Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Built Environ.

Sec. Earthquake Engineering

Volume 11 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2025.1652972

This article is part of the Research TopicRecent Advances in Smart Structures for Vibration Control and Structural Health Monitoring: Focusing on Sustainable Approaches and Digital InnovationsView all 4 articles

Optimal Placement and Design of M-STLCDs in n-Story Buildings: A Comparative Study with M-TMDs and M-TLCDs

Provisionally accepted
  • University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

This study proposes a novel optimization procedure for the seismic vibration control of multi-degreeof-freedom systems incorporating Multiple Sliding Tuned Liquid Column Dampers (M-STLCDs). Unlike conventional compliant liquid-based devices, the proposed system consists of multiple translating U-shaped liquid containers, each independently tuned to a specific structural mode, enabling multi-modal control, particularly suited for stiff structures and not previously explored in the literature. The procedure can optimize and install one device at a time while accounting for the modifications introduced by prior installations, ensuring a progressive adaptation of the control system to the dynamic characteristics of the structure. For each single STLCD, the procedure considers both the optimal location in the building and the fundamental mode to be controlled. More specifically, for each STLCD, the procedure detects the optimal floor where the device should be placed and optimizes the damping and the natural frequency of the spring-dashpot unit, the head-loss coefficient and the natural frequency characterizing the liquid. To prove the effectiveness of the optimal placement of the devices, the optimization procedure was applied on two different types of shear-type structures, i.e., on a three-story and a six-story structure, subjected to a broadband and zero-mean white noise process. Moreover, the control performance of the device was evaluated both in the time and the frequency domain and under recorded seismic events, in comparison with optimized configurations of traditional devices, such as Multiple Tuned Mass Dampers (M-TMDs) and Multiple Tuned Liquid Column Dampers (M-TLCDs).

Keywords: Sequential optimization algorithm, Passive control device, liquid-based absorbers, STLCD, multi-modal control, optimal design

Received: 24 Jun 2025; Accepted: 29 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Masnata, Di Trapani, Russotto and Pirrotta. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Chiara Masnata, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.