ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Conserv. Sci.
Sec. Human-Wildlife Interactions
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcosc.2025.1630140
Attitudes, norms, and beliefs of pastoralists toward cheetahs in the Horn of Africa
Provisionally accepted- 1New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, United States
- 2Colorado State University, FORT COLLINS, United States
- 3Zoological Society of London, London, United Kingdom
- 4Africa Range-Wide Cheetah Conservation Initiative, London, United Kingdom
- 5Hirola Conservation Program, Garissa, Kenya
- 6Africa Range-Wide Cheetah Conservation Initiative, Arusha, Tanzania
- 7Torrid Analytics, Nairobi, Kenya
- 8SRS Environmental Protection and Rural Land Administration, Jigjiga, Ethiopia
- 9Jigjiga University, Jigjiga, Ethiopia
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Free-ranging African cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) inhabit only 13% of their former range. A subspecies of particular conservation concern is the Northeastern African cheetah (A. j. soemmeringii), which has a tentative estimate of 500 mature individuals in the wild in the Horn of Africa. Human-cheetah interactions are common in this region, and anthropogenic drivers of cheetah loss include habitat loss, poaching, and the illegal trafficking of live cubs for the international wildlife trade. In this study we explore the human dimensions of human-cheetah interactions and the implications for cheetah conservation in the Horn of Africa. We conducted 222 social science surveys with pastoralists in the Somali Regional State of Ethiopia and Northeastern Kenya on levels of conflict with cheetahs, social norms toward killing and live capture of cheetah cubs, and attitudes toward cheetahs. We found high levels of livestock depredation, with more than 60% of respondents reporting a cheetah attack in the last year. More than 80% of survey respondents felt it was acceptable to kill a cheetah if it attacked livestock and that killing cheetahs was common in their area. About 30% of respondents reported it was acceptable to capture a live cheetah cub and that live capture occurred in their area. Both killing cheetahs and live capture of cubs were reported as motivated, in part, as a retaliatory response against cheetahs for livestock depredation. About 90% of respondents wanted to see the number of cheetahs decrease, and an ordinal logit regression showed that attitudes toward cheetahs were correlated with emotions, risk perceptions, beliefs about the efficacy of non-lethal mitigation, perceptions of benefits from cheetahs, and alternative income sources. The results from our study suggest that there is a critical need to co-develop cheetah coexistence strategies in the region that focus on reducing costs and increasing benefits of living with cheetahs; couple improvements in rangeland management with enhanced livelihood sustainability; and strengthen law enforcement.
Keywords: Acinonyx jubatus, Carnivore, Ethiopia, illegal wildlife trade, Kenya, poaching, trafficking
Received: 16 May 2025; Accepted: 23 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Jones, Evangelista, Durant, Young, Tesfai, Ali, Tricorache, Mitchell, Maule, Abdilahi, Edin, Edwin, Hussein, Mohamed and Musse. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Kelly W Jones, jones.kelly.west@gmail.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.