ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Physiol.
Sec. Computational Physiology and Medicine
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1642645
Impact of Multi-Limb Oscillometric Cuff Measurements on Hemodynamics: Insights from Pulse Wave Propagation Modeling
Provisionally accepted- Nalecz Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: Multi-limb oscillometric cuff measurements can be used for estimating various vascular parameters and evaluating side differences in arterial pulse waveforms. In this study, we conduct an in-silico investigation to evaluate the potential impact of such measurements on hemodynamics.We employed a 0-1D model of pulse wave propagation to examine the relationship between different levels of oscillometric cuff pressure applied simultaneously at multiple sites (right above the wrists and/or ankles) and the resulting changes in blood pressure and flow at selected sites in the vascular system, assuming the absence of cardiovascular regulatory mechanisms. The simulations included various combinations of cuff placements, including four cuffs applied simultaneously on all limbs. In addition, we conducted both global and local sensitivity analysis to evaluate the impact of selected cardiovascular parameters on the simulation results.In the case of cuffs placed on all four limbs and inflated to suprasystolic pressureeffectively occluding the vessels beneath the cuffs -our simulations indicated an increase in mean arterial pressure (MAP) of approximately 10% in the ascending aorta, left common carotid artery, and abdominal aorta. Additionally, the mean carotid artery blood flow increased by approximately 11% compared to baseline value. In contrast, for the case with a cuff placed only on one wrist, we observed a significantly smaller MAP increase of only 2.5%, with a 3% rise in mean carotid artery flow. Our sensitivity analysis revealed that these changes can be mitigated by relatively small adjustments in specific cardiovascular parameters, suggesting that properly functioning physiological regulatory mechanisms should easily compensate for the cuff induced hemodynamic alterations. Furthermore, global sensitivity analysis demonstrated that relatively similar increases in MAP and mean carotid blood flow are expected for different combinations of cardiovascular parameters values, indicating the robustness of our findings.Significance: This in silico study suggests that multi-limb cuff-based measurements may induce measurable central hemodynamic alterations if not counteracted by cardiovascular regulatory mechanisms. This suggests that such measurements may not be innocuous to individuals with some deficiencies in cardiovascular regulation. Further investigation is warranted to verify this in vivo and, if necessary, establish appropriate safety protocols.
Keywords: cardiovascular modeling, oscillometric measurement, Hemodynamics, Blood Pressure, Pulse wave propagation
Received: 06 Jun 2025; Accepted: 28 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wolos, Pstras, Debowska and Poleszczuk. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Kamil Wolos, Nalecz Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.