ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Hum. Neurosci.
Sec. Cognitive Neuroscience
Volume 19 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1606051
Brain Substrates of Visual Scene Memory: A Lesion-Behavior Mapping Study
Provisionally accepted
- 1Psychology, Reichman University, Herzliya, Israel
- 2Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv, Israel
- 3Loewenstein Rehabilitation Medical Center, Raanana, Israel
- 4Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, California, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The brain network supporting visual-scene memory includes ventral (what) and dorsal (where, how) visual processing streams, and hubs within the medial temporal cortex, plus frontal, temporal, and parietal regions comprising the core-recollection memory system. However, the exact relationship between these regions and the capacity to memorize different types of visual-scene elements remains debated. Functional neuroimaging studies point to dissociable as well as common network components supporting perception and memory of different aspects of visual information. In the current neuropsychological study, we assess impact of stroke lesion topography on recall of identity, location, and action of event participants, as assessed by the WMS-III Family Pictures subtest.Methods: 93 first-event stroke patients (54 and 39 right-and left-hemisphere damaged, respectively; RHD, LHD) in the sub-acute phase performed the Family Pictures task. Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM) analysis identified brain lesions implicated in memory deficits for the composite score and separately for each scene element: characters' identity, the action they performed, and location of occurrence.Results: Behavioral analysis revealed significant impairment in identity, location, and action memory among right hemisphere damage (RHD) patients compared to matched healthy controls. Performance was significantly lower in delayed compared to immediate testing condition, and memory domains showed a hierarchy of scores: highest for identity, intermediate for location, and lowest for action.VLSM revealed a markedly different pattern of lesion effects in the two hemispheres. In the RH, network was dominated by large voxel clusters in middle and superior temporal and inferior parietal regions. In contradistinction, the LH network was dominated by large voxel clusters in temporooccipital and medial temporal lobe (MTL) regions. VLSM conjunction analysis disclosed further distinctions between anatomical regions subserving memory of character identity, action, and location.Discussion: Visual scene memory is supported by a bi-hemispheric network dominated in the LH by temporo-occipital/MTL structures and in the RH by temporo-parietal components of the core recollection network. The LH network regions were mostly implicated in a non-specific manner, whereas in the RH network more regions were implicated in memory for specific scene elements.
Keywords: Visual-Scene Memory, Recall, Stroke, lesion, Wechsler Memory Scale
Received: 04 Apr 2025; Accepted: 30 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Ben-Zvi Feldman, Soroker and Levy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Daniel A Levy, Psychology, Reichman University, Herzliya, 46150, Israel
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.