Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

OPINION article

Front. Nephrol., 19 December 2025

Sec. Clinical Research in Nephrology

Volume 5 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fneph.2025.1713215

This article is part of the Research TopicRising Stars in Nephrology 2024: Illuminating the Future of Kidney HealthView all 8 articles

Has the time come to change the treatment criteria for patients with chronic kidney disease? The “hypofiltering nephron” hypothesis

  • 1Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
  • 2Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
  • 3Clinical Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy

“Personalized medicine” denotes the future of disease treatment. This implies that etiologically distinct entities, even if they converge on a common disease pathway, may benefit from differentiated treatments. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is one example of this, as it has long been regarded as a sort of common container in which patients are treated similarly regardless of the underlying disease. In fact, all patients with CKD are treated as if they meet Bricker’s “intact nephron” hypothesis (1). This hypothesis, which was developed in the 1960s, assumes that the residual nephrons compensate for the reduction in the number of functioning nephrons because of kidney injury by increasing the fractional contribution of each nephron to the total excretion rate. This mechanism reduces the decline in total kidney function by causing a single intact nephron to hyperfilter, which occurs by increasing the glomerular blood hydrostatic pressure (↑ΔP) in conjunction with its hypertrophy (2).

The current Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD classification is based solely on estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and albuminuria categories and does not distinguish between different patterns of nephron function (3). As a result, mechanistically heterogeneous patients are grouped into the same prognostic category despite potentially distinct pathophysiological processes. The hyperfiltering nephron model has significantly influenced our understanding of CKD progression for decades. However, it fails to account for patients who experience a decline in GFR without the development of albuminuria, even in the presence of substantial vascular disease. To address this gap, we define a “hypofiltering nephron” as a structurally viable nephron with preserved filtration surface area but reduced single-nephron GFR (SNGFR) caused by increased preglomerular vascular resistance and hypoperfusion. This model complements, rather than contradicts, Bricker’s paradigm and may help clarify a significant and poorly understood group of nonalbuminuric CKD patients.

Hyperfiltration models suggest that increased ΔP, seen in conditions such as hypertension-related nephropathy, reduced kidney mass nephrectomy, albuminuric diabetes, or other CKD secondary to glomerulonephritis evolution, including obesity-related glomerulopathy, results in mechanical stress on glomerular capillaries (4, 5). This mechanical stress activates complex molecular pathways that facilitate the elongation of capillaries and expand their surface area as a compensatory mechanism, ultimately leading to increased collagen synthesis and fibrosis (6). Mechanical stress, together with inflammatory and oxidative signals, promotes podocyte injury and reduces podocyte density, compromising the filtration barrier. The resulting increase in the ultrafiltration coefficient (Kf), reflecting a larger effective filtration surface and higher permeability, leads to albuminuria, which further accelerates sclerosis in residual nephrons (7). This pathogenesis justifies the use of treatments that lower glomerular hyperfiltration and reduce protein loss in the urine, which can slow the progression of kidney disease (see Figure 1).

Figure 1
Diagram illustrating hyperfiltering and hypofiltering nephrons. The top shows hyperfiltering with increased SNGFR, ΔP, and Kf, leading to overt proteinuria. Treatment with ACEi/ARB and SGLT2i reduces SNGFR, ΔP, and Kf. The bottom shows hypofiltering in atherosclerotic nephropathy with decreased SNGFR, ΔP, and Kf, resulting in normal proteinuria. Treatment further decreases SNGFR, ΔP, and Kf. Vasodilation and vasoconstriction are indicated, with notes on endothelial dysfunction and impaired vascular reactivity.

Figure 1. Residual nephrons increase their fractional contribution to global filtration rate to compensate for the decrease in nephron number caused by glomerular injury. Hyperfiltration and residual nephron hypertrophy increase glomerular blood hydrostatic pressure (↑ΔP), preventing kidney function decline. In the long term, this compensatory process raises glomerular basal membrane permeability (↑Kf), resulting in overt albuminuria. This pathophysiology suggests that interventions aimed at reducing nephron hyperfiltration and albuminuria may prevent kidney disease progression. The same treatment, however, may not be appropriate in nonalbuminuric atherosclerotic nephropathy, in which the increased resistance of medium-sized intrarenal arteries hypoperfuses the nephrons, lowering SNGFR without overt albuminuria. Ang II-induced efferent vasoconstriction limits the decline in SNGFR. If Ang II is inhibited (ACEi/ARB/SGLT2i) or afferent vasoconstriction is enhanced (SGLT2i), SNGFR and overall kidney function might be compromised. SNGFR, single nephron glomerular filtration rate; Ang-II, angiotensin II; ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB, angiotensin receptor blockers; SGLT2i, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors.

The “hypofiltering nephron” model proposes that vascular and tubulointerstitial dysfunction can occur without glomerular hyperfiltration (8). A hypofiltering nephron remains structurally intact but is underperfused due to increased resistance before the glomerulus, resulting in a reduced SNGFR despite a preserved filtration surface area. This situation is distinct from (i) nephron loss, where filtration units are completely absent, and (ii) the failure of compensatory hyperfiltration in the remaining nephrons, as described by Bricker. Although these mechanisms may coexist throughout the progression of nonalbuminuric CKD, only the first mechanism truly reflects vascular-driven hypofiltration. A clear distinction between the two models is reported in Table 1.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Principal features of the two models.

Accelerated vascular aging or systemic atherosclerosis can affect medium-sized intrarenal vessels, including interlobar and arcuate arteries. The increased resistance in these vessels leads to a reduced renal plasma flow and decreased total and single-nephron ultrafiltration coefficients (↓Kf), while the effect on glomerular capillary pressure (ΔP) remains uncertain in humans (9). This process progresses without the onset of pathological albuminuria due to the absence of glomerular hyperfiltration in residual nephrons and defines “atherosclerotic nephropathy”. In the aging as well as hypertensive kidney, nephrosclerosis is the most common finding, consisting of glomerulosclerosis, arteriosclerosis, tubular atrophy, and tubulointerstitial fibrosis (10). In some instances of aging kidneys, the anticipated residual glomerular hypertrophy and hyperfiltering compensation do not develop to counteract the decrease in GFR as nephrosclerosis progresses (10). Additionally, in cases of hypertension, arterial remodeling and atherosclerotic vascular dysfunction can lead to secondary chronic kidney ischemia and a further decline in GFR, even when there is no significant renal artery stenosis present (11). Moreover, diabetic nephropathy, especially when associated with older age or cardiovascular risk factors, can progress without signs of hyperfiltration or albuminuria (12). In our hypothesis, similar processes could explain the nonalbuminuric GFR decline and the evolution of “atherosclerotic nephropathy” (13), in which nephron hypoperfusion and failure to mount a hyperfiltration response may coexist and participate in nephron loss and CKD progression.

Aging, hypertension and diabetes are major risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and share a common background of chronic oxidative stress that reduces nitric oxide bioavailability and disrupts endothelial-dependent vasodilation (14). The resulting predominance of vasoconstrictor pathways, including endothelin-1 (ET-1) and angiotensin (Ang) II, promotes structural remodeling of the intrarenal vasculature, characterized by medial thickening, hyalinization and increased stiffness (15). These changes narrow the lumen of interlobar and arcuate arteries, reducing renal plasma flow and glomerular perfusion pressure. In residual nephrons, this manifests as a reduction in SNGFR without increased permeability of the glomerular barrier. Progressive hypoperfusion also contributes to chronic hypoxia, which accelerates tubulointerstitial fibrosis and nephron loss (16).

Atherosclerotic nephropathy is characterized by increased resistance in medium-sized preglomerular intrarenal arteries, which reduces renal plasma flow and leads to underperfusion of otherwise nonsclerotic nephrons, resulting in a hypofiltering, typically nonalbuminuric phenotype. Mechanistically, Carrara et al. found that in type 2 diabetes with hypertension and without albuminuria, a higher preglomerular/postglomerular resistance ratio was associated with a greater decline in GFR, indicating the significance of preglomerular vascular resistance and hypoperfusion in disease progression (17). Clinically, the intrarenal Doppler-derived renal resistive index (RRI) serves as an effective indicator of nephrovascular hemodynamics. It increases with age and correlates with CKD progression and fibrosis, independent of albuminuria (18, 19). In our retrospective cohort of high cardiovascular-risk patients with nonproteinuric CKD, an elevated RRI was linked to an accelerated decline in GFR over five years and increased long-term mortality (13). Additionally, the most significant decline in GFR was noted when proteinuria was present alongside elevated RRI (20). These observations support the hypofiltering-nephron concept: increased intrarenal vascular resistance correlates with CKD progression regardless of albuminuria, and its association with proteinuria may indicate a more severe, dual-mechanism pathway (hypoperfusion and barrier injury). Future mechanistic studies are required to evaluate causality and therapeutic implications.

We believe that the evidence available today strongly suggests that patients with CKD and hypofiltering residual nephrons should be treated differently than those with hyperfiltration of residual nephrons, because in the former case, it is precisely the generalized hypofiltration that causes the GFR drop, and, in this case, drugs that exacerbate glomerular hypofiltration might worsen the kidney function. As a result, using the precision medicine principle, we should identify patients with nonalbuminuric CKD, atherosclerotic vascular disease, or increased RRI who could benefit from a tailored therapeutic approach based on the hypofiltering nephron hypothesis. The patient with progressive diabetic nephropathy is the best example. The development of Kimmelstiel-Wilson glomerulonephritis causes residual nephrons to become hyperfiltering and albuminuric in the albuminuric variant of diabetic nephropathy (21). However, nonalbuminuric diabetic nephropathy can also progress to significant CKD. Since glomerular blood flow is decreased because of the medium-sized intrarenal arteries’ atherosclerotic disease, the remaining nephrons in this latter scenario are hypofiltering, and albuminuria remains within the normal range. Garofolo et al. found that in patients affected by type 2 diabetes, those nonalbuminuric with CKD had a higher RRI than those nonalbuminuric without CKD. Additionally, nonalbuminuric patients with CKD had a lower kidney volume than those with albuminuric CKD. According to this study, patients with nonalbuminuric diabetic nephropathy may exhibit an atherosclerotic nephropathy since their RRI is increased and their kidney morphology suggests more advanced ischemic and fibrotic processes than those with albuminuric diabetic nephropathy (22).

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) have not shown consistent kidney-protective effects in patients with nonalbuminuric CKD, regardless of diabetes status (23). Similarly, in the EMPA-KIDNEY trial, the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) empagliflozin slowed chronic GFR decline across all albuminuria categories, although the reduction in the primary composite outcome of kidney disease progression or cardiovascular death was not statistically significant in the strictly normoalbuminuric subgroup (24). Despite this, ACEi, ARB and SGLT2i remain the standard first-line therapy in diabetic nephropathy. This approach is appropriate for albuminuric nephropathy, where glomerular hyperfiltration and increased permeability of the filtration barrier accelerate sclerosis of the residual nephrons through Ang II–mediated mechanisms (25). In contrast, the same therapeutic strategy may be less appropriate in nonalbuminuric nephropathy. In this phenotype, viable nephrons are hypoperfused due to increased resistance in medium-sized intrarenal arteries; in selected hypofiltration phenotypes, suppressing Ang II may be counterproductive because Ang II–mediated efferent arteriolar constriction helps maintain glomerular pressure and partially preserve SNGFR. Consequently, treatments that reduce Ang II activity (ACEi or ARB) or further constrict the afferent arteriole (SGLT2i) (26) could compromise a compensatory mechanism that supports filtration in the hypofiltering nephron (see Figure 1).

In prospective, cautious, individualized use of ACEi, ARB, and SGLT2i may be appropriate in patients with nonalbuminuric CKD attributable to atherosclerotic nephropathy, given the possibility that further reductions in intraglomerular pressure could exacerbate hypofiltration in some patients. Agents that restore intrarenal perfusion or counter hypofiltration may offer greater benefit in this phenotype, but clinical evidence remains limited. We previously explored ET-1 pathway modulation because ET-1 is a potent vasoconstrictor in the intrarenal circulation. In patients with systemic sclerosis complicated by digital ulcers, without albuminuria or kidney failure but with elevated RRI, the dual ET-1 receptor antagonist bosentan did not change RRI but reduced mean arterial pressure and GFR (27). This pattern suggests that, in early atherosclerotic nephropathy with preserved or mildly reduced kidney function, ET-1 supports glomerular filtration and its blockade can impair the kidney function. These observations argue for cautious use of ET-1 antagonism in suspected nephrons hypofiltration until targeted trials are available. By contrast, pentoxifylline, a nonselective phosphodiesterase inhibitor with anti-inflammatory, antiproliferative, and antifibrotic properties, has been associated with less progression of subclinical atherosclerosis and a smaller GFR decline than controls in patients with diabetic nephropathy over 18 months (28). Although no direct trials have evaluated pentoxifylline specifically in nonalbuminuric CKD, its vascular and anti-inflammatory actions make it a hypothesis-generating option that warrants prospective evaluation in this population.

Although effective therapeutic strategies have been developed to prevent CKD in patients with albuminuria, specific strategies for those without albuminuria and increased intrarenal vascular resistance remain lacking. Considering that patients affected by nonalbuminuric CKD outnumber those with albuminuria (29), it is essential to enhance our understanding of this predominant form of CKD progression to develop new tailored therapies. In clinical settings, a combined biomarker–imaging approach may be the best strategy. This can include measurements of circulating markers of endothelial dysfunction or injury that have been correlated with kidney outcomes such as ET-1, asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), soluble vascular or intracellular adhesion molecules (VCAM-1 or ICAM-1), von Willebrand factor (vWF), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) (30). Additionally, imaging modalities such as Doppler-derived RRI, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based perfusion techniques may assist in identifying patients with elevated intrarenal vascular resistance (31). Moreover, it is important to recognize that for patients with a presumed nephron hypofiltration phenotype, therapies aimed at reducing intraglomerular pressure or reducing afferent perfusion might provide limited benefits or necessitate individualized titration. The therapeutic effects in this scenario may significantly differ from those observed in patients with albuminuric CKD resulting from glomerular hyperfiltration.

Finally, our hypothesis requires validation through predictive mathematical modeling and focused experimental and prospective clinical studies, including early-phase trials of agents that target nephron hypofiltration in nonalbuminuric CKD. An integrated program combining mechanistic and clinical strategies will be essential. Longitudinal evaluations of RRI and renal plasma flow could clarify whether rising intrarenal vascular resistance precedes GFR decline. Advanced imaging, such as arterial spin–labeling MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, may enable quantitative, in vivo assessment of intrarenal perfusion. Ultimately, stratified interventional trials comparing treatment responses in albuminuric versus nonalbuminuric/high-RRI phenotypes will determine the therapeutic significance of this model.

Author contributions

GR: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. GF: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. GC: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. The publication fee for this study was funded by the Department of Medical Sciences at the University of Ferrara for GC.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author GC declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. ChatGPT (OpenAI) was used exclusively for grammatical and stylistic editing. The authors reviewed and edited all AI-generated suggestions, take full responsibility for the content of the manuscript, and confirm that no AI tool was used to generate, analyze, or interpret scientific data.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Bricker NS. On the meaning of the intact nephron hypothesis. Am J Med. (1969) 46:1–11. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(69)90053-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Fattah H, Layton A, and Vallon V. How do kidneys adapt to a deficit or loss in nephron number? Physiology. (2019) 34:189–97. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00052.2018

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group. KDIGO 2024 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. (2024) 105:S117–314. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2023.10.018

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Richfield O, Cortez R, and Navar LG. Simulations of glomerular shear and hoop stresses in diabetes, hypertension, and reduced renal mass using a network model of a rat glomerulus. Physiol Rep. (2020) 8:e14577. doi: 10.14814/phy2.14577

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Darouich S, Goucha R, Jaafoura MH, Zekri S, Ben Maiz H, and Kheder A. Clinicopathological characteristics of obesity-associated focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Ultrastruct Pathol. (2011) 35:176–82. doi: 10.3109/01913123.2011.584657

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Riser BL, Cortes P, Yee J, Sharba AK, Asano K, Rodriguez-Barbero A, et al. Mechanical strain- and high glucose-induced alterations in mesangial cell collagen metabolism: role of TGF-beta. J Am Soc Nephrol JASN. (1998) 9:827–36. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V95827

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Kanbay M, Copur S, Bakir CN, Covic A, Ortiz A, and Tuttle KR. Glomerular hyperfiltration as a therapeutic target for CKD. Nephrol Dial Transplant. (2024) 39:1228–38. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfae027

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Tonolo G and Cherchi S. Tubulointerstitial disease in diabetic nephropathy. Int J Nephrol Renov Dis. (2014) 7:107–15. doi: 10.2147/IJNRD.S37883

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Hoang K, Tan JC, Derby G, Blouch KL, Masek M, Ma I, et al. Determinants of glomerular hypofiltration in aging humans. Kidney Int. (2003) 64:1417–24. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00207.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Denic A, Glassock RJ, and Rule AD. Structural and functional changes with the aging kidney. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. (2016) 23:19–28. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2015.08.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Mennuni S, Rubattu S, Pierelli G, Tocci G, Fofi C, and Volpe M. Hypertension and kidneys: unraveling complex molecular mechanisms underlying hypertensive renal damage. J Hum Hypertens. (2014) 28:74–9. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2013.55

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Dai Q, Chen N, Zeng L, Lin X-J, Jiang F-X, Zhuang X-J, et al. Clinical features of and risk factors for normoalbuminuric diabetic kidney disease in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cross-sectional study. BMC Endocr Disord. (2021) 21:104. doi: 10.1186/s12902-021-00769-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Romano G, Mioni R, Danieli N, Bertoni M, Croatto E, Merla L, et al. Elevated intrarenal resistive index predicted faster renal function decline and long-term mortality in non-proteinuric chronic kidney disease. J Clin Med. (2022) 11:2995. doi: 10.3390/jcm11112995

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Araujo M and Wilcox CS. Oxidative stress in hypertension: role of the kidney. Antioxid Redox Signal. (2014) 20:74–101. doi: 10.1089/ars.2013.5259

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Schlüter T, Zimmermann U, Protzel C, Miehe B, Klebingat K-J, Rettig R, et al. Intrarenal artery superoxide is mainly NADPH oxidase-derived and modulates endothelium-dependent dilation in elderly patients. Cardiovasc Res. (2010) 85:814–24. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvp346

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Fine LG and Norman JT. Chronic hypoxia as a mechanism of progression of chronic kidney diseases: from hypothesis to novel therapeutics. Kidney Int. (2008) 74:867–72. doi: 10.1038/ki.2008.350

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Carrara F, Parvanova A, Gaspari F, Bossi A, Iliev IP, Stucchi N, et al. Increased pre-glomerular resistance and kidney hypoperfusion may sustain accelerated GFR decline in hypertensive, type 2 diabetics with normal and high normal albuminuria. Nephrol Dial Transplant. (2018) 33:i317. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy104.SaO006

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Kosaki K, Tarumi T, Sugawara J, Tanahashi K, Kumagai H, Matsui M, et al. Renal hemodynamics across the adult lifespan: Relevance of flow pulsatility to chronic kidney disease. Exp Gerontol. (2021) 152:111459. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2021.111459

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Calabia J, Torguet P, Garcia I, Martin N, Mate G, Marin A, et al. The relationship between renal resistive index, arterial stiffness, and atherosclerotic burden: the link between macrocirculation and microcirculation. J Clin Hypertens. (2014) 16:186–91. doi: 10.1111/jch.12248

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Romano G, Fiorini N, Bertoni M, Rondinella S, Di Pietra L, Cola MF, et al. Effect of combined proteinuria and increased renal resistive index on chronic kidney disease progression: A retrospective longitudinal study. J Clin Med. (2025) 14:228. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010228

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Tonneijck L, Muskiet MHA, Smits MM, van Bommel EJ, Heerspink HJL, van Raalte DH, et al. Glomerular hyperfiltration in diabetes: mechanisms, clinical significance, and treatment. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2017) 28:1023–39. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016060666

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Garofolo M, Napoli V, Lucchesi D, Accogli S, Mazzeo ML, Rossi P, et al. Type 2 diabetes albuminuric and non-albuminuric phenotypes have different morphological and functional ultrasound features of diabetic kidney disease. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. (2023) 39:e3585. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3585

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Cooper TE, Teng C, Tunnicliffe DJ, Cashmore BA, and Strippoli GF. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for adults with early (stage 1 to 3) non-diabetic chronic kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2023) 2023:CD007751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007751.pub3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. EMPA-KIDNEY Collaborative Group. Empagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. (2023) 388:117–27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2204233

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Palm F. The dark side of angiotensin II: direct dynamic regulation of the glomerular filtration barrier permeability to macromolecules. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. (2012) 303:F789. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00358.2012

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Upadhyay A. SGLT2 inhibitors and kidney protection: mechanisms beyond tubuloglomerular feedback. Kidney360. (2024) 5:771–82. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000000000000425

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Di Poi E, Colussi G, Bertoni M, Giovannini I, Tolusso B, Ferraccioli GF, et al. Bosentan does not affect renal resistive index in scleroderma/systemic sclerosis patients. Kidney Blood Press Res. (2023) 48:728–37. doi: 10.1159/000534642

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Donate-Correa J, Ferri CM, Mora-Fernández C, Pérez-Delgado N, González-Luis A, and Navarro-González JF. Pentoxifylline ameliorates subclinical atherosclerosis progression in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: a randomized pilot trial. Cardiovasc Diabetol. (2024) 23:314. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02393-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Bolignano D and Zoccali C. Non-proteinuric rather than proteinuric renal diseases are the leading cause of end-stage kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. (2017) 32:ii194–9. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw440

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Cho ME, Brunt VE, Shiu Y-T, and Bunsawat K. Endothelial dysfunction in chronic kidney disease: a clinical perspective. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. (2025) 329:H135–53. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00908.202

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Francis ST, Selby NM, and Taal MW. Magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate kidney structure, function, and pathology: moving toward clinical application. Am J Kidney Dis. (2023) 82:491–504. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.02.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: nephron, glomerular filtration rate, renal resistive index, atherosclerotic nephropathy, renal circulation, pentoxifylline

Citation: Romano G, Ferraccioli G and Colussi G (2025) Has the time come to change the treatment criteria for patients with chronic kidney disease? The “hypofiltering nephron” hypothesis. Front. Nephrol. 5:1713215. doi: 10.3389/fneph.2025.1713215

Received: 25 September 2025; Accepted: 24 November 2025; Revised: 22 November 2025;
Published: 19 December 2025.

Edited by:

Piergiorgio Messa, University of Milan, Italy

Reviewed by:

Maria Amicone, Federico II University Hospital, Italy
Nikhil Raisinghani, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, United States

Copyright © 2025 Romano, Ferraccioli and Colussi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: GianLuca Colussi, Z2lhbmx1Y2EuY29sdXNzaUB1bmlmZS5pdA==

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.