ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Blockchain
Sec. Blockchain Security and Privacy
This article is part of the Research TopicSecure Blockchain Applications for Smart Cities: Enhancing Trust, Privacy, and ResilienceView all articles
Towards a Refined Architecture for Socio-Technical Decentralized Identity(DID) Services
Provisionally accepted- 1Ewha Women's University School of Business, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- 2Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Gumi-si, Republic of Korea
- 3Gachon University, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea
- 4Ewha Womans University Ewha Institute for the Humanities, Seodaemun-gu, Republic of Korea
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Digital identity technology is emerging as a foundational infrastructure for individuals and society, driven by escalating incidents of identity theft, account hacking, and large-scale personal data breaches. According to Gartner (2024), tThese security and privacy concerns are accelerating the global shift toward secure, user-centric identity management systems, with blockchain-based Decentralized Identity (DID) models at the foreforntforefront. The accelerating adoption of artificial intelligence and the escalating risks of identity theft and large-scale data breaches have intensified global demand for secure, privacy-preserving digital identity solutions. Blockchain-based Decentralized Identity (DID) services, groundedrootedgrounded in the principles of Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI), are increasingly recognized as a foundational technology for safeguarding personal data and enabling user-controlled identity management. However, existing DID research and implementations remain predominantly technology-focused, often overlooking socio-technical factors such as governance, usability, and stakeholder trust. This study proposes an STS-based (Socio-Technical Systems) framework to guide the practical and scalable adoption of DID services, integrating both social components (e.g., governance, sustainability, user-centric design) and technical components (e.g., decentralization, privacy preservation, interoperability, security). Using an integrative research review methodology, the framework was developed through systematic analysis of global standards, industry cases, and academic literature, and validated by a multidisciplinary expert panel. Building on this framework, we introduce a Refined DID Service Architecture optimized for enterprise-level deployment, incorporating privacy-preserving mechanisms at the infrastructure level, consensus-based governance, and standardized UI/UX guidelines. The proposed architecture addresses key barriers to adoption—such as interoperability gaps, regulatory inconsistencies, and limited user engagement—while ensuring scalability and compliance with global standards. The study contributes to both theory and practice by (1) framing DID as a socio-technical system, (2) providing an actionable evaluation framework for developers, regulators, and service providers, and (3) offering a globally adaptable architecture that balances technological robustness with social acceptance.
Keywords: Decentralized Identity Service, DID(Decentralized Identity), Blockchain, SSI, Socio-technical system theory
Received: 01 Sep 2025; Accepted: 31 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Hwang, Park, Oh and Chai. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Sangmi Chai, smchai@ewha.ac.kr
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
