ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Blockchain
Sec. Blockchain for Web3 and the Metaverse
Volume 8 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbloc.2025.1675735
This article is part of the Research TopicBlockchain, Web3, and the Metaverse: Legal, Managerial, and Financial Pathways for Future Business and GovernanceView all articles
Consumer Protection in Blockchain-Based Metaverses: A Comparative Study of Cross-Border Legal Gaps and Platform Governance
Provisionally accepted- 1Universidad Loyola Andalucía. Departamento de Derecho, Seville, Spain
- 2Universidad Loyola Andalucia - Campus de Sevilla, Seville, Spain
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Blockchain-based metaverse platforms such as Decentraland and The Sandbox offer a vision of decentralized digital ownership and seamless cross-border interaction. However, these environments also expose users to significant legal and security risks, particularly due to outdated or fragmented consumer protection frameworks. This article examines how six major jurisdictions—the European Union, United States, China, Singapore, Brazil, and South Korea—approach key legal issues such as jurisdiction, data privacy, liability, and dispute resolution within decentralized virtual worlds. Drawing on legal analysis and existing literature, the article suggests that ongoing regulatory gaps may be one of several factors contributing to declining user engagement. As unresolved conflicts and persistent security vulnerabilities continue to erode trust, users may become increasingly hesitant to participate in these ecosystems. The comparative overview highlights a fragmented legal landscape that does not adequately safeguard consumer rights and raises concerns about the long-term viability of metaverse platforms. To address these challenges, the paper proposes a hybrid framework that combines blockchain-native tools—such as smart contract arbitration—with enforceable legal standards. This approach offers a normative path forward for aligning innovation with legal accountability, helping to foster a more trustworthy, sustainable, and user-centered metaverse.
Keywords: Blockchain-based metaverse, Consumer protection, Jurisdiction and conflict of laws, Decentralized governance (DAOs), Smart contracts, Dispute resolution (ADR/ODR/BDR), Comparative legal analysis
Received: 29 Jul 2025; Accepted: 25 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Lopez Rodriguez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Ana Mercedes Lopez Rodriguez, Universidad Loyola Andalucía. Departamento de Derecho, Seville, Spain
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.