ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Built Environ.

Sec. Sustainable Design and Construction

Volume 11 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2025.1646565

This article is part of the Research TopicHolistic Life Cycle Thinking for Sustainable Product Design and TechnologyView all articles

Circular approach of greener broiler chicken production

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, Institute of Water and Environmental Management, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
  • 2National Laboratory for Water Science and Water Safety, Debrecen, Hungary

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The sustainability of agricultural production is a key issue, particularly in terms of fertilizer use, greenhouse gas emissions, and resource depletion. This study uses life cycle assessment (LCA) to compare the environmental impacts of composted and pelletized poultry manure (CPPL) and six different fertilizers (ammonium nitrate (AN), calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN), urea, monoammonium phosphate (MAP), triple superphosphate (TSP), and potassium chloride (KCl)AN, CAN, urea, MAP, TSP, KCl) during corn and winter wheat production, as well as their impact on broiler chicken production. The study also took into account different fertilization methods and seasonal variations (summer and winter rotation), analyzing eleven environmental impact categories, including global warming potential (GWP), acidification potential (AP), eutrophication potential (EP), abiotic resource use (abiotic depletion potential for elements (ADPe), abiotic depletion potential for fossil fuels (ADPf)), ozone layer depletion potential (ODP), photochemical oxidation potential (POP) and ecotoxicity potentials (freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity potential (FAETP), human toxicity potential (HTP), marine aquatic ecotoxicity potential (MAETP), terrestrial ecotoxicity potential (TETP)).Based on the results, GWP was 11-14% lower for CPPL production compared to fertilizers, while ADPf was 14-56% lower. At the same time, AP was significantly higher for CPPL, mainly due to ammonia emissions. In crop production (corn, winter wheat), CPPL-based nutrient replenishment resulted in 11-34% lower GWP and 14-56% lower ADPf in most environmental scenarios compared to fertilizer treatments. In toxic impact categories (e.g., FAETP, MAETP), reductions of 3-15% were observed. However, AP values were 2.6-6.8% higher, and EP could be up to twice as high as for fertilizer treatments. In broiler chicken farming, when feed was produced from CPPL-grown crops, the environmental impact was 30-formázott: Bekezdés alapbetűtípusa, magyar formázott: Bekezdés alapbetűtípusa, magyar 85% lower in almost all categories examined than with fertilizer-based feed. Seasonal differences were moderate, with a 3-5% increase in some categories during winter.Based on the results, CPPL offers a promising alternative to chemical fertilizers, especially in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and nutrient leaching. In line with circular economy principles, CPPL can contribute to the development of more sustainable agricultural systems.

Keywords: life cycle assessment (LCA), CPPL, chemical fertilizers, Maize, winter wheat, Broiler chickens, sustainability, greenhouse gases táblázatot formázott formázott: Betűtípus: Félkövér formázott: Betűtípus: (Alapérték) Times New Roman

Received: 13 Jun 2025; Accepted: 14 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Kiss, Nagy and Tamás. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Nikolett Éva Kiss, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, Institute of Water and Environmental Management, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.