Rachel R. Reid1*
Neal Dawson1Eleanor Duncan1Robert Gillespie1Christopher Mitchell2Claire J. Branston1,3Pablo Capilla-Lasheras1,4,5
Jelle Boonekamp1
Davide M. Dominoni1- 1School of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- 2Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Cornwall, United Kingdom
- 3School of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- 4Swiss Ornithological Institute (Vogelwarte), Sempach, Switzerland
- 5Doñana Biological Station, Spanish National Research Council (EBD-CSIC), Sevilla, Spain
A Correction on
Partial night lighting may reduce the physiological impact of artificial light at night on captive zebra finches
by Reid RR, Dawson N, Duncan E, Gillespie R, Mitchell C, Branston CJ, Capilla-Lasheras P, Boonekamp J and Dominoni DM (2025). Front. Physiol. 16:1592407. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1592407
In the published article, there was an error. [Inter-plate and intra-plate CV were labelled incorrectly for relative telomere length].
A correction has been made to [Methods], [2.5 Measuring relative telomere length], [Paragraph 4]. This sentence previously stated:
“[Mean inter- and intra-plate of Ct values were 2.14% and 2.97% for telomere reactions and 1.02% and 1.10% for the RAG-1 reactions.]”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“[Mean intra- and inter-plate of Ct values were 2.14% and 2.97% for telomere reactions and 1.02% and 1.10% for the RAG-1 reactions.]”
In the published article, there was an error. [Inter-plate and intra-plate CV were labelled incorrectly for antioxidant capacity of plasma].
A correction has been made to [Methods], [2.7 Measuring antioxidant capacity of plasma], [Paragraph 2]. This sentence previously stated:
“[The between plate repeatability was R 2 = 0.57 (N = 20). The inter-plate CV calculated using these same 20 samples was 9.35% and the intra-plate CV was 10.97%.]”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“[The between plate repeatability was R 2 = 0.57 (N = 20). The intra-plate CV calculated using these same 20 samples was 9.35% and the inter-plate CV was 10.97%.]”
The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: avian health, avian physiology, artificial light, light pollution, urban ecology
Citation: Reid RR, Dawson N, Duncan E, Gillespie R, Mitchell C, Branston CJ, Capilla-Lasheras P, Boonekamp J and Dominoni DM (2025) Correction: Partial night lighting may reduce the physiological impact of artificial light at night on captive zebra finches. Front. Physiol. 16:1644617. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1644617
Received: 10 June 2025; Accepted: 19 August 2025;
Published: 29 August 2025.
Edited and reviewed by:
Colin Guy Scanes, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, United StatesCopyright © 2025 Reid, Dawson, Duncan, Gillespie, Mitchell, Branston, Capilla-Lasheras, Boonekamp and Dominoni. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Rachel R. Reid, cmFjaGVscm9zZXJlaWQxNDFAb3V0bG9vay5jb20=