REVIEW article
Front. Physiol.
Sec. Exercise Physiology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1598149
This article is part of the Research TopicNeurophysiological Basis of the Relationship between Core Stability and Human Movement: Implications for Sport and RehabilitationView all articles
Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training in Elite versus Recreational Athletes
Provisionally accepted
- Henan University, Kaifeng, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Neuromuscular adaptations to resistance training drive strength and performance improvements, but differences between elite and recreational athletes remain underexplored. Understanding the underlying mechanisms can refine training approaches and enhance athletic development. This review synthesized findings from the past decade regarding how training status, age, sex, and genetics influence neuromuscular adaptations to resistance training, identified key gaps in the literature, and provided practical recommendations for tailoring training to different athletic levels. This critical review synthesized evidence on neuromuscular adaptations to resistance training, focusing on muscle hypertrophy, architectural changes, motor unit recruitment, neural drive, fiber-type transitions, and genetic influences. Methodological limitations and gaps were highlighted, with a focus on elite versus recreational populations. Muscle hypertrophy and strength gains occur rapidly in novices but plateau in advanced athletes, requiring more complex stimuli. Neural adaptations, including improved motor unit synchronization and reduced antagonist co-contraction, distinguish elite from recreational athletes. Genetic predispositions and training history further modulate adaptations. Fatigue, recovery, and injury risk differ between groups, underscoring the need for tailored monitoring and recovery strategies. Research gaps include inconsistent methodologies, limited elite athlete data, and underrepresentation of female cohorts. Future studies should integrate neurophysiological tools and long-term designs to clarify these mechanisms. Effective training requires adjusting intensity and volume based on an athlete's training status. Foundational strength programs benefit youth, while elite athletes require periodization and advanced methods. Policy-level support for supervised resistance training in youth can enhance performance and injury resilience. Addressing these insights can optimize training outcomes across athletic levels.
Keywords: Motor Unit Recruitment, Hypertrophy, periodization, Fatigue management, Athletic development
Received: 22 Mar 2025; Accepted: 27 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Aslam, Habyarimana and Bin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Shi Yong Bin, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.