Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Physiol., 02 September 2025

Sec. Vascular Physiology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1638694

Endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation mitigates atherosclerosis by maintaining cellular homeostasis

Haiming Niu&#x;Haiming Niu1Lin Wu&#x;Lin Wu2Yingzhang CaiYingzhang Cai3Conghui YuConghui Yu3Ning LinNing Lin4Xiaodong CaiXiaodong Cai5Miaolian ChenMiaolian Chen1Linli Wang,
Linli Wang2,6*
  • 1Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan People’s Hospital, Zhongshan, China
  • 2Department of Cardiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
  • 3Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan People’s Hospital, Zhongshan, China
  • 4Key laboratory of functional and clinical translational medicine, Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen, Fujian, China
  • 5Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
  • 6Bioland Laboratory, International Bioland, Guangzhou, China

Atherosclerosis (AS) is a fatal cardiovascular disease (CVD) that threatens human health. Although there are some treatments for AS in clinical practice, cardiovascular complications such as myocardial ischemia and hypoxia, heart failure, and stroke often occur in different AS subgroups. Therefore, it is critical and necessary to screen and identify novel protein molecules to mitigate this disease. Unstable plaques of AS is the main cause for fatal consequences, so it is particularly urgent to find a treatment to stabilize plaques to prevent cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. During the formation of plaque, a large amount of protein is produced and misfolded; this process initiates endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS). Despite unfolded protein response (UPR) in the clearing of unfolded proteins, endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-associated degradation (ERAD) maintains ER proteostasis in mammalian cells by degrading misfolded proteins. However, the role of ERAD has not been fully elucidated in AS. In this review, the role of ERS in the different cells that took part in AS was summarized; then, the rescue function of ERAD in all the cell types was elucidated, especially vascular smooth muscle cells. An updated summary of the recent studies and systematic knowledge of ERAD in the mechanism of AS was presented, which may help guide future research and provide novel insights into the prevention and treatment of related diseases.

1 Introduction

Atherosclerosis (AS) is the major pathological basis of cardiovascular disease, characterized by abnormal repair response of the vascular wall to chronic inflammation and metabolic imbalance (Song et al., 2020). In recent years, with the advancement of molecular biology technology, the molecular mechanism of AS has been gradually revealed, involving multidimensional networks such as lipid metabolism disorder (Weber and Noels, 2011), immunoinflammatory activation (Wolf and Ley, 2019), cell phenotypic transformation, and genetic regulation (Zheng et al., 2024). AS plaques originated from endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, macrophages, and foam cells. Endothelial dysfunction is an early predictor of atherosclerosis, and the inflammatory response is accompanied with endothelial cell dysfunction (ECD), while high oxidative stress and reduced NO availability are the main causes of ECD, which increases vascular remodeling (Rui et al., 2021). Vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) are highly specialized cells that play a principal role in atherosclerosis. As the major components of the vessel medium, VSMCs control vessel tone and diameter, both of which are key players in maintaining vascular tension and function. VSMCs’ proliferation, migration, and apoptosis can be induced by hypertension-initiated stretch stress and involve various signaling pathways, such as ERS and MAPK (Frismantiene et al., 2018). Stretch stress induced by hypertension could nonspecifically activate all transmembrane receptors of VSMCs, which initiates the process of AS7, but berberine could inhibit the adverse cellular behavior of VSMCs, thus influencing the progression of cardiovascular disease (CVD) (Wang L. et al., 2020). Stress in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), a critical cellular organelle, a site of important biological processes, such as protein synthesis, folding, and modification (Schwarz and Blower, 2016), can be triggered by various pathological factors, and sustained or excessive ERS initiates the unfolded protein response (UPR), ultimately resulting in apoptosis and disease (Chen X. et al., 2023). The onset and advancement of AS involve ERS through different pathways, such as apoptosis, inflammatory response, oxidative stress, and autophagy (Mochida and Nakatogawa, 2022). However, there is another pathway that eliminates the unfolded proteins called endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation (ERAD), which is hardly known in AS, so we provide a summary of how ERAD affects AS to explore the role of ERAD in atherosclerosis and its potential as a novel therapeutic target.

2 Molecular mechanism of endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) and endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation

2.1 ER maintains cell homeostasis

When unfolded or misfolded proteins accumulate in the ER, cells initiate the UPR to restore homeostasis. This response is primarily mediated by three transmembrane sensor proteins located on the ER membrane, namely, PERK, IRE1α, and ATF6.PERK (Oakes and Papa, 2015). Upon activation, eIF2α is phosphorylated to inhibit global protein translation to reduce the burden on the ER, while ATF4 is simultaneously activated, which then regulates genes involved in oxidative stress and amino acid metabolism and ultimately induces the expression of the pro-apoptotic factor CHOP. When IRE1α is activated, it exhibits both kinase and ribonuclease activities, which catalyze the non-canonical splicing of XBP1 mRNA, generating the active transcription factor XBP1s (spliced XBP1). XBP1s upregulates genes encoding ER chaperones and components of ER-associated degradation (ERAD). ATF6 is transported to the Golgi apparatus, where it is cleaved by proteases to release its cytoplasmic domain (ATF6f). ATF6f acts as a transcription factor, then translocates to the nucleus, and upregulates the expression of chaperone genes (such as BiP and GRP94) and XBP1 (Lebeaupin et al., 2018). These three pathways work synergistically to enhance the ER’s protein folding capacity, clear misfolded proteins, and reduce new protein influx. If ER stress persists and cannot be resolved, the UPR signaling switches from pro-survival to pro-apoptotic. This shift primarily occurs through CHOP expression, IRE1α-mediated activation of the JNK pathway, and caspase-12 (or its mammalian homologs) activation, ultimately inducing cell apoptosis (Merighi and Lossi, 2022), as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1
Diagram illustrating the unfolded protein response in the endoplasmic reticulum. Unfolded proteins activate ATF6, PERK, and IRE1α pathways. ATF6 moves to the Golgi, gets cleaved, and enters the nucleus to regulate genes. PERK phosphorylates eIF2α, enhancing ATF4 translation, which upregulates CHOP. IRE1α splices XBP1 mRNA, producing XBP1s, which enhances expression of ER chaperones and ERAD. JNK and caspase-12 are also activated. Pathways aim to restore normal function by managing protein folding stress.

Figure 1. Molecular mechanism of endoplasmic reticulum stress. The unfolded or misfolded proteins accumulated in the ER initiate the unfolded protein response (UPR), which is primarily mediated by three transmembrane sensor proteins located on the ER membrane, namely, PERK, IRE1α, and ATF6. These three pathways work synergistically to enhance the protein-folding capacity of the endoplasmic reticulum, eliminate misfolded proteins, and reduce the input of new proteins. If endoplasmic reticulum stress persists and cannot be resolved, the UPR signal will shift from promoting survival to promoting apoptosis.

ERAD is a quality control process for misfolded or unfolded proteins in the ER, which targets abnormal proteins for ubiquitination and delivery to proteasome degradation (Hwang and Qi, 2018). The core mechanism includes two steps. First, the process is initiated by recognition and targeting of molecular chaperones. The molecular mates such as BiP/GRP78 and calnexin/calreticulin bind to unfolded proteins and try to promote proper folding (Furmanik et al., 2021). If proper folding fails, the misfolded proteins are marked for degradation. The ER lectins (e.g., OS-9, XTP3-B, and EDEM) identify hydrophobic areas of abnormal glycosylation or exposure (Krshnan et al., 2022). Second, by activating the ubiquitination signal, transmembrane E3 ubiquitin ligase complexes (e.g., Hrd1 and gp78) recognize substrates and initiate ubiquitination (Krshnan et al., 2022; Li et al., 2021; Sun and Brodsky, 2019; Wei et al., 2024). This process is essential for removing potentially harmful protein aggregates and maintaining cell function (Bhattacharya and Qi, 2019); the following figure shows the relationship between ERAD and ERS. ERAD has several branches (ubiquitin ligases), some of which are similar between yeast and mammalian cells. One branch is HRD1, also known as synoviolin (SYVN1), contains a unique membrane subunit, FAM8A1, which facilitates the interaction between HERP and HRD1 (Schulz et al., 2017). Reports also provided evidence for remodeling of HRD1 complexes on ERS (Eura et al., 2020). Consistent with its importance in ERAD, the HRD1 complex has several substrates, many of which have disease relevance (Bhattacharya and Qi, 2019; Qi et al., 2017). Critical residues in Hrd1 were responsible for the degradation of membrane substrates but dispensable for luminal substrates, which were identified by mutagenesis studies (Sato et al., 2009). Another ubiquitin ligase is gp78, also known as AMFR, which has a distinct set of membrane partners, mainly binding to Derlin-1 and UBAC2. In its carboxy-terminal tail, gp78 has a RING domain, a ubiquitin-binding CUE domain, and a G2BR motif involved in high-affinity binding to the UBE2G2 conjugating enzyme (Das et al., 2009). These gp78 cytosolic domains stimulate processive assembly of ubiquitin chains and their transfer to substrates (Li et al., 2007). Another is TEB4, also known as MARCHF6 (membrane-associated RING C3HC4), has an amino-terminal RING domain, followed by a large membrane domain containing 14 TMDs and carboxy-terminal elements (CTE) (Zattas and Hochstrasser, 2015). Similar to Doa10, TEB4 targets the membrane and soluble substrates in the cytosol. In contrast, there are no reports evidencing the role of TEB4 in the degradation of nuclear proteins. Other ubiquitin ligases, such as RNF139/TRC8, RNF145, and RNF5, need no further elaboration. The ER-membrane ubiquitin–ligase complex capable of recognizing substrates in the lumen or membrane of the ER defines each ERAD branch and promotes their transfer into the cytosol for ubiquitination. The core mechanism of ERAD includes the following steps. The first step is recognition and tagging of misfolded proteins. ER-resident chaperones (e.g., BiP/GRP78 and calnexin/calreticulin) bind to hydrophobic regions of unfolded proteins to identify misfolded or unassembled proteins (Kırça and Yeşilkaya, 2021). EDEM/OS-9 family proteins are further screened and targeted to the ERAD pathway (Zhou et al., 2020; Frachon et al., 2024). The second step is ubiquitination and retrotranslocation; in E3 ubiquitin ligase-mediated ubiquitination, the key E3 ligases (e.g., Hrd1, gp78, and CHIP) attach ubiquitin chains to target proteins, marking them for proteasomal recognition. Target proteins are translocated from the ER lumen to the cytoplasm via the Sec61 channel or the Derlin-1 complex (Needham et al., 2019). The third step is proteasomal degradation; ubiquitinated proteins are extracted to the cytoplasm via the p97/VCP (valosin-containing protein) complex and ultimately degraded by the 26S proteasome (Weihl et al., 2006). The molecular mechanism is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2
Diagram illustrating the process of unfolded or misfolded proteins being recognized in the ER lumen. They are either folded correctly via proteins like BiP/GRP78 or targeted for degradation. The proteins are processed through a complex involving HRD1, FAM8A1, HERP, UBAC2, gp78, and Derlin1, tagged with ubiquitin, and degraded by the proteasome in the cytosol.

Figure 2. The mechanism of degradation of unfolded or misfolded proteins by the Hrd1 and gp78 complexes. The core mechanism of ERAD consists of two steps. First, molecular chaperones such as BiP/GRP78 and calnexin/calreticulin bind to unfolded proteins and attempt to promote their proper folding. If it fails, these misfolded proteins will be marked for degradation. The marked proteins will be recognized by the ubiquitin–ligase complex on the ER membrane (such as Hrd1 and gp78) and retrotranslocated into the cytosolic side of the ER membrane. Once exposed to the cytosolic face of the ER membrane, substrates are ubiquitinated and subsequently delivered to the proteasome for degradation.

3 Role of endoplasmic reticulum stress in AS

3.1 ERS plays an important role in the occurrence and development of AS

The effects are mainly exerted by altering the functions of endothelial cells, macrophages, and smooth muscle cells, thereby promoting inflammation, lipid metabolism disorders, and apoptosis (Zhang et al., 2023), which function in the following aspects on AS. ERS induces endothelial cell dysfunction through increased inflammation and upregulation of adhesion molecules such as VCAM-1 and ICAM-113, while also promoting endothelial release of inflammatory factors (e.g., IL-6) via IRE1α and PERK pathways, thereby intensifying monocyte adhesion and migration to the vascular intima (Yingchun et al., 2018). In another way, ERS interacts with oxidative stress, resulting in decreased nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability of endothelial cells and aggravating vasodilation dysfunction (Lenna et al., 2014). ERS affects macrophage/foam cell formation in lipid accumulation and apoptosis (Cui et al., 2023), which is activated after macrophage phagocytosis of oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL), interfering with cholesterol reversal transport (such as inhibiting ABCA1 expression) and promoting foam cell formation (Xue et al., 2022). Persistent ERS leads to macrophage death through the CHOP-mediated apoptotic pathway, releasing lipids to form plaque necrotic cores (Sukhorukov et al., 2020). Next, amplification of inflammation, such as activation of the NF-κB pathway, promotes the secretion of TNF-α, IL-1β, and other inflammatory factors and accelerates plaque progression (Cao et al., 2016). Moreover, ERS affects phenotypic transformation of smooth muscle cell (SMC) apoptosis and plaque instability. ERS induces SMC apoptosis (via CHOP and JNK pathways) (Wang L. et al., 2020), leading to thinning of the fiber cap and susceptibility to plaque rupture, finally causing imbalance of migration and proliferation, even vascular occlusion. ERS may also promote SMC migration to intima and excessive proliferation, increase plaque volume, and exacerbate vascular wall fibrosis (Wang L. et al., 2023). On the other hand, ERS interferes with liver lipoprotein synthesis and peripheral tissue lipid processing and increases circulating LDL levels. Finally, by activating the systemic inflammatory response, ERS then leads to a chronic inflammatory environment and accelerates AS progression by releasing DAMP-related molecular patterns (DAMPs) (Bian et al., 2022). ERS may regulate lipid metabolism by restoring ABCA1 expression or enhancing autophagy, promoting cholesterol outflow, and reducing foam cell formation. ERS inhibitors, such as the chemical chaperone 4-PBA and TUDCA, may alleviate protein misfolding and improve cell function. However, pathway-specific interventions such as targeting IRE1α, PERK, or ATF6 signaling (such as small-molecule inhibitors) may reduce inflammation and apoptosis (Salvagno et al., 2022). Intervention strategies targeting the ERS pathway may provide new directions for AS treatment, but their two-sided effects (protective stress vs pathological injury) need further studies to optimize target selection.

4 Endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation in different cell types of AS endothelial cell parts

Endothelial cell dysfunction plays a key role in the occurrence and progression of AS, and its mechanisms involve multiple interrelated pathological processes (Gimbrone and García-Cardeña, 2016). Endothelial injury leads to the breakdown of tight connections, allowing macromolecules such as LDL to penetrate into the vascular intima, which are deposited and oxidized (ox-LDL) to form lipid streaks (Bai et al., 2020). Subcutaneous matrix modification promotes lipid retention and initiates plaque formation, resulting in upregulated expression of adhesion molecules such as VCAM-1 and ICAM-1, which promotes the adhesion of monocytes and T cells and then migration to the endodermis (Yang et al., 2024; Wang X. et al., 2023). MCP-1 recruits monocytes and differentiates into macrophage and phagocyte ox-LDLs, forming foam cells and constituting the plaque lipid core (Vinchi et al., 2020). The cytokines in chronic inflammatory cycle, such as IL-6 and TNF-α, are continuously released to maintain the inflammatory microenvironment (Kwaifa et al., 2020). Coagulation–anticoagulation imbalance and procoagulant phenotypic transition are reflected in the release of tissue factor (TF), activating the exogenous clotting pathway, and vWF promotes platelet aggregation and increases the risk of thrombosis (Manz et al., 2022; Ma et al., 2015). The reduced synthesis of anticoagulant substances like nitric oxide (NO) and prostacyclin (PGI2) weakens antiplatelet and vasodilation function, while decreased endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activity leads to vasoconstriction (e.g., increased endothelin-1), elevates blood pressure, and increases oxidative stress (Zhao et al., 2020). Interestingly, the secretion of PDGF and other factors promotes the migration of smooth muscle cells into the intima and proliferation to form fiber caps (Li et al., 2018). Finally, ROS-accelerated apoptosis of ECs in the late stage leads to plaque instability (Evrard et al., 2016). The main role of ERAD is to maintain endoplasmic reticulum homeostasis, protein quality control, and error-protein clearance (Qi et al., 2017). ERAD ensures the correctness of endothelial secreted proteins (e.g., vWF and clotting factors) by recognizing, reverse transporting, ubiquitinating, and degrading misfolded or unassembled proteins (e.g., vasoactive and adhesion molecules). Normal ERAD activity is the basis for vascular permeability, coagulation regulation, and inflammatory response (Ji et al., 2023). Under conditions such as hypoxia, oxidative stress, or hyperglycemia, ERAD is activated to clear accumulated abnormal proteins and prevent apoptosis resulting from overactivation of the UPR (Hwang and Qi, 2018). Moderate ERAD promotes cell adaptation to stress, while functional deficiencies may lead to chronic ERS, triggering endothelial cell apoptosis (such as atherosclerotic plaque formation) (Chapple et al., 2013). Regulation of vascular function is associated with angiogenesis and repair, indicating that ERAD regulates the stability of signaling proteins such as VEGF receptors and affects angiogenesis (such as abnormal angiogenesis in diabetic retinopathy) (Chen et al., 2015). By degrading inflammation-related proteins such as cytokine receptors, ERAD may inhibit the proinflammatory response of endothelial cells (Chen S. et al., 2023). oxLDL inhibits ERAD activity, exacerbating ERS and endothelial damage (Hong et al., 2014). Moreover, hyperglycemia leads to ERAD overload, promoting increased vascular permeability and dysfunction (endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation, 2019). Key molecules and pathways of E3 ubiquitin ligases (e.g., Hrd1 and gp78) may specifically label faulty proteins in endothelial cells and influence disease progression (Li et al., 2020). Sel1L–Hrd1 complexes may have unique substrate selectivity in endothelial cells (Wei et al., 2024; Lin et al., 2024) and recognize transmembrane protein. Moreover, targeting ERAD regulation may have therapeutic potential; for example, enhancing ERAD efficiency or alleviating ERS may be strategies for treating endothelial dysfunction (e.g., using chaperon-assisted protein folding or inhibiting excessive UPR signaling) (Christianson et al., 2023). Future studies need to further reveal the specific regulatory network of ERAD in endothelial cells to develop precise treatment strategies. The key findings of ERAD in cardiovascular diseases are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Summary of the key findings of ERAD in cardiovascular diseases.

4.1 Macrophage parts

Macrophages play central roles in atherosclerosis pathogenesis, in which monocytes differentiate into macrophages upon endothelial injury, internalizing oxidized LDL via scavenger receptors (e.g., CD36) to form foam cells that establish plaque lipid cores (Barrett, 2020; Blagov et al., 2023). They amplify inflammation by secreting cytokines (TNF-α and IL-1β) and MMPs, destabilizing plaques via collagen degradation, while their polarization dictates outcomes: pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages exacerbate plaque vulnerability, whereas M2 macrophages promote stability through efferocytosis and anti-inflammatory mediators (IL-10 and TGF-β) (Yu et al., 2023; Hou et al., 2023). Chronic lipid overload triggers macrophage death, releasing necrotic debris that enlarges plaque necrotic cores. Therapeutic strategies targeting lipid uptake, NLRP3 inflammasome inhibition, or efferocytosis enhancement may mitigate disease progression (Orecchioni et al., 2022). The ERAD pathway plays a central role in macrophages by maintaining proteostasis and regulating inflammatory signaling networks. Upon immune activation or pathogen infection, ERAD collaborates with the UPR to eliminate misfolded proteins (e.g., excess cytokines or pathogen-derived proteins), thereby preventing excessive ERS-induced apoptosis. Concurrently, ERAD finely modulates NF-κB/MAPK signaling pathways through the degradation of specific regulatory molecules (e.g., TRAF2 or NLRP3 inflammasome components), balancing the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines (such as TNF-α and IL-6) and optimizing MHC-I antigen presentation to enhance adaptive immunity. In anti-infection defense, ERAD directly targets viral proteins (e.g., influenza hemagglutinin) or counteracts pathogen immune evasion strategies (e.g., herpesvirus US11-mediated MHC-I degradation) (Huang et al., 2024). However, ERAD dysfunction disrupts macrophage homeostasis, exacerbating atherosclerotic plaque necrosis, autoimmune diseases driven by self-antigen accumulation, and obesity-associated metabolic inflammation. These roles highlight ERAD as a critical node in the immunometabolism network and a potential therapeutic target for related pathologies. However, further research needs to elucidate the mechanism between ERAD and macrophage polarization.

4.2 Vascular smooth muscle cell parts

The regulation of vascular tone and blood flow relies largely on proper VSMC activity and physiological functioning of the vasculature (Lechartier et al., 2022). VSMCs are differentiated, contractile, stationary, and quiescent in the healthy vasculature (Bennett et al., 2016). In addition, the contractile proteins include smooth muscle α-actin (SM-α-actin), SM myosin heavy chain, calponin, SM 22α, smoothelin, and SM myosin light chain (MLC) (Touyz et al., 2018). Meanwhile, under some conditions, VSMCs may shift from the contractile phenotypes to synthetic phenotypes (Elmarasi et al., 2024). Importantly, the VSMC phenotype switch is necessary during development and vascular remodeling for the formation and maturation of vessels (Lambert and Jørgensen, 2025), while this phenotype switch may be dysregulated in atherosclerosis, aortic aneurysm, or hypertension (Petsophonsakul et al., 2019). VSMCs that undergo phenotypic transformation involve MAPK signaling (Wang X. et al., 2020), epigenetic changes (Lambert and Jørgensen, 2025), and endoplasmic reticulum stress (Ren et al., 2021; Pan et al., 2024; Owens et al., 2004). During vascular development, SMC shows high plasticity, characterized by high rates of proliferation, migration, and production of extracellular matrix components such as collagen, elastin, and proteoglycans, which constitute a major portion of the blood vessel wall, while simultaneously acquiring contractile capabilities (Chen R. et al., 2023; Cao et al., 2022). Secretory and transmembrane protein folding and translocation occur in the ER, which regulates cellular Ca2+ uptake, storage, and signaling, and participates in the production of cellular lipids, such as cholesterol, glycerophospholipids, and ceramides (Ren et al., 2021). ERS regulates cell survival, apoptosis, and phenotypic switching in VSMCs through the UPR, exerting dual effects on vascular homeostasis and disease progression (Ivanova and Orekhov, 2016). Under pathological conditions (e.g., hypertension and atherosclerosis), chronic ERS activates PERK/ATF4, IRE1α/XBP1, and ATF6 pathways, inducing oxidative stress, inflammatory cytokine secretion, and calcium signaling dysregulation. This promotes VSMC transition from a contractile to a synthetic phenotype, enhancing migration and proliferation, thereby driving vascular remodeling (Clément et al., 2019). Excessive ERS also triggers CHOP-mediated apoptosis, exacerbating plaque instability and vascular dysfunction (Tóth et al., 2024). Moderate ERS, however, helps maintain cellular function by clearing misfolded proteins, suggesting that targeted regulation of ERS may offer a potential therapeutic strategy for vascular diseases. The lipid accumulation in VSMCs has been linked to the upregulation of sterol regulatory element-binding protein 2 (SREBP-2) (Ma et al., 2013), and treatment with homocysteine has also been shown to activate ERS. Diabetes mellitus, frequently associated with atherosclerosis, may involve glucosamine accumulation in vascular cells, which can induce ERS accompanied by GRP78 upregulation (Furmanik et al., 2021). Further studies are needed to elucidate the role of ERS signaling in smooth muscle cells during the development of atherosclerosis (Chengji and Xianjin, 2018). In VSMCs, ERAD not only maintains proteostasis but is also closely associated with pathological processes such as atherosclerosis, vascular calcification, and vascular remodeling. These functions mainly include the core molecular mechanisms of ERAD. Pathology-specific regulation of ERAD in VSMCs is modulated by pathological factors (e.g., oxidative stress, inflammatory cytokines, and lipotoxicity) and interacts with key pathological processes (Liu et al., 2005).

VSMC phenotypic switching and proliferation/apoptosis regulation are mediated by ERAD during atherosclerosis (Grootaert and Bennett, 2021). The increase in protein synthesis triggered ERS and ERAD activation (Wang L. et al., 2023). This process involves reactive oxygen species, and HRD1 deficiency may magnify the phenotypic change (Wang et al., 2024a); moreover, HRD1 alleviates VSMC senescence by inhibiting ERS-induced ROS production (Wang et al., 2024b). These results demonstrate ERAD functions through the life cycle of VSMCs. Wang et al. found that cholesterol induces the deficiency of HRD1 in VSMCs, along with mitochondria dysfunction, indicating the interaction between the ER and mitochondria (Wang et al., 2024b). Another mechanism is pro-survival vs pro-apoptotic roles. ERAD alleviates ERS by clearing misfolded proteins, promoting VSMC survival (e.g., via Hrd1-dependent degradation). An apoptotic trigger such as ERAD failure (e.g., E3 ligase deficiency) leads to unfolded protein accumulation, activating the CHOP pathway to induce VSMC apoptosis and necrotic core formation in plaques (Chen et al., 2021). Chronic ERS activates the ATF4/XBP1 pathway to promote VSMC osteogenic differentiation, which is exacerbated by ERAD deficiency (Zhu et al., 2024). Inflammation and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling, driven by inflammatory cytokine release, are exacerbated by ERAD deficiency, which activates the IRE1α-XBP1 pathway and increases the secretion of IL-6 and TNF-α, thereby promoting vascular inflammation. ERAD influences ECM (Koloko Ngassie et al., 2024) stability by degrading abnormal collagen and elastin, impacting fibrous cap integrity in plaques. ERAD affects VSMC pathophysiology in AS plaque stability: ERAD regulates VSMC survival–apoptosis balance, affecting fibrous cap thickness. Ox-LDL induces ERS in VSMCs, and impaired ERAD activity promotes lipid accumulation and foam cell formation (Stevenson et al., 2016). Targeting HRD1 may block the phenotypic transition from contractile to synthetic, deeply inhibiting the senescence process and preventing VSMC-initiated diseases. However, more animal studies are still needed to verify the hypothesis.

4.3 ERAD affects all stages of AS

Pathologically, AS is divided into four stages: the fatty streak stage, in which ERAD promotes the progression of AS by affecting endothelial cells and macrophages; the fibrous plaque stage, atheromatous plaque stage, and complicated lesion stage. However, current research does not have clear data on the role of ERAD in each stage. However, there are few data to report the effects of ERAD and the influence of these cells in AS. Studies have shown that plasma GRP78/BiP concentrations are elevated in patients with metabolic disorders and subclinical atherosclerosis (Girona et al., 2019). GRP78/BiP may be a useful marker for metabolic and cardiovascular risks. In addition, platelets can induce ERS and UPR in macrophages through thermosensitive membrane proteins (Derler et al., 2024), and this process is independent of the inflammatory activation of macrophages. Aging and an atherogenic diet activate different UPR pathways, leading to different vascular responses. Compared with dietary intervention, aging is associated with impaired ER protein folding function and increased aortic cell apoptosis (Zhou et al., 2021). However, currently no clear data on detailed studies of each stage of AS exist. This review can provide ideas for subsequent detailed studies on the mechanism of ERAD in AS. The molecular mechanism of ERAD in AS is shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3
Flowchart illustrating the molecular mechanisms leading to atherosclerosis. It starts with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and hyperglycemia causing endothelial cell stress. This leads to three pathways involving ERS (endoplasmic reticulum stress), ROS (reactive oxygen species), and procoagulant signals. Processes like foam cell formation, inflammation, apoptosis, proliferation, and migration occur, contributing to atherosclerosis development.

Figure 3. Endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation in different cell types of AS. Hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and hyperglycemia induce proliferation, migration, apoptosis, and senescence in vascular endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, and macrophages by activating a series of signaling pathways (such as endoplasmic reticulum stress) in these cells, which ultimately lead to the development of AS. ERAD can effectively control this progression.

5 Therapeutic potential of ERAD modulators for treatment of atherosclerosis

5.1 HRD1 modulates VSMC

Using high-fat diet (HFD)-fed mice and in vitro models, researchers found that HRD1 expression was significantly reduced in aortic tissues under cholesterol-rich conditions, correlating with VSMC dedifferentiation (loss of contractile markers like SMMHC and α-SMA) and increased ERS, inflammation, oxidative stress, and extracellular matrix remodeling. Cholesterol exposure in VSMCs exacerbated HRD1 downregulation, ERS, and activation of pro-proliferative/migratory pathways (e.g., KLF4, ROS, and JNK/NF-κB). CRISPR-mediated HRD1 knockout in VSMCs amplified these effects, enhancing proliferation, migration, and ERS, while ERS inhibition (via 4-PBA) mitigated these changes. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that HRD1 deficiency upregulated expressions of genes linked to ERS, proliferation, and migration while suppressing those of contractile markers (Wang L. et al., 2023). The study highlights HRD1 as a critical regulator of VSMC contractile homeostasis and suggests its therapeutic potential in combating metabolic disorder-driven vascular remodeling. In human atherosclerotic plaques and high-fat diet-fed ApoE−/− mice, HRD1 expression was significantly decreased, correlating with increased ERS markers (BiP and IRE1α), senescence markers (SA-β-Gal, P16, and PAI-1), and mitochondrial dysfunction. Cholesterol exposure or CRISPR-mediated HRD1 knockout in VSMCs amplified senescence, inflammation, and mitochondrial ROS, while ERS inhibition (4-PBA) or ROS scavengers (NAC and MitoTEMPO) partially reversed these effects. HRD1 overexpression mitigated cholesterol-induced ERS, ROS, and senescence, restoring VSMC homeostasis. These findings identify HRD1 as a critical regulator of VSMC senescence and a potential therapeutic target for vascular aging-related diseases (Wang et al., 2024b). However, precise animal studies relating to ERAD in vascular function need to fill the gap in this area.

Targeting the ERAD pathway offers a novel therapeutic strategy for atherosclerosis. ERAD maintains ER homeostasis by identifying and clearing misfolded proteins, and its dysfunction is closely linked to ERS in macrophages during atherosclerosis. Enhancing ERAD activity (e.g., via small-molecule activators or genetic modulation) can alleviate ERS, reduce excessive activation of the UPR, and inhibit pro-inflammatory cytokine release (e.g., IL-6 and TNF-α) (Xu and Fang, 2020) and apoptosis signaling pathways (e.g., CHOP and caspase-12), thereby protecting plaque macrophages, delaying foam cell formation, and stabilizing necrotic cores. Additionally, ERAD synergizes with the proteasome to degrade oxidatively modified proteins, potentially mitigating oxLDL-induced lipotoxicity and improving plaque stability.

5.2 ERAD demonstrates promising clinical potential in the treatment of atherosclerosis

The core rationale lies in the fact that key cells within atherosclerotic lesions (such as macrophages, endothelial cells, and smooth muscle cells) frequently experience ERS (Ren et al., 2021). As the central mechanism for clearing misfolded proteins and alleviating ERS, ERAD would become dysfunctional, exacerbating the pro-inflammatory and pro-apoptotic signals of the UPR (Travers et al., 2000). This dysfunction promotes lipid accumulation, inflammation, foam cell formation, and plaque instability. Consequently, therapeutic targeting of the enhancement or modulation of the ERAD pathway (e.g., via small-molecule drugs activating key ERAD components like E3 ubiquitin ligases, deubiquitinating enzymes, or co-factors) emerges as a potential strategy. This approach holds promise for alleviating ERS by more efficiently clearing misfolded proteins and toxic metabolites (e.g., oxidized lipid-modified proteins); it mitigates cellular damage caused by excessive UPR activation. Another approach is inhibiting the inflammatory response by reducing the release of ERS-driven inflammatory cytokines (such as IL-6 and TNF-α) and inflammasome activation, thereby lowering intra-plaque inflammation. The third is reducing cellular apoptosis by protecting endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells, enhancing plaque stability. The fourth is improving lipid metabolism by indirectly regulating lipid homeostasis, potentially by influencing the stability of key proteins involved in cholesterol reverse transport or lipoprotein metabolism, thereby reducing lipid accumulation and foam cell formation within macrophages (Zelcer et al., 2014). The fifth is stabilizing vulnerable plaques by comprehensively reducing inflammation, decreasing apoptosis and the necrotic core, and promoting fibrous cap integrity, which lowers the risk of plaque rupture and thrombosis (Kong et al., 2016). Although still in the research stage and facing challenges such as target specificity and delivery methods, strategically enhancing or restoring ERAD function through small-molecule drugs or biologic agents offers an innovative therapeutic approach for atherosclerosis based on proteostasis regulation. This approach could potentially synergize with existing lipid-lowering and anti-inflammatory therapies in the future.

Selective inhibition of ERAD-associated factors (e.g., the E3 ubiquitin ligase HRD1 or the OST complex) may modulate specific pathological processes. For instance, in advanced plaques, overactivated ERAD may exacerbate inflammation by degrading anti-inflammatory or repair proteins (e.g., IL-10 receptor), and targeted suppression of specific ERAD components could restore protective signaling (Liu et al., 2021). Furthermore, the interplay between ERAD and autophagy (e.g., via p62/SQSTM1) highlights opportunities for combination therapies, such as pairing ERAD activators with autophagy inducers to synergistically clear toxic protein aggregates (Wu et al., 2025). However, ERAD modulation requires spatiotemporal precision to avoid disrupting normal protein quality control, and clinical translation faces challenges in targeted delivery and cell-type specificity.

The strategies include cell-specific delivery using nanocarriers to target VSMCs, minimizing systemic toxicity. Therapeutic strategies targeting ERAD, such as the development of small-molecule inhibitors or enhancers, show potential for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. However, these strategies need to be precisely regulated to avoid potential side effects.

Another future research should focus on understanding the specific role of ERAD in different cardiovascular diseases and how this knowledge can be used to develop new treatments. New technologies, such as high-throughput screening and gene editing, will help reveal the complexity of ERAD and its potential therapeutic value in cardiovascular disease.

6 Conclusion

The role of ERAD in cardiovascular diseases is an emerging research area with important clinical significance. Further studies will help uncover the specific mechanisms of ERAD in cardiovascular pathophysiology and may lead to the development of new treatment strategies.

Author contributions

HN: Writing – original draft. LWu: Writing – original draft. YC: Writing – original draft, Investigation. CY: Validation, Writing – original draft. NL: Supervision, Writing – review and editing. XC: Visualization, Writing – original draft. MC: Resources, Writing – original draft. LWa: Writing – review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the High-level Chinese Medicine Construction Project (No. SG2024013), the Zhongshan People’s Hospital Young Top Talents Program Fund (B2024093), and the Zhongshan Traditional Chinese Medicine Inheritance Innovation Development Research Project (2024B3054).

Conflict of interest

Author LW a was employed by International Bioland.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Bai T., Li M., Liu Y., Qiao Z., Wang Z. (2020). Inhibition of ferroptosis alleviates atherosclerosis through attenuating lipid peroxidation and endothelial dysfunction in mouse aortic endothelial cell. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 160, 92–102. doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.07.026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barrett T. J. (2020). Macrophages in atherosclerosis regression. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 40 (1), 20–33. doi:10.1161/atvbaha.119.312802

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bennett M. R., Sinha S., Owens G. K. (2016). Vascular smooth muscle cells in atherosclerosis. Circ. Res. 118 (4), 692–702. doi:10.1161/circresaha.115.306361

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bhattacharya A., Qi L. (2019). ER-associated degradation in health and disease - from substrate to organism. J. cell Sci. 132 (23). doi:10.1242/jcs.232850

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bian M., Fan R., Yang Z., Chen Y., Xu Z., Lu Y., et al. (2022). Pt(II)-NHC complex induces ROS-ERS-Related DAMP balance to harness immunogenic cell death in hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Med. Chem. 65 (3), 1848–1866. doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01248

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Blagov A. V., Markin A. M., Bogatyreva A. I., Tolstik T. V., Sukhorukov V. N., Orekhov A. N. (2023). The role of macrophages in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Cells 12 (4). doi:10.3390/cells12040522

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cao S. S., Luo K. L., Shi L. (2016). Endoplasmic reticulum stress interacts with inflammation in human diseases. J. Cell Physiol. 231 (2), 288–294. doi:10.1002/jcp.25098

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cao G., Xuan X., Hu J., Zhang R., Jin H., Dong H. (2022). How vascular smooth muscle cell phenotype switching contributes to vascular disease. Cell Commun. Signal. CCS 20 (1), 180. doi:10.1186/s12964-022-00993-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chapple S. J., Cheng X., Mann G. E. (2013). Effects of 4-hydroxynonenal on vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cell redox signaling and function in health and disease. Redox Biol. 1 (1), 319–331. doi:10.1016/j.redox.2013.04.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen T. T., Filvaroff E., Peng J., Marsters S., Jubb A., Koeppen H., et al. (2015). MET suppresses epithelial VEGFR2 via intracrine VEGF-induced endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation. EBioMedicine 2 (5), 406–420. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.03.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen J., Zhou Y., Liu S., Li C. (2020). Biomechanical signal communication in vascular smooth muscle cells. J. cell Commun. Signal. 14 (4), 357–376. doi:10.1007/s12079-020-00576-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen R., Zhang Y., Zhao C. (2021). CHOP increases TRIB3-Dependent miR-208 expression to potentiate vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration by downregulating TIMP3 in atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther. 36 (4), 575–588. doi:10.1007/s10557-021-07154-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen X., Shi C., He M., Xiong S., Xia X. (2023a). Endoplasmic reticulum stress: molecular mechanism and therapeutic targets. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 8 (1), 352. doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01570-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen S., Zhang J., Sun D., Wu Y., Fang J., Wan X., et al. (2023b). SYVN1 promotes STAT3 protein ubiquitination and exerts antiangiogenesis effects in retinopathy of prematurity development. Investigative Opthalmology & Vis. Sci. 64 (11). doi:10.1167/iovs.64.11.8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen R., McVey D. G., Shen D., Huang X., Ye S. (2023c). Phenotypic switching of vascular smooth muscle cells in atherosclerosis. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 12 (20). doi:10.1161/jaha.123.031121

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chengji W., Xianjin F. (2018). Exercise protects against diabetic cardiomyopathy by the inhibition of the endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway in rats. J. Cell. Physiology 234 (2), 1682–1688. doi:10.1002/jcp.27038

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Christianson J. C., Jarosch E., Sommer T. (2023). Mechanisms of substrate processing during ER-associated protein degradation. Nat. Rev. Mol. cell Biol. 24 (11), 777–796. doi:10.1038/s41580-023-00633-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Clément M., Chappell J., Raffort J., Lareyre F., Vandestienne M., Taylor A. L., et al. (2019). Vascular smooth muscle cell plasticity and autophagy in dissecting aortic aneurysms. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 39 (6), 1149–1159. doi:10.1161/atvbaha.118.311727

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cui Y., Hong S., Xia Y., Li X., He X., Hu X., et al. (2023). Melatonin engineering M2 macrophage-derived exosomes mediate endoplasmic reticulum stress and immune reprogramming for periodontitis therapy. Adv. Sci. 10 (27). doi:10.1002/advs.202302029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Das R., Mariano J., Tsai Y. C., Kalathur R. C., Kostova Z., Li J., et al. (2009). Allosteric activation of E2-RING finger-mediated ubiquitylation by a structurally defined specific E2-binding region of gp78. Mol. cell 34 (6), 674–685. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2009.05.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Derler M., Teubenbacher T., Carapuig A., Nieswandt B., Fessler J., Kolb D., et al. (2024). Platelets induce endoplasmic reticulum stress in macrophages in vitro. J. thrombosis haemostasis JTH 22 (5), 1475–1488. doi:10.1016/j.jtha.2024.01.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Elmarasi M., Elmakaty I., Elsayed B., Elsayed A., Zein J. A., Boudaka A., et al. (2024). Phenotypic switching of vascular smooth muscle cells in atherosclerosis, hypertension, and aortic dissection. J. Cell Physiol. 239 (4), e31200. doi:10.1002/jcp.31200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

ERAD. (2019). Endoplasmic reticulum associated degradation (ERAD) has a critical role in supporting glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in pancreatic ♌-cells Diabetes, 68 (4), 733–746.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Eura Y., Miyata T., Kokame K. (2020). Derlin-3 is required for changes in ERAD complex Formation under ER stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21 (17). doi:10.3390/ijms21176146

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Evrard S. M., Lecce L., Michelis K. C., Nomura-Kitabayashi A., Pandey G., Purushothaman K. R., et al. (2016). Endothelial to mesenchymal transition is common in atherosclerotic lesions and is associated with plaque instability. Nat. Commun. 7 (1), 11853. doi:10.1038/ncomms11853

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Frachon N., Demaretz S., Seaayfan E., Chelbi L., Bakhos-Douaihy D., Laghmani K. (2024). AUP1 regulates the endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation and polyubiquitination of NKCC2. Cells 13 (5). doi:10.3390/cells13050389

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Frismantiene A., Philippova M., Erne P., Resink T. J. (2018). Cadherins in vascular smooth muscle cell (patho)biology: quid nos scimus? Cell Signal 45, 23–42. doi:10.1016/j.cellsig.2018.01.023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Furmanik M., van Gorp R., Whitehead M., Ahmad S., Bordoloi J., Kapustin A., et al. (2021). Endoplasmic Reticulum stress mediates vascular smooth muscle cell calcification via increased release of Grp78 (Glucose-Regulated protein, 78 kDa)-Loaded extracellular vesicles. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 41 (2), 898–914. doi:10.1161/atvbaha.120.315506

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gimbrone M. A., García-Cardeña G. (2016). Endothelial cell dysfunction and the pathobiology of atherosclerosis. Circ. Res. 118 (4), 620–636. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306301

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Girona J., Rodríguez-Borjabad C., Ibarretxe D., Vallvé J. C., Ferré R., Heras M., et al. (2019). The circulating GRP78/BiP is a marker of metabolic diseases and atherosclerosis: bringing endoplasmic reticulum stress into the clinical scenario. J. Clin. Med. 8 (11). doi:10.3390/jcm8111793

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grootaert M. O. J., Bennett M. R. (2021). Vascular smooth muscle cells in atherosclerosis: time for a re-assessment. Cardiovasc Res. 117 (11), 2326–2339. doi:10.1093/cvr/cvab046

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hong D., Bai Y.-P., Gao H.-C., Wang X., Li L.-F., Zhang G.-G., et al. (2014). Ox-LDL induces endothelial cell apoptosis via the LOX-1-dependent endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway. Atherosclerosis 235 (2), 310–317. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.04.028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hou P., Fang J., Liu Z., Shi Y., Agostini M., Bernassola F., et al. (2023). Macrophage polarization and metabolism in atherosclerosis. Cell death & Dis. 14 (10), 691. doi:10.1038/s41419-023-06206-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang C. X., Lao X. M., Wang X. Y., Ren Y. Z., Lu Y. T., Shi W., et al. (2024). Pericancerous cross-presentation to cytotoxic T lymphocytes impairs immunotherapeutic efficacy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer cell 42 (12), 2082–2097.e10. doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2024.10.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hwang J., Qi L. (2018). Quality Control in the Endoplasmic Reticulum: crosstalk between ERAD and UPR pathways. Trends Biochem. Sci. 43 (8), 593–605. doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2018.06.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ivanova E. A., Orekhov A. N. (2016). The role of endoplasmic reticulum stress and unfolded protein response in atherosclerosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17 (2), 193. doi:10.3390/ijms17020193

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ji Y., Luo Y., Wu Y., Sun Y., Zhao L., Xue Z., et al. (2023). SEL1L-HRD1 endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation controls STING-mediated innate immunity by limiting the size of the activable STING pool. Nat. cell Biol. 25 (5), 726–739. doi:10.1038/s41556-023-01138-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kırça M., Yeşilkaya A. (2021). Methylglyoxal stimulates endoplasmic reticulum stress in vascular smooth muscle cells. J. Recept. Signal Transduct. 42 (3), 279–284. doi:10.1080/10799893.2021.1918167

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Koloko Ngassie M. L., Drake L. Y., Roos B. B., Koenig-Kappes A., Pabelick C. M., Gosens R., et al. (2024). Endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced senescence in human lung fibroblasts. Am. J. physiology. Lung Cell. Mol. physiology 327 (1), L126–l139. doi:10.1152/ajplung.00264.2023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kong S., Yang Y., Xu Y., Wang Y., Zhang Y., Melo-Cardenas J., et al. (2016). Endoplasmic reticulum-resident E3 ubiquitin ligase Hrd1 controls B-cell immunity through degradation of the death receptor CD95/Fas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113 (37), 10394–10399. doi:10.1073/pnas.1606742113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Krshnan L., van de Weijer M. L., Carvalho P. (2022). Endoplasmic reticulum–associated protein degradation. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a041247

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kwaifa I. K., Bahari H., Yong Y. K., Noor S. M. (2020). Endothelial dysfunction in obesity-induced inflammation: molecular mechanisms and clinical implications. Biomolecules 10 (2). doi:10.3390/biom10020291

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lambert J., Jørgensen H. F. (2025). Epigenetic regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypes in atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 401. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2024.119085

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lebeaupin C., Vallée D., Hazari Y., Hetz C., Chevet E., Bailly-Maitre B. (2018). Endoplasmic reticulum stress signalling and the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Hepatol. 69 (4), 927–947. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2018.06.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lechartier B., Berrebeh N., Huertas A., Humbert M., Guignabert C., Tu L. (2022). Phenotypic diversity of vascular smooth muscle cells in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Chest 161 (1), 219–231. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2021.08.040

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lenna S., Han R., Trojanowska M. (2014). Endoplasmic reticulum stress and endothelial dysfunction. IUBMB Life 66 (8), 530–537. doi:10.1002/iub.1292

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li W., Tu D., Brunger A. T., Ye Y. (2007). A ubiquitin ligase transfers preformed polyubiquitin chains from a conjugating enzyme to a substrate. Nature 446 (7133), 333–337. doi:10.1038/nature05542

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li M., Qian M., Kyler K., Xu J. (2018). Endothelial–Vascular smooth muscle cells interactions in atherosclerosis. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 5, 151. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2018.00151

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li Q., Xuan W., Jia Z., Li H., Li M., Liang X., et al. (2020). HRD1 prevents atherosclerosis-mediated endothelial cell apoptosis by promoting LOX-1 degradation. Cell cycleGeorget. Tex. 19 (12), 1466–1477. doi:10.1080/15384101.2020.1754561

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li K., Zhang K., Wang H., Wu Y., Chen N., Chen J., et al. (2021). Hrd1-mediated ACLY ubiquitination alleviate NAFLD in db/db mice. Metabolism Clin. Exp. 114, 154349. doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2020.154349

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin L. L., Wang H. H., Pederson B., Wei X., Torres M., Lu Y., et al. (2024). SEL1L-HRD1 interaction is required to form a functional HRD1 ERAD complex. Nat. Commun. 15 (1), 1440. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-45633-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu X.-m., Peyton K. J., Ensenat D., Wang H., Schafer A. I., Alam J., et al. (2005). Endoplasmic reticulum stress stimulates heme oxygenase-1 gene expression in vascular smooth muscle. Role in cell survival. J. Biol. Chem. 280 (2), 872–877. doi:10.1074/jbc.M410413200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu X., Yu J., Xu L., Umphred-Wilson K., Peng F., Ding Y., et al. (2021). Notch-induced endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation governs mouse thymocyte β-selection. eLife 10. doi:10.7554/eLife.69975

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ma K. L., Liu J., Wang C. X., Ni J., Zhang Y., Wu Y., et al. (2013). Activation of mTOR modulates SREBP-2 to induce foam cell formation through increased retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation. Cardiovasc Res. 100 (3), 450–460. doi:10.1093/cvr/cvt203

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ma L., Lu N., Wu G. (2015). Antiplatelet aggregation and endothelial protection of I4, a new synthetic anti-diabetes sulfonylurea compound. Platelets 26 (4), 342–348. doi:10.3109/09537104.2014.912749

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Manz X. D., Szulcek R., Pan X., Symersky P., Dickhoff C., Majolée J., et al. (2022). Epigenetic Modification of the von Willebrand Factor Promoter Drives Platelet Aggregation on the Pulmonary Endothelium in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension. Am. J. Respir. Crit. care Med. 205 (7), 806–818. doi:10.1164/rccm.202109-2075OC

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Merighi A., Lossi L. (2022). Endoplasmic Reticulum stress signaling and neuronal cell death. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23 (23). doi:10.3390/ijms232315186

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mochida K., Nakatogawa H. (2022). ER-phagy: selective autophagy of the endoplasmic reticulum. EMBO Rep. 23 (8), e55192. doi:10.15252/embr.202255192

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Needham P. G., Guerriero C. J., Brodsky J. L. (2019). Chaperoning endoplasmic reticulum–associated degradation (ERAD) and protein conformational diseases. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 11 (8). doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a033928

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oakes S. A., Papa F. R. (2015). The role of endoplasmic reticulum stress in human pathology. Annu. Rev. pathology 10, 173–194. doi:10.1146/annurev-pathol-012513-104649

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Orecchioni M., Kobiyama K., Winkels H., Ghosheh Y., McArdle S., Mikulski Z., et al. (2022). Olfactory receptor 2 in vascular macrophages drives atherosclerosis by NLRP3-dependent IL-1 production. Science 375 (6577), 214–221. doi:10.1126/science.abg3067

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Owens G. K., Kumar M. S., Wamhoff B. R. (2004). Molecular regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation in development and disease. Physiol. Rev. 84, 767–801. doi:10.1152/physrev.00041.2003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pan H., Ho S. E., Xue C., Cui J., Johanson Q. S., Sachs N., et al. (2024). Atherosclerosis is a smooth muscle cell–driven tumor-like disease. Circulation 149 (24), 1885–1898. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.123.067587

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Petsophonsakul P., Furmanik M., Forsythe R., Dweck M., Schurink G. W., Natour E., et al. (2019). Role of vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypic switching and calcification in aortic aneurysm Formation. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, Vasc. Biol. 39 (7), 1351–1368. doi:10.1161/atvbaha.119.312787

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qi L., Tsai B., Arvan P. (2017). New insights into the physiological role of endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation. Trends cell Biol. 27 (6), 430–440. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2016.12.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ren J., Bi Y., Sowers J. R., Hetz C., Zhang Y. (2021). Endoplasmic reticulum stress and unfolded protein response in cardiovascular diseases. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 18 (7), 499–521. doi:10.1038/s41569-021-00511-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rui R., Yang H., Liu Y., Zhou Y., Xu X., Li C., et al. (2021). Effects of berberine on atherosclerosis. Front. Pharmacol. 12, 764175. doi:10.3389/fphar.2021.764175

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Salvagno C., Mandula J. K., Rodriguez P. C., Cubillos-Ruiz J. R. (2022). Decoding endoplasmic reticulum stress signals in cancer cells and antitumor immunity. Trends cancer 8 (11), 930–943. doi:10.1016/j.trecan.2022.06.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sato B. K., Schulz D., Do P. H., Hampton R. Y. (2009). Misfolded membrane proteins are specifically recognized by the transmembrane domain of the Hrd1p ubiquitin ligase. Mol. cell 34 (2), 212–222. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2009.03.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schulz J., Avci D., Queisser M. A., Gutschmidt A., Dreher L. S., Fenech E. J., et al. (2017). Conserved cytoplasmic domains promote Hrd1 ubiquitin ligase complex formation for ER-associated degradation (ERAD). J. cell Sci. 130 (19), 3322–3335. doi:10.1242/jcs.206847

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schwarz D. S., Blower M. D. (2016). The endoplasmic reticulum: structure, function and response to cellular signaling. Cell. Mol. life Sci. CMLS 73 (1), 79–94. doi:10.1007/s00018-015-2052-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Song P., Fang Z., Wang H., Cai Y., Rahimi K., Zhu Y., et al. (2020). Global and regional prevalence, burden, and risk factors for carotid atherosclerosis: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and modelling study. Lancet Glob. Health 8 (5), e721–e729. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30117-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stevenson J., Huang E. Y., Olzmann J. A. (2016). Endoplasmic reticulum–associated degradation and lipid homeostasis. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 36 (1), 511–542. doi:10.1146/annurev-nutr-071715-051030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sukhorukov V. N., Khotina V. A., Bagheri Ekta M., Ivanova E. A., Sobenin I. A., Orekhov A. N. (2020). Endoplasmic Reticulum stress in macrophages: the vicious circle of lipid accumulation and pro-inflammatory response. Biomedicines 8 (7). doi:10.3390/biomedicines8070210

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun Z., Brodsky J. L. (2019). Protein quality control in the secretory pathway. J. cell Biol. 218 (10), 3171–3187. doi:10.1083/jcb.201906047

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tóth A., Lente G., Csiki D. M., Balogh E., Szöőr Á., Nagy B., et al. (2024). Activation of PERK/eIF2α/ATF4/CHOP branch of endoplasmic reticulum stress response and cooperation between HIF-1α and ATF4 promotes Daprodustat-induced vascular calcification. Front. Pharmacol. 15, 1399248. doi:10.3389/fphar.2024.1399248

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Touyz R. M., Alves-Lopes R., Rios F. J., Camargo L. L., Anagnostopoulou A., Arner A., et al. (2018). Vascular smooth muscle contraction in hypertension. Cardiovasc Res. 114 (4), 529–539. doi:10.1093/cvr/cvy023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Travers K. J., Patil C. K., Wodicka L., Lockhart D. J., Weissman J. S., Walter P. (2000). Functional and genomic analyses reveal an essential coordination between the unfolded protein response and ER-associated degradation. Cell 101 (3), 249–258. doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80835-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vinchi F., Porto G., Simmelbauer A., Altamura S., Passos S. T., Garbowski M., et al. (2020). Atherosclerosis is aggravated by iron overload and ameliorated by dietary and pharmacological iron restriction. Eur. Heart J. 41 (28), 2681–2695. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz112

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang L., Deng L., Lin N., Shi Y., Chen J., Zhou Y., et al. (2020a). Berberine inhibits proliferation and apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells induced by mechanical stretch via the PDI/ERS and MAPK pathways. Life Sci. 259, 118253. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118253

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang X., Bi X., Yang K., Huang Y., Liu Y., Zhao J. (2020b). ROS/p38MAPK-induced lamin B1 accumulation promotes chronic kidney disease-associated vascular smooth muscle cells senescence. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 531 (2), 187–194. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.07.020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang L., Ren Z., Wu L., Zhang X., Wang M., Niu H., et al. (2023a). HRD1 reduction promotes cholesterol-induced vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypic change via endoplasmic reticulum stress. Mol. Cell Biochem.

Google Scholar

Wang X., Zhang M., Mao C., Zhang C., Ma W., Tang J., et al. (2023b). Icariin alleviates ferroptosis-related atherosclerosis by promoting autophagy in xo-LDL-induced vascular endothelial cell injury and atherosclerotic mice. Phytotherapy Res. PTR 37 (9), 3951–3963. doi:10.1002/ptr.7854

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang L., Ren Z., Wu L., Zhang X., Wang M., Niu H., et al. (2024a). HRD1 reduction promotes cholesterol-induced vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypic change via endoplasmic reticulum stress. Mol. Cell Biochem. 479 (11), 3021–3036. doi:10.1007/s11010-023-04902-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang L., Wang M., Niu H., Zhi Y., Li S., He X., et al. (2024b). Cholesterol-induced HRD1 reduction accelerates vascular smooth muscle cell senescence via stimulation of endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced reactive oxygen species. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 187, 51–64. doi:10.1016/j.yjmcc.2023.12.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Weber C., Noels H. (2011). Atherosclerosis: current pathogenesis and therapeutic options. Nat. Med. 17 (11), 1410–1422. doi:10.1038/nm.2538

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wei X., Lu Y., Lin L. L., Zhang C., Chen X., Wang S., et al. (2024). Proteomic screens of SEL1L-HRD1 ER-associated degradation substrates reveal its role in glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein biogenesis. Nat. Commun. 15 (1), 659. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-44948-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Weihl C. C., Dalal S., Pestronk A., Hanson P. I. (2006). Inclusion body myopathy-associated mutations in p97/VCP impair endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation. Hum. Mol. Genet. 15 (2), 189–199. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddi426

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wolf D., Ley K. (2019). Immunity and inflammation in atherosclerosis. Circ. Res. 124 (2), 315–327. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313591

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu S. A., L i Z. J., Qi L. (2025). Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) protein degradation by ER-associated degradation and ER-phagy. Trends cell Biol. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2025.01.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu Y., Fang D. (2020). Endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation and beyond: the multitasking roles for HRD1 in immune regulation and autoimmunity. J. Autoimmun. 109, 102423. doi:10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102423

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xue H., Chen X., Yu C., Deng Y., Zhang Y., Chen S., et al. (2022). Gut microbially produced Indole-3-Propionic acid inhibits atherosclerosis by promoting reverse cholesterol transport and its deficiency is causally related to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Circ. Res. 131 (5), 404–420. doi:10.1161/circresaha.122.321253

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang H., Chen J., Liu S., Xue Y., Li Z., Wang T., et al. (2024). Exosomes from IgE-Stimulated mast cells aggravate asthma-mediated atherosclerosis through circRNA CDR1as-Mediated endothelial cell dysfunction in mice. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 44 (3), e99–e115. doi:10.1161/atvbaha.123.319756

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yingchun H., Yahong M., Jiangping W., Xiaokui H., Xiaohong Z. (2018). Increased inflammation, endoplasmic reticulum stress and oxidative stress in endothelial and macrophage cells exacerbate atherosclerosis in ApoCIII transgenic mice. Lipids Health Dis. 17 (1), 220. doi:10.1186/s12944-018-0867-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu L., Zhang Y., Liu C., Wu X., Wang S., Sui W., et al. (2023). Heterogeneity of macrophages in atherosclerosis revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing. FASEB J. official Publ. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 37 (3), e22810. doi:10.1096/fj.202201932RR

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zattas D., Hochstrasser M. (2015). Ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation at the yeast endoplasmic reticulum and nuclear envelope. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 50 (1), 1–17. doi:10.3109/10409238.2014.959889

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zelcer N., Sharpe L. J., Loregger A., Kristiana I., Cook E. C., Phan L., et al. (2014). The E3 ubiquitin ligase MARCH6 degrades squalene monooxygenase and affects 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A reductase and the cholesterol synthesis pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 34 (7), 1262–1270. doi:10.1128/mcb.01140-13

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang S., Lv Y., Luo X., Weng X., Qi J., Bai X., et al. (2023). Homocysteine promotes atherosclerosis through macrophage pyroptosis via endoplasmic reticulum stress and calcium disorder. Mol. Med. Camb. Mass. 29 (1), 73. doi:10.1186/s10020-023-00656-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao J., Quan X., Xie Z., Zhang L., Ding Z. (2020). Juglanin suppresses oscillatory shear stress-induced endothelial dysfunction: an implication in atherosclerosis. Int. Immunopharmacol. 89, 107048. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2020.107048

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng L., Chen X., He X., Wei H., Li X., Tan Y., et al. (2024). METTL4-Mediated mitochondrial DNA N6-Methyldeoxyadenosine promoting macrophage inflammation and atherosclerosis. Circulation. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.124.069574

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou Z., Torres M., Sha H., Halbrook C. J., Van den Bergh F., Reinert R. B., et al. (2020). Endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation regulates mitochondrial dynamics in brown adipocytes. Science 368 (6486), 54–60. doi:10.1126/science.aay2494

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou Y., Wan X., Seidel K., Zhang M., Goodman J. B., Seta F., et al. (2021). Aging and hypercholesterolemia differentially affect the unfolded protein response in the vasculature of ApoE(-/-) mice. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 10 (18), e020441. doi:10.1161/jaha.120.020441

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu X.-X., Meng X.-Y., Chen G., Su J.-B., Fu X., Xu A.-J., et al. (2024). Nesfatin-1 enhances vascular smooth muscle calcification through facilitating BMP-2 osteogenic signaling. Cell Commun. Signal. 22 (1). doi:10.1186/s12964-024-01873-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: atherosclerosis, ERS, ERAD, Hrd1, vascular smooth muscle cell

Citation: Niu H, Wu L, Cai Y, Yu C, Lin N, Cai X, Chen M and Wang L (2025) Endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation mitigates atherosclerosis by maintaining cellular homeostasis. Front. Physiol. 16:1638694. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1638694

Received: 31 May 2025; Accepted: 30 July 2025;
Published: 02 September 2025.

Edited by:

Michael S. Wolin, New York Medical College, United States

Reviewed by:

Erik J Behringer, Loma Linda University, United States
Shuangchan Wu, Northwestern Polytechnical University, China
Lu Liu, Hunan University, China
Yue Dai, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China

Copyright © 2025 Niu, Wu, Cai, Yu, Lin, Cai, Chen and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Linli Wang, d2FuZ2xpbmxpNjU4OUAxNjMuY29t, d2FuZ2xsMzlAbWFpbC5zeXN1LmVkdS5jbg==

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.