ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Hum. Neurosci., 30 September 2025

Sec. Cognitive Neuroscience

Volume 19 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2025.1626528

Auricular acupressure combined with auricular acupoint massage enhances cognitive function in night shift nurses: a P300 wave analysis

  • 1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Meizhou People’s Hospital, Meizhou, China

  • 2. Psychological Clinic of Meizhou People’s Hospital, Meizhou, China

  • 3. Department of Comprehensive Geriatric Medicine, The First People’s Hospital of Chenzhou City, Chenzhou, China

Abstract

Objectives:

Night-shift work is associated with cognitive impairments, but convenient, effective, and acceptable traditional Chinese medicine-based interventions remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of auricular acupressure combined with auricular acupoint massage on cognitive function in night-shift nurses, using P300 wave parameters from electroencephalography analysis as objective metrics.

Methods:

Eighty nurses (40 days-shift, 40 night-shift) participated. The intervention included auricular acupressure and massage targeting six points, performed daily for 4 weeks. Cognitive function was assessed using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). P300 amplitude and latency were measured.

Results:

Night-shift nurses had significantly higher ISI scores and lower MoCA attention, memory, and total scores compared to day-shift nurses (all p < 0.05). Before the intervention, After FDR correction for multiple comparisons, P300 amplitude was significantly lower at the T4 electrode site (q = 0.020) in the night-shift group. P300 latency remained significantly prolonged at sites Fz (q = 0.020), F3 (q < 0.001), F4 (q = 0.035), and T5 (q = 0.033). Post-intervention, the night-shift group demonstrated significant increases in P300 amplitude at F3, F4, T3, T4, T5, and T6 (all q < 0.05) and significant reductions in P300 latency at Fz, F4, F7, T5, and T6 (all q < 0.05). Notably, several sites with affected P300 amplitude and latency before the intervention showed significant improvement following intervention.

Conclusion:

Auricular acupressure and massage significantly improved cognitive function in night-shift nurses, evidenced by enhanced P300 parameters. This non-invasive, cost-effective intervention shows promise for alleviating cognitive impairments from shift work.

1 Introduction

Nurses working rotating shifts play a critical role in ensuring continuous patient care in healthcare settings. However, the demands of alternating between day and night shifts often disrupt their circadian rhythms, leading to significant cognitive impairments (; ). These impairments typically manifest as reduced alertness, memory difficulties, and slower decision-making speeds (), which not only jeopardize nurses’ physical and mental wellbeing but also increase the likelihood of nursing errors. Such errors can compromise patient safety and the quality of care (). As a result, identifying effective strategies to mitigate cognitive dysfunction in night shift nurses has become an essential focus of both clinical practice and academic research. Night-shift work adversely affects not only nurses but also other healthcare professionals. Reported consequences include increased cardiovascular risk (), circadian rhythm disruption (), dementia risk (), and broader impacts on health and quality of life (). Our study focuses on nurses as a representative group within this broader context.

Current studies on cognitive function in night shift nurses primarily rely on self-report questionnaires or standardized scales (; ). While these methods provide some insight, they are limited by their subjective nature and relatively low sensitivity. For example, employed multiple instruments, including the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Digit Span Test (DST), and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) (). However, such assessments have inherent limitations: they depend on participants’ subjective reporting, which can be influenced by personal perception bias, and many scales use integer-based scoring, restricting their ability to detect subtle or early cognitive changes. To address these limitations, various interventions have been explored to improve sleep and cognitive function in night-shift nurses.

Currently, interventions for sleep and cognitive impairments in night-shift nurses include behavioral measures such as adjusting night-shift schedules, taking daytime naps, and sleep health education, as well as pharmacological treatments targeting sleep-wake regulation (). Behavioral strategies are often difficult to implement effectively and show limited, slow-acting benefits, while pharmacological treatments carry risks of addiction, side effects, and potential drug interactions. These limitations highlight the need for convenient, safe, and effective alternatives such as auricular acupressure and auricular acupoint massage.

Auricular therapy, a key practice in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), involves stimulating specific points on the ear through techniques such as acupuncture, acupressure, and electrostimulation. This therapy has demonstrated notable efficacy in managing a variety of health issues, particularly in pain relief (), emotional regulation (), and the treatment of sleep disorders (). The therapeutic mechanisms are believed to involve modulation of neurotransmitter secretion and the balance of the endocrine system, thereby enhancing the body’s self-healing abilities (; ). Due to its simplicity, minimal side effects, and growing body of evidence supporting its effectiveness, auricular therapy has become an integral part of complementary TCM treatments and is increasingly recognized by modern medical research ().

Event-related potentials (ERP) represent a non-invasive neurophysiological tool used to objectively evaluate cognitive functions by analyzing the brain’s electrical responses to specific stimuli or events. ERP measurements are especially useful in examining changes in attention, memory, and decision-making processes (). Among ERP components, the amplitude and latency of the P300 wave are commonly used indicators for assessing cognitive function. P300 latency reflects the speed of stimulus evaluation, increases with task difficulty, and can be elicited by auditory, visual, or somatosensory stimuli (). P300 amplitude reflects attentional resource allocation (). Auditory P300 has been used to assess cognitive status in Parkinson’s disease (), and both parameters correlate with arithmetic performance (). Alterations in P300 therefore provide objective markers of cognitive decline, including in night-shift workers (). These metrics have been extensively applied in research on aging, neurodegenerative diseases, and psychiatric disorders (; ; ; ). Furthermore, alterations in P300 amplitude and latency have been employed to evaluate the effects of external interventions on cognitive performance, providing objective data to support clinical outcomes ().

This study aims to investigate the effects of auricular acupressure combined with auricular acupoint massage on cognitive function in night-shift nurses, using P300 latency and amplitude as electrophysiological markers. Day-shift and night-shift nurses underwent baseline assessments of cognitive function and sleep quality using standardized neuropsychological scales (MMSE, MoCA, ISI) and P300 evaluation. Only the night-shift group received the four-week auricular intervention, after which EEG recordings were repeated to assess post-intervention changes. This design allowed comparison between day- and night-shift nurses and evaluation of the potential of auricular therapy to improve cognitive impairments associated with night-shift work.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Study design and subjects

This randomized controlled trial was conducted at Meizhou People’s Hospital from January 2023 to September 2023, enrolling a total of 80 nurses: 40 night-shift nurses and 40 day-shift nurses. Participants were randomly assigned to the experimental or control group using a modulo-based randomization approach. This study was conducted as a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Neither the participants nor the practitioners performing the auricular acupressure and massage procedures were aware of the participants’ group assignments. Group allocation was conducted and maintained confidentially by an independent third party (a master’s-level graduate student). The assessors responsible for administering the MoCA, MMSE, and EEG/P300 measurements were also blinded to group assignments to minimize potential experimenter expectancy bias.

The experimental group received auricular acupressure combined with auricular acupoint massage. The control group did not receive any therapeutic intervention but was provided with standardized sleep health education after electroencephalography data collection. The education covered general recommendations, including maintaining a quiet and comfortable sleep environment, avoiding alcohol before bedtime, not overeating or consuming hard-to-digest foods at night, refraining from caffeine or strong tea within 4 h before sleep, engaging in regular physical activity, and avoiding strenuous exercise within 3 h before bedtime.

Day-shift nurses worked regular daytime hours (8 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. or 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m., 2:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.) in outpatient clinics without night-shift duties. Night-shift nurses worked rotational schedules in inpatient wards, covering shifts from late afternoon to midnight (3:30 p.m. to 11 p.m.) and/or midnight to early morning (11 p.m. to 8 a.m.).

Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) nurses actively working in frontline clinical roles (outpatient clinics for day-shift nurses and inpatient wards for night-shift nurses); (2) aged 20–55 years; (3) normal hearing and either normal or corrected-to-normal vision; (4) no history of significant hepatic or renal dysfunction, brain trauma, epilepsy, substance or alcohol abuse, dementia, depression, anxiety, or other psychiatric disorders; (5) a minimum educational level of junior high school; and (6) provision of informed consent. Exclusion criteria were: (1) severe physical disabilities or organic brain conditions requiring electroconvulsive therapy and (2) a history of night-shift work for participants in the day-shift group. Participants were excluded if they failed to cooperate or could not complete the study procedures effectively.

Participants were assigned to groups using a systematic randomization method. Each participant was numbered from 1 to 80, and random numbers were drawn sequentially from a random number table. These numbers were divided by the total number of groups, and the remainders determined group assignments. If the random number was evenly divisible by the group count, the remainder defaulted to the highest group number.

The study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Meizhou People’s Hospital (No. 2022-C-61) and registered in the Medical Research Registration Information System. All participants were provided with detailed information about the study’s objectives, methods, procedures, potential risks, and anticipated benefits. The non-invasive nature and safety of the research were emphasized, and written informed consent was obtained prior to participation.

2.2 Baseline psychological and cognitive assessments

After obtaining written informed consent, all participants completed baseline psychological and cognitive assessments prior to the start of the experiment. The assessments included self-administered and clinician-evaluated scales to measure insomnia severity and cognitive function.

The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) () was used to evaluate the severity of insomnia over the past 2 weeks. This scale comprises seven items with a total score ranging from 0 to 28. Higher scores indicate more severe insomnia, with clinical severity thresholds defined as follows: 0–4 (no clinically significant insomnia), 5–14 (mild insomnia), 15–21 (moderate insomnia), and 22–28 (severe insomnia).

Cognitive function was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) () and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) ().

2.2.1 MMSE

This scale evaluates orientation, memory, reading, writing, attention, calculation, recall, naming, and repetition, with a maximum score of 30 points. Correct answers were scored as 1, while incorrect or unanswered items were scored as 0. Given that all participants had at least a junior high school education, a score of 27–30 was considered normal cognitive function, while scores below 22 indicated cognitive impairment.

2.2.2 MoCA

This assessment evaluates multiple cognitive domains, including visuospatial and executive functions, naming, attention, language, abstraction, delayed recall, and orientation. The total score ranges from 0 to 30, with a score of ≥ 26 indicating normal cognitive function and < 26 suggesting impairment.

The MMSE and MoCA assessments were conducted by two intermediate-level psychotherapists with extensive clinical experience to ensure consistency and accuracy. The results of these evaluations were used as baseline data for subsequent analyses.

2.3 Auricular acupressure therapy and auricular acupoint massage

In auricular acupressure therapy and auricular acupoint massage, specific auricular points are carefully selected to optimize treatment accuracy and therapeutic efficacy. The primary points used include the Heart, Shenmen, Subcortex, Sympathetic, Endocrine, and Occiput points, each with precise anatomical locations (Figure 1). The Heart point is located in the central depression of the cavum concha, while the Shenmen point is situated in the triangular fossa, slightly above the bifurcation of the superior and inferior antihelix crus. The Subcortex point lies on the inner side of the tragus, corresponding to its fourth zone, and the Sympathetic point is positioned at the junction of the terminal end of the inferior antihelix crus and the helix. The Endocrine point is found at the bottom of the cavum concha, approximately 0.5 cm within the intertragic notch, and the Occiput point is located on the outer upper edge of the tragus at the midpoint of its lower border. Depending on the patient’s condition, additional auricular points may be selected by a Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) physician following the principles outlined in the “Differential Diagnosis of Traditional Chinese Medicine Symptoms” ().

FIGURE 1

Before initiating auricular acupressure therapy, the patient was seated upright to ensure proper posture for the procedure. A thorough examination of the ear skin was conducted to identify any abnormalities, such as damage, swelling, or vascular engorgement. The auricular points and instruments were disinfected using 75% alcohol, which was allowed to evaporate completely before proceeding. Gradual pressure was then applied to the auricular points with appropriate force to identify areas of maximum tenderness, which were subsequently marked with a probe for accurate placement. During the procedure, the auricular point sticking with Vaccaria seeds (manufactured by Wuxi Jiajian Medical Instrument Co., Ltd., Wuxi, China) was aligned with the marked locations. Vertical pressure was applied using the pads of the thumb and index finger, progressively increasing from light to firm until the patient experienced sensations such as soreness, numbness, distension, or pain—responses indicative of the “Deqi” phenomenon. Each auricular point was pressed for 30–60 s, and the process was repeated four times daily at 7:00 a.m., 12:00 p.m., 5:00 p.m., and 10:00 p.m. The Vaccaria seeds were replaced every 3 days throughout the 4 weeks treatment course. To avoid potential damage to the ear skin, lateral or back-and-forth rubbing was avoided during the procedure. Patients were instructed to keep the ear area dry and to prevent dislodgement of the adhesive. In cases where detachment occurred, the adhesive was promptly reapplied to maintain therapeutic efficacy.

Auricular acupoint massage was administered immediately following each auricular acupressure session, constituting an integrated part of the same treatment episode. This combined protocol was performed four times daily throughout the 4 weeks intervention period. Auricular acupoint massage was conducted following a standardized protocol consisting of five techniques: full auricular front-and-back massage, finger-rolling helix massage, ear apex pulling, earlobe kneading, and comprehensive auricular acupoint massage. For the full auricular front-and-back massage, the practitioner first rubbed their palms together until warm, then sequentially pressed and massaged the anterior (front) and posterior (back) surfaces of the auricle until the entire ear became warm. The finger-rolling helix massage involved using the thumb and index finger to roll along the helix, starting from the base, moving upward to the apex, and then forward to the helix root, repeating this motion. The ear apex pulling technique required grasping the upper part of the auricle and gently pulling it upward until the area became warm and hyperemic. Earlobe kneading was performed by pinching the earlobe with the thumb and index finger, pulling downward and outward while simultaneously rubbing the area until hyperemia was achieved. Lastly, the comprehensive auricular acupoint massage targeted specific points starting from the triangular fossa. The massage was performed with the index finger, applying gentle pressure to the cymba concha and cavum concha in sequence, with 20–30 repetitions for each point.

Each session ensured the ear was sufficiently warmed, with noticeable hyperemia and a tingling sensation, to achieve the desired therapeutic effect. To enhance treatment adherence, researchers used a WeChat-based assistant to send reminders and record participants’ compliance with the prescribed techniques. For individuals who did not respond promptly, personalized follow-ups were conducted to ensure the accuracy and safety of the procedures.

2.4 Electroencephalography and P300 measures

Cognitive function was assessed using P300 event-related potentials recorded with a medical ERP device (Neuracle Tech. Co., Ltd., Changzhou, China). Electrodes were placed following the international 10–20 system, with A1 and A2 positioned on the left and right mastoids, the reference electrode (CPz), and the grounding electrode (AFz). Vertical and horizontal electrooculogram were recorded simultaneously. The device operated with a bandpass filter range of 0.01–100 Hz and a sampling rate of 1,000 Hz, with electrode impedance maintained below 5 kΩ during data acquisition.

P300 data were acquired from a full set of 20 electrode sites according to the international 10–20 system: Fp1, Fp2, Fz, F3, F4, F7, F8, Cz, C3, C4, T3, T4, Pz, P3, P4, T5, T6, Oz, O1, and O2. An auditory oddball paradigm was employed, featuring a 90 dB auditory stimulus. Target stimuli occurred with a probability of 20%, and non-target stimuli with a probability of 80%. Each target stimulus response was averaged across 1,000 trials. Participants were instructed to remain awake, relaxed, and attentive with their eyes closed while counting target stimuli via a button press. The recording session lasted approximately 20 min, and all EEG data were stored for offline analysis.

The continuous EEG data were preprocessed offline using the instrument’s built-in analysis suite. Data were filtered with a 0.01–100 Hz bandpass and a 50 Hz notch filter. Ocular and muscular artifacts were addressed using Independent Component Analysis (ICA). The EEG was then segmented into epochs from −200 to 1,000 ms relative to stimulus onset. A baseline correction was applied using the −200 ms to 0 ms pre-stimulus period. Epochs containing artifacts with amplitudes exceeding ± 100 μV were automatically excluded from further analysis.

Both P300 latency (ms) and P300 amplitude (μV) were measured from stable event-related potentials. For each participant, the P300 component was identified at each electrode as the most positive peak within a 250–500 ms post-stimulus latency window. P300 amplitude was automatically extracted as the peak amplitude relative to the pre-stimulus baseline. P300 latency was defined as the time from stimulus onset to the occurrence of this peak amplitude.

Participants adhered to strict preparation guidelines before testing. They were required to abstain from alcohol, caffeine, and central nervous system depressants or stimulants for at least 2 weeks. Night-shift and day-shift nurses arrived at the hospital the day before testing and were required to sleep onsite for at least eight hours to standardize conditions. Baseline information, including demographic data and sleep assessments (e.g., ISI), was collected prior to the P300 recordings.

2.5 Data collection

Demographic information, psychological and cognitive assessments, and electroencephalography data were collected. Baseline characteristics, including age, sex, education years, and pre-intervention electroencephalography measurements, were recorded for all 80 participants. Post-intervention electroencephalography data, however, were obtained exclusively from the 40 participants working night shifts.

2.6 Statistical analysis

The normality of all continuous variables was assessed, and only the age variable met the assumption of normality. Accordingly, age was reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD), while other continuous variables were presented as medians with interquartile ranges (IQR; 25th and 75th percentiles). Comparisons of continuous variables between shift groups were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test, except for age, which was analyzed using Student’s independent t-test. The categorical variable, sex, was expressed as counts and percentages and compared using the Chi-square test. Within the night-shift group, pre- and post-intervention electroencephalography results were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

EEG data were analyzed across a comprehensive array of 20 electrode sites according to the international 10–20 system. Given that multiple pairwise comparisons were performed for each P300 parameter (amplitude and latency) at these sites, the risk of Type I errors was substantially increased. To account for this multiplicity, the False Discovery Rate (FDR) correction method was applied to the p-values derived from the Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (for within-group, pre-post comparisons) and the Mann-Whitney U tests (for between-group comparisons). The FDR correction was implemented using the p.adjust function in R software, version 4.4.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). A corrected q-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all EEG-based comparisons. Bar charts were utilized to visualize electroencephalography outcomes in the figures. All statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 25 (IBM Corporation, Somers, NY). The initial p-values for EEG comparisons were generated in SPSS, then exported to R specifically for the application of the FDR correction. For all tests other than the EEG comparisons, a two-tailed p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3 Results

3.1 Participant’s baseline characteristics

A total of 80 participants were included in this study, consisting of 10 males (12.50%) and 70 females (87.50%). The average age was 34.54 ± 8.07 years, with a median of 10 years of education. Forty participants worked the day shift, while 40 worked the night shift. The baseline characteristics of the participants are summarized in Table 1. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, sex, education level, MMSE, or several MoCA subdomains (all p > 0.05). However, the night-shift participants had higher ISI scores and lower scores on MoCA attention, memory, and total scores (all p < 0.05).

TABLE 1

ParametersDay shift (n = 40)Night shift (n = 40)All (n = 80)P
Age34.88 ± 7.7634.20 ± 8.4634.54 ± 8.070.711
Sex0.176
Male3 (7.50%)7 (17.50%)10 (12.50%)
Female37 (92.50%)33 (82.50%)70 (87.50%)
Education year14 (13, 15)15 (13, 16)15 (13, 15.75)0.275
ISI score12 (8.25, 14.75)18 (16, 23.75)15.50 (11, 20)< 0.001
MMSE28 (27, 29)28 (27, 29)28 (27, 29)0.263
MoCA
Visuospatial and executive functions5 (4, 5)5 (4, 5)5 (4, 5)0.811
Naming3 (3, 3)3 (3, 3)3 (3, 3)0.317
Attention5 (5, 6)5 (4, 5)5 (5, 5)< 0.001
Language3 (3, 3)3 (3, 3)3 (3, 3)1.000
Abstraction2 (2, 2)2 (2, 2)2 (2, 2)0.317
Memory5 (4, 5)4 (4, 5)4 (4, 5)< 0.01
Orientation6 (5, 6)6 (5, 6)6 (5, 6)0.650
Total28 (27.25, 29)27 (27, 28)28 (27, 28)< 0.001

Participant’s baseline characteristics by shift groups.

3.2 Pre-intervention electroencephalography results

Before the intervention, P300 wave parameters, including amplitude and latency across various brain regions, were measured for all participants. Table 2 summarizes the pre-intervention electroencephalography results for both the day-shift and night-shift groups, providing P300 amplitude and latency data.

TABLE 2

ParametersDay shift (n = 40)Night shift (n = 40)All (n = 80)PAdjusted q (FDR)
P300 amplitude
Fp10.40 (−1.48, 1.98)1.95 (−0.78, 3.78)1.05 (−0.80, 2.95)0.0570.285
Fp21.50 (−1.15, 2.75)1.55 (−0.20, 3.10)1.50 (−0.40, 3.08)0.6370.749
Fz1.50 (0.08, 3.90)0.70 (0.20, 1.30)0.80 (0.20, 1.93)0.0470.285
F31.95 (0.48, 4.63)1.30 (0.23, 2.08)1.40 (0.30, 2.58)0.0370.285
F41.65 (0.43, 4.40)1.05 (0.60, 1.68)1.25 (0.53, 2.88)0.1170.346
F72.15 (−0.18, 5.18)2.25 (1.45, 4.65)2.20 (−0.03, 4.78)0.7400.779
F82.70 (0.48, 5.50)2.35 (0.65, 4.38)2.65 (0.63, 4.80)0.5160.688
Cz1.45 (0.13, 5.43)1.55 (1.30, 2.30)1.55 (0.90, 2.95)0.5730.716
C32.35 (0.33, 4.80)2.00 (1.23, 2.90)2.05 (0.73, 3.18)0.7330.778
C41.40 (0.33, 4.28)1.65 (1.03, 2.38)1.60 (0.83, 3.00)0.8850.885
T32.95 (2.23, 4.58)3.10 (0.73, 4.13)3.10 (2.10, 4.28)0.2310.462
T43.45 (2.63, 5.05)2.50 (2.03, 3.18)2.95 (2.23, 3.90)0.0010.020
Pz2.00 (0.55, 5.00)1.70 (0.33, 3.60)1.80 (0.43, 4.18)0.3680.583
P32.40 (1.10, 4.98)1.85 (0.70, 3.38)2.20 (0.70, 4.58)0.2060.458
P42.85 (0.73, 5.00)2.50 (0.60, 3.98)2.60 (0.63, 4.28)0.4130.590
T53.20 (2.80, 5.30)3.25 (1.23, 5.30)3.20 (2.03, 5.30)0.1760.440
T63.20 (2.43, 4.50)3.00 (1.55, 4.28)3.10 (1.83, 4.48)0.1020.346
Oz2.30 (−0.03, 4.85)3.50 (2.53, 5.18)3.25 (1.33, 5.08)0.1210.346
O12.85 (−0.18, 4.73)3.20 (1.43, 4.98)3.05 (0.60, 4.88)0.3790.583
O22.55 (0.38, 5.13)2.95 (2.00, 4.98)2.75 (1.30, 4.98)0.3050.555
P300 latency
Fp1336.50 (327.50, 350.50)345.00 (322.25, 372.50)340.00 (324.25, 359.25)0.1870.197
Fp2330.00 (313.50, 355.25)342.00 (322.50, 366.00)337.00 (316.25, 358.75)0.1030.129
Fz331.50 (311.00, 349.75)351.00 (331.25, 385.25)343.00 (320.00, 363.75)0.0020.020
F3313.00 (301.00, 351.00)341.50 (326.25, 382.00)335.50 (312.00, 368.00)< 0.001< 0.001
F4328.00 (305.00, 347.50)351.00 (322.25, 378.75)340.00 (312.50, 367.25)0.0070.035
F7328.00 (306.25, 350.50)342.00 (319.75, 384.75)338.50 (311.25, 360.25)0.0310.088
F8342.50 (312.00, 369.50)345.00 (311.25, 381.75)342.50 (312.00, 380.00)0.4700.470
Cz326.00 (302.25, 358.25)352.50 (311.25, 369.25)341.00 (307.00, 361.00)0.0820.129
C3340.00 (320.00, 356.25)356.00 (325.00, 386.25)345.50 (321.25, 379.50)0.0910.129
C4342.50 (328.25, 356.00)364.50 (311.25, 388.00)351.00 (326.50, 376.75)0.0770.129
T3336.50 (310.25, 359.25)353.00 (326.50, 380.75)342.50 (316.25, 376.00)0.0300.088
T4341.50 (319.50, 362.50)364.00 (320.25, 388.00)347.00 (320.25, 378.00)0.0590.129
Pz342.00 (308.50, 374.25)370.00 (312.50, 412.00)351.00 (310.25, 386.25)0.0650.129
P3345.50 (330.25, 364.00)370.50 (327.25, 384.00)352.00 (330.25, 378.75)0.0350.088
P4342.50 (320.00, 364.00)370.50 (312.00, 387.75)349.00 (319.00, 383.00)0.1410.166
T5343.00 (313.25, 359.50)373.00 (329.00, 400.00)349.50 (317.00, 379.75)0.0050.033
T6340.50 (313.00, 354.50)368.50 (327.00, 388.00)349.00 (317.00, 380.00)0.0180.072
Oz348.00 (338.50, 365.75)371.00 (336.00, 389.25)350.00 (338.00, 376.00)0.1030.129
O1346.00 (339.25, 359.75)365.00 (321.75, 376.00)348.00 (336.75, 370.00)0.1860.197
O2348.00 (330.00, 376.50)370.50 (337.75, 387.00)358.00 (333.50, 380.00)0.0950.129

Participant’s pre-intervention electroencephalography results.

After FDR correction for multiple comparisons across the 20 electrode sites, the results were as follows:

For P300 amplitude, participants in the night-shift group exhibited significantly lower value only at the T4 electrode site (q = 0.020) compared to the day-shift group.

In terms of P300 latency, the night-shift group demonstrated significantly prolonged latency at the Fz (q = 0.020), F3 (q < 0.001), F4 (q = 0.035), and T5 (q = 0.033) electrode sites.

These findings are visually represented in Figure 2, where statistically significant electrode sites are marked with asterisks. Figure 3 illustrates the overall distribution of P300 amplitudes and latencies across all participants.

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 3

3.3 Comparisons between pre- and post-intervention results in the night-shift group

In the night-shift group, post-intervention P300 wave parameters were collected and compared with pre-intervention data. Table 3 summarizes the electroencephalographic results, including P300 amplitude and latency for the night-shift group.

TABLE 3

ParametersNight shift (n = 40)Change (post minus pre)PAdjusted q (FDR)
PrePost
P300 amplitude
Fp11.95 (−0.78, 4.25)2.10 (−0.85, 4.38)0.15 (0.00, 0.45)0.0300.075
Fp21.55 (−0.20, 3.10)1.45 (−0.10, 3.28)0.05 (−0.05, 0.10)0.1220.203
Fz0.70 (0.20, 1.30)0.70 (0.03, 1.38)0.10 (0.00, 0.20)0.0280.075
F31.30 (0.23, 2.08)1.35 (0.23, 2.20)0.15 (0.05, 0.25)0.0010.005
F41.05 (0.60, 1.68)1.15 (0.63, 2.10)0.15 (0.05, 0.25)0.0010.005
F72.25 (1.45, 4.65)2.40 (1.50, 4.78)0.05 (0.00, 0.10)0.0820.164
F82.35 (0.65, 4.38)2.50 (0.68, 4.50)0.05 (0.00, 0.15)0.0770.164
Cz1.55 (1.30, 2.30)1.60 (1.13, 2.28)0.25 (−0.05, 0.10)0.4850.544
C32.00 (1.23, 2.90)2.20 (1.15, 2.95)0.05 (0.00, 0.10)0.1640.252
C41.65 (1.03, 2.38)1.75 (0.93, 2.28)0.05 (−0.05, 0.10)0.4900.544
T33.10 (0.73, 4.13)3.20 (1.08, 4.28)0.15 (0.05, 0.25)0.0010.005
T42.50 (2.03, 3.18)2.60 (2.23, 3.30)0.15 (0.05, 0.25)0.0020.008
Pz1.70 (0.33, 3.60)1.90 (0.23, 3.45)0.00 (−0.05, 0.10)0.4060.539
P31.85 (0.70, 3.38)1.70 (0.83, 3.35)0.00 (−0.10, 0.10)0.8150.815
P42.50 (0.60, 3.98)2.60 (0.63, 4.05)0.00 (−0.05, 0.10)0.6090.641
T53.25 (1.23, 5.30)3.50 (1.50, 5.28)0.20 (0.10, 0.25)< 0.0010.005
T63.00 (1.55, 4.28)3.00 (1.60, 4.48)0.15 (0.05, 0.25)0.0040.013
Oz3.50 (2.53, 5.18)3.45 (2.58, 5.20)0.00 (−0.05, 0.10)0.4310.538
O13.20 (1.43, 4.98)3.15 (1.35, 5.10)0.05 (0.00, 0.10)0.1000.182
O22.95 (2.00, 4.98)2.90 (2.20, 5.03)0.05 (−0.05, 0.10)0.3740.534
P300 latency
Fp1345.00 (322.25, 372.50)341.50 (318.50, 369.50)−3.00 (−6.50, 0.00)0.0650.155
Fp2342.00 (322.50, 366.00)340.50 (319.25, 358.75)−2.50 (−5.50, 0.50)0.1160.211
Fz351.00 (331.25, 385.25)347.50 (320.00, 370.50)−7.50 (−13.00, −3.00)0.0040.020
F3341.50 (326.25, 382.00)342.50 (316.25, 391.75)−5.00 (−9.50, −0.50)0.0280.080
F4351.00 (322.25, 378.75)343.50 (319.00, 367.00)−8.50 (−14.00, −4.00)0.0010.010
F7342.00 (319.75, 384.75)336.50 (315.00, 365.75)−8.00 (−12.50, −4.00)0.0010.010
F8345.00 (311.25, 381.75)345.50 (310.75, 380.75)−2.00 (−5.50, 2.00)0.2730.364
Cz352.50 (311.25, 369.25)341.50 (310.25, 371.75)−1.00 (−4.00, 2.50)0.5760.606
C3356.00 (325.00, 386.25)355.50 (328.50, 385.00)1.00 (−2.00, 4.00)0.5420.602
C4364.50 (311.25, 388.00)366.50 (316.50, 384.00)−1.50 (−5.00, 1.50)0.2730.364
T3353.00 (326.5, 380.75)351.00 (330.25, 382.75)−6.00 (−10.50, −1.00)0.0190.063
T4364.00 (320.25, 388.00)361.50 (317.50, 392.50)−4.25 (−9.00, 1.00)0.0700.156
Pz370.00 (312.5, 412.00)372.50 (313.25, 404.00)−2.00 (−5.00, 1.50)0.2310.364
P3370.5 (327.25, 384.00)373.50 (331.25, 385.00)−1.00 (−4.00, 2.50)0.4890.585
P4370.50 (312.00, 387.75)368.50 (315.25, 382.5)−1.00 (−5.00, 2.00)0.4970.585
T5373.00 (329.00, 400.00)365.50 (319.50, 391.75)−7.50 (−11.50, −2.50)0.0020.013
T6368.50 (327.00, 388.00)361.00 (320.00, 388.00)−6.00 (−10.00, −1.50)0.0050.020
Oz371.00 (336.00, 389.25)361.50 (329.25, 385.75)−2.00 (−5.50, 1.50)0.2580.364
O1365.00 (321.75, 376.00)362.00 (325.25, 378.50)−0.50 (−4.50, 3.50)0.7750.775
O2370.50 (337.75, 387.00)363.50 (328.50, 384.75)−2.50 (−6.00, 0.50)0.1040.208

The pre- and post-intervention electroencephalography results in night-shift group.

Following FDR correction, for P300 amplitude, significant increases were observed at the F3 (q = 0.005), F4 (q = 0.005), T3 (q = 0.005), T4 (q = 0.008), T5 (q = 0.005), and T6 (q = 0.013) electrode sites.

Conversely, for P300 latency, post-intervention values were significantly lower at Fz (q = 0.020), F4 (q = 0.010), F7 (q = 0.010), T5 (q = 0.013), and T6 (q = 0.020) electrode sites. Overall, the intervention led to a notable increase in P300 amplitude and a decrease in P300 latency, with significant changes occurring predominantly in the frontal and temporal regions. These findings are also illustrated in Figure 4.

FIGURE 4

4 Discussion

This study investigated the impact of night-shift work on participants’ psychological and cognitive functions, incorporating P300 measurements to provide an objective perspective on the sleep quality and cognitive performance of night-shift workers. As shown in Table 1, results from the ISI and MoCA evaluations revealed significant declines in sleep quality and cognitive ability in the night-shift group. Specifically, the ISI scores of the night-shift group were significantly higher than those of the day-shift group (P < 0.001), indicating more severe insomnia among night-shift workers (). This disparity suggests that night-shift work may lead to sleep deprivation or reduced sleep quality, consequently impairing cognitive function. Regarding cognitive performance, the night-shift group scored significantly lower on the MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assessment) across multiple dimensions, particularly in attention (P < 0.001) and memory (P < 0.01). Additionally, the total MoCA scores of the night-shift group were notably lower than those of the day-shift group (P < 0.001). These findings indicate that night-shift work significantly impairs cognitive functions, particularly executive function and memory ().

To further validate the objectivity of the subjective evaluations, ERP P300 waveform measurements were utilized to provide a more detailed analysis of participants’ neurocognitive function. It is important to note that all reported significant findings for EEG comparisons are based on FDR correction for multiple comparisons across the 20 electrode sites. This rigorous statistical approach ensures that our reported results are robust and not due to chance findings, thereby strengthening the validity of our conclusions regarding the intervention’s effects on specific neural circuits. The P300 results revealed significantly reduced amplitudes in the night-shift group at the T4 electrode site (q = 0.020). Although uncorrected p-values were significant at Fz and F3, these differences did not survive FDR correction for multiple comparisons (q = 0.285 for both). The reduced amplitude at T4 reflects diminished cognitive processing efficiency in this temporal region (). A decrease in P300 amplitude is generally associated with reduced attentional resources or impaired cognitive performance, suggesting diminished neural resource allocation and cognitive engagement during tasks in the night-shift group (). Furthermore, after FDR correction, prolonged P300 latencies remained significant in the night-shift group at the Fz (q = 0.020), F3 (q < 0.001), F4 (q = 0.035), and T5 (q = 0.033) electrode sites. These delays indicate slower neural processing speeds, particularly in the frontal and temporal regions. Increased P300 latency reflects prolonged information processing time, leading to slower cognitive response speeds and delayed reactions to stimuli (). These P300 findings provide biological support for the subjective assessments and shed light on potential neural mechanisms underlying the observed cognitive deficits.

These results are consistent with a body of existing literature on P300 as a marker of cognitive function. Previous studies have documented reduced P300 amplitudes and prolonged latencies in night-shift workers, a pattern consistent with impaired attention, memory, and slowed cognitive processing (; ; ). Night-shift work disrupts circadian rhythms (), which in turn predisposes individuals to sleep and biological-rhythm disturbances (), thereby impeding cognitive recovery and increasing the risk of long-term cognitive decline including dementia (). Our results align with and extend these reports by precisely identifying the specific frontal and temporal brain regions most affected by shift work through multi-electrode analysis, further solidifying the utility of P300 as an objective electrophysiological marker of shift-work-related cognitive impairment.

These results suggest that long-term night-shift work significantly affects higher-order cognitive functions, particularly in the frontal and temporal regions of the brain. Chronic sleep deprivation and irregular work schedules may disrupt circadian rhythms, impairing the normal functioning of the nervous, immune, and endocrine systems, ultimately resulting in decreased cognitive resource allocation and slower neural responses (; ; ). This study demonstrated poorer performance in multiple psychological and cognitive assessment dimensions among night-shift participants, particularly in reaction time and memory, which could further reduce learning and work efficiency. The findings are consistent with existing literature highlighting the long-term adverse effects of night-shift work on brain health, underscoring the generalizability and reliability of this study’s conclusions.

Current management strategies for shift-work-related cognitive decline primarily include pharmacological interventions (e.g., melatonin, modafinil) and behavioral modifications (e.g., sleep hygiene education, controlled light exposure) (). While beneficial, these approaches can be limited by potential side effects, contraindications, or challenges in long-term adherence. It is within this context that non-invasive, complementary approaches like auricular therapy require further exploration.

Given the significant cognitive impairments observed in night-shift workers, auricular therapy was implemented as a potential intervention to mitigate these effects (). After auricular acupressure and auricular acupoint massage treatment, the night-shift group showed significant increases in P300 amplitude at the F3 (q = 0.005), F4 (q = 0.005), T3 (q = 0.005), T4 (q = 0.008), T5 (q = 0.005), and T6 (q = 0.013) electrode sites after FDR correction. Notably, the T4 site, which exhibited a significantly reduced amplitude before the intervention (q = 0.020), showed marked improvement in amplitude (q = 0.008). Additionally, sites F3 and F4, which showed prolonged latency pre-intervention, showed significant shortening in latency post-intervention. Similarly, post-treatment P300 latency values were significantly shortened at Fz (q = 0.020), F4 (q = 0.010), F7 (q = 0.010), T5 (q = 0.013), and T6 (q = 0.020). These results indicate that auricular acupressure and auricular acupoint massage effectively enhanced P300 amplitude and shortened latency, potentially alleviating neurocognitive deficits in multiple brain regions. Importantly, our finding that this combined intervention increased P300 amplitude and shortened latency suggests that the electrophysiological deficits associated with night-shift work are at least partially reversible with a timely, non-pharmacological intervention. Similar findings have been reported in previous studies, which demonstrated that acupuncture improved P300 amplitude and shortened latency more effectively than Western medicine or cognitive rehabilitation training alone, highlighting its potential for cognitive function rehabilitation (). Notably, the intervention appears to boost brain activity in the frontal and temporal lobes, potentially improving higher cognitive functions such as reaction time and processing speed.

Given its low cost, non-invasive nature, and ease of implementation, the auricular therapy protocol used in this study may represent a feasible and attractive complementary or alternative strategy to mitigate cognitive deficits in night-shift populations. These promising results warrant further evaluation in larger, controlled trials.

This study has several limitations that should be acknowledged. First, the sample size was relatively small, with only 80 participants, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Second, the study was conducted at a single healthcare institution, potentially introducing institutional biases that may not represent broader populations. Third, the absence of a placebo or sham control group limits the ability to distinguish the specific therapeutic effects of auricular acupressure and massage from potential placebo or expectancy effects. Fourth, although our study identified electrode-specific changes in P300 amplitude and latency, we were unable to provide topographical scalp maps because the ERP recording equipment was on a trial basis and was retrieved by the manufacturer after the study, preventing further data reprocessing and visualization. Finally, the study’s short follow-up period does not allow for the assessment of long-term efficacy and sustainability of the intervention. Future research should confirm these findings through larger, multicenter trials, incorporate sham auricular interventions to establish specificity, apply advanced ERP mapping to elucidate spatial patterns, and evaluate the long-term effects of auricular therapy. This study highlights the significant impact of night-shift work on cognitive function, particularly in areas related to reaction time and processing speed, as evidenced by impaired P300 amplitude and latency in key brain regions. Through the application of auricular acupressure therapy combined with auricular acupoint massage, we observed marked improvements in P300 parameters, suggesting enhanced cognitive processing and response efficiency in night-shift nurses. These findings underscore the potential of this intervention as a simple, safe, and cost-effective strategy for mitigating cognitive impairments associated with shift work. This study provides an objective tool for assessing cognitive function and introduces a promising intervention to improve the cognitive performance and well-being of night-shift nurses, potentially enhancing patient care and advancing evidence-based practices in occupational health.

Statements

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in this article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Meizhou People’s Hospital (No. 2022-C-61). The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

XL: Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. ZZ: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. LX: Formal analysis, Methodology, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. XZ: Data curation, Software, Writing – review & editing. HY: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. FL: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. RC: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. QZ: Validation, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the 2022 Meizhou Social Development Science and Technology Project (No. 2022B19), and the 2022 Scientific Research Cultivation Project of Meizhou People’s Hospital (No. PY-C2022034).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Summary

Keywords

night-shift nurses, cognitive function, auricular acupressure, auricular acupoint massage, P300 wave

Citation

Li X, Zhang Z, Xiao L, Zhang X, Yao H, Li F, Chen R and Zhong Q (2025) Auricular acupressure combined with auricular acupoint massage enhances cognitive function in night shift nurses: a P300 wave analysis. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 19:1626528. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1626528

Received

11 May 2025

Accepted

15 September 2025

Published

30 September 2025

Volume

19 - 2025

Edited by

Mattia Galigani, University of Turin, Italy

Reviewed by

Denisa Adina Zamfira, University of Turin, Italy

Marcella Romeo, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Italy

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Zhun Zhang,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics