ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Built Environ.

Sec. Urban Science

Volume 11 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2025.1586040

This article is part of the Research TopicEnhancing Resilience in Complex Systems: Transdisciplinary and Systems Approaches to Sustainable Infrastructure and Urban DevelopmentView all 4 articles

Socially Inclusive Infrastructure for Disaster Risk Reduction in Urban Planning: Insights from the SADC Region

Provisionally accepted
Wilfred  LungaWilfred Lunga1,2,3Gcina  MalandelaGcina Malandela1Jane F  KaifaJane F Kaifa4Caiphus  BaloyiCaiphus Baloyi1*Charles  MusarurwaCharles Musarurwa4Tlou  RamorokaTlou Ramoroka5Olivia  KungumaOlivia Kunguma6
  • 1Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa
  • 2University of the Free State (UFS)’s Disaster Management Training and Education Centre (DIMTEC), South Africa, Bloemfontein, South Africa
  • 3Northwest University’s African Centre for Disaster Studies (ACDS), South Africa, Potchstroom, South Africa
  • 4Midlands State University, Gweru, Zimbabwe
  • 5University of Limpopo, Sovenga, Limpopo, South Africa
  • 6University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, Free State, South Africa

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The accelerating pace of urbanization in the 21st century has intensified the need for inclusive and resilient infrastructure development, particularly in the face of rising socio-economic inequalities and escalating disaster risks. This study explores the integration of social equity dimensions and Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) principles within urban planning frameworks as a pathway toward sustainable and resilient urban futures. Adopting a qualitative research design, the study draws on a triangulated methodology that includes document analysis, an extensive literature review, and selected case studies on urban planning practices. These methods were employed to interrogate current urban development paradigms and assess the extent to which equity and resilience are operationalized in planning processes. Findings indicate that, despite growing theoretical advancements in equitable and risk-sensitive urban development, significant systemic challenges remain. These include limited community participation in planning processes, persistent institutional silos, and resource constraints that hinder transformative action. The analysis further reveals that current urban governance mechanisms often lack the capacity to meaningfully integrate long-term resilience and equity considerations. In response to these challenges, the study recommends a paradigm shift in urban planning towards the adoption of future-oriented and participatory approaches. Key policy recommendations include: (1) embedding equity-focused DRR strategies within urban development policies; (2) fostering multi-stakeholder collaboration to bridge institutional divides; and (3) mainstreaming anticipatory and inclusive planning models in urban governance systems. Such integrative approaches are essential for aligning infrastructure development with the broader goals of social justice, environmental sustainability, and urban resilience.

Keywords: Infrastructure development, social equity, urban planning, Planning frameworks, Systemic barriers, Disaster Risk Reduction

Received: 01 Mar 2025; Accepted: 29 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Lunga, Malandela, Kaifa, Baloyi, Musarurwa, Ramoroka and Kunguma. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Caiphus Baloyi, Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.