Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Musculoskelet. Disord.

Sec. Spine Conditions

Volume 3 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmscd.2025.1645555

This article is part of the Research TopicHighlights in Spine ConditionsView all 4 articles

Intradural spinal arachnoid cysts versus spinal arachnoid webs: a retrospective analysis of incidence, imaging findings and clinical presentation at a single institution

Provisionally accepted
Rourke  M StayRourke M Stay1*Blake  S CromieBlake S Cromie2Christopher  D RogersChristopher D Rogers3Douglas  W PahlDouglas W Pahl1
  • 1Hughston Clinic, Columbus, United States
  • 2TriStar Skyline Medical Center, Nashville, United States
  • 3Augusta University, Augusta, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Intradural spinal arachnoid cysts (SACs) and spinal arachnoid webs (SAWs) are rare extramedullary lesions in the spine. We aimed to assess the relative incidence of the two entities while also better assessing the similarities and differences in imaging appearance and clinical presentation.A retrospective analysis was performed of the incidence, imaging features, and clinical presentation of SACs and SAWs at a single institution from 2015 to 2021.RESULTS: There were 12 cases of SACs and 9 cases of SAWs. The incidence of cysts was .050% and the incidence of webs was .037%. The clinical presentation was similar in the two groups, with the most common signs and symptoms being back pain followed by leg pain. Other signs of myelopathy were common in both groups including absent or diminished reflexes, decreased sensation, and decreased strength. The locations of the cysts were: 1 cervical (8%), 6 thoracic (50%), 5 lumbar (42%). All of the cervical and thoracic cysts caused cord compression. All 9 webs caused focal cord compression (scalpel sign).CONCLUSION: SACs and SAWs are both rare lesions that we believe have a similar incidence, with cysts being only a little more common in our cohort. As they both often present with signs and symptoms of myelopathy, imaging findings are more useful in distinguishing between the two entities. The location of the cyst and the appearance of mass effect on the cord are helpful, as webs cause a focal compression, the scalpel sign, while cysts cause broader and smoother compression.

Keywords: Myelopathy, Cord compression, Back Pain, MRI, CT Myelogram, arachnoid web, Spinal arachnoid cyst

Received: 12 Jun 2025; Accepted: 15 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Stay, Cromie, Rogers and Pahl. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Rourke M Stay, Hughston Clinic, Columbus, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.