ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Nephrol.
Sec. Kidney Transplantation
Tacrolimus intrapatient variability and rejection are associated with inferior allograft outcomes after kidney transplantation
Provisionally accepted- 1Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- 2University College London, London, United Kingdom
- 3Anthony Nolan Histocompatibility Laboratories, London, United Kingdom
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Early kidney transplant failure has significant negative impact for individuals and healthcare systems. Contemporary data investigating early allograft failure are lacking. We undertook a retrospective observational cohort study of adult patients who underwent kidney transplantation at a single European centre. We determined causes of allograft failure between 1 and 5 years after transplant and explored clinical variables present at 1 year that predicted allograft loss. 591 patients (median age 50 years, 64.1% male, and 44% white) were included; 531 (89.8%) had graft survival and 60 (10.2%) had graft loss between 1- and 5-years. Rejection was the primary cause of graft failure in 24 (40%) cases and 54% had undetectable tacrolimus levels prior to failure event. Female sex, serum creatinine at 1 year, the occurrence of rejection, and undetectable tacrolimus levels were associated with increased odds of graft loss. In subsequent analysis of 787 patients alive with a functioning graft at 1 year, recipient age, serum creatinine, proteinuria, any rejection episode, and tacrolimus intrapatient variability (IPV) at 1 year were associated with an increased hazard of graft loss. Hence, graft losses were predominantly alloimmune mediated, often associated with non-adherence, and were predicted by tacrolimus IPV at 1 year.
Keywords: rejection, adherence, Tacrolimus, outcomes, Graft failure
Received: 15 Jul 2025; Accepted: 24 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Javed, Sanghera, Khan, Nagpal, Butler, Hobill, Gage, Karst, Needleman, Hmun, Thal, Shirling, Fernando, Jones, Harber and Evans. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Rhys Evans
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
