Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Netw. Physiol.

Sec. Networks in the Cardiovascular System

This article is part of the Research TopicArtificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular ResearchView all 7 articles

Towards standardizing Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair with deep-learning algorithm: a comprehensive multi-model strategy

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Universite de Montreal Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Canada
  • 2Interventional and Structural Cardiology, Institut De Cardiologie de Montreal, Montreal, Canada
  • 3Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Canada
  • 4Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Canada
  • 5Institut De Cardiologie de Montreal, Montreal, Canada
  • 6UMCV, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux Hopital Cardiologique, Pessac, France

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Severe mitral valve regurgitation requires comprehensive evaluation for optimal treatment. Initial screening uses transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), followed by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to determine eligibility for adequate intervention. Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair (M-TEER) indications are based on detailed and quality valve and sub-valvular apparatus assessment, including anatomy and regurgitation pathophysiology. Aim: To develop AI algorithms for standardizing M-TEER eligibility assessment using TTE and TEE echocardiograms, supporting all stages of mitral valve regurgitation evaluation to assist non-expert centers throughout the entire process, from severe mitral valve regurgitation diagnostic to M-TEER procedure. Methods: Three deep learning algorithms were developed using echocardiographic data from M-TEER patients performed at Montreal Heart Institute (2018-2025). 1) ECHO-PREP was trained to identify key diagnostic views in TTE (n=530) and diagnostic and procedural views in TEE (n=2222) examinations to determine the level of quality images needed to do a M-TEER. 2) 4D TEE segmentation with automated mitral valve area (MVA) quantification (n=221), and (3) 2D TEE scallop-level segmentation of leaflets and sub-valvular structures (n=992). Results: Preliminary results on test sets showed 95.7% accuracy in TTE view classification and 91% accuracy for TEE view classification. The 4D segmentation module demonstrated excellent agreement with manual MVA measurements (R=0.84, p<0.001), successfully discriminating patients undergoing M-TEER from those referred for surgical replacement (p=0.046 for AI predictions). The 2D scallop-level analysis achieved a mean Dice score of 0.534 across 11 anatomical structures, with better performance in commonly represented configurations (e.g., A2-P2, P1-A2-P3). Conclusion: ECHO-PREP demonstrates the feasibility of an integrated AI-assisted workflow for MR assessment, combining quality control, dynamic 4D valve quantification, and scallop-level anatomy interpretation. These results support the potential of AI to standardize M-TEER eligibility, reduce inter-observer variability, and provide decision support across centers with different levels of expertise.

Keywords: Mitral regurgitation, AI, M-TEER, Deep-learning, structural cardiology, segmentation, TEE, 4D

Received: 09 Sep 2025; Accepted: 10 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Corona, Godefroy, Tastet, Corbin, Modine, Von Bardeleben, Lesage and Ben Ali. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Silvia Corona, silviacoro89@gmail.com
Walid Ben Ali, dr.walidbenali@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.