Abstract
Introduction:
To oppose the aging-related cognitive and functional decline, the efficacy of different training methods has been tested, aiming body multisystemic adaptations. In this sense, Functional Training (FT) has shown relevant results in the physical fitness of older adults. However, little is known about its impact on older women with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
Objective:
To compare the effects of functional and aerobic training on cognitive function and functional fitness in older women with mild cognitive impairment.
Methods:
Sixty-eight older women completed a 16-week intervention through three groups: 1) Functional Training (FT: n = 28; mean age = 67.5 ± 4.8 years), 2) Aerobic Training (AT: n = 22; mean age = 66.3 ± 4.6 years), and 3) Control Group (CG: n = 18; mean age = 67.5 ± 4.6 years). The training sessions did occur three times per week, with a duration of 50 min per session for both exercised groups. The training load was quantified daily in the FT group. Cognitive function, serum levels of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF), and functional fitness were assessed pre- and post-intervention.
Results:
FT and AT groups showed improvements in cognitive status (FT: d = 0.99, p ≤ 0.001; AT: d = 0.97, p ≤ 0.001) and semantic memory (FT: d = 0.95, p < 0.001; AT: d = 0.97, p < 0.001); however, only FT led to improvements in executive function (d = 0.63, p = 0.043) and increased serum BDNF levels (d = 0.95, p = 0.011). Regarding functional fitness, both groups showed improvements in gait and stand up ability, as well as cardiorespiratory fitness. However, only FT improved dexterity and upper limb strength. No statistically significant differences were observed between the FT and AT groups in the measured outcomes.
Conclusion:
Both FT and AT improve cognitive function and functional fitness in older women with mild cognitive impairment. However, in addition to eliciting a greater magnitude of effects on some outcomes, FT was the only intervention to modulate peripheral BDNF concentration.
1 Introduction
Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is an intermediate state between normal cognitive aging and dementia, characterized by changes that do not significantly affect daily activities. In turn, it hinders the cognitive functions involved in the acquisition, processing, storage, and use of information, with an annual conversion to dementia of approximately 15% (). This cognitive decline is associated with a reduction in brain density and volume of approximately 2.82% over a 6-month period (), which impairs the connectivity and expression of neurotrophins involved in neuroplasticity, such as Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) (; ), compromising cognitive function (; ). This condition is prevalent in older women due to their longer life expectancy and the reduction in sex hormone production during the post-menopausal period (). Furthermore, this decline can be accelerated by factors such as arterial hypertension, obesity, and physical inactivity (; ).
Physical exercise stands as the foremost non-pharmacological strategy to counteract physical inactivity (; ). Exposure to aerobic exercise enhances cardiorespiratory capacity and cerebral vascularization (), thereby increasing the supply of oxygen and nutrients to neural cells (). This, in turn, leads to greater cerebral connectivity (), improving learning () and decelerating cognitive decline (; ). In parallel, neuromuscular stimuli continuously activate areas involved in motor planning and execution (), consequently impacting cerebral connectivity (; ). Both types of stimuli promote the release of myokines, interleukins, and neurotrophins, fostering positive adaptations from exercise practice (; ; ; ; ; ; ). The integration of physical and motor components demonstrably improves global cognition, language, executive function, attention, and concentration (; ; ; ; ). In healthy older adults, a positive association exists between physical activity levels and cognitive function, alongside enhanced task performance. These benefits can be further amplified in older adults with MCI (; ).
Among various modalities, functional training (FT) is a multicomponent, multiplanar, and multiarticular approach that emphasizes activities of daily living and leverages the principle of specificity (). This is achieved by applying stimuli that develop muscular strength and power in basic functional patterns, such as pushing, pulling, carrying, and squatting. Additionally, the session incorporates acceleration and deceleration exercises, typically organized into blocks (; Antonio Gomes De and Marzo). FT demonstrates significant effects on physical fitness, with effect sizes ranging from moderate to large (; ). However, its impacts on the cognitive function of older adults with MCI are not yet fully elucidated (). Prospective studies suggest incorporating motor complexity and dose control into FT protocols as an alternative to induce cognitive adaptations ().
On the other hand, Aerobic Training (AT) is considered an effective intervention in the prevention and treatment of cognitive impairments by stimulating the release of myokines and increasing cerebral blood flow. Different types of AT demonstrate promising effects on cognition in older adults with MCI, such as continuous walking (; ), high-intensity interval training (HIIT) ()), and rhythmic training (). However, these protocols show a smaller magnitude of effect on the physical fitness of older adults when compared to neuromuscular training methods (; ). Furthermore, it is believed that appropriate levels of muscle strength and power are associated with better overall cognitive performance and in its subdomains ().
Therefore, our study compared the effects of functional and aerobic training on cognitive function, serum BDNF levels, and functional fitness in older women with mild cognitive impairment. Additionally, the present intervention proposal has novel characteristics not yet evidenced and a precise quantification of the training load throughout the intervention period. Our initial hypothesis was that FT is as effective as AT to improve the cognitive function; however, it provides greater effects on functional fitness and in increasing peripheral BDNF levels.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Study design
This was a 22-week randomized controlled trial. Physical and cognitive assessments were conducted over a 4-week period: 2 weeks before the intervention and 2 weeks after the intervention, to collect pre- and post-intervention data. Additionally, 2 weeks were dedicated to familiarizing the participants with the exercises, and 16 weeks were allocated for the implementation of the training protocols (Figure 1).
FIGURE 1
2.2 Participants
The participants were recruited from the community using leaflets and flyers distributed around the Federal University of Sergipe, through a non-probability sampling method (Figure 2). To detect between-group differences with an alpha level of 0.05 and assuming a large effect size, we would need a total of 45 participants in our study to achieve a power of 0.80. Notably, we considered a 20% sample loss during the intervention, totaling 54 participants. We randomized the participants based on the residual value of the means of all performed tests, which were organized in ascending order for every three values using Microsoft Excel software.
FIGURE 2
The selection process for participants followed several inclusion criteria: 1) female sex; 2) physically independence; 3) being literate; 4) not involved in any hormone replacement therapy; 5) scoring >8 and <26 points on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (); 6) reporting complaints of memory problems (); and 7) without diagnosed neurological diseases (dementia, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis, and depression), recent surgeries, vision, hearing, musculoskeletal, and cardiorespiratory problems that would prevent the practice of high-intensity physical exercise. Participants with an attendance rate below 70% in the training sessions and those who did not attend the final assessment were excluded from the study analyses.
After the application of the eligibility criteria, the participants signed the Free and Informed Consent Form. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the institution’s Research Ethics Committee (CAAE: 76026223.4.0000.5546; No. 6,598,301). Furthermore, it is registered in the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials under protocol RBR-89svjw3 (available at https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-89svjw3).
2.3 Physical training protocols
Three weekly sessions were conducted, each lasting approximately 50 min, over a period of 16 weeks, totaling 48 trainings sessions, with a minimum interval of 48 h between sessions. Both training protocols were supervised by experienced physical training professionals for older adults. There was one professional for every five participants to ensure safety and correct exercise execution.
2.3.1 Functional training
The sessions were composed of three parts: 1) preparation for movement with joint mobility exercises (glenohumeral, thoracic, hip, and ankle) and muscle activation (static marching and squats); 2) stimuli directed at speed, coordination, agility, and muscle power; and 3) exercises focused on muscle strength in basic functional patterns of pushing, pulling, carrying, and squatting, which reflect activities of daily living. Both blocks, 2 and 3, were performed in a circuit format (Table 1).
TABLE 1
| Session structure | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mobility and activation | (Cervical) – Frontal flexion and extension, abduction and adduction | ||
| (Glenohumeral) – Horizontal flexion, extension and shoulder flexion, rotation | |||
| (Thorax/Hip) – Shoulder protraction and retraction, unilateral thorax abduction; Trunk flexion, alternating leg raises, hip circumduction | |||
| (Knee/Ankle) – Forward step, dorsiflexion and plantarflexion, squat | |||
| (Coordination) – Knee raises with contralateral hand touches, adding counting rhythm and pause | |||
| (Muscle and Cognitive Activation) – Simple multidirectional movement patterns with term correlation | |||
| Total time | 10 min total, 01 set with 10 repetitions per exercise | ||
| Exercise progression | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sessions | 01–16 | 17–32 | 33–48 |
| Neuromuscular 01 (Circuit Format) | Parallel stance and straight throw against the wall | Parallel stance and throw to the ground | Parallel stance and upward throw with jump |
| Forward jump | Jump with diagonal entry | Lateral jump (gallop) | |
| Forward entry with one foot in each square at a time | Forward stepping with lateral displacement | Forward entry and bilateral exit with forward jumps (Hopscotch) | |
| Forward displacement with cone touch | Lateral displacement with change of direction touching the cone with a jump | Lateral and forward displacement with jumps over cones | |
| Vertical waves with the battle rope | Horizontal waves with the battle rope | Alternating vertical waves with the battle rope | |
| 5-m forward sprint | Bipedal jump with 10-m sprint | Asymmetrical foot jumps with 10-m sprint | |
| Total time | 15 min total, 06 exercises, 2 rounds, 75 s per station, work-to-rest ratio 1/2 | ||
| Neuromuscular 02 (circuit format) | Front Squat (Load) | Front Squat (Load) | Front Squat (Load) |
| Neutral Grip Suspension Trainer Row | Alternating Grip (Neutral and Supinated) Row | Alternating Grip (Pronated and Supinated) Row | |
| Bilateral Hip Thrust | Bilateral Hip Thrust with Simultaneous Bilateral Push-Off | Unilateral Hip Thrust | |
| Pull-up | Pull-up with Alternating Knee Raise on the Eccentric Phase | Pull-up with Leg Extension and Ipsilateral Touch on the Supporting Leg | |
| Bilateral Deadlift (Load) | Bilateral Deadlift (Load) | Bilateral Deadlift (Load) | |
| Bilateral Farmer’s Walk | Bilateral Loaded Farmer’s Walk in Zig-Zag Pattern | Unilateral Loaded Farmer’s Walk in Zig-Zag Pattern | |
| Supinated Grip Resistance Band Pull-down | Bilateral Pull-down with Squat on the Eccentric Phase | Bilateral Pull-down with Contralateral Leg Flexion | |
| Total time | 25 min total, 07 exercises, 2 rounds of 8 to 12 repetitions, 100 s per station, work-to-rest ratio 2/1 | ||
Description of the session structure and progressions implemented during the 16 weeks of Functional Training.
Exercises complexity progressions occurred every 16 sessions. In the second part, this was achieved through variations in planes (sagittal, frontal, and transverse) and direction of movement (vertical, horizontal, and diagonal). In the third part, progression explored motor complexity by altering the number of segments and planes, with dual motor tasks associated with increments in movement speed (; ). The participants underwent supervised and progressive training, with daily quantification of the load (Volume load = sets x repetitions x load) for the eight exercises of the neuromuscular part (; ).
2.3.2 Aerobic training
The applied systematization possesses particularities not yet evidenced in scientific literature, such as the combination of three training methods within the same session, aiming for improvements in agility, balance, coordination, speed, and cardiorespiratory fitness. Thus, the session was divided into four parts: 1) preparation for movement with joint mobility exercises (glenohumeral, thoracic, hip, and ankle) and muscle activation (static marching and squats); 2) continuous running (50% and 70% of heart rate reserve; HRR); 3) rhythmic movements; and 4) high-intensity interval running ().
There were no progressions during the weeks; however, the intensity of the session was prescribed between 50% and 80% of HRR, being monitored throughout the session, allowing for the tracking of the average HRR behavior during the parts of the sessions () (Table 2).
TABLE 2
| Session structure | Exercises | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mobility And Activation | (Cervical) – Frontal flexion and extension, abduction and adduction | ||
| (Glenohumeral) – Horizontal flexion, extension and shoulder flexion, rotation | |||
| (Thorax/Hip) – Shoulder protraction and retraction, unilateral thorax abduction; Trunk flexion, alternating leg raises, hip circumduction | |||
| (Knee/Ankle) – Forward step, dorsiflexion and plantarflexion, squat | |||
| (Coordination) – Knee raises with contralateral hand touches, adding counting rhythm and pause | |||
| (Muscle and Cognitive Activation) – Simple multidirectional movement patterns with term correlation | |||
| Total time | 10 min total, 01 set with 10 repetitions per exercise | ||
| Continuous part | Continuous running in a corridor | ||
| Total time | 10 min total, 70-m course (70m ±20 s) | ||
| Movements performed | |||
| Rhythmic part | Backward step | Forward step | Lateral step |
| Backward kick | Forward kick | Lateral kick | |
| Knee flexion | |||
| Leg curl | |||
| Arm flexion | Leg flexion | ||
| Total time | 10 min, 10 sets of 8 repetitions per movement | ||
| Interval part | 30 Sprints – 12 m | ||
| Total time | 10 min, 12 m (01 sprint ±03 s), work-to-rest ratio 1/4 | ||
| 130, 140 and 150 - Beats Per Minute (Music) (Rhythmic Part) | |||
| 05 to 08 – Rating of Perceived Exertion (Session) | |||
| 50%–70% Heart Rate Reserve (Session) | |||
Description of the Aerobic Training session.
2.3.3 Control group
The control group performed static and dynamic stretching exercises. The exercises began with the muscles of the neck and progressed down to the dorsum of the feet. The session duration was approximately 40 min, with 10 min dedicated to preparation for movement with joint mobility exercises (glenohumeral, thoracic, hip, and ankle) and 30 min devoted to the practice of submaximal stretches, respecting the comfort levels of the participants.
2.4 Data collection procedures
Initially, the participants underwent an eligibility assessment, and information such as age, body weight, height, address, motivation, medication use, and chronic diseases was recorded. For the cognitive and physical tests, all measurements were performed by trained and experienced professionals in the data collection procedures, which always occurred in the morning period. The assessors were blinded to the physical training protocols previously performed by the participants.
2.4.1 Categorization instruments
The participants were functionally classified based on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) questionnaire (), the Geriatric Depression Scale and Anxiety Scale (GDS-15) (), and the Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale ().
2.4.2 Cognitive assessment
The tests were administered at pre- and post-intervention time points in a closed room, free from visual or auditory distractions, with controlled temperature (23 °C ± 2 °C), and with a single investigator in the room to provide instructions and evaluate the participants. The application of the cognitive tests lasted approximately 30 min, following a pre-established order of administration. To assess the impact of the intervention on cognitive function, the following cognitive tests were administered at pre- and post-intervention time points:
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), with a maximum score of 30 points, was used to evaluate overall cognitive status. The MoCA was also used for screening mild cognitive impairment (MCI), demonstrating a high intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC = 0.88). Reference values for classifying cognitive impairment are scores above 8 points and below 26 points, with a sensitivity exceeding 80% (; ).
Animal category verbal fluency was employed to assess semantic memory, language, and executive function. This test is widely used in neuropsychological assessments due to its recognized sensitivity for screening MCI and dementia (; ). The verbal fluency test is validated for the Brazilian population, exhibiting moderate to high intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC >0.8) and a sensitivity greater than 79% (; ).
Finally, the Digit Span Forward (DSF) test was administered to assess short-term memory. In contrast, the Digit Span Backward (DSB) test evaluated working memory, where participants had to repeat numerical sequences in reverse order (). Both versions demonstrated a high intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC = 0.88) and a sensitivity above 70% (). These tests have proven efficacy in detecting declines in short-term memory and working memory, respectively ().
2.4.3 Functional fitness assessment
The tests comprising the functional fitness assessment were performed in a randomized order on the same day for all participants. Each test included a familiarization trial followed by three recorded attempts, with a 2-min rest interval between attempts. The investigators provided verbal encouragement during the execution of the tests and additional explanations when necessary. Participants were instructed to perform all tests with maximum effort to select the best value among the three attempts. The tests comprising the functional fitness assessment were time-based and recorded using a digital stopwatch.
2.4.3.1 Stand up ability
Two tests were used to assess chair-rise ability: 1) Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (FSTS), which indirectly evaluated lower limb power, with participants sitting down and standing up from a 45 cm high chair for five consecutive repetitions (); 2) Floor Rise Test (FRT), which evaluated overall functionality with high demand on core muscles, with the participant rising from a prone position to a standing position without swaying ().
2.4.3.2 Gait ability
Two tests were used to assess gait ability: 1) Timed Up and Go (TUG), which evaluated agility and dynamic balance, where the participant stood up from a chair, walked 3 m, turned around a cone, and returned to the seat (); 2) 10-m Walk Test (10MWT), which evaluated gait speed, with the participant walking 10 m of a 14-m course, excluding the acceleration and deceleration areas ().
2.4.3.3 Dexterity ability
Two tests were used to assess dexterity ability: 1) Gallon Jug Shelf Transfer (GJST), which evaluated upper limb strength and coordination by transferring five gallons of 3.9 kg between a lower and an upper shelf, transferring 1 gallon at a time (); and 2) Dressing on and taking off a t-shirt (DTTS), which evaluated upper limb mobility and coordination, with the participant donning and doffing a shirt as quickly as possible ().
2.4.3.4 Upper limb strength
Handgrip strength (HGS), which assessed the muscular strength of the upper limbs, was measured using a handgrip dynamometer (Jamar Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer; Homecraft Ltd., ghamshire, United Kingdom), in conjunction with the functional fitness tests (). The participant was seated in a chair and applied progressive maximal force with the dominant arm flexed at 90°. The highest value in kilogram-force (kgf) was selected for analysis.
2.4.3.5 Cardiorespiratory capacity
The 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), which assessed the cardiorespiratory capacity of the participants, was administered separately from the other tests in a covered and ventilated multi-sport court marked with 30-m lanes. Upon the command (“Go”), the participant walked as fast as possible for 6 min, with only one attempt performed. At the end, the distance covered was recorded in meters ().
2.4.3.6 Blood collection and BDNF measurement
Blood samples were collected after a 12-h overnight fast and 72 h of exercise abstinence. Samples were drawn from the antecubital vein (4 mL) into vacuum blood collection tubes (Vacutainer®; Becton Dickinson®, Franklin Lakes, United States), centrifuged (3,000 rpm, 10 min at 4 °C), and stored at −80 °C. Serum BDNF levels were measured using a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with a detection range of 0.066–16 ng/mL (Human BDNF ELISA kit - cat# EH42RB, Thermo Fisher Scientific Company, United States) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
2.4.4 Statistical analysis
The sample size calculation was performed using the G*Power software (Erdfelder, Faul and Buchner, 1996; Kiel, Germany - version 3.1.9.2) based on the main dependent variables: 1) cognitive function - semantic memory and cognitive status (; ); 2) functional fitness–dynamic balance and cardiorespiratory capacity (). Thus, a statistical power of 0.80 and an alpha of 0.05 were considered, in addition to an anticipated sample loss of 20% during the intervention.
The data were tabulated and analyzed using JAMOVI software (version 2.4.11). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the general characteristics of the study participants. The normality of the data was confirmed using the Shapiro-Wilk test, and homogeneity of variances was verified using Levene’s test.
Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to verify the differences between the interventions. The Bonferroni post hoc test was used to identify where the significance occurred. All tests were two-tailed, and the effect size (ES) was calculated according to the equation proposed by Cohen (1988), as well as the classification of each result (trivial: 0.00-0.19; small: 0.20-0.49; moderate: 0.5-0.79; large: 0.8-1.33; and very large: >1.33). The significance level adopted for all tests was p < 0.05.
2.5 Results
The initial sample consisted of 89 older women (mean age = 67.1 ± 4.7 years; BMI = 29.29 ± 4.94 kg/m2) at risk for MCI (MoCA: 19.32 ± 3.73 points), independent in activities of daily living (IADL: 20.61 ± 0.86 points), and with a low indicative risk of depression (GDS-15: 2.46 ± 1.39). Of these, 68 completed all stages of the intervention, and the experimental groups showed a 91% adherence rate to the training sessions (Table 3).
TABLE 3
| Varibles | FT (n = 28) | AT (n = 22) | CG (n = 18) | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M ± SD | M ± SD | M ± SD | ||
| Age (years) | 67.5 ± 4.8 | 66.4 ± 4.6 | 67.5 ± 4.6 | 0.680 |
| Body weight (Kg) | 68.2 ± 11.3 | 66.0 ± 14.4 | 67.9 ± 15.6 | 0.845 |
| Height (meters) | 1.53 ± 6.88 | 1.50 ± 4.91 | 1.50 ± 5.05 | 0.171 |
| BMI (Kg/m3) | 29.29 ± 4.39 | 28.71 ± 4.68 | 29.07 ± 6.13 | 0.775 |
| MoCA | 18.64 ± 3.69 | 19.95 ± 3.75 | 19.61 ± 3.79 | 0.446 |
| IADL | 20.52 ± 0.96 | 20.79 ± 0.53 | 20.56 ± 0.98 | 0.428 |
| GDS-15 | 2.50 ± 1.58 | 2.52 ± 1.12 | 2.33 ± 1.45 | 0.899 |
| Years of education | 7.5 ± 3.2 | 8.6 ± 3.8 | 7.6 ± 4.7 | 0.659 |
| Medical History | ||||
| Diabetes | 13 (46%) | 08 (40%) | 09 (50%) | 0.624 |
| Hypertension | 18 (64%) | 13 (65%) | 13 (72%) | 0.738 |
| Dyslipidemia | 20 (71%) | 12 (60%) | 13 (72%) | 0.270 |
| Medications | ||||
| 0 | 03 (10%) | 03 (13%) | 00 (00%) | 0.180 |
| ≤ 3 | 15 (53%) | 12 (54%) | 7 (38%) | 0.560 |
| > 3 | 10 (35%) | 07 (31%) | 11 (61%) | 0.151 |
Baseline Characteristics of participants in the Functional Training (FT), Aerobic (AT), and Control (CG) groups.
Note: Values are presented as mean and standard deviation (M ± SD). MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; GDS15 – Geriatric Depression Scale; IADL, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living; BMI, Body Mass Index. One-way ANOVA.
In FT, the volume-load demonstrates that the training load was progressive throughout the 16 weeks (Figure 3A). Conversely, the monitoring of HRres demonstrates that an intensity between 50% and 80% was maintained during the AT sessions (Figure 3B).
FIGURE 3
Following the 16-week intervention period, we observed a significant group*time interaction for cognitive status (MoCA) (F (2, 65) = 3.16; η2 = 0.010; p = 0.035), with no significant group effect (F (2, 65) = 0.910; η2 = 0.020; p = 0.408) but a significant time effect (F (2, 65) = 89.68; η2 = 0.143; p ≤ 0.001). Upon comparing time points, we detected a large effect size increase in both the FT and AT groups compared to baseline values (FT: d = 0.99; p ≤ 0.001/AT: d = 0.97; p ≤ 0.001). However, the CG showed no significant difference despite a moderate effect size (d = 0.51; p > 0.05) (Figure 4A).
FIGURE 4
Regarding the peripheral quantification of BDNF, we found a significant group*time interaction (F (2, 37) = 9.07; η2 = 0.102; p ≤ 0.001), with no significant group effect (F (2, 37) = 0.518; η2 = 0.018; p = 0.606) and no significant time effect (F (2, 37) = 0.079; η2 = 0.002; p = 0.790). Upon further exploration of the results, we only detected a large effect size increase in the FT group compared to baseline values (d = 0.95; p < 0.011). Furthermore, when comparing post-test time points, we observed a difference with a large effect size between the FT and CG groups (d = 0.96; p = 0.026) (Figure 4B).
Regarding cognitive function, for which the analyzed variables may influence performance, we observed no significant differences between the groups for short-term memory (DSF), working memory (DSB), semantic memory (FV_QAni), and executive function (FV_QAgru). However, FT showed an improvement with a moderate to large effect size compared to baseline values in semantic memory (d = 0.95; p < 0.001) and executive function (d = 0.63; p = 0.043). In contrast, AT demonstrated an improvement with a large effect size compared to baseline values only for semantic memory (d = 0.97; p < 0.001). The CG showed no adaptations for any of the cognitive variables (Table 4).
TABLE 4
| Variables Assessment Time Points | FT (n = 28) | AT (n = 22) | CG (n = 18) | p-value Interaction Group-time | FT vs. CG | At vs. CG | FT vs. AT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digit Span - Forward (DSF) | |||||||
| Baseline (pre) | 16.68 ± 3.97 | 16.00 ± 3.45 | 16.06 ± 2.99 | ||||
| Post_16_week | 16.50 ± 4.38 | 17.64 ± 4.11 | 14.88 ± 3.12 | 0.009 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Δ% - ES | −1.08 – 0.05T | +10.25–0.43S | −7.35 – 0.39S | ||||
| CI (95%) | (15.05–18.15) | (15.05–18.60) | (14.90–18.80) | ||||
| Digit Span – Backward (DSB) | |||||||
| Baseline (pre) | 6.89 ± 2.48 | 7.14 ± 3.18 | 6.89 ± 3.08 | ||||
| Post_16_week | 8.00 ± 2.68 | 8.41 ± 3.36 | 7.22 ± 2.98 | 0.424 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Δ% - ES | +16.11–0.43S | +17.79–0.39S | +4.78–0.11T | ||||
| CI (95%) | (6.33–8.55) | (6.52–9.02) | (5.67–8.44) | ||||
| Verbal Fluency – category animals (number of animals) – VF_Nani | |||||||
| Baseline (pre) | 13.64 ± 4.04 | 14.73 ± 4.70 | 14.11 ± 4.68 | ||||
| Post_16_week | 17.57 ± 4.20* | 19.14 ± 4.37* | 16.06 ± 4.37 | 0.173 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Δ% - ES | +28.81–0.95L | +29.94–0.97L | +13.82–0.43S | ||||
| CI (95%) | (13.95–17.30) | (15.00–18.85) | (13.90–18.15) | ||||
| Verbal Fluency – category animals (number of clusters) – VF_NClus | |||||||
| Baseline (pre) | 1,39 ± 1.34 | 1.68 ± 1.32 | 1.50 ± 1.34 | ||||
| Post_16_week | 2.25 ± 1.40* | 2.32 ± 1.46 | 2.06 ± 1.21 | 0.822 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Δ% - ES | +65.25–0.63M | +38.10–0.46S | +37.33–0.44S | ||||
| CI (95%) | (1.31–2.33) | (1.41–2.57) | (1.13–2.41) | ||||
Effects of functional and aerobic training on short-term memory, working memory, semantic memory, and executive function in older women with mild cognitive impairment.
Note: Values are presented as mean and standard deviation (M ± SD); p ≤ 0.05 (pre/post). Δ%: Percentage change between Baseline (pre) and Post_16. wks: Weeks. ES: Effect Size (TTrivial: 0.0-0.19; SSmall: 0.2-0.49; MModerate: 0.5-0.79; LLarge: 0.8-1.32; VLVery, Large: >1.33). CI – Confidence Interval.
The * indicates the statistical difference when the p-value ≤ 0.05 in the pre- and post-values. The # indicates the statistical difference between the post-time points.
Regarding cardiorespiratory fitness (6MWT), we observed differences between the groups (FT/CG: p = 0.008; AT/CG: p = 0.041). When compared to baseline, we found an increase in the distance covered for both the FT and AT groups with a moderate effect size (FT: d = 0.66; p = 0.002/AT: d = 0.56; p = 0.036). In the CG, we observed a non-significant reduction with a small effect size (d = 0.35; p = 0.464). Regarding upper limb strength (ULS), we observed no significant differences between the groups. However, when considering changes from baseline, only the FT group showed an increase in handgrip strength in kilogram-force with a moderate effect size (d = 0.64; p ≤ 0.001) (Table 5).
TABLE 5
| Variables Assessment Time Points | FT (n = 28) | AT (n = 22) | CG (n = 18) | p-value Interaction Group-time | FT vs. CG | At vs. CG | FT vs. AT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Six-Minute Walk Test - 6MWT (meters) | |||||||
| Baseline (pre) | 481.27 ± 61.56 | 479.43 ± 73.31 | 474.94 ± 78.16 | ||||
| Post_16_week | 525.37 ± 71.77* | 517.05 ± 58.98* | 445.87 ± 85.58 | 0.001 | 0.008 | 0.041 | 1.00 |
| Δ% - ES | +9.16–0.66M | +7.85–0.56M | −6.12 – 0.35S | ||||
| CI (95%) | (476.00 – 530.50) | (468.00–528.50) | (427.00–494.00) | ||||
| Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test – FTSST (seconds) | |||||||
| Baseline (pre) | 8.26 ± 1.97 | 8.00 ± 1.71 | 7.91 ± 2.37 | ||||
| Post_16_week | 7.12 ± 1.77* | 7.33 ± 1.55* | 8.14 ± 2.26 | 0.001 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Δ% - ES | +13.80–0.61M | +8.37–0.41S | −8.14 – 0.10T | ||||
| CI (95%) | (6.97–8.42) | (6.85–8.49) | (7.12–8.93) | ||||
| Floor Rise Test – FRT (seconds) | |||||||
| Baseline (pré) | 3.81 ± 0.96 | 3.91 ± 1.00 | 3.77 ± 0.86 | ||||
| Pós_16_sem | 3.03 ± 0.60* | 3.33 ± 0.97* | 4.04 ± 0.97 | 0.001 | 0.003 | 0.161 | 1.00 |
| Δ% - ES | +20.47–0.97L | +14.83–0.59M | −7.16 – 0.29S | ||||
| CI (95%) | (3.08–3.76) | (3.23–4.01) | (3.48–4.33) | ||||
| Timed Up and Go – TUG (seconds) | |||||||
| Baseline (pre) | 7.57 ± 1.00 | 7.36 ± 0.72 | 7.52 ± 0.91 | ||||
| Post_16_week | 6.92 ± 0.88* | 6.95 ± 0.80* | 7.68 ± 1.07 | 0.001 | 0.114 | 0.210 | 1.00 |
| Δ% - ES | +8.58–0.69M | +5.57–0.54M | −2.12 – 0.16T | ||||
| CI (95%) | (6.91–7.59) | (6.77–7.54) | (7.18–8.03) | ||||
| 10-m Walk Test - 10MWT (seconds) | |||||||
| Baseline (pre) | 5.17 ± 0.64 | 5.21 ± 0.62 | 5.32 ± 0.64 | ||||
| Post_16_week | 4.85 ± 0.50* | 4.85 ± 0.44* | 5.23 ± 0.54 | 0.093 | 0.079 | 0.232 | 1.00 |
| Δ% - ES | +6.19–0.56M | +6.91–0.67M | +1.69–0.15T | ||||
| CI (95%) | (4.78–5.22) | (4.80–5.27) | (5.01–5.54) | ||||
| Gallon Jug Shelf Transfer – GJST (seconds) | |||||||
| Baseline (pre) | 10.34 ± 1.06 | 10.56 ± 0.97 | 10.87 ± 1.29 | ||||
| Post_16_week | 9.74 ± 1.00* | 10.06 ± 1.01 | 10.97 ± 1.34 | 0.018 | 0.007 | 0.176 | 1.00 |
| Δ% - ES | +5.80–0.58M | +4.73–0.51M | −0.91 – 0.04T | ||||
| CI (95%) | (9.60–10.50) | (9.81–10.80) | (10.36–11.50) | ||||
| Dressing on and taking off a t-shirt – DTTS (seconds) | |||||||
| Baseline (pre) | 13.65 ± 2.72 | 13.21 ± 2.39 | 13.31 ± 1.99 | ||||
| Post_16_week | 12.00 ± 2.03* | 12.64 ± 2.59 | 13.19 ± 1.97 | 0.003 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Δ% - ES | +12.09–0.69 M | +4.31–0.23 S | +0.90–0.06 T | ||||
| CI (95%) | (11.95–13.70) | (11.95–13.95) | (12.20–14.35) | ||||
| Handgrip Strength – HGS (kilogram) | |||||||
| Baseline (pre) | 22.20 ± 3.93 | 21.79 ± 4.67 | 22.76 ± 4.41 | ||||
| Post_16_week | 24.81 ± 4.21* | 22.66 ± 3.98 | 22.52 ± 4.21 | 0.001 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Δ% - ES | +11.75–0.64M | +3.99–0.20S | −1.05 – 0.05T | ||||
| CI (95%) | (22.05–25.20) | (20.45–24.00) | (20.65–24.65) | ||||
Effects of Functional and Aerobic Training on Functional Fitness for activities of daily living in older women with mild cognitive impairment.
Note: Values are presented as mean and standard deviation (M ± SD); p ≤ 0.05 (pre/post). Δ%: Percentage change between Baseline (pre) and Post_16 (% change = 100×final−initial∣initial∣% change = 100×∣initial∣final−initial). wks: Weeks. +: performance improvement. -: performance reduction. ES: Effect Size (TTrivial: 0.0-0.19; SSmall: 0.2-0.49; MModerate: 0.5-0.79; LLarge: 0.8-1.32; VLVery, Large: >1.33). CI – Confidence Interval.
The * indicates the statistical difference when the p-value ≤ 0.05 in the pre- and post-values. The # indicates the statistical difference between the post-time points.
For the tests assessing functional fitness involving the stand up ability to rise from a chair (FTSST) and gait speed (GS), we observed a difference between the groups only for GS (FT/CG: d = 1.25; p = 0.003). When compared to baseline values, both intervention groups improved the time to complete the task in the FTSST (FT: d = 0.61; p ≤ 0.001/AT: d = 0.41; p = 0.021) and GS (FT: d = 0.97; p ≤ 0.001/AT: d = 0.59; p ≤ 0.001), with effect sizes ranging from small to large. The CG showed no adaptations following the intervention (Table 5).
Consistently, regarding walking ability, TUG and 10MWT, we observed no significant differences between the groups. When compared to baseline values, both intervention groups reduced the time to complete the task in the TUG (FT: d = 0.69; p ≤ 0.001/AT: d = 0.54; p = 0.022) and similarly for the 10MWT (FT: d = 0.56; p ≤ 0.001/AT: d = 0.67; p = 0.011), with moderate effect sizes. The CG showed no adaptations following the intervention (Table 5).
Finally, regarding the tests related to dexterity, GJST and DTTS, we observed differences between the groups only for GJST (FT/CG: d = 1.04; p = 0.007) with a large effect size. When compared to baseline values, only the FT group reduced the time for task completion in the GJST (d = 0.58; p = 0.004) and similarly for the DTTS (d = 0.69; p ≤ 0.001), both with a moderate effect size. The AT and CG showed no adaptations following the intervention (Table 5).
2.6 Discussion
The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of 16 weeks of FT and AT on cognitive function, functional fitness, and serum BDNF levels in older women with mild cognitive impairment. Our main finding was that both training protocols promoted consistent improvements in cognitive state and semantic memory. However, only FT improved executive function and increased peripheral BDNF concentration. Regarding functional fitness, we observed larger effect sizes in the ability to stand up and in tasks involving manual dexterity, as well as specifically in handgrip strength, thus confirming our initial hypothesis.
The multisystem adaptations resulting from the combination of multicomponent stimuli with movement specificity for daily activities, together with the individualization and progression of the training load, have been previously evidenced by our group (; ; ). The present study provides a consistent investigation into the effects of physical training on cognitive function and quantification of the training load, which suggests the absence of adaptive stagnation throughout the intervention.
Regarding cognitive status, significant effects with a large effect size (FT: d = 0.99; AT: d = 0.97) were observed for both training protocols. These findings likely stem from the positive adaptation of cardiorespiratory capacity, which is directly linked to enhanced cerebral vascularization (; ; ). This adaptation promotes increased connectivity between brain regions (), enhancing learning () and attenuate cognitive decline (). Our results are consistent with previous studies in older adults with MCI (; ). Furthermore, improvements caused by the FT protocol may be related to visuospatial stimuli () and the motor complexity of the exercises (). These stimuli may positively favor the availability of oxygen and nutrients to neural cells (), with continuous activation of areas related to movement planning and execution ().
Executive function is crucial for problem-solving and the planning of cognitive or motor tasks. It comprises working memory, cognitive flexibility, and inhibitory control, all of which independently contribute to executive function (). Only the FT protocol showed significant effects on executive function with a moderate effect size (FT: d = 0.63), which can be attributed to the motor demands of the neuromuscular-dominant block, combined with the high volume of multi-joint and multi-planar exercises. This requires more planning when compared to the rhythmic movements used in the AT protocol with a small effect size (AT: d = 0.46) (). Consequently, greater activation of areas responsible for motor planning, such as the supplementary motor area, premotor cortex, cerebellum, and basal ganglia, is expected (; ; ).
Specifically, regarding short-term memory (DSF) (FT: d = 0.05; AT: d = 0.43) and working memory (DSB) (FT: d = 0.43; AT: d = 0.39), no significant adaptations were observed for any of the groups, with effect sizes ranging from trivial to small. The ineffectiveness of both FT and AT may stem from the absence of specific short-term memory stimuli (2–10 min) for subsequent recall and manipulation. Possibly, the addition of motor-cognitive dual tasks could provide effective adaptations for working memory (). This is because the inclusion of dual tasks will generate greater activation of the prefrontal cortex, which is related to improved short-term and working memory performance (). Still, some studies that did not use dual tasks found effects with longer intervention durations, as well as the short duration of the current intervention, given that these effects have been observed in studies lasting 24 weeks (; ).
In terms of semantic memory, both groups showed substantial improvement. These adaptations may be attributed to the moderate to high intensity of the sessions, which suggests an increase in cortical vascularization (), followed by greater excitability of prefrontal and temporal regions () particularly the hippocampus (), contributing to the reorganization of neural circuits (). Both findings are consistent with the existing literature, demonstrating that multicomponent and aerobic stimuli can promote adaptations in semantic memory ().
Pertaining to peripheral BDNF concentration, only the FT protocol showed significant increases compared to both baseline values, with a large effect size (d = 0.95) and the CG (d = 0.96). BDNF is essential for neural plasticity and is highly expressed in brain areas involved in cognitive processing. BDNF improves memory storage and dendritic spine plasticity. The action of BDNF is primarily mediated by the tyrosine kinase receptor B (TrkB) and initiates signaling pathways that promote neuroprotection (; ). Cognitive function and BDNF are modulated by the combination of cardiorespiratory, neuromuscular, and motor stimuli (; ).
Furthermore, at the peripheral level, maintaining the motor complexity in multi-joint and multi-planar exercises likely exerts greater neuromuscular activation, improving stability between the neuromuscular junction and the motor endplate (). These alterations may favor an increase in BDNF synthesis within skeletal muscle and its subsequent release into the bloodstream ().
It has been demonstrated that aerobic exercise significantly increases serum BDNF levels, and a significant relationship between BDNF levels and physical activity levels has been reported (). The lack of response in AT may be related to the maintenance of the training load throughout the intervention period, as progressively applied intensity in aerobic exercise influences the modulation of BDNF concentration (; ). Additionally, genetic factors that can negatively impact BDNF synthesis, such as the Val66Met gene polymorphism and APOEε4 (ε4), were not identified in the groups (; ; ). This may have affected the synthesis and increased peripheral BDNF concentration in AT.
For cardiorespiratory fitness, both groups showed moderate improvement (FT: d = 0.66; AT: d = 0.56). In fact, it is widely known that AT applied at moderate to high intensity promotes cardiovascular and respiratory adaptations that favor the enhancement of this physical capacity (). While in FT, the use of sprints, changes of direction, and other movements performed at high intensity (; ), combined with the circuit exercise structure (), may lead to positive changes in central and peripheral mechanisms that favor oxygen transport and utilization.
Concerning the ability to stand up, assessed by the FRT (FT: d = 0.97; AT: d = 0.59) and FTSST tests (FT: d = 0.61; AT: d = 0.41), both the AT and FT protocols showed significant improvements with effect sizes ranging from small to large. The rhythmic and high-intensity interval part applied in AT may stimulate muscle power and motor coordination, thus leading to improvements in this ability (). In addition, FT is predominantly neuromuscular, with training session parts focused on stimulating power and muscle strength of the lower limbs, in addition to including movements with a motor pattern similar to the functional tests analyzed (; ).
As for walking ability, mimicked by the TUG (FT: d = 0.69; AT: d = 0.54) and 10MWT (FT: d = 0.56; AT: d = 0.67) tests, both the AT and FT protocols showed significant improvements with moderate effect sizes. The stimuli targeting velocity and dynamic balance during acceleration and deceleration actions, present in both protocols, stimulate muscle power (; ). It is already known that there is a strong correlation between lower limb power and dynamic balance, as well as usual gait speed (). These stimuli constantly perturb the postural control system and activate stabilizing muscles, promoting adaptations in dynamic balance ().
With respect dexterity, which was analyzed using the GJST (FT: d = 0.58; AT: d = 0.51) and DTTS (FT: d = 0.69; AT: d = 0.23) tests, only the FT protocol showed a significant improvement with moderate effect sizes for both tests. The absence of significant adaptation in the AT group may be due to the lack of task-specific exercises involving the upper limbs. FT presents a result similar to other studies, in which the quantity of exercises targeting the upper limbs, applied with pushing and pulling patterns, may favor dexterity (). Other studies involving strength training have highlighted that performing movements with large amplitudes favors gains in joint mobility (; ).
Finally, regarding Handgrip Strength, which is considered a strong predictor of mortality and disability, a significant improvement was observed only for FT (d = 0.64) with moderate effect sizes (). These adaptations in FT may be attributed to the manipulation of equipment (kettlebell, Bulgarian Bag, Weight Plates) during the strength exercises. This result is consistent with the current literature ().
Our findings provide important contributions regarding the effects of different interventions on functional fitness, with particularities not yet evidenced in the scientific community. One limitation of this study is the lack of intensity progression in AT, which may have influenced the absence of significant changes in BDNF and could potentially yield greater effects on functional fitness. However, the percentage of HRR was monitored to maintain moderate to high intensity during the sessions, as suggested in other studies to promote cardiorespiratory adaptations that are associated with improved cognitive function. Another limitation is that the ICC was not calculated; however, according to similar studies of our research group, the tests used exhibit sensitivity above 75% and an ICC greater than 0.80. Finally, the absence of intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis is considered a limitation of this study.
Based on our findings, future research should consider other cognitive subdomains, utilizing more sensitive and specific tests, and also verify the activation of different brain areas during interventions or assessments. We recommend comparisons between men and women, with and without mild cognitive impairment, regarding cognitive and physical performance, verifying the impact of the interventions on quality of life. Furthermore, it is essential to investigate the integration of cognitive and motor stimuli over time, analyzing the residual effect of physical exercise on cognition.
2.7 Conclusion
Sixteen weeks of FT and AT promoted improvements in cognitive status and semantic memory, but only FT enhanced overall executive function and BDNF serum levels. Regarding functional fitness, both training modalities improved cardiorespiratory fitness, as well as the ability to rise and walking ability. However, only FT positively altered dexterity and handgrip strength in older women with mild cognitive impairment. These results highlight the importance of structured, targeted training programs that are low-cost and offer several benefits for this specific population, making both protocols feasible for implementation in community or clinical settings that require physical training programs to enhance the autonomy and quality of life of the aging population. Thus, this study contributes evidence supporting non-pharmacological interventions aimed at mitigating cognitive and functional decline in older adults, specifically in women, who are disproportionately affected by MCI.
2.7.1 Permission to reuse and copyright
Upon acceptance for publication, the Frontiers in Physiology requires a Copyright Transfer from all authors. Thus, we, the authors, will confirm through the authorship email sent by the journal that we are aware of the manuscript entitled “Functional Training Improves Cognitive Function, Functional Fitness, And Bdnf Levels In Older Women With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Controlled Trial” and we hereby transfer to the Frontiers in Physiology the rights to publication, reproduction, transmission, and distribution of the manuscript, as well as the information contained therein, in its entirety or in part, in printed or electronic versions of the Frontiers in Physiology or in new media developed in the future. Furthermore, the authors permit the creation of versions in other languages of the aforementioned manuscript. The authors are prohibited from publishing the Manuscript without prior approval from the Frontiers in Physiology, in any printed or digital media, with the exception of personal websites. However, the content published herein may be freely used by the authors in the preparation of presentations such as classes, lectures, courses, or conferences.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by the Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa da Universidade Federal de Sergipe. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
SR-S: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. AGR–N: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. AV: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Writing – review and editing. MP-M: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Writing – review and editing. AP-C: Data curation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing. LS: Data curation, Writing – review and editing. NC: Data curation, Project administration, Writing – review and editing. JJ: Methodology, Writing – review and editing. JA-S: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Software, Writing – review and editing. DS: Methodology, Resources, Writing – review and editing. JS: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Writing – review and editing. EDS-G: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brazil (CAPES).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AlemayehuA.TeferiG. (2023). Effectiveness of aerobic, resistance, and combined training for hypertensive patients: a randomized controlled trial. Ethiop. J. Health Sci.33 (6), 1063–1074. 10.4314/ejhs.v33i6.17
2
AllardJ. S.NtekimO.JohnsonS. P.NgwaJ. S.BondV.PinderD.et al (2017). APOEε4 impacts up-regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor after a six-month stretch and aerobic exercise intervention in mild cognitively impaired elderly African Americans: a pilot study. Exp. Gerontol.87 (Pt A), 129–136. 10.1016/j.exger.2016.11.001
3
Alr UnifespS. (2017). Apresentação e aplicabilidade da versão brasileira da MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assessment)para rastreio de Comprometimento Cognitivo Leve. Present. Appl. Braz. version MoCA Montr. Cognitive Assess. Screen. Mild Cognitive Impair. Available online at: https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/8967.
4
AltieriM.GarramoneF.SantangeloG. (2021). Functional autonomy in dementia of the Alzheimer’s type, mild cognitive impairment, and healthy aging: a meta-analysis. Neurol Sci. maio42 (5), 1773–1783. 10.1007/s10072-021-05142-0
5
Andronie-CioaraF. L.ArdeleanA. I.Nistor-CseppentoC. D.JurcauA.JurcauM. C.PascalauN.et al (2023). Molecular mechanisms of neuroinflammation in aging and alzheimer’s disease progression. Int. J. Mol. Sci.24 (3), 1869. 10.3390/ijms24031869
6
Antonio Gomes DeR. N.MarzoE.Da S. G (2020). Systematization of functional training sessions to benefit physical fitness for daily activities in older people. Int. J. Sports Exerc Med.6 (1). Available online at: https://www.clinmedjournals.org/articles/ijsem/international-journal-of-sports-and-exercise-medicine-ijsem-6-157.php?jid=ijsem. 10.23937/2469-5718/1510157
7
Aragão-SantosJ. C.De Resende-NetoA. G.NogueiraA. C.Feitosa-NetaM. de L.BrandãoL. H.ChavesL. M.et al (2019). The effects of functional and traditional strength training on different strength parameters of elderly women: a randomized and controlled trial. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fit.59 (3), 380–386. 10.23736/S0022-4707.18.08227-0
8
Aragão-SantosJ. C.de Resende-NetoA. G.Da Silva-GrigolettoM. E. (2020). Different types of functional training on the functionality and quality of life in postmenopausal women: a randomized and controlled trial. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fit.60 (9), 1283–1290. 10.23736/S0022-4707.20.10995-2
9
Aragão-SantosJ. C.BehmD. G.de MouraT. R.Da Silva-GrigolettoM. E. (2024). Dual-task training is as effective as functional training on the functional fitness of older women: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Geriatr.24 (1), 607. 10.1186/s12877-024-05204-w
10
AzevedoC. V.HashiguchiD.CamposH. C.FigueiredoE. V.OtavianoSFSDPenitenteA. R.et al (2023). The effects of resistance exercise on cognitive function, amyloidogenesis, and neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Neurosci.17, 1131214. 10.3389/fnins.2023.1131214
11
BabaeiP.Azali AlamdariK.Soltani TehraniB.DamirchiA. (2013). Effect of six weeks of endurance exercise and following detraining on serum brain derived neurotrophic factor and memory performance in middle aged males with metabolic syndrome. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fit.53 (4), 437–443. Available online at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23828292/.
12
BarhaC. K.FalckR. S.BestJ. R.NagamatsuL. S.HsiungG. Y. R.SheelA. W.et al (2022). Reshaping the path of mild cognitive impairment by refining exercise prescription: a study protocol of a randomized controlled trial to understand the “what,” “for whom,” and “how” of exercise to promote cognitive function. Trials. 9 setembro23 (1), 766. 10.1186/s13063-022-06699-7
13
BittnerV.WeinerD. H.YusufS.RogersW. J.McIntyreK. M.BangdiwalaS. I.et al (1993). Prediction of mortality and morbidity with a 6-minute walk test in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. SOLVD investigators. JAMA. 13 outubro270 (14), 1702–1707. Available online at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8411500/
14
BrinkeL. F. tenBolandzadehN.NagamatsuL. S.HsuC. L.DavisJ. C.Miran-KhanK.et al (2015). Aerobic exercise increases hippocampal volume in older women with probable mild cognitive impairment: a 6-month randomised controlled trial. Br. J. Sports Med.49 (4), 248–254. 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093184
15
BruckiS. M.MalheirosS. M.OkamotoI. H.BertolucciP. H. (1997). Normative data on the verbal fluency test in the animal category in our milieu. Arq. Neuropsiquiatr.55 (1), 56–61. 10.1590/s0004-282x1997000100009
16
BuskardA.ZalmaB.CherupN.ArmitageC.DentC.SignorileJ. F. (2018). Effects of linear periodization versus daily undulating periodization on neuromuscular performance and activities of daily living in an elderly population. Exp. Gerontol.113, 199–208. 10.1016/j.exger.2018.09.029
17
Carrasco-PoyatosM.Rubio-AriasJ. A.Ballesta-GarcíaI.Ramos-CampoD. J. (2019). Pilates vs. muscular training in older women. Effects in functional factors and the cognitive interaction: a randomized controlled trial. Physiology and Behav.15, 157–164. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.12.008
18
CoelhoF. G. de M.VitalT. M.SteinA. M.ArantesF. J.RuedaA. V.CamariniR.et al (2014). Acute aerobic exercise increases brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in elderly with Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimers Dis.39 (2), 401–408. 10.3233/JAD-131073
19
CrichtonG. E.EliasM. F.DaveyA.AlkerwiA. (2014). Cardiovascular health and cognitive function: the Maine-Syracuse longitudinal Study. PLOS ONE9 (3), e89317. 10.1371/journal.pone.0089317
20
Da Silva-GrigolettoM. E.Pereira MonteiroM. R.Aragão-SantosJ. C.VasconcelosA. B.Marcos-PardoP. J.FortesL. S. (2024). Brain functional training: a perspective article. Front Aging.5, 1368878. 10.3389/fragi.2024.1368878
21
DE MatosD. G.Mazini FilhoM. L.MoreiraO. C.DE OliveiraC. E.DE Oliveira VenturiniG. R.Da Silva-GrigolettoM. E.et al (2017). Effects of eight weeks of functional training in the functional autonomy of elderly women: a pilot study. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fit.57 (3), 272–277. 10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06514-2
22
de Oliveira SilvaF.FerreiraJ. V.PlácidoJ.Sant’AnnaP.AraújoJ.MarinhoV.et al (2019). Three months of multimodal training contributes to mobility and executive function in elderly individuals with mild cognitive impairment, but not in those with Alzheimer’s disease: a randomized controlled trial. Matur. 1oagosto126, 28–33. 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.04.217
23
de Resende-NetoA. G.da Silva ResendeM.Oliveira-AndradeB. C.da Silva ChavesL. M.BrandãoL. H. A.NogueiraA. C.et al (2021). Functional training in comparison to traditional training on physical fitness and quality of movement in older women. Sport Sci Health. 1omarço17(1), 213–222. 10.1007/s11332-020-00675-x
24
Delgado-FloodyP.IzquierdoM.Ramírez-VélezR.Caamaño-NavarreteF.MorisR.Jerez-MayorgaD.et al (2015). Effect of high-intensity interval training on body composition, Cardiorespiratory fitness, blood pressure, and substrate utilization during exercise among prehypertensive and hypertensive patients with excessive adiposity. Front. Physiol. Available online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2020.558910/full.
25
Dell’Oro de OliveiraT.Malloy-DinizL.MagalhãesS.CostaD.LacerdaS.Gonçalves QuerinoE. H.et al (2014). Propriedades psicométricas do Teste dos Cinco Dígitos para o contexto brasileiro: estudo preliminar com a população adulta.
26
DiamondA. (2013). Executive functions. Annu. Rev. Psychol.64 (1), 135–168. 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
27
Duarte MartinsA.Paulo BritoJ.FernandesO.OliveiraR.GonçalvesB.BatalhaN. (2024). Effects of a 16-week high-speed Resistance Training program on body composition in community-dwelling independent older adults: a clinical trial. Clinical Nutr. ESPEN. 1o outubro63, 84–91. 10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.06.010
28
DupuyO.GauthierC. J.FraserS. A.Desjardins-CrèpeauL.DesjardinsM.MekaryS.et al (2015). Higher levels of cardiovascular fitness are associated with better executive function and prefrontal oxygenation in younger and older women. Front. Hum. Neurosci.9, 66. 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00066
29
EnetteL.VogelT.MerleS.Valard-GuiguetA. G.Ozier-LafontaineN.NeviereR.et al (2020). Effect of 9 weeks continuous vs. interval aerobic training on plasma BDNF levels, aerobic fitness, cognitive capacity and quality of life among seniors with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease: a randomized controlled trial. Eur. Rev. Aging Phys. Activity. 6 de janeiro de17 (1), 2. 10.1186/s11556-019-0234-1
30
EricksonK. I.DonofryS. D.SewellK. R.BrownB. M.StillmanC. M. (2022). Cognitive aging and the promise of physical activity. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 9 de maio de18, 417–442. 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-072720-014213
31
Ferrer-UrisB.RamosM. A.BusquetsA.Angulo-BarrosoR.Ferrer-UrisB.RamosM. A.et al (2022). Can exercise shape your brain? A review of aerobic exercise effects on cognitive function and neuro-physiological underpinning mechanisms. AIMSN9 (2), 150–174. 10.3934/Neuroscience.2022009
32
FontesE. B.BortolottiH.CostaK. G. daCamposB. M. deCastanhoG. K.HohlR.et al (2020). Modulation of cortical and subcortical brain areas at low and high exercise intensities. Br. J. Sports Med.54 (2), 110–115. 10.1136/bjsports-2018-100295
33
GbiriC. A. O.AmusaB. F. (2020). Progressive task-oriented circuit training for cognition, physical functioning and societal participation in individuals with dementia. Physiother. Res. Int.25 (4), e1866. 10.1002/pri.1866
34
GennerK. M.WestonM. (2014). A comparison of workload quantification methods in relation to physiological responses to resistance exercise. J. Strength and Cond. Res. setembro de28 (9), 2621–2627. 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000432
35
GiffordK. A.LiuD.LuZ.TripodisY.CantwellN. G.PalmisanoJ.et al (2014). The source of cognitive complaints predicts diagnostic conversion differentially among nondemented older adults. Alzheimer’s and Dementia. 1o de maio de10 (3), 319–327. 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.02.007
36
GrégoireC. A.BerrymanN.St-OngeF.VuT. T. M.BosquetL.ArbourN.et al (2019). Gross motor skills training leads to increased brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in healthy older adults: a pilot Study. Front. Physiol.10, 410. 10.3389/fphys.2019.00410
37
GureT. R.LangaK. M.FisherG. G.PietteJ. D.PlassmanB. L. (2013). Functional limitations in older adults who have cognitive impairment without dementia. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry Neurol.26 (2), 78–85. 10.1177/0891988713481264
38
HäggS.JylhäväJ. (2021). Sex differences in biological aging with a focus on human studies. Elife. 13 maio10, e63425. 10.7554/eLife.63425
39
HeroldF.TörpelA.SchegaL.MüllerN. G. (2019). Functional and/or structural brain changes in response to resistance exercises and resistance training lead to cognitive improvements - a systematic review. Eur. Rev. Aging Phys. Act.16, 10. 10.1186/s11556-019-0217-2
40
HewstonP.KennedyC. C.BorhanS.MeromD.SantaguidaP.IoannidisG.et al (2021). Effects of dance on cognitive function in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 1o julho50 (4), 1084–1092. 10.1093/ageing/afaa270
41
HoffmannK.SobolN. A.FrederiksenK. S.BeyerN.VogelA.VestergaardK.et al (2016). Moderate-to-High intensity physical exercise in patients with alzheimer’s disease: a randomized controlled trial. J. Alzheimer’s Dis.50 (2), 443–453. 10.3233/JAD-150817
42
HolzschneiderK.WolbersT.RöderB.HöttingK. (2012). Cardiovascular fitness modulates brain activation associated with spatial learning. NeuroImage. 1o fevereiro59 (3), 3003–3014. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.021
43
HuangX.ZhaoX.LiB.CaiY.ZhangS.WanQ.et al (2022). Comparative efficacy of various exercise interventions on cognitive function in patients with mild cognitive impairment or dementia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J. Sport Health Sci.11 (2), 212–223. 10.1016/j.jshs.2021.05.003
44
HuangY.OuH.ZhaoW.LinQ.XueY.XiaR.et al (2024). The effects of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise on cognitive function in individuals with stroke-induced mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled pilot study. J. Rehabil. Med.56, 33001. 10.2340/jrm.v56.33001
45
ImaizumiM.Sepulveda-LoyolaW.Prado GomesB.PereiraC.SchererF. C.Poli-FredericoR. C.et al (2025). Effects of novel multicomponent exercise programs on brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels and physical fitness in older women. Medwave. 8 maio25 (04), e3010. 10.5867/medwave.2025.04.3010
46
IslamM. R.ValarisS.YoungM. F.HaleyE. B.LuoR.BondS. F.et al (2021). Exercise hormone irisin is a critical regulator of cognitive function. Nat. Metab.3 (8), 1058–1070. 10.1038/s42255-021-00438-z
47
KarvonenM.KentalaE.MustalaO. (1957). The effects of training on heart rate: a longitudinal study. Ann. Med. Exp. Biol. Fenn.35, 307–315. Available online at: https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1570854175302349056
48
KhanZ.SaifA.ChaudhryN.ParveenA. (2023). Effect of aerobic exercise training on EEG: event-related potential and neuropsychological functions in depressed elderly with mild cognitive impairment. Dement. Neuropsychol.17, e20220082. 10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2022-0082
49
KušleikienėS.ZivG.VintsW. A. J.KrasinskėE.ŠarkinaiteM.QipoO.et al (2025). Cognitive gains and cortical thickness changes after 12 weeks of resistance training in older adults with low and high risk of mild cognitive impairment: findings from a randomized controlled trial. Brain Res. Bull.222, 111249. 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2025.111249
50
La Scala TeixeiraC. V.EvangelistaA. L.PereiraP. E. D. A.Da Silva-GrigolettoM. E.BocaliniD. S.BehmD. G. (2019). Complexity: a novel load progression strategy in strength training. Front. Physiol.10, 839. 10.3389/fphys.2019.00839
51
LangaK. M.LevineD. A. (2014). The diagnosis and management of mild cognitive impairment: a clinical review. JAMA. 17 dezembro312 (23), 2551–2561. 10.1001/jama.2014.13806
52
LawtonM. P. (1969). Assessment of older people; self-maintaining and instrumental activites of dialy living. Gerontologist9, 279–286. Available online at: https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1573668924435454080
53
LealG.CompridoD.DuarteC. B. (2014). BDNF-induced local protein synthesis and synaptic plasticity. Neuropharmacology76 Pt C, 639–656. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.04.005
54
LeeY.JungJ.KimH.LeeS. (2024). Comparison of the influence of dual-task activities on prefrontal activation and gait variables in older adults with mild cognitive impairment during straight and curved walking. Med. fevereiro60 (2), 235. 10.3390/medicina60020235
55
LemosJ. R.AlvesC. R.de SouzaS. B. C.MarsigliaJ. D. C.SilvaM. S. M.PereiraA. C.et al (2016). Peripheral vascular reactivity and serum BDNF responses to aerobic training are impaired by the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism. Physiol. Genomics. fevereiro48 (2), 116–123. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00086.2015
56
LiX.HanT.ZouX.ZhangH.FengW.WangH.et al (2021). Long-term high-intensity interval training increases serum neurotrophic factors in elderly overweight and obese Chinese adults. Eur Appl Physiol. 1o outubro121 (10), 2773–2785. 10.1007/s00421-021-04746-w
57
LiX.SeoJ. W.BaeJ. H.JiangS.SungY.JamrasiP.et al (2024). Effects of high-intensity interval walking on cognitive and physical functions in older adults: a randomized pilot Study. Cureus16, e68165. 10.7759/cureus.68165
58
LusardiM. M.PellecchiaG. L.SchulmanM. (2003). Functional performance in community living older adults. J. Geriatric Phys. Ther. dezembro de26 (3), 14–22. 10.1519/00139143-200312000-00003
59
Malek-AhmadiM.NikkhahmaneshN. (2024). Meta-analysis of Montreal cognitive assessment diagnostic accuracy in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Front. Psychol.15, 1369766. 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1369766
60
MarvelC. L.MorganO. P.KronemerS. I. (2019). How the motor system integrates with working memory. Neurosci. and Biobehav. Rev. julho de102, 184–194. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.04.017
61
MavrosY.GatesN.WilsonG. C.JainN.MeiklejohnJ.BrodatyH.et al (2017). Mediation of cognitive function improvements by strength gains after resistance training in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: Outcomes of the Study of Mental and resistance training. J. Am. Geriatrics Soc.65 (3), 550–559. 10.1111/jgs.14542
62
MekariS.NeyedliH. F.FraserS.O’BrienM. W.MartinsR.EvansK.et al (2020). High-Intensity Interval training improves cognitive flexibility in older adults. Brain Sci.10 (11), 796. 10.3390/brainsci10110796
63
MirandezR. M.AprahamianI.TalibL. L.ForlenzaO. V.RadanovicM. (2017). Multiple category verbal fluency in mild cognitive impairment and correlation with CSF biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease. Int. Psychogeriatrics29 (6), 949–958. 10.1017/S1041610217000102
64
NasreddineZ. S.PhillipsN. A.BédirianV.CharbonneauS.WhiteheadV.CollinI.et al (2005). The Montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J. Am. Geriatrics Soc.53 (4), 695–699. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x
65
NoceraJ.CrossonB.MamminoK.McGregorK. M. (2017). Changes in cortical activation patterns in Language areas following an aerobic exercise intervention in older adults. Neural Plast.2017, 6340302. 10.1155/2017/6340302
66
NorlingA. M.GersteneckerA.BoldingM. S.HoefL. V.BufordT.WaldenR.et al (2024). Effects of a brief HIIT intervention on cognitive performance in older women. GeroScience. 1o fevereiro46 (1), 1371–1384. 10.1007/s11357-023-00893-4
67
NorouziE.VaezmosaviM.GerberM.PühseU.BrandS. (2019). Dual-task training on cognition and resistance training improved both balance and working memory in older people. Phys. Sportsmed.47 (4), 471–478. 10.1080/00913847.2019.1623996
68
O’CallaghanA.HarveyM.HoughtonD.GrayW. K.WestonK. L.OatesL. L.et al (2020). Comparing the influence of exercise intensity on brain-derived neurotrophic factor serum levels in people with Parkinson’s disease: a pilot study. Aging Clin Exp Res. setembro32 (9), 1731–1738. 10.1007/s40520-019-01353-w
69
Pantoja-CardosoA.Aragão-SantosJ. C.SantosP. de J.Dos-SantosA. C.SilvaS. R.LimaN. B. C.et al (2023). Functional training and dual-task training improve the executive function of older women. Geriatr. outubro8 (5), 83. 10.3390/geriatrics8050083
70
PaulsenJ. S.ButtersN.SadekJ. R.JohnsonS. A.SalmonD. P.SwerdlowN. R.et al (1995). Distinct cognitive profiles of cortical and subcortical dementia in advanced illness. Neurology45 (5), 951–956. 10.1212/wnl.45.5.951
71
PodsiadloD.RichardsonS. (1991). The timed “up and go”: a Test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J. Am. Geriatrics Soc. fevereiro de39 (2), 142–148. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x
72
RadanovicM.DinizB. S.MirandezR. M.NovarettiT. M. da S.FlacksM. K.YassudaM. S.et al (2009). Verbal fluency in the detection of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease among Brazilian Portuguese speakers: the influence of education. Int. Psychogeriatrics21 (6), 1081–1087. 10.1017/S1041610209990639
73
Rivas-CampoY.Aibar-AlmazánA.Rodríguez-LópezC.Afanador-RestrepoD. F.García-GarroP. A.Castellote-CaballeroY.et al (2023). Enhancing cognition in older adults with mild cognitive impairment through high-intensity functional training: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Med.12 (12), 4049. 10.3390/jcm12124049
74
RochaJ. N. de S.VasconcelosA. B. S.Aragão-SantosJ. C.de Resende-NetoA. G.MonteiroM. R. P.NogueiraA. C.et al (2023). A single-set functional training program increases muscle power, improves functional fitness, and reduces pro-inflammatory cytokines in postmenopausal women: a randomized clinical trial. Front. Physiol.14, 1054424. 10.3389/fphys.2023.1054424
75
RondãoC. A. de M.MotaM. P.OliveiraM. M.PeixotoF.EstevesD. (2022). Multicomponent exercise program effects on fitness and cognitive function of elderlies with mild cognitive impairment: involvement of oxidative stress and BDNF. Front. Aging Neurosci.14, 950937. 10.3389/fnagi.2022.950937
76
SaeterbakkenA. H.van den TillaarR.FimlandM. S. (2011). A comparison of muscle activity and 1-RM strength of three chest-press exercises with different stability requirements. J. Sports Sci.29 (5), 533–538. 10.1080/02640414.2010.543916
77
SantanaF.BorgesS.RibeiroJ.MotaC.FeitozaA.CattuzzoM. T.et al (2021). Confiabilidade da análise de processo para o desempenho da tarefa de levantar-se do solo em idosos. Fisioter. Bras.21, 586–591. 10.33233/fb.v21i6.4275
78
SchroederR. W.Twumasi-AnkrahP.BaadeL. E.MarshallP. S. (2012). Reliable digit span: a systematic review and cross-validation Study. Assessment. 1o março19 (1), 21–30. 10.1177/1073191111428764
79
Sepulveda-LoyolaW.MacielR. P. T.TeixeiraD. de C.Araya-QuintanillaF.JuniorR. A. da S.Álvarez-BustosA.et al (2025). Circuito de ejercicio funcional con tareas duales sobre variables clínicas relacionados con la sarcopenia. Retos. 1o fevereiro63, 459–471. 10.47197/retos.v63110528
80
ShahtahmassebiB.HebertJ. J.HecimovichM.FairchildT. J. (2019). Trunk exercise training improves muscle size, strength, and function in older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Scand. J. Med. and Sci. Sports29 (7), 980–991. 10.1111/sms.13415
81
SignorileJ. F.SandlerD.MaF.BamelS.StanzianoD.SmithW.et al (2007). The gallon-jug shelf-transfer test: an instrument to evaluate deteriorating function in older adults. Aging Phys Act. Jan.15 (1), 56–74. 10.1123/japa.15.1.56
82
Silva-GrigolettoM. E. D.Resende-NetoA. G. deTeixeiraCVLS. (2020). Treinamento funcional: uma atualização conceitual. Rev bras cineantropom desempenho hum. 18 maio22, e70646. 10.1590/1980-0037.2020v22e72646
83
SmidJ.Studart-NetoA.César-FreitasK. G.DouradoM. C. N.KochhannR.BarbosaBJAPet al (2022). Declínio cognitivo subjetivo, comprometimento cognitivo leve e demência - diagnóstico sindrômico: recomendações do Departamento Científico de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Envelhecimento da Academia Brasileira de Neurologia. Dement. Neuropsychol.16 (3 Suppl. 1), 1–24. 10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2022-S101PT
84
SmithJ. C.NielsonK. A.AntuonoP.LyonsJ. A.HansonR. J.ButtsA. M.et al (2013). Semantic memory functional MRI and cognitive function after exercise intervention in mild cognitive impairment. J. Alzheimers Dis.37 (1), 197–215. 10.3233/JAD-130467
85
SpruillJ. (2010). Memória de trabalho e desempenho de inibição prevê o processamento fonológico i n mulheres idosas: Evidências de índices comportamentais e eletrofisiológicos. Teses e Dissertações Disponíveis na ProQuest. Jan.1–148. Available online at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/dissertations/AAI3453383
86
SuzukiT.ShimadaH.MakizakoH.DoiT.YoshidaD.TsutsumimotoK.et al (2012). Effects of multicomponent exercise on cognitive function in older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol.12, 128. 10.1186/1471-2377-12-128
87
TaekemaD. G.GusseklooJ.MaierA. B.WestendorpR. G. J.de CraenA. J. M. (2010). Handgrip strength as a predictor of functional, psychological and social health. A prospective population-based study among the oldest old. Age Ageing. maio39 (3), 331–337. 10.1093/ageing/afq022
88
TeixeiraC. V. L.Ribeiro de RezendeT. J.WeilerM.MagalhãesT. N. C.Carletti-CassaniAFMKSilvaTQACet al (2018). Cognitive and structural cerebral changes in amnestic mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease after multicomponent training. Alzheimers Dement Y30 agosto4, 473–480. 10.1016/j.trci.2018.02.003
89
TeoT. W.MongY.NgS. S. (2013). The repetitive five-times-sit-to-stand test: its reliability in older adults. Int. J. Ther. Rehabilitation. 2 de março de20 (3), 122–130. 10.12968/ijtr.2013.20.3.122
90
ToleaM. I.MorrisJ. C.GalvinJ. E. (2015). Longitudinal associations between physical and cognitive performance among community-dwelling older adults. PLOS ONE. 13 abril10 (4), e0122878. 10.1371/journal.pone.0122878
91
TsaiC. L.ChenF. C.PanC. Y.WangC. H.HuangT. H.ChenT. C. (2014). Impact of acute aerobic exercise and cardiorespiratory fitness on visuospatial attention performance and serum BDNF levels. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1o março41, 121–131. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.12.014
92
Van DyckC. H.SwansonC. J.AisenP.BatemanR. J.ChenC.GeeM.et al(2023). Lecanemab in early alzheimer’s disease. Engl 5 Jan.388 (1), 9–21. 10.1056/NEJMoa2212948
93
ValeR. G.PernambucoC. S.da Silva NovaesJ.DantasE. H. M. (2006). Teste de autonomia funcional: vestir e tirar uma camiseta (VTC). Rev. Bras. Ciência Mov.14 (3), 71–78. 10.31501/rbcm.v14i3.703
94
VasconcelosA. B. S.Resende-NetoA. G. deNogueiraA. C.Aragão-SantosJ. C.MonteiroM. R. P.Morais JuniorG. S.et al (2020). Functional and traditional training improve muscle power and reduce proinflammatory cytokines in older women: a randomized controlled trial. Exp. Gerontol.135, 110920. 10.1016/j.exger.2020.110920
95
VasconcelosA. B. S.Aragão-SantosJ. C.De Resende-NetoA. G.RodriguesL. S.CorrêaC. B.SchimieguelD. M.et al (2022). Effects of functional and combined training on subsets of memory T cells and functional fitness of postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. Exp. Gerontol.167, 111898. 10.1016/j.exger.2022.111898
96
VaughanS.WallisM.PolitD.SteeleM.ShumD.MorrisN. (2014). The effects of multimodal exercise on cognitive and physical functioning and brain-derived neurotrophic factor in older women: a randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing. setembro43 (5), 623–629. 10.1093/ageing/afu010
97
Vega-ÁvilaG. C.Afanador-RestrepoD. F.Rivas-CampoY.García-GarroP. A.Hita-ContrerasF.Carcelén-FraileM. del C.et al (2022). Rhythmic physical activity and global cognition in older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health19 (19), 12230. 10.3390/ijerph191912230
98
Venegas-SanabriaL. C.Cavero-RedondoI.Martínez-VizcainoV.Cano-GutierrezC. A.Álvarez-BuenoC. (2022). Effect of multicomponent exercise in cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr.22 (1), 617. 10.1186/s12877-022-03302-1
99
VintsW. A. J.GökçeE.ŠeikinaitėJ.KušleikienėS.ČesnaitienėV. J.VerbuntJ.et al (2024). Resistance training’s impact on blood biomarkers and cognitive function in older adults with low and high risk of mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial. Eur. Rev. Aging Phys. Activity21 (1), 9. 10.1186/s11556-024-00344-9
100
VossM. W.OehlerC.DanielsW.SodomaM.MaderoB.KentJ.et al (2024). Exercise effects on brain health and learning from minutes to months: the brain EXTEND trial. Contemp. Clinical Trials. 1o outubro145, 107647. 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107647
101
WangC. Y.ChenL. Y. (2010). Grip strength in older adults: test-retest reliability and cutoff for subjective weakness of using the hands in heavy tasks. novembro91 (11), 1747–1751. 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.225
102
WangX.WangH.YeZ.DingG.LiF.MaJ.et al (2020). The neurocognitive and BDNF changes of multicomponent exercise for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging (Albany NY19 março12 (6), 4907–4917. 10.18632/aging.102918
103
WangZ.XuX.YangX.WangS. S.ZhouY.LiY. (2024). Effects of multicomponent exercise on cognitive function in persons with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Nurs. Stud.158, 104843. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104843
104
Wangz.XuX.YangX.WangS. S.ZhouY.LiY. (2009). Effects of multicomponent exercise on cognitive function in persons with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. Available online at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39116586/.
105
XuJ.YuJ.LiG.WangY. (2024). Exercise intervention on the brain structure and function of patients with mild cognitive impairment: systematic review based on magnetic resonance imaging studies. Front. Psychiatry15, 1464159. 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1464159
106
YanJ.LiX.GuoX.LinY.WangS.CaoY.et al (2023). Effect of multicomponent exercise on cognition, physical function and activities of daily life in older adults with dementia or mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives Phys. Med. Rehabilitation104 (12), 2092–2108. 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.04.011
107
YeeX. S.NgY. S.AllenJ. C.LatibA.TayE. L.Abu BakarH. M.et al (2021). Performance on sit-to-stand tests in relation to measures of functional fitness and sarcopenia diagnosis in community-dwelling older adults. Eur. Rev. Aging Phys. Act.18 (1), 1. 10.1186/s11556-020-00255-5
108
YesavageJ. A.BrinkT. L.RoseT. L.LumO.HuangV.AdeyM.et al (1982). Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J. Psychiatric Res. 1o de janeiro de17 (1), 37–49. 10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4
109
YongL.LiuL.DingT.YangG.SuH.WangJ.et al (2021). Evidence of effect of aerobic exercise on cognitive intervention in older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Front. Psychiatry12, 713671. 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.713671
110
YoonD. H.KangD.KimH. jaeKimJ. S.SongH. S.SongW. (2017). Effect of elastic band-based high-speed power training on cognitive function, physical performance and muscle strength in older women with mild cognitive impairment. Geriatrics and Gerontology Int.17 (5), 765–772. 10.1111/ggi.12784
111
YoshimuraT.OsakaM.OsawaA.MaeshimaS. (2023). The classical backward digit span task detects changes in working memory but is unsuitable for classifying the severity of dementia. Appl. Neuropsychol. Adult30 (5), 528–534. 10.1080/23279095.2021.1961774
112
ZahodneL. B.ManlyJ. J.MacKay-BrandtA.SternY. (2013). Cognitive declines precede and predict functional declines in aging and alzheimer’s disease. PLOS ONE. 2 setembro8 (9), e73645. 10.1371/journal.pone.0073645
113
ZhaoX.HuangH.DuC. (2022). Association of physical fitness with cognitive function in the community-dwelling older adults. BMC Geriatr. 16 novembro22 (1), 868. 10.1186/s12877-022-03564-9
114
ZhidongC.WangX.YinJ.SongD.ChenZ. (2021). Effects of physical exercise on working memory in older adults: a systematic and meta-analytic review. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 17 setembro18 (1), 18. 10.1186/s11556-021-00272-y
115
ZhuY.WuH.QiM.WangS.ZhangQ.ZhouL.et al (2018). Effects of a specially designed aerobic dance routine on mild cognitive impairment. Clin. Interv. Aging13, 1691–1700. 10.2147/CIA.S163067
116
ZhuY.GaoY.GuoC.QiM.XiaoM.WuH.et al (2022). Effect of 3-Month aerobic dance on hippocampal volume and cognition in elderly people with amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial. Front. Aging Neurosci.14, 771413. 10.3389/fnagi.2022.771413
Summary
Keywords
ageing, exercise, health, functional status, personal autonomy
Citation
Resende-Silva S, de Resende-Neto AG, Vasconcelos ABS, Pereira-Monteiro MR, Pantoja-Cardoso A, Santana Santos LE, Carvalho Lima NB, Jesus Santos JL, Aragão-Santos JC, Schimieguel DM, Santos JR and Da Silva-Grigoletto ME (2025) Functional training improves cognitive function, functional fitness, and BDNF levels in older women with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial. Front. Physiol. 16:1638590. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1638590
Received
31 May 2025
Accepted
18 August 2025
Published
11 September 2025
Volume
16 - 2025
Edited by
Mário Cunha Espada, Instituto Politecnico de Setubal (IPS), Portugal
Reviewed by
Carolina Alexandra Cabo, University of Evora, Portugal
Ella Fauziah, Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia
Angelica Stein, Federal University of Paraná, Brazil
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Resende-Silva, de Resende-Neto, Vasconcelos, Pereira-Monteiro, Pantoja-Cardoso, Santana Santos, Carvalho Lima, Jesus Santos, Aragão-Santos, Schimieguel, Santos and Da Silva-Grigoletto.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Salviano Resende-Silva, salvianoresende77@hotmail.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.