ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Musculoskelet. Disord.
Sec. Osteoporosis
Volume 3 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmscd.2025.1620506
Osteoporosis treatment gap and risk of refracture: a pilot retrospective study on a cohort of patients referred to a Fracture Liaison Service in Italy
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Rheumatology Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- 2Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Department of Mathematics, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- 3Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- 4Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- 5Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Rheumatology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The timely administration of anti-osteoporotic medications (AOM) to patients with fragility fractures (FF) reduces the imminent refracture risk. European studies found a wide osteoporosis treatment gap, but Italian cohort-based data are lacking.We aimed at assessing the entity of the osteoporosis treatment gap in an Italian cohort, i.e. the percentage of patients not treated within two months from the index FF and the time delay in AOM administration, and its impact on refracture risk. We retrospectively collected the clinical histories of 500 randomly selected osteoporotic patients with FFs referred to our Fracture Liaison Service. We identified those who had AOM prescribed within two months from the index FF (group "early treatment") and those who had not (group "untreated"). Refracture occurrence was retrospectively assessed in both groups, followed by a survival and risk analysis.Results: Forty-one patients were excluded for missing data. Out of 459 patients, 374 (81.5%) received AOM therapy more than two months after the index FF, with a median delay of 24 months (IQR 52) (range 3-312; mean 47 months). The log-rank test showed that group "untreated" was significantly more prone to refracture than "early treatment" (78% vs. 48%, respectively; p = 0.0001). Cox regression revealed a 44% lower probability of refracture in group "early treatment". Discussion: In this study, 81.5% of individuals had their first AOM prescription after a median time of 24 months after the index FF, resulting in higher refracture risk. Preventive strategies to reduce the osteoporosis treatment gap should be implemented.
Keywords: Osteoporosis, Treatment gap, fragility fracture, Fracture Liaison Service/FLS, Refracture risk, Italy, Europe, prevention
Received: 29 Apr 2025; Accepted: 04 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 DE MATTIA, MANCA, BOTTAI, ANTOGNETTI, MENCONI, MAFFI, MOSCA and MAZZANTINI. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: MAURIZIO MAZZANTINI, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Rheumatology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.