SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Conserv. Sci.
Sec. Conservation Social Sciences
Evolution of Fisheries, Aquaculture, and Crocodile Farming Governance in Zimbabwe within the Southern African Policy Context
Provisionally accepted- 1Chinhoyi University of Technology, Chinhoyi, Zimbabwe
- 2University of Zimbabwe Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Harare, Zimbabwe
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Capture fisheries, crocodile ranching and aquaculture provide vital food resources for enhanced food security and nutrition and sustain livelihoods in Southern Africa. Conflicting policies, regulations and institutional overlaps affect the operation and management of capture fisheries, crocodile ranching and aquaculture threatening their sustainability. This scoping review examined the evolution of fisheries, aquaculture and crocodile farming governance from 1890-2021 in Zimbabwe within the Southern African policy context. The aim was (i) to identify the legal and policy frameworks for capture fisheries, crocodile farming and aquaculture firms in Southern Africa and Zimbabwe, (ii) to explore the evolution and gaps in the legislation and policies for capture fisheries, crocodile farming and aquaculture firms in Southern Africa and Zimbabwe and (iii) highlight the strengths and future dimensions for developing prudent management policies for fisheries, crocodile ranching and aquaculture. Five concatenated evolutionary phases i.e soft conservation period (1866–1890), establishment period (1891-1938), consolidation fisheries and crocodile conservation period (1938–1961), quintessential conservation period (1962–1978) and conservation progression period (1980–2021) punctuated by persistent neglect of aquaculture and crocodile ranching, institutional overlaps and prominent influence of affluent recreational angling societies on fisheries policy development were identified for Zimbabwe. Within Southern Africa, evolution of fisheries and aquaculture policies has been more rapid for countries with coastal (marine) and inland freshwater resources such as Namibia, Cape Verde, Comoros Islands, Seychelles, Madagascar, Mauritius, South Africa, and Tanzania. Armed conflicts slowed (or are slowing) down the evolutionary pace of fisheries and aquaculture policies in Angola, Mozambique and the Democratic Republic of Congo. Aquaculture is still a fledgling industry thus, development of the relevant consolidated aquaculture and fisheries governing policies is still in its infancy across Southern Africa. This necessitates for standalone, harmonized aquaculture and fisheries policies. Zimbabwe like all Southern African Development Community (SADC) member states needs to align its fisheries and aquaculture policies with the SADC Fisheries Sector Policy as guided by the Policy Framework and Reform Strategy for Fisheries and Aquaculture in Africa in order to diversify and enhance sustainable fishing dependent livelihoods.
Keywords: fisheries governance, SADC countries, wildlife Acts, catchment dynamics, Livelihood sustainability, Zimbabwe
Received: 24 Sep 2025; Accepted: 24 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Utete and Mabika. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Beaven Utete, beavenu@gmail.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
