Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Blockchain

Sec. Blockchain for Web3 and the Metaverse

Volume 8 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbloc.2025.1675735

This article is part of the Research TopicBlockchain, Web3, and the Metaverse: Legal, Managerial, and Financial Pathways for Future Business and GovernanceView all articles

Consumer Protection in Blockchain-Based Metaverses: A Comparative Study of Cross-Border Legal Gaps and Platform Governance

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Universidad Loyola Andalucía. Departamento de Derecho, Seville, Spain
  • 2Universidad Loyola Andalucia - Campus de Sevilla, Seville, Spain

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Blockchain-based metaverse platforms such as Decentraland and The Sandbox offer a vision of decentralized digital ownership and seamless cross-border interaction. However, these environments also expose users to significant legal and security risks, particularly due to outdated or fragmented consumer protection frameworks. This article examines how six major jurisdictions—the European Union, United States, China, Singapore, Brazil, and South Korea—approach key legal issues such as jurisdiction, data privacy, liability, and dispute resolution within decentralized virtual worlds. Drawing on legal analysis and existing literature, the article suggests that ongoing regulatory gaps may be one of several factors contributing to declining user engagement. As unresolved conflicts and persistent security vulnerabilities continue to erode trust, users may become increasingly hesitant to participate in these ecosystems. The comparative overview highlights a fragmented legal landscape that does not adequately safeguard consumer rights and raises concerns about the long-term viability of metaverse platforms. To address these challenges, the paper proposes a hybrid framework that combines blockchain-native tools—such as smart contract arbitration—with enforceable legal standards. This approach offers a normative path forward for aligning innovation with legal accountability, helping to foster a more trustworthy, sustainable, and user-centered metaverse.

Keywords: Blockchain-based metaverse, Consumer protection, Jurisdiction and conflict of laws, Decentralized governance (DAOs), Smart contracts, Dispute resolution (ADR/ODR/BDR), Comparative legal analysis

Received: 29 Jul 2025; Accepted: 25 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Lopez Rodriguez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Ana Mercedes Lopez Rodriguez, Universidad Loyola Andalucía. Departamento de Derecho, Seville, Spain

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.