Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Hum. Neurosci.

Sec. Motor Neuroscience

Volume 19 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1666804

This article is part of the Research TopicHow cognitive functions interact with the motor system to shape motor behaviorView all 8 articles

Negative expectations and measurable movement mechanics: a scoping review of the nocebo effect on motor performance

Provisionally accepted
  • 1University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France
  • 2Universite de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The nocebo effect, where negative responses can occur as a result of negative expectations, has gained increasing attention in motor control research, with growing evidence highlighting its impact on both athletic and everyday movements. However, the specific methodologies used to induce nocebo effects on motor outcomes remain unexplored. This scoping review aimed to address three key questions: (1) What experimental protocols have been developed and used to elicit nocebo effects in motor performance in healthy individuals? (2) How are these effects assessed and measured? (3) What are the observed effects on motor outcomes? A scoping review was conducted following the PRISMA framework, searching PubMed, EBSCO, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar from inception to March 2025. Eighteen studies were included. Verbal instruction was the most common induction method (94.4 %), often combined with conditioning or visual cues. Motor tasks assessed gross skills, such as sprinting and cycling), with limited attention given to fine motor control. Outcomes were more frequently centered on performance measures (e.g., strength, endurance), with less emphasis on movement quality (e.g., coordination). Nocebo effects were observed in half of the studies impairing motor performance, including reduced force production, diminished endurance, disrupted postural stability and slower movement speed. The findings highlight methodological diversity in induction protocols and measurement methods. Future research should expand participant diversity, investigate fine motor tasks, and further explore the interplay between induction methods and motor outcomes.

Keywords: Nocebo mechanism, expectation, movement kinematics, conditioning, anticipation ofpain, behavioral adaptation, motor control

Received: 15 Jul 2025; Accepted: 02 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Burgos-Tirado, Leonard, Hakimi, Vancraeynest, Lelard and Cozette. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Maryne Cozette, University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.