Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Physiol., 08 April 2024
Sec. Developmental Physiology
This article is part of the Research Topic Adverse outcomes of preeclampsia: From mother to baby, pregnancy to postpartum View all 10 articles

Editorial: Adverse outcomes of preeclampsia: from mother to baby, pregnancy to postpartum

  • 1UQ Centre for Clinical Research and Perinatal Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  • 2Department of Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, United States
  • 3Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, United States
  • 4Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, United States
  • 5School of Life Sciences and Institute for Biomedical Materials and Devices, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Preeclampsia is a dangerous pregnancy-specific complication that involves new-onset hypertension and signs of systemic vascular dysfunction (Bisson et al.). Beyond pregnancy, women are at greater risk for devastating illnesses including cardiac disease (deMartelly et al., 2021), Alzheimer’s disease (Theilen et al., 2016) and stroke (Bellamy et al., 2007; Theilen et al., 2016). Moreover, their offspring present with disturbances in hormonal, metabolic and neurodevelopmental pathways that likely accelerate onset of disease with age (Nahum Sacks et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2023). These observations warrant ongoing research, not only to understand the mechanisms, but because clinicians lack reliable pharmacotherapies to cure preeclampsia. In this editorial, we present pre/clinical original research and literature reviews, including work on biomarkers and molecular pathways that are necessary to identify druggable targets to halt sudden and long-term ramifications.

Preeclampsia has been recognized to foreshadow ensuing chronic disease in women and their baby, which demonstrates the need for advances in earlier prediction and interventions. On this Research Topic, Bisson et al. reviewed a set of studies stressing the requirement to include biomarkers beyond gestational-related blood pressure levels as the latter alone does not strongly predict preeclampsia. Work from this team and their colleagues has contributed to our understanding of the powerful predictive nature of sFlt-1:PlGF ratios in preeclampsia (Bisson et al.) whereby elevations are indicative of a vasoconstrictive milieu within the maternal circulation. Combining this value with blood pressure has a strong association with hospitalizations due to preeclampsia. It is fathomable that strategies to confidently predict preeclampsia as early as possible would allow time to combat and prevent this disease.

Han et al. reviewed use of biomarkers for predicting late-onset, term preeclampsia, which is more prevalent and not as well detected as early-onset preeclampsia. They found that there are currently no molecular biomarkers with sufficient clinical sensitivity and specificity. Several limitations likely muddled these results but could be overcome standardizing definitions of preeclampsia subtypes as well as sample collection. In a study by Kandel et al. that assessed biomarkers for early- and late-onset preeclampsia, they found reduced galectin-3, which is a marker of cardiovascular disease and heart failure (Chen et al., 2021) in non-pregnant patients, in the former and not latter subtype. However, in another study where preeclampsia subtypes were combined, expression of galectin-3 was increased (Ghorbanpour et al., 2023). Thus, more work is needed to determine if there are biomarkers that can predict timing and severity of preeclampsia.

While biomarkers help to educate clinicians on management options, there are educational opportunities for the patient that could emphasize the seriousness of hypertension in preeclampsia that are associated with lower blood pressure after pregnancy, including: 1) awareness that adversities from preeclampsia can extend past parturition, such as cardiac abnormalities (deMartelly et al., 2021), and dictate a future shortened by hypertensive disease in mother and baby and 2) programs that simplify adoption of routine blood pressure measurement and follow-up appointments. Added opportunities to seek advice, such as with telehealth medicine, are likely needed as online sentiments of emotional support increase and stay high during pregnancy (Hou and Hou).

Beckett et al. reviewed cerebrovascular disease and cognitive impairment in preeclampsia and beyond. The psychological outcomes of pregnancy can be adversely influenced by preeclampsia targeting the cerebrovasculature. Importantly, preeclampsia can quickly advance to eclampsia, which manifests as new-onset seizures and accounts for 13% of maternal deaths worldwide (Nour, 2008; Beckett et al.). Although not fully understood, one mediator may be white matter lesions, which are present in over 60% of women with a history of preeclampsia (Soma-Pillay et al., 2017). Another possible culprit is inflammation. Herrock et al. described how pro-inflammatory cells and cytokines cause widespread endothelial injury. This can disrupt the blood brain barrier and feedforward to promote neuroinflammation, cerebrovascular dysfunction, and white matter lesioning (Beckett et al.).

Neurodevelopmental disorders occur at a greater rate in offspring born from preeclamptic pregnancies. Several studies report that they have increased risk of autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and intellectual disability (Ehrenstein et al., 2009; Dang et al., 2016; Alsnes et al., 2017; Nahum Sacks et al., 2018; Gumusoglu et al., 2020). Although these associations exist, less is known about the pathogenic mechanisms. Interluekin-6 (IL-6) is elevated in preeclampsia and contributes to the pro-inflammatory environment that exists in this disease (Bakrania et al., 2020). Despite this, Barron et al. found that in neuroblastoma cells exposed to sera from preeclamptic women, neurite growth and mitochondrial respiration were elevated, in part, due to increased IL-6. Further exploration of the neurodevelopmental implications of this, and other pathogenic factors are critical to properly understand underlying mechanisms.

There is also increased risk for systemic cardiovascular, metabolic and reproductive diseases in preeclampsia-exposed offspring. In a preclinical study, the timing of onset for puberty was significantly earlier in female, but not male, mice originating from preeclamptic BPH/5 mice (Gomes et al.). These data coincide with previous literature that indicate a dominant androgenic profile in female offspring of pregnancies affected by preeclampsia (Ogland et al., 2011; Alsnes et al., 2016). Cardiometabolic characteristics, that are also associated with increased risk of preeclampsia, have also been documented to be elevated in female offspring of BHP/5 mice, but not their male littermates, such as increased food intake, increased body weight, hyperleptinaemia and increased visceral white adipose tissue. Preclinical studies show that overexpression of leptin promotes the pathogenesis of this disease and continued research focuses on whether elevated levels are a novel biomarker for preeclampsia (Wang et al.).

In summary, our editorial highlights original research and literature reviews that focus on the sequelae of preeclampsia. Such adversities impact both mothers and their offspring, not only during, but well beyond pregnancy. There is a desperate need for translational research that utilize human data on biomarkers to design preclinical models assessing their pathogenic potential as targets for pharmacotherapies to prevent outcomes of preeclampsia. Aside from finding a cure, recommendations include a focus on standardizing diagnostic criteria and programs to support postpartum care of women and their children.

Author contributions

BB: Writing–original draft. FS: Writing–review and editing. LM: Writing–review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Future Leader Fellowship Level 1 from the National Heart Foundation of Australia (LM, 106628). “NSW Cardiovascular Research Network (CVRN), the National Heart Foundation of Australia (BB, LM)” and “Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital Foundation (BB)”.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Alsnes I. V., Janszky I., Åsvold B. O., Økland I., Forman M. R., Vatten L. J. (2016). Maternal preeclampsia and androgens in the offspring around puberty: a follow-up study. PLoS One 11. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0167714

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alsnes I. V., Vatten L. J., Fraser A., Bjørngaard J. H., Rich-Edwards J., Romundstad P. R., et al. (2017). Hypertension in pregnancy and offspring cardiovascular risk in young adulthood: prospective and sibling studies in the HUNT study (Nord-Trøndelag health study) in Norway. Hypertension 69, 591–598. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.08414

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bakrania B. A., Spradley F. T., Drummond H. A., LaMarca B., Ryan M. J., Granger J. P. (2020). Preeclampsia: linking placental ischemia with maternal endothelial and vascular dysfunction. Compr. Physiol. 11, 1315–1349. doi:10.1002/cphy.c200008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bellamy L., Casas J.-P., Hingorani A. D., Williams D. J. (2007). Pre-eclampsia and risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer in later life: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 335, 974. doi:10.1136/bmj.39335.385301

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen H., Chhor M., Rayner B. S., McGrath K., McClements L. (2021). Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of current biomarkers in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Cardiovasc Dis. 114. doi:10.1016/j.acvd.2021.10.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dang F., Croy B. A., Stroman P. W., Figueiró-Filho E. A. (2016). Impactos da pré-eclâmpsia no cérebro de nascituros. Rev. Bras. Ginecol. Obstet. 38, 416–422. doi:10.1055/s-0036-1584515

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

deMartelly V., Dreixler J., Tung A., Mueller A., Heimberger S., Fazal A. A., et al. (2021). Long-term postpartum cardiac function and its association with preeclampsia. Comparative Study J. Am. Heart. Assoc. 10 (5), e018526. doi:10.1161/JAHA.120.018526

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ehrenstein V., Rothman K. J., Pedersen L., Hatch E. E., Sørensen H. T. (2009). Pregnancy-associated hypertensive disorders and adult cognitive function among Danish conscripts. Am. J. Epidemiol. 170, 1025–1031. doi:10.1093/aje/kwp223

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ghorbanpour S. M., Richards C., Pienaar D., Sesperez K., Aboulkheyr Es H., Nikolic V. N., et al. (2023). A placenta-on-a-chip model to determine the regulation of FKBPL and galectin-3 in preeclampsia. CMLS 80, 44. doi:10.1007/s00018-022-04648-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gumusoglu S. B., Chilukuri A. S. S., Santillan D. A., Santillan M. K., Stevens H. E. (2020). Neurodevelopmental outcomes of prenatal preeclampsia exposure. Trends Neurosci. 43, 253–268. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2020.02.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nahum Sacks K., Friger M., Shoham-Vardi I., Spiegel E., Sergienko R., Landau D., et al. (2018). Prenatal exposure to preeclampsia as an independent risk factor for long-term cardiovascular morbidity of the offspring. Pregnancy Hypertens. 13, 181–186. doi:10.1016/j.preghy.2018.06.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nour N. M. (2008). An introduction to maternal mortality. Rev. Obstet. Gynecol. 1.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Ogland B., Nilsen S. T., Forman M. R., Vatten L. J. (2011). Pubertal development in daughters of women with pre-eclampsia. Arch. Dis. Child. 96. doi:10.1136/adc.2009.178434

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Soma-Pillay P., Suleman F. E., Makin J. D., Pattinson R. C. (2017). Cerebral white matter lesions after pre-eclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens. 8. doi:10.1016/j.preghy.2017.02.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Theilen L. H., Fraser A., Hollingshaus M. S., Schliep K. C., Varner M. W., Smith K. R., et al. (2016). All-cause and cause-specific mortality after hypertensive disease of pregnancy. Obstetrics Gynecol. 128, 238–244. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001534

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang C., Baker P. N., Granger J. P., Davidge S. T., Tong C. (2023). Long-term impacts of preeclampsia on the cardiovascular system of mother and offspring. Hypertension 80. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.21061

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: preeclampsia, biomarkers, neurodevelopment, women’s health, post-partum, placenta

Citation: Bakrania BA, Spradley FT and McClements L (2024) Editorial: Adverse outcomes of preeclampsia: from mother to baby, pregnancy to postpartum. Front. Physiol. 15:1394120. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1394120

Received: 01 March 2024; Accepted: 11 March 2024;
Published: 08 April 2024.

Edited and reviewed by:

Ahsan H. Khandoker, Khalifa University, United Arab Emirates

Copyright © 2024 Bakrania, Spradley and McClements. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Bhavisha A. Bakrania, Yi5iYWtyYW5pYUB1cS5lZHUuYXU=

ORCID: Bhavisha A. Bakrania, orcid.org/0000-0002-2534-004X

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.