CLINICAL TRIAL article
Front. Hum. Neurosci.
Sec. Motor Neuroscience
This article is part of the Research TopicNew horizons in stroke management: Volume IIView all 5 articles
Rehabilitation of patients in the subacute phase of stroke using the ReHand robotic system: a randomized controlled trial
Provisionally accepted- 1Karaganda Medical University, Karaganda, Kazakhstan
- 2Vilniaus universitetas, Vilnius, Lithuania
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Upper limb motor impairment after stroke is a major cause of limitations in daily activities and reduced quality of life. Although traditional rehabilitation is effective, it is often insufficiently intensive and lacks focus on fine motor activation. Portable soft exoskeletons offer a promising approach to intensify recovery. This trial aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the ReHand robotic system in subacute stroke rehabilitation. Methods: This Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) included 120 patients in the subacute period of stroke. Participants were stratified by age and motor deficit severity and randomized into the intervention group (robotic therapy + standard therapy) or control group (standard therapy only). The intervention was delivered 5 times per week over 8 weeks. The primary outcome was change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE); secondary outcomes included Barthel Index (BI), Functional Independence Measure (FIM), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), modified Wolf Motor Function Test (mWMFT), Frenchay Arm Test (FAT), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Statistical analysis was performed in Python (v3.11). Normality was assessed with the Shapiro– Wilk test; the Mann–Whitney test was used for intergroup comparisons; Pearson's χ² test with Yates' correction was used for categorical variables. Effect size was calculated using Cliff's delta; rank-ANCOVA was performed via the Quade method. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: The intervention group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in upper limb motor impairment compared to the control group, as reflected by larger gains in FMA-UE scores. Clinically meaningful improvements (≥5.25 points) were observed in 91.7% of patients in the intervention group versus 43.3% in the control group. All secondary outcomes also showed significant improvements in the intervention group (p < 0.001). No adverse events were reported in either group. Conclusions: When combined with standard therapy, the ReHand robotic system may enhance upper limb recovery after stroke and appears to be a safe and feasible adjunct to multidisciplinary rehabilitation programs.
Keywords: Stroke, Upper limb, Robotic therapy, Soft exoskeleton, Rehabilitation, neuroplasticity
Received: 22 Aug 2025; Accepted: 05 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Amirbekova, Kispayeva, Adomaviciene and Sorokina. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Tokzhan Kispayeva, kispayevatt@mail.ru
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
