal methanogens are likely to compete with sulfate-reducing bacteria for H2 production in the human colon (Conway de Macario and Macario, 2009). Consequently, unbalance between methanogens and sulfate-reducing bacteria may alter gut mucosal homeostasis, resulting in intestinal dysbiosis.
Detailed analysis of gut archaeome revealed the predominance in the intestine of Methanobrevibacter (M.) smithii and Methanosphaera (M.) stadtmanae species, belonging to the archaeal phylum of Euryarchaeota (Conway de Macario and Macario, 2009; Dridi et al., 2009; Gaci et al., 2014) and likely harboring the strong capability to establish a syntrophic association with several bacterial species (Samuel et al., 2007). Besides these two species, haloarchaea, a non-methanogenic euryarchaeota belonging to the salt-loving family of archaea (Kim et al., 2020) (Figure 1A), and other members of several archaeal orders have been identified as components of the gut microbiota. Among these, methanogenic members of the orders Methanosarcinales, Methanobacteriales, Methanococcales, Methanomicrobiales, and Methanopyrales were found to populate the human gut, along with the members of Desulfurococcales, Sulfolobales, Thermoproteales, Nitrososphaerales, and Halobacteriales orders, also detected in the human intestine (Gaci et al., 2014). A recent work, while confirming an increased prevalence of M. stadtmanae in the majority of human samples, failed to detect any non-methanogenic archaeal lineages (Raymann et al., 2017), unless the Haloferax massiliensis and Haloferax assiliense, demonstrating that halophilic archaea can inhabit the human gut (Khelaifia and Raoult, 2016; Khelaifia et al., 2018).
FIGURE 1
The gut archaeome and mycobiome communities in health and disease. (A) In healthy conditions, the intestinal mucosa is colonized by specific archaeal and fungal species contributing, together with the other components of the microbiota, to the overall gut physiology. The archaeal methanogens [i.e., Methanobrevibacter (M.) smithii and Methanosphaera (M.) stadtmanae species] exist in a syntrophic relationship with bacterial species within the gut. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) as well as hydrogen gas (H2), produced by anaerobic bacterial fermentation, are used by methanogens to decrease the gas pressure in the colon by consuming H2 and CO2 to produce methane. In physiologic conditions, the human gut is also colonized by the haloarchaea. In parallel, the human gut mycobiota is predominantly characterized by Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Candida (C.) albicans, and Saccharomyces (S.) cerevisiae. Fungi can be detected by the host immune system through CLEC7Aa C-type lectin receptor recognizing fungal wall β-glucans. (B) In IBD patient intestine, bacterial dysbiosis may contribute to increased methanogen species abundance, known to likely promote TNF production and activate dendritic cells (DCs), eventually contributing to the inflammatory state of the mucosa. Candida kefyr acts as a probiotic during intestinal inflammation by re-establishing the Bacteroides and Lactobacillales abundances. S. cerevisiae may exert anti-inflammatory effects by stimulating the IL10-production by DCs. This image has been designed using resources from https://www.twinkl.fr/ and https://www.flaticon.com/.
The contribution of the archaeome to the host physiology has not been completely understood, even if some relationship with the metabolism of dietary food has been highlighted, as for the M. smithii, found to trigger calories intake from the diet (Gaci et al., 2014). Moreover, methanogens exist in a syntrophic relationship with bacterial species within the gut. Indeed, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) such as acetate, propionate, and butyrate, as well as hydrogen gas, are produced as a result of anaerobic bacterial fermentation (Samuel and Gordon, 2006). As mentioned above, by eliminating H2 in the colon and thus affecting bacterial energy production, methanogens optimize the energy yield of the entire human microbiota (Chaudhary et al., 2018) (Figure 1A). As another example of host-microbiome interaction perpetuated by archaeal commensals, Methanomassiliicoccus luminyensis, recently isolated from human feces (Borrel et al., 2014), was found as sensitive to human-derived antimicrobial peptides and exhibited low immunogenicity toward human immune cells in vitro, thus perfectly resembling a commensal gut microbe (Bang et al., 2017).
Despite the evidence depicting the archaea as commensals, their role in IBD pathogenesis has not been fully elucidated yet (Aldars-García et al., 2021). Some indications come from studies regarding the M. stadtmanae, found to promote in vitro production of TNF and to be more abundant in IBD patient stools by comparison with the controls, suggesting a possible involvement in gut inflammation (Lecours et al., 2014) (Figure 1B). Importantly, M. stadtmanae was displayed to significantly activate human dendritic cells (Bang et al., 2014), further supporting this archaeon to participate in IBD pathogenesis (Lecours et al., 2014). Also, a recent report showed significantly lower M. smithii levels among IBD patients compared to healthy individuals, while normal M. smithii level was recovered in disease remission (Ghavami et al., 2018).
The recent IBD metatranscriptomics meta-analysis, the IBD TaMMA, analyzing a very large sample size (Massimino et al., 2021), highlighted for the first time differences in archaeome composition between colon and ileum from UC and CD patients. Indeed, such a transcriptome analysis compendium revealed colonic and ileal samples to largely differ in terms of archaeal compositions (Massimino et al., 2021). More interestingly, Nitrosophaerales, Haloferacales, Natrialbales, and Thermococcales were among the most abundant archaea orders in CD ileum, whereas the most abundant orders in UC ileum were Methanococcales, Methanobacteriales, Methanosarcinales, Methanomicrobiales, evidencing the differences between the two diseases in the ileal part, more “methanogenic” in UC. Also, Methanomicrobiales were found higher in UC colons, where it was the sole archaeal order to be statistically significant, while no differences were observed in colons from CD patients. From these insights, we can conclude that each intestinal tract may display differential abundances of archaea not only featuring the specific gut tract, but also the specific disease conditions. Such differences may contribute also to fostering diversified metabolic processes in the different intestinal segments, finally influencing the overall intestinal homeostasis. The archeaome composition in healthy conditions and the changes occurrgin during IBD pathogenesis are summarized in Table 1.
TABLE 1
Microbiota composition in healthy and IBD conditions.
Archaeome and mycobiome species composing the gut microbiota independently of inflammatory conditions are indicated in green. Archaeome and mycobiome species shifts during IBD pathogenesis are indicated in blue and red for the downregulation and upregulation of these microbial entities, respectively.
Notably, the IBD-associated bacterial dysbiosis may contribute to the archaeome composition shift, with an advantage of methylotrophic archaeal species (Figure 1B), particularly M. stadtmanae, finally increasing the inflammatory response within the human gut (Lecours et al., 2014). In this regard, a proposed leading theory explaining the possible contribution of archaea to IBD pathogenesis is that the SCFA butyric acid, produced in the colon by bacterial fermentation of dietary fibers and resistant starch, is a key regulator of syntrophism between archaea and bacteria in the gut (Matijašić et al., 2020). However, the archaeal overgrowth and the subsequent increased removal of SCFA from the biofilms are the two potential factors that cause dysbiosis, triggering bacteria to become endoparasites and enter intestinal epithelial tissues, which in turn leads to inflammatory processes in the human gut (White, 2017) (Figure 1B).
In conclusion, even if a causal link between archaeome dysbiosis and IBD pathogenesis has not been demonstrated yet, the evidence coming from previous studies suggested that archaea may play a major role in both health and IBD conditions. However, the way to the full definition of archaea-triggered mechanisms and functions in the gut is still long and deserves much more attention as a key player in regulating intestinal physiology. Moreover, its dysregulation may contribute, in combination with the other commensals, to sustain gut chronic inflammation, thus resulting important for the better comprehension of IBD pathogenesis and the development of new therapeutic lines of interventions aimed at the reconstitution of the archaeal composition within the intestinal microbiota.
The Gut Mycobiome
Mycobiome is a general designation used for the description of fungal communities (molds and yeasts) of the microbiome (Cui et al., 2013) and is supposed to include nearly 0.1% of the total microbes in the gut (Arumugam et al., 2011; Nash et al., 2017). Mycobiome has been detected in the GI tracts of several mammals including humans, mice, rats, pigs, and many ruminants and non-ruminants (Liggenstoffer et al., 2010; Iliev et al., 2012).
Although most of the fungi-related studies were based on culture-dependent methods (Anderson, 1917), thus hampering the understanding of the fungal community of the microbiota, the recent advance in sequencing techniques (Meyer et al., 2010) has been progressively enlarging our knowledge about the mycobiome composition within the gut (Sokol et al., 2017; Qiu et al., 2020), where a lower diversity of fungal community than the bacterial was found (Nash et al., 2017).
In the human gut, many studies reported Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, and Mortierellomycota as the most dominant phyla of fungi (Qiu et al., 2020), while the most abundant genera composing the gut mycobiome are the Candida (particularly C. albicans), Saccharomyces (particularly S. cerevisiae), Penicillium, Aspergillus, Cryptococcus, Malassezia (particularly M. restricta), Cladosporium, Galactomyces, Debaryomyces, and Trichosporon (Sokol et al., 2017; Qiu et al., 2020) (Figure 1A).
Also, mycobiome entities exist in a tight equilibrium with the host and with the other actors of the intestinal microbiota, such as bacteria, thus altogether contributing to the maintenance of the overall tissue homeostasis (Santus et al., 2021). Evidence from experimental models showed C. Albicans to contribute to the recolonization of the intestine by bacterial species (Bacteroides) after antibiotic treatment (Mason et al., 2012). Interestingly, another study suggested the overall fungal and bacterial composition of the microbiota to be impacted by dietary habits in Japanese and Indian individuals. Results from this study revealed the higher abundance in Indian participants of Candida and Prevotella, maybe resulting from a higher dietary intake of vegetables used as a growth factor by the various Candida species (Pareek et al., 2019).
Some species populating the gut mycobiome were demonstrated to act as probiotics, with therapeutic potential for the host. As an example, the probiotic Saccharomyces (S.) boulardii was found to prevent antibiotic-associated diarrhea (Szajewska and Kołodziej, 2015) by regulating the immune system and by exerting an antimicrobial activity (Kelesidis and Pothoulakis, 2012). Another probiotic species is the Candida kefyr, found to reduce the severity of colitis by decreasing the abundance of Bacteroides and increasing the Lactobacillales (Takata et al., 2015) (Figure 1B). This shift in microbiota composition was associated with a decrease in interleukin (IL) 6 production (Takata et al., 2015). Moreover, it is suggested that fungi can be detected by the host immune system through Dectin-1 (CLEC7A), a c-type lectin receptor recognizing fungal wall β-glucans, resulting in a host immune response (Iliev et al., 2012) (Figure 1A).
Besides this beneficial impact on the host’s health, mycobiome dysbiosis was also associated with IBD. Higher levels of anti-S. cerevisiae antibodies raised against a component of the fungal cell wall were detected in CD patients’ sera compared to controls resulting in a reliable CD biomarker and predictors of the disease course (Quinton et al., 1998).
Reduced fungal diversity and increased abundance of Candida (C.) species were found in both pediatric and adult IBD patients (Figure 1B). More specifically, in adult IBD patients an increased Basidiomycota/Ascomycota ratio was found, coupled with the enrichment of C. albicans and the reduction of S. cerevisiae (Chehoud et al., 2015; Sokol et al., 2017). Moreover, Gibberella Moniliformis, Alternaria Brassicola, Aspergillus clavatus, and the Cystofilobasidiaceae were found to be increased in IBD patients (Liguori et al., 2016), while Malassezia sympodialis was markedly decreased (Hoarau et al., 2016). In CD, C. cropicalis and C. glabrata were found augmented by comparison with the control (Hoarau et al., 2016; Liguori et al., 2016).
Fungal dysbiosis observed in IBD patients was found to be associated also with composition shifts of other microbial compartments. As an example, the reduction of S. cerevisiae was observed in association with the reduction of several bacterial genera, such as Bifidobacterium, Blautia, Roseburia, and Ruminococcus (Qiu et al., 2020).
From a mechanistic point of view, the intestinal mycobiome was delineated also as a contributor during the inflammatory process. For example, by treating bone marrow-derived dendritic cells with two heat-killed yeast strains of S. cerevisiae and C. albicans, Sokol and colleagues found that the IL6 levels were comparable among treatments, but the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL10 was significantly higher after the stimulation with S. cerevisiae by comparison with the C. albicans (Figure 1B), suggesting an anti-inflammatory effect of the former (Sokol et al., 2017).
Additionally, C. tropicalis together with E. coli and Serratia marcescens bacteria were found to form a biofilm functioning as a commensal niche enriched in fungal hyphae, usually increased in pathogenic conditions (Hoarau et al., 2016). Interestingly, C. tropicalis was shown to positively correlate with Serratia marcescens and Escherichia coli in CD, further supporting their role in sustaining chronic inflammation as a “team” in the commensal niche (Hoarau et al., 2016).
The widely accepted mechanisms through which intestinal mycobiota may interact with the host’s mucosal physiology are prevalently based on the interaction between fungal species and innate immunity, involving specific receptors and signals driving the inflammatory response (Mahmoudi et al., 2021).
Among the main types of innate immune receptors that can recognize fungal Pathogen-Associated Molecular Patterns (PAMPs), Toll-Like Receptors (TLRs), C-type lectin receptors (CLRs), NOD-like receptors (NLRs), and galectin 3 on antigen-presenting cells are well recognized and characterized (Bourgeois and Kuchler, 2012). The most investigated belonging to the CLRs include Dectin-1, recognizing the PAMP β-glucan (Taylor et al., 2007), Dectin-2, Dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-3-grabbing non-integrin receptor (DC-SIGN), Macrophage inducible Ca2+-dependent lectin receptor (MINCLE), suggested to recognize the α-mannose (Yamasaki et al., 2009), the Mannose Receptor (MR). Some of CLRs were found to directly interact with TLRs to recognize fungi (Vautier et al., 2012). Within the intestine, also, the fractalkine receptor (CX3CR-1) expressed by resident mononuclear phagocytes was recently discovered to mediate the interaction between the intestinal mycobiota and host immunity in both health conditions and inflammatory state (Leonardi et al., 2018). The proposed mechanism through which fungal recognition by immune cells triggers an innate immunity cascade occurs through the activation of the spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) or the SYK-independent RAF-1 activation, which ultimately trigger the NF-κB signaling pathway toward T helper 1 and/or T helper 17 immunophenotypes (Richard and Sokol, 2019).
Susceptibility against mycobiome-related complications in IBD patients may rely on the genetic alteration within fungal recognition receptors-encoding genes. As some examples, polymorphisms in genes encoding for Detectin-1, TLR-1 and 3, MINCLE, Caspase recruitment domain-containing protein 9 (CARD9), Dectin-1, CD209, and CX3CR1 are the most investigated as associated with fungal dysbiosis/altered innate immunity during IBD pathogenesis (Iliev et al., 2012; Sokol et al., 2017; Leonardi et al., 2018; Limon et al., 2019).
The majority of the studies reported so far elucidated the mycobiome composition in small sample-sized IBD patient cohorts, mainly on stools and exploiting targeted DNA sequencing and PCR (Mahmoudi et al., 2021). By contrast, IBD TaMMA (Massimino et al., 2021) highlighted CD and UC ilea both featuring an increased abundance of Glomerellales, Tremellales, and Hypocreales, coupled with decreased abundance of Schizosaccharomycetales. Some orders were instead differentially abundant in the two conditions. Saccharomycetales, Ustilaginales, Malasseziales, Eurotiales, Mycosphaerellales, and Magnaporthales were found to be differentially abundant exclusively in UC ileum, while Saccharomycetales, Ustilaginales, and Sordariales were dysregulated only in CD ileum. Interestingly, differently from the ileal tract, very few orders were found to be differentially abundant in colons, perhaps resembling the different immune competence of the two tissues (Mann et al., 2016).
The mycobiome composition in healthy conditions and during IBD pathogenesis are summarized in Table 1.
Besides the long list of results coming from experimental colitis models extensively narrated by Beheshti-Maal and colleagues (Beheshti-Maal et al., 2021) and discussed later in this review, the real link between IBD pathogenesis and mycobiome dysbiosis is still missing, although some evidence lied ahead. Indeed, by combining the results from previous studies, fungal dysbiosis has been emerging to likely modulate the IBD bacteriome (Iliev and Leonardi, 2017), known to be pivotal in chronic inflammation onset and perpetuation as much as the immune system (Iliev and Leonardi, 2017). In this regard, in a study comparing samples from CD patients and their not-affected relatives, the inter- and intra-kingdom interactions between bacteriome and mycobiome were proposed to impact the host’s immune system in the setting of CD. Specifically, C. tropicalis interacts with potential bacterial pathogens, and that these interactions may play an important role in CD pathogenesis (Hoarau et al., 2016). Of note, the authors also indicated the microbiotas, specifically the mycobiomes, of familial samples as distinct from the non-familial (Hoarau et al., 2016). This may be partially explained by the consensus that members of a family share genetics, environment, diet, and bacterial microbiota being more similar to each other than they are to the unrelated individuals (Schloss et al., 2014).
Additionally, mycobiome entities were proposed to directly intervene in the release of IBD-specific proinflammatory cytokines (Beheshti-Maal et al., 2021), as suggested by the correlation found between specific gut mycobiome compositions with the expression levels of a series of pro-inflammatory cytokines in UC inflamed mucosa (Qiu et al., 2017). As a consequence, it is reasonable to indicate the mycobiome composition alterations, such as the increased abundances of Candida species often found in IBD mucosa, to be associated with inflammation and disease severity, as previously shown by Li and colleagues (Li et al., 2014). Consistently, Kowalska-Duplaga and colleagues observed that the abundance of Candida in CD patients decreased during the therapeutic intervention, particularly with anti-TNFα treatment (Kowalska-Duplaga et al., 2019), indicating a possible direct link between pro-inflammatory conditions and mycobiome composition. Besides the IBD-associated Candida species enrichment, an unbalanced Basidiomycota/Ascomycota ratio was also observed to correlate with flare-up/remission conditions in IBD (Sokol et al., 2017).
Overall, these pieces of evidence, although not specifically defining the mycobiome-triggered functional mechanisms underlying IBD pathogenesis, propose the mycobiome as important as the other microbiota compartments in orchestrating and contributing to the chronic gut inflammation onset and perpetuation, thus opening additional horizons for the investigation of IBD-associated microbiota diversity.
Major Challenges in Studying Mycobiome and Archeome
Even if archaea resemble bacteria as we discussed above, they are so evolutionarily distant from bacteria that they retain some eukaryotic traits (i.e., molecular machinery for transmission and manipulation of genetic information) (Borrel et al., 2020). Such diversity makes challenging their detection and analysis if bacteria-centric methodologies are exploited, such as the nucleic-acid-based fluorescence in situ hybridization, cultivation, and molecular quantitative analyses. In the majority of commercially available kits for DNA extraction, for example, lysozyme is one of the most-used components. However, this is not suitable for archaeal DNA extraction since it cannot disrupt archaeal pseudo-peptidoglycan (Borrel et al., 2020). Indeed, more aggressive treatments may be required for archaeal cell wall break, as in the case of Methanobacteriales (Lee et al., 2009). No fewer difficulties are encountered while performing molecular analysis, where the so-called “universal” 16S rRNA primers fail to cover the broad archaeal diversity and to correctly annotate certain archaeal lineages (Mahnert et al., 2018). This hurdle is even huger if we consider the limited availability of well-annotated genomes in under-represented archaeal phyla, eventually failing to correctly assign archaeal sequences (Mahnert et al., 2018).
Similar limitations are met when fungi should be analyzed. Although some fungal entities can be cultured in vitro (Chevalier et al., 2018) and used to manipulate animal models as we discussed later in this review, there are significantly few complete fungal genomes yet available (Underhill and Iliev, 2014), making also their classification challenging. The approach most commonly used for fungal analysis is to amplify the fungal “internal transcribed spacer” (ITS) regions (Tang et al., 2015). Since the ITS regions are not part of the conserved transcribed regions of the structural ribosomal RNAs, they are highly divergent between fungi, allowing their classification at the species level. However, fungal ITS sequences can differ widely in size and sequence content (Santamaria et al., 2012) and there is no well-established database of ITS sequences (Tang et al., 2015).
As a matter of fact, in both mycobiome and archaeome contexts, the use of metatranscriptomics may help to better classify and annotate the fungal and archaeal composition of the gut microbiota, as we recently reported in IBD TaMMA (Massimino et al., 2021). However, much more effort in developing and improving both sequencing and cultivation approaches is required to make plausible the mycobiome and archaeome studies to unravel their physiological properties. This also represents a major limitation that renders the animal and human studies for elucidating their role during intestinal inflammation harder, as we discuss shortly.
The Role of Mycobiome and Archaeome During Intestinal Inflammation: Evidence From Animal Studies
The Mycobiome in Experimental Colitis
Whether on one hand human studies are relevant from a clinical point of view, unfortunately, they cannot provide mechanistic and functional notions that may help to determine whether gut mycobiota and archaeome dysbiosis are causal for intestinal inflammation onset and progression or this is only a consequence associated with the inflammatory process. Over the years, the established models of experimental colitis have been offering the chance to depict a more comprehensive view of the entire process involving intestinal microbiota in the aetiogenesis of gut inflammation, mainly illustrating the intestinal bacteriome roles (Zhang et al., 2017) and, to a lesser extent, the mycobiome and archaeome functions. As an example, Qiu and colleagues reported how the fungal composition of the GI tract may change during Dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis, finally uncovering that, while fungi were higher in the ileal tract by comparison with the colon independently of the inflammation state, the fungal Shannon diversity index of the DSS-induced colitis mice was lower than the controls in each gut segment (Qiu et al., 2015). Additionally, the inflammatory process caused a fungal translocation from the gut lumen to extra-enteric organs (such as the spleen and the mesenteric lymph node) during the experimental model of chronic colitis only in the inflamed intestinal tracts (Qiu et al., 2015), indicating that the inflammatory process itself may accelerate distal fungal invasion, likely because of the increased intestinal permeability. In line with previous evidence, the authors also showed that the fungal depletion was paralleled with a shift in mucosal bacterial composition (Qiu et al., 2015).
The direct association between fungi and bacteria during experimental intestinal inflammation was shown in another recent study highlighting Enterobacteriaceae to have a positive effect on fungal colonization of the gut, finally influencing the progression of gut inflammation. Indeed, C. albicans requires the presence of specific bacteria that trigger intestinal inflammation to increase the intensity, so that antibiotic treatment resulted as beneficial against DSS-induced colitis (Sovran et al., 2018). Also, C. albicans colonization of mouse intestines induced a strong Th17 response, suggesting that fungal composition infer specific immune changes in the host. Furthermore, Chiaro and colleagues in 2017 demonstrated that increased intestinal colonization with S. cerevisiae aggravated colitis by influencing purine metabolism, leading to extensive damage of the gut epithelia, reversible thanks to the inhibition of the purine pathway (Chiaro et al., 2017). These results further strengthened the concept that a tight interaction between mycobiota and the host’s metabolism exists, overall influencing the host’s physiology.
The Archaea in Experimental Colitis
While some studies about fungi are existing in the context of experimental colitis, fewer pieces of evidence described the functional contribution by archaea during gut inflammation in vivo. This is mainly due to the difficulty in isolating archaeal species (Vemuri et al., 2020), and thus the functional studies in vivo manipulating the archaeome composition are still missing. Nevertheless, a very recent study reported its characterization in animals. Indeed, Mohamed and colleagues found methanogens to be increased during experimental colitis, coupled with bacterial dysbiosis, thus confirming the importance of archaeome-bacteriome equilibrium also in vivo (Mohamed et al., 2021).
Moreover, previous evidence reported that Methanobrevibacter smithii contributed to digestive health by directing Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron-mediated fermentation of dietary fructans to acetate, and in turn B. thetaiotaomicron-derived formate fostered M. smithii for methanogenesis, thus demonstrating a link between this archaeon and bacterial utilization in balancing host’s metabolism (Samuel and Gordon, 2006). Although this study did not demonstrate the effect of methanogens during intestinal inflammation, it does propose their contribution to metabolic health, suggesting their involvement in maintaining tissue physiology.
Conclusively, the paucity of studies about mycobiome and archaeome manipulation in vivo during intestinal inflammation strongly suggests that there is an urgent need to enlarge the knowledge about the mechanism directed by these two neglected components of the intestinal microbiota to make a step forward to the full comprehension of the entire microbiota-mediated mechanism in health and disease.
Manipulating the Gut Mycobiome and Archaeome for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Evidence From Clinical Trials
Alteration in gut microbiota compositions during IBD pathogenesis and the evidence that specific microbial entities may result beneficial, or detrimental, have been leading over the years to the development of an enormous number of clinical trials, as those assessing the efficacy of the Fecal Microbiota Transplant (FMT) (Oka and Sartor, 2020). Reasonably, FMT exerts beneficial effects by transferring fecal microbiota from a healthy individual to an IBD patient, re-establishing the correct balance among microbial entities in the gut. Also, antibiotics are used as primary therapy for inducing or maintaining remission based on the hypothesis that certain bacteria cause IBD (Sartor and Wu, 2017). Likewise, virome modulation has been proposed as beneficial by administering CD patients with a bacteriophage cocktail parasitizing adhesive-invasive E. coli. Currently, this approach is under investigation in a clinical trial (NCT03808103) (Ungaro et al., 2019a).
Regarding the modulation of fungal composition, treatments may encompass some anti-fungal medications. Specifically, the NCT03476317 small pilot study has completed the recruitment of patients to determine the effect of a novel gut microbiota-targeted therapeutic regimen (bowel lavage and antibiotics with or without the antifungal fluconazole) in the management of active CD or indeterminate colitis (IBDU) that is refractory to conventional, immunosuppressive therapy.
Among future clinical trials, the NCT05049525, not recruiting yet, aims at the evaluation of the response of the combined anti-fungal itraconazole and terbinafine therapies compared to placebo in patients with CD, further strengthening the concept that targeting fungal entities in these patients may help their remission. Similarly, the NCT04966585 pilot study, not recruiting yet, will investigate whether the microbial changes induced by antifungal treatment are associated with dampened downstream immune responses in CD patients with a genetic predisposition to developing strong immune responses to Malassezia.
It is noteworthy that the use of probiotics, including live biotherapeutic products (LBPs) based on bacterial- and fungal-derived molecules, is establishing a new line of treatment of IBD patients (Oka and Sartor, 2020). In specific regard to fungal-derived factors, a randomized clinical trial assessing the efficacy of Saccharomyces boulardii, Plein and colleagues observed an improved disease activity index in a cohort of CD patients (Plein and Hotz, 1993). Similar trials have been performed later, in CD patients, highlighting improved relapse rate (Guslandi et al., 2000) and intestinal permeability (Garcia Vilela et al., 2008).
The possibility to target archaeome is more challenging. Indeed, human methanogenic archaea are highly resistant to antibiotics (Dridi et al., 2011), being susceptible only to molecules that are also effective against both bacteria and eukarya, thus hampering a possible specific therapy. Quite recently, however, statins have been elucidated as inhibitors of archaeal cell membrane biosynthesis without affecting bacterial numbers, opening the possibility of a therapeutic intervention that targets a specific aetiological factor while protecting the intestinal microbiome (Gottlieb et al., 2016). This may be the starting point also for the modulation of the archaeome in IBD patients as a therapeutic intervention, even if the route to success is still long and much more effort and attention to this aspect for IBD treatment need to be dedicated.
Concluding Remarks
Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is a complex disease where different factors, ranging from cytokines, molecules, to immune cells and microbial entities, play major roles in directing and sustaining chronic inflammation. Despite the enormous number of studies aimed and the definition of its aetiogenesis, at present, IBD is dominated by repetitive technology-based analyses of gut dysbiosis and by clinical trials based on the cyclical blockade of an endless series of cytokines, signaling molecules, and homing receptors. It is evident that the field of IBD currently lacks fresh concepts and original discoveries. Hence, more NGS-based investigations for the elucidation of the mechanisms sustained by intestinal microbiota components are urgently needed to lay down new hypotheses and raise theories delineating the IBD aetiopathogenesis. At the same time, more animal studies are required to further elucidate functions and mechanisms mediated by all components of the intestinal microbiota, including the more neglected such as fungi and archaea.
In this direction, the full comprehension of all microbiota components that may cause IBD onset and progression will help to develop novel therapeutic strategies that will finally consider IBD in its real nature, that is complexity and heterogeneity. Establishing how the diverse microbial commensals interact with each other and with the host is the basis for solving this complexity, finally leading to tailored therapies considering patient-specific characteristics within the intestinal microbiota.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Author contributions
YH, LM, LL, and FU: conceptualization and writing, review, and editing. SD and FU: supervision, review, and editing. FU: funding acquisition. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge support from the “Fondazione Cariplo per la ricerca Biomedica” under grant agreement #2018-0112 to FU, “Fondazione AMICI ONLUS” for Research Prize 2020 to FU.
Conflict of interest
SD has served as a speaker, consultant, and advisory board member for Schering Plough, Abbott (AbbVie) Laboratories, Merck and Co, UCB Pharma, Ferring, Cellerix, Millenium Takeda, Nycomed, Pharmacosmos, Actelion, Alfa Wasserman, Genentech, Grunenthal, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, Vifor, and Johnson and Johnson. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
Aldars-GarcíaL.ChaparroM.GisbertJ. P. (2021). Systematic review: the gut microbiome and its potential clinical application in inflammatory bowel disease.Microorganisms91–43. 10.3390/microorganisms9050977
2
AndersonH. (1917). Yeast-like fungi of the tinal tract.J. Infect. Dis.21341–354.
3
ArumugamM.RaesJ.PelletierE.PaslierD. L. E.YamadaT.MendeD. R.et al (2011). Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome.Nature473174–180.
4
BangC.VierbuchenT.GutsmannT.HeineH.SchmitzR. A. (2017). Immunogenic properties of the human gut-associated archaeon Methanomassiliicoccus luminyensis and its susceptibility to antimicrobial peptides.PLoS One12:e0185919. 10.1371/journal.pone.0185919
5
BangC.WeidenbachK.GutsmannT.HeineH.SchmitzR. A. (2014). The intestinal archaea Methanosphaera stadtmanae and Methanobrevibacter smithii activate human dendritic cells.PLoS One9:e99411. 10.1371/journal.pone.0099411
6
BarkoP. C.McMichaelM. A.SwansonK. S.WilliamsD. A. (2018). The gastrointestinal microbiome: a review.J Vet Intern Med.329–25.
7
Beheshti-MaalA.ShahrokhS.AnsariS.MirsamadiE. S.YadegarA.MirjalaliH.et al (2021). Gut mycobiome: the probable determinative role of fungi in IBD patients.Mycoses64468–476. 10.1111/myc.13238
8
BergG.RybakovaD.GrubeM.KöberlM. (2016). The plant microbiome explored: implications for experimental botany.J. Exp. Bot.67995–1002. 10.1093/jxb/erv466
9
BorrelG.BrugèreJ.-F.GribaldoS.SchmitzR. A.Moissl-EichingerC. (2020). The host-associated archaeome.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.18622–636. 10.1038/s41579-020-0407-y
10
BorrelG.ParisotN.HarrisH. M. B.PeyretailladeE.GaciN.TotteyW.et al (2014). Comparative genomics highlights the unique biology of Methanomassiliicoccales, a Thermoplasmatales-related seventh order of methanogenic archaea that encodes pyrrolysine.BMC Genomics15:679. 10.1186/1471-2164-15-679
11
BourgeoisC.KuchlerK. (2012). Fungal pathogens—a sweet and sour treat for toll-like receptors.Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol.2:142. 10.3389/fcimb.2012.00142
12
BurkeD. A.AxonA. T. R. (1988). Adhesive Escherichia coli in inflammatory bowel disease and infective diarrhoea.Br. Med. J.297102–104. 10.1136/bmj.297.6641.102
13
ChaudharyP. P.ConwayP. L.SchlundtJ. (2018). Methanogens in humans: potentially beneficial or harmful for health.Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.1023095–3104. 10.1007/s00253-018-8871-2
14
ChehoudC.AlbenbergL. G.JudgeC.HoffmannC.GrunbergS.BittingerK.et al (2015). Fungal signature in the gut microbiota of pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Inflamm. Bowel Dis.211948–1956. 10.1097/mib.0000000000000454
15
ChevalierM.RanqueS.PrêcheurI. (2018). Oral fungal-bacterial biofilm models in vitro: a review.Med. Mycol.56653–667.
16
ChiaroT. R.SotoR.Zac StephensW.KubinakJ. L.PetersenC.GogokhiaL.et al (2017). A member of the gut mycobiota modulates host purine metabolism exacerbating colitis in mice.Sci. Transl. Med.9:eaaf9044. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf9044
17
ClementeJ. C.UrsellL. K.ParfreyL. W.KnightR. (2012). The impact of the gut microbiota on human health: an integrative view.Cell1481258–1270. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.035
18
Conway de MacarioE.MacarioA. J. L. (2009). Methanogenic archaea in health and disease: a novel paradigm of microbial pathogenesis.Int. J. Med. Microbiol.29999–108. 10.1016/j.ijmm.2008.06.011
19
CuiL.MorrisA.GhedinE. (2013). The human mycobiome in health and disease.Genome Med.51–12.
20
DongL. N.WangM.GuoJ.WangJ. P. (2019). Role of intestinal microbiota and metabolites in inflammatory bowel disease.Chin. Med. J.1321610–1614. 10.1097/cm9.0000000000000290
21
DridiB.FardeauM.-L.OllivierB.RaoultD.DrancourtM. (2011). The antimicrobial resistance pattern of cultured human methanogens reflects the unique phylogenetic position of archaea.J. Antimicrob. Chemother.662038–2044. 10.1093/jac/dkr251
22
DridiB.HenryM.El KhéchineA.RaoultD.DrancourtM. (2009). High prevalence of Methanobrevibacter smithii and Methanosphaera stadtmanae detected in the human gut using an improved DNA detection protocol.PLoS One4:e7063. 10.1371/journal.pone.0007063
23
FrankD. N.St. AmandA. L.FeldmanR. A.BoedekerE. C.HarpazN.PaceN. R. (2007). Molecular-phylogenetic characterization of microbial community imbalances in human inflammatory bowel diseases.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10413780–13785.
24
GaciN.BorrelG.TotteyW.O’TooleP. W.BrugèreJ. F. (2014). Archaea and the human gut: New beginning of an old story.World J. Gastroenterol.2016062–16078. 10.3748/wjg.v20.i43.16062
25
Garcia VilelaE.De Lourdes De Abreu FerrariM.Oswaldo Da Gama TorresH.Guerra PintoA.Carolina Carneiro AguirreA.Paiva MartinsF.et al (2008). Influence of Saccharomyces boulardii on the intestinal permeability of patients with Crohn’s disease in remission.Scand. J. Gastroenterol.43842–848. 10.1080/00365520801943354
26
GhavamiS. B.RostamiE.SephayA. A.ShahrokhS.BalaiiH.AghdaeiH. A.et al (2018). Alterations of the human gut Methanobrevibacter smithii as a biomarker for inflammatory bowel diseases.Microb. Pathog.117285–289. 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.01.029
27
GillS. R.PopM.DeBoyR. T.EckburgP. B.TurnbaughP. J.SamuelB. S.et al (2006). Metagenomic analysis of the human distal gut microbiome.Science3121355–1359.
28
GottliebK.WacherV.SlimanJ.PimentelM. (2016). Review article: inhibition of methanogenic archaea by statins as a targeted management strategy for constipation and related disorders.Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther.43197–212. 10.1111/apt.13469
29
GuslandiM.MezziG.SorghiM.TestoniP. A. (2000). Saccharomyces boulardii in maintenance treatment of Crohn’s disease.Dig. Dis. Sci.451462–1464. 10.1023/a:1005588911207
30
HasanN.YangH. (2019). Factors affecting the composition of the gut microbiota, and its modulation.PeerJ20191–31.
31
HoarauG.MukherjeeP. K.Gower-RousseauC.HagerC.ChandraJ.RetuertoM. A.et al (2016). Bacteriome and mycobiome interactions underscore microbial dysbiosis in familial Crohn’s disease.mBio7:e01250-16. 10.1128/mBio.01250-16
32
HoffmannC.DolliveS.GrunbergS.ChenJ.LiH.WuG. D.et al (2013). Archaea and fungi of the human gut microbiome: correlations with diet and bacterial residents.PLoS One8:e66019. 10.1371/journal.pone.0066019
33
IlievI. D.FunariV. A.TaylorK. D.NguyenQ.ReyesC. N.StromS. P.et al (2012). Interactions between commensal fungi and the C-type lectin receptor dectin-1 influence colitis.Science3361314–1317. 10.1126/science.1221789
34
IlievI. D.LeonardiI. (2017). Fungal dysbiosis: immunity and interactions at mucosal barriers.Nat. Rev. Immunol.17635–646.
35
JanssenP. H.KirsM. (2008). Structure of the archaeal community of the rumen.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.743619–3625.
36
KelesidisT.PothoulakisC. (2012). Efficacy and safety of the probiotic Saccharomyces boulardii for the prevention and therapy of gastrointestinal disorders.Ther. Adv. Gastroenterol.5111–125. 10.1177/1756283x11428502
37
KhelaifiaS.CaputoA.AndrieuC.CadoretF.ArmstrongN.MichelleC.et al (2018). Genome sequence and description of Haloferax massiliense sp. nov., a new halophilic archaeon isolated from the human gut.Extremophiles22485–498. 10.1007/s00792-018-1011-1
38
KhelaifiaS.RaoultD. (2016). Haloferax massiliensis sp. nov., the first human-associated halophilic archaea.New Microb. New Infect.1296–98. 10.1016/j.nmni.2016.05.007
39
KimJ. Y.WhonT. W.LimM. Y.KimY. B.KimN.KwonM. S.et al (2020). The human gut archaeome: identification of diverse haloarchaea in Korean subjects.Microbiome81–17. 10.1186/s40168-020-00894-x
40
Kowalska-DuplagaK.KrawczykA.Sroka-OleksiakA.SalamonD.WedrychowiczA.FyderekK.et al (2019). Dependence of colonization of the large intestine by candida on the treatment of Crohn’s disease.Polish J. Microbiol.68121–126. 10.21307/pjm-2019-014
41
LecoursP. B.MarsolaisD.CormierY.BerberiM.HachéC.BourdagesR.et al (2014). Increased prevalence of methanosphaera stadtmanae in inflammatory bowel diseases.PLoS One9:e87734. 10.1371/journal.pone.0087734
42
LeeZ. M.-P.BussemaC.SchmidtT. M. (2009). rrnDB: documenting the number of rRNA and tRNA genes in bacteria and archaea.Nucleic Acids Res.37D489–D493. 10.1093/nar/gkn689
43
LeonardiI.LiX.SemonA.LiD.DoronI.PutzelG.et al (2018). CX3CR1 + mononuclear phagocytes control immunity to intestinal fungi.Science359232–236. 10.1126/science.aao1503
44
LiQ.WangC.TangC.HeQ.LiN.LiJ. (2014). Dysbiosis of gut fungal microbiota is associated with mucosal inflammation in Crohn’s disease.J. Clin. Gastroenterol.48513–523. 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000035
45
LiggenstofferA. S.YoussefN. H.CougerM. B.ElshahedM. S. (2010). Phylogenetic diversity and community structure of anaerobic gut fungi (phylum Neocallimastigomycota) in ruminant and non-ruminant herbivores.ISME J.41225–1235. 10.1038/ismej.2010.49
46
LiguoriG.LamasB.RichardM. L.BrandiG.da CostaG.HoffmannT. W.et al (2016). Fungal dysbiosis in mucosa-associated microbiota of Crohn’s disease patients.J. Crohn’s Colitis10296–305. 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjv209
47
LimonJ. J.TangJ.LiD.WolfA. J.MichelsenK. S.FunariV.et al (2019). Malassezia is associated with Crohn’s disease and exacerbates colitis in mouse models.Cell Host Microbe25377–388. 10.1016/j.chom.2019.01.007
48
LinD. M.LinH. C. (2019). A theoretical model of temperate phages as mediators of gut microbiome dysbiosis.F1000Research8:F1000 Faculty Rev-997. 10.12688/f1000research.18480.1
49
Lopez-SilesM.DuncanS. H.Garcia-GilL. J.Martinez-MedinaM. (2017). Faecalibacterium prausnitzii: from microbiology to diagnostics and prognostics.ISME J.11841–852. 10.1038/ismej.2016.176
50
MahmoudiE.MozhganiS. H.SharifinejadN. (2021). The role of mycobiota-genotype association in inflammatory bowel diseases: a narrative review.Gut Pathog.131–9. 10.1186/s13099-021-00426-4
51
MahnertA.BlohsM.PausanM.-R.Moissl-EichingerC. (2018). The human archaeome: methodological pitfalls and knowledge gaps.Emerg. Top. Life Sci.2469–482. 10.1042/ETLS20180037
52
MannE. R.BernardoD.EnglishN. R.LandyJ.Al-HassiH. O.PeakeS. T. C.et al (2016). Compartment-specific immunity in the human gut: properties and functions of dendritic cells in the colon versus the ileum.Gut65256–270. 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307916
53
MasonK. L.DownwardJ. R. E.MasonK. D.FalkowskiN. R.EatonK. A.KaoJ. Y.et al (2012). Candida albicans and bacterial microbiota interactions in the cecum during recolonization following broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy.Infect. Immun.803371–3380. 10.1128/IAI.00449-12
54
MassiminoL.LamparelliL. A.HoushyarY.D’AlessioS.Peyrin-BirouletL.VetranoS.et al (2021). The inflammatory bowel disease transcriptome and metatranscriptome meta-analysis (IBD TaMMA) framework.Nat. Comput. Sci.1511–515. 10.1038/s43588-021-00114-y
55
MatijašićM.MeštrovićT.PaljetakH. ÈPerićM.BarešićA.VerbanacD. (2020). Gut microbiota beyond bacteria-mycobiome, virome, archaeome, and eukaryotic parasites in IBD.Int. J. Mol. Sci.211–21. 10.3390/ijms21082668
56
MatsuokaK.KanaiT. (2015). The gut microbiota and inflammatory bowel disease.Semin. Immunopathol.3747–55.
57
MeyerA.TodtC.MikkelsenN. T.LiebB. (2010). Fast evolving 18S rRNA sequences from Solenogastres (Mollusca) resist standard PCR amplification and give new insights into mollusk substitution rate heterogeneity.BMC Evol. Biol.10:70. 10.1186/1471-2148-10-70
58
Mirsepasi-LauridsenH. C.VallanceB. A.KrogfeltK. A.PetersenA. M. (2019). Escherichia coli pathobionts associated with inflammatory bowel disease.Clin. Microbiol. Rev.321–16. 10.1128/CMR.00060-18
59
MohamedS. S.AbdeltawabN. F.WadieW.AhmedL. A.AmmarR. M.RabiniS.et al (2021). Effect of the standard herbal preparation, STW5, treatment on dysbiosis induced by dextran sodium sulfate in experimental colitis.BMC Complement. Med. Ther.21:168. 10.1186/s12906-021-03337-8
60
NashA. K.AuchtungT. A.WongM. C.SmithD. P.GesellJ. R.RossM. C.et al (2017). The gut mycobiome of the Human Microbiome Project healthy cohort.Microbiome5:153.
61
OkaA.SartorR. B. (2020). Microbial-based and microbial-targeted therapies for inflammatory bowel diseases.Dig. Dis. Sci.65757–788. 10.1007/s10620-020-06090-z
62
PareekS.KurakawaT.DasB.MotookaD.NakayaS.Rongsen-ChandolaT.et al (2019). Comparison of Japanese and Indian intestinal microbiota shows diet-dependent interaction between bacteria and fungi.NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes5:37. 10.1038/s41522-019-0110-9
63
PleinK.HotzJ. (1993). Therapeutic effects of Saccharomyces boulardii on mild residual symptoms in a stable phase of Crohn’s disease with special respect to chronic diarrhea–a pilot study.Z. Gastroenterol.31129–134.
64
PrestiA. L. O.ZorziF.Del ChiericoF.AltomareA.CoccaS.AvolaA.et al (2019). Fecal and mucosal microbiota profiling in irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease.Front. Microbiol.10:1655. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01655
65
QiuX.MaJ.JiaoC.MaoX.ZhaoX.LuM.et al (2017). Alterations in the mucosa-associated fungal microbiota in patients with ulcerative colitis.Oncotarget8107577–107588.
66
QiuX.ZhangF.YangX.WuN.JiangW.LiX.et al (2015). Changes in the composition of intestinal fungi and their role in mice with dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis.Sci. Rep.5:10416.
67
QiuX.ZhaoX.CuiX.MaoX.TangN.JiaoC.et al (2020). Characterization of fungal and bacterial dysbiosis in young adult Chinese patients with Crohn’s disease.Ther. Adv. Gastroenterol.13:1756284820971202.
68
QuintonJ. F.SendidB.ReumauxD.DuthilleulP.CortotA.GrandbastienB.et al (1998). Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae manna antibodies combined with antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies in inflammatory bowel disease: prevalence and diagnostic role.Gut42788–791. 10.1136/gut.42.6.788
69
RaymannK.MoellerA. H.GoodmanA. L.OchmanH. (2017). Unexplored archaeal diversity in the great ape gut microbiome.mSphere2:e00026-17. 10.1128/mSphere.00026-17
70
RichardM. L.SokolH. (2019). The gut mycobiota: insights into analysis, environmental interactions and role in gastrointestinal diseases.Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.16331–345.
71
RodriguesB. L.MazzaroM. C.NagasakoC. K.AyrizonoM. L. S.FagundesJ. J.LealR. F. (2020). Assessment of disease activity in inflammatory bowel diseases: non-invasive biomarkers and endoscopic scores.World J. Gastrointest. Endosc.12504–520.
72
SamuelB. S.GordonJ. I. (2006). A humanized gnotobiotic mouse model of host-archaeal-bacterial mutualism.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10310011–10016. 10.1073/pnas.0602187103
73
SamuelB. S.HansenE. E.ManchesterJ. K.CoutinhoP. M.HenrissatB.FultonR.et al (2007). Genomic and metabolic adaptations of Methanobrevibacter smithii to the human gut.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10410643–10648. 10.1073/pnas.0704189104
74
SantamariaM.FossoB.ConsiglioA.De CaroG.GrilloG.LicciulliF.et al (2012). Reference databases for taxonomic assignment in metagenomics.Brief. Bioinform.13682–695.
75
SantusW.DevlinJ. R.BehnsenJ. (2021). Crossing kingdoms: how the mycobiota and fungal-bacterial interactions impact host health and disease.Infect. Immun.89:e00648-20. 10.1128/IAI.00648-20
76
SartorR. B.WuG. D. (2017). Roles for intestinal bacteria, viruses, and fungi in pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases and therapeutic approaches.Gastroenterology152327–339. 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.10.012
77
SchlossP. D.IversonK. D.PetrosinoJ. F.SchlossS. J. (2014). The dynamics of a family’s gut microbiota reveal variations on a theme.Microbiome2:25. 10.1186/2049-2618-2-25
78
ShimJ. O. (2013). Gut microbiota in inflammatory bowel disease.Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Nutr.1617–21.
79
SokolH.LeducqV.AschardH.PhamH. P.JegouS.LandmanC.et al (2017). Fungal microbiota dysbiosis in IBD.Gut661039–1048. 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310746
80
SovranB.PlanchaisJ.JegouS.StraubeM.LamasB.NatividadJ. M.et al (2018). Enterobacteriaceae are essential for the modulation of colitis severity by fungi.Microbiome6:152. 10.1186/s40168-018-0538-9
81
StewartJ. A.ChadwickV. S.MurrayA. (2006). Carriage, quantification, and predominance of methanogens and sulfate-reducing bacteria in faecal samples.Lett. Appl. Microbiol.4358–63. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.01906.x
82
StroberW.FussI.MannonP.StroberW.FussI.MannonP. (2007). The fundamental basis of inflammatory bowel disease Find the latest version: science in medicine The fundamental basis of inflammatory bowel disease.J. Clin. Invest.117514–521. 10.1172/jci30587
83
SzajewskaH.KołodziejM. (2015). Systematic review with meta-analysis: Saccharomyces boulardii in the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea.Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther.42793–801.
84
TaboadaB.MoránP.Serrano-VázquezA.IscaronA. P.Rojas-VelázquezL.Pérez-JuárezH.et al (2021). The gut virome of healthy children during the first year of life is diverse and dynamic.PLoS One16:e0240958. 10.1371/journal.pone.0240958
85
TakataK.TomitaT.OkunoT.KinoshitaM.KodaT.HonoratJ. A.et al (2015). Dietary yeasts reduce inflammation in central nerve system via microflora.Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol.256–66.
86
TangJ.IlievI. D.BrownJ.UnderhillD. M.FunariV. A. (2015). Mycobiome: approaches to analysis of intestinal fungi.J. Immunol. Methods421112–121.
87
TaylorP. R.TsoniS. V.WillmentJ. A.DennehyK. M.RosasM.FindonH.et al (2007). Dectin-1 is required for β-glucan recognition and control of fungal infection.Nat. Immunol.831–38. 10.1038/ni1408
88
ThursbyE.JugeN. (2017). Introduction to the human gut microbiota.Biochem. J.4741823–1836.
89
UnderhillD. M.IlievI. D. (2014). The mycobiota: interactions between commensal fungi and the host immune system.Nat. Rev. Immunol.14405–416. 10.1038/nri3684
90
UngaroF.MassiminoL.FurfaroF.RimoldiV.Peyrin-BirouletL.D’AlessioS.et al (2019b). Metagenomic analysis of intestinal mucosa revealed a specific eukaryotic gut virome signature in early-diagnosed inflammatory bowel disease.Gut Microbes10149–158. 10.1080/19490976.2018.1511664
91
UngaroF.MassiminoL.D’AlessioS.DaneseS. (2019a). The gut virome in inflammatory bowel disease pathogenesis: from metagenomics to novel therapeutic approaches.United Eur. Gastroenterol. J.7999–1007.
92
ValentineD. L. (2007). Adaptations to energy stress dictate the ecology and evolution of the Archaea.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.5316–323. 10.1038/nrmicro1619
93
VautierS.MacCallumD. M.BrownG. D. (2012). C-type lectin receptors and cytokines in fungal immunity.Cytokine5889–99.
94
VemuriR.ShankarE. M.ChieppaM.EriR.KavanaghK. (2020). Beyond just bacteria: functional biomes in the gut ecosystem including virome, mycobiome, archaeome and helminths.Microorganisms8:483. 10.3390/microorganisms8040483
95
WalkerA. W.SandersonJ. D.ChurcherC.ParkesG. C.HudspithB. N.RaymentN.et al (2011). High-throughput clone library analysis of the mucosa-associated microbiota reveals dysbiosis and differences between inflamed and non-inflamed regions of the intestine in inflammatory bowel disease.BMC Microbiol.11:7. 10.1186/1471-2180-11-7
96
WhiteJ. F. (2017). Syntrophic imbalance and the etiology of bacterial endoparasitism diseases.Med. Hypotheses.10714–15. 10.1016/j.mehy.2017.07.015
97
WoeseC. R.KandlerO.WheelisM. L. (1990). Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains archaea, bacteria, and eucarya.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.874576–4579. 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576
98
YamasakiS.MatsumotoM.TakeuchiO.MatsuzawaT.IshikawaE.SakumaM.et al (2009). C-type lectin Mincle is an activating receptor for pathogenic fungus, Malassezia.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1061897–1902. 10.1073/pnas.0805177106
99
YatsunenkoT.ReyF. E.ManaryM. J.TrehanI.Dominguez-BelloM. G.ContrerasM.et al (2012). Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography.Nature486222–227. 10.1038/nature11053
100
YueB.LuoX.YuZ.ManiS.WangZ.DouW. (2019). Inflammatory bowel disease: a potential result from the collusion between gut microbiota and mucosal immune system.Microorganisms7:440. 10.3390/microorganisms7100440
101
ZhangM.SunK.WuY.YangY.TsoP.WuZ. (2017). Interactions between intestinal microbiota and host immune response in inflammatory bowel disease.Front. Immunol.8:942. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00942
102
ZhangY. J.LiS.GanR. Y.ZhouT.XuD. P.LiH. (2015). Impacts of gut bacteria on human health and diseases.Int. J. Mol. Sci.167493–7519.
Summary
Keywords
intestinal microbiota, archaeome, mycobiome, inflammation, inflammatory bowel disease, immunity
Citation
Houshyar Y, Massimino L, Lamparelli LA, Danese S and Ungaro F (2021) Going Beyond Bacteria: Uncovering the Role of Archaeome and Mycobiome in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Front. Physiol. 12:783295. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.783295
Received
25 September 2021
Accepted
09 November 2021
Published
06 December 2021
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited by
Phillipp Hartmann, University of California, San Diego, United States
Reviewed by
Roman Gardlik, Comenius University, Slovakia; Shu-Ling Wang, Second Military Medical University, China; Ioanna Aggeletopoulou, University of Patras, Greece
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Houshyar, Massimino, Lamparelli, Danese and Ungaro.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Federica Ungaro, ungaro.federica@hsr.it; federicaungaro@hotmail.com
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
‡These authors have contributed equally to this work and share senior authorship
This article was submitted to Gastrointestinal Sciences, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.