REVIEW article
Front. Conserv. Sci.
Sec. Plant Conservation
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcosc.2025.1656995
This article is part of the Research TopicGlobal Conservation of Vulnerable, Threatened and Endangered SeagrassView all articles
Updated extinction risk of seagrass species in the Tropical Atlantic Bioregion
Provisionally accepted- 1Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica
- 2Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- 3Universidade do Algarve, Faro, Portugal
- 4Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, St. Petersburg, United States
- 5Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Maputo, Mozambique
- 6Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- 7University of South Florida, Tampa, United States
- 8National Autonomous University of Mexico, México City, Mexico
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Seagrasses can form vast meadows in coastal areas and provide valuable ecosystem services. Despite their importance, seagrasses are threatened, and their spatial extent and ecological condition have declined worldwide. Globally, there are six seagrass bioregions based on ocean basin and species distribution. The Tropical Atlantic Bioregion encompasses seagrasses in the warm waters off the Atlantic American continent, the eastern Pacific and the west coast of Africa. Here, the extinction risk of the species was determined through the Categories and Criteria of the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. The extinction risk for the 15 native seagrass species in the bioregion was assessed and summarized as an update to the previous IUCN effort, conducted 15 years ago. The updated regional assessments were based on expert opinion and compilation of revised data on species´ distribution, population status and trend. Of the 15 native species, nine were endemic to the bioregion; thus, the regional assessment was also a global one. Two other species were typical for the region but also occurred beyond bioregional boundaries (Halodule beaudettei and H. wrightii). The remaining species were either distributed circumglobally (2 species), or consisted of peripheral populations of species characteristic of neighboring bioregions (2 species). The detailed information of 15 assessments have been made freely accessible in an open repository. Nine species maintained their previous risk of extinction status, while one species (Thalassia testudinum) changed from the Least Concern to the Near Threatened category. Downgrading of the status of T. testudinum is worrying, as this is the dominant climax species in the wider Caribbean. Its replacement by less resistant and smaller but faster growing species, such as Syringodium filiforme and H. wrightii (both classified as Least Concern), could compromise the ecosystem services of seagrasses in bioregion. An additional two species had been recently introduced, and are also briefly covered. The assessments included past and present taxonomical uncertainties of various assessed species. Issues concerning the current boundaries of the bioregions themselves were also encountered. To address this and better capture future and ongoing range expansion associated with climate change, we propose overlapping transitional boundaries with neighboring seagrass bioregions.
Keywords: marine angiosperms1, IUCN Red List of Threatened Species2, bioregional extinction assessment3, Halodule4, Halophila5, Ruppia6, Syringodium7, Thalassia8
Received: 30 Jun 2025; Accepted: 23 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Samper-Villarreal, Creed, Frade, Furman, Bandeira, El-Hacen, Peralta, Serrao and Van Tussenbroek. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Jimena Samper-Villarreal, jimena.sampervillarreal@ucr.ac.cr
Brigitta Ine Van Tussenbroek, vantuss@cmarl.unam.mx
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.