REVIEW article
Front. Physiol.
Sec. Exercise Physiology
This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in Sports Science: Latest Findings and New Scientific Proposals- Volume IIIView all 23 articles
Effects of Three Strength Training Methods on Lower Extremity Strength, Jump and Sprint Performance: A Network Meta-Analysis
Provisionally accepted
- Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Weightlifting (WT) and Plyometric training (PT) may lead to comparable enhancements in strength, jump, and sprint performance. However, these two training modalities appear to differ significantly in their primary focus and underlying mechanisms. Objective: Examining the differences between WT and PT in improving lower extremity sports performance. Methods: A systematic search was conducted from five databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Elsevier, and Springer. Two authors developed specific inclusion and exclusion criteria to screen relevant literature based on the study objectives. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. We conducted both direct comparisons and network meta-analysis on the eligible studies. The assumptions of similarity, homogeneity, and consistency within the Bayesian network were also confirmed. Results: A total of 17 studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 394 participants. All studies were found to have a low or moderate risk of bias, with average score of 4.29. The Bayesian network meta-analysis showed no significant differences. According to the SUCRA rankings, TT was most likely to excel in squat jumps (SJ) (SUCRA = 0.76) and maximum strength (SUCRA = 0.95), WT for sprint (SUCRA = 0.77), and PT for countermovement jumps (SUCRA = 0.76). The tests of similarity, homogeneity and consistency of the network meta-analysis were also generally valid. The funnel plot and Egger regression tests indicated no publication bias. Conclusions: In summary, the WT programs are more effective at improving sprint performance by increasing power, while the PT programs improve jumping performance by improving the stretch-shortening cycle. PROSPERO registration number CRD 420250540130
Keywords: Olympic weightlifting, Plyometric training, Stretch-shortening cycle, strength, Jump, sprint
Received: 29 May 2025; Accepted: 28 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wang and Xiao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Tao Xiao, xiaotao@zzu.edu.cn
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.