Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CASE REPORT article

Front. Nephrol., 30 June 2025

Sec. Glomerular disease

Volume 5 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fneph.2025.1593927

This article is part of the Research TopicPregnancy and Glomerular DiseaseView all articles

Case Report: Full-house renal-limited lupus-like nephritis in pregnancy

Lucille Jane Wilkinson*Lucille Jane Wilkinson1*Sally StauderSally Stauder1Brady CulpepperBrady Culpepper1Jalal IbrahimJalal Ibrahim2Vivekanand PantangiVivekanand Pantangi3Prathap Kumar SimhadriPrathap Kumar Simhadri4
  • 1College of Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States
  • 2College of Osteopathic Medicine, Lake Erie College, Bradenton, FL, United States
  • 3Department of Family Medicine, Advent Health, Daytona Beach, FL, United States
  • 4Department of Nephrology, Advent Health, Daytona Beach, FL, United States

Lupus nephropathy is a common manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), with immune-mediated inflammatory damage to the glomerulus leading to acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, and end-stage renal disease. Occasionally, patients present with renal-limited lupus nephropathy with classic full-house staining on immunofluorescence and no signs of systemic lupus. Limited data are available on renal-limited “lupus-like nephropathy” in pregnancy. A 24-year-old G1P0 woman at 14 weeks of gestation was referred to nephrology for further evaluation of 8.4g proteinuria. She was found to be ANA negative with a decreased C1q level and a renal biopsy revealing membranous nephropathy. Immunofluorescence staining was positive for IgG, IgA, IgM, C3, and C1Q, consistent with full-house pattern. She was started on 500 mg pulse dose methylprednisolone for 3 days, which was gradually tapered to 5 mg daily, and cyclosporine 75 mg BID. She delivered a healthy baby via induction at 36 weeks. Six-month follow-up revealed 1g protein on 24-hour urine collection, normal C3/C4 levels, and no signs of SLE. This case report adds to the literature discussing renal-limited “lupus-like nephropathy” in pregnancy and helps guide further management of this condition.

Introduction

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease recognized by a constellation of clinical, laboratory, and histopathological findings (1). Lupus nephropathy is a common manifestation of SLE, with immune-mediated inflammatory damage to the glomerulus leading to acute kidney injury (AKI), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and end-stage renal disease. The literature has described a small subset of patients demonstrating renal-limited “lupus-like nephropathy” in pregnancy, defined by pathological biopsy findings typical of lupus nephropathy without systemic manifestations or laboratory biomarkers of the disease (2). A full-house stain, identified by positive immunofluorescence staining of all three isotypes of immunoglobulins, is a pathological finding highly associated with SLE (3). However, few studies have identified renal-limited “lupus-like nephropathy” in pregnancy (4).

Case report

A 24-year-old G1P0 woman at 14 weeks gestation was referred to nephrology for evaluation of proteinuria after 24-hour urine collection revealed 8.4 grams of proteinuria. At presentation, she complained of bilateral lower extremity edema for over two weeks. She had no significant past medical conditions or family history of kidney disease or autoimmune disease. She denied any fevers, rashes, joint pain, orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, or use of NSAIDs, alcohol, tobacco products, or use of nephrotoxic agents. Physical exam findings were significant for +1 bilateral pitting lower extremity edema.

At 16 weeks gestation, 24-hour urine revealed 14 grams of proteinuria and a serum albumin level of 1.5 gr/dL. She was hospitalized for the management of nephrotic syndrome and was found to be ANA negative with a decreased C1q complement of 94 (102–171 mg/L), but was negative for other SLE autoantibodies (anti-Smith and anti-dsDNA) and had normal C3 (101 mg/dL, reference range 90–180 mg/dl) and C4 complement (33 mg/dl, reference range 10–40 mg/dL). She tested negative for lupus anticoagulant, cryoglobulins, paraproteinemia, and viral hepatitis. She underwent an ultrasound-guided kidney biopsy, which revealed membranous nephropathy with positive staining for IgG, IgA, IgM, C3, and C1Q, consistent with full-house immunoglobulin staining as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1
Panel A shows a fluorescent image with a network pattern in green. Panel B displays another fluorescent image with a more condensed and circular green pattern. Panel C is a light microscope image showing intricately stained tissue structures in purple and pink. Panel D presents an electron microscope image with detailed cellular structures in grayscale, highlighting organelles and cellular membranes.

Figure 1. (A) shows 1+ C1q staining. (B) shows 3+ Ig G staining on immunofluorescence. (C) shows diffuse thickening of capillary walls with fine lucencies on silver stain. (D) shows the presence of global subepithelial and intramembranous electron-dense deposits.

She was started on cyclosporine 75 mg BID and 500 mg pulse dose methylprednisolone for 3 days, which was then continued at 10 mg daily. She was maintained on therapeutic enoxaparin and aspirin 81 mg daily during the pregnancy to prevent thrombotic complications. Proteinuria started improving with the above regimen; it reached < 2gr/day and the serum albumin improved to 2.6 by 35 weeks of gestation, as depicted in Figure 2. She was continued on this medication regimen until induction at 36 weeks, when she delivered a healthy baby with 50% percentile birth weight. A 10-week post-partum follow-up revealed 1 gram of protein on a 24-hour urine collection and normal C3 and C4 levels. She continued to exhibit no signs of SLE, and the C1q complement level normalized. Methylprednisolone and cyclosporine were discontinued, and dapagliflozin and losartan were initiated for blood pressure management and renal protection. Her angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) dose was maximized, and at one-year post-partum she is doing well with proteinuria improved to < 500 mg/day.

Figure 2
Panel A shows a line graph labeled “24-Hour Urine Protein Trend,” tracking protein levels from 15 weeks gestation to one year postpartum. Levels decrease from 15,000 mg/day to below 1,000 mg/day after delivery at 36 weeks. Key interventions and events are noted. Panel B displays the “Serum Albumin Trend,” showing levels rising from 1.5 g/dL at 15 weeks gestation to 4.0 g/dL by one year postpartum.

Figure 2. (A) shows 24-hour urine protein trend over time, highlighting improvement in urine protein leakage over time. (B) shows serum albumin trend over time, indicating patient’s return to baseline albumin level after treatment.

Discussion

A 24-year-old pregnant female presented with pathological evidence of renal limited “lupus-like nephropathy” without clinical or laboratory evidence consistent with SLE. This case adds to the literature describing this condition. More evidence is essential to guide proper treatment and management of cases like this in the future.

In congruence with the small number of reported cases of renal limited “lupus like nephropathy”, our patient presented during pregnancy with edema and no history of kidney disease or SLE. Compared to other cases, our patient had significant proteinuria of 14 grams, whereas other patients ranged from 3 grams to 8 grams with the exception of one case of 16.6 grams of proteinuria as shown in Table 1 (4, 5). Of the few studies reporting on renal limited “lupus-like nephropathy” in pregnancy, only the adolescent patients delivered small for gestational age-sized babies, while the other patients, including our patient, delivered normal for gestational age-sized babies (4, 5). Only two patients have been reported in the literature to develop SLE after complete remission of lupus-like nephropathy during pregnancy, one at 7 years and the other at 11 years after the pregnancy as shown in Table 1.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Comparison to other reported cases.

Similar to our case, other studies emphasize the potential for good long-term outcomes with the use of proactive, aggressive treatment of glomerulonephritis in pregnancy (4, 5). It is important to note that some patients were lost to follow-up after a certain number of years, so it is difficult to predict the possible outcomes for these patients (4).

In regard to cases of lupus-like nephritis in non-pregnant patients, prior research has indicated that 25% of these patients develop SLE after a mean follow-up period of 5 years and the renal prognosis of these patients appears to be better than that of patients with lupus membranous glomerulonephritis (2). There have been a range of studies describing cases of non-pregnant patients with lupus like-nephritis with variable treatment regimens and outcomes, ranging from complete remission to end stage renal disease (1, 2, 6). This highlights the need for continued research in this topic to elucidate patterns and the mechanism of this pathology.

Conclusion

There is a small but growing number of cases reporting renal-limited lupus-like membranous nephropathy in pregnancy. Our case report describes a 24-year-old female presenting with renal-limited full-house membranous nephropathy at 14 weeks of gestation. The clinical course outlined in this case report adds to the limited amount of knowledge we have regarding proper treatment plans and prognoses in this disease.

Patient perspective

Our patient expressed her heart felt gratitude for being there with her during her pregnancy journey in the management of nephrotic range proteinuria. She is happy with the progress she had with the treatment during the pregnancy and her overall outcome.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

LW: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SS: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. BC: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. JI: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. VP: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. PS: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneph.2025.1593927/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Huerta A, Bomback AS, Liakopoulos V, Palanisamy A, Stokes MB, D’Agati VD, et al. Renal-limited ‘lupus-like’ nephritis. Nephrol Dial Transpl. (2012) 27:2337–42. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr663

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Sam R, Joshi A, James S, Jen KY, Amani F, Hart P, et al. Lupus-like membranous nephropathy: Is it lupus or not? Clin Exp Nephrol. (2015) 19:395–402. doi: 10.1007/s10157-014-1002-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Wani AS, Zahir Z, Gupta A, and Agrawal V. Clinicopathological pattern of non-lupus full house nephropathy. Indian J Nephrol. (2020) 30:301–6. doi: 10.4103/ijn.IJN_91_18

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Orozco-Guillén AO, Abraham VS, Moguel Gonzalez B, Valdez Ortiz R, Ibarguengoitia F, Del Carmen ZM, et al. Kidney-limited full-house lupus-like membranous nephropathy and membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis in pregnancy. Kidney Int Rep. (2023) 8:932–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.01.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Yamada T, Itagaki F, Aratani S, Kawasaki S, Terada K, Mugishima K, et al. A case of membranous nephropathy diagnosed with lupus nephritis 11 years after onset. CEN Case Rep. (2019) 8:301–7. doi: 10.1007/s13730-019-00412-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Touzot M, Terrier CS, Faguer S, Masson I, François H, Couzi L, et al. Proliferative lupus nephritis in the absence of overt systemic lupus erythematosus: A historical study of 12 adult patients. Med (Baltimore). (2017) 96:e9017. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009017

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: full house nephropathy, lupus like nephritis, lupus nephropathy, renal limited lupus, nephrotic syndrome, nephrotic syndrome in pregnancy, lupus in pregnancy, membranous

Citation: Wilkinson LJ, Stauder S, Culpepper B, Ibrahim J, Pantangi V and Simhadri PK (2025) Case Report: Full-house renal-limited lupus-like nephritis in pregnancy. Front. Nephrol. 5:1593927. doi: 10.3389/fneph.2025.1593927

Received: 14 March 2025; Accepted: 09 June 2025;
Published: 30 June 2025.

Edited by:

Sree Bhushan Raju, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, India

Reviewed by:

David Andrew Fulcher, Australian National University, Australia
Prit Pal Singh, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, India

Copyright © 2025 Wilkinson, Stauder, Culpepper, Ibrahim, Pantangi and Simhadri. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Lucille Jane Wilkinson, bGp3MThmQGZzdS5lZHU=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.