ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Hum. Neurosci.
Sec. Motor Neuroscience
Volume 19 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1587118
This article is part of the Research TopicMethods in motor neuroscienceView all 6 articles
Effects of Sliding Techniques on Lower Limb Biomechanics and Muscle Synergy During Curling Delivery: A Focus on Joint Kinetics and Muscle Coordination
Provisionally accepted- 1Harbin Sport University, Harbin, China
- 2Heilongjiang Research Institute of Sports Science, Harbin, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Different curling delivery techniques, such as full-foot contact (FFC), outward-toed fullfoot contact (OTFFC), and toe contact (TC), impose distinct biomechanical demands and neuromuscular control challenges on the sliding leg. However, current research on the specific differences among these techniques in terms of multi-joint coordination and muscle synergy is limited. This study investigates the effects of these three propulsion techniques on the lower limb joint mechanics and muscle synergy patterns of the left sliding leg during curling delivery in curling athletes.Methods: Kinematic and electromyographic (EMG) data from eight key sliding leg muscles (rectus femoris, vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, semimembranosus, biceps femoris, gastrocnemius, lateral gastrocnemius, tibialis anterior) were recorded from 16 male professional curlers using 3D motion capture and wireless EMG during FFC, OTFFC, and TC techniques. Muscle synergies were extracted via non-negative matrix factorization (NMF), and joint mechanics via inverse dynamics. Differences were assessed using repeated measures ANOVA.The TC significantly altered hip and knee joint mechanics, notably increasing peak hip abduction, knee flexion, and associated torques (all p<0.01), while also showing greater subtalar joint abduction than OTFFC (p=0.001). Conversely, OTFFC elicited greater knee adduction angles and ankle dorsiflexion torques (p<0.01); FFC compromised subtalar joint stability (p<0.01). Hip and knee adduction torques were generally highest in OTFFC and lowest in TC (p<0.001). TC demonstrated substantially higher knee flexion/extension torques (32-41%, p≤0.002). Three distinct muscle synergy patterns were identified: Synergy 1 (hip-knee dominant) showed increased rectus femoris contribution in TC, while Synergy 2 (ankle-foot dominant) exhibited earlier gastrocnemius activation in OTFFC (p<0.05 for synergy findings).In conclusion, the TC predominantly relies on the coordinated activation of muscle groups responsible for hip abduction, knee flexion/extension, and external rotation. Conversely, the OTFFC emphasizes the coordinated effort of muscle groups surrounding the ankle and subtalar joints. In terms of injury prevention, the concentrated use of the hip and knee joints in the TC technique suggests that targeted strengthening and stability training for these areas should be implemented to prevent potential overuse injuries.
Keywords: Curling delivery, Sliding methods, Curling athletes, Lower limb joints, muscle coordination
Received: 04 Mar 2025; Accepted: 19 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Hua, Zhu, Bi, Zhu and Diao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Yulong Zhu, Harbin Sport University, Harbin, China
Gengchao Bi, Harbin Sport University, Harbin, China
Ming Zhu, Heilongjiang Research Institute of Sports Science, Harbin, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.