ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Built Environ.
Sec. Earthquake Engineering
Volume 11 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2025.1590479
This article is part of the Research TopicNHERI 2015-2025: A Decade of Discovery in Natural Hazards EngineeringView all 12 articles
An open-source simulation platform to support and foster research collaboration in natural hazards engineering
Provisionally accepted- 1Stanford University, Stanford, United States
- 2University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States
- 3University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
- 4University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States
- 5University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States
- 6University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
- 7University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Computational simulation is a critical tool for assessing the impacts of natural hazards and informing risk mitigation and resilience strategies. The NHERI SimCenter has developed an open-source, modular framework that integrates performance-based engineering methodologies with regionalscale assessments to enable multi-hazard, multi-scale simulations. This paper presents the conceptual foundation and current capabilities of the SimCenter platform, covering hazard characterization, structural response analysis, damage and loss estimation, and recovery modeling. By leveraging high-performance computing, standardized data schemas, and open-source tools, the platform facilitates transparent, reproducible research while bridging local and regional analyses. Key contributions include improved inventory generation, damage simulation, and recovery analysis, with applications extending across multiple hazard domains. The paper also discusses challenges in implementing high-resolution, high-fidelity simulations, advancing multi-hazard assessments, and enhancing accessibility for a broad user base. Looking ahead, expanding hazard models, refining regional-to-local modeling techniques, and fostering community collaboration will be essential for advancing computational simulation in natural hazards engineering. Through continued development, the SimCenter aims to provide researchers and practitioners with scalable, adaptable tools to enhance disaster risk assessment and resilience planning.discusses emerging needs and challenges for computational simulation in disaster risk management over the next decade and beyond. The SimCenter's framework and models draw from extensive past research, notably performancebased earthquake engineering (PBEE) methodologies from the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center. It also incorporates contributions from other large research centers, including the Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER), the Mid-America Earthquake (MAE) Center, and the Natural Hazards Center. Additionally, the framework integrates methodologies from major government-funded initiatives for disaster mitigation and response, such as Hazus (FEMA, 2024a), FEMA 273 (FEMA, 1997), and FEMA P-58 (FEMA, 2012). Input from practicing engineers, including SEAOC's VISION 2000 (SEAOC, 1995) and SPUR's Resilient City (SPUR, 2009), and successful technology transfer collaborations between academia and industry have further informed the development of the SimCenter's simulation tools.Complementary efforts to identify key research gaps and emerging areas have shaped the SimCenter's vision and developments.
Keywords: computational Simulation, natural hazards engineering, Regional risk assessment, Multi-hazard analysis, Recovery analysis
Received: 09 Mar 2025; Accepted: 25 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zsarnoczay, Deierlein, McKenna, Schoettler, Yi, Cetiner, Satish, Zhao, Bonus, Melaku, Naeimi, Arduino, Davidson, Gorle, Govindjee, Kareem, Kijewski-Correa, Lowes, Motley, Spence, Taciroglu, Taflanidis and DeJong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Adam Zsarnoczay, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.