CORRECTION article
Front. Hum. Neurosci.
Sec. Brain Imaging and Stimulation
This article is part of the Research TopicApplications of non-invasive brain stimulation in neurodevelopmental disordersView all 5 articles
Corrigendum: Modeling dyslexia in neurotypical adults by combining neuroimaging and neuromodulation techniques: a hypothesis paper
Provisionally accepted
- 1Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Humanities, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
- 2Department of Linguistics, Graduate School of Humanities, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Corrigendum on: Gallagher D, Huang Z and Ohta S (2025) Modeling dyslexia in neurotypical adults by combining neuroimaging and neuromodulation techniques: a hypothesis paper. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 19:1651332. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1651332 In the published article, there was an error in the legend for Figure 2 as published. The authors reported the wrong electrode combinations. The corrected legend appears below.Anodal simulation of HD-tDCS using a 4×1 ring electrode montage attempting to stimulate VWFA from the lowest available electrode positions. We used a central anode at T7, with cathodes at FT9, TP9, FC5, and CP5. SimNIBS software was used for the simulation (Thielscher et al., 2015). For ease of visualization, stimulation electrodes were overlaid on the original image. (A) HD-tDCS simulation, (B) HD-tDCS simulation with adjusted color scale to show field magnitudes exceeding the minimum effective dose (MED). Because the scalp is not depicted in the rendering, the electrodes may appear to be floating due to perspective distortion when projecting a 3D image onto a 2D plane. This distortion affects the perceived distance between the electrodes and the brain surface.The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated. In the published article, there was an error in the legend for Figure 3 as published. The authors reported the wrong electrode combinations. The corrected legend appears below.Simulation of tTIS on the VWFA, based on two pairs: FT7/F10 and TP7/P10. SimNIBS software was used for the simulation (Thielscher et al., 2015). (A) Individual tACS pairs used for tTIS, (B) Combined tTIS field, (C) Combined tTIS field with adjusted color scale to show field magnitudes exceeding the minimum effective dose (MED). Because the scalp is not depicted in the rendering, the electrodes may appear to be floating due to perspective distortion when projecting a 3D image onto a 2D plane. This distortion affects the perceived distance between the electrodes and the brain surface.
Keywords: Dyslexia, dyslexia subtypes, human models, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), neuropathological clustering, Neuromodulation, Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), transcranial temporal interference stimulation (tTIS)
Received: 26 Oct 2025; Accepted: 28 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Gallagher, Huang and Ohta. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Shinri Ohta, ohta@lit.kyushu-u.ac.jp
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.