ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Sec. Exercise Physiology
Volume 13 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.757663
Combined Plyometric and Short Sprint Training in U-15 Male Soccer Players: Effects on Measures of Jump, Speed, Change of Direction, Repeated Sprint, and Balance
- 1Research Unit (UR17JS01), Sport Performance, Health & Society, Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Ksar Saîd, University of La Manouba, Tunis, Tunisia
- 2Physical Education Department, College of Education, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
- 3Sports Clinic Halle, Center of Joint Surgery, Halle, Germany
- 4Institute of Clinical Exercise and Health Science, School of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- 5Department of Sports Science, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
- 6Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Ksar Said, University of La Manouba, Tunis, Tunisia
- 7Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
This study examined the effect of 8 weeks of biweekly combined plyometric and short sprint training into the typical within-season training schedule of youth male soccer players. Participants were allocated at random to an experimental group (EG; n = 17, age: 14.6 ± 0.5 years, body mass: 60.5 ± 7.1 kg, height: 1.64 ± 0.08 m, body fat: 11.3 ± 1.4%) and a control group (CG; n = 17, age: 14.6 ± 0.4 years, body mass: 61.0 ± 3.9 kg, height: 1.67 ± 0.05 m, body fat: 11.8 ± 1.4%). Measures obtained pre- and post-intervention included vertical and horizontal jump performances (i.e., squat jump (SJ), countermovement jump with aimed arms (CMJA), and five-jump test (FJT)) and sprint performances (i.e., 10 and 30 m sprint). In addition, change-of-direction ability (sprint with 90° Turns (S90°) and sprint 9–3–6–3–9 m with backward and forward running (SBF)), repeated shuttle sprint ability (RSSA), and dynamic balance performance (Y balance test) were measured pre- and post-intervention. The EG experienced higher jump (all p < 0.05; d ≥ 0.71), sprint (all p < 0.05; d ≥ 0.64), change-of-direction ability (all p < 0.05; d ≥ 0.66), RSSA (all parameters except the fatigue index p < 0.01; d ≥ 0.71), and dynamic balance (all p ≤ 0.05; d ≥ 0.50) improvement compared to the CG. Adding biweekly combined plyometric and short sprint training to standard training improves the athletic performance of youth male soccer players (under 15 (U15)).
Competitive soccer match play is characterized by high-intensity intermittent activity patterns, whereby players are required to repeatedly sprint, turn, jump, and accelerate/decelerate which places the substantial neuromuscular load on players (Spencer et al., 2005; Stølen et al., 2005). Therefore, the ability of lower limb musculature to produce a high power output is an important fitness trait in soccer players (Wisløff et al., 2004). Speed and power are believed to be the variables predicting success in youth soccer (Reilly et al., 2000a). Specifically, sprint ability over short distances, agility performance, and vertical jumping are discriminative in terms of elite and sub-elite young soccer players (Reilly et al., 2000b). In professional soccer, various players commonly sprint over a distance between 200 and 1,100 m in a match (Rampinini et al., 2007; Andrzejewski et al., 2013). However, the average duration of sprints performed during a soccer match is typically short, ranging from 2 to 4 s (Stølen et al., 2005), with the sprint representing 1–11% of that distance (Mohr et al., 2003). Notably, 96% of sprints are less than 30 m, and 49% are less than 10 m (Stølen et al., 2005).
One specific type of power training that is easy to administer and therefore popular is plyometric jump training (PJT) (Ramirez-Campillo and Castillo, 2020; Ramirez-Campillo et al., 2021a; Sole and Ramírez-Campillo, 2021). PJT consists of exercises which take advantage of the stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) of the muscle (Komi and Gollhofer, 1999; Taube et al., 2012). Typically, plyometric jump exercises (PJT) can be performed with short (< 250 ms) or long ground contact times (> 250 ms), i.e., fast or slow SSC times (Duda, 1988; Sands et al., 2012; Faigenbaum and Chu, 2017). The utilization of the SSC enhances neural and musculotendinous ability to produce maximal force over a short duration (Wang and Zhang, 2016). Regardless of age, gender, sport, and expertise in training, plyometric training consistently results in improved vertical jumping, agility, and sprinting (Andrade et al., 2018; Ramirez-Campillo and Sanchez-Sanchez, 2020; Ramirez-Campillo et al., 2021b). In a systematic review, plyometric training increased power output in 13 of the 16 included studies, with effects ranging from 2 to 31% (Markovic and Mikulic, 2010). Furthermore, even in a short duration of less than 8 weeks, bilateral jumping coupled with unilateral drills enhanced performance (Markovic and Mikulic, 2010; Wang and Zhang, 2016).
Recently, combination training appears en vogue and is an efficacious tool for improving athletic performance. In this context, all of the combined sprint and plyometric (Ferley et al., 2020; Hammami et al., 2020; Kargarfard et al., 2020), agility and balance (Zemková and Hamar, 2010), plyometric and change-of-direction (Makhlouf et al., 2018; Hammami et al., 2019; Aloui et al., 2021), plyometric and sled (Prieto et al., 2021), balance and plyometric (Bouteraa et al., 2020; Guo et al., 2021), and plyometric and resistance (Almoslim, 2016; Ramirez-Campillo et al., 2018a; Fischetti et al., 2019) training programs have been effective to enhance muscle power. In addition, some recent research has indicated that combined training is superior to stand-alone approaches for increasing power and output capabilities (Chaouachi et al., 2014; Beato et al., 2018; Zghal et al., 2019; Ferley et al., 2020; Guo et al., 2021). Previous studies have recommended the continuation of combined plyometric and short sprint training into the soccer season to increase athletic performances. Hammami et al. (2020) found that such training enhanced jump performance, sprint performance, change-of-direction ability, and repeated change-of-direction ability, in youth male under 17 (U17) soccer players. Also, Sáez de Villarreal et al. (2015) reported significant increases in jump performance, sprint performance, and change-of-direction ability following combined plyometric-speed training and technical drills work, in youth male under 15 (U15) soccer players.
In fact, combined plyometric and short sprints seem to be the least scientifically investigated combination training mode than the others mentioned previously such as plyometrics and resistance, plyometrics and sled, and balance and plyometrics. To our knowledge, despite the above literature, there is a paucity of data concerning the efficacy of combined plyometric and short sprints on physical performance in youth male soccer players. Therefore, this study evaluated the effects of replacing normal training during the season with combined plyometric and short sprint training in elite male U15 soccer players. Herein, we examined vertical and horizontal jump performances (i.e., squat jump (SJ), countermovement jump with aimed arms (CMJA), five-jump test (FJT)), sprint performance (i.e., 10 and 30 m sprint), change-of-direction ability (sprint with 90° Turns (S90°) and sprint 9–3–6–3–9 m with backward and forward running (SBF)), repeated shuttle sprint ability (RSSA), and dynamic balance performance (Y balance test).
We hypothesized that replacing some of the regular in-season training with a biweekly intervention of this type would increase both horizontal and vertical jump performances, sprint performance, and the change-of-direction ability after 8 weeks.
Materials and Methods
Thirty-four participants of all positions from a single male soccer team in the National First Division, with a playing experience of 4.4 ± 0.8 years, were participated. Prior to participation, participants were deemed fit to participate in the study, without orthopedic or other conditions which would preclude them from undertaking the plyometric and change-of-direction training. Subjects were randomly allocated to an experimental group (EG; n = 17, age: 14.6 ± 0.5 years, body mass: 60.5 ± 7.1 kg, height: 1.64 ± 0.08 m, body fat: 11.3 ± 1.4%) and a control group (CG; n = 17, age: 14.6 ± 0.4 years, body mass: 61.0 ± 3.9 kg, height: 1.67 ± 0.05 m, body fat: 11.8 ± 1.4%). There was no baseline difference between the groups in anthropometric characteristics (p ≥ 0.05). Participants were without any problems regarding health status and physical condition as they had completed a 6-week preseason training period of 5-6 sessions each week.
Both groups undertook five training sessions per week (∼90 min each session), plus a competitive match one time per week. Conditioning training was completed two times per week, with the first session developing aerobic fitness through small-sided games while the second session targeted anaerobic fitness with resistance (40-60% 1 RM). The controls maintained their normal training schedule throughout the 2 months of the intervention, whereas the EG replaced the technical-tactical part of their standard regimen by combined plyometric and short sprint training. Participants also engaged in the 60-min school physical education sessions weekly (Table 1).
Table 1. Details of general training routine during the week performed by both control and experimental group over the 8-weeks intervention.
The University Institutional Review Committee for the ethical human experimentation approved the interventional study (pre- and post-design, CG vs. EG), which was in line with current national laws and regulations (reference number: KS000002020; date of approval: November 10, 2020). Participants (and their guardians, in the case of minors) gave written informed consent. Two familiarization sessions preceded the testing period by 2 weeks, which was 2 months into the competitive season.
Combined Plyometric and Short Sprint Training
The training group undertook four sessions or workshops, biweekly (Figure 1). Workshops commenced with plyometric exercises (i.e., hurdle jumps, lateral hurdle jumps, bouncy strides, and single-leg hop jumps) and ended with a short sprint of 10-15 m (Table 2). The total number of ground contacts per session was gradually increased throughout the intervention (from 72 to 144 ground contacts per session), as well as the number of sets (from 3 to 6 sets) for each workshop. The number of contacts per set was maintained at 6 contacts. A 90-s rest interval was planned between each set of exercises to allow sufficient recovery time (Negra et al., 2016). Jump training protocols were supervised by a qualified instructor. The training protocol was based on previously published recommendations for training volume and intensity from the study by Bedoya et al. (2015). Furthermore, the sprint training protocol was based on previously published recommendations for sprint distances (Sáez de Villarreal et al., 2015; Kargarfard et al., 2020).
Tests were conducted at least 3 days after the last competitive match and 5-9 days after the previous training session. Testing took place on a tartan surface integrated into the weekly training schedule of players and a standardized warm-up preceded each test. Tests were conducted on three separate days in the following order:
• Day 1: anthropometric assessment, SJ, CMJA, S90°;
• Day 2: Y balance test, 10 and 30 m sprint, SBF;
• Day 3: FJT and RSSA.
The 10 and 30 m sprint performance, S90°, SBF, SJ, CMJA, FJT, Y balance test, and the RSSA have all been previously described in detail (Sporis et al., 2010; Hammami et al., 2020; Negra et al., 2020) so are not repeated in this study to avoid self-plagiarism and for brevity. Anthropometric characteristics (body mass and body fat percentage) were evaluated barefoot in the morning after an overnight fast, with bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) (BC-602, Tanita Co., Tokyo, Japan; Sitko et al., 2020). Each test was explained and demonstrated by one of the trained assessors before the athlete started practice trials. The same assessor supervised the same test station during pre- and posttest to ensure consistency. A 90-s rest interval was planned between each set of exercises to allow sufficient recovery time (Negra et al., 2016).
All statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 28.0 for Windows (IBM, Armonk, NY, United States). Normal distribution was tested using the Shapiro–Wilk test. The results showed that the majority of parameters showed normal distribution (76%). However, 24% (9/37) of the other parameters are not normally distributed (body fat: p = 0.023, SJ 1: p = 0.017, SJ 2: p = 0.006, CMJA 1: p = 0.002, FJT 1: p = 0.001, FJT 2: p = 0.039, repeated sprint ability (RSA) fatigue index 1: p = 0.016, anterior direction of left leg 2: p = 0.010, and posteromedial direction of left leg 2: p = 0.034). Homogeneity of variance was determined using the Levene’s test. Notably, 38% (6/16) of variance tests indicated a missing of homogeneity of variance (SJ: p = 0.012, sprint 10 m: p = 0.038, RSA best time: p = 0.032, RSA mean time: p = 0.042, RSA fatigue index: p < 0.001, and posteromedial direction of left leg: p = 0.027).
A sample size calculation (nQuery Advisor 4.0; Statistical Solutions, Saugus, MA, USA) provided a sample size with n = 7 in each group. The calculation is based on a mean difference of 0.4 s in 10 m sprint using a two-sided t-test with the α level of 0.05 and a pooled SD of 0.3 s, with a statistical power of 0.8 (Bortz, 1999).
Independent samples t-tests examined baseline intergroup differences. Paired sample t-tests tested for pre-to-post performance changes within each group. Training effects were assessed by mixed factorial 2-way (group × time) ANOVA with repeated measures. Subsequently, Tukey’s post-hoc tests examined pairwise differences. Alpha levels are reported as exact p-values as suggested by the American Statistical Association (Hurlbert et al., 2019). Effect sizes are reported as Cohen’s d and are interpreted as trivial (< 0.20), small (≥ 0.20–0.49), moderate (≥ 0.50–0.79), and large (≥ 0.80) (Cohen, 1988). Percentage changes were calculated as ((post-training value − pre-training value)/pre-training value) × 100. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) (Vincent, 1995) and the coefficients of variation (CVs) over consecutive pairs of intra-participant trials (Schabort et al., 1998). Vertical and horizontal jump parameters, sprint parameters, change-of-direction ability, and balance performance had an ICC > 0.80 and a CV < 5% (Table 3). Data are reported as mean ± SD.
Table 3. Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC, 95% confidence intervals (CI)) and coefficient of variation (CV) for all performance tests.
Reliability is summarized in Table 3. ICC and CV, including 95% CI, show acceptable reliability for all variables. No parameter showed between-group differences at baseline.
Training Effects on Jump Performance
There were interaction effects (group × time) for vertical and horizontal jump performances, with the EG outperforming the CG in terms of improvement from pre- to post-intervention (SJ: Δ19%, p < 0.01, d = 0.71; CMJA: Δ20%, p < 0.05, d = 0.86; FJT: Δ15%, p < 0.05, d = 0.74; Table 4).
Table 4. Vertical and horizontal jump test, sprint times, and change of direction performance performances in experimental and control group before and after 8-weeks intervention.
Training Effects on Sprint Performance
There was a training effect (group × time) on sprint performance, with the EG improving more than CG (10 m sprint: Δ−11%, p < 0.01, d = 0.71; 30 m sprint: Δ−9%, p < 0.05, d = 0.64; Table 4).
Training Effects on Change-of-Direction Ability
There was a training effect for S90° and SBF with the EG improving more than CG (S90°: Δ−9%, p < 0.01, d = 0.76; SBF: Δ−8%, p < 0.05, d = 0.66; Table 4).
Training Effects on Repeated Shuttle Sprint Ability
For the ability to perform RSS, the RSSA test also showed group × time interactions for most of its parameters (RSSA best and RSSA mean), with time decreases of Δ−8% (p < 0.01, d = 0.72) and Δ−8% (p < 0.01, d = 0.71; Table 5).
Table 5. Repeated sprint shuttle ability test performances and Y-balance test performances in experimental and control group before and after 8-weeks intervention.
Training Effects on Balance Performance
There was a training effect on Y balance test performance with the EG improving more for balance measured on both legs (anterior: Δ11%, p = 0.05, d = 0.50; posteromedial: Δ10%, p < 0.05, d = 0.59; posterolateral: Δ16%, p < 0.05, d = 0.54 for right support leg). For the left support leg, we found similar results (anterior: Δ11%, p < 0.05, d = 0.53; posteromedial: Δ10%, p < 0.05, d = 0.66; posterolateral: Δ15%, p < 0.05, d = 0.54; Table 5).
This study tested the efficacy of an 8-week combined plyometric and short sprint training program at improving measures of athletic performance in elite adolescent soccer players. We observed that replacing some aspects of typical training with combined plyometric and short sprint training improved vertical and horizontal jump performances, sprinting, change-of-direction ability, the ability to RSS, and balance.
Effect of Training on Jump Performance
The ability to jump is a distinctive feature of success in adult and young soccer players (Söhnlein et al., 2014; Ramirez-Campillo et al., 2018b). Therefore, developing the ability of a soccer player to generate vertical power quickly is likely to be advantageous for the competition (Oliver et al., 2021). The results of this study suggest the intervention effects on vertical and horizontal jump performances (Table 4). Our findings are confirmed by Hammami et al. (2020) who observed improvements in vertical and horizontal jump performances following combined plyometric and short sprint training in male U17 soccer players. In addition, Sáez de Villarreal et al. (2015) reported significant increases in vertical jump performance following combined plyometric-speed training and technical drills work, in male youth soccer players (U15). Jump performance augmentation could be the result of neuromuscular adaptations such as greater neural drive of agonist muscles, changes in mechanical stiffness of tendons, size changes and/or the architecture of muscles, and changes in the mechanics of single fibers (Maffiuletti et al., 2002; de Villarreal et al., 2009; Thomas et al., 2009). Other potential mechanisms include (i) changes in muscle activation strategies (or intermuscular coordination) during vertical jumps, especially during the preparatory phase jump; and (ii) changes in the stretch reflex excitability (Bishop and Spencer, 2004; de Villarreal et al., 2009).
Effect of Training on Sprint Performance
Stølen et al. (2005) reported that 96% of sprint bouts during soccer match play are shorter than 30 m, with 49% being shorter than 10 m. The present results showed significant intervention effects in the EG compared to the CG for 10 and 30 m sprint performance. This corroborates findings reported by Sáez de Villarreal et al. (2015), who examined the efficacy of combined plyometric-speed training and technical drills work in youth male soccer players (U15) and noted improved sprint performance over 5 and 10 m. Moreover, Kargarfard et al. (2020) investigated the effects of combined plyometric and short sprint exercises in youth male under 19 (U19) soccer players. They reported improved sprint performance over 30 m. The improved sprint performance observed in this study may be useful for soccer players as it would correspond to an advantage in duels sprints, which can allow players to reach the ball before the opponent (Stølen et al., 2005).
Effect of Training on Change-of-Direction Ability
During soccer match play, players perform many accelerations and sprints at maximum speed (Haugen et al., 2014), with and without changes in direction (Bloomfield et al., 2007; Barnes et al., 2014). The present investigation demonstrated the intervention effects on the change-of-direction ability. There are few studies evaluating the effectiveness of combined plyometric and short sprint training program on change-of-direction ability, in soccer players (Sáez de Villarreal et al., 2015; Hammami et al., 2020; Kargarfard et al., 2020). This study corroborates the results obtained by Sáez de Villarreal et al. (2015), who studied the effects of combined plyometric-speed training and technical drills work in youth male soccer players (U15). They noted improvements in change-of-direction ability. Indeed, Kargarfard et al. (2020) observed significant increases in change-of-direction ability, following combined plyometric and short sprint training, in youth male soccer players (U19). Improvements in the change-of-direction ability necessitate rapid development of strength, eccentric force production in the lower limbs, and a rapid change from eccentric muscle to concentric contraction in the knee extensors. Plyometric training can enhance these factors (Miller et al., 2006; Sheppard and Young, 2006).
Effect of Training on Repeated Shuttle Sprint Ability
The present study demonstrated intervention effects on all RSSA parameters except the fatigue index. Our results are in line with those of Hammami et al. (2020) who reported improvement in all repeated change-of-direction ability parameters except the fatigue index in male U17 soccer players following combined plyometric and short sprint training. In contrast, our results contradict those reported by Kargarfard et al. (2020) who reported no improvements in RSA following combined plyometric and short sprint training in male U19 soccer players. Improvements in RSA may correspond to increased running efficiency (Balsalobre-Fernández et al., 2016) or increased tendon stiffness (Markovic and Mikulic, 2010), which allows a faster transfer of force from the contracting muscles, reducing reaction times, and improving change-of-direction ability (Markovic and Mikulic, 2010; Balsalobre-Fernández et al., 2016). Although maximum sprint speed is one of the performance composites of anaerobic performance in repeated sprints (Girard et al., 2011), other factors determining inter-sprint recovery and maintenance of performance are required to enhance RSA (da Silva et al., 2010; Girard et al., 2011).
Effect of Training on Balance Performance
Chimera et al. (2004) reported that incorporating plyometric exercises into athlete training reduces the risk of injury by improving the functional stability of the leg joints. Our study seems to be the first to examine the effects of the combined plyometric and short sprint training program on balance performance, in male U15 soccer players. Our results of improved balance disagree with those obtained by Hammami et al. (2020) who examined the efficacy of combined plyometric and short sprints, in male U17 soccer players and reported no improvements in static and dynamic balance performance. Differences in the combined plyometric and short sprint training program (duration, intensity, frequency, and type of exercise) and in methodology (age group and competitive level of the study population; duration of intervention) could contribute to these discrepancies. Improvements in balance reduced the risk of lower limb injury in soccer players (Lloyd, 2001). In the context of increased athletic performance (Zech et al., 2010), data from the present investigation emphasize the importance of plyometric training as an effective injury-reduction strategy in young athletes. A systematic review (Hübscher et al., 2010) showed evidence of the effectiveness of balance training in reducing the incidence of certain types of sports injuries among adolescent and young athletes during pivoting sports. Recently, Rivera et al. (2017) reported that balance training programs were effective in reducing the incidence rates of ankle sprains, including those with and those without a history of ankle sprains, in soccer players. In addition, the increased balance may be related to an improvement in lower extremity muscle co-contraction (Lloyd, 2001) or the changes in proprioception and neuromuscular control (Michailidis et al., 2019).
Notably, the 8-week, biweekly, in-season, combined plyometric and short sprint training improves strength and balance performance in elite youth soccer players (U15). Therefore, male youth soccer players may benefit from combined plyometric and short sprint training during the competitive season and yield positive results in the performance measures. Practically speaking, the total training time was only 15–30 min per session, which can be incorporated into a habitual soccer training two times per week.
Limitations of this study are the relatively small sample size, although this is consistent with a squad size of this age and ability, and those results are applicable to one particular category of youth soccer players and cannot be extrapolated to other sexes or age groups. In future studies, plyometric or sprint training should be examined separately and in combination to study the effect of these programs on different athletic performances in young soccer players. It is important to determine what exactly (i.e., plyometrics, sprinting, or combination) improves performance. However, this would necessitate considerably greater resource commitment. Further research is needed in other age groups, female soccer players, and other skill levels to verify the effectiveness of combined plyometric and short sprint training.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Review Board of Research Unit (UR17JS01) Sport Performance, Health & Society, Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education, Ksar-Saîd, University. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardian/next of kin.
GA and MC contributed to conceptualization. GA contributed to methodology, software, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, and project administration. GA, MC, and TB contributed to validation. MC contributed to resources and supervision. SH and LH contributed to writing—review and editing. EB contributed to visualization. RS contributed to funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
The authors thank MC [Research Unit (UR17JS01) Sport Performance, Health & Society, Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Ksar-Saîd, University of La Manouba, Tunis, Tunisia] for the valuable experimental help.
Almoslim, H. (2016). Effect of combined plyometric-sprint and combined plyometric-resistance training protocols on speed, explosive power and change of direction. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 9, 1–8. doi: 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i32/90040
Aloui, G., Hermassi, S., Khemiri, A., Bartels, T., Hayes, L. D., Bouhafs, E. G., et al. (2021). An 8-week program of plyometrics and sprints with changes of direction improved anaerobic fitness in young male soccer players. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18:10446. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910446
Andrade, D. C., Beltrán, A. R., Labarca-Valenzuela, C., Manzo-Botarelli, O., Trujillo, E., Otero-Farias, P., et al. (2018). Effects of plyometric training on explosive and endurance performance at sea level and at high altitude. Front. Physiol. 9:1415. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01415
Andrzejewski, M., Chmura, J., Pluta, B., Strzelczyk, R., and Kasprzak, A. (2013). Analysis of sprinting activities of professional soccer players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 27, 2134–2140. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318279423e
Balsalobre-Fernández, C., Santos-Concejero, J., and Grivas, G. V. (2016). Effects of strength training on running economy in highly trained runners: a systematic review with meta-analysis of controlled trials. J. Strength Cond. Res. 30, 2361–2368. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000001316
Barnes, C., Archer, D. T., Hogg, B., Bush, M., and Bradley, P. S. (2014). The evolution of physical and technical performance parameters in the english premier league. Int. J. Sports Med. 35, 1095–1100. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1375695
Beato, M., Bianchi, M., Coratella, G., Merlini, M., and Drust, B. (2018). Effects of plyometric and directional training on speed and jump performance in elite youth soccer players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 32, 289–296. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000002371
Bedoya, A., Miltenberger, M., and Lopez, R. (2015). Plyometric training effects on athletic performance in youth soccer athletes: a systematic review. J. Strength Cond. Res. 29, 2351–2360. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000877
Bishop, D., and Spencer, M. (2004). Determinants of repeated-sprint ability in well-trained team-sport athletes and endurance-trained athletes. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fitness 44, 1–7.
Bloomfield, J., Polman, R., and O’Donoghue, P. (2007). Physical demands of different positions in fa premier league soccer. J. Sports Sci. Med. 6, 63–70.
Bouteraa, I., Negra, Y., Shephard, R., and Chelly, M. (2020). Effects of combined balance and plyometric training on athletic performance in female basketball players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 34, 1967–1973. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002546
Chaouachi, A., Othman, A. B., Hammami, R., Drinkwater, E. J., and Behm, D. G. (2014). The combination of plyometric and balance training improves sprint and shuttle run performances more often than plyometric-only training with children. J. Strength Cond. Res. 28, 401–412. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182987059
Chimera, N. J., Swanik, K. A., Swanik, C. B., and Straub, S. J. (2004). Effects of plyometric training on muscle-activation strategies and performance in female athletes. J. Athl. Train. 39, 24–31.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences, 2nd Edn. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
da Silva, J. F., Guglielmo, L. G., and Bishop, D. (2010). Relationship between different measures of aerobic fitness and repeated-sprint ability in elite soccer players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 24, 2115–2121. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e34794
de Villarreal, E. S., Kellis, E., Kraemer, W. J., and Izquierdo, M. (2009). Determining variables of plyometric training for improving vertical jump height performance: a meta-analysis. J. Strength Cond. Res. 23, 495–506. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318196b7c6
Duda, M. (1988). Plyometrics: a legitimate form of power training? Phys. Sportsmed. 16, 212–218. doi: 10.1080/00913847.1988.11709466
Faigenbaum, A., and Chu, D. (2017). Plyometric Training for Children and Adolescents. Indianapolis, IN: American College of Sports Medicine.
Ferley, D. D., Scholten, S., and Vukovich, M. D. (2020). Combined sprint interval, plyometric, and strength training in adolescent soccer players: effects on measures of speed, strength, power, change of direction, and anaerobic capacity. J. Strength Cond. Res. 34, 957–968. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000003476
Fischetti, F., Cataldi, S., and Greco, G. (2019). A combined plyometric and resistance training program improves fitness performance in 12 to 14−years−old boys. Sport Sci. Health 15, 615–621.
Girard, O., Mendez-Villanueva, A., and Bishop, D. (2011). Repeated-sprint ability—part i: factors contributing to fatigue. Sports Med. 41, 673–694. doi: 10.2165/11590550-000000000-00000
Guo, Z., Huang, Y., Zhou, Z., Leng, B., Gong, W., Cui, Y., et al. (2021). The effect of 6-week combined balance and plyometric training on change of direction performance of elite badminton players. Front. Psychol. 12:684964.
Hammami, M., Gaamouri, N., Aloui, G., Shephard, R. J., and Chelly, M. S. (2019). Effects of combined plyometric and short sprint with change-of-direction training on athletic performance of male u15 handball players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 33, 662–675. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000002870
Hammami, M., Gaamouri, N., and Suzuki, K. (2020). Effects of unloaded vs. ankle-loaded plyometric training on the physical fitness of u-17 male soccer players. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17:7877. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217877
Haugen, T., Tønnessen, E., Hisdal, J., and Seiler, S. (2014). The role and development of sprinting speed in soccer. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 9, 432–441. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2013-0121
Hübscher, M., Zech, A., Pfeifer, K., Hänsel, F., Vogt, L., and Banzer, W. (2010). Neuromuscular training for sports injury prevention: a systematic review. Med. Sci. Sports Exe. 42, 413–421. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181b88d37
Hurlbert, S., Levine, R., and Utts, J. (2019). Coup de grâce for a tough old bull: “statistically significant” expires. Am. Stat. 73, 352–357. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2018.1543616
Kargarfard, M., Rabbani, T. S. A., Clemente, F., and Jalilvand, F. (2020). Effects of combined plyometric and speed training on change of direction, linear speed, and repeated sprint ability in young soccer players: a pilot study. Kinesiology 52, 85–93. doi: 10.26582/k.52.1.11
Komi, P., and Gollhofer, A. (1999). Stretch reflex can have an important role in force enhancement during ssc-exercise. J. Appl. Biomech. 13, 451–459.
Lloyd, D. G. (2001). Rationale for training programs to reduce anterior cruciate ligament injuries in australian football. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 31, 645–654; discussion 661. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2001.31.11.645
Maffiuletti, N. A., Dugnani, S., Folz, M., Di Pierno, E., and Mauro, F. (2002). Effect of combined electrostimulation and plyometric training on vertical jump height. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 34, 1638–1644. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200210000-00016
Makhlouf, I., Chaouachi, A., Chaouachi, M., Ben Othman, A., Granacher, U., and Behm, D. G. (2018). Combination of agility and plyometric training provides similar training benefits as combined balance and plyometric training in young soccer players. Front. Physiol. 9:1611. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01611
Markovic, G., and Mikulic, P. (2010). Neuro-musculoskeletal and performance adaptations to lower-extremity plyometric training. Sports Med. 40, 859–895. doi: 10.2165/11318370-000000000-00000
Michailidis, Y., Tabouris, A., and Metaxas, T. (2019). Effects of plyometric and directional training on physical fitness parameters in youth soccer players. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 14, 392–398. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0545
Miller, M. G., Herniman, J. J., Ricard, M. D., Cheatham, C. C., and Michael, T. J. (2006). The effects of a 6-week plyometric training program on agility. J. Sports Sci. Med. 5, 459–465.
Mohr, M., Krustrup, P., and Bangsbo, J. (2003). Match performance of high-standard soccer players with special reference to development of fatigue. J. Sports Sci. 21, 519–528. doi: 10.1080/0264041031000071182
Negra, Y., Chaabene, H., Fernandez-Fernandez, J., Sammoud, S., Bouguezzi, R., Prieske, O., et al. (2020). Short-term plyometric jump training improves repeated-sprint ability in prepuberal male soccer players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 34, 3241–3249. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002703
Negra, Y., Chaabene, H., Hammami, M., Hachana, Y., and Granacher, U. (2016). Effects of high-velocity resistance training on athletic performance in prepuberal male soccer athletes. J. Strength Cond. Res. 30, 3290–3297. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001433
Oliver, J. L., Barillas, S. R., Lloyd, R. S., Moore, I., and Pedley, J. (2021). External cueing influences drop jump performance in trained young soccer players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 35, 1700–1706. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000002935
Prieto, M. F., González, J. R., Sáez de Villarreal Sáez, E., Palma, J. R., Iglesias García, F. J., and González Fernández, F. T. (2021). Effects of combined plyometric and sled training on vertical jump and linear speed performance in young soccer players. Retos 42, 228–235.
Ramirez-Campillo, R., Alvarez, C., García-Pinillos, F., Sanchez-Sanchez, J., Yanci, J., Castillo, D., et al. (2018a). Optimal reactive strength index: is it an accurate variable to optimize plyometric training effects on measures of physical fitness in young soccer players? J. Strength Cond. Res. 32, 885–893. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000002467
Ramirez-Campillo, R., Sanchez-Sanchez, J., Gonzalo-Skok, O., Rodríguez-Fernandez, A., Carretero, M., and Nakamura, F. Y. (2018b). Specific changes in young soccer player’s fitness after traditional bilateral vs. unilateral combined strength and plyometric training. Front. Physiol. 9:265. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00265
Ramirez-Campillo, R., Andrade, D. C., and García-Pinillos, F. (2021a). Effects of jump training on physical fitness and athletic performance in endurance runners: a meta-analysis. J. Sports Sci. 39, 1–21.
Ramirez-Campillo, R., and Castillo, D. (2020). Effects of plyometric jump training on jump and sprint performance in young male soccer players: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 50, 2125–2143.
Ramirez-Campillo, R., García-de-Alcaraz, A., Chaabene, H., Moran, J., Negra, Y., and Granacher, U. (2021b). Effects of plyometric jump training on physical fitness in amateur and professional volleyball: a meta-analysis. Front. Physiol. 12:636140. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.636140
Ramirez-Campillo, R., and Sanchez-Sanchez, J. (2020). Effects of plyometric jump training in female soccer player’s vertical jump height: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J. Sports Sci. 38, 1475–1487. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1745503
Rampinini, E., Coutts, A. J., Castagna, C., Sassi, R., and Impellizzeri, F. M. (2007). Variation in top level soccer match performance. Int. J. Sports Med. 28, 1018–1024. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-965158
Reilly, T., Bangsbo, J., and Franks, A. (2000a). Anthropometric and physiological predispositions for elite soccer. J. Sports Sci. 18, 669–683. doi: 10.1080/02640410050120050
Reilly, T., Williams, A. M., Nevill, A., and Franks, A. (2000b). A multidisciplinary approach to talent identification in soccer. J. Sports Sci. 18, 695–702. doi: 10.1080/02640410050120078
Rivera, M. J., Winkelmann, Z. K., Powden, C. J., and Games, K. E. (2017). Proprioceptive training for the prevention of ankle sprains: an evidence-based review. J. Athl. Train 52, 1065–1067. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-52.11.16
Sáez de Villarreal, E., Suarez-Arrones, L., Requena, B., Haff, G. G., and Ferrete, C. (2015). Effects of plyometric and sprint training on physical and technical skill performance in adolescent soccer players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 29, 1894–1903.
Sands, W., Wurth, J., and Hewit, J. (eds) (2012). “Speed and agility training,” in Basics of Strength and Conditioning Manual. TNSaCAs (NSCA), (National Strength and Conditioning Association: Springs), 59–92.
Schabort, E. J., Hopkins, W. G., and Hawley, J. A. (1998). Reproducibility of self-paced treadmill performance of trained endurance runners. Int. J. Sports Med. 19, 48–51. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-971879
Sheppard, J. M., and Young, W. B. (2006). Agility literature review: classifications, training and testing. J. Sports Sci. 24, 919–932. doi: 10.1080/02640410500457109
Sitko, S., Cirer-Sastre, R., Corbi, F., and López Laval, I. (2020). Effects of a low-carbohydrate diet on body composition and performance in road cycling: a randomized, controlled trial. Nutr. Hosp. 37, 1022–1027.
Söhnlein, Q., Müller, E., and Stöggl, T. L. (2014). The effect of 16-week plyometric training on explosive actions in early to mid-puberty elite soccer players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 28, 2105–2114. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000000387
Sole, S., and Ramírez-Campillo, R. (2021). Plyometric jump training effects on the physical fitness of individual-sport athletes: a systematic review with meta-analysis. PeerJ. 9, e11004. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11004
Spencer, M., Bishop, D., Dawson, B., and Goodman, C. (2005). Physiological and metabolic responses of repeated-sprint activities:specific to field-based team sports. Sports Med. 35, 1025–1044. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200535120-00003
Sporis, G., Jukic, I., Milanovic, L., and Vucetic, V. (2010). Reliability and factorial validity of agility tests for soccer players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 24, 679–686. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c4d324
Stølen, T., Chamari, K., Castagna, C., and Wisløff, U. (2005). Physiology of soccer: an update. Sports Med. 35, 501–536. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200535060-00004
Taube, W., Leukel, C., and Gollhofer, A. (2012). How neurons make us jump: the neural control of stretch-shortening cycle movements. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 40, 106–115. doi: 10.1097/JES.0b013e31824138da
Thomas, K., French, D., and Hayes, P. R. (2009). The effect of two plyometric training techniques on muscular power and agility in youth soccer players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 23, 332–335. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318183a01a
Vincent, W. (1995). Statistics in Kinesiology. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Wang, Y. C., and Zhang, N. (2016). Effects of plyometric training on soccer players. Exp. Ther. Med. 12, 550–554. doi: 10.3892/etm.2016.3419
Wisløff, U., Castagna, C., Helgerud, J., Jones, R., and Hoff, J. (2004). Strong correlation of maximal squat strength with sprint performance and vertical jump height in elite soccer players. Br. J. Sports Med. 38, 285–288. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2002.002071
Zech, A., Hübscher, M., Vogt, L., Banzer, W., Hänsel, F., and Pfeifer, K. (2010). Balance training for neuromuscular control and performance enhancement: a systematic review. J. Athl. Train. 45, 392–403. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-45.4.392
Zemková, E., and Hamar, D. (2010). The effect of 6-week combined agility-balance training on neuromuscular performance in basketball players. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fitness 50, 262–267.
Zghal, F., Colson, S. S., Blain, G., Behm, D. G., Granacher, U., and Chaouachi, A. (2019). Combined resistance and plyometric training is more effective than plyometric training alone for improving physical fitness of pubertal soccer players. Front. Physiol. 10:1026. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01026
Keywords: stretch-shortening cycle, short sprints training, plyometric training, training youth, soccer
Citation: Aloui G, Hermassi S, Bartels T, Hayes LD, Bouhafs EG, Chelly MS and Schwesig R (2022) Combined Plyometric and Short Sprint Training in U-15 Male Soccer Players: Effects on Measures of Jump, Speed, Change of Direction, Repeated Sprint, and Balance. Front. Physiol. 13:757663. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.757663
Received: 12 August 2021; Accepted: 17 January 2022;
Published: 18 February 2022.
Edited by:Jason Moran, University of Essex, United Kingdom
Reviewed by:Rihab Borji, University of Sfax, Tunisia
Mark Williams, University of Essex, United Kingdom
Copyright © 2022 Aloui, Hermassi, Bartels, Hayes, Bouhafs, Chelly and Schwesig. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Souhail Hermassi, firstname.lastname@example.org
†These authors share last authorship