Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Hum. Neurosci.

Sec. Brain Health and Clinical Neuroscience

Volume 19 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1552895

This article is part of the Research TopicMechanisms and disorders in sensorimotor integration and synchronization: Pattern formation, self-organization, dynamical disorders, resilience, and recoveryView all 3 articles

Pattern Formation, Ruptures, and Repairs in Treatments of Personality Disorders: An Idiographic Case Series Study

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Psychology, Aalborg, Denmark, Aalborg, Denmark
  • 2Research Unit, Aalborg Psychiatric Hospital, Northern Region, Denmark, Aalborg, Denmark
  • 3Mental Health Services West, Region Zealand, Slagelse, Denmark., Slagelse, Denmark
  • 4Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom
  • 5CEMHS – Centre for Excellence in Mental Health Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • 6Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University of eCampus, Novedrate, Lombardy, Italy
  • 7Department of Culture and Language, Faculty of Humanities, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
  • 8Danish Institute for Advanced Study, Faculty of Business and Social Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Region of Southern Denmark, Denmark
  • 9College of International Studies, Southwest University, Chongqing, China
  • 10Section of Personality Psychiatry, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  • 11Nydalen District Center, Division Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Norway, Oslo, Norway
  • 1210. Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Institute of Synergetics and Psychotherapy Research, Ignaz Harrer Str. 79, 5020 Salzburg, Austria, Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
  • 1316. Psychology, Department of Communication and Psychology, Aalborg University, Denmark, Aalborg, Denmark

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Any human communication is based on verbal, emotional, and movement patterns that weave within and between conversation partners. Personality disorders (PD), characterized by emotional dysregulation, attachment instability, and impulsivity, present disruptions in the integration of these coordination dynamics influencing alliance formation and outcome. Therapists, regardless of their clinical expertise, often find themselves grappling with the complexities of tailoring PD treatment. The alliance is often challenged by significant tension or breakdowns increasing risk of impaired progress. Thus, this multi-method comparative case series study investigated how four therapists tailored their treatment with four PD patients in a mentalization-based treatment program to identify patterns of interaction that might facilitate or hinder the therapeutic process during sessions characterized by severe disruption.The Symptom Checklist (SCL-92) was applied to identify two successful and two unsuccessful PD treatments. The Rupture Resolution Rating System-Revised was used to detect sessions with rupture frequency peaks in each treatment case. Therapist adherence and competence were assessed with the Mentalization-Based Therapy Adherence and Competence Scale. Heart rate patterns were calculated with cross-recurrence quantification analysis to examine synchronization. An interpretative phenomenological analysis examined the therapeutic process, in addition to quantitative measures.In sessions with increased rupture frequency, therapists had difficulties managing ruptures and struggled to tailor their treatments no matter the treatment outcome and therapist experience level. Therapists showed high contribution to confrontation ruptures, low adherence and competence ratings, decreased ability to stimulate a mentalizing environment, and inattentiveness to the patients' mental and emotional states during rupture management. Interestingly, more positive heart rate recurrence correlations were identified in sessions from successful treatments showing different regulatory patterns in rupture peak sessions from good versus poor outcome treatments.Our results make a significant contribution to psychotherapy research by offering a multifaceted perspective on how dynamical alliance processes might foster or hinder the therapeutic process. The clinical implications of low adherence, therapist strategic competence, and increased HR synchronization between therapist and patient in rupture intense sessions are discussed.

Keywords: interpersonal physiology, process research, recurrence quantification analysis, adherence, Alliance, Rupture, repair, personality disorder

Received: 07 Jan 2025; Accepted: 27 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Høgenhaug, Kongerslev, Orsucci, Zimatore, Steffensen, Ekberg, Campanella, Schiepek and Kjaersdam Telléus. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Stine Steen Høgenhaug, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Psychology, Aalborg, Denmark, Aalborg, Denmark

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.