Impact Factor 4.566 | CiteScore 5.6
More on impact ›


Front. Physiol., 09 May 2022 |

Performance-Related Physiological and Haematological Changes During Pregnancy and Postpartum in a Well-Trained Cyclist Performing Endurance Training

  • 1Section for Health and Exercise Physiology, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Lillehammer, Norway
  • 2Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, The August Krogh Section for Molecular Physiology, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • 3Centre for Elite Sports Research, Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
  • 4Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Sport Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
  • 5Department of Sports Sciences and Physical Education, Nord University, Bodø, Norway

Purpose: To describe the performance-related physiological and haematological changes in a well-trained cyclist (peak oxygen uptake, VO2peak: 54.9 ml min−1·kg−1) performing endurance training during pregnancy and postpartum.

Methods: Training data was systemized by training form (endurance and resistance), intensity (low- (LIT), moderate-, and high-intensity training), and modality (cycling, running, hiking, XC-skiing, strength training and other). Power output at 4 mmol L−1 [BLa] (L4), maximal aerobic power (Wmax), and VO2peak as well as haemoglobin mass, blood volume, plasma volume and red blood cell volume (RBCV) were measured at different time points during pregnancy and 12 weeks postpartum.

Results: L4 and Wmax increased by 3% while absolute VO2peak was unaltered from gestational wk 2 to 14, despite 12 and 14% increases in RBCV and BV. After delivery, BV was reduced by 7% but RBCV was maintained 5% above start-pregnancy levels, while VO2peak almost returned to (-1%), and Wmax increased by 5% above start-pregnancy levels 12 weeks postpartum.

Conclusion: This case-study illustrates a disassociation between increases in haematological values and VO2peak during pregnancy. Furthermore, a quick resumption of LIT and a gradually increasing intensity of training in the 12 weeks following delivery ensured a return to start-pregnancy levels of VO2peak and corresponding improvements in Wmax. Although general recommendations cannot be given on the basis of these data, this study provides a framework for investigating pregnant endurance athletes and contributes to the generation of new hypotheses in this field.


Many female endurance athletes train relatively large volumes of endurance training during pregnancy, aiming to maintain physical fitness and rapidly regain their performance-level after delivery. Previous studies indicate that well-trained women can benefit from low- (LIT) to moderate-intensity (MIT) endurance training during an uncomplicated pregnancy, thereby facilitating a rapid return to competitive sport (Kardel, 2005). However, the employment of high-intensity training (HIT) during pregnancy is more controversial (Salvesen et al., 2012), and the effects of systematic endurance training and pregnancy-induced hematological alterations on endurance performance have not been described coherently during and after pregnancy in well-trained athletes.

The pregnant athlete undergoes similar physiological changes as other pregnant women, including major cardiovascular changes from the fifth week of gestation (Duvekot et al., 1993; Morris et al., 2015). To ensure sufficient blood supply to the growing foetus, these changes include reduced vascular resistance, increased ventilation, heart rate (HR) and cardiac output as well as a progressive rise in maternal blood volume (Pivarnik et al., 1994; Ekholm and Erkkola, 1996; Gilson et al., 1997). After giving birth, these cardiovascular and haematological changes seem to gradually return to normal within 6–12 weeks (Clapp and Capeless, 1997). However, it is currently unknown how these cardiovascular changes together with high volumes of endurance training influence performance-related physiological variables during pregnancy and postpartum.

One of the major challenges of doing research on pregnant athletes is recruiting a suffient number of participants. Case studies are therefore valuable tools to gather information about physiological changes and the possible effects of training occurring during pregnancy and postpartum. A recent study reported that the world’s most successful cross-country skier was able to maintain a high training volume during most of her pregnancy, with a gradual reduction of training volume during the third trimester (Solli and Sandbakk, 2018). Her oxygen uptake (VO2) at the estimated lactate threshold decreased to 95% of absolute pre-pregnancy values in the first trimester and further to 93% in the second trimester. After delivery, a relatively rapid return to pre-pregnancy levels was observed, with the VO2 at the lactate threshold being back at pre-pregnancy levels in week 6–12 and above (103%) in week 13–21 postpartum. However, no data on the accompanied development of haematological variables were measured. To better understand the underlying mechanisms of the physiological changes during pregnancy and postpartum in well-trained women, data including training characteristics, performance-related and haematological variables are needed.

During a previous training intervention (Almquist et al., 2022), in which the effects of periodized endurance training (cycling; 74%, XC-skiing/running; 24%, resistance training 2% of the sessions) were investigated, one of the female participants became pregnant during the intervention period. This participant wanted to complete the training intervention (see ethical considerations discussed below), which provided a unique data set on the haematological and physiological changes occurring during pregnancy and postpartum in a well-trained female cyclist in relation to maintained endurance exercise training. Therefore, this study used a single case approach to describe the haematological and physiological changes in a well-trained cyclist performing semi-structured endurance training during pregnancy and postpartum.

Materials and Methods


The participant was a two-child mother, 37.3 years of age, 177 cm body height and 65.7 kg body mass, and a well-trained cyclist, according to the classification by (Decroix et al., 2016). As recorded 5 weeks prior to the start of the intervention, she exercised regularly (4 ± 1 sessions·week−1) including endurance and resistance training (4.2–6.9 h week−1 in late December) and competed in amateur-level cycling competitions. During her pregnancy, she also consumed iron supplementation according to general guidelines for pregnant women.

Ethical Considerations

Prior to the training intervention, the participant had received written and oral information about potential risks and discomforts associated with the training and testing and had given her written consent to participate. When the participant found out that she was pregnant, she was made aware of the potential risk factors when exercising during pregnancy and again informed that she could withdraw from the study. Since the participant still wanted to complete the training intervention, she was allowed by the research team to continue, but was instructed to avoid pushing herself more than what she felt comfortable with. The participant was in her third pregnancy and did not experience any discomfort or other problems during or after the pregnancy. She had a natural birth without complications and bore a healthy child of 49 cm and 3,238 g. Based on this, the publication of this case study was evaluated to be ethically sound by the Regional Ethics Committee (Ref. 231,427) since the collected data can contribute with new knowledge about changes in well-trained women’s physiology in response to endurance training during pregnancy and postpartum.

Exercise Training

All training was recorded from the start of pregnancy and during the following 52 weeks. The start of the block-periodized training intervention took place in the third week of the participant’s first trimester (Figure 1). As part of the training intervention, she completed 12 weeks of structured cycling training as previously described (Almquist et al., 2022). The structured training consisted of; four moderate-intensity interval training sessions (4 × 12 min) in week 1, three to six low-intensity training sessions (>60 min continuous cycling) in week 2, and four high-intensity interval training sessions (5 × 5 min) in week 3. The fourth week of each meso cycle was prescribed as a recovery week. This 4-week mesocycle was repeated three times, including a total of 12 weeks of structured block-periodized training. All sessions were carried out using an effort-based approach and the participant was instructed to perform all sessions at the highest possible average power output that she felt comfortable with. Hence, the majority of the HIT-time during the training intervention was spent in the lower part of HIT-zone (8.3 h at 87–92%HRpeak) compared to the higher part (6.0 h > 93%HRpeak). Then, until giving birth, the participant adjusted her training (intensity and volume) according to her own preferences. After delivery, the participant quickly took up her habitual training routines on her own initiative, and gradually increased training volume and intensity in the following weeks. The first HIT-sessions were re-introduced in the third week postpartum.


FIGURE 1. (A) Schematic overview of experimental testing and exercise training distribution in three intensities (LIT, low-intensity; MIT, moderate-intensity; HIT, high-intensity training) as described previously (Seiler, 2010), and (B) exercise modalities before-, during pregnancy, and 12 weeks postpartum.


Training Data

Training data were recorded daily by the participant in a digital diary (, Colorado, United States), including information about intensity and exercise modality (cycling, running/hiking, XC-skiing, strength training and other). The endurance training was registered in three intensity zones based on actual HR registration as previously described (Seiler, 2010); LIT (<82%HRpeak), MIT (82–87%HRpeak), and HIT (>87%HRpeak), as well as comments regarding session details. A total of 134 LIT-sessions, 30 MIT-sessions, 43 HIT-sessions, and 52 resistance training sessions were performed during a year representing 52/11/17/20% of total sessions, respectively, averaging 4.6 ± 2.0 sessions per week. Average training volume was maintained at 6.7 ± 2.9 and 7.9 ± 4.8 h week−1 during the first and second trimesters, respectively. The number of LIT, MIT, HIT, and resistance exercise sessions represented 48/25/20/8% during the first trimester and 56/8/15/20% during the second trimester, respectively. During the third trimester, the training volume decreased to 3.8 ± 2.0 h week−1 (Figure 1) and included primarily LIT and resistance training (67/7/2/24%). After delivery, the training volume increased from 4.6 ± 2.5 h week−1 during the first 6 weeks postpartum to 5.6 ± 1.4 h week−1 during week 6–12, while the intensity of exercise gradually increased. Likewise, the distribution of sessions performed as LIT/MIT/HIT/resistance training changed from 61/12/17/46% in the first 6 weeks to 50/5/37/45% in week 6–12, respectively.

Physiological Measurements

The physiological measurements were performed during gestational weeks 2, 6, 10, 14 and 33, in addition to weeks 2, 6 and 12 weeks postpartum (Figure 1). This included measurements of power output at 4 mmol L−1 [BLa] (L4), maximal aerobic power (Wmax) and peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak). The percentage typical error (%TE) for L4, Wmax, and VO2peak are 1.9%, 1.0%, and 3.1% (unpublished data from our lab). Therefore, alterations larger than the %TE are described as changes in the results section. All protocols and equipment used are described in detail here (Almquist et al., 2020). Cycling tests were performed on an electromagnetically braked cycle ergometer (Lode Excalibur Sport, Lode B. V. Groningen, Netherlands) and VO2 was measured using a computerized metabolic system with a mixing chamber (Oxycon Pro, Erich Jaeger, Hoechberg, Germany). The participant was instructed to perform until volitional exhaustion and to avoid performing beyond her perceived tolerance during the VO2peak ramp test and reached [BLa] ≥8.9 mmol L−1, RER ≥1.12, and an RPE of 20. VO2peak was calculated as the highest average of a 1-min moving average. Peak heart rate (HRpeak) was registered as the highest achieved HR during the measurement of VO2peak. Wmax was calculated as the mean power output during the last minute of the incremental test. Haemotological measurements were performed in gestational weeks 2, 6, 10 and 14 in addition to weeks 1, 6 and 12 postpartum. This included measurements of haemoglobin mass (Hb-mass), blood volume (BV), plasma volume (PV) and red blood cell volume (RBCV) on an OpCO (Detalo Performance, Detalo Health, Birkerød, Denmark) using a modified version of the carbon monoxide (CO) rebreathing technique (Siebenmann et al., 2012), as previously described (Almquist et al., 2021). The %TE for HB-mass measurements is ∼2% as previously reported from our lab (Ronnestad et al., 2021). These measurements were performed on four occasions during the participant’s first trimester (weeks 2, 6, 10, and 14 according to the training intervention) and at weeks 6 and 12 postpartum. In the general population living in metropolitan cities, CO bound to hemoglobin (COHb%) is ∼2% for non-smokers and 10–15% for smokers (Gozubuyuk et al., 2017). Pregnant women are considered CO-poisoned at COHb% >15% (Gozubuyuk et al., 2017). Therefore, in the present case study, low volumes of CO (1 ml kg−1 body weight) were applied and the maximum COHb% was 8.4%, which was in the third week of pregnancy. The mean HbCO% for all measurements performed on the participant was 7.2 ± 0.5.


Body Mass

Body mass increased gradually during pregnancy, peaking at 85.0 kg during gestational week 40, which was 19.3 kg above the start-pregnancy level (week 2). After delivery, body mass was quickly reduced, being 3.6 kg above start-pregnancy level 12 weeks postpartum. Consequently, performance-related measures expressed relative to body mass were generally reduced during pregnancy but returned towards start-pregnancy level 12 weeks postpartum.

Changes During Pregnancy

An overview of the physiological and haemotological measurements from the beginning of pregnancy (week 2) to 12 weeks postpartum is presented in Table 1.


TABLE 1. Haematological-, and performance-related measures from the beginning of pregnancy (week 2) to 12 weeks (wk+12) postpartum.

Wmax was unchanged in week 6, before it increased by 3% (+9 W) in week 14 following 12 weeks of structured endurance training. In contrast, L4 increased by 6% (+10 W) in week 6, and was 3% (+6 W) above start pregnancy levels in week 14 following the structured endurance training period. L4 was maintained at start-pregnancy level (-2W) in week 33 after a period of mainly LIT. Absolute VO2peak was reduced by 4% (-153 ml min−1) in gestational wk 6, before returning to 1% (+31 ml) above start-pregnancy values in week 14. Haematological variables, including RBCV and Hb-mass increased by 5% (+95 ml) and 7% (+40 g) in week 6 and further increased to 14% (+226 ml) and 17% (+101 g) above start pregnancy levels in week 14, respectively.

Changes During Postpartum

Wmax returned to start-pregnancy levels in week 6 and further increased by 5% (+16 W) above the start-pregnancy value in wk 12. Two weeks postpartum, L4 was reduced by 17% (-31 W) compared to start-pregnancy level, before quickly increasing to values being only 2–3% (4–5 W) below start-pregnancy level in week 6 and 12 postpartum. Absolute VO2peak was reduced by 7% (-254 ml) compared to the start-pregnancy level and returned to 1% (−40 ml) below the start-pregnancy level in week 12 postpartum.

The highest measurements of RBCV and Hb-mass occurred 1 week postpartum with values being 24% (+438 ml) and 27% (+160 g) above start-pregnancy levels, respectively, remaining ∼4–6% (81–89 ml and 25–37 g, respectively) above start-pregnancy levels in wk 6 and 12 weeks postpartum. However, substantial decreases in PV were observed 1, 6, and 12 weeks postpartum (−241 ml, −597 ml, and −402 ml, respectively), coinciding vastly increasing haematocrit (+7.4, +6.9, and +4.9 %-points, respectively) compared to start-pregnancy.


This case-study describes performance-related physiological and haematological changes during pregnancy and postpartum for a well-trained cyclist performing endurance training. From gestational week 2 to 14, Wmax and L4 were improved by 3% while the absolute VO2peak was unaltered, despite substantial increases in both RBCV (12%) and BV (14%). Twelve weeks postpartum, Wmax was 5% above-, while VO2peak was almost back at start-pregnancy levels (−1%). In addition, blood volume was reduced by 7%, while RBCV was maintained 5% above start-pregnancy values.

While HIT is generally regarded as an effective cardiovascular stimulus (Laursen and Jenkins, 2002; Buchheit and Laursen, 2013), the unchanged absolute values of VO2peak, despite substantial amounts of HIT and vastly increased RBCV and BV during the initial phase of pregnancy, could indicate that HIT does not provide additional benefits above the otherwise recommended MIT during pregnancy (Mottola et al., 2018). The present findings are in line with a previous study where the authors investigated pregnant athletes, reporting no increase in VO2peak during pregnancy but substantially improved VO2peak postpartum (Kardel, 2005). Hence, it could be speculated that the lack of VO2peak improvement, despite increased RBCV, BV, and Hb-mass, is due to a protective mechanism for the growing foetus, since a clear relation between Hb-mass and VO2peak is evident in non-pregnant athletes (Lundby and Robach, 2015). However, the mechanisms underlying this dissociation between changes in haematological measures and VO2peak need further investigation. Although adverse effects of HIT on fetal well-being are not consistently reported (Szymanski and Satin, 2012; Anderson et al., 2021), the recommendation of MIT rather than HIT during pregnancy would reduce any risk of fetal bradycardia previously observed with maternal exercise intensities above 90% HRpeak (Salvesen et al., 2012). The observed haematological alterations are in line with previous reviews in pregnant athletes (Bo et al., 2016). However, haemodilution as normally occurs during pregnancy (Pivarnik et al., 1994), was only observed in week 10 in our participant. The haematocrit, otherwise, remained ∼39–41%, whether this relates to hydration, exercise, or error of measurements is speculative.

Interestingly, RBCV and Hb-mass remained 5–6% higher than start-pregnancy values during wk 6 to 12 postpartum, while haematocrit was 7 and 5 %-points higher, respectively, due to a rapid decrease in PV postpartum. These haematological alterations were followed by a 5 and 6%-point increase in Wmax and VO2peak, which is higher than the reported %TE for these measurements. Together, this could indicate that pregnancy-related alterations in haematological measures might potentiate subsequent beneficial training adaptations during the postpartum period. Although our participant’s PV, BV and body mass were not returned to start-pregnancy values in wk 12 postpartum, the progress of these parameters together with the regained absolute VO2peak and improved Wmax suggest a rapid return to start-pregnancy levels, when a reasonable progression in training volume and intensity is ensured. Indicatively, L4 decreased after a long period of reduced training volume and intensity, despite a greater dilution of blood lactate in the 4% higher BV, but quickly improved with increased volume and intensity. This is in line with a previous study (Solli and Sandbakk, 2018), where VO2 at the estimated lactate threshold rapidly increased up to- (wk 6–12), and above (wk 13–20) pre-pregnancy values during the postpartum period in a successful Olympic athlete. Overall, this case study suggests some lingering hematological benefits and underlines the positive effect of a quick resumption of LIT with a gradually increasing intensity of training in the first 12 weeks after delivery. Together, this highlights the necessity of further investigations of the associations between endurance training at different intensities, haematological alterations, VO2peak, and endurance performance in female athletes during and after pregnancy.

While the previously estimated risk of premature birth and low birth-weight following high volumes of endurance training during pregnancy, has been rejected (Haakstad and Bo, 2011; Thangaratinam et al., 2012; Di Mascio et al., 2016), findings indicate an increased abortion risk with very high training volumes and/or HIT during the first weeks after conception (Hegaard et al., 2016). In this context, the total training volume performed during pregnancy in the current case is clearly lower than in a previous study (Solli and Sandbakk, 2018) but showed the same relative reductions in training volume throughout pregnancy as previous studies (Potteiger et al., 1993; Bailey et al., 1998; Solli and Sandbakk, 2018; Sundgot-Borgen et al., 2019). In contrast to these studies, our participant also conducted relatively large amounts of HIT during the first trimester. This can be seen as controversial as a previous study has indicated that fetal wellbeing may be compromised during HIT (>90% HRpeak) among pregnant athletes (Salvesen et al., 2012). However, other studies report overall fetal wellbeing as reassuring after short-duration, strenuous exercise in both active (Anderson et al., 2021) and inactive pregnant women (Szymanski and Satin, 2012). Furthermore, elite athletes exercising >8–10 h wk−1 during pregnancy have not been reported to be at higher risk of complications during delivery or to affect the child negatively compared to non-exercising women (Sigurdardottir et al., 2019). Most importantly, the present participant bore a healthy child and no adverse effects of maintaining a high amount of HIT during the first trimester were found. However, the current recommendation of MIT rather than HIT during pregnancy seems reasonable, as it likely induces satisfactory physiological adaptations while avoiding any possible risks associated with performing HIT during pregnancy. In this participant, a gradual increase from 17% HIT sessions during the first 6 weeks postpartum, to 37% HIT sessions in the weeks 6–12 post partum, may have been beneficial since VO2peak, and Wmax increased above start-pregnancy levels.


Despite structured endurance training and substantial increases in both red blood cell volume and blood volume, no increase in absolute VO2peak was observed from gestational week 2 to 14 in this case-study of a well-trained cyclist. Although the training intensity distribution was changed, and included less HIT and relatively more LIT, power output at 4 mmol L−1 [BLa] was maintained until gestational week 33. After delivery, red blood cell volume remained 5% above start-pregnancy levels and VO2peak increased by 6%-points when HIT was re-introduced, with a concomitant 5% increase in Wmax from week 6 to 12 postpartum. Accordingly, this illustrates a disassociation between haematological values and VO2peak during pregnancy and a quick improvement of endurance performance after delivery when gradually returning to start-pregnancy training levels.

Although the methodology used in this study is not suitable for establishing cause-and-effect relationships, the study highlights the necessity of further investigating the associations between endurance training at different intensities, haematological measures, VO2peak, and endurance performance in female athletes during and after pregnancy. Furthermore, the study can be used as a framework for future studies investigating pregnant endurance athletes.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusion of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Regionale komiteer for medisinsk og helsefaglig forskningsetikk (REK midt). The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author Contributions

NA and ØS contributed to conception and design of the study. NA executed the study, collected and summarized the data. NA and GS wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.


Almquist N. W., Eriksen H. B., Wilhelmsen M., Hamarsland H., Ing S., Ellefsen S., et al. (2022). No Differences between 12 Weeks of Block- vs. Traditional-Periodized Training in Performance Adaptations in Trained Cyclists. Front. Physiol. 13, 837634–837713. doi:10.3389/fphys.2022.837634

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Almquist N. W., Løvlien I., Byrkjedal P. T., Spencer M., Kristoffersen M., Skovereng K., et al. (2020). Effects of Including Sprints in One Weekly Low-Intensity Training Session during the Transition Period of Elite Cyclists. Front. Physiol. 11, 1000–1012. doi:10.3389/fphys.2020.01000

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Almquist N. W., Wilhelmsen M., Ellefsen S., Sandbakk Ø., Rønnestad B. R. (2021). Effects of Including Sprints in LIT Sessions during a 14-d Camp on Muscle Biology and Performance Measures in Elite Cyclists. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 53, 2333–2345. doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000002709

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Anderson J., Pudwell J., Mcauslan C., Barr L., Kehoe J., Davies G. A. (2021). Acute Fetal Response to High-Intensity Interval Training in the Second and Third Trimesters of Pregnancy. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 46, 1552–1558. doi:10.1139/apnm-2020-1086

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bailey D., Davies B., Budgett R., Sanderson D., Griffin D. (1998). Endurance Training during a Twin Pregnancy in a marathon Runner. The Lancet 351, 1182. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)79128-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bø K., Artal R., Barakat R., Brown W., Davies G. A., Dooley M., et al. (2016). Exercise and Pregnancy in Recreational and Elite Athletes: 2016 Evidence Summary from the IOC Expert Group Meeting, Lausanne. Part 1-exercise in Women Planning Pregnancy and Those Who Are Pregnant. Br. J. Sports Med. 50, 571–589. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096218

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Buchheit M., Laursen P. B. (2013). High-Intensity Interval Training, Solutions to the Programming Puzzle. Sports Med. 43, 313–338. doi:10.1007/s40279-013-0029-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Clapp J. F., Capeless E. (1997). Cardiovascular Function before, during, and after the First and Subsequent Pregnancies. Am. J. Cardiol. 80, 1469–1473. doi:10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00738-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Decroix L., De Pauw K., Foster C., Meeusen R. (2016). Guidelines to Classify Female Subject Groups in Sport-Science Research. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 11, 204–213. doi:10.1123/ijspp.2015-0153

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Di Mascio D., Magro-Malosso E. R., Saccone G., Marhefka G. D., Berghella V. (2016). Exercise during Pregnancy in normal-weight Women and Risk of Preterm Birth: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 215, 561–571. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Duvekot J. J., Cheriex E. C., Pieters F. A. A., Menheere P. P. C. A., Peeters L. L. H. (1993). Early Pregnancy Changes in Hemodynamics and Volume Homeostasis Are Consecutive Adjustments Triggered by a Primary Fall in Systemic Vascular Tone. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 169, 1382–1392. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(93)90405-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ekholm E. M. K., Erkkola R. U. (1996). Autonomic Cardiovascular Control in Pregnancy. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 64, 29–36. doi:10.1016/0301-2115(95)02255-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gilson G., Samaan S., Crawford M., Quails C., Curet L. (1997). Changes in Hemodynamics, Ventricular Remodeling, and Ventricular Contractility during normal Pregnancy: a Longitudinal Study. Obstet. Gynecol. 89, 957–962. doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(97)85765-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gozubuyuk A. A., Dag H., Kacar A., Karakurt Y., Arica V. (2017). Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Clinical Evaluation, and Treatment of Carbon Monoxide Poisoning in Child, Infant, and Fetus. North. Clin. Istanb 4, 100–107. doi:10.14744/nci.2017.49368

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Haakstad L. A., Bø K. (2011). Exercise in Pregnant Women and Birth Weight: a Randomized Controlled Trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 11, 66. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-11-66

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hegaard H. K., Ersbøll A. S., Damm P. (2016). Exercise in Pregnancy: First Trimester Risks. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 59, 559–567. doi:10.1097/grf.0000000000000200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kardel K. R. (2005). Effects of Intense Training during and after Pregnancy in Top-Level Athletes. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 15, 79–86. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2004.00426.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Laursen P. B., Jenkins D. G. (2002). The Scientific Basis for High-Intensity Interval Training. Sports Med. 32, 53–73. doi:10.2165/00007256-200232010-00003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lundby C., Robach P. (2015). Performance Enhancement: What Are the Physiological Limits? Physiology 30, 282–292. doi:10.1152/physiol.00052.2014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Morris E. A., Hale S. A., Badger G. J., Magness R. R., Bernstein I. M. (2015). Pregnancy Induces Persistent Changes in Vascular Compliance in Primiparous Women. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 212, 633–636. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mottola M. F., Davenport M. H., Ruchat S.-M., Davies G. A., Poitras V., Gray C., et al. (2018). No. 367-2019 Canadian Guideline for Physical Activity throughout Pregnancy. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 40, 1528–1537. doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2018.07.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pivarnik J. M., Mauer M. B., Ayres N. A., Kirshon B., Dildy G. A., Cotton D. B. (1994). Effects of Chronic Exercise on Blood Volume Expansion and Hematologic Indices during Pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 83, 265–269.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Potteiger J. A., Welch J. C., Byrne J. C. (1993). From Parturition to marathon. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 25, 673–677. doi:10.1249/00005768-199306000-00004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rønnestad B. R., Hamarsland H., Hansen J., Holen E., Montero D., Whist J. E., et al. (2021). Five Weeks of Heat Training Increases Haemoglobin Mass in Elite Cyclists. Exp. Physiol. 106, 316–327. doi:10.1113/EP088544

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Salvesen K. Å., Hem E., Sundgot-Borgen J. (2012). Fetal Wellbeing May Be Compromised during Strenuous Exercise Among Pregnant Elite Athletes. Br. J. Sports Med. 46, 279–283. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2010.080259

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Seiler S. (2010). What Is Best Practice for Training Intensity and Duration Distribution in Endurance Athletes? Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 5, 276–291. doi:10.1123/ijspp.5.3.276

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Siebenmann C., Robach P., Jacobs R. A., Rasmussen P., Nordsborg N., Diaz V., et al. (2012). "Live High-Train Low" Using Normobaric Hypoxia: a Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study. J. Appl. Physiol. 112, 106–117. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00388.2011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sigurdardottir T., Steingrimsdottir T., Geirsson R. T., Halldorsson T. I., Aspelund T., Bø K. (2019). Do female Elite Athletes Experience More Complicated Childbirth Than Non-athletes? A Case-Control Study. Br. J. Sports Med. 53, 354–358. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2018-099447

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Solli G. S., Sandbakk Ø. (2018). Training Characteristics during Pregnancy and Postpartum in the World's Most Successful Cross Country Skier. Front. Physiol. 9, 595. doi:10.3389/fphys.2018.00595

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sundgot-Borgen J., Sundgot-Borgen C., Myklebust G., Sølvberg N., Torstveit M. K. (2019). Elite Athletes Get Pregnant, Have Healthy Babies and Return to Sport Early Postpartum. BMJ Open Sport Exerc. Med. 5, e000652. doi:10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000652

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Szymanski L. M., Satin A. J. (2012). Strenuous Exercise during Pregnancy: Is There a Limit? Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 207, 179. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2012.07.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thangaratinam S., Rogozińska E., Jolly K., Glinkowski S., Duda W., Borowiack E., et al. (2012). Interventions to Reduce or Prevent Obesity in Pregnant Women: a Systematic Review. Health Technol. Assess. 16, 1. doi:10.3310/hta16310

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: structured endurance training, gestation, haemoglobin mass, endurance performance, trimester, cycling

Citation: Almquist NW, Sandbakk Ø and Solli GS (2022) Performance-Related Physiological and Haematological Changes During Pregnancy and Postpartum in a Well-Trained Cyclist Performing Endurance Training. Front. Physiol. 13:762950. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.762950

Received: 23 August 2021; Accepted: 13 April 2022;
Published: 09 May 2022.

Edited by:

Martin Burtscher, University of Innsbruck, Austria

Reviewed by:

Andrzej Pokrywka, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland
Hannes Gatterer, Eurac Research, Italy

Copyright © 2022 Almquist, Sandbakk and Solli. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Nicki Winfield Almquist,