Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiomes

Sec. Environmental Microbiomes

Volume 4 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frmbi.2025.1608732

The EDEN ISS Mobile Test Facility microbiome changes by cleaning and continued use

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Institute of Aerospace Medicine, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Cologne, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
  • 2Research Unit for Microbiology, Belgian Nuclear Research Center (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium
  • 3Nuclear Medical Applications, Belgian Nuclear Research Center (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium
  • 4Institut Pascal, Clermont Auvergne INP, CNRS, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
  • 5Life Sciences Institute, School of Chemical Science, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland
  • 6Institute for Space Systems, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Bremen, Bremen, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Bio-regenerative life support systems (BLSS) utilizing plants and/or microorganisms to provide the crew of a spacecraft with food, clean water, breathable air and other amenities are likely to form key components of future long-distance spaceflight missions. Extensive testing and validation of such technologies are necessary before they can be implemented. EDEN ISS was a platform in Antarctica that tested various plant cultivation technologies for a BLSS. To ensure the continued operation of a BLSS, it is vital that plants remain healthy, which necessitates the monitoring of the plant production facility microbiome to ensure that pathogens are detected early and counter-measures can be engaged. Swab surface samples collected in the EDEN ISS Mobile Test Facility (MTF) during different campaigns were used to estimate the bioburden of the various surfaces via viable count. Isolates obtained from the cultivation of the surface samples were identified via partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Additionally, 16S amplicon sequencing was performed on DNA extracted directly from the swab-samples to characterize the microbiome. The results revealed that the bioburden of the different sampling positions was not significantly reduced by cleaning, indicating that the employed cleaning regime was unsuited in its current form to adequately lower the bioburden. Identification of the isolates as well as the full microbiome revealed mostly environmental genera. However, in both cases genera containing plant as well as human pathogens, like Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter, were identified, and accounted for up to 16.1 % of all reads for a sampling condition in the case of Pseudomonas. The two sets of sequencing data had little overlap, with Rhodococcus and Microbacterium being the only genera being shared between all sampling conditions and sequencing approaches, and emphasized different aspects of the MTF microbiome, highlighting the advantages of using a combined approach to obtain a more complete picture of the microbiome composition.

Keywords: Bioregenerative Life Support System (BLSS), greenhouse, surface microbiome, plantcultivation technologies, Antarctica, built environment

Received: 09 Apr 2025; Accepted: 12 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Gaiser, Beblo-Vranesevic, Van Houdt, Fahrion, Gillet De Chalonge, Bunchek, Zabel, Schubert and Rettberg. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Kristina Beblo-Vranesevic, Institute of Aerospace Medicine, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Cologne, 51147, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.