ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Physiol.
Sec. Environmental, Aviation and Space Physiology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1645482
Variability in individual musculoskeletal response is not increased by countermeasures during bed rest
Provisionally accepted- 1Institute of Aerospace Medicine, German Aerospace Center, Cologne, Germany
- 2Institute of Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology (IMBIE), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- 3Institute of Cardiovascular Research, Molecular and Cellular Sport Medicine, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- 4Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Under weightlessness conditions, there is a loss of bone and muscle mass. However, these adaptations are subject to great inter-individual variability. As an analogue to weightlessness, bed rest studies are carried out on Earth, which also serve to test countermeasures counteracting bone and muscle loss. Since study participants react differently to any interventions such as countermeasures, it can be assumed from a statistical point of view that the between-subject variation (BSV) is inflated when combining bed rest with countermeasure exercises. The aim of this study was therefore to examine whether a countermeasure has an effect on the magnitude of BSV. To this purpose, the decrease in muscle cross-sectional area and bone mineral content was analyzed at different measurement sites of 123 subjects in the control and intervention groups from six bed rest studies that tested different countermeasures. A novel statistical approach was chosen enabling quantification of the specific amount of variability after countermeasures (UCM). The comparison of the observed variability (UObs) between intervention and control groups showed no difference (all p≥0.08), suggesting that BSV was not affected by the countermeasures. UCM was negligible in the context of the overall variability, indicating that it plays a subordinate role in whether a crew member responds weakly or strongly to a training intervention. But rather, the extent to which, the astronaut reacts to unloading is the main factor influencing variability.
Keywords: Between-subject variation, Variability quantification, countermeasure variability, inter-individual adaptations, muscle atrophy, bone loss
Received: 11 Jun 2025; Accepted: 16 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Böcker, Schmitz, Hoffmann, Bloch and Rittweger. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Jonas Böcker, jonas.boecker@dlr.de
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.