Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Lang. Sci.

Sec. Psycholinguistics

This article is part of the Research TopicInsights in Psycholinguistics: 2025View all articles

Unreal Words, Real Competition: Mandarin Recognition Slows for Syllable-Matched Tonal Gaps

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Brooklyn College (CUNY), Brooklyn, United States
  • 2West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
  • 3University of Connecticut, Storrs, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Word recognition in tone languages like Mandarin is influenced not only by phonological structure but also by lexical tone. Prior research using auditory lexical decision tasks has shown that real monosyllables are generally processed more quickly and accurately than tonal gaps i.e., impossible syllable-tone combinations. However, these studies often did not control for syllable overlap between tonal gaps and real monosyllables, potentially underestimating lexical competition effects. The present study addressed this gap by contrasting real monosyllables, syllable-matched tonal gaps, and syllable-unmatched tonal gaps in a controlled auditory lexical decision task with 54 native Mandarin speakers. Results revealed that reaction times were significantly faster and accuracy higher for real monosyllables compared to both syllable-matched tonal gaps and syllable-unmatched tonal gaps. More importantly, syllable-matched tonal gaps elicited slower reaction times than syllable-unmatched tonal gaps, indicating increased lexical competition when tonal gaps share the same syllable as real monosyllables. These findings emphasize the critical role of phonological similarity and lexical competition in Mandarin word recognition. By controlling syllabic overlap, this study improves upon previous methodologies and offers a clearer assessment of auditory word processing in tone languages.

Keywords: Mandarin word recognition, auditory lexical decision, tonal gaps, non-wordprocessing, Reaction Time

Received: 26 Sep 2025; Accepted: 17 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Sharma, LI and Maggu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Akshay Maggu, akshay.maggu@uconn.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.