Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Built Environ.

Sec. Construction Materials

Volume 11 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2025.1632901

This article is part of the Research TopicSynergistic Innovation of Sustainable and High-Performance Materials: Performance Optimization and Engineering Applications of Environmentally Friendly Construction MaterialsView all articles

Mechanical, Chemical Performance, and Microstructural Behavior of Montmorillonite-Burnt Red Soil Bricks Incorporating Coffee Ash Biochar

Provisionally accepted
Amani  Abdallah HepautwaAmani Abdallah Hepautwa1*Yusufu Abeid  Chande JandeYusufu Abeid Chande Jande2
  • 1Mwalimu Julius K. Nyerere University of Agriculture and Technology, Mara, Tanzania
  • 2Nelson Mandela African Institute of Science and Technology, Arusha, Tanzania

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

This paper investigates the application of circular economy principles by recycling spent coffee grounds (SCG) to produce coffee ash biochar (CAB), which is then used in the creation of burnt red soil bricks (BRSB) fired at temperatures between 900°C and 1100°C, with 10% Montmorillonite as an additive [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Comprehensive comparisons were made using coffee ash pyrolyzed at temperatures of 300°C, 350°C, and 500°C, as substitutes for red soil at replacement levels of 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%. The results indicated a decreasing trend in the mechanical properties of the burnt red soil bricks with increasing coffee ash content. Under optimal water-cement (w/c) ratios, the compressive strength (CS) of red soil bricks containing 5% SCG increased by 49.7% compared to the control when pyrolyzed at 350°C. For bricks with 10% SCG, compressive strength improved by 53.5%, while flexural strength (FS) increased by 66.1% and splitting tensile strength (TS) rose by 38.4% when pyrolyzed at 300°C. Additionally, the study found significant reductions in water, chloride, and sulfur penetration by 41.5%, 44.4%, and 34.3%, respectively, indicating improved durability and resistance to environmental factors. The water permeability coefficient remained relatively consistent across samples. This innovative approach addresses the disposal challenges of spent coffee grounds while benefiting both the economy and the environment. This study demonstrates the feasibility of incorporating SCG into burnt red soil bricks and examines the impact of SCG on their performance. Experimental results were analyzed through range analysis and analysis of variance to identify optimal combinations for varying performance requirements. Microstructural evaluations were performed using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), X-ray Diffraction (XRD), Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), and Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) techniques [7]. These analyses provided insights into the structural integrity and bonding mechanisms within the composite materials. The findings suggest that SCG pyrolyzed at 300°C and 350°C, particularly at a 10% and 5% replacement level, delivers the best mechanical and chemical performance [8,9]. The study highlights the environmental benefits of using spent coffee grounds (SCG) in red soil brick manufacturing, reducing landfill waste and carbon emissions.

Keywords: Coffee ash biochar, red soil bricks, Pyrolysis, Mechanical Properties, microstructure, sustainability

Received: 21 May 2025; Accepted: 18 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Hepautwa and Jande. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Amani Abdallah Hepautwa, Mwalimu Julius K. Nyerere University of Agriculture and Technology, Mara, Tanzania

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.