Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Physiol., 26 September 2023
Sec. Aquatic Physiology
This article is part of the Research Topic The physiological response of aquatic invertebrates to pollution View all 6 articles

Editorial: The physiological response of aquatic invertebrates to pollution

  • 1Department Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies (DiSTeBA), Salento University, Lecce, Italy
  • 2National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC), Palermo, Italy
  • 3Department of Biology, School of Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy

Chemical pollution, derived from either point and non-point pollution sources, represents one of the main threats to aquatic environments. Chemical pollutants such as trace metals, oil-based products, pesticides, fertilizers, antifouling compounds, plastic materials, pharmaceutical and veterinary products represent a worldwide menace to the health of aquatic organisms (Tornero and Hanke, 2016).

Many physiological responses are developed by the organisms at the molecular, cellular, and organism levels to cope with environmental pollution, including activation of detoxification processes, repair responses, metabolic changes, and alterations of physiological functions. The information gained through these responses can facilitate our understanding of the mechanistic basis of pollutant toxicity, organisms’ compensation, and acclimatization processes, and may be useful in predicting pollutant impact on the biota. Therefore, the detection of the physiological responses to pollutants and their quantification represents an important and useful tool to assess the quality of the environment and to support biodiversity conservation strategies. Among aquatic organisms, invertebrates represent most of the species, with 97% of the species living in marine habitats and 3% in fresh-water habitats (Rosner et al., 2023). They perform crucial ecological functions in all aquatic ecosystems (Palumbi et al., 2009) having colonized a large spectrum of ecological niches. This information highlights the importance of the study of invertebrate response to pollution in aquatic environments for assessing the impact of environmental stressors on biodiversity and natural resources. The advances in “omics” and bioinformatics methodologies in the last decade provide powerful new approaches for fast and effectively acquiring important knowledge about the mechanistic mode of action of pollutants, single or in a mixture, and their impact on the organisms’ physiological status (Lionetto et al., 2021).

The Research Topic entitled “The physiological response of aquatic invertebrates to pollution” published in Frontiers in Physiology provides emerging knowledge into this multifaceted research field.

Among aquatic pollutants, microplastics/nanoplastics have become a priority issue in recent years due to their widespread distribution into the environment and raise concerns about their potential toxicity to aquatic organisms. Little is known in the literature on the long-term effects of micro-nano plastics on aquatic organisms and on possible acclimation mechanisms to counteract the effects of microplastic/nanoplastic exposure. Rades et al. focused on this field by studying the long-term responses of reef-building stony corals to microplastics. In these organisms, it is known that exposure to microplastics is associated with negative health effects (Reichert et al., 2021) including growth reduction (Hankins et al., 2018), feeding rate lowering (Corinaldesi et al., 2021), alteration in the immune system (Tang et al., 2018). On a long-term scale, the authors did not find any acclimatization process in the feeding and defense behavior that could help corals to better cope with this environmental stressor. Therefore, they suggest that, in the absence of any acclimation process, microplastic pollution might constitute a constant stressor for coral organisms, likely leading to sustained energy costs and health impairment. The work of Almulhim et al. opens perspectives for a deeper understanding of the physiology of aquatic organisms through a metabolomic approach. The author deepened the analysis of the Tridacna maxima giant clam, a significant component of tropical Indo-Pacific coral reef communities (Neo et al., 2015), and illustrates the power of invertebrate metabolite profiling for monitoring plastic-related aquatic pollutants.

Moreover, the Research Topic focuses on coastal and estuarine environments that are heavily influenced by natural and anthropogenic activities and greatly affected by chemical pollution. In particular, pesticides used in agriculture and aquaculture and chemicals used as biocides in antifouling paints are the most diffuse coastal pollutants, representing a serious threat to the physiology of non-target organisms. Daoud et al. analyzed the effects on the development, growth, and metabolism of lobster at stage IV (Homarus americanus) following chronic exposure to sediments spiked with commercial formulations of deltamethrin and permethrin, common pyrethroid pesticides used on crops as well as applied to aquaculture pens. Both compounds caused an increased frequency of malformations. While permethrin’s main effects were sublethal, deltamethrin increased lobster mortality. The results highlight the potential of pesticides released into the coastal areas for effects on non-target marine organisms. The paper of Cima and Varello focuses on antifouling compounds, in particular copper-based antifouling paints whose worldwide diffusion has increased copper release into coastal environments and its potential impact on either target or non-target organisms. This work analyzes the immunotoxic effects of the exposure to the antifouling copper(I) biocide on target and non-target bivalve species with a comparative in vitro approach on 1h cultured hemocytes of Mytilus galloprovincialis, a dominant species in the macrofouling community, and Ruditapes philippinarum, a non-target species of antifouling paint chemicals. The authors suggest a potential mechanism of oxidative stress-immunotoxicity-cell toxicity of Cu(I) ions in these two species, involving both direct and indirect interactions with copper ions. The analysis of the cellular and molecular responses developed by the hemocytes of the two species towards antifouling copper(I) biocide highlights the higher sensitivity of the non-target species, raising great concern for the potentially negative effects of antifouling biocides on the survival of non-target key species in the coastal environment.

The work of André et al. takes into consideration another aspect of great concern for aquatic environment pollution, such as the impact on the biota of municipal effluents which are well-recognized for their interfering activity on sexual differentiation and reproduction (André et al., 2020). In particular, the authors examined the combined effects of sewer overflow, which is increased by rain due to climate change, and municipal effluents on freshwater Elliptio complanata mussels.

In conclusion, the study of “the physiological response of aquatic invertebrates to pollution” is a multifaceted emerging research field whose insight can give a valuable contribution to the understanding of the impact, resistance, and resilience of the organisms to chemical pollution pressure also in consideration of the global climate changes.

Author contributions

MGL: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. VM: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

André C., Vaudreuil M-A., Duy S. V., Sauvé S., Gagné F. (2020). Long-term and comparative impacts of combined sewers and municipal effluents to freshwater mussels. Invert. Surv. J. 17, 75–89. doi:10.25431/1824-307X/isj.v0i0.75-89

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Corinaldesi C., Canensi S., Dell’Anno A., Tangherlini M., Di Capua I., Varrella S., et al. (2021). Multiple impacts of microplastics can threaten marine habitat-forming species. Commun. Biol. 4, 431. doi:10.1038/s42003-021-01961-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hankins C., Duffy A., Drisco K. (2018). Scleractinian coral microplastic ingestion: potential calcification effects, size limits, and retention. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 135, 587–593. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.07.067

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lionetto M. G., Caricato R., Giordano M. E. (2021). Pollution biomarkers in the framework of marine biodiversity conservation: state of art and perspectives. Water 13, 1847. doi:10.3390/w13131847

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Neo M. L., Eckman W., Vicentuan K., Teo S. L. M., Todd P. A. (2015). The ecological significance of giant clams in coral reef ecosystems. Biol. Conserv. 181, 111–123. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Palumbi S. R., Sandifer P. A., Allan J. D., Beck M. W., Fautin D. G., Fogarty M. J., et al. (2009). Managing for ocean biodiversity to sustain marine ecosystem services. Front. Ecol. Environ. 7, 204–211. doi:10.1890/070135

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reichert J., Tirpitz V., Anand R., Bach K., Knopp J., Schubert P., et al. (2021). Interactive effects of microplastic pollution and heat stress on reef-building corals. Environ. Pollut. 290, 118010. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rosner A., Ballarin L., Barnay-Verdier S., Borisenko I., Drago L., Drobne D., et al. (2023). A broad-taxa approach as an important concept in ecotoxicological studies and pollution monitoring. Biol. Rev. doi:10.1111/brv.13015

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tang J., Ni X., Zhou Z., Wang L., Lin S. (2018). Acute microplastic exposure raises stress response and suppresses detoxification and immune capacities in the scleractinian coral pocillopora damicornis. Environ. Pollut. 243, 66–74. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2018.08.045

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tornero V., Hanke G. (2016). Chemical contaminants entering the marine environment from sea-based sources: A review with a focus on European seas. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 112, 17–38. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.06.091

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: invertebrate, pollution, physiological response, microplastics, metals, pesticide, effluent

Citation: Lionetto MG and Matozzo V (2023) Editorial: The physiological response of aquatic invertebrates to pollution. Front. Physiol. 14:1295636. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1295636

Received: 16 September 2023; Accepted: 20 September 2023;
Published: 26 September 2023.

Edited and reviewed by:

Pung Pung Hwang, Academia Sinica, Taiwan

Copyright © 2023 Lionetto and Matozzo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: M. G. Lionetto, giulia.lionetto@unisalento.it

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.