Andrew R. Davis
Sally Joan Watson- 1School of Science and Environmental Futures Research Centre, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
- 2Earth Sciences New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand
- 3Institute of Marine Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Editorial on the Research Topic
Impacts of anchor scour, vessel moorings and associated infrastructure on marine habitats
There has been growing awareness and interest in the potential impacts of vessel anchoring and mooring on benthic environments and the biota they support (Broad et al., 2020). This Research Topic in Frontiers in Conservation Science sought to bring the issues associated with anchoring and mooring to a wider audience, increase awareness and encourage further research. We hoped to fill some important knowledge gaps in this field and ultimately move to real world solutions.
Changing awareness
Almost a decade ago, Davis and co-workers (Davis et al., 2016) lamented the lack of shipping industry recognition of the environmental impacts of commonplace anchoring practices. The environmental code of practice developed by the International Chamber of Shipping, failed to mention anchoring and it potential impacts (ICS, 2008). It is now pleasing to see that the latest ‘Biodiversity’ report from Loyd’s Register (LR, 2025), an independent training and advisory body for the maritime industry, includes a section on anchoring impacts, making reference to the scientific literature and briefly lists a number of potential solutions. Importantly, the LR report was launched at the UN’s 2025 Oceans Conference in Nice, France and was subsequently publicised on several Maritime Industry websites. Curbing ship anchoring for environmental reasons still remains focussed on reduction in fossil fuels (e.g., Andersson and Ivehammar, 2017; Poulsen and Sampson, 2019) possibly related to global carbon-reduction incentive schemes and future net-zero goals adopted by the International Maritime Organisation (https://www.imo.org/en/mediacentre/hottopics/pages/faqs-the-imo-net-zero-framework.aspx). So, although awareness of anchoring and its impacts has increased, unfortunately some recent scientific contributions have failed to recognise the threat posed to benthic environments from anchoring activities (e.g., Jägerbrand et al., 2019; Agarwala and Saengsupavanich, 2023).
Filling knowledge gaps
This special topic contains a series of firsts. These include assessments of anchoring by large vessels in regions or habitats that have not yet received attention. The article examining the impacts of anchoring cruise vessels on Antarctic and subantarctic benthic environments highlighted disturbing levels of damage in these sensitive high latitude environments (Mulrennan et al.). It proved particularly topical with subsequent coverage in the mainstream media and prompted a response form the International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators (IAATO - https://iaato.org/safeguarding-antarctica-iaato-responds-research-anchoring-impacts-southern-ocean). Other articles in this Research Topic reveal wholesale changes in assemblages as a result of anchor scour. These include within unvegetated deep (30–60 m) sediment environments (Davis et al.) and among reef-associated temperate zone fishes (Broad et al.). These studies confirm that outcomes of anchoring can be complex and difficult to predict.
It is worth emphasising that some important work on anchoring impacts by large vessels in other geographic regions (including the Adriatic, Baltic, Mediterranean and Canadian waters) has appeared recently outside of this Research Topic (Pitacco et al., 2023; Hannah et al., 2024; Diaz-Mendoza et al., 2025; Jimenez et al., 2025). We anticipate that the article on determining an accessible and remote sensing method of obtaining the anchoring impacts in this Research Topic will encourage further research in other regions (Small and Oxenford). These authors provide a cost-effective means of applying AIS (ship positional) data to better interpret the spatial patterns of anchoring and the movements of vessels. This spatial information on anchorages can be critical to the effective management of anchoring (Davis et al., 2022).
Important knowledge gaps remain. Chief among these is refining the spatial scale of anchoring globally (Watson et al., 2022) and better understanding the evolution and persistence of anchor tracks on the benthos (Schulze et al., 2025). There is a need to better integrate the biological impacts with the geomorphological changes wrought by anchors and chains on the benthos. The impact of ship anchoring on sediment resuspension and resettling along with shorter-term water column changes (e.g., elevated turbidity) also warrants further investigation and is largely undocumented in the scientific literature. These secondary disturbances, as they have been called, are given consideration in this Research Topic (Griffin et al.). Currently, rates of recovery from anchoring in any habitat remains largely unknown. In addition, light and noise pollution while vessels are at anchor or steaming at slow speed remains virtually unexplored, even though preliminary research suggests correlations between changes in megafauna behaviour and the presence of anchored vessels (Carome et al., 2022; 2023; 2024).
Seeking real world outcomes
It is our hope that this Research Topic has moved the field forward. In this Research Topic, Broad et al. conclude with a series of recommendations to reduce or even eliminate anchoring footprints. Currently local regulations determine the anchoring practices at any given location, but to be effective international regulations need to be developed. These are important considerations given the predicted fourfold increase in maritime trade and associated port congestion by 2050 (Hanson and Nicholls, 2020), increasing anthropogenic stress on the ocean and the response of biota to multiple stressors. If the promise of the Blue Economy is to be realised, it is critical that scientists, the shipping Industry and natural resource managers engage for better outcomes.
Author contributions
AD: Conceptualization, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Investigation. SW: Conceptualization, Investigation, Project administration, Writing – review & editing.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the time and effort contributed by the editors and reviewers of this Research Topic. ARD would like to thank the Global Challenges Program at the University of Wollongong, Australia. This program supported his anchoring research from its inception. SJW was supported by the Aotearoa New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment under the Endeavour Smart Ideas Project C01X2309 - Redesigning anchoring practices for a more sustainable shipping industry.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Agarwala N. and Saengsupavanich C. (2023). Oceanic environmental impact in seaports. Oceans 4, 360–380. doi: 10.3390/oceans4040025
Andersson P. and Ivehammar P. (2017). Green approaches at sea–The benefits of adjusting speed instead of anchoring. Transportation Res. Part D: Transport Environ. 51, 240–249. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2017.01.010
Broad A., Rees M. J., and Davis A. R. (2020). Anchor and chain scour as disturbance agents in benthic environments: trends in the literature and charting a course to more sustainable boating and shipping. Mar. Poll. Bull. 161, 111683. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111683
Carome W., Rayment W., Slooten E., Bowman M. H., and Dawson S. M. (2023). Vessel traffic influences distribution of Aotearoa New Zealand’s endemic dolphin (Cephalorhynchus hectori). Mar. Mam Sci. 39, 626–647. doi: 10.1111/mms.12995
Carome W., Rayment W., Slooten E., Bowman M. H., Martinez E., and Dawson S. M. (2024). Snapshots in time: quantifying dynamics of coastal vessel traffic in a dolphin hotspot. New Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 58, 465–488. doi: 10.1080/00288330.2023.2261872
Carome W., Slooten E., Rayment W., Webster T., Wickman L., Brough T., et al. (2022). A long-term shift in the summer distribution of Hector’s dolphins is correlated with an increase in cruise ship tourism. Aquat. Conserv: Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 32, 1660–1674. doi: 10.1002/aqc.3881
Davis A. R., Broad A., Gullett W., Reveley J., Steele C., and Schofield C. (2016). Anchors away? The impacts of anchor scour by ocean-going vessels and potential response options. Mar. Policy 73, 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.07.021
Davis A. R., Broad A., Small M., Oxenford H. A., Morris B., and Ingleton T. C. (2022). Mapping of benthic ecosystems: key to improving the management and sustainability of anchoring practices for ocean-going vessels. Continental Shelf Res. 247, 104834. doi: 10.1016/j.csr.2022.104834
Diaz-Mendoza G. A., Kraemer K., von Rönn G. A., Heinrich C., Schwarzer K., Reimers H. C., et al. (2025). Hotspots of human impact on the seafloor in the Southwestern Baltic Sea. Continental Shelf Res. 285, 105362. doi: 10.1016/j.csr.2024.105362
Hannah L. C., Francis F. T., and Murray C. C. (2024). The effects of commercial vessel anchorages span ecological, cultural, and socio-economic endpoints. Mar. Poll. Bull. 208, 117039. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.117039
Hanson S. E. and Nicholls R. J. (2020). Demand for ports to 2050: Climate policy, growing trade and the impacts of sea-level rise. Earth’s Future 8, e2020EF001543. doi: 10.1029/2020EF001543
ICS (2008). Shipping and the environment: a code of practice, Fourth Edition (London: International Chamber of Shipping), 31.
Jägerbrand A. K., Brutemark A., Sveden J. B., and Gren M. (2019). A review on the environmental impacts of shipping on aquatic and nearshore ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 695, 133637. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133637
Jimenez C., Papatheodoulou M., Resaikos V., and Petrou A. (2025). Wholesale destruction inside a marine protected area: anchoring impacts on sciaphilic communities and coralligenous concretions in the eastern mediterranean. Water 17, 2092. doi: 10.3390/w17142092
LR (2025). Biodiversity Report: Understanding science to engineer shipping solutions (England: Lloyds Register Maritime Biodiversity Programme), 41–42.
Pitacco V., Mavrič B., and Lipej L. (2023). A preliminary study of soft bottom benthic communities in an area affected by intense maritime traffic (Slovenian Sea, Northern Adriatic). Mar. Poll. Bull. 188, 114672. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.114672
Poulsen R. T. and Sampson H. (2019). ‘Swinging on the anchor’: The difficulties in achieving greenhouse gas abatement in shipping via virtual arrival. Transportation Res. Part D: Transport Environ. 73, 230–244. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2019.07.007
Schulze I., Schönke M., Feldens P., and Papenmeier S. (2025). Temporal evolution of anchor tracks on a silty seafloor (Eckernförde Bay/Baltic Sea). Front. Remote Sens. 6. doi: 10.3389/frsen.2025.1576192
Keywords: anchor damage, human impacts, conservation decision making, global trade, SDG14 life below water, solutions
Citation: Davis AR and Watson SJ (2025) Editorial: Impacts of anchor scour, vessel moorings and associated infrastructure on marine habitats. Front. Conserv. Sci. 6:1732153. doi: 10.3389/fcosc.2025.1732153
Received: 25 October 2025; Accepted: 29 October 2025;
Published: 06 November 2025.
Edited and reviewed by:
Mario Diaz, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), SpainCopyright © 2025 Davis and Watson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Andrew R. Davis, YWRhdmlzQHVvdy5lZHUuYXU=