Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CORRECTION article

Front. Physiol.

Sec. Avian Physiology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1644617

This article is part of the Research TopicEnvironmental Challenges to Avian Populations: A Physiological PerspectiveView all 7 articles

Correction: Partial night lighting may reduce the physiological impact of artificial light at night on captive zebra finches

Provisionally accepted
Rachel Rose ReidRachel Rose Reid1*Neal DawsonNeal Dawson1Eleanor DuncanEleanor Duncan1Robert GillespieRobert Gillespie1Claire J BranstonClaire J Branston1,2Pablo Capilla-LasherasPablo Capilla-Lasheras1,3,4Jelle BoonekampJelle Boonekamp1Davide M DominoniDavide M Dominoni1
  • 1University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
  • 2University of the West of Scotland, Paisley, United Kingdom
  • 3Schweizerische Vogelwarte, Sempach, Switzerland
  • 4Estacion Biologica de Donana CSIC, Seville, Spain

This article is a correction to:

  1. Partial night lighting may reduce the physiological impact of artificial light at night on captive zebra finches

    1. Read original article

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Select one of your emails

You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:

Notify me on publication

Please enter your email address:

If you already have an account, please login

You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here

Correction on: Reid RR, Dawson N, Duncan E, Gillespie R, Mitchell C, Branston CJ, Capilla-Lasheras P, Boonekamp J and Dominoni DM (2025) Partial night lighting may reduce the physiological impact of artificial light at night on captive zebra finches. Front. Physiol. 16:1592407. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1592407 In the published article, there was an error. [Inter-plate and intra-plate CV were labelled incorrectly for relative telomere length].A correction has been made to [Methods], [2.5 Measuring relative telomere length], [Paragraph 4]. This sentence previously stated: "[Mean inter-and intra-plate of Ct values were 2.14% and 2.97% for telomere reactions and 1.02% and 1.10% for the RAG-1 reactions.]"The corrected sentence appears below: "[Mean intra-and inter-plate of Ct values were 2.14% and 2.97% for telomere reactions and 1.02% and 1.10% for the RAG-1 reactions.]"The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.In the published article, there was an error. [Inter-plate and intra-plate CV were labelled incorrectly for antioxidant capacity of plasma]. "[The between plate repeatability was R 2 = 0.57 (N = 20). The inter-plate CV calculated using these same 20 samples was 9.35% and the intra-plate CV was 10.97%.]"

Keywords: Avian health, Avian physiology, Artificial light, light pollution, Urban Ecology

Received: 10 Jun 2025; Accepted: 19 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Reid, Dawson, Duncan, Gillespie, Branston, Capilla-Lasheras, Boonekamp and Dominoni. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Rachel Rose Reid, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary Material