ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Physiol.
Sec. Exercise Physiology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1622669
Comparative Effects of Recovery Strategies on Exercise-Induced Muscle Fatigue:A Randomized Controlled Trial
Provisionally accepted
- Shenyang Sport University, Shenyang, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: This study aimed to compare the effects of five post-exercise recovery interventions— massage, cold-water immersion(CWI), vibration therapy, functional electrical stimulation (FES), and static stretching—on central nervous modulation, neuromuscular function recovery, and inflammatory response following exercise-induced muscle fatigue (EIMF). Methods: This randomized controlled trial employed a two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA; group × time) to evaluate the effects of different recovery interventions over time. Thirty healthy male participants were randomly assigned to six groups (n = 5 each): massage (Group A), CWI (Group B), vibration therapy (Group C), static stretching (Group D), FES (Group E), and control (Group F). EIMF was induced using a standardized exercise model. Physiological and biochemical measurements were taken at baseline, immediately post-exercise, and at 24, 48, and 72 hours. Physiological indicators included muscle contraction time (TC), maximal radial displacement (DM),peak concentric power, The blood biochemical indicators include gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), creatine kinase (CK),and interleukin-6 (IL-6). Results: Vibration therapy demonstrated a significant advantage in reducing TC at 72 hours post-exercise(p = 0.027,p < 0.05);Although no statistically significant differences were found for DM,the massage group showed a more favorable recovery trend; FES significantly improved peak concentric power at 48 hours post-exercise (p = 0.000, p < 0.01).Massage significantly increased GABA levels (p = 0.001, p < 0.05) and reduced CK concentrations (p = 0.000, p < 0.01) at 48 hours.CWI demonstrated a significant inhibitory effect on IL-6 at 48 hours (p = 0.000, p < 0.01). Conclusion: Massage therapy showed favorable effects in central modulation and muscle repair. CWI effectively controlled acute inflammation. FES improved muscle explosive power, while vibration therapy enhanced neuromuscular responsiveness. Static stretching group showed no significant recovery benefit, as stretching primarily enhances ROM and flexibility and has only limited impact on the critical physiological pathways necessary for EIMF recovery.
Keywords: Exercise-induced muscle fatigue, Recovery and regeneration, Massage, Vibration therapy, cold-water immersion
Received: 04 May 2025; Accepted: 24 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wei, Shen and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Ming Wei, weiming2019@cupes.edu.cn
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.