Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Built Environ.

Sec. Earthquake Engineering

Challenges and Solutions in Reinforcing Self-Built Homes: Experiences from Villa Maria del Triunfo, Lima, Peru

Provisionally accepted
Emilio  José Medrano-SánchezEmilio José Medrano-Sánchez1*Magaly  Cinthia FabianMagaly Cinthia Fabian2
  • 1Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola S.R.L, Lima, Peru
  • 2Universidad Cesar Vallejo, Trujillo, Peru

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

This study assesses H-shaped steel profiles (W8×31) as a retrofit solution for self-built dwellings 3 in the Human Settlement (AA.HH). Ciudad de Gosen, Villa Mar´ıa del Triunfo (Lima, Peru). A 4 four-part workflow was applied: (i) field diagnosis with the Peruvian National Institute of Civil 5 Defense (INDECI, by its Spanish acronym) checklist to classify seismic vulnerability and document 6 construction pathologies; (ii) numerical modeling in "Extended Three-Dimensional Analysis of 7 Building Systems" (ETABS) v18 under Peruvian Standard E.030 to characterize story drift, 8 torsion, and center of rigidity; (iii) retrofit design that anchors and welds W8×31 profiles along 9 critical load paths; and (iv) experimental verification at National University of Engineering (UNI) 10 Materials Testing Laboratory (LEM) following Peruvian Technical Standard (NTP) 350.405:2019 11 on representative columns and beams. Retrofitted specimens reached the testing machine's 12 maximum axial load of 686 kN (70,000 kgf) with only minor cracking between 245–324 kN 13 (25,000–33,000 kgf), confirming concrete-steel compatibility and increases in stiffness and axial 14 capacity. Given the limited number of numerical models and laboratory specimens, the findings 15 were integrated in a descriptive way to show the consistency between the ETABS simulations 16 and the composite behavior observed in the tests. These results position W8×31 profiles as 17 a feasible, constructible option for seismic risk reduction in self-built contexts and provide a 18 technical bridge toward guidelines, on-site protocols, and community training aligned with the 19 Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) for safe, resilient, and inclusive housing.

Keywords: Construction Innovation, structural safety, Sustainable urban development, seismic engineering, InfrastructureVulnerability, Structural reinforcement, Self-built houses

Received: 23 Sep 2025; Accepted: 17 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Medrano-Sánchez and Fabian. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Emilio José Medrano-Sánchez, emilio.medranos@epg.usil.pe

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.