BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article
Front. Hematol.
Sec. Blood Cancer
Portuguese real-world experience with ibrutinib for the treatment of relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma
Provisionally accepted- 1Hematology Department, Instituto Portugues de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil EPE, Lisbon, Portugal
- 2Clinical Hematology Department, Unidade Local de Saude de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- 3Hematology Department, Unidade Local de Saude de Sao Joao, Porto, Portugal
- 4Hematology Department, Unidade Local de Saude da Arrabida, Setúbal Municipality, Portugal
- 5Hematology Department, Unidade Local de Saude de Santo Antonio EPE, Porto, Portugal
- 6Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Instituto Portugues de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil EPE, Porto, Portugal
- 7Universidade do Porto Instituto de Ciencias Biomedicas Abel Salazar, Porto, Portugal
- 8Hematology Department, Unidade Local de Saude de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal
- 9Hematology Department, Unidade Local de Saude Sao Jose, Lisbon, Portugal
- 10Hematology Department, Unidade Local de Saude de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
- 11Hemato-Oncology Unit, Fundacao Champalimaud, Lisbon, Portugal
- 12Universidade Nova de Lisboa Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal
- 13Hemato-Oncology Department, Unidade Local de Saude de Almada-Seixal, Almada, Portugal
- 14Hemato-Oncology Unit, Hospital CUF Descobertas, Lisbon, Portugal
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Mantle cell lymphoma is usually characterized by an aggressive and recurrent course. Clinical trials and real-world series have demonstrated clinical benefits with the use of ibrutinib as a second-line treatment, compared to later relapses. Objective: To evaluate the Portuguese experience with the use of ibrutinib in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma since its approval in the country. Methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort of patients with mantle cell lymphoma who received ibrutinib between 2015 and 2020 was studied. Results: Ninety-five patients treated at 11 hospitals were included. At the ibrutinib starting date, 51% of patients had high-risk simplified mantle cell lymphoma international prognostic index, 9% had central nervous system involvement, and 21% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2. The median treatment duration was 10 (<1-75) months. The overall response rate was 66%, including 36% with complete responses. After 18 months of follow-up, seventy-two patients (76%) had discontinued ibrutinib, mainly due to progressive disease (61%) and toxicity (21%). At the last follow-up, 24% of patients were still on ibrutinib, and 60% had died, mostly (65%) due to lymphoma progression. Conclusions: In this real-world series, the safety of ibrutinib is similar to the results described in clinical trials. However, new strategies are needed for the treatment of acquired resistance to ibrutinib.
Keywords: Ibrutinib, Mantle cell lymphoma, relapse/refractory disease, Real-world, Portuguese
Received: 09 Sep 2025; Accepted: 27 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Fernandes, Costa e Sousa, Santos, Almeida, Roque, Pinto, Monteiro, Neves, Ramos, Coutinho, Mousinho, Fernandes, Badior, João, Leocádio, Tomé, Carrolo, Dias, da Silva and Fernandes. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Catarina  Fernandes, csofia.dmf@gmail.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
