ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Built Environ.

Sec. Construction Management

Volume 11 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2025.1456893

This article is part of the Research TopicDoctoral Research in Construction ManagementView all 11 articles

A Mixed Method Approach to Validating Barriers to Safety Incentives Implementation in the Nigerian Construction Industry

Provisionally accepted
  • Sustainable Human Settlement and Construction Research Centre, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The position of safety incentives in the construction industry emerged from the demands to align employees with organisation performance-related goals, improve workplace safety practices, and share risk between clients and contractors. This study aims to identify and validate barriers to safety incentives implementation in the construction industry using an exploratory sequential mixed method. The study addresses this critical gap by delving into construction organisations' challenges in implementing safety incentives. Twenty-three of thirty-two identified barriers to implementing safety incentives from the literature review were validated through a Delphi survey using expert panellists' opinions. Quantitative data was obtained from construction professionals (architects, builders, engineers, and quantity surveyors) using a structured questionnaire in Lagos, Nigeria, through a simple random sampling technique. Descriptive and exploratory factor analysis was conducted on the retrieved data and Cronbach’s alpha test to determine data reliability and interrelatedness. Twenty-four validated barriers to safety incentives implementation in the construction industry were clustered into six factors: discrepancies in the incentive rewards process, lack of incentive budget planning, conflicting incentive performance indicators, absence of a national safety incentive policy, construction firms' governance systems, and lack of automation in the incentive implementation process. The practical implication of this study is that it provides a better understanding of national safety policy, incentives, key performance indicators, and scheme selection approaches to promote the implementation of safety incentives. The study provides actionable recommendations for construction stakeholders, government agencies, professional institutions, safety managers, and policymakers to prioritise incentive budget planning, incentive reward approaches, automation processes, and key performance indicators to improve safety incentive implementation. The study concluded by calling on construction stakeholders' commitment to developing safety incentives and performance goals that will not conflict with health and safety and will create workplace tension among workers.

Keywords: barriers, Construction firms, Health and safety, Safety incentives, mixed method, Nigeria

Received: 29 Jun 2024; Accepted: 23 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Ogundipe, Aigbavboa and Ogunbayo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Kunle Elizah Ogundipe, Sustainable Human Settlement and Construction Research Centre, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.