ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Physiol.

Sec. Exercise Physiology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1591132

Impact of Different Exercise Modalities on Neuroendocrine Well-being Markers Among University Students: A Study of Renalase and Catecholamine Responses

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty Sport Science, Fırat University, Elazig, Türkiye
  • 2School of Physical Education and Sports, Siirt University, Siirt, Türkiye
  • 3Department of Psychology and Health Sciences, Pegaso Telematic University, Naples, Italy
  • 4Department of Coaching Education, Faculty Sport Science, Fırat University, Elazig, Türkiye
  • 5Department of Human Sciences and Promotion of the Quality of Life, San Raffaele Rome Open University, Rome, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Catecholamines (epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine) and renalase are among the key biomolecules that regulate stress responses during exercise and support physiological adaptation. However, the effects of different exercise types on these biomolecules remain unclear. Aims to compare the effects of aerobic, anaerobic, and strength exercises on epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine, and renalase levels.Materials and Methods: This study was conducted using a pre-test post-test controlled experimental research design. A total of 80 healthy male participants aged 18–22 years were included and randomly assigned into four groups: control (C), aerobic exercise (A), anaerobic exercise (An), and strength training (Sa). The exercise groups followed specific training protocols for 8weeks, 3days per week, at the same time of the day under standardized environmental conditions. Venous blood samples were taken before and after the exercise program, and epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine, and renalase levels were analyzed using the ELISA method. Results: Significant increases in epinephrine, dopamine, and renalase levels were observed depending on the exercise type (p < 0.01), while norepinephrine levels showed a significant decrease only in the aerobic exercise group (p < 0.05). Epinephrine levels increased in the aerobic (36.96%), anaerobic (35.42%), strength training (27.45%) groups, while norepinephrine levels decreased only in the aerobic exercise group (6.38%). Dopamine levels increased in all exercise groups, with the highest change observed in the anaerobic exercise group (38.34%). Renalase levels increased in all exercise groups (p < 0.01), with the highest increase recorded in the anaerobic exercise group (29.42%).Conclusion: The increase in epinephrine, dopamine, and renalase levels suggests that regular exercise can support neuroendocrine adaptation. These findings may provide guidance for improving performance, managing stress, and individualizing training programs in athletes. This demonstrated that different exercise modalities induce specific neuroendocrine responses. All exercise types led to significant increases in epinephrine, dopamine, and renalase levels, with the most pronounced effects observed in the anaerobic exercise group. Strength training produced similarly robust responses. Norepinephrine levels showed a significant decrease only in the aerobic exercise group, while non-significant reductions were observed in the other exercise groups. These findings indicate that exercise type distinctly modulates hormonal and enzymatic pathways involved in physiological adaptation.

Keywords: exercise modalities, Catecholamines, renalase, Exercise, Well-being -

Received: 10 Mar 2025; Accepted: 22 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Çınar, Bağ, Aslan, Çınar, Gennaro, Akbulut and Migliaccio. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Gian Mario Migliaccio, Department of Human Sciences and Promotion of the Quality of Life, San Raffaele Rome Open University, Rome, Italy

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.